World of Warplanes 2.0 - How Bad Can It Be?

[@Legobiy24]

"No, don't laugh" Jingles, I was laughing before I clicked on the video 😂

[@flashtirade]

As a War Thunder player who won't be touching this game, I am glad that this exists. Competition is almost always good for the consumers, so here's hoping WG can give Gaijin a run for their money and vice versa, so that both games get better for their playerbases.

[@joshjwillway1545]

you know my man

[@nedyarbnexus9460]

yup i have to admit, as shitty as this looks competions between companies will ALWAYS benefit the customers/players.

[@Mono-tc3mq]

yep, 100% agreed

[@jevry4307]

im just praying its enough to stop gaijins monopoly and stops it's absolutely horrifiyngly bad brain tissue damaging cancer inducing grinding policy. and if possible have them finally tone down the "totally non existant" russian bias... just a tiny bit. (whats the point of over a thousand vehicles if you will never not even in your life time be able to unlock and play them? (unless you pay more then a freaking triple A title costs ofcourse))

[@hammerr]

jevry I haven’t spent shit and I got to top tier German and American within a year

[@sirschebling]

I've been playing War Thunder for about three years now, have invested a lot of time in it and I think I can say I'm an above average player. I most likely will continue playing WT exclusively but I have to say, I'm happy that WoP is improving. Because not only will people who like it even more arcady than WT AB have something to play but now there also will be some more pressure on Gaijin. Because now there is at least some sort of competition, they'll have to keep tweaking WT to keep it competitive which only means we players get a better game...

[@kamitsune7021]

Sir Schebling wait, wt player that ain't salty?? Is this a dream?? XD

[@sirschebling]

It is. Now go back to sleep, tomorrow is a big day...

[@Halinspark]

Not just that, but it's great for the flightsim community as a whole. Too many games are pure sim with no UI or even objectives, or pure arcade where you do whatever you want and fire infinite missiles at anything that moves. We need more games skirting the middle ground, and WT is more on the Sim side than a lot of people are comfortable with. WoWp looks to be the same distance on the arcade direction.

[@derhesligebonsaibaum]

I am a beginner in WT (Tier 4 tanks and planes) and I am happy too.

[@manofharlech5775]

I agree with you. I'd been playing WT for several years (I still remember the old 20-tier tech trees) and as a WoWp CB player I believe I can compare these two games quite unbiased. In WT I prefer Realistic Battles, yet I've spent long time in Arcade as well. I had to quit WoWp due to a patch that came along with a horrendous optimization which made me completely unable to play with more than 12-15 FPS. After a while I found WT and since then WoWp was dead for me. I've played WT since then but few months ago I had enough of the Gaijin's "FU all" policy. That's why I hope WoWp's resurrection will force Gaijin to get their sh@t together and recall their original goals. I'll give this game a try and who knows, maybe I'll like it as I liked it back in CB. However WT is still my #1, it's just on hold for now. But that doesn't neccessarly mean WoWp is (going to be) worse. It's just different and there's (probably and hopefully) no reason for not playing both of the games... :)

[@MilesStratton]

Glad to see World of Warplanes picking itself back up even as a war thunder player. Hopefully this will help motivate gaijiggles to stop being complacent about their aircraft module.

[@dixievfd55]

Now they just need a good, competitive tank game to make them get serious about the ground combat aspect, too. They've been way too complacent.

[@ousou78]

I hope Gaijin will have the same reaction for War Thunder naval forces developpment

[@mrredacted700]

Still hate how Jingles bashes Warthunder and praises wargaming products

[@aschreeder]

in how far did he bashed war thunder? for example in this Video he complimented war thunder for ist intuitive controls and i couldnt agree more

[@joshjwillway1545]

MIIIIILLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES

[@swisstraeng]

"Special thanks to The Mighty Jingles who has made a Heliborne review just before the release. The game has never seen such a huge amount of players online as yesterday. Honestly, this is the best possible present we could get for the release." -heliborne's steam update

[@savate2755]

WG headline: 'We're not as shit as we used to be'.

[@حيدررحيمقاسم-ك1ض]

Savate lol this made my day

[@j.bproductions5424]

Savate except in WoT. WoWs and WoWP 2.0 are good, and to a lesser extent, WoTB. WoT has outlived it's usefullness to people who just wanna play for fun.

[@jekubfimbulwing5370]

Unfortunately, it's not that hard!

[@shmekelfreckles8157]

J.B Productions you don't play MMOs for fun, silly.

[@petti78]

Here, eat a false copyright claim attack. Let's throw in some child pornography while we are at it.

[@europanzer3929]

Holy... it actually looks decent. The previous didn't manage to convince me, but I actually might give this one a try.

[@cyonemitsu]

looks like they've taken lessons from looking at some other games in the genre, glad to see they've learned :D

[@Teru91333319]

Dude SAME

[@carlchan698]

it is not the game mechanics only, but also the teaming system with shutty teammates

[@Olav_Hansen]

O no, we have the same profile pick

[@mausmice9746]

europanzer it looks shit compared to war thunder

[@michelvanbriemen3459]

Reinforcements? RESPAWNING IN A WG GAME?!?!?! Colour me impressed

[@brdfnick3886]

for first time, we get to respawn in a WG game.

[@helgraf6976]

Nick Lamgamer no

[@BlatentlyFakeName]

Yea I'd like to see it in warships on massive maps/battles. Instead of just having the knock-out style matchmaking games.

[@iseeyou3424]

Is this a dream???

[@lucapagliai7869]

That's the whole point of the games they make, realism.

[@MrZashiratori]

*You know it's a good video when it starts with "Howdy Folks".....*

[@Baby_Valentine]

I think you gave the best recommendation that you can give a game. "I had fun." No matter how good or realistic the game, if you don't have fun, it's not worth it.

[@joten70]

18:10 Hey Jingles, i'm pretty sure you were ALL ALONE in that game playing agains BOTS ONLY. I might be wrong, but "Hugo", "Edwald", "Washington", etcetera don't sound like real playernames to me

[@natethenotsogreat8349]

@Joseph Discavage same thing with WoWs. You only find 3 or 4 people in each match until you hit tier V. Then you get matches of entirely human teams

[@Sliphantom]

Yeah but do they have the damn F6F now?!

[@maysterre]

OH damn, Noodle! What are you doing here?

[@ns6q333]

They never have and never will

[@rayanwade8331]

A tip: watch series on flixzone. Been using it for watching loads of movies these days.

[@atticuslangston9756]

@Rayan Wade definitely, have been watching on flixzone for since november myself :)

[@michaelmeszaros6982]

I'm having FUN? Sounds like the old saying "Got no job, no girlfriend, no money, no apartment....BUT I'M IN A BAND"......luv ya, Jingles."

[@angrypeanuts6399]

When I clicked this video I thought I was gonna be laughing at how bad it was, not downloading it half way through the video and then playing it for an hour and a half

[@TheAwesomeness744]

Same

[@Noswar]

is it worth the install?

[@maxxmatlock212]

It looks pretty good to be honest

[@DarkThunderism]

I befell the same fate when I first watched this video. Before I realized it, I was in a Tier V A6M Zero variant.

[@mausmice9746]

Maxx Matlock it looks shit

[@Android_ELITE]

Guys I love War Thunder too, probably more than most, but we shouldn't bash this game just because it exists or because it's in an arcade style. Actually as a direct result of that choice, War Thunder has nothing to worry about. This is a different game for different people. It looks very good for what it's trying to be and I'm glad Wargaming took the time to fix it even if I never play it. I hope they continue to support its development and that people enjoy it. To each their own.

[@JonThomas92]

This guy get's it!

[@Teru91333319]

Cheers lad!

[@TeaMMatE11]

Also... another good game is...well... another good game to play. I don't understand why people don't want this game to be successful, because if it is, it's just another game to install.

[@andreasgunawan691]

Android_ELITE I mean this game is not that bad I would give it a try, but I still prefer war thunder tho

[@christopherfoster6839]

Android_ELITE I'm honestly excited for the reboot. Hopefully this will prompt gaijin to change some features and make bombing points more dynamic.

[@MrBandholm]

I like that Warthunder might have to an actual competitor now (on war planes)... Yes they are still ahead by a country mile... But atleast Wargaming has actually taken off the airfield now.

[@-gevert-]

Well... it's not taking off that's the hardest part of it all, it's the landing. And if i can guess, WoWp will be doing a lot of Jingles landings ;)

[@Halinspark]

gewertpl I disagree. I've played many games in War Thunder where we lost half the players in the match just getting off the ground.

[@itsweegee8820]

pun intended or?

[@Dogtor_Orsum]

At first glance, I'd say you're right, WoWP has a decent shot here. I'm not a fan of health bars, or AB in general on WT (it does have shortcomings but I'm not an elitist calling it crap, I just don't like the mode much), but I am a fan of bombers, and the better variation of ground targets looks pretty good to me. WT's implementation of "strategic" bombing is awful (on a tactical-level map, drop X tons of bombs on static unchanging zones until it's dead; boring). Tactical bombing isn't great either; Most soft targets don't contribute to the win, Pillbox bombing can be dodgy, and Tank targets use the far harsher damage models from the Ground forces mode, which doesn't really fit the larger Air modes. This looks like they might actually be making more types of bombing worthwhile.

[@dallasuphold1745]

I though WOWP was going to die off like Generals did. I am glad to see they are improving the product now instead of just more premium planes.

[@Daizo]

The majority of people complaining here are completely missing the point with this game. "hurr durr WarThunder is so much better" and "look how unrealistic the planes act"; you forget this is a pure arcade game, Jingles even said it in the video. Sure, a lot of people are comparing the arcade mode in War Thunder to this game, and I can understand why you would think War Thunder is better. But they are two very different games with to very different outlooks on what their games should be. As a vet War Thunder player, I appreciate Jingles taking the time to do a video on this because now a lot of people who might be super interested in planes now have a game that can introduce them fairly easily into aircraft games and all that.

[@duchessskye4072]

There is simply no point with this game though. Anything this does, WT does and it does it better.

[@Daizo]

The_JoJo_Reference Im not saying the game is perfect and without flaw, because lord knows it's not perfect, im just tired of the arguments that are like "WT is way better cuz it's... better"

[@derpenberg1946]

Rōzu wt had planes , wg has ships and tanks I think they can handle not having the 10,000 player market for planes

[@peterjensen9468]

Rōzu and as you stated before, its for people who haven't played and flight games before.

[@spamcan5461]

Well yeah but you just said it. " People super interested in planes" if they were "super interested" in planes why would they play this. This game has changed I'll say ray now I remember playing it for myself and I hated it. Now it's different but it doesnt capture the essence of flying in the way WT does. Now it looks a bit more like a wargaming product. But if your SUPER into aviation I can't see this as the go to game. Maybe to de stress from WT but other than that I can't see myself deciding to play this over WT. I will give it another go though.

[@promontorium]

I just installed this and came here because I'm wondering why more people aren't playing it. I find it really fun. Much more so than tanks or ships. It's not easy but it feels more responsive. It feels like I want it to.

[@MarvinT0606]

It isn't as toxic as World of Tanks or as mathematical as World of Warships. It's just good fun with airplanes and that's why I love it.

[@august4480]

Yep, Im actually happy that War Thunder will finally have a decent competitor to aircraft warfare, I mean this game is still far away from WT but atleast they are improving and WoWP seemed more fun than it was last time

[@gu3z185]

That name "_"

[@AAArnold]

Oh you fool... If past you only knew how bad it would become...

[@MarvinT0606]

WoWP is a good place to start BEFORE you pick up WT. The scaling is smaller but the aircraft performance is similar (i.e. Fw-190s and T-bolts fly like bricks; Spitfires and A6Ms turn circles around you). Plus it helps you learn basic tactics instead of rushing in and getting shot down by a gaggle of fighters.

[@splasquttp4849]

battlefield 5

[@AlexVanChezlaw]

I came from the future, the game is still as dead as always.

[@Dracknov77]

Adding a beautiful improved graphic engine in World of Tanks Sand Box server and now this. Wargaming is working pretty damn hard and the results show. It's hard to make a good game, but to resurrect a dead game takes real focus and investment.

[@mrturtlebobington]

All the money from the Defender and the Chrysler K had to go somewhere

[@devistator_1219]

mrturtlebobington and thats good :D

[@JJ_ExMachina]

Well and them listening to their customers, helps a little bit too ;) They have actually managed to give light tanks purpose again. I am enjoying the new daily "missions" you can do in your tanks. Since I am a light/scout tank driver by choice, and Wargamming had pretty much ruined my reason to play (until recently), I took a nice long 4 month break from the game. SO glad I am able to play the game I have spent hundreds of dollars on over the last 5+ years... :)

[@sulligans]

ahahahah that was a good one mate!

[@Sigil_Firebrand]

WoWP seems like it's been modified to be WT's arcade mode, but made a bit more arcade in a good way. WT is an amazing game in realistic/simulator mode, but I personally feel like it utterly drops the ball for arcade, and honestly, I might give WoWP a fair try again, I was an alpha tester after all.

[@mychaeldark1007]

Having played WT for a while in all modes, both ground and air, the only difference is that you can or can't see the enemy in different modes. Other than that it's all just chasing a mouse cursor around the screen. On this I have to disagree with Jingles on; that's all WT has ever been in my experience. Chase the damn cursor.

[@pincopallino6765]

The only difference is markers? LOL. I don't belive that you've played realistic, not even to mention simulator.

[@a-drewg1716]

you got to be shitting me. In AB you can divebomb in a B-29 and i have seen people use a Wellington to dogfight. You can also change your controls so you don't just chase the cursor.

[@keko_7548]

War thunder in simulator, I dont think so,I beilive yes.in realistic battles its very good , but II ww aircraft simulator have more better than war thunder.

[@Handleofatleast3characters]

You can make a review interesting, even when I have less-than-zero interest in the reviewed game. Keep up the great work, Jingles!

[@RedBadger24]

Hey Jingles, I was thinking about sending you a message about a month or two ago to let you know that this update was on the horizon. I go to a University where I'm studying game design and Wargamming likes to send their products to our campus to have them tested. This update happened to be one of them and I remember being very excited when I left the test because I was so impressed with how much fun I had playing it. It is a far departure from the state of the game previously and by comparison far superior. I'm glad to see that you agree! Wish you the best and I hopefully look forward to seeing more World of Warplanes videos from you in the future.

[@SeaGoingLizabeth]

Jingles: "no don't laugh" Also jingles : laughs

[@Cowinspace]

Fuck me, they actually put in respawns? It seems that WG aren't completely brain dead after all. Shame that you still need to buy extra crew slots, WarThunder lets you keep and use every aircraft you've ever purchased. It's still no match for the way WarThunder does things but at least it's not complete garbage anymore.

[@go4it776]

Cowinspace its not gonna challenge WT yet but you see its starting to improve players start to get back again and if this keeps up in a few more years it can actually beat WT

[@franciscoostos8527]

but u cannot improve somethings to make it work,like damage model,and grind,

[@dgray3771]

The thing I learned here. Mighty Jingles advice "Shoot at the red things".

[@UlyssesJF]

WoWP2.0 and WoT HD Maps show exactly what WarGaming are capable of when they put time and effort into what they are doing. And they were being developed at about the same time... Are WarGaming changing?

[@evensong3356]

They are getting more competition, used to be war thunder was its only real (But laughable competition in anything but planes) but now there are quite a few tank and ship games popping about. I assume they want to stay ahead while they still are.

[@kajmak64bit76]

Gaijin has US national reserve Fort Knox much of money... which they do not spend back into the game...

[@TraustiGeir]

Uh, Jingles...the vast majority of your teammates and opponents were bots! XD

[@mickeficks]

"Where's Jingles?" "He's flying continuous circles 5 ft above the enemies lawn for some reason."

[@hyperdimensionbliss]

This actually look rather fun. Gonna install and take a go myself. Arcade battles at the controls of a Zero or Corsair? Sign my Pacific Theatre-loving ass up.

[@JustCallMeAlex]

I get World of War planes. Jingles says it sucks. I uninstall. Jingles Gets World of War planes. Says its good. I reinstall.

[@vitor19971104]

Jared Haak if Jingles told you to jump off a bridge would you?

[@Airrivalsgamer]

Nothing speaks agains that. Now, where's the nearest bridge?

[@_alex_6640]

The gnome overlord has spoken.

[@VelikiHejter]

Of course!!!

[@robertrichardson2120]

Vitor Carvalho: _"if Jingles told you to jump off a bridge would you?"_ Me: Well, not AGAIN, I won't!

[@wretchedexcess1654]

Thanks Jingles, I reloaded this after having been a closed beta tester disgusted with the original and I can confirm that I honestly had fun flying WoWP for the first time. Not as much fun as MS CFS was in "The Zone" back when but, good arcade fun.

[@jonas_k.123]

I got into ww2 games with world of warplanes, then KZbin started recommending warthunder videos and is started playing it.

[@patchouliknowledge4455]

3 Years later, and as a newer WoWP player, I have to say this is a blast of a game. May seem simple at first, but getting into the controls and various mechanics, it can get pretty interesting for wannabe fighter pilots for me

[@Zodchi]

jumped back onto warplanes a few weeks ago and i gotta say its actually enjoyable and relaxing to play

[@patchouliknowledge4455]

@@Zodchi Yep! The game really has gotten much better since the 1.0 days, and the grind ain't bad. Good luck on the current event!

[@Flambass]

Game is fun2play, as simple as that

[@Dysphoricsmile]

Flambass It would seem that WarGaming is REALLY stepping up their Game(s) as it were! Between the current WOT Sandbox which is F'ING GORGEOUS, World of Warships adding in more and more DX11 features, and now THIS! I sucked terribly on the Sandbox server, I am too damned busy gawking at the BEAUTY of it all, and checking out all tue new effects, while also watching my frame rates! And I SWEAR that Sandox WOT runs even BETTER than the current Live WOT, I play at 2560x1440 and in standard WOT I see abkut 122 FPS average, with the Sandbox client, I am closer to 138! I gotta say, I did NOT see this one coming! I thought WG had basically abandoned WOWP, but now? I NEED to try it again! Whatever WG did with their engine, it looks FULLY AAA, and runs BETTER THAN EVER! And for this, I applaud WarGaming immensely! Can't wait to check out WOWP 2.0, but I am currently busy with WOT SB!

[@ぬんぬんビム]

I decided to try WoWP again yesterday after not having played since closed beta. I'm not a flight sim guy, couldn't care less if "omg planes aren't behaving right!!!!" I had fun, will keep playing, and made a few hundred gold for tanks.

[@brkooduh66]

my WoWp broke a couple years ago, maybe I re-install and give it another whirl

[@753238]

But, Buying gold is proven as anti-aa :(

[@chocolatebar5663]

nope want a fun to play game??? Wot blitz is funner than this

[@Twoface227]

Bout 3 mins in, and gotta say... I'm impressed by the flak. Good sound, nice effect, gotta say they def. did that better than WT.

[@cardiv5zuikaku944]

yeah, that flak animation gots my attention.

[@Mono-tc3mq]

flak animation is way better than wt's one, so I hope they will improve it.

[@suzuyamogami5169]

WT could improve it . But it would take much ram as WT is a multi vehicle game . So it would make the servers lag so much

[@a-drewg1716]

but if they change it you wont get pilot sniped by a invisible flak shot from 4km away from the nearest AAA

[@Mono-tc3mq]

invisible flak shot? wut?

[@salamanderpete]

Thanks for this, Jingles. I'll be updating and playing. Hope to see some more WoWP content from yourself and others coming up :)

[@bramkool7814]

I've been playing this game quite a lot recently, and I'm glad you changed your opinion about it Jingles. I do however have to say that unfortunately it was not too surprising that you ended on top twice by personal points earned. If you look at the names of both teams you will find that both teams almost entirely consisted of bots. You can also tell by the 'plus' sign after each name being non-clickable. This means that in the first game there were only four actual players on both teams, and in the second game, sadly, only one player per team. Sorry to spoil the fun Jingles.

[@royalgleaves8117]

You have a calm and reassuring voice.

[@Aksuuuk]

why does it feel like world of tanks, warship and warplanes is in the same sort of universe as the cars movies are in where there is no humans and only tanks, warplanes and warships

[@Maktumekal_Ilzrei]

To be entirely fair, War Thunder isn't a whole lot better in that regard xD

[@kuiper921]

Cheezy McCheez WT has some infantry and such

[@VuHien2011]

you do see humans and they even die too quickly. I hate to have random pilot knocked out.

[@skyrimosity7842]

pc master race From now on I’ll think of the crew members of my E100 as Leichtraktors

[@brdfnick3886]

also we have humanoid warships, which we just call them, shipgirls, but it doesn't count because it's own game.

[@CarlosRios1]

I grinned when I saw the upload.

[@Spymask-AoC]

I grinned when I saw your comment.

[@Matsumoto77]

Must write essay... OH jingles it can wait, wait WOWP? MUST WATCH!!!!

[@jeremy4303]

I’m a heavy WarThunder player, but this looks pretty good right now for something really arcade-style to relax from sweaty high tier WarThunder games. If I see more good talk about it, it looks good to try out.

[@honnorgaurd]

Thanks for the review jingles. Maybe I'll give this game another try. As an alpha player I was horrified at the controls and how I had to fight my own plane more than the enemy just to shoot anything. Came back every now and then after release to see if things changed and was still left disappointed. I look forward to seeing soon how it is now

[@robloxdude19]

World of Warplanes?!? WHO ARE YOU AND WHAT HAVE YOU DONE WITH THE REAL JINGLES?!?

[@mladtheimpaler]

*Pulls out gun

[@slap-ft3tp]

Just shut the fuck up

[@TallulahSoie]

I really hope this is successful since War Thunder is a dumpster fire.

[@caelodevorago608]

The way I see it, WT and WOWp CANNOT be compared together. Same as ground battles in WT can't be compared to WOT. They are different kinds of games. I love WT AND WOT, I play war thunder when I want a bit more realism to the game, but when I get tired of shitty pilot snipes, horrid grinds, too many plane choices (Yes, I fucking hate how many variations of the same plane there are, especially where there are pretty much NO differences, maybe a few kph faster), I think I'll go to WOWp. There is nothing wrong with wanting realism, and there is nothing wrong with liking arcadey feels. Now, WOT isn't as arcadey as people think, armor is a thing. The only issue I have is a penetrating shot does damage even if the round went through the thin armor nowhere near anything important (A machinegun plate on top of the turret! THERE'S NOTHING THERE!) But with Warthunder, I hate the sluggishness to the tanks, I hate how precise you have to be sometimes, it just gets annoying occasionally. Yes, sometimes I want the game to hold my hand, so what? I don't have to GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS! "Git gud bru", I am good. I have fun when I have fun, occasionally I want to have fun a different way. So, everyone SHUT THE FUCK UP! Neither game is better nor worse than the other because THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT FUCKING GAMES!! What are ya gonna do next? Compare COD to ArmA?!

[@doas6311]

Caelo de Vorago I see why people like wot but I quit because of the dispersion and how stupid some weakspots are. Plus when they completely changed the player controlled arty which wt didn't have.

[@caelodevorago608]

And you know what? That's okay... Opinions are not fact. You can't say WOT or WT is bad. You can say you dislike it, but it CLEARLY isn't bad because of its success

[@doubleutubefan5]

At least you understand me. Even tho i would never touch WT again becuase its leveling system still confuses me... i agree with you whole hearted. A video game it's just something to have fun with and you can enjoy it anyway you want. the imaginations the limit. And sometimes I just want to play an arcade game whether it be Pac-Man or Need for Speed.

[@kierinburbank2383]

It dont matter which game is more better or advanced. They're still gonna have those asshole pay to play players. They pretty much just made it to where i load the game, get my daily reward and leave.

[@AnonyMous-yh3hg]

Caelo de Vorago meh.Arma is better.COD sucks.

[@royalteluis623]

Gaijin monopoly on this type of war games aren’t gonna change any time soon

[@Cosmic89147]

I absolutely love this game. It’s so fantastic. Having the tech tree makes you want to keep playing battle after to battle to be able to get that next engine upgrade or enough research points to get the next tier aircraft. Fantastic game.

[@Quadrenaro]

WoWP has a jet powered I-15. And we thought bias was bad in WT.

[@gu3z185]

wtf a jet I-15 ;-; BIAS BIAS :P

[@Quadrenaro]

The future filmmaker No it was defiantly a ramjet engine on both wings. I still have from when I was a beta tester.

[@Tommy1marg]

oh boy i have one :)

[@rsookchand919]

The game is improved I'm happy for them, I will definitely redownload

[@Ciborium]

"World of Warplanes doesn't suck anymore." -- Jingles High praise, indeed! Looking forward to more WoWP content from Jingles as he learns more about the controls and customization. I'll give it a go when I get home tonight.

[@dankash3124]

Bullshit ...... it sucks like CNN

[@TheMarineGamerIGGHQ]

I want a base system like that in War Thunder. Like they are in IL-2

[@cracklingvoice]

I clicked on this video, got an ad for War Thunder ... specifically aircraft. How very appropriate.

[@TheGimilkhad]

Take a look at the names of the ''players'' in those games 90% are bots.

[@The_Ossifrage]

I mean, there were a lot of bots back when the game first went open. There were more players when the game was in CBT.

[@derpenberg1946]

Peter Bacilek not uncommon wt cornered the market on planes , just like wot cornered it for tanks and ships

[@therealwildboar1007]

lol, Planes and Tanks yes... Ships?! XD I pre ordered that crap last year and still havent seen my river boat and haven't seen any of the others in ages either. WOWS owns that department.

[@Maxwell_Twist]

Carole Boarer Wait, are you saying that the game without land based physics owns the tank market or that WoT owns the tanks market?

[@sircasmda3rd]

Dunno if they brought it over to 2.0, but right beforehand the bots were kinda funny whenever they started talking in chat. It was kinda refreshing to see, especially when they started shit-talking each other

[@jianng7795]

Hahaha, good. Looks like I have something to play other than War Thunder now.

[@jianng7795]

I like my gameplay to be realistic but not to the point of pushing every button and flipping every switch.

[@peqbox]

Michael Bridgestales And not everybody is gonna but a HOTAS for a simple game

[@marktownsend2384]

Ummmm Jingles... If you look at all the names on both results screens, it looks like many of them in the first battle, and most in the second battle, are simple, capitalised names with no weird characters. I think they're Bots. There are obviously human players in the first game, with all sorts of random spellings, but the majority are computer players. Explains why you got the best score despite not knowing what to do and why your team lost both times.

[@General_Cartman_Lee]

First match was 3 vs. 4 human players, second one was 1 vs. 1, all the rest were bots. You can identify human players after the battle in the team list as they have this usable + button to the right of their name (I think it's to add them to your contact list). We'll see if this is because it's the first day of the new patch and if WoWP attracts more people in the next days or weeks.

[@shmekelfreckles8157]

Mark Townsend well, of course, pretty much nobody plays WoWp nowadays, especially on EU. Hopefully it will change.

[@peris_arts_film9699]

Mark Townsend No shit not many people played the game

[@killergames391]

The bots were added as a life support for the game. If the bots weren't added the game wouldn't be around today.

[@temojin9489]

"World of Warplanes...it doesn't suck" - The Mighty Jingles 2017

[@gamingrootz4411]

Been playing this laterly. Soo much more chill than tanks or ships. Helps that its easy, i suck at flight games.

[@ComaradComisar]

Oh boy, what a time to be alive.

[@emilspless2834]

I fell asleep listening to this and woke up thinking it was a random dream.

[@nyanator8110]

Well don't we all?

[@SnafuWT]

you can tell jingles was paid by WG to make this

[@Deimnos]

Jingles, i went on their site, and read about the conquest mode, as usual, you made a bit of a mess: The experience you get is actually represented by the "medal" icon and number, which in Conquest are called "Mastery Points" and they seem to be converted directly into experinece, are awareded mainly for completing objectives or taking down enemy aircraft, or achieving certain events(like setting an enemy on fire, getting a critical hit etc). The "lightning" icon is for "combat points" which are earned mostly by damaging enemy aircraft and ground targets, capturing points etc and they are related to credits.. i have no idea why they came up with other titles for experience and credits(on the results screen, as XP and credits are still XP and credits in the hanger) but WG i guess

[@chriskeith2927]

The one thing that makes this game conspicuous from their other titles as they actually show crew seated at the plane we never see crew in either World of Tanks or World of Warships is this going to be a trend and can we expect to see grew members in the other 2 games inquiring minds want to know....

[@boysenbeary]

Wow, its come a long way

[@aibohphobiafrfr]

Ok, I'm not going to say it's bad. Because it's not. It's done exactly what it needs to. And I'd like to take a minute to point out that War Thunder is exactly the opposite of World of Warplanes. War Thunder arcade is utter crap. It's just the most cancerous and just all round weird game mode because War Thunders engine is absolutely gobsmacking. Nothing so far has or atm will come close to its ability. It's suited so well to RB, it's manages to combine the blend of a vast majority of major controls on an aircraft in your hands. Multitude of Flaps, gear, cockpit opening, cockpit lighting, camouflages, throttle control, engine management, fuel amount and his it affects the aircraft's handling characteristics. and the list goes on. Flight models are also something that War Thunder nailed so well. Yes there have been discrepancies and borderline butchered FM's but overall they are fantastic. The Damage of the aircraft is also so realistic yet somewhat Controllable given the circumstance of your aircraft and how critical it is. You then have to add some competence to land a crippled plane. Manual input to keep it in the air. Landing is also a realistic prospect pilots faced and it's done very well. This all combined with the feeling of flying. Real plane in a wonderful looking g game graphically, it's got all the bells and whistles. However, the arcade is horrific. It's trying to be something it's not. Filling someone else's shoes. Those shoes belong to World of Warplanes and they've been filling these shoes while Watching sought out to correct it's flaws. And by the look of it the have. See, World of Warplanes could never house a Realistic game mode. It's 1, not got the type of game engine for that, 2, it's based around an arcade game objective, like it's brethrens World if Tanks and World of Warships which accomplish that VERY well. 3, it's revolved around hit points, which WT isn't. So for people to break the norm of WT arcade, it's difficult, but I believe once it's out for a while, people play it, it will refill the shoes WT has been trying to wear for the past 4/5 years. Finally it's found its place to call home. Just correct what was, and it's already 1 million times better than the cancer WT put together in arcade mode. Being a RB & SIM player, I can't really comment. So don't take this to heart. Just my thoughts. Input from people who play WT arcade would be great, World of Warplanes players too. And before you hate spam at me for saying WT arcade is shit, plz, try to be civilised.

[@NFchegg]

Mr Loominati WT arcade is nice at times, but it quickly devolves into who can spawncamp more and the rest of people on the deck who are just in a big swarm over the airfeild cap. what i have learned in RB has not and barely ever saved me from an arcade pleb. an mk1 spit or a russian plane climbing up to a b25 @ 6km alt, that is pure BS

[@martinsdaugins2116]

Most realistic thing in WT planes i love is - when you as an spaa KILL plane and that plane still able to stear-use machineguns and before crashing in to ground DROP FUCKING BOMBS..... gayjin nailed that part of reality. Cant imagine hows that possible when aircraft takes mulitple HE shots in to cockpit and or base of plane/explode in to few pieces and still act as a live plane. Then tanks should be able to shoot even after they get killed...no? Anyways, as much as i like how WT manage to make that game, but anything else is just booring grind with new tank models doing same and nothing new or special. Where higher you go, less armor does anything as everyone 1shot everyone.

[@fogrepairshipakashi5834]

Well.....shit.......I may want to reinstall it......Can we get some more videos after this?

[@Renzu-ZG_The_Chattino_Sailor]

The flame wars below is so entertaining, I need a truckload of popcorn and soda to read it in its entirety.

[@captainbear6188]

I beta tested WoWP back in its original instalment. this looks so much better then it did back then. The devs did have a good control set for a while, then they decided to make the controls over simplified, and that made it feel like a mouse curser chaser. so from this video I will be giving it a second chance. thanks Jingles

[@daneil0609]

it is a simple arcade game , good for you to blow off some steam

[@mrexists5400]

yes, we all know wt is still probably better, enough with those comments

[@skypeon4555]

World of Warplanes? Played by Lord Jingles? Who enjoyed it? WHO ARE YOU AND WHERE IS THE REAL JINGLES!?

[@SergioPorcu1]

Thanks for posting this Jingles. I actually re-installed WoWP after deleting it half a year ago cause I couldn't get a plane down. I played it and indeed it is fun and I am not half that bad actually. So thanks for convincing me to install the 2.0

[@oscarmuffin4322]

I think the one big gripe I had with World of warplanes is the control delay. There was quite a delay between moving the mouse and the plane actually doing anything. I played it once, looked up online how to fix it and then played it again. I gave up then because there wasn't a way to fix it. Some people say they had it others didn't. I can't see my self hopping back into it because I enjoy playing tanks in War Thunder, Haven't really put any serious time into aircraft games for a while now but glad to see it's gotten a re-do.

[@doc7000]

One thing that War gaming seems to just do better then War Thunder is they reward you for playing good even if your team doesn't win. If you way out play every person in the match on either team then you deserve the most experience and silver lions even if you don't win. This is because in a team game I have been in matches (in War Thunder) where I get 7 kills and there are only 2 other players on my team with a kill.

[@nerookari3548]

And the grind isn't as colossal

[@gu3z185]

No, the grind is even WORSE.

[@nerookari3548]

I played it and god, the game is still shit.

[@roys.1889]

Comments atm: 90% WT fanbois 10% people remotely interested in this game

[@duchessskye4072]

Well because this _is_ just a cheap copy off WT, that's reasonable

[@Cpl.Punishment]

So what does that make ground forces? Comparing the Wargaming titles to the Gaijin titles is like comparing Red Orchestra to Team Fortress two. You look like an edgy teen no matter which one you fanatically support.

[@roys.1889]

Cpl. Punishment gets it.

[@akustihakonen7928]

Roy S. I might play this alongside War Thunder. I don't care about the gameplay that much or which is better. I like the vehicles and I want to play as much of them as possible.

[@LucasSouza-jf1sm]

Roy S. Warthunder fanboy here... I'm here for Jingles comentaries

[@InservioLetum]

"doesn't suck anymore" That, Jingles, is the understatement of the year. Came here for a laugh, but got excited and set about installing before the halfway mark!

[@shaebakes4192]

As much as much as I have come to hate WG and Gaijian. This is very very interesting. I will never play any of their games again. If I want to play thanks, I'll go play steel beasts Pro, if I want flight, you got DCS, IL 2, and Lock on. However I believe personally, that the fact that WG is making world of warplanes and continuing to make it better, is going to make the War Thunder Deb get off their ass and realize they're going to start losing even more players. Which as Jingles has always said, means they will start working harder. Nobody wanted Modern tanks right now when it's impossible for most players to even get to the sub modern Cold War Tanks. We wanted ships something to compete on the same level as wargaming. So my hat is off to you or wargaming, I will never reinstall your games at this point. However you are helping the industry by creating Fierce competition, while not as beautiful or realistic, maybe that's enough to get War Thunder players to say, screw this I'm going to go over to the other game. Thank you Jingles is actually made my day better!

[@ijh4888]

nice to see you comment on something that's five months old just so you can call someone retarded

[@ijh4888]

my point is that it wasn't really necessary

[@amxelcbis5760]

Candy Van yes some war thunder players do play health bars based games like wot you idiot

[@amxelcbis5760]

Candy Van u didn't said true wt players

[@Reckec]

Jingles, you are praising your favorite "puppy to kick" !! lol, I tried it as well and I found the controls (a Really weak point in the old game) to be much better. The keyboard / mouse was better than the joystick but I think I could get the stick to work better with practice. I had to adjust the keyboard commands to match War Thunder (which I also only play w/mouse & keyboard) and I was able to make the changes and they worked. The old World of Warplanes was not like that. GG

[@PeakyBlinder]

Thrustmaster t16000 is the only way to play this. Get a yak 30 and no one gets near you.

[@carlpeters1278]

It's about time! Thanks Jingles. I was a beta tester on the game and haven't played in almost 2 years. Alot of input we gave during testing was ignored unless it was about bugs and glitches. Hopefully now we have the kind of game we wanted back then. I guess it's time to go find out! World of warplanes here I come.

[@FluppiLP]

I don't care how realistic a game is, tbh War Thunder is so realistic that it's frustrating to play. No game manages to make me frustrated in every match and as fast as war thunder does. You fly around, shoot down a few guys after a bit of a struggle. A Russian plane comes from one side and oneshots you without a chance to react. I don't care how realistic it is, it's unhealthy for the game itself. I don't know if World of warplanes does a better job there but from what I see in this video it very much could be doing a better job. Don't get me wrong, I like lots of things in War Thunder. Having a few holes in the wing and trying to land on an airfield for repairs only to realize that at landing speed there is not enough lift on the damaged wing gets me like nothing else. However if that is paired with frustration in every game even in the arcade mode it's just broken, imho. Don't get me wrong, I love racing simulations, proper racing simulations like rfactor 2 so I can appreciate realism if it comes in the right outfit. Like the developers of BF1 said in a press conference: We want to make it as realistic as possible but for balance we need to add fantasy into our games otherwise there are no automatic weapons and everyone plays the same gun. And that's what should happen. When the game has an arcade mode already why would anyone keep the part that is realistic but overshadowing the fun in the game with frustration? Please don't try to argue with me. This is my opinion that I built after about 100h of War Thunder. After uninstalling the game waiting some time and reinstalling it again. And I always come to this conclusion and I know other people that think the same. So you really won't change anything if you argue with me that what I just said isn't true. Because it is true, for me at least it is true.

[@NormanZealandMalana]

Don't tell people it's fun, Jingles! The chat will turn toxic!

[@colesonadams6194]

The comments are actually quite good here. What are you talking about?

[@NormanZealandMalana]

Orion Gaming It's a joke XD

[@Lennis01]

This isn't a mere upgrade to an existing game. It's more like a full-blown sequel that does everything better. I had no idea this was even in the pipeline. Could be one of the big gaming surprises of 2017.

[@fatherdaughtergaming]

I kind of find it fun, I don't do terrible when I use an older Logitech flight stick.

[@kasyu1101]

also, there is no target lead. wargaming doesn't use target lead indicators, because that's too easy. instead, you zoom in, calculate where to aim based on how fast it's going, and fire there, and adjust based on the damage you are doing, just like world of warships, but a million times faster.

[@maxs7452]

I always understood "Chasing Mexicans across the screen" :D

[@gu3z185]

l0l

[@gu3z185]

I'm mexican

[@cjy8465]

So how many of you had never played WoWP but still says it sucks because you just want a joke to laugh at?

[@laisy961]

Probably the same amount of people who say CoD WWII suck while didn't even touch the beta

[@spindash64]

I played it, and it was definitely eh. There are worse games out there, but there're better too. That's my stance anyway

[@Slayer_Jesse]

i played it when it was new, it really was that bad. ill give it a go only cuz my friend still played it for some unknown reason.

[@faque5634]

Wowp is garbage and so is COD WW2 for that matter.

[@faque5634]

War thunder is better.

[@dergrafvonzahl4734]

Not too bad, this can actually break WT... not in the sense that it's that much better. BUT, the one thing WT AB has going for it is that it'S pretty realistic even for an arcade plane game... mostly due to the fact that the basic physics are soft sim ready (as WT has an integrated soft sim with it'S SIM mode). WoWP being playable and a good game (from the looks of it) might be an actual competition to WT AB. And this is the problem, Gaijin would have to focus more on AB, the mode where realism is irrelevant. And all this talk of the WT AB fanboys about WT being superior because it'S more realistic, need to know that pandering to the AB portion of WT kills the realism. WT AB is never going to be realistic WoWP isn't either but WoWP has no ties more realistic modes they can be as wacky and fun as they want to be. WT AB can't without changing physics of all modes (AB/RB/SB share most of the game functions) and you will lose the RB and especially SB crowd. Also the AB players acting like WT is better because of the realism are the same acting against that realism in favor of their arcade playstyle over the RB/SB crowd... kinda hypocritical. For example the Rocket nerf was a direct result to have realistic outcomes of rocket attacks with mouse aim in RB/AB instead of realistic behaviour of rockets wich would result in realistic rocket attacks in SB... where the realism really counts. So no AB/RB players want the game to feel realistic not to be realistic... but they aren't actually into realism, and WoWP is able to afford the liberties WT AB can't. And when the AB players realize they never actually wanted realism wich deep down they might even already know as there is a "gameplay>realism" and "it's just a game" trend in WT. WoWP might have it's rework at the exact right time.

[@Mono-tc3mq]

good lecture but still some faults. wt AB mode is pretty good despite it has realistic ballistics: you're having fun with intense dogfights, ground attaking, bombing, with killing a bomber or killing a plane with gunners. RB mode is still well balanced + you earn 2.6 times more XP and SL than in AB mode. usually I play RB, but sometimes arcade. I have never played air sim(except some single missions) cs it takes lot of time, also you have to control your plane with realistic controls, but this thing is familiar to me because of air RB. while wowp is in BETA everyone is having fun, because everthing is paked with enjoyable ground attaks and nice explosion effects, but when there will be more players than bots the game will become boring, maybe at high tiers it will be ok, but everyone starts a game woth low tiers and when they see all of this they will just give up. also don't forget that the reason why 80% of players play aircraft game is dogfighting, which isn't in wowp. the game will die again and that will be THE final death. and I don't understand what you mean in rocket realistic aiming, because everything is fine and the nerf was made because of the game balance.

[@jdoriginals9223]

When you upgrade to like an ar 80 or a bf 109 b you get really close air battles and the dogfights are great! Plus the people are usually quite nice

[@154reaperfang]

Incoming plethora of Spitfire videos from Jingles

[@HaloStrategist]

It actually looks half decent. Shame it's made by WarFuckers and will inevitably be ruined like every other Russian Developer-owned game.

[@evensong3356]

Still the best option out there, I love wows and now wowp.. if only wot would get rid of the premium ammo

[@Speyde]

HP Bar... enough said why I will never play this game, that does not mean that this game is bad.

[@afj9557]

You must be new to wargaming... They have HP bars in every game they make!

[@ThePilot4ever]

Can confirm it is fun to play now

[@JakubChalupnik]

I did play WoWp a lot before WG has messed up the matchmaking. I got fed up waiting 15 minutes for 1vs1 game and I've stopped playing, but I was trying the game now and then to see if there's any progress. From my perspective, neither the graphics nor the plane handling has changed much. The graphics might be slightly better, but I am (and was) playing on various hardware, thus I never paid too much attention to graphics. Plane handling... well, it feels the same as it always felt - planes react the way I expect them to react: I-15 turns on a spot, while my beloved Tsh-2 takes a week to change the direction (yes, I do have higher tiers, but I somehow love causing havoc in Tsh-2). What I do like is disappearance of those lead-in markers. The 1st person view is pretty awesome. The sound effects feel better. I miss some sort of artificial horizon (is that the right term?). The new game mods are confusing, but I believe it's just a question of getting used to them. In general - I do like this new WoWp, but following the progress for a few years, I am not overexcited as Jingles is :) It is good, but it wasn't that bad as he thinks, at least not recently :) BTW: I do know WT. I've played it (both tanks and planes), and never liked it, I always considered WT as inferior to WoT and WoWp.

[@squirrelingsilver4048]

All we needed was a Jingles landing to round it all out.

[@ecpgieicg]

WoWP is still populated by bots I see

[@General_Cartman_Lee]

Considering bots are better than 50% of all players in online games there's nothing bad about it. :-D

[@TheKincognito]

General Cartman Lee Comment of the Day^^ So true

[@isaiahaguilera7710]

Give it time, Players will find this game but its not like the bots are bad, they are okay.

[@adamrules01]

You were playing against bots.

[@dabigboom8140]

most of the queue is bots, to few players to fill a match

[@aaronreyharo133]

first... hmm seems good... hope they open up a SEA server...

[@rcrgreen]

“No don’t laugh, just yet” *laughs right after*

[@computethisinfo]

You flew into Egypt half through the video then I got a 3 minute ad about Qatar and mentioned Egypt and I watched the whole thing.