Wittmann's Tiger Rampage | Villers-Bocage, June 1944

In the space of 15 minutes, Michael Wittmann took a single Tiger tank and stopped a major British advance, destroying 10 tanks, 10 halftracks, 8 Bren carriers, 1 scout car and a six-pounder anti-tank gun in the process.
An eye-catching achievement… But was this a victory handed on a plate?
John Delaney outlines Wittmann’s audacious and decisive action at Villers Bocage against the British Desert Rats, examining its military significance.
It’s become the stuff of legend. It was a gift to Nazi propagandists, who wasted no time in championing the achievements of their “tank ace”. For the British, it was an embarrassing blow to military prestige.
Wittmann got lucky. But luck runs out eventually…
00:00 | Introduction
00:42 | Arrival into Villers-Bocage
03:08 | Wittmann's Rampage Begins
04:51 | Rampaging Through the Village
11:56 | Wittmann's Luck Runs Out
14:09 | Was Wittmann Really a Tank Ace?
16:54 | Conclusion
This video features archive footage courtesy of British Pathé.
◈ Created by The Tank Museum
#tankmuseum #tankactions #johndelaney #michaelwittmann #tigertank

[@Karras353]

Now see here, the crews did not stop for tea. They stopped for a vital planning meeting that happened to include tea. 😁

[@kerrydennison7947]

Captain Willie Whitelaw squadron got ambushed by 3 hunting Panthers were they were having their tea break and officers meeting. And the American task force welborn got ambushed by the king tigers that led up to the death of general Rose of the 3rd armored division. Traveling without flank security without reconnaissance can lead to a very deadly ambush.

[@Karras353]

No arguments here, I was just making light of the meme about us Brits always stopping for tea. Heaven forbid that soldiers might need a break and some refreshments in between getting shot at! Just maybe take a few precautions when doing so.

[@NickGillings-vf3ye]

@@Karras353They didn’t stop for tea , they had tea because they’d stopped .

[@Karras353]

@@NickGillings-vf3ye Exactly my point. I'm not the enemy on this one.

[@NickGillings-vf3ye]

@@Karras353 Indeed 👍

[@arl-4452]

Never forgotten, Cheers to "Rex" Ingram, M3 Stuart commander who faced the Tiger with all he got, bravest soul in Villers-Bocage

[@2PaweL]

He gave his young life to save his friends.

[@shaider1982]

I think he was mentioned by Lazerpig in his video on the engagement.

[@Jerico1900]

He killed himself and his friends, for what?

[@Personontheinternet4598]

@@Jerico1900to distract the tiger and alert the others

[@Jerico1900]

@@Personontheinternet4598 🤣Yeah I'm sure the explosions and and gun fire didn't alert annyone🤣🤣🤣

[@SynapseDriven]

Imagine being in a Stuart and finding yourself facing a Tiger, that Ingram was a badass.

[@bloke755]

" Poop in the Pants " moment ............. 😬😬😬😬

[@TerryKnight-hw3pg]

Or suicidal.

[@theart8039]

@@bloke755 He drove straight at Wittmann so I don't think he pooped his pants..it's that rare thing called courage because I'm guessing he had a pretty good idea that he would die

[@102ndsmirnov7]

@@theart8039 I presume he knew his chances of survival were limited either way so he did the brave thing and tried to save others.

[@gavinwilliams4755]

Thanks for the film. My Great Uncle Rennie FitzHugh was one of the casualties on the day. His body was never found and he is commamerated at the Bauxeux Cemetery. Gone but not forgotten.

[@andrewflindall9048]

If memory serves, the sons of the lady of the manor were granted permission to recover and bury the British dead. I believe some of the graves were lost to the subsequent bombing of the town. He does get remembered.

[@davidstone-haigh4880]

RIP. My father was in Egypt, aged 19. Incredible what their generation faced.

[@otterspocket2826]

My Great Uncle, Reg Knight, was a Firefly driver with B Sqn back in the town. He survived the war, but his best mate was killed in the action later in the day.

[@TTTT-oc4eb]

A Canadian Sherman tanker in Normandy put it this way; "No matter how well you are trained, without luck you won't survive."

[@flammenjc]

You make your own luck. And being skilled helps massively.

[@57thorns]

Now, there is a huge difference between being lucky to find an opportunity to grab, and getting lucky and succeed when making a mistake. I do not think Wittmann made a mistake, his actions that day were, as you say yourself, still remarkable. That propaganda runs away with it is just business as usual in war.

[@DeosPraetorian]

Oh it was still a mistake.

[@yedrellow]

@@DeosPraetorian It was still a mistake, but look at the opposing tanks. Mistakes after mistakes after mistakes. Yet Wittman had to go through 29 vehicles before he made his mistake. Yes he needed to be lucky, but that's true for literally everyone in a war.

[@1IbramGaunt]

@@yedrellow well we had the "luck" of having American factories churning out a hundred Shermans in the time it took the Germans to build a single Tiger tank and that's luck that lasted a lot longer than Wittmann's did

[@johnho7422]

was inexcusable by the defense?

[@yedrellow]

@@1IbramGaunt I never disagreed. I just think people have swung extremely far the other way away from "heroism" propaganda to the point of not even acknowledging that when one tank takes out 29 vehicles that it requires some level of skill. It's not an endorsement, just an acknowledgement that sometimes individuals in war can achieve a lot more than those around them when luck and skill combine. Soldiers aren't interchangeable automatons, sometimes some individuals are less prone to error and more capable of capitalising on luck than others.

[@richardthomas598]

You can say he was lucky, and he was. But he was also singularity aggressive and tactically brilliant. Let's say a different officer says "I've been found out" and fights a defensive battle or attacks with a whole platoon of Tiger. The former would have allowed the British to get their act together and given away the initiative. The latter would have been more cumbersome, also giving more time for resistance to pool. Wittmann was audacious without being utterly reckless. That is how you do things like this. Military history is replete with examples. And as for luck, well, Napoleon said he'd rather his marshals be lucky than brilliant.

[@robertmanfredthurrigl9424]

Well put and the last Napoleon comment is amusing !

[@elroyscout]

Eh, his decision to attack personally with his command units instead of waiting for his full command to arrive was a pretty god awful decision. He may have been able to go on a rampage, but practically alone and without infantry support, it was only a matter of time till somebody on the allied side got lucky and popped his treads. He then had to walk back to his HQ, an hour and a half long treck while his unit did nothing and the allies were able to call in reinforcements now that they knew german armor was in the area. When Whittman finally ordered the rest of his unit in, the attack was peacemeal, and the now alert and dug in allies shredded them one tank platoon at a time. At the end of the day the allies lost a few vehicles they replaced within a few days, and whitman had lost dozens of precious panzers including a tiger that were not easy to replace due to the 8th airforce saying 'Nice assembly line there, would be a shame if we carpet bombed the full zipcode around it'. Only reason Whittman ever got another tiger was he bitched and moaned to the party he would go public about him being benched... and then he lost that tiger when he charged a small horde of angry Canadian Shermans, along with his life. Whitman was the kind of scum who strafed ambulances, so good riddance to bad rubbish.

[@likeablekiwi6265]

@@elroyscout Meh, at least he fought to his death. The dude could've just stayed in the rear according to you but he didn't and died... you could say the fame got to him, but he died for a cause nevertheless, the kind of action that emboldens others, not just his own.

[@GarrisonNichols-ow1hb]

Say what you want about the Tiger. It being expensive and complicated to build and it's a maintenance nightmare but there's no doubt that when it was operated by a professional crew it was an extremely effective beast.

[@EllisJohnstone]

True

[@lyndoncmp5751]

Especially in open country where it could use its gun to great effect, such as Estrees la Campagne during Operation Totalize.

[@chuckhaggard1584]

In this case the Brits being caught off guard was a huge factor. That Firefly not being caught unaware could have easily resulted in Whitman being wrecked right from the get go, exactly in the way he was eventually killed soon after this battle

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@chuckhaggard1584 Wittmann was later killed by ambush on his flank though. He didn't even see what was firing at him, so it was a bit different to Villers. At Villers the British tanks on the road up to Point 213 were visible to him and he was facing them frontally. I always thought he was further away from the tanks at the lead of the British column than the representation shows here.

[@chuckhaggard1584]

@@lyndoncmp5751 my point stands. If he hadn't caught them with their pants down the two Fireflies would have made a wreck of his tank. The Brit's screwed up big time being that near the very fluid front line without recon working and no screen line deployed. They had scouts, towards the rear of the column, that's unbelievably dumb. That his Tiger was knocked out by a lowly 57mm gun speaks to how lucky he was to not be fired on by all the other potential guns involved in this mess. I'm aware of how Whittman met his end.

[@jaymacpherson8167]

One of the best presentations by The Tank Museum.

[@lkchild]

While Lazerpig’s videos are fun, Dan Taylor of the Kent & Sharpshooters Yeomanry museum is the man who’s done the recent research in this battle - his book is eye opening.

[@GM-xk1nw]

Lazerpig’s videos are fun and full of misinformation.

[@astrorick2910]

​@@GM-xk1nw was he wrong about Wittmann?

[@sushi_cat_og5411]

@@GM-xk1nw Elaborate?

[@Marc-vc1wo]

Lazerpig's video and premise are accurate as far as the Nazi regime capitalizing and embellishing on Wittmann's exploits in Normandy, while downplaying Kurt Knispel who was a better tank ace but not a Nazi party member. However, lazerpig forgets or glosses over the fact that Wittmann had already made a name for himself on the Eastern Front, credited with over 90 kills. Wittmann received the Knights Cross of the Iron Cross in early 1944, an award that affirmed his skills as a tank commander. During Citadel Wittmann was credited with 7x tank and 10x AT Guns destroyed in one day; at Zhitomir he was credited with 10 and 10 of each. Wittmann rose from a crewman through tank commander to Platoon Leader of a Tiger Platoon; he also earned a battlefield commission. These activities portray him as an aggressive, at least somewhat proficient leader, yet as pig points out, a sycophant too obedient to party - the sort of person the Nazi's needed as role model. It is also possible the Nazi's were happy to promote the narrative of Wittmann as a star because he was killed shortly after the Normandy battle. A perverse attempt to capitalize on the theory, "your death is not in vain if you die for the fatherland", during a time of increasing casualties and collapsing morale in the Wehrmacht. Edit: change east front figures from 130 to 90.

[@OddBallThe4th8382]

@@Marc-vc1woI have it in mind that Lazapig did in fact mention all that you just said there. At least i’m fairly sure he did

[@nickthenoodle9206]

I seem to remember 1 British officer saying V-B was 3 battles. We lost the 1st, the 2nd was drawn, and the 3rd was won. It's the last one that counts.

[@MothaLuva]

Maybe. But the monument in V-B does not include any Brits.

[@nickthenoodle9206]

????? The monument to the 22nd Armoured Brigade?@@MothaLuva

[@MothaLuva]

@@nickthenoodle9206 No. The monument to Michael Wittmann.

[@dnate697]

@@MothaLuva You mean his headstone?

[@Conn30Mtenor]

​@@dnate697it's a flat stone at La Cambe, a shrine for Neo Nazis. I'm grateful that my countrymen put him there.

[@19explorersport96]

Best description of the battle I have ever seen/heard/read. Well done.

[@gothamgoon4237]

You need to expand your research than. Many things where left out that explain the situation and writing the entire action off as "lucky" and that Wittman was a coward is unforgivable British propaganda and revisionism trying to excuse bad performance on the day by the British.

[@randolphstead2988]

Otto Carius and another panzer commander went on a similar rampage in one of the three small Baltic countries and wiped out 60 Soviet tanks; big ones, the JS2 and such. It would be nice to see a similar analysis. I have to say, this was a very informative video. Well done!

[@michaelkenny8540]

That is what Carius wrote in his book 'Tigers In The Mud'. For July 22nd 1944 he claimed a total 53 Soviets tanks for the Tigers he was with and 58 kills for the whole Unit. Unfortunately (for Carius) at the back of his book he reproduces Period Unit Documents written by the commanding officer of his Unit and this man noted that that day they knocked out............17 Soviet tanks. Someone is making things up.

[@depleteduraniumcowboy3516]

What a harrowing story. I haven't heard about this engagement. What a great job y'all have done in telling it.

[@sakarisaikku6218]

Exceptionally done narrative of a small fragment ofWW2 history! It's one of those truly surprising tank encounters of WW2 that indeed deserve a minute to minute telling of just what happened. Witmann's charge is really one thing that stands out from the tank battles of Normandy. Cheers to the Tank Museum to do this kind of history video! Thanks for the supporters of the Tank Museum that have given the chance to make such awesome recreation of a tiny part of the history of WW2. Hopefully you continue with this kind of historical work further!

[@RJM1011]

He might have been good as a tank commander but he was killed a few weeks later and the German army did not have many like him or the number of tanks they needed. All the tiger tanks lost that day were not replaced as Germany only built 1,200 or just over of them. Thank you for the video and clearing up some of the bs about him.

[@castrogonzalez614]

The german army had a lot of tank "aces" if you want to call them that. Even at the end of the war they were still capable of winning tactical victories (for example at Bautzen or Paderborn)

[@markoleary8810]

Excellent video my sister in laws father was in 8th irish hussars in ww2 and Korea there battle honours include villa bocage and imjin River sadly he past away before my brother met his wife so never got to meet him but my brother has had his service medals and a picture of him in uniform aged about 19 taken in 1944 before the D day framed and proudly on display

[@theemporersnewclothes]

Many tanks for the informative content

[@jamessherman4508]

Brilliant video, thank you for putting it together and sharing!

[@MechaNick767]

This was such a fantastic explanation if this encounter. Thank you Bovington tank museum for making the video and sharing the story. :)

[@rogue_soul]

Great vid. Explained the action so clearly. Thank you!

[@scottchenoweth4937]

This is such a well-made video. Excellent work.

[@ColeDedhand]

When opportunity meets preparation, luck often follows.

[@michaelkenny8540]

There were a couple of RA OP tanks with the HQ Troop on the bend outside Villers. They all turned around and fled back into the town. There is an unpublished account of the battle that describes this event and the narrator says one of the OP tanks got 'hung-up' on a tree trunk that was lying at the side of the road. The driver managed to get his OP free just before the Tiger arrived. If you check the photos of the Panzer Lehr Pz IV that is shown being towed on the bend outside Villers you will see that this Pz IV got hung-up on the same tree trunk. It could not drive off and had to be towed off by another Pz IV. Look closely at the photo16:48 and you will see the muzzle brake of the towing Pz IV is just visble behind the Cromwell and the tree-trunk is sticking out behind the Pz IV .

[@callumgordon1668]

Excellent concise description. Graphics made it so much easier to follow what happened. War appears full of luck and chance. If Capt. Dyas’, who I saw interviewed many years ago, gunner had been in his place, Wittman’s career might have ended that day, rather than during Totalize.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

But Wittmann was actually hit in the flank by another Cromwell and it didn't penetrate, so I doubt the Cromwell of Dyas would have penetrate the Tiger's rear, which was slightly stronger than the side, due to the 8 degrees angle. Both the side and rear were 80mm thick.

[@callumgordon1668]

@@lyndoncmp5751 “Early models of the Cromwell were equipped with the QF 6-pounder (57 mm). Using the new armour-piercing discarding sabot round, which became available in quantity in early 1944, this gun could penetrate over 100 mm of steel armour at ranges on the order of 1,000 yards (910 m), making it effective against all but the most heavily armoured tanks.” The rear armour of a Tiger is 88mm and Dyas would have been firing from virtually point blank. Like many in 7th armoured, he was a veteran of the Western Desert, not new to combat. At the very least Wittman would have been disabled. As he was a little later by a 6pdr gun… however it’s still if but and maybe.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@callumgordon1668 None of the three Cromwell shots that actually hit Wittmanns Tiger (2 from Dyas, 1 from Carr) penetrated or even slowed Wittmann down. And those three shots were at point blank range. Dont forget the Tiger I had unique extremely high quality nickel -steel of 265 Brinell Hardness in places. Paper penetrations often failed to materialise in actuality, especially when we include firing angles. I doubt Dyas would have waited to be perfectly perpendicular to Wittmann's rear before firing, and possibly would have shot from an angle thus making penetration unlikely. Wittmanns Tiger was hit by the 6 pounder in the running gear apparently. I don't think Dyas would have been targeting the tracks.

[@callumgordon1668]

@@lyndoncmp5751 and all those shots were targeting its thickest armour, so they reacted as you describe. Point blank onto thinner rear armour may have had a different outcome. There is a case (disputed) where a Greyhound AC took out a Tiger II by rapidly firing at its engine deck. If the AT gun crew, which regardless disabled the Tiger in the prescribed manner had been quicker with their small arms, his career might have ended there too…

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@callumgordon1668 That was almost certainly a Panther that the Greyhound took out near St Vith during the Bulge. There were no King Tigers, or Tiger Is, anywhere near St Vith. Nearest were at Stavelot, Trois Ponts and La Gleize. Plus the Tiger losses are documented and recorded. Only 13 Tigers were lost in the northern section of the Bulge. All documented and dated, with turret numbers listed. None at St Vith. Panthers were frequently called Tigers. King Tigers had 80mm sloped rear armour. No Greyhound is getting through that. The Panther 'only' had 40mm rear armour however. Lastly, seeing as most people in the tanks Wittmann hit and penetrated actually survived, it's very probable Wittmann would have survived too, even if one of the less powerful allied shells penetrated so he may have carried on in another Tiger later. I believe Carr's Cromwell hit the side of Wittmann's Tiger turret? Not quite sure. That was 80mm, same as the rear. It didn't penetrate or even do any real damage I don't think.

[@lennyaviation9653]

I own a large portion of the Wittmann estate and visited his widow frequently. The letters he received from comrades who had served with him through the years are full of admiration for their former commander and many expressed their longing to serve under him again at one point. The few days of vacation Wittmann had, he took the time to always answer all the corresponce he had received during his time at the front. Asking his widow what "Michel", as he was called by his men, would have done if he had survived the war, she answer that he would have wanted nothing more, but to become a farmer...

[@chrishewitt4220]

Cracking episode... edge of the seat suspense... more, more , more!

[@arsnova1321]

A bit of feedback: You guys make great, respectable, historical videos. Please don't resort to clickbait thumbnails with those silly arrows!

[@paulhills1967]

What an incredibly well made video. Thank you!

[@Rky-pr7zh]

I always look forward to your videos. Thank you. 🍺🍺

[@Bodkin_Ye_Pointy]

The interesting thing here is that Wittmann's command originally consisted of 5 tigers. Three were sent to attack a Polish unit on another hill, but I have yet to find out what the outcome there was. In the mean time Wittmann was originally accompanied by another Tiger on the assault on Villers-Bocage. It broke down in an open field and the crew abandoned it, sore thumb and all. So both Wittmann's Tigers were lost in the assault. I also think it rather churlish that the infantry were criticised for their behaviour in the action. Being caught off guard with no armour and limited impact on the Tiger, (Only PIAT's to use) they were rather on a hiding to nothing. Further, one should note that the crew of the 6pdr were rather gallant in bringing their gun into action despite the attention it received earlier in the battle. Kudos to the resilience of the gunners and the actual gun for their action I think. Finally, Joe Ekins exacted revenge for the 8th Army on his gun in a Firefly from an apple orchard where he ambushed Wittmann's new troop as it once again took a bold advance on the British line. This time Joe and then some Canadians killed all 5 of Wittmann's tanks including Wittmann himself. This time the luck was with the British with that Firefly being positioned on the flank of Wittmann's advance.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

And then the following day on August 9th at Estrees la Campagne, a small number of Tigers from the rest of Wittmann's battalion were largely responsible for the destruction of Worthington Force. The Canadian 28th Armoured Regiment lost 47 tanks, including 44 Shermans, mostly to long range sniping from the Tigers firing from 1,000 metres and more. Even having Fireflies didnt help the Canadians. No Tigers were lost in the engagement.

[@ChristopheA-dd5we]

According to modern sources it more probably some rocket from a Typhoon who has destroy Wittman's tiger.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@ChristopheA-dd5we No that's been 100% refuted. It was the Canadians close to Wittmann's left flank who got him, firing from behind the chateau wall.

[@ChristopheA-dd5we]

@@lyndoncmp5751 so as I said at the end we are not sure. that the reality period.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@ChristopheA-dd5we Yes we are sure. No Typhoon got him. Canadian Shermans firing from as close as 150 metres on his left flank got him.

[@gsp0113]

Superb video. I enjoyed your retelling of these historic events immensely. Thanks.

[@Blackcloud_Garage]

I really like these videos discussing battles. More please 🙏

[@daviddavid5880]

Holy crabcakes. All in 15 min. Astounding

[@VosperCDN]

Not quite as long as the video is .. wonder if that was planned or not.

[@Alexeiiii]

Good video that shows what superior guns and armour could mean in the hands of skilled crews, same happened at the Eastern front. But quantity and especially air support luckily made the difference at the end.

[@marcuscallaghan2238]

great to hear a very good timeline of the actual events with graphics to match. excellent work here,.....more like this please.

[@Sturminfantrist]

going alone in with only one tank into this Clusterf... full of Tanks, Inf. ect sounds like a suiciderun, he was really lucky that day. i remember i played that Mission in Comp. of Heros 3rd part, was pure fun.

[@yoschiannik8438]

A wise man once saied: Wittman wasnt the best tank ace of ww2, he was the luckiest."

[@lyndoncmp5751]

Not really because when he began his attack the British tanks were all in his line of vision on the road and weren't all over the place on his flanks. He also, understandably, had great confidence in the Tiger's ability to take enemy shots. Which his Tiger did for the most part.

[@yoschiannik8438]

@@lyndoncmp5751 He literaly drove intl a town full of angles and allys. Heck, he literaly drive past 2 tanks without noticing. And his Tiger was lost during its very first engagment in the west. Heck evrey single Tiger in the platoon he was leading was turned into scrap that day.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@yoschiannik8438 None of his 2nd Kompanie Tigers were lost that day. Even his own was later recovered.

[@amaterasu7532]

@@yoschiannik8438because your thoughts are based on what you've heard. You dont know whether the germans had recon missions there, what information did Wittmann posess.

[@stephenhunt2806]

Thanks John for an excellent and balanced video. Great graphics too.

[@volkerwestphal3746]

Especially the part with things being balanced is rarely really seen. So this is timeless.

[@Subcomandante73]

Excellent video. The graphics really bring clarity to what happened.

[@THESocialJusticeWarrior]

He was decisive and quick-thinking, like Rommel. Everyone that made it through a battle in WWII was lucky.

[@TimoZ992]

great video, thanks a lot.

[@SportbikerNZ]

Gosh, that pee break weighed heavily in history 😓

[@michaelkenny8540]

Its a euphemism.

[@SportbikerNZ]

@@michaelkenny8540 The account didn't indicate it was an euphemism.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

Might not have made a difference. The Tiger's rear was still 80mm thick and slightly angled at 8 degrees, which made the rear slightly thicker than the sides.

[@residentgeardo]

Another excellent video! Thank you!

[@cgross82]

Good research and scholarship! It is good to know that most of the crews and the infantry survived the attack.

[@roygardiner2229]

As an Englishman born a few days after these events I am angry watching it. It was clearly a mega-shambles. Poor planning, poor training, poor equipment. At one critical point I commented to myself that "I bet they got out for a cup of tea". And they did. However, I do recognise it is easy for me to criticise: what do I know? I am not trained in these matters. I was prompted to do some online research. From Wikipedia I got a fuller picture which, although it did not diminish Wittmann's achievement, showed a more balanced perspective.

[@GerardMenvussa]

Too much tea and too many pee breaks 🤷‍♂️

[@novis_cz1gaming200]

So lazerpig started the discussion yet again

[@aragorn_]

Indeed

[@isaacnickel]

LP is an idiot

[@Icetea-2000]

What?

[@Ganiscol]

Way overrated

[@CAP198462]

Cheers Rex Ingram! 🥂

[@zoltanszilvassy8715]

Well-paced and Narrated with excellent photos to accompany the episode. Excellent work and valuable 'lessons learned' examples here for Jr. Commanders and NCOs and troopers serving today, who need to take note. 41C

[@michaelkenny8540]

There is a major area of contention in accounts of the battle. Pat Dyas says he met WIttmann (2 kp SS 101) 'head-on' after the latter drove into Villers, was engaged by the Firefly then retreated out of Villers to come face-to-face with Dyas. Wittmann's own radio broadcast of the same day clearly states he was knocked out 'in the centre of Villers' and we even have film and photos of a single 2 kp Tiger knocked out 'in the centre of Villers'. If you believe the Dyas version then Wittmann is wrong. A lot of people (want to) believe Dyas so they speculate that Wittman was in ANOTHER undocumented and unphotographed Tiger (which they say is 231) and it was this Tiger that retreated out of Villers, met Dyas, knocked him out and then drove on to be in turn knocked out by the 6 pdr gun. All of the claims Wittmann was in 231 are based on the sole account by Dyas as in 'it is a version that would fit in with what Dyas claims.' This then raises the issue of where did the sole 2 kp Tiger seen knocked out in Villers (exactly where Wittmann says he was knocked out)come from and for this the Dyas supporters have no answer so they ignore it. A far more credible answer is that Dyas did not 'wait to get a replacement driver' but instead drove right after Wittmann as he went INTO Villers. Wittmann simply rotated his turret and knocked-out Dyas and continued into the town and was hit by The Firefly. Wittmann then turned and ran but was hit again (most likely by the Firefly) and disabled. Wittmann then abandoned his Tiger in the centre of Villers Bocage. If we discard the Dyas 'head-on' claim then everything hangs together pretty well.

[@efreitorsroul9332]

you have to give to the allied tanks design that they , apparently , had a high rate of crew survivebility

[@JohnDiabol]

Also because in a lot of cases, at such close ranges and against thinly armored light tanks, the 88mm AP shell would not meet significant enough resistance to detonate, but would instead pass straight through the vehicle and out on the other side. The spray of shrapnel would still be dangerous, but significantly less so than having the explosive charge detonate inside the tank.

[@lllordllloyd]

Most of the crews hopping out when deep behind enemy lines certainly helped the men survive.

[@NaturalLanguageLearning]

00:08 Owittmann Kenobi had the high ground and the Brits could do nothing about it.

[@nightshiftrider819]

Wittmann: You underestimate my 88mm! Ekins: Don't try it! Wittmann: Arghhhh Ekins: *MULTIKILL!!! *

[@johnhennis6095]

Thanks for this well balanced account. The best book I've seen on this topic is called "Villers-Bocage Through The Lens", which does a very good job of analysing the contemporary photos and also provides an overview of the subsequent actions over the next few days. It was the first account I found that dispelled the "Wittmann as Superman" myth, whilst capturing the confusion of the action.

[@michaelkenny8540]

The book you mention is 20 years old and contains errors. Taylor has just released another book in 2023 (Villers Bocage. Operation Perch: The Complete Account.) which is far more detailed with much more comprehensive coverage

[@johnbyrne4466]

The best end to end video by a country mile I've ever watched, all the honest nitty-gritty of bike touring..a fantastic inspirational journey for all cyclists..well done and thank you for posting.

[@Mr_Bunk]

Wrong video

[@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188]

I have the Film in which Ekins tells his story in the destruction of Wittmanns Tiger during his last fight. And though being a brilliant Tank gunner, Ekins strangely became taken away for other jobs! Sadly I didn't manage to visit Wittmann's grave in the German, La Campe Cemetery, during my one visit to Normandy, many years ago.

[@callumgordon1668]

I’ve seen it. His crew and he are in a single grave, which tells its own story, notwithstanding their remains were relocated long after.

[@agripinaa8684]

Never miss the chance for a free bathroom

[@williamcarter1993]

@@agripinaa8684 always be going

[@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188]

@@callumgordon1668 The Germans haven't got an Official War Grave Commission, so the graves are maintained from Funds donated from private persons. Close to my former home in Denmark, the names on the German Graves became repainted by young persons coming up in summer. And one group of Germans are outside the stone-fence of the Churchyard, because the local Priest (!) wouldn't allow the graves (Mostly fugitives from the East!) inside "His Churchyard"!

[@callumgordon1668]

@@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 my understanding is that Volksbund Deutsche Kriegsgräberfürsorge look after German War Graves from the World Wars outwith Germany? You are of course right that they’re mostly charitably funded. I’ve only visited large German cemeteries in Europe. In the U.K., it’s quite common to have small numbers of military graves in our cemeteries, usually associated with adjacent hospitals, or naval bases and airfields. I can’t find the reference and given some of those who’re interested in this, you have to be careful of your sources, but my understanding is that Wittmann and his crew’s remains were relocated some years after his death and reinterred at La Cambe, which is the main German cemetery for the Normandy Campaign. His Tiger apparently exploded after being KOd, hence the famous picture of the turret upside down. Best not to dwell on the impact of those, probably already dead, in the tank. If anyone has a credible reference regarding the above, I’d welcome.

[@T-Gunns]

Of course he’ll try to say Wittmann’s achievements are exaggerated a bit, he’s British. It’s obvious they got caught with their pants down though. Literally. One crew gunner taking a wiz still hasent come back. And before that a tea party that cost a row of half tracks and other vehicles . Tanks come on. He knew what he was doing. And whether by accident or not. He took all those vehicles and tanks out. Opposing sides always have different stories. Oh I didn’t see this huge pile of logs behind me. Come on. Don’t put yourself in a vulnerable position to begin with. The Victors write the history books.

[@andrewflindall9048]

There are photos of a ransacked Pz IV at the top of the town that appears to have bellied itself on the log in question. I think we can infer that it was a genuine hazard, and one that the amateurish, incompetent Brits managed to avoid unlike the elite, professional Germans.

[@robertrawlyss7373]

From what I can remember, he made his own look with his daring and guts!

[@filmtajm35]

Very interesting. Thank you for sharing.

[@zaynevanday142]

All War has an element of Luck involved 😂😂😂

[@pavarottiaardvark3431]

Essentially, he lost the duel with the Infantry carriers. He destroyed the carriers, but didn't get the troops. Those troops then immobilised his Tiger.

[@suityboi2126]

"a glorious heroic victory" >he lost the 1st tiger tank in the Normandy campaign where they had only ~31 to deploy. >he alerted the British to the fact that there was a panzer unit in the area. >he then didn't tell his unit what happened or that the British were now alerted. >he spoiled his division's attack which very well could have divided the British armored corps lines early on in the Normandy campaign and could have given Germany more time. >he took credit for any British vehicle knocked out that day, despite other tanks doing more. "a glorious heroic victory" what a joke

[@Karras353]

I think it is somewhat doubtful that a person describing the actions of a member of the SS as "glorious" and "heroic" is here for a rational discussion. But consider this, the loss of 100% of committed resources, proceeding without securing a line of retreat and making little difference to the strategic situation can at best be rated as a mixed result.

@@Karras353And I think it’s somewhat doubtful that a person who discredits the achievement of an outstanding soldier just because he fought in a WSS unit is here for a rational discussion… I think it is out of doubt that Wittmann as a tank soldier never was even remotely accused of any wrong doings during the war and his achievements before Villers-Bocage were already remarkable. So this was not a one time lucky incident but just another act of bravery and skill and I believe it’s nothing else but fair to give credit where credit is due.

[@frankvandergoes298]

​@@suityboi2126They defeated Operation Perch, which was a major attempt to outflank Panzer Lehr division and capture Caen. All for the loss of 4 Tigers and a few Panzer IV,s. If an American had done it Brad Pitt would have made a movie.

[@suityboi2126]

-wittman was not apolitical -wittman was a volunteer for the ss -wittman several times was in the company of Adolf Hitler -wittman willingly fought for and furthered the ideals and goals of the nazi party -wittman targeted medic vehicles during his ambush Wittmans ambush was not glorious or heroic. He attacked a British unit by himself without telling anyone or having any escape route, spoiled his divisions larger attack, targeted medics and was killed the next time he tried the same.

[@EddietheBastard]

Great video. Failures of communication are so often found in relation to notable disasters. So are failures of reconnaissance and lay up management. The detailed summary of actions that day at the end shows just how deadly efforts to attack in the Boccage were. In term of resources the Tigers lost were far less replaceable than the British Cromwell and Sherman tanks.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

The small number of Tigers were camouflaged and hidden in a sunken lane well away from the road. The lane was bordered by trees and was itself out of the line of sight due to a slight rise in the ground. Short of checking every copse, hedge, lane and bush for hundreds of yards on either flank of the advance, which carried on for miles there was no way to recon everything.

[@EddietheBastard]

​@@lyndoncmp5751 post pickets, have the gunners and drivers in each troop rest in turns, deploy ATGs rather than park up with them limbered. Maybe listen to the video and learn the circumstances.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@EddietheBastard I actually own the updated Daniel Taylor book on it. There is nothing the video can tell me that I don't already know. Pickets wouldn't have detected Wittmann and his Tigers any sooner. As soon as Wittmann moved he was spotted quite quickly anyway. Wittmann broke cover not long after the column arrived there. It's not as if the column was there all day doing nothing. The lead elements barely bypassed Wittmanns position before he quickly acted. Pickets wouldn't have found Wittmann before he moved. I'll repeat, Wittmann and his Tigers were well off the road to the south in a sunken lake and heavily camouflaged. Out of the line of sight of the British column. Presumably you think every hedge, every lane, every bush within hundreds of yards of either side of the road over miles and miles of territory from the moment the 7th Armoured Division set off miles before should have been cleared. Well that's preposterous. It was not a panzer division lying in wait unnoticed. Just a handful of Tigers.

[@EddietheBastard]

@@lyndoncmp5751 pickets wouldn't have seen him coming? Having the guns deployed wouldn't have enabled them to be fired? Having gunners and drivers take their breaks in turn wouldn't have left them better set to respond? Reading doesn't actually have a lot of effect if you don't also think or understand.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@EddietheBastard "pickets wouldn't have seen him coming?" You clearly didn't read what I wrote. Wittmann was spotted soon after he left cover regardless. He started firing almost immediately and thus his presence was known more or less right away. Pickets wouldn't have made any difference except added more casualties to Wittmann's tally if they were in that meadow closer to him. Wakey wakey. I clearly understand the situation more than you do so quit being such a pillock and go back to sleep. Your ignorance bores me now.

[@KenjiMapes]

There is no luck. Wittman has a sharp eye for tactics, a courageous spirit & a preternatural battlefield awareness IQ. It also helped that he had a cohesive & talented crew highlighted by his exceptional gunner Bobby Woll. The Germans had the best tank optics & sights made by Zeiss which gave them a decided edge, but the tankers of WW2 didn’t enjoy the digital tech that modern tankers now have. There were no laser range finders, thermal sights, a crosswind sensor or ballistic computer to aid them in target acquisition, targeting & shooting. They relied mainly on skill & experience. They had to estimate range & learn to calculate the best firing solutions manually. It’s a shame that Michael Wittman & renegade panzer ace Kurt Knispel both died in WW2, the latter of which died like 2 weeks before war’s end. We luckily got great memoirs from Colonel Hans Von Luck & panzer ace Otto Carius. I read both of them & they’re great reads. It would have been fascinating to see what Wittman & Knispel left for posterity. I don’t know if this is true or some fanciful lore but apparently the commander for Desert Storm Norman Scwarzkopf had Rommel’s book with him during his planning of the war. It’s a different time with more advanced weaponry now, but one can still get nuggets of wisdom from the generals of the past.

[@andrewflindall9048]

You could probably take the sight out and shoot better at VB's engagement ranges. In fact, one of the Fireflies that despatch a couple of Wittmann's mates that afternoon actually boresighted their 17-pr through the breech across the road they were covering. Several panzers obligingly drove past it and didn't drive any more...

[@michaelkenny8540]

Zeiss sights are of no benefit when firing at point-blank ranges, Woll was not Wittmann's gunner at VB, Wittmann was knocked out and had to run for his life, Otto Carius claimed c 50+ tank kills for his unit on the day his Commander listed them getting 17 kills. It seems facts are not your strong-point.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

I doubt Wittmann decided to withdraw specifically because Sgt Lockwood's tank was a Firefly but rather due to the smoke and dust obscuring his vision so it was pointless continuing. Did he even know what a Firefly was, even if he was able to see Lockwood's tank clearly? The Germans had only begun encountering Fireflies for the first time the previous week, and Wittmann had been on the road march with his battalion through that period so what would his awareness of Fireflies have been? How much info was there about a new allied tank with the 17 pounder gun, before Wittmann arrived in Normandy the day before?

[@TTTT-oc4eb]

From what I've seen the Germans didn't really know much about the Firefly before Normandy.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@TTTT-oc4eb Yes definitely the Germans knew nothing about the Firefly before Normandy, as it wasn't deployed in combat until June 6th 1944. I just wondered what the grapevine word was in the week after D-day, up to Villers Bocage on the 13th. Perhaps there was none. I suspect Wittmann had heard little or nothing about Fireflies, as Wittmann was in transit from northeast France to the Normandy front from the 7th to the 12th. Wittmann likely wouldn't have even known about Cromwells either, as they weren't deployed in combat until D-Day like the Firefly.

[@faeembrugh]

Divided forces in the face of the enemy - a classic recipe for disaster.

[@amaterasu7532]

Luck favors the strong. What a warrior! It was indeed a showcase of his talent and experience, 'cause it wasnt the first time for sure.

[@blakebaker830]

Even though none of the vehicles that were destroyed posed a huge threat to the Tiger, their destruction was still a major blow tactically and for morale. Those Cromwells, Stuarts and carriers were meant to carry the infantry across the tough terrain of the hedgerows. Wittmann's rampage succeeded in eliminating hostile transport and recon vehicles that would have been invaluable to the allied troops trying to press ahead. While he did indeed get lucky that he caught the vehicles and their crews at rest, the raw efficiency of he and his crew to cause as much chaos as they did in such a short span does speak to their training and tenacity in combat.

[@michaelkenny8540]

There was no shortage of replacement vehicles. Manpower was the problem. Whilst the Wittmann fanboys concentrate on the tank losses the complete destruction of The Rifle Brigade Motor Battalion was a much more significant loss than 75% of a Tank Squadron.

[@andrewflindall9048]

To be fair, it wasn't even the complete destruction of the Motor Company. A Coy, and the A/Tk Pl fom B Coy, only have 9 fatal casualties on CWGC. Three of those are officers. I don't have the figures but whilst some went into the bag (especially the wounded), quite a few from the road worked their way back to the battalion.

[@flammenjc]

@@michaelkenny8540 Makes no sense. No point knocking any tank or man out then if there's "loads of replacements". Damage is damage and it has to be recovered either physically or with blood. It all counts and such a comment is a slight on all those British soldiers who died that day.

[@randyhavard6084]

Fortune favors the bold

[@1IbramGaunt]

If that's true where's Whitmann

[@randyhavard6084]

@@1IbramGaunt there were an awful lot of bold men fighting that war

[@1IbramGaunt]

@@randyhavard6084 I meant that Wittmann was certainly "bold" alright (if by "bold" you mean a vain, arrogant egomaniac glory-hound who wanted to be first into the fray not so much out of bravery but because he wanted all the attention and fame for himself) and that's what got him killed, he tried this exact same racing on ahead alone thing again, not long after in another Tiger 1 against similar opponents, and let's just say good luck doesn't last forever

[@randyhavard6084]

@@1IbramGaunt I know the story very well, I didn't say it was a good idea or the right thing for him to have done but the only reason you and I or anybody else know about Whitman is because of his aggressiveness, just like Irwin Rommel. Not always a good idea but it just might make you famous.

[@1IbramGaunt]

@@randyhavard6084 no argument to be made there I guess

[@davegreenwood7575]

Luck is always on the cards...but he knew his job and more to the point so did his gunner. Not so lucky very shortly later...

[@DonaldDuck666]

Tanks for the video.

[@crazymoo56]

Loved playing the "Company of Heroes" mission about this battle!

[@cgo225]

Wittman's "luck" reminds me of a golfing legend who said "The more I practice, the luckier I get". It's all very well talking about "luck", but - in any walk of life we care to consider - the most courageous and most technically talented are always the most "lucky". Luck must be earned by hard work, commitment and sacrifice.. and even if it lands in one's lap out of the blue, only those who've invested in their technical skills and emotional development over many years will have the insight and experience to recognise it when it lands and make the most of it - Wittman was one such individual.

[@michaelkenny8540]

The 'luck' being described is the absolutely random way Wittmann ended up being positioned some distance behind a full squadron of tanks and facing a HQ group of Command/OP tanks and half-tracks. It was not the result of superior skill but just chance that he was pre-positioned 1.5 km behind A Squadron 4th CLY and 1.5 km in front of 'B' Squadron. He was dead centre of a 3km gap. Note that as soon as he bumped into the lead tanks of 'B' Squadron and started taking hits he immediately turned tail and tried to make it back to his own lines.

[@whya2ndaccount]

3:09 Usually an "O" group is an Orders Group, not an Operational Group.

[@pex_the_unalivedrunk6785]

this is the most detailed breakdown of the villa Bocage Michael Whitman battle I have ever seen! (it reminds me a bit of a video of Reliant vs Enterprise in Star Trek II I watched on another channel) and being in the right place at the right time, no kidding! still...losing a Tiger is never a good thing in Germany's position.

[@danmcdonald9117]

Great video! Informative and gripping

[@neilcastell6951]

Maybe Wittmann decided to stop, not because of the firefly but because ammo was low or expended, How many shells did he fire ?? ... 33? 35?

[@Paciat]

And how much ammo a Tiger had? 92?

[@Wien1938]

Wittmann was interviewed for a propaganda piece a month later and he said that he pulled back when encountering the Firefly. The purpose of the attack was to aggressively disrupt the enemy force coming up the road. The Germans taught and practiced individual aggression and simply "pushing your luck".

[@eric-wb7gj]

@@Wien1938 Agreed, but most people can only push their luck so far, as Wittmann found out on 8th Aug '44. He may have had more 'luck' though if his division had done any reconnaissance, & even survived that encounter.

[@dpeasehead]

@@eric-wb7gj I think Wittmann and other Eastern front veterans acquired habits which served them well in that theater against the Russians, but were suicidal when they encountered the Allies in Normandy with their superior scouting assets, massive amounts of effective anti-tank weapons, and much better access to things like tactical radios.

[@eric-wb7gj]

@@dpeasehead Quite possibly, they had never faced a modern western army before. German tactics of quick counter attacks didn't always work, they'd found that out in 1916/1917. Everyone was making mistakes. On the Allied side, the Desert Rats were a veteran formation, but all in the Desert, they had to 'unlearn' a lot in Normandy. Sadly, for the other British troops, they didn't have (& still don't) have enough areas to train properly. Coming up against Eastern Front veterans was also a steep learning curve.

[@Tvvugt]

Some say the Cromwell's crewmember is still taking a leak.

[@brettlynam5048]

He’s likely the only one that didn’t wet himself when they turned out on the road and found a tiger staring at them. Lol

[@trevorfitzgerald4996]

Think he would have crapped himself. Tell me why would you let the guy out in the middle of a battle? Did he jump out and try and run away.

[@pikiwiki]

Thanks!

[@gurthnar]

Excellent presentation! Informative and captivating. Good job!

[@nicolapellegrino1072]

Obviously he get lucky... but in war luck is part of strategy, looking at what's happened British simply got ambushed and surprised, Wittman put himself in a good situation and took advantage from that, the superiority of armor and gun made the rest... but there's still people who make comparisons between Sherman and tigers tank because of this episode... obviously they have no idea on what are they taking about.

[@kgrant536]

Still butthurt after all these years. Priceless.

[@SteamCrane]

Excellent presentation.

[@Bnshee06]

Wittmann drove a completely gold plated Tiger Tank

[@Norfolkyakker]

"Got lucky" my a***. He had a better machine, was highly skilled and confident. Compare that with his foe. (I won't get a heart)

[@muskett4108]

Different timings and Wittmann might have moved out of cover and been taken out by a 6 pounder or a Firefly. Heck, had a Piat take him out in the streets. Wittmann did push his luck and did eventually lose his Tiger. Every side had bad days, the Allies fewer and fewer. The Allies had their turkey shoots too. The allies got good at destroying Tigers, not that there were ever many. War is grim.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

The allies were still suffering heavy disproportionate losses against the Tigers even at the end of Normandy, such as destruction of Worthington Force at Estrees la Campagne on 9th August. Most of the 47 Canadians tanks lost there were to the Tigers of Wittmann's battalion, the day after he was killed himself.

[@muskett4108]

@@lyndoncmp5751 Bad days, thats for sure. Just look at operation Goodwood, where lessons learnt there took 300 Allied tanks (some mendable, just under half) to 75 German, for not a lot of ground. The operational objectives weren't met, but the effect on the German moral was immense. Allied tactics and planning improved fast. But then there were good days such as Snipe Action where a few British guns filled their boots to the annoyance of Rommel. Don't get me wrong a Tiger is a fearsome weapon. Its just not insurmountable; tactics were found for them. And then there was never enough, never enough working, so, other than being "dangerous", no game changer.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@muskett4108 No the Tiger was not insurmountable. No tank of WW2 was. The Tiger still caused many problems right at the end of the war however. One single Tiger held up the advance of the British 3rd Royal Tank Regiment on Sassenach Germany in April 1945. Just one Tiger on its own. In Operation Totalize the Tiger had a 10:1 knock out ratio over the Sherman. 6 Tigers lost to Shermans vs over 60 Canadian and Polish Shermans lost to Tigers.

[@muskett4108]

@@lyndoncmp5751 I don't doubt you, but then who would want to get killed in the last month or so of the war? Falaise pocket became a killing ground for several days, and might have been even more so. The Battle of the Bulge, was an absolute German failure, where Tigers proved they weren't a match to Allied all arms action. Their offensive reason for being built was a failure, so they ended up as defensive mobile pillboxes. Doesn't mean they weren't dangerous. Any "88" gun was, due to range and accuracy. I do agree that Sherman losses were horrendous. Some tank units lost all their tanks at least twice in the European campaign. Half of which got patched up and put back into service. When only 6500 Tigers were built they were a bit of a bogeyman. 50 odd thousand Shermans, and 60 odd thousand T34s built. Very few Tiger tanks actually survived to get to a museum, because most were completely destroyed.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@muskett4108 The Falaise Pocket was a nightmare yes, due largely to allied air power. However, the allies had a very hard time moving on Falaise in the first place because of the defensive performance of German armour, particular Tigers and Panthers. Operation Totalize failed. The Canadians and Poles had over 600 tanks vs around 50 German, and they couldn't meet their objectives for the operation (to reach Falaise) due to German actions such as Estrees la Campagne. The Canadians and Poles lost nearly 200 tanks during Operation Totalize. Totalize showed that despite vast numerical superiority and advantages in most other categories, including air power the much smaller number of especially Tigers and Panthers were able to inflict a very heavy toll on the advancing allies. August actually saw the largest number of British 21st Army Group tank losses in the Normandy campaign. Far more than June and July. The Ardennes was poor tank country for all tank types on both sides. Mud, snow, hilly wooded terrain, small bridges. Shermans actually performed worse there. The Americans lost nearly 3 tanks in combat in the Ardennes for every one German lost. After the Ardennes the US 6th Armored Division declared the Sherman ineffective. While the Tiger didnt perform well when used offensively in the Ardennes, it did elsewhere such as the retaking of Kharkov, Zhitomir-Berdichev, the Cherkassy-Korsun relief etc. Even the King Tigers that were pulled out of the Ardennes (only 13 out of 45 King Tigers in Schwere SS Panzer Abteilung 501 were lost in the Ardennes) and sent to Hungary were very effective when the German counter attack retook the Gran Bridgehead against the Red Army in February 1945. The King Tigers of Schwere SS Panzer Abteilung 501 lead the counter attack. Few Tigers were left to end up in museums because the Germans tended to self destroy those undefeated in combat rather than let the enemy capture them. The Germans had a thing about not letting the enemy capture their Tigers intact. Understandable.

[@bakersmileyface]

That CoH mission introduced me to this story.

[@stco2426]

Very interesting and great comments. Also a good and captivating presentation. Many thanks.

[@davidtruesdale456]

Excellent account, although I would appreciate some further details of the four Tigers that remained at the very beginning of the action?

[@lyndoncmp5751]

They were pinning down the leading British elements on Point 213.

[@davidtruesdale456]

@@lyndoncmp5751 Many thanks.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@davidtruesdale456 No worries. There is also an argument that one of the other Tigers also moved towards the town itself but I don't think there is definite proof of this.

[@davidtruesdale456]

@@lyndoncmp5751 You may well se this in print, someday. Thanks again.

[@lyndoncmp5751]

@@davidtruesdale456 Daniel Taylor's updated book on Villers Bocage is the best we will get in print. Unfortunately, it doesn't go into great detail regarding the other Tigers except to say they were engaging the leading British elements on Point 213, with another one engaging further towards town. The British thought there might have been a Tiger to the north of the road as well but that was likely just confusion, as none of the Tigers would have bivouacked north of the road individually. They were all bivouacked a couple of hundred metres south of the road in a sunken lane, out of sight of the road when the British advanced and in the process of having some maintenance work done on them. I can't see how one would have ended up north of the road.

[@GerardMenvussa]

One thing I don't understand. What were the other Tigers doing this whole time? Why not use them?

[@shadelampsofficial]

only 1 other was operational. the rest were broken down and repairing

[@GerardMenvussa]

@@shadelampsofficial Oh ok, makes sense. They were Tigers after all :o)

[@SoltyII]

@@shadelampsofficial If that's so, why can we see another Tiger right next to Wittman's at 14:06. One with turret front and another to the side.

[@shadelampsofficial]

@@SoltyII im not even sure if those pictures were from the battle or just after it

[@1IbramGaunt]

@@shadelampsofficial just after it, and the "after it" is the part of the battle the Wehraboo Wittmann-fanboys really don't want you to know about haha; because the fact is that, when you look at the bigger picture they actually LOST this damn battle, losing several virtually-irreplaceable Tiger tanks (out of the only 30-something they had on the whole Western front) in the process, in exchange for British and American vehicles we had thousands upon thousands more of

[@andrewcarpenter2459]

Lt. Rex Ingram was my second Cousin and this account of his death is what our Family has always believed happened, yet this account is the first time that we've ever heard his name in this action. My Brother knows many more details than I do and may comment in due course. He is the current custodian of Rexs' medals as well as those of his Father, Captain BWI Ingram ( Uncle B) who had a distinguished service in WWI. Rex is honoured by my Family, having given his young life to defend his Comrades

[@andrewflindall9048]

The link having been deleted, google 'ww2talk bocage ingram labeline' for some additional detail in case you haven't seen it already

[@jamesdunn9609]

This is perhaps the most balanced treatment of this action I have seen. Good work! There is no question that Wittmann got lucky. It is hard to imagine ever getting a better opportunity than the one he found that day at Villers-Bocage. And he used his Tiger to full advantage. The problem is that Nazi propagandists completely misrepresented his actions. Now historians want to "correct the record" but some are making the same mistake only in reverse. I have seen many presentations of this incident, and there seems to be a move toward minimizing Wittmann's actions. This is a mistake. Wittmann was a very experienced tank commander and took full advantage of the situation. Yet he knew his side was in trouble and he couldn't just throw his Tiger away. It was too valuable and they were running out of them, so when confronted by the Firefly, he chose to disengage. But he still couldn't get away. A week later Wittmann led the last five Tigers under his command directly in to an ambush where they all died. I think he had a fairly nihilistic attitude by that point. He had been on the Eastern Front and knew they were not going to stop the Soviets, and had just seen the Allies land at Normandy and then slowly begin crushing their forces. Wittmann was certainly not a hero, but he wasn't a fool either. He was a very competent tank commander who found himself in a unique situation, and took full advantage of it. A week later he was dead.

[@castrogonzalez614]

Good comment, enjoyed reading it.

[@kodor1146]

Never heard of this guy before. What a remarkable soldier.

[@phunkeehone]

The Germans were in general very skilled soldiers, be it footsoldiers in Wehrmacht or Ss, Luftwaffe or their tank commanders. I'd argue that the allies mainly won by numbers (not that they exactly did bad). When it comes to overall performance on the battlefield, I'd say that the Germans took the prize. German effeciency, I guess.

[@Matt-go7ss]

Definitely a brown trouser moment when that Tiger appeared

[@1IbramGaunt]

Not for Rex Ingram it wasn't

[@StuSaville]

Also a brown trouser for Wittmann as he legged it after encountering a Firefly.

[@fallschirmjager0000]

@@StuSaville You mean when the firefly commander crapped himself when the house fell on him and failed to knock out the tiger when its turret was turned to the side. Aye. The british were a shambles that day. Move on.

[@kingmobmor7656]

Who was it who said "I would rather be lucky than good."? Being both is obviously what you want, and just as the cliche says, you make your own luck.

[@noelmaher4633]

Regardless, wasn't luck was tradecraft.. He wasn't aware what was facing him in heat of battle..Brave men all round... The luck was in living...

[@NapoleanBlown-aparte]

Wittman moment

[@bwilliams463]

If the Allies were aware that an armored car was shadowing them, why didn't they attempt to destroy it?

[@nightjarflying]

Perhaps they did attempt to. Difficult to catch an armoured car if the crew know the area - it's hedges, stone walls & narrow lanes everywhere you look.

[@Eli-pf5og]

Knowing it’s there and being able to kill it are 2 different things

[@drumsanddrumming8289]

What an amazing story. Well told!

[@chrismair8161]

The "Black Baron" saw the group travelling and fresh off the "Train" without the rest of his platoon of 4 other Tiger 1's was fully armed and Balls Out went after them! Blind sided as the British Company were, Michaels gunner and loader were like a symphony of 88mm Gun Fire! He did not stop to fire! He trained his crew to fire on the move! This is a huge beast trolling through winding streets in a town! Aces to the driver of the Barons Tank!

[@michaelkenny8540]

What a load o tosh. The 'Black Baron' name was made up in the 1970s by Tamiya Tiger groupies. You appear to share the same knowledge of history they had.

[@BadMuflon]

Wittmanns solo yolo's are legendary... From his Stug eastern front days up to his demise

[@1IbramGaunt]

Yeah although how much of those successes were actually HIS we'll never really know now given the combination of propaganda, lost real combat records and the German habit of assigning the whole unit's kills

[@sushi_cat_og5411]

@@1IbramGaunt I think OP was talking about how Wittmann would just charge into battle (even by himself like he was the main character), rather than his achievements.

[@guaporeturns9472]

@@1IbramGauntSomeone is butthurt

[@OctaBech]

@@guaporeturns9472 you are projecting your own way of thinking

[@BadMuflon]

@@1IbramGaunt In my experience reasarching about ww2 aces, either tank aces or pilots its pretty obvious to me that the numbers are realistic... Those soldiers went to multiple fronts fighting for months, even years, they went up the ranks to comanders, usually heavy outnumbered in combat and some of them survived the war, some died in the last 2 months... What do u think if u went to the eastern front, fought for years and after transfered to France how many tank kills would you had to your name?

[@jonL88]

Also Balthazar Woll, MVP!

[@rogercude1459]

By then he was in charge of his own tank, pretty sure he was badly wounded later on in a panther by a fighter bomber but survived the war.

[@HRM.H]

Amazing story telling

[@1339LARS]

Thank you!!!!! //Lars