With respect, supreme court hasn’t done well -Martin Kpebu reacts to suspension of speaker’s ruling

With respect, supreme court hasn’t done well - martin Kpebu reacts to suspension of speaker’s ruling ||The Key Points on TV3
Don't forget to subscribe for more updates.
Visit www.3news.com/ for more.
Subscribe for more Updates: goo.gl/70xoB
TV3 First in News Best in Entertainment.

[@mabeldomie3413]

My humble appeal to all Ghanaians,if we really love this nation, let us all vote massively against NPP because of the judges in the supreme court to save Ghana.

[@amanorteyhonu3208]

When will the Supreme Court realise that a certain constituency (SALL) hasn't had representation since 2021 and apply same urgency?😢

[@Ayerkihagan1481]

The moment you sympathize with NPP you automatically suspend your thinking and common sense 😢sad!

[@abdulkarimsuleiman9959]

No honest person with common sense will support the NPP.

[@maamemyk9756]

The supreme court has to be disolved, period!!! It is no more independent!!

[@michaelmaurice7679]

Besides being dissolved, in my opinion I think these judges have to be treated just as those judges because their characters is a threat to Ghana's democracy.

[@alhajihuduyahaya6149]

Kpebu said na wo Nye ade (meaning the guy wasn’t good in class ) 😂😂😂

[@oscarmawutor3170]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@alexmartey5798]

Martin, are you sure the judges are as knowledgeable as you are?

[@NtowKwame-o7y]

Supreme court, stay in your lane let parliament do its work, parliament stay in your lane do your work, we haven't gotten to the declaration stage yet.

[@felixkommey2505]

That is the problem with NPP. They think they know yet they don't and then they begin push the ignorance down they throat of everybody.

[@kelvinadu3885]

today Supreme Court cares about representation? 😂😂😂 the people of Sall don't have MP that is close to 4 years now

[@Ayerkihagan1481]

This matter eeh!!!!

[@felixkommey2505]

Lawyer you see the essence of just passing people. He is disgracing you not because you don't know, he is disgracing you because you allowed him through. Even service of writ to he does not know.

[@NornooCeasermyleseaser]

the guy just came to embarrass his teacher and cause him regret.

[@norbertgaglo8727]

Ghana's problems are all pointing to actions and inactions of Unanimous FC.

[@frankosei-gyamfi2077]

When Ato Forson was set free by the same Unanimous fc, it was justice served right. This isn't long ago if you think people are having short memory like mahama said. I won't be surprised if he was referring to the NDC members.

[@spencerashiboye4168]

@@frankosei-gyamfi2077wasn’t the supreme court Was the appeals court 😂 I don’t know much about he law but how is the court telling the parliament how to handle its affairs??

[@frankosei-gyamfi2077]

@@spencerashiboye4168 you see, the supreme court is there to interpret the laws made by parliament. For the purposes of checks and balances, the supreme Court can call parliament to order when overstepping its boundaries in the interpretation of the laws.

[@overcouth]

What happened to the SAL suit??

[@Immanuelphronesis]

The SC don't care about that!

[@IronLady-h2p]

​@@Immanuelphronesiswhy can't you guys leave Ghana for another place and give Ghana peace ? Our courts are not there to treat ndc with kids gloves and you can't dictate to them ! Ndc influence and power has ended everything on earth has an end except the word of GOD ! GIVE GHANA A BREAK ! WE ARE MOVING FORWARD

[@Immanuelphronesis]

@@IronLady-h2p why can't some of you reason beyond partisanship?Must everything revolve around npp and ndc?.For once use your coconut.mtcchew

[@georgekissi3741]

Unanimous FC ampa

[@politicallyafrican6317]

Hmmm expectant in coming NDC Attorney General. Response is expected.😂

[@akurubillafarms]

The supreme court has lost its credibility totally likewise the EC. Eiiiii, Ghana under Akuffo Addo is cursed.

[@League-fix]

Ghanaians waited and were listening to NPP lies until everything is destroyed. Now what?

[@simondzreke2523]

A poorly informed perspective might lead one to believe that the Supreme Court is the proper venue for this matter. However, after reviewing the judgment from the Supreme Court, it's clear that it states this is a human rights violation issue. According to the 1992 Constitution, this makes the Supreme Court an inappropriate venue for the case. The correct avenue for addressing this matter is the high court, since the Supreme Court has identified it as related to human rights. Furthermore, the initial filing is anticipatory, meaning the alleged incident has not yet occurred; therefore, no actual harm has been inflicted. Additionally, the Majority Leader does not represent the constituencies involved. Moreover, the Supreme Court's assertion that the affected Members of Parliament (MPs) were not heard is both egregious and misguided. Those MPs were not denied the opportunity to be seated, making this assertion nonsensical and an example of judicial malpractice.

[@bounzgotkeys164]

NDC will today praise the judiciary, tomorrow insults and denigrate them! After the court declared Ato forson rulling , the NDC was praising the judiciary, so why now the comments here are suggesting that the npp has influenced the judiciary. The supporters of the NDC should be worried about the kind of party leadership they have now, because they don’t tell you the truth … they knew what will be the end results of what the Speaker did.

[@akurubillafarms]

I always pray and seek forgiveness from God that He should forgive me for voting for this evil NPP party in 2016 and 2020. The worse of it was that, i convinced most of my relatives to vote for them too. Hmmmm. The mistake i will never forget.

[@felixkommey2505]

If supreme court can choose cases then parliament and the speaker can also choose to do what is in the interest of Parliament

[@dehyeba1404]

I think One of the things Mahama must do when he assumes power is to amend the constitution. The supreme court judges positions must be set at 9 and electable. These disgraceful judges are doing the bidding of Akuffo Addo because he was the one that put them there. They can’t be loyal to the nation and it people. We must change this course by having them elected

[@victoreshun7606]

Pebu suppose to know that speaker alone can not mend the law nd therefore he can not say is only monays he can be served of any court order!

[@simondzreke2523]

The speaker did not amend any part of the Constitution; rather, it highlights your understanding, which led to your lack of judicial activism and legal jurisprudence.

[@jerryantwiboasiako2236]

Nonsense, so where was the haste also for the speakers pronouncement when he could have waited for the courts interpretation the law

[@agyekumessien688]

Kpebu should go away with his nonsense. If the Supreme Court had sat on a Saturday to hear this matter, his comments would have been same if not even worst. Self interest nkoaa

[@mila2742]

But who called you here? Wo kyiri nokor3😂😂

[@Cappie805]

You lack common sense.

[@lovelaceowusu-asante7212]

Sometimes when I hear Martin Kpebu speaks gibberish. , I wonder if he’s still a lawyer or not ?

[@afiherman6053]

Why don't you go and teach as the law, moa

[@Ayerkihagan1481]

You are a robot. Simply senseless 😂

[@simondzreke2523]

What do you know about legal and judicial activities? By your comment, even if I attended law school, I can still teach you common law.

[@mila2742]

I always see you writing gibberish 😂

[@lovelaceowusu-asante7212]

@@mila2742 seems like you can’t read

[@johnsarpong9754]

Martin kpebu what do you know? You better shut up. Your opinion is absolutely corrupted and biased.

[@afiherman6053]

Share your knowledge then...ofui

[@simondzreke2523]

A poorly informed perspective might lead one to believe that the Supreme Court is the proper venue for this matter. However, after reviewing the judgment from the Supreme Court, it's clear that it states this is a human rights violation issue. According to the 1992 Constitution, this makes the Supreme Court an inappropriate venue for the case. The correct avenue for addressing this matter is the high court, since the Supreme Court has identified it as related to human rights. Furthermore, the initial filing is anticipatory, meaning the alleged incident has not yet occurred; therefore, no actual harm has been inflicted. Additionally, the Majority Leader does not represent the constituencies involved. Moreover, the Supreme Court's assertion that the affected Members of Parliament (MPs) were not heard is both egregious and misguided. Those MPs were not denied the opportunity to be seated, making this assertion nonsensical and an example of judicial malpractice.

[@ThePilgrimProgress]

Your country Ghana is becoming a banana Republic, thanks to a politically partisan judiciary. I understand your president bailed out the crumbling business of your chief justice's hubby, so it follows therefore that the CJ is compromised in the first place. As an Africa watcher, I track political malfeasance and this is one example of a judicial corruptocracy in tandem with a lawless executive trying to strangle the most important arm of government. It is the same Supreme Court that denied the constituents of Quayson a representation in parliament. It is the same Supreme Court that sent the people of Sall into electoral extinction by its connivance with your ruling party. As a lawyer, I can cite so many flawed interpretation of your laws by a compromised judiciary, especially where a lunatic government decides to misrule by nepotistic Court packing. It is here that your legislature comes into prominence by asserting its defiance to autocracy. Your constitution is not dissimilar from so many democratic constitutions of this world which are good case studies and does not require a political hack of a judicial appointee to lend abstruse interpretation to upend its efficacy and the rule of law. Your legislature should be courageous to debunk such senseless intrusions by defying the lawless and reckless unelected fools donning some political robes to torpedoe your constitution in such shameless manner. What happened to precedence in legal litigation????

[@fummeyfrederick3306]

Well said 👏🏽

[@Immanuelphronesis]

@@ThePilgrimProgress Succinctly put✅

[@maamemyk9756]

calling a spade a spade!!! The court is compromised!!!