Wind Energy and Wind Power Density

[@AdnanSelimovic1998]

Hey Djordje, one question...actually two...at the end, did you maybe calculate the energy density for 2 years or am I missing something? Also, should it be 4,73GJ and not 47,3GJ? Radim diplomski na temu modeliranja vjetroparka, pa me svaki detalj zanima haha..Sve najbolje! p.s. Perfect explanation!

[@DjordjeRomanic]

You are right. It should be 2 years and one decimal point to the left. Thanks for noticing this and thanks for your nice words. For you and all other viewers, always double-check the numbers. I do these calculations only once because my focus here is on concepts. Good luck with your thesis!

[@AdnanSelimovic1998]

@@DjordjeRomanic Thanks! Wish you all the best!

[@georgewagah2533]

I'm grateful that I found this video. I am looking forward to more

[@gulabjamun6897]

Good one thanks

[@hurricaneilija]

What kind of whiskey do you prefer, sir?

[@DjordjeRomanic]

Crown Royal Canadian Whiskey. Give it a shot both literally and figuratively.

[@rastyisanerd3686]

Thanks mate

[@DjordjeRomanic]

Happy to help.

[@Boca-do-rio]

Then i have a good solution to create that. The problem with vertical blades is the power increase of the wind, where they need to use brakes or to shut them down. A second problem is the distance to the mainland from wind turbines at sea. I'ff power increase of the wind brings the most proffit, i would combine 3 major emplefires and exclude 1 that costs energie. To bad i have no investers.

[@DjordjeRomanic]

Go for it.

[@grahamflowers]

There is no kinetic energy in the wind there is force Mv squared kinetic energy is the energy of consistent work from a consistent force regards Graham Flowers

[@grahamflowers]

Betz limit has been smashed and debunked .wind pushes what it touches it can't push on the gaps between the blades. there is no kinetic energy in the wind there is force Mv squared kinetic energy is the energy of consistent work from a consistent force regards Graham Flowers