Will Iran Become A Democracy Or Return To A Monarchy?

FaceTime or Ask Patrick any questions on minnect.com/.
Want to get clear on your next 5 business moves? valuetainment.com/academy/
In this short clip, Patrick Bet-David, Nazanin Nour, Mortea Alborzi, Polet Sabetimani, and Vincent Oshana talk about what Iran will look like if the revolutions are successful.
Watch the full podcast here: • Reaction To Iranian Pr...
To reach the Valuetainment team you can email: [e-mail]
#valuetainment

[@loner1562]

As an Iranian who loves the country and has studied some good amount of history(and a bit of tracking political records in recent times), I think returning to a constitutional monarchy is not only the safest option(due to how important Iran is in terms of geo-politics and how badly political weakness has been exploited in recent centuries), but also the most needed option. It's not a bad thing to return to something that has proven right in the past, some evil "behind the scenes hands" are deceiving people into thinking that a monarchy is "old fashioned" or "un-democratic"(I'd even guess the title of this video is misleading itself since it should be "A republic or Return to a monarchy" since, again, democracy can exist or not exist in either systems)...May God help us save and rebuild our country once again PS edit: I've watched a couple of your videos especially in recent weeks, good stuff:))) #جاویدشاه

[@pulpfiction1123]

An educated comment.

[@AliNe-ye6tn]

exactly.

[@orthotuber]

I think constitutional monarchy like the UK will be best for Iran, at least for now. Democracy has a really poor track record in the Middle East. Jordan is one of the most stable countries in that region and their monarchy probably has something to do with that.

[@williammoran4898]

A republic instead of monarchy, a monarchy can be oppressive to minorities. That's what's hurt the middle east, a republic protecting the minorities from the majority or religious zealots would be superior imo.

[@1969cmp]

@@williammoran4898 ......like the People's Republic of China is kind to minorities ?

[@waifuhunter9709]

@@williammoran4898 100% agree We are tired of being rulled by kings

[@orthotuber]

@@williammoran4898 Um Iran is a republic ATM and the current regime is more oppressive than the Shah ever was. Jordan is a constitutional monarchy and we never hear about persecution of minorities over there. And no what hurt the Middle East was when their monarchs or dictators were removed from power. Because these are Muslims who have a completely different worldview and mindset to the Judeo-Christian west. These are not "live and let live" people, they are "might makes right" people. That's why democratic republics just don't work over there, and we have receipts to prove this.

[@christiandovecraft6254]

The Iranian monarchy is done my dude. The current royal family has lived their entire lives abroad. It would make no sense lol. It would have been better had the Shah stayed, but that ship has sailed. Time to move foresaw. Secular republic, period.

[@irani544]

Democract OR monarchy? Monarchy can be totally democratic.

[@kugelblitz5812]

Iranians need a figurehead to rally around. The Shah''s son has been supportive of the protests and democratic movement in Iran. Of course he should only reign as a constitutional monarch if he returned, but he could play an important role in establishing a true democracy in the country.

[@eggisfun4217]

agreed

[@wexqlp3863]

Monarchy should not be part of any of this. If Iranians want a true peace. Then true democracy must be thought.

[@toluedechantal1912]

So what? Are there not hundreds who have done more than him, who are closer to the people than him? Why don't you ask the people of Iran who they think represents them. He has lived abroad his entire life and with all the wealth and opportunities that they have, neither of his children speak Persian with ease. We don't need him, our brave youth are our leaders.

[@jagernkk9875]

​@@wexqlp3863the most democratic contries are constitutional monarchies. While UmeRka is nowhere near to the good democracy. Even the french did not become really democratic overnight it went through many shits ups and downs, every new revolution made them more democratic etc, and france is the worst example of becoming democracy. While UK even though it is constitutional monarchy, it made a lot of effort to turn to democracy without much bloodshed just like norway,sweden and denmark

[@wexqlp3863]

@@jagernkk9875 - You’re comparing the U.K. to the Scandinavian countries🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 you must be deluded. Statistically all Monarch countries fail early on.

[@AliNe-ye6tn]

Democracy OR monarchy? The constitutional Monarchy which the Majority of Iranians prefer according to polls can be totally democratic and also in the top levels of freedom, democracy, and quality of life like Sweden, Norway, the Uk, Belgium, Canada, Japan, and many others countries.

[@RamtinHG]

Who said constitutional monarchy is certainly against democracy

[@nm2000]

A constitutional monarchy like in the UK would be the best.

[@waifuhunter9709]

Any monarchy would be worst

[@Darjeeling_Gup]

@@waifuhunter9709 cringe

[@frankhernandez6524]

They should go Monarchy.

[@eggisfun4217]

@@waifuhunter9709 smh there is a difference between constitutional monarchy and absoulete monarchism what do you have against monarchs?

[@wexqlp3863]

Monarchy would lead to corruption like all monarchies

[@PhamVans]

Iran will be Iran, one of the most beautiful places and cultures on the planet. The Black Revolution they had back in 79 with the return of the Ayatollah will never be forgotten.

[@RoyalFalcon777]

This time we are in the Great Revolution Of Iran. The Greatest !

[@grawakendream8980]

everything is forgotten

[@masterbrick6282]

Return the king

[@aryanmaher336]

Monarchy is the part of Irans identity right now HM Reza Pahlavi is the greatest hope for Iranians to being the democracy and freedom they want.

[@marmary5555]

Since I keep seeing a lot of uneducate people here, I'm going to debunk some myth about the Shah and Iran. 1️⃣ Did the West overthrow a "democratically elected governement"? Not really. Let's put things in perspective: The shah was the king since 1941 and Mossadegh was the prime minister. Every prime minister was chosen both by the parliament and by the King (Shah). So there were no "democratic elections". It was Mossadegh who rallied against the Shah & tried to overthrow him, the Shah could have removed him (according to the constitution) but it was a delicate situation so he decided to accept help from his allies. And bear in mind that Mossadegh's disagreement with the Shah had nothing to do with an ideology or disagreement in nationalizing the oil. The Shah himself WANTED the nationalization of oil. The problem was mainly Mossadegh's closeness to communists and his personal greed into seizing power from a dynasty (the Pahlavi) who took land from his Qâjâr ancestors (yes Mosssadegh was a former "Prince") and redistributed it to Iranian farmers. So Mossadegh had an inherited hatred against the Pahlavi Kings whom he viewed as illegitimate rulers. Mossadegh wasn't acting in a democratic way! He first put pressure on the parliament to increase his power, he closed the supreme court, he stopped parliament's election before every member was elected because he was afraid of pro pahlavi supporters. He dissolved the parliament through a referendum: can we really consider democratic a referendum where parliament members vote to close the parliament itself? The vote wasn't even a secret! Mossadegh was ruining iranian finances with his immediate nationalisation, while the Shah chose a wiser solution with slow nationalisation, in which 51% of Iran's oil was nationalised in 1973. 2️⃣ Was the King/Shah a "brutal dictator"? If you ask people who support terrorists (Mujahedin) and leftists, yes. But if you as random Iranians, the answer is no. The CIA psychologically profiled the Shah as a "brillant but dangerous megalomaniac who persues his own aims in disregard of USA interest. The Shah is an uncertain allie." The Shah faced two major violent and terroristic groups: communists and islamists. Numbers of fatalities during the Pahlavi kingdom have been gravely exaggerated and falsified. Leftists claimed that the Shah killed "10.000 people" and without fact checking Western media took this claim and ran with it, portraying the Shah as a "brutal dictator" and making victims out of a couple of fanatical Muslim terrorists who were (rightfully) imprisoned & underwent torture. In 1975 There were 3700 political prisoners, in 1977, 3087. 3164 people died, but 2781 perished because of the 1978-1979 revolution, So this leaves 383 that have died during the Pahlavi kingdom, where 197 were "guerrillas" fighters who planted bombs and terrorists attacks, which would be categorized as terrorists in today's society. In the beginning of the 1970s, the Shah increased oil price. That's when Western countries started a huge denigratory campaign against him. Every media, like the NYT, and especially the BBC, depicted him as a monster. He was dissed in every interview, with provocative questioning methods, almost like a police investigation. Western media managed to turn public opinion against Iranians so everybody in the West hatesld Iran and the Shah. To such extent that when the "revolution" had just started, an english reporter burned the iranian flag. So when the shah decided not to renovate oil agreements, suddendly a "revolution" broke out in 1978... 3️⃣ Was the King /Shah keeping the country underdeveloped? Absolutely not. It was the exact opposite. His & his father's reforms were making Iran a prosperous country. First, infastructure was developing and it was the King/Shah who laid ground for Tehran's metro and the highways in Iran today who were build during the Islamic Republic's occupation. Not to mention social and educational growth: in 1978, 80% could read and write from having barely 1% literacy when the first Pahlavi king became ruler of Iran. In the 1960s & 1970s, Iran had a general growh of 10%, an industrial growth of 20%. From having 7 to 22 universities, from 36 742 to more than 100.000 students in higher education. Between 1925 to 1976 Iran's economy had grown 700 times, per capita, 200 times. Between 1965 and 1978, income per capita rose from 195$ dollars to 2400$. Etc.

[@aryanmaher336]

👏🏼👏🏼

[@OleT967]

make it a constitutional monarchy with democratic election of parlament. The Parlament makes law & the monarch controls the army and is constitutional bound to not intervene in politics, but is commander in chef. That way no elected prime minister or president can remane in power if elected out.

[@orthotuber]

I agree, this what Jordan has and it's one of the most stable and liberal countries in the Middle East.

[@chiman75]

U guys haven't learned anything thing? Symbolic king like UK ok if ppl want that but no real powers but those elected by ppl.

[@glennmillerfan]

I agree. Maybe Reza Pahlavi can handle foreign policy, whereas an elected parliament will control all other things.

[@vituhst0626]

democracy is not a system, but a regime, a monarchy can very well be democratic, and republics are not synonymous with democracy, so much so that the most democratic country in the world is Norway, a Monarchy..

[@shawnbrigance3993]

Always interesting, and relevant, Thanks!

[@Digmen1]

Look at the Philipines, the people voted for Bong Bong Marcos even though he had no policies, they just longed for the Marco era (And they dont know why, as it was so long ago)

[@mh7135]

Pahlavi❤👑

[@PeymanADLDOUSTIHAGH]

What is democracy? Democracy is a Greek word meaning the rule of the people. It is not a form of state. It is not a form of government. This means that people will decide on their own decisions and foreign policies. As a result, democracy is the notion that the welfare and well-being of citizens will be ensured by state actors. What is a monarchy state? A monarchy state is a form of state where power is centralized in the hands of one person. Unfortunately, history has shown that this type of governance often leads to the state's failure. However, Monarch Reza Pahlavi II of Iran is a constitutional monarch, which means that the power is not solely in his hands. Instead, it is dispersed among state actors such as the legislative body. In conclusion, any form of state, whether a republic state or a constitutional monarchy state, needs a constitution with enforceable actors to ensure the well-being of citizens.

[@MaryChitgar]

The most democratic countries in the world are constitutional monarchies. Iranians want a king to represent their nation and maintain security.

[@jan6485]

I believe Ebrahim Raisi is here to stay for a bit. Regardless of what we think About him. I love the west and i live in the west, but we have Made grave mistakes when it comes to “ freedom policy” . God bless Everyone all over the world may there be peace

[@glennmillerfan]

Probably into Spring or Summer of 2023 if I had to guess. The Iranian government will have a brief rally of support with the 44th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution, but the rotting structure will only have about a month or two support bump.

[@davidr4523]

Reza Pahlavi has been too terrified to speak out for the last 43 years. He is living comfortably in the USA and traveling the world without too much issue. The minute he starts criticizing the current government his life and his family's life will be at risk. It is not worth it for him.

[@ariaebrahimi3629]

Ok

[@marmary5555]

_"Will Iran Become A Democracy Or Return To A Monarchy?"_ What kind of a question is that? This title suggests that a Monarchy is not a democracy. Sweden is a Monarchy and is way more democratic than the Republic of North Korea. I think your social media manager should change the title. It's a Republic vs a Monarchy, not "Democracy vs Monarchy". So the right question is "Will Iran become a Republic or a Monarchy?" - Because that is a RELEVANT question among the opposition. As you may or may not know HRH Reza Pahlavi is now the leading figure of the opposition both inside and outside of Iran. He's been described as the person who will lead Iran into a transitioning government after the fall of this brutal mullocratic regime. And he is himself the most democratic leader, since he said he will let Iranians decide whether they want a republic or a monarchy.

[@nicoaguswibiantoro5489]

Iran is Great Nation, without sanctions, Iran would be the Richest Nation in the Middle East With all the Technologies, Human Resources & Tons of Natural Resources Iran could be Global Player, with strategic location for Transhipment between Europe & Asia Iran could be the Gateway And not forget The Beauty of Iranian Nature Love fron Indonesia

[@Ophadelax]

Parliamentary Monarchy is very much achievable like many countries in Europe it's not a very strange concept I don't understand the confusion!

[@ariaebrahimi3629]

There is no confusion, just a title for view

[@truetory6231]

define democracy? because right now Iran CLAIMS to be a democracy but we all know that isn't true. The best way to secure democracy is under a constitutional monarchy, just as Japan, the UK or the Nordic Countries

[@aland5692]

Have this woman in Dark Blue heard of the internet? Ok, a new generation has not seen the Pahlavi dynasty does not mean they don't know about it! I have never seen a Nazi killing Jews, but that does not mean I don't know about it!

[@robinviden9148]

Yeah, the question is flawed. The highest ranking countries in most indexes of democracy, political stability and welfare of its citizens are constitutional multi-party parliamentary monarchies with a ceremonial monarch.

[@supercharger5727]

I think the most likely that if they become a monarchy it won't be full power it will most likely be constitutional

[@Shiroya_Rumika]

Just to clarify, the heir of Iran monarchy doesn't want to become a King, he wanted to the country to become a Democratic state

[@noushzad19]

Democracy or Monarchy? Monarchy could be democratic as a republic should be a hell of a dictatorship!

[@Rotebuehl1]

Why 'or'??? First of all it is impossible, in history, to "return" anywhere Second: the Iranians are all fed up with opression and repression If, and only if, the monarchy establishes, maintains, and promotes democracy and freedom, then it might have chance Not for the sake of the form of statehood, but for the sake of the nation and the people

[@gabrielpaulino2791]

this was a very quiet clip 😅

[@sidhussain915]

Dear Iranians talk to each other and get to a agreement between government and public the overseas should not forget where they are from and help your country invest develop take all what you have learnt back to Iran you are all Persians with rich history.

[@aland5692]

If you listen to their chants in Iran they are also saying " REZA SHAH ROOHAT SHAD" which means they are for Reza pahlavi. They would not have called for greatness Pahlavi dynasty if they did not want Reza Pahlavi! Make sense?

[@waifuhunter9709]

This chants ( which by the way i chanted them alot near meydoone azadi) are only applies to reza shah pahlavi who were thrown out 40 years ago We are not talking about a oppurtunist bandwagoner like his son Who did nothing but party in bars and drink with his family wealth. We dont want ro replace mullah with another incopetent ruler like his son. So... You dont live in iran do you? If you did, you would know If you live jn iran then get out of your bubble and talk with some peole

[@mohammadbeygi9130]

bro thay are also say for pahalvi dynasy and princess reza pahlavi from novomber 2019 to todey! more than other opposion !

[@mohammadbeygi9130]

@@waifuhunter9709 bro they are also say for princes reza pahlavi from november 2019 to todey ! more other opposion ! go in street and ask people ! must of them just know princess reza pahlavi not other opposion !go in street and ask and from 2018 they are saying monarchy to to todey first time was near of cyrus the great .

[@mohammadbeygi9130]

@@waifuhunter9709 h

[@mohammadbeygi9130]

@@waifuhunter9709 You told a very big lie to a foreigner! You say go to the streets of Iran and ask about Prince Reza Pahlavi. People don't know him. This is because whatever polls are conducted among the opposition of the government, Prince Reza Pahlavi comes first!

[@gha1934]

These two terms aren't opposites, rookie mistake. most democratic countries are constitutional monarchies.

[@Digmen1]

I think it will need someone or a party to lead the revolution. But that will be hard to find. I hope the protesters can keep going until they topple Kohmeni and Riasa. But the Republican guard is so strong. Make lists of their names and addresses.

[@ariaebrahimi3629]

It's interesting you put this two against each other

[@Southernburrito]

I think 43+yrs to stew over policy with free unrestricted educational resources & informational outlets at your disposal would prove worthy to motivate & create familiarity that’s most proficient above & beyond adversaries in the comforts of their own imaginations proven waste. I’m happy it’s personal for that reason, his intimacy for overseeing with wisdom could be extraordinary. If Iran could only be so lucky to have a Reza such as them back in its presence. Is Iran not blind to the heights from which its fallen? I pray for their youth. I pray they want freedom & have the strength to take it. They have a leader with a heart waiting & America will hold him for them in hopes they one day ready.

[@pm6754]

just one little fact monarchy can be democratic so your videos title is a big lie another fact is that we will do what our people want.

[@MohamadLevel0]

#KingRezaPahlavi‌II #IranRevolution #MEPeaceWithPahlavi #IraniansStandsWithIsrael

[@pulpfiction1123]

I am married to an iranian. Reading this comment section makes me sad. Y'all are so divided between who is part of the diaspora and who is on the ground fighting. Talking as if those on the ground fighting are the most virtuous and those who left dont deserve the same sort of respect. But from what i understand....people like my husband been fighting for over 30 years....his parents ushered in the revolution, not him. But y'all were either too young or too ignorant to join forces with him before he left. Nobody protested for his human rights when he left for his safety. Try to be more diplomatic with each other. You sound like divided americans trying to one up each other in virtue. Eventually it became a hopeless cause for my husband to talk to ignorant friends and family who didn't want to acknowledge the problems of the regime long ago. So he left. It was not easy starting over. In fact, here in america he has more challenges than most of his family in tehran now. There is virtue to be found in his own journey and now he is addicted to supporting and watching what is going on inside iran today If you cannot be civil and respectful and united now...what do you expect to achieve in the future? (PS...do not incorporate any social polices of the western culture of the past 30 years...they are designed to enslave you in other ways) Best wishes for a free iran

[@whoiscaptaincook]

i think a federal republic would be good, as Iran is so diverse in terms of ethnicities, religilious beliefs etc..this would remove a lot of tension caused by the Islamic Republic in terms of the shah: he is too polarizing as the older generation remebers him either good or extremely bad. I liked the statement he gave couple of days ago where he said that he will not candidate for some position.

[@eggisfun4217]

I remember a guy who commented on a video talking about how he is Iranian, and his dad used to visit Iran every year but he didn't like the Shah, but when the Islamic Republic was established he never went to Iran or even talked about it I'm not sure his name but i remember this comment vividly i think a parliamentary monarchy like the UK would be best

[@whoiscaptaincook]

@@eggisfun4217 at the end of the day, it has to be a political system that respects every Iranian - regardless of ethnicity, religious beliefs etc..

[@aryanshamlou4153]

The only alternative for us Iranians is Prince Reza Pahlavi. He can build Iran again, a prosperous and modern Iran as well as a peaceful and beautiful Middle East without war like 45 years ago.

[@mehdibiparva2261]

As Iranian I would have absolute democracy

[@ggCA07]

dumb

[@geekprofessor3935]

Like Afghanistan and Iraq😂😂

[@dantegoat8568]

Ah not a great a idea. Parliamentary Monarchy is absolutely necessary if you want Iran to still exist. it's a better system, total democracy for a half industrialized country surrounded by ambitious, powerful, stable countries that all want a piece of it (whether economically, territorially, or ideologically) = complete chaos, best case scenario it ends with a coup (like 1953), worst case scenario the government and the country dissolves into mini states. there's a reason a secular parliament with a weak monarch didn't work last time, ended with a British coup. we simply don't posses the privilege for a complete democracy, we're a nation with only 60% Persian speakers, with many neighbors funding seperatist movements, attempting coups and hoping for our downfall. our national interests are against everybody else's interests (specially Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia) regardless of what or who is in charge by the way, simply trying to build a successful Iran means a less successful them. Not to mention the western countries' interest is also; at least for now - in a weak Iran, which is again, regardless of who is in charge (don't forget they played a part in the very same 1979 revolution even with a pro-secular pro-western shah) If we enact such a thing, the most ideal outcome of it would be another coup with a dictator, the realistic outcome corruption or civil war, the worst outcome that could occur with enough Saudi and Turkey money is total dissolving of Iran; If you wish to avoid this outcome - You will want a Monarch a Parliament, and I'd even say the said monarch needs a lot more power than the western Monarchs due to the reasons I mentioned (half industrialized, very low education on average for population, etc)

[@filippovismara7889]

@@dantegoat8568 monarchy Is democratic is stupid write like opposite

[@filippovismara7889]

@@dantegoat8568 I think its Better a Costitutional Monarchy Iran needs a stronger leader

[@stand.with.Iranians]

People are protesting in the streets of Iran, and you are promoting attitudes if Iran goes back to monarchy or other form of government. The truth is that ordinary Iranians had enough from Shah and Shaikh. Ideally, Iranians experts inside and outside Iran will educate people to have a general election what they prefer to have. Please stop romantesizing about the future of Iran. Instead, help people on the streets who risk their lives for basic human rights and freedom.

[@ilikeshroomgals]

I think it will be a autocracy maybe secular like tirkey after ww1

[@anac4950]

Constitutional monarchy. It’s stable and modern enough.

[@yaghuobkanan]

King of Iran return to Iran✌️❤

[@RoyalFalcon777]

Reza Pahlavi is not only the right person but the best one to be in the leadership of Iran and most people love him 💙🌈🦄

[@waifuhunter9709]

Agha reza, do you even live in iran ? Because if you do, you would know that 1- we hate a opportunist like reza pahlavi who does not care about iran 2- we are not bleeding in streets to take back iran then give it away to another incopetent worthless trash, we dont plan to replace mulla with another substitude 3-what does reza pahlavi even know about leadership? Exactly? All he did was blowing money in bars. And make some interviews when we went to streets in iran 4- when we are bleeding in streets he is partying in bard ,drinking. He does not deserve to be allowed inside of iran let alone being anywhere near power structure. If he tries to get power after we throw out mulla, he will suffer just like mullah going to suffer This is stand of youth in iran Everybody knows this🤷‍♂️ Unless you live in bubble or live outside of iran

[@ggCA07]

saying democracy and monarchy polar opposites is really stupid. monarchies CAN be democracies

[@nimash6273]

And Constitutional Monarchies are even better than Republics. ✌🌹🌷🤴

[@ggCA07]

@@nimash6273 they r.

[@alhashmy1310]

Why you guys don't talk about other groups in Iran like Kurds, Arabs, Baluch and Azari?

[@nimash6273]

Are you kidding me? It is the young generation who loves Reza Pahlavi as a King! they are the ones who chant his name, and his grandfather's name inside Iran! ✌🌹🌷🤴

[@yaqubebased1961]

Reza Pahlavi doesn't have what it takes otherwise he'd have claimed his birthright through conquest by now, like many other shahs of old. But he didn't do shit. They just took off and never came back

[@nimash6273]

We want a constitutional Monarchy, like Sweden, Norway, Japan, England, etc. It fits better with our history and culture. We already have a very bad experience with Republic. Show me one Republic that has worked better than a Monarchy in Asia or anywhere else in the world. A republic just doesn't work for Iran either. Long Live King Reza II ✌🌹🌷🤴♥

[@persianpatriot3888]

We want the king

[@masey23]

Until Iranians are able to think outside the complex of either a monarchy or an Islamic theocracy, we will never move forward. Both are unjust at their core. Those showing their support for the Shah are showing their hypocrisy. A free Iran is an Iran free of religious bigotry AND American/Western imperialism and influence. Peace and love for Iran ✌🏼

[@awkwardariya3366]

How about no government because you don’t need to be a slave. Or maybe you enjoy being a slave

[@fmsstudio6316]

Yes all this is just to restore a failed dynasty that is forgotten in all but a few circles of materialist Persians who use the situation now to say see how great it was then let's go back to that. Nobody is chanting Pahlavi this is a joke. We don't want any kings or princes. Whether the Shah did good things or bad is not the point the larger point is people were at the mercy of his personal decisions with no voice.

[@keeschill6076]

After qajar it should have been sardar Assad bakhtiari not pahlavi’s who came to power by a power outside of Iran

[@omidsouri7326]

This title that you've chosed for your program is not proper because in this way you're showing the only way to reach democracy is by every kind of political system except monarchy and that is not true as one of the members of new generation I say that we want back to what we had in the past :nationalism secularism modernism that Iran reached during the pahlavi's dynasty and this title shows that you are totally unaware about the whole world that 98% of the anarchism regimes today are republic but look at the most democratic countries in the world right now like Norway Sweden Netherlands Denmark Spain Luxembourg Canada new Zealand Australia England that their political system is constitutional parlamental monarchy and their citizens live in progressive and sophisticated country at the end toward the host that said it has gone a long time around 44 years and it is rare to return to monarchy I gonna mention this point that in Spain after a long period like this monarchy returned to Spain and again this country started to follow the way of being a first world progressive and sophisticated country again may God bless our great country forever long live the king ( javid shah)👑👑👑🌹🌹🌹2reza3pahlavi

[@unclehousy-leotardo]

Hossein Khosrow Ali Vaziri, is the only clear alternative leader. He will humble them.

[@aland5692]

ha ha.funny

[@RoyalFalcon777]

Who !???

[@unclehousy-leotardo]

@@RoyalFalcon777 Olympic gold metal winner, former body guard of the shah, former heavy weight champion of the world better known as the iron sheik

[@RoyalFalcon777]

@@unclehousy-leotardo Yes he is good man surely but not for the leadership of Iran !

[@mohammadabdi9178]

what do u smoke? crack? HE IS 80 YEARS old... even in freaking WWE they would mock him and u want him to be a leader ? lol

[@YTStyla]

As Reza Pahlavi is pretty much the only leader figure in the opposition, I think a constitutional monarchy would be a good idea for now. Alternatively he could be an elected president, but I would actually prefer a female president. But baby steps…

[@awkwardariya3366]

Patrick you’re being naive- CIA is trying to do regime change- Iran is a sovereign country- get prof. Marandi on to balance debate instead of only only these western ‘Iranians’ who haven’t been to Iran in 40 years

[@Hermesborugerdian]

Let’s not forget that all the other protests that happened previous to this one like in Aban and Esfand were essentially monarchist riots in many cities. I understand that in the diaspora monotheism is associated with older generation however inside IRAN there is a whole merging generation that referred to as the “Manoto generation” these kids who won with successful monarch is propaganda that tried to dismiss ir’s anti-Pahlavi propaganda and accusations

[@edjafa]

What do you mean with this Democracy or monarchy, Sweden and Holland and Denmark and other places have constitutional monarchy and are run more democratically than the USA which has a presidential system. The content is more important than the name and plus 3000 years of history would have something to do with it. The allegiance of a true constitutional monarch is to its people irrespective of the political divide but a presidents allegiance is to the party that voted for him, hence the chaos you see in American politics for the past 20 years.

[@aquila4228]

Even inside the muslin world, constitutional monarchies are the best most free countries. Look at Morocco and Jordan, that would be a good path for Iran

[@The_Christian_Cavalier]

Become democracy, become dictatorship- again.

[@alireact1827]

They don't know what the want this people. Freedom means Netflix and dance and Hollywood for them

[@waifuhunter9709]

For all people who are in delusion thinking that pahlavi gonna return or other people related to him gonna return and people gonna accept them, i have one sentence شتر‌ در خواب بیند پنبه دانه گهی لپ لپ خورد گه دانه دانه Next government have to be build with people who actually worked and fought inside iran in this situation Bandwagoners like pahlavi ilk are incopetent and people see right through them Other people juat speak in their safe space while we are bleeding in streets. Even patrick is not welcomed as leader even if he wants to try. Simply he is supporting from distance. But he is not fighting inside of country Thats a big diffrrence for peoplelike ali karimi

[@RoyalFalcon777]

شاهزاده و امثال شاهزاده داشتن جنگ میکردن از ۴۴ ساله پیش. من خودم ۱۷ سالگی تیر خوردم و هنوز هم جنگ میکنم و میدونم که خیلی ها در این ۴۴ سال تلفات دادن ! حالا تو کی هستی که بگی شتر خواب میبینه ؟! این انقلاب از کوی دانشگاه شروع شد تا به اینجا رسیده ! ایران به همه نیاز داره که براش دل میسوزونن ! حالا برو اتحاد رو یاد بگیر تا کلهُ گندت سر جاشه !

[@ashishbajracharya9417]

Why not socialist iran🤔

[@ilovepizza45]

I think fedralism is the best option. Iran is a rich and big country with many «iranic» nation and languages etc. so a fedral state where people focus on selvgoverning. Iran can be a big fedral state if also other iranic nation joined

[@whoiscaptaincook]

Absolutely! Regardless of the System: i just hope that the people of Iran can decide whats best for the

[@dantegoat8568]

ah You want Yugoslavia 2? no thank you.

[@ilovepizza45]

@@dantegoat8568 so what do you think about the 5 ethnic groups living in Iran? They all have different languages, religion and etc. future Iran can never be a majority vs minority again. The country needs to be a fedral system where different provinces rule themself

[@ilovepizza45]

@@dantegoat8568 i dont want a centralizied goverment that only opress

[@dantegoat8568]

@@ilovepizza45 central government is necessary, the only reason iran became minoritized is due to bad geography and outside oppression, the iranic minorities such as kurds, azeris, baloch, we all spoke one language, and this is coming from me from an azeri-mazandarani family; unity is necessary, federalization = geopolitical neighbors rigging elections and the country to fall apart, if iran is federalized it's only a matter of time before it's destroyed. the only ones pushing for federalization are people that either want that or aren't educated enough and are too naive; central government is the only way a country with so much disunity can survive, and a central government does not mean oppression; it simply means the structure is more top-down, if you look at the achamenid iran model, it fell apart largely thanks to how every region had it's own local "shah" or king, in such a system a single storm like alexander was enough to knock the entire house of cards down; and all you want is to repeat history?

[@reza-vi2yg]

your guests are so wrong

[@ARse-ko7lz]

constitutional monarchy

[@vinijr_best5925]

Monarchy = peace

[@ahmedzouaoui8177]

Monarchy=Poverty

[@WolfSS88]

​@@ahmedzouaoui8177 Strange that poverty also lives in republic countries, either you are blind or pure stupid.

[@mohammdhass1856]

I think your missing a point because if you truly want a fast transition and a new iran the monarchy is your only way because you all are talking about democracy and all this fancy words but you are forgetting the Iranian army if you don't have them on your side there is no way you can make any changes because the the revolutionary gard dos not car how much people thy kill to stop this the only way is a proper deal between the monarchy old grad and the army to support them

[@MaryChitgar]

Nazanine Nour is clueless af

[@grawakendream8980]

or 3. continue to be controlled by the theocracy. the most likely

[@themacfarlaneranch3342]

Hell yea playa

[@Tom-hr9ge]

Wrong question. Right now Iran is a constitutional multi party democracy, however it is theocratic. The question should be can Iran be a secular democracy where the oil goes to advancing the country. That’s how it was under mossadegh. Shah was secular but un democratic and did not use the oil to advance the country. The current Iranian government is democratic and uses the oil to advance the country but it is not secular. Under Mossadegh it was secular democratic and the oil was used to advance the nation.

[@marmary5555]

You can't put words like "democracy" and the "Islamic Republic" in the same sentence when half the population has no equal rights. How was it "under Mossadegh", exactly? He was supported and financed by mullahs and the clerics, and also backed by the traitorous Tudeh party. Also, he was never elected by the people. He was appointed by the Shah. The Shah appointed the Prime Minister. Not the people. pro-regime fanboys have no rights to give lessons on democracy

[@willbygosh4887]

Probably a secular democracy or possibly an autocracy in the future.The women would be much happier regardless,they're just sick of this gender aparthied for the past 43 years. years.Democracy would be more favorable but not sure if this would happen due to the religious extremism there.

[@ferozeahmad8336]

Do whatever propaganda you going to do! The islamic rev will stay till ♾️

[@bobm6360]

No body wants kings and queens anymore anywhere in the world 🤪

[@waifuhunter9709]

Promise me, in iran , we really dont that coward opportunist near oir country

[@sisygambis.]

cope harder

[@awkwardariya3366]

I give up- stop begging for ‘democracy’ which is a scam

[@MrLegendra]

The monarch and their draconian religion are too powerful

[@Highlander999]

Its already a democratic country

[@marmary5555]

Nice joke