The clean Wehrmacht myth is just one of so many rewritings of history - rewritings that are still happening today. Join the TimeGhost Army so we can bring you the real stories of our past!
@randomchannel-px6ho2 күн бұрын
As an American - please the rest of the world call what is happening here what it is. They're weak cowards who you should not be afriad of, don't back down and help the just here apply pressure
@Apnah132 күн бұрын
@@randomchannel-px6hoit's crazy lol.
@Camcolito2 күн бұрын
@@randomchannel-px6ho What are you talking about?
@aresee82082 күн бұрын
I am so tired of reading commenrs that state, (only) victors write the history. Losers have long written their own histories, and some have even become received wisdom among many people. So, stop thinking that only victors write the history is in any way an argument in defense of the horrible things losers have done while losing their war, nor is it even true amyway.
@WillN2Go12 күн бұрын
When anyone says, "Let's leave the past in the past." Speak up, "Oh so you mean, 'Let's make sure this happens again.'"
@boogerie2 күн бұрын
Hindenburg 1919: "We didn't lose the war we were stabbed in the back" von Manstein 1946: "I'm shocked! Shocked to find genocide going on here!"
@mind-blowing_tumbleweed2 күн бұрын
vpn Manstein: we didn't lose the war, we were stabbed in yummy back by Hitler
@Jakob_DKКүн бұрын
Remember the germans committed mass murder also in WW1 in Belgium. Not as bad as in WW2, but they still did it.
@Adelina-293Күн бұрын
I'm reminded of a similar scene in Casablanca. Captain Renault: I'm shocked to learn people gamble here. Waiter: Your money Captain. Captain Renault: Thank you.
@ollyx2Күн бұрын
Remember both events are war lies how much of a goy can you be?@@Jakob_DK
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's great that this video exists. But it wasn't just the army that was whitewashed, but the entire nation and this is still being done today. That is also the reason why historians, the media and Hollywood etc. are constantly talking about the Nazis and not about the nation in this context! Because if one use the term Nazis, the impression arise that only the Nazis were responsible for the crimes. This is the reason why Germans and western historians and media etc. are constantly talk about Nazis and avoid using Germans and Germany in this context. Unfortunately, the lie is spread successful that only relatively few Germans were Nazis. So that gives the impression that relatively few were guilty! In fact, the vast majority of Germans were supporters and follower of the German Nazi government and thus they were Nazis! Therefore it is necessary to use the terms German and Germany instead of the Nazis! For example one also use Japan and not the Taisei Yokusankai! The Taisei Yokusanka party was the fascist party in Japan, just by the way. So It is appropriate to use the term Germans and it is therefore necessary to speak / write in this context of Germans/Germany and not of Nazis! GERMANS! Why is it done that way? Why is it done that way? Why is the lie being spread of the few Germans who were responsible for the crimes? At first in 1945, the Americans had the right attitude regarding the Germans, as this educational film shows for the US Army. „Your Job in Germany - KZbin" kzbin.info/www/bejne/bYC4g2irq9hsl9k Then pragmatism prevailed over justice! Becaus after the war, the Americans believed the Germans would be useful as allies! So in the 50s, most of Germans became the ally of the West. (West Germany). The problem, however, was that they were completely amoral and degenerate. The West could not be allied to a morally degenerate nation that has murdered millions of children, among other crimes. The Germans were practically systematically washed clean to be tolerable as allies. So the Germans were washed clean by propaganda (Western historians / media / politicians / Hollywood etc.) and the blame was put on relatively few Nazis. For this reason, a white washing campaign was launched relatively early after the war. Actually, the German crimes are permanently relativized by Western propaganda. Yes, there are always good Germans in Hollywood movies about World War II, according to the motto not all were Nazis. It was only logical that a movie was given the title "The Good German". I could go on like this for hours and describe 1000 examples in which the Germans were separated from the Nazi guilt by Western historians / media / politicians / Hollywood etc. So please always talk / write about the Germans in this context. Never about the Nazis! One shouldn't take part in the whitewashing!
@Kraniumbrud2 күн бұрын
the idea of the innocent genius generals is so fuckíng persistant, I come across it constantly in my work as a historian
@erics79922 күн бұрын
It's been in every movie, every tv show, every conversation at every corner bar "If Hitler only would have listened to his generals ...'
@keithplymale23742 күн бұрын
So did I in reading my first history books in the 1970's-80's. But after the end of the Cold War a lot of what he is talking about came out.
@arrrchdukemax81922 күн бұрын
@@Kraniumbrud Me too. So as videos of ex Wehrmaht vets. "We have no regrets". "Wir hatten unsere Befehle".
@MikaelFlyer2 күн бұрын
They were fundamental in NATOs survival so therefore they were white washed.
@enzobuso59332 күн бұрын
"Only in a world this shitty could you even try to say these were innocent people and keep a straight face."
@peterfriedenspfeife92302 күн бұрын
I am so glad that you are doing this Legacy series, it wraps up all the loose ends that remained when the war ended.
@WorldWarTwoКүн бұрын
Thanks for the comment, we still have a few more things to cover like the Nuremberg Trials. Stay tuned.
@ralphranzinger4197Күн бұрын
@@peterfriedenspfeife9230 me too, combined with the late Spies and ties this really is a great way of Continuing a great format.
@bradyphillips1995Күн бұрын
This should be required viewing for anyone with a baseline interest in WW2
@patwiggins6969Күн бұрын
Applause to the young Germans who questioned their history!
@MrJeepmarineКүн бұрын
Grass roots history.
@enysuntra13479 сағат бұрын
Yes, they were very, very curageous, living during the Wirtschaftswunder and telling their elders who had to survive the NS time how they would have single-handedly defeated the NS state if they were born earlier. It wasn't "young Germans", it was older ones that broke their silence at the end of their lives. Some others, like Bauer, tried to hold the NS profiteers responsible the first opportunity they got. Then, there were the "badbad evil elders", who either had taken part willingly and then tried a lot for the younger generation to not get into a criminal system, and those who had to integrate a lot of people who had taken part in crimes into a new state. There are a lot of things that weren't done well; however, they were done by people who tried to build a state where something like the NS time could never, ever, happen again. In retrospect, it wasn't a good idea to keep the people in the justice system in place. Otherwise, old NS people could go on with their lifes if they didn't commit too severe atrocities, IF they kept their opinion to themselves and didn't try to rebuild a NS state. (Because of the Wirtschaftwunder, why should they?) This was unjust, but the Federal Republic still exists and isn't the worst of liberal democracies. Taking responsibility for history began in 1945, and got a boost when the system was well-established and the economy worked. It was from those beginnings to take responsibility for history BY THE OLD GENERATION "young Germans" piggy-backed onto and started to do loudmouth happenings.
@spartacus-olsson3 сағат бұрын
@@enysuntra1347 while you have a few salient points in there, it’s worthwhile to correct you on a couple of notes. The correction of the revisionism didn’t happen during the Wirtschaftswunder years, it happened during the Vietnam War protests, the student unrest of 68, and (significantly) the oil crisis. It’s strongly tied to a youth movement across the Western World that for better or worse reckoned with the past, and pushed things like the civil rights movement, gender emancipation, human rights, and individual liberties into the mainstream discourse of society. While you are correct that a) the Bundesrepublik was a serious and successful attempt at disabling a Nazi resurgence, and b) that a large part of the reckoning came from the NS Generation themselves, it would not have been possible without a tectonic shift in public discourse. That shift was largely brought about by the youthful discontent of the Baby Boom Generation, and carried forward by Generation X (full disclosure: I’m of the latter).
@awsomelightnin2 күн бұрын
I think that it's important to point something out in regard to Erwin Rommel; the prosecutors at Nuremberg knew that the main defence each defendant would give would be 'I was just following orders' so they looked for examples of when members of the German armed forces refused them. The best example they could find was Erwin Rommel's refusal of the Commando Order given by Hitler in October 1942 which instructed for all commandos to be executed upon capture even if they surrendered or were in uniform. This example enabled the prosecutors to show that it was in fact possible to refuse an order deemed to be immoral and shut down that argument as a valid way to justify the carrying out of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
@modest_spice60832 күн бұрын
Rommel's Afrika Korps, in coordination with SS leader Walter Rauff of the gas van fame, is responsible for the numerous concentration camps in Libya and Tunisia. After their defeat in North Africa, the Jews and other undesirables in the concentration camps were shipped to Europe.
@bringerofword46442 күн бұрын
choosing the most popular german general to use as a standard by which they ignore orders is a bad one, very few had popularity as a shield.
@AdamBrusselback2 күн бұрын
@@bringerofword4644did they deserve a shield at all in your view?
@marknieuweboer80992 күн бұрын
No German general or marshall was ever executed after disobeying orders. They were fired and placed in the Führer Reserve. Von Rundstedt (the one who probably comes closest to "clean hands") holds the record.
@mind-blowing_tumbleweed2 күн бұрын
@@bringerofword4644people praising Rommel forget that he was his bodyguard at some point, him wishing to get rid of his boss has little to do with atrocities
@Benaplus12 күн бұрын
When I was in high school, a WW2 vet came to talk about his experiences. He was taken POW by the Wehrmacht during the Battle of the Bulge He told us that he was surprised how well he was treated by the Germans. When he asked them about it they said "Oh, yeah, we're just soldiers. It's the SS who are really evil." Whether they genuinely believed that or not, it's unfortunate that this vet took that as the truth in the face of Nuremberg. As a kid hearing that from a firsthand source, *I* took that as the truth until I went to college and started reading about WW2 on my own. Thank you for your efforts to dispell this myth. It's unfortunately very necessary these days.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
But he was treated better by the regular German army ❤
@DruiceBoxКүн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb"better..." so he wasn't tortured and worked to death because he wasn't a jew! Aw good job to the german army!
@DerLoladinКүн бұрын
Thats a strange conclusion to draw from something like that. The statement from the Wehrmacht Soldier isn't false or a lie - yes, the Wehrmacht were enablers and at times even conductors of the genocide, but the SS explicit purpose and mission, unlike that of the Wehrmacht, was murder of civilians and "cleansing" the occupied areas.
@CarrotConsumerКүн бұрын
On the western front it has some truth to it. The SS did have a habit of killing POWs, see the Malmedy or Normandy massacres. The large scale Wehrmact war crimes were mostly on the eastern front, which is probably why it was easy for westerners to ignore.
@Tarnatos14Күн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb Belive me they treated the Soviets far worse.. in fact they even treated the soviest worse than there own standard said to treat.
@namegoeshereorhere50202 күн бұрын
I had a girlfriend when I was young who's father was in the Hitler Youth. Even though he was very young at the time he told me that pretty much everyone knew what was happening to the Jews to some degree. They may have not known the full extent about the camps etc. but nobody thought they were being treated well.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
Also he had no choice in joining. A lot of people replying on here are acting holier than thou yet one would have to be a super hero to stand against an authoritarian government's orders ❤
@Tarnatos14Күн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb Actually you cant say that. I have studied history in germany, so I know studies and primary sources in the language. There are far more examples where people had choices, in fact if it was not about direct resitance, a lot of people and actions which did not joined the Nazis in germany where not punished, or even changed nazi politics, because the Nazis where very eager to hold the german population peacful and cooperative. For example there is a whole study about Bavaria and the christian paralell societies in the small villiages, where a lot of stuff happened the nazis did not liked, even offcialy wanted to stop but they did not because they dont wanted to provoke the people there. Other examples are even on higher grades, whole commanders of military units who did not really followed the Kommissarbefehl where just overload, while yes others got no promotion or some degradation and still. There are even such examples as oskar schindler, who came through with his actions the whole time, and he was not a single person doing just stuff on his own, but an big industrialist. The reality was much more complex and between resistance and resiliance where abig difference, moste things people did and had actualy choices where no question to be "a super hero to stand against an authoritarian government" but more to stand out of certain paths which seamed easy, but not every otehr path was already a death sentence or a ticket to jail.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
@@Tarnatos14 are you trying to say that young people in Germany then didn't have to join the Hitleryouth if they didn't want to?
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
@@Tarnatos14 you are right in a way because my response to you was blocked. Proves that tyranny still exists. Even on this silly site.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
@@Tarnatos14 I'll try again
@amk49562 күн бұрын
This has done as much to poison our view of history as the lost cause myth. The old adage “the truth will set you free” has never been more prescient as generations are left prisoners of lies dooming them to make the same mistakes
@Apnah132 күн бұрын
There's power in the truth, my friend.
@jasonweitzel43932 күн бұрын
The notion that there is some absolute truth just waiting to be found is the exact thing that leads to people believeing in falsehoods so absolutely
@rick74242 күн бұрын
@@jasonweitzel4393 It is important to have perspective and understand nuance, but there are certain harder truths.
@angmori1722 күн бұрын
@@jasonweitzel4393what you said makes zero sense. Truth is absolute and objective. Sure, there are situations where perspective can be relevant, usually in the form of context which is made up of other, related truths. And people believe in falsehoods with fanaticism for emotional reasons, not because they believe that truth can be absolute. What relativistic garbage you spout
@angmori172Күн бұрын
@jasonweitzel4393 you sound like you need to take your meds
@doomhippie6673Күн бұрын
I was studying history at university back in the 1990. The Wehrmachts exhibition of 1995 appeared during my first semester in the masters studies. I took part in a course calles "Comparison of tank divisions of the Wehrmacht and the SS". The professor had even invited old veterans from both Wehrmacht and SS to take part. Very interesting class. At the end he showed a film shot by the grandfather of a student, who took part in anti-partisan war as part of a police unit. While he never filmed any direct attrocities I remember one scene very graphically - a few civilioans being lead behind a wooden bilding and one guard laughing into the camera while suggestively raising his pistol. Very disturbing scene. But for me personally the most disturbing thing was that I used to ride my bike to schoo on exactly the same street the soldiers marched on towards the train station to be shipped off to the front. I recognized many buildings and trees. Thinking back now: I rode that way 40 years ago and at that time another 40 years ago the policemen marched off to hunt partisans. I count maself lucky that I was born at a time of peace for Germany and I shudder thinking about what I might have done if I had been born just 40 years earlier...
@spartacus-olssonКүн бұрын
Thank you for sharing this. People outside our country often have a hard time understanding the experience of the last 50 years as the nation came to grips with what truly happened. The comparatively formidable and responsible way that Germany has addressed its past is admirable, and one of the key reasons that I chose to live here.
@poiuyt9752 күн бұрын
10:50 "The army would've won the war, if Hittler wasn't meddling..." Sounds like a line from Scooby Doo. :D
@massiarmy7512 күн бұрын
as funny as it sounds it is a possibility highly debated
@not2hot99Күн бұрын
@@massiarmy751Other than the fact some meddling by Hitler worked out well
@Tarnatos14Күн бұрын
@@massiarmy751 It is not. If Hitlwe wasnt meddling: first there would have been no war at all, so nothing to win, second there would be no "Sichelschnitt" through the ardennes. You cant seperate Hitler from meddling with the war, as the war was his meddling from the first point, and to cite Keitel about Hitler 1940: "der größte Feldherr aller zeiten" (greatest general/warlord of all times)
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
Unfortunately, my comment regarding the whitewashing campaign regarding the entire nation has been deleted. Strangely enough, the comment wasn't deleted when I posted it directly under the video. So if you're interested in the whitewashing campaign, you'll unfortunately have to look for my comment here and read it there.
@pathutchison7688Күн бұрын
And his meddling dog, Blondie.
@nelsonchereta816Күн бұрын
1946: "I was only following orders." "That's no excuse!" 1949: "I was only following orders." "You know you may have a point."
@christopherconard2831Күн бұрын
Please ignore those that did refuse to follow certain orders and were simply removed from their previous position. The idea of "It was follow orders or be shot" was made popular as an excuse later on.
@Jamarmy20122 күн бұрын
All the times that Indy said 'smiling' Albert Kesselring, and burned it into my brain. Now we know why hes smiling; and im upset that he was allowed any amount of control over the narative of the war and his own trial sentancing him to death.
@WorldWarTwoКүн бұрын
Thanks for watching.
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's great that this video exists. Unfortunately, the truth is rarely told and lies are mostly spread on this topic. Because it wasn't just the army that was whitewashed, but the entire nation and this is still being done today. That is also the reason why historians, the media and Hollywood etc. are constantly talking about the Nazis and not about the nation in this context! Because if one use the term Nazis, the impression arise that only the Nazis were responsible for the crimes. This is the reason why Germans and western historians and media etc. are constantly talk about Nazis and avoid using Germans and Germany in this context. Unfortunately, the lie is spread successful that only relatively few Germans were Nazis. So that gives the impression that relatively few were guilty! In fact, the vast majority of Germans were supporters and follower of the German Nazi government and thus they were Nazis! Therefore it is necessary to use the terms German and Germany instead of the Nazis! For example one also use Japan and not the Taisei Yokusankai! The Taisei Yokusanka party was the fascist party in Japan, just by the way. So It is appropriate to use the term Germans and it is therefore necessary to speak / write in this context of Germans/Germany and not of Nazis! GERMANS!
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
Why is it done that way? Why is it done that way? Why is the lie being spread of the few Germans who were responsible for the crimes? At first in 1945, the Americans had the right attitude regarding the Germans, as this educational film shows for the US Army. „Your Job in Germany - KZbin" kzbin.info/www/bejne/bYC4g2irq9hsl9k Then pragmatism prevailed over justice! Becaus after the war, the Americans believed the Germans would be useful as allies! So in the 50s, most of Germans became the ally of the West. (West Germany). The problem, however, was that they were completely amoral and degenerate. The West could not be allied to a morally degenerate nation that has murdered millions of children, among other crimes. The Germans were practically systematically washed clean to be tolerable as allies. So the Germans were washed clean by propaganda (Western historians / media / politicians / Hollywood etc.) and the blame was put on relatively few Nazis. For this reason, a white washing campaign was launched relatively early after the war. Actually, the German crimes are permanently relativized by Western propaganda. Yes, there are always good Germans in Hollywood movies about World War II, according to the motto not all were Nazis. It was only logical that a movie was given the title "The Good German". I could go on like this for hours and describe 1000 examples in which the Germans were separated from the Nazi guilt by Western historians / media / politicians / Hollywood etc. So please always talk / write about the Germans in this context. Never about the Nazis! One shouldn't take part in the whitewashing!
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's great that this video exists. But it wasn't just the army that was whitewashed, but the entire nation and this is still being done today. That is also the reason why historians, the media and Hollywood etc. are constantly talking about the Nazis and not about the nation in this context! Because if one use the term Nazis, the impression arise that only the Nazis were responsible for the crimes. This is the reason why Germans and western historians and media etc. are constantly talk about Nazis and avoid using Germans and Germany in this context. Unfortunately, the lie is spread successful that only relatively few Germans were Nazis. So that gives the impression that relatively few were guilty! In fact, the vast majority of Germans were supporters and follower of the German Nazi government and thus they were Nazis! Therefore it is necessary to use the terms German and Germany instead of the Nazis! For example one also use Japan and not the Taisei Yokusankai! The Taisei Yokusanka party was the fascist party in Japan, just by the way. So It is appropriate to use the term Germans and it is therefore necessary to speak / write in this context of Germans/Germany and not of Nazis! GERMANS!
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's great that this video exists. But it wasn't just the army that was whitewashed, but the entire nation and this is still being done today. That is also the reason why historians, the media and Hollywood etc. are constantly talking about the Nazis and not about the nation in this context! Because if one use the term Nazis, the impression arise that only the Nazis were responsible for the crimes. This is the reason why western historians and media etc. are constantly talk about Nazis and avoid using the name of the nation in this context. Unfortunately, the lie is spread successful that only relatively few were Nazis. So that gives the impression that relatively few were guilty! In fact, the vast majority of Germans were supporters and follower of the German Nazi government and thus they were Nazis! Therefore it is necessary to use the terms German and Germany instead of the Nazis! For example one also use Japan and not the Taisei Yokusankai! The Taisei Yokusanka party was the fascist party in Japan, just by the way. So It is appropriate to use the term Germans and it is therefore necessary to speak / write in this context of Germans/Germany and not of Nazis! GERMANS!
@thebunkerparodie63682 күн бұрын
Ian kershaw in his hitler biography also debunk the clean wehrmacht and the myth that had hitler listened to his general, he'd won when the general could make mistakes too
@HeathenDance2 күн бұрын
I have that. It's excellent.
@thebunkerparodie63682 күн бұрын
@@HeathenDance I got the condensced version in french, it also goes over wether hitler was socialist or not and kershaw doesn't portray hitler as one, the book also shows the mistakes didn't happened solely because of hitler
@Paladin18732 күн бұрын
Rehabilitating the reputation of the Wehrmacht is akin to picking up a turd by the clean side.
@aaronkrucoff51812 күн бұрын
Best example I've seen
@fredthemagnificentКүн бұрын
Well put.
@celticman1909Күн бұрын
New one for me. I like it.🤔 Perhaps I'll borrow it. Thanks
@billhester8821Күн бұрын
But....but....never mind
@Sergi88998Күн бұрын
Jesus, this chapter is especially outrageous after following the events of this war for 6 years... Definitely a fitting ending to this dark period.
@nosajybsorcКүн бұрын
Sounds like the Wehrmacht generals learned a lesson from the Daughters of the Confederacy-losing the war, but winning the historical narrative.
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's certainly not just the German generals who did that. Western politicians, media and historians etc. are primarily responsible for whitewashing this nation as a whole.
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's certainly not just the German generals who did that. Western politicians, media and historians etc. are primarily responsible for whitening this nation as a whole. Ridiculously, comments are deleted with the term made up of wash and white, which is why I use the term whitening. I actually used the term with wash and white in my comment that I posted directly under the video and that comment was not deleted.
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
That's there because they are very involved in whitening this nation.
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
It's certainly not just the German generals who did that. Western politicians, media and historians etc. are primarily responsible for that. I mean whitening this nation as a whole. I word the comment so awkwardly because my comment was deleted and I worded it differently so that it wouldn't be deleted.
@GreatPolishWingedHussarsКүн бұрын
Ridiculously, comments are deleted with the term made up of wash and white, which is why I use the term whitening. I actually used the term with wash and white in my comment that I posted directly under the video and that comment was not deleted.
@LizzyMeyer-g1d2 күн бұрын
Anyone who thinks that any army is completely ‘clean’ is crazy. (Not saying this in defense of the German army, just saying).
@tsarfield58352 күн бұрын
Agreed, but clean of the Holocaust and other atrocities is a whole different thing. Not comparable to every other army, and you know this.
@nathanl40832 күн бұрын
There is a big difference, all these clean wehrmacht guys where active fans of Hitler, disliked democracy, where ant-semites, agreed with disregarding the geneva convention ect ect. No army is innocent but some are nazis and others are not
@LizzyMeyer-g1d2 күн бұрын
@ yes, of course.
@brandonlance36012 күн бұрын
@@tsarfield5835different than allied 'De-housing'?? Please enlighten me..
@unnefer0012 күн бұрын
@@brandonlance3601 De-housing=genocide?
@simonsimonovic4478Күн бұрын
The number of people who still believe that the Wehrmacht was clean and righteous is worrying. You did a great job with this video !
@lorenzg59122 күн бұрын
As a kid I listened to my grandfather's stories about the war. He told my a lot of the atrocities he witnessed, but still insisted that "his" unit was always clean. I think he could not accept that he was part of such a monstrous crime and wasted his best years (he was born 1920, so he effectively spent his whole 20s as soldier)
@DavidMcdonald-df8tb2 күн бұрын
It's possible his unit wasn't involved in the Holocaust. Almost every front line soldier in every war killed civilians either on purpose or by accident ❤
@lorenzg5912Күн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb As far as I know he was mostly Pilot for the Luftwaffe (until there were no planes left to fly). Still he witnessed the crimes (hanged "Partisans", burned villages,...), mostly in the east. The time in france must be relativly chill until ´44
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
@@lorenzg5912 it doesn't sound like he did commit crimes against humanity. Many allied soldiers certainly did.
@leonodonoghueburke4276Күн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tb David, why are all of your comments under this video attacking the allies and defending the Nazis?
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
@@leonodonoghueburke4276 I'm defending the truth. People are forced into things and it's a bit unfair to judge them when you have not been forced into the same situation
@Binyamin197222 сағат бұрын
As a trial attorney for the last 30 years, I truly marvel at this presentation. You have distilled from thousands of documents the most illuminating and damning quotes. Your "demonstratives," or graphics, are brilliant at proving your claim. I know how much work it is to compress this vast body of evidence into 24 minutes. Well done!
@spartacus-olsson21 сағат бұрын
Props go to James Newman who researched and wrote this. I’m very critical when someone else writes for me, especially a topic like this that is within my speciality, so I usually end up making a lot of changes to both content and script. In this case it was as close to a home run I’ve received - only minor changes for language and extra clarity on my part.
@bobmetcalfe9640Күн бұрын
It wasn't just the generals. The army had to issue orders forbidding soldiers from going along to watch Jews being shot in the USSR and Poland and filming and taking photographs of it. There is a German guy on KZbin somewhere who shows the actual order. They knew, they obviously approved - at least some of them.
@stevew6138Күн бұрын
I think it was in the book, "The Nazi Doctors" a passage going something like this, "All you have to do in order to get good men to do horrible things is convince them of the "rightness" of what is asked of them."
@alanhilder1883Күн бұрын
The old " God is on our side" bit. Still in use today to control the masses.
@marcel-ifc17Күн бұрын
@@alanhilder1883 Yes, military graves all over the world are filled with the bodies of (mostly young) men who were convinced that 'god was on their side'.
@ralphranzinger41975 сағат бұрын
@@stevew6138 a powerful and true Statement!
@Kevc0021 сағат бұрын
Read an interview with a German infantry sergeant in the Heer who had served on the eastern front. He hadn't been a supporter of the Nazis because his parents were Bavarian Catholics and supported the Centre Party so he was a bit removed from the party politics. When he was asked about the Holocaust he said that they weren't aware of the extent of it, but they knew something was happening to the Jews. He never saw the camps or the mass graves because they were rarely off the front lines. So if a random sergeant in an infantry battalion knew something was happening then the Generals absolutely knew what was going on in detail. The sergeant said that even if they didn't know what was going on that half the guys in his unit would have cheered if they knew. He found it hilarious that in 1944 they talked of Aryan supremacy openly and proudly, and in 1946 it was peace and love to all men.
@bobmcbob9856Күн бұрын
I love to see the 17 million number used, focusing on all holocaust victims, not just Jews. Not that I have an issue with educating on Jewish victims, it’s absolutely essential, but as the descendant of Slavic holocaust victims, I obviously like when that side of it also gets attention.
@MrZauberelefantКүн бұрын
Not to forget the sintezzi/romanji, LGBT, socialist and communist victims.
@ralphranzinger4197Күн бұрын
@@bobmcbob9856 💯 true, It is a shame how nobody wants to remember the whole story. Cruelty was an both sides, often worse, sometimes less.
@kindlingkingКүн бұрын
@@ralphranzinger4197because even before the war has ended americans decided USSR is going to be their main geopolitical enemy, therefore the ground has to he created for the future confrontation. In practice this meant that in the west nazi crimes were reduced to just the genocide of jews and little more, leaving twice as many killed soviet people swept under the rug, because, you know, soviets are actually worse than Hitler and were the enemy the whole time! An interesting consequence of this is, since the understood evil of nazism is tied entirely to their mistreatment of jews, the latter going on their own genocide arc allows german nazi apologists to say "well, you see, jews ARE bad, therefore nazis weren't THAT evil". Of course from russian (or belorussian and polish but nowadays not so much from ukrainian) perspective jews being bad or not makes no difference - germans burned thousands of villages, brutally murdered millions of people and were going to starve to death the entirety of Eastern Europe.
@bobmcbob9856Күн бұрын
@@MrZauberelefant Absolutely. I think the 17 mil includes them, and at least in the west “Gypsies and Homosexuals” is the second most widely known group of victims, after Jews, I feel
@DeridusКүн бұрын
Tribalism at its worst. At this point, the 6 million matter to me far less than the other 11 because the majority get barely a fraction of press.
@kennagel8088Күн бұрын
A US general said " why are we taking advice from the Germans? They lost 2 wars"!
@Jarod-vg9wqКүн бұрын
😂.
@Jarod-vg9wqКүн бұрын
World wars even!
@brentsutherland6385Күн бұрын
Yeah; Ho Chi Minh is who they should study at West Point
@madgavin7568Күн бұрын
Out of curiosity, which US General said this?
@clasdauskasКүн бұрын
True, but at least they turned up in time.
@m.a.118Күн бұрын
You're gonna rustle some Wheraboo jimmies with this one.
@WorldWarTwoКүн бұрын
Already happened , and they were mostly turned around as they came in the door. If you spot any new rodents, feel free to alert us.
@helmortkuper2626Күн бұрын
@@WorldWarTwoyou call people rodents? I thought that is the bad guy rhetoric?
@tsarfield583521 сағат бұрын
@@helmortkuper2626I would call them victims.
@thinusconradie4297Күн бұрын
Our deep gratitude to that generation of German historians who did the work of helping to dispel the myth of the clean Werhmacht. And, as always, our thanks to the WW2 in Real Time team.
@DonIgnacioAКүн бұрын
Rules of civility and this platform's guidelines prevent me from writing what I feel should've been done. Justice wasn't just prevented, or cheated, but proven to be only for "lesser men" while "great men" write history and enjoy the spoils.
@tami81102 күн бұрын
Its a shame to see people in the comments just answering with whataboutism to such a topic
@WorldWarTwoКүн бұрын
We try to keep the comments section civil, thanks for watching.
@DeridusКүн бұрын
Whataboutism is one of those things where I tend to take at face value, but it is very frustrating no matter how valid a point is brought up. Nothing to be done for it but persist in upholding virtue.
@DeridusКүн бұрын
To the crew (that means you too, Sparticus), I hope you are taking care of yourselves; this can't be easy to be the voice of the past when covering such dark subjects.
@twoheart78132 күн бұрын
“The only thing new in the world is the history you do not know.” ― Harry S. Truman
@TheMexxodus2 күн бұрын
I wonder how the East-German Nationale Volksarmee dealt with former Wehrmacht officers? The Eastern Front was undeniably a showcase of the Wehrmachts active involvement and participation in the extermination war. So Eastern European countries must have some reaction to rehabilitating former Wehrmacht officers in the Volksarmee of the GDR?
@marknieuweboer80992 күн бұрын
There is a YT channel devoted to East Germany with a video about this topic. The communists were even bigger hypocrites.
@MrZauberelefant2 күн бұрын
Not like to get a say in the WP if Moscow says otherwise.
@Adam-g01Күн бұрын
They disliked it but couldn’t do anything because Stalin but it’s why east Germany didn’t invade Czechoslovakia in 1968
@salty44962 күн бұрын
A comment to show my support for the channel, and for the YT algorithm
@Gogmosis2 күн бұрын
You get a like for that.
@Steeyuv2 күн бұрын
@@Gogmosis two
@robertbloch10632 күн бұрын
Yes, there really is nothing to add here. Just satisfy algorithm.
@paultapner27692 күн бұрын
@@Steeyuv three
@ChapladКүн бұрын
I too interacted with this video
@YorozuyaGinChan2 күн бұрын
Hello Mr. Olsson great video as always props to you and your team. However one thing I couldn't help but notice that your hands were shaking during some of the close up shots. I hope you are healthy . You and your team are truly a gem to the History community.
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
I’m fine, but I have a congenial tremor in my hands that is unfortunately progressive. I used to be able to mostly control it, but it’s getting tricky with the years. It’s harmless though irritating. Thanks for your concern though, and your kind words.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
I have the same condition. My father and his father had it. The funny thing is that it bothers everyone else more than me ❤
@spartacus-olssonКүн бұрын
@ same here, got it from my dad who got it from my grandmother. You’re right about other people, but it can be a bit of an issue in situations where people expect you to be nervous so they think you are. I usually preempt by just telling them before it gets all awkward. When he was still working, my dad nearly lost a big contract over it. Client saw him having a bear at lunch, and assumed shaking plus beer at lunch must equal serious drinking problem.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
@@spartacus-olsson I agree. It's annoying when people think I'm nervous about something when I'm not. I'll use your technique and just tell them my condition.
@davidkinsey86572 күн бұрын
Just like the "Lost Cause" myth of the American Civil War, the "Clean Whermacht" myth puts the lie to the old adage: "History is written by the victors."
@Significantpower2 күн бұрын
Yup. It's written by survivors
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
@@Significantpowerposterity…
@CruelDwarf2 күн бұрын
It was very much written by the victors. Because mad ramblings of former Nazis were only disseminated around by the blessing of their new American masters. Without US backing, nobody would know about any of that.
@404Dannyboy2 күн бұрын
History is written by the people who write. Both lost cause and clean Whermacht myths have had all too much ink dishonestly put to paper to spread them.
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
@ that’s an odd statement considering much historiography we have about the Vietnam War which clearly does not paint the US in a very good light. Also, that war was the first war reported on by independent journalists broadcasting live on location. It’s fair the first televised war even. Famously that reporting outraged the world, and launched widespread protests against America. I truly fail to see any validity to your point. A’s for the Middle East… that’s a region, what event(s) are you referring to?
@rationalbasis2172Күн бұрын
When Stalin learned of the torture and killing of Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya by members of the Wehrmacht 197th Infantry Division, he ordered that every member of that German division be killed rather than taken prisoner. When the U.S. learned of the torture and killing of Zoya, they did everything they could in the postwar environment to suppress the story - in cooperation with the criminals who perpetrated it.
@평양시115 сағат бұрын
Ironically, Ukrainians just demolished statue of Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya and the US support them.
@평양시115 сағат бұрын
Ukraine just demolished statue of Zoya, and the US support them.
@dimamatat55482 күн бұрын
Thankfully, the Bundeswehr learned from the Wehrmacht's mistakes and follows a strict code of conduct to avoid war crimes.
@matiasgomezvicuna8554Күн бұрын
hahahahhahaha
@dragonstormdipro1013Күн бұрын
You're INCREDIBLY naive to think they'll follow that in a proper peer-war.
@dimamatat5548Күн бұрын
@@dragonstormdipro1013 What do you mean? They didn't do anything questionable in any joint operations, sich as during the War on Terror. Plus, all those war criminals are long-dead.
@dragonstormdipro1013Күн бұрын
@@dimamatat5548 They barely involved themselves with the combat, serving mainly as peacekeepers. Furthermore, we don't know if they were innocent either. Just like clear Wehrmacht myth, there's a heavy chance that wrongdoings by their side are being whitewashed.
@평양시111 сағат бұрын
At least 8 bundeswehr members just got wasted in Russia, Kursk region. There are reports of foreigners committing crimes against civilians.
@TrickiVicBB71Күн бұрын
I hope this video is shown to a lot of kids that are in history class. I finished school 12 years ago. Even I was taught this myth and, my friends. We all loved WW2. Believed it. I only stopped believing in the myth when I came across a video by KZbinr called 3 Arrows in 2019.
@WorldWarTwoКүн бұрын
Thank you for the comment.
@phyarth80822 күн бұрын
Franz Halder which besides planning also was responsible for provisions of Wehrmacht and exist documents where train convoys with prisoners towards extermination concentration camps had priority over trains convoys with provision to Wehrmacht. So he allowed starvation of own army without food and ammunition's to allow exterminate more "enemies of the state". That is dedication without "Madman Hitler" orders.
@naveenraj2008eeeКүн бұрын
Hi Sparty One of the most important topic you covered. Many speaking about the clean wehrmacht but as you said at the end of the video it is impossible without armed force support so many people killed. Most escaped justice. But we need to remember and never forget
@danielnavarro537Күн бұрын
German generals' greatest defense at Nuremberg: "We were just following orders." Allied prosecutors: "Following orders for what?" Its interesting to note that generals from nations that were very authoritative or enacted crimes against humanity tend to have a narrative that the military was freed from politics. This is noted in the Confederate States of America, Burma, Rhodesia, and many more. They say victors write history. I think its clear to say, losers write history in their visions.
@robertjarman370312 сағат бұрын
War is politics by other means, said one famous Clausewitz.
@valerytaubin87282 күн бұрын
The Sonder commands couldn't operate without the Wehrmacht
@dariusalexandru95363 сағат бұрын
yes they could
@eliasvonbrilleКүн бұрын
The thing which I immediately noticed is his pronunciation of German being absolutely incredible. This guy isn't German is he? If not he must seriously know his stuff.
@spartacus-olssonКүн бұрын
I’m not German, but I live in Germany since almost three decades, and I’m married to Astrid, who is German. Our daughter Anna insisted that I speak German to her when she was little, and what don’t you do for your kids… I’m thankful for it 😉
@eliasvonbrilleКүн бұрын
@@spartacus-olssonThat's amazing! I was surprised to see an English speaking Historian suddenly perfectly pronounce Names like Schellenberg and Reichenau
@butternutmunchkinКүн бұрын
Watching this video reminded me of the late Kurt Waldheim, the former president of Austria. While he was running for the said position in 1986, the revelation of his service in Greece and Yugoslavia during World War II, and of his knowledge of Nazi atrocities as an intelligence officer the Wehrmacht, raised international controversy. Many other public figures in Austria, Germany and other European countries also had their careers marred by revelations of their association with Nazi Germany through their former service in either the Wehrmacht or the SS.
@greenockscatman2 күн бұрын
Sadly the myth has taken hold. In fact I had someone on Twitter saying most of the SS were ordinary people the other day. Seems we’re all too eager to forget.
@mikebunting72622 күн бұрын
We're about to be reminded again after 1/20/25
@Stahlkralle442 күн бұрын
Most of SS-Member were indeed odinary people - that is the crucial and horrific fact about us humans.
@Camcolito2 күн бұрын
@@Stahlkralle44 Excellent point.
@getsomeboy3212 күн бұрын
@@mikebunting7262the wall isn't to keep people out, it's to keep liberals in
@fabianustertius6460Күн бұрын
SS members where probably chilling like the british colonial troops keeping the colonies of india (keeping food to england causing a starvation there of millions) and parts of africa in order, you know showing who is the master, the hipocrosy is palpable even to this day from the anglo allied victors.
@BeneckiКүн бұрын
Thank you for your work! It's so important to debunk the mysth.
@dziban30316 сағат бұрын
No surprise at all that elon musk touts the clean Wehrmacht b.s.
@shlomomarkman6374Күн бұрын
It's a social thing. Command officers of all countries are like a caste and they feel more connection to command officers of the other side then to their own troops. This sentiment is not new but it's a carry-over from the middle ages - knights Vs peasants and it could be observed almost in every war since Charlemagne.
@paultapner27692 күн бұрын
Growing up in Britain in the 70's, we had weekly anthology comics. Some of which were war based. Usually telling stories of plucky Tommies running rings round German Soldiers. Who would say 'achtung schweinhund!' or 'verdammit Englander!'. They did fairly regularly run stories from with German lead characters. Usually an honourable soldier who would have to Battle nasty SS men as much as they battled Allied troops. I remember saying once 'why is it always the nice Germans? Why not do a story about the nasty Germans?'. You don't know any better when you're ten years old. One well remembered story 'Hellman of Hammer Force' was about an honourable tank commander trying to fight his war with honour. And coming against the SS every so often. That was reprinted recently in two volumes. It didn't stand up quite as well as I remembered. But when it gets into 1945 it doesn't entirely pull it's punches. We see civilians murdered by the Red Army. We see Hellman and his crew find a concentration camp. And how the fanatical Hitler Youth member of his crew reacts to that. So I give it some points for trying.
@giojacycadalzo75210 сағат бұрын
So a combination of geopolitical necessity in the face of the Soviet threat, naivety on the part of the Allies, and a genuine admiration of the German general staff’s tactics and strategy all contribute to the Clean Wehrmacht myth. An unfortunate situation that I’m glad is being remedied now as more and more historical works are being made denouncing it
@keithplymale23742 күн бұрын
A lot of this came out after the Wall came down and archives were opened with the end of the Cold War. I agree with Spartacus never forget.
@IrishEyeКүн бұрын
When history meets realpolitik, history always loses.
@kantemirovskaya1lightninga30Күн бұрын
Holy crap Sparty...this is a serious episode I hope all pay attention to...As someone who speaks/reads/writes the German language. I have to say to the innocent that even today I can go into German homes and find MANNEQUINS dressed in Nazi SS uniforms-yes even in 2024... in the North and the South of Germany, Never forget
@kantemirovskaya1lightninga30Күн бұрын
hmmm, i might add, even within 2 city blocks of Astrids ancestral home.
@rannyacernese6627Күн бұрын
People want to believe the ordinary people can’t act like monsters
@aegis64852 күн бұрын
The "Clean" Wehrmacht myth was just the German adaptation of the Lost Cause myth from the US.
@DavidMcdonald-df8tbКүн бұрын
True but can you name a country that has not committed crimes against humanity ❤
@DruiceBoxКүн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tbI can name quite a few that didn't systematically murder millions!
@295PhoenixКүн бұрын
@@DavidMcdonald-df8tbAntarctica?
@christopherconard2831Күн бұрын
The Lost Cause myth didn't really become popular until after WWII. The 1950's through the 70's had a lot of history being "reexamined", or being rewritten.
@shaider1982Күн бұрын
Another problem with the Wermacht's general, those that were executed that is, they blamed everything (i.e. military reversals)on Adolf Hitler while not saying their own mistakes.
@ronjohnson69162 күн бұрын
The Lost Cause folks are the champs here. Still this was a remarkable "clearing" of their record.
@roymartin5002 күн бұрын
Thanks Sparty & team. This is an all around excellent episode. Great job!
@WorldWarTwoКүн бұрын
Thanks Roy!
@thebunkerparodie63682 күн бұрын
also for the algorythm, can't wait for the nuremberg videos
@WorldWarTwo2 күн бұрын
Coming soon, stay tuned.
@Bratstvoijedinstvo1945Күн бұрын
It was the Wehrmacht that conquered Poland, western Europe, and large swathes of Russia. Those conquests brought the Nazi regime to control those areas, and with them the mechanisms of extermination. Hitler's ultimate goal was a war on 'world Jewry' and the Wehrmacht was his central instrument to accomplish this goal. German generals denied this complicity. Most came from higher aristrocratic backgrounds, assured of themselves and their status in society, used to living a privileged lifestyle. Small wonder so few had the self-reflection or conscience to look critically at their wartime deeds. And a great shame that so many escaped punishment for their crimes.
@jasonmussett21292 күн бұрын
Excellent as always. The book Myth of The Eastern Front throws more light on the so called 'Clean Wehrmacht'.
@JohnLane-h4rКүн бұрын
Never has the saying “ The enemy of my enemy is my friend “ seemed to be so widely accepted in error 😢
@richalexandersen55242 күн бұрын
excellent presentation. Thank you.
@WorldWarTwo2 күн бұрын
Thanks for watching.
@frostyrobot7689Күн бұрын
A great study. I knew this before but your presentation was very compelling.
@JohnDoe-iq5xv2 күн бұрын
If you step back, your argument of 17 million killed people is very powerful. Just from the logistics and purely organizational point of view, Einsatzgroupen even supported by local police units and the population, would have been unable to organize this scale of massacre. It is not only the bullets at the end. All those people being detained first, most probably "housed", patrolled, and transported. They may have been killed right away (on the spot), but that means that the front units of Wehrmacht were still present, and the area was under their jurisdiction.
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
So true - the scope of this murderous undertaking and 12 million enslaved or pressed into subsistence labor, mostly _inside_ Germany itself is also what makes any statement of ignorance by Germans of the time patently absurd.
@JohnDoe-iq5xv2 күн бұрын
@@spartacus-olsson Just wanted to say thank you, guys, for the series that you are producing.
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
@ 🙏🏼
@robertjarman370312 сағат бұрын
@@spartacus-olsson And where do you get most of the 17M victims from if not with the help of the Wehrmacht? It would be rather challenging for the Germans to do anything genocidal in Poland or Austria or elsewhere without the Wehrmacht.
@spartacus-olsson11 сағат бұрын
@@robertjarman3703absolutely - our human mind can’t really process the impact of such numbers, so it’s not understood what it means. The reality is what you said.
@unklezam787320 сағат бұрын
That happens when Franz Halder (Chief of the General Staff of the German Army High Command) writes history. He even got the Meritorious Civilian Service Award in 1961.
@gurufabbes12 күн бұрын
I think many people watching may find what is said here to be fairly banal, obvious: Of course the German army was involved in war crimes, of course wide parts of society after the war were rehabilitated after pro-forma "denazification". I think there's a generational gap that even I have noticed. If you had the pleasure of speaking to Germans of the post-war boomer generation, they will tell you that there was a long gap of silence in the 1950s and 1960s, that German society would not talk about what had gone on (though wouldn't deny it either) and most definitely would not talk about the responsibility or past of those now in office in West Germany. Yes, there were of course a number of trials for those directly responsible, but the question of the larger role of everyone else was not addressed. It is further events like the Holocaust TV special in 1978, the Ostpolitik of the late 60s and the publication of the Braunbuch that caused sea changes towards remembrance and a reevaluation of German's of their history. But before that, a lot of this stuff was not banal and the clean Wehrmacht myth remained the coping mechanism of post-war Germany. I also remember when there was the "Verbrechen der Wehmacht" exhibition in the early 2000s which made the rounds across large parts of the German speaking world particularly to condemn this myth. I did go to see it when it came, and do remember being shocked at the very graphic nature of the photos from the Eastern Front.
@richardlahan7068Күн бұрын
Why you would put German Army officers in charge of writing the history of German wartime operations is beyond me. Their assessments should have been viewed a suspect and unreliable.
@volodyadykun64902 күн бұрын
Great work as always, you're doing big important thing
@WorldWarTwo2 күн бұрын
Thank you for the comment, we appreciate it!
@kidmohair8151Күн бұрын
these campaigns to sanitize also gave the ideology, and the idealogues, of fascism a boost in right-wing political circles in the west, and also, recently in the former soviet bloc. the evidence for this is to be seen in the resurgence of authoritarian and xenophobic régimes in Europe and the Americas. never forget. (although it seems we are forgetting)
@damirsirotic052Күн бұрын
People who grew up in Yugoslavia had no delusions about a "pure" Wehrmacht.
@welcometonebalia9 сағат бұрын
Thank you.
@DerLoladinКүн бұрын
Really important and very good video on the topic - not take away from this, but will there be a similar one on Allied crimes and the complete lack of accountability for their leaders? (Tokyo Fire Bombing, Laconia Incident, Patton as a general leader, Paratrooper orders on D-Day etc.)
@spartacus-olssonКүн бұрын
I’ve covered those of course, and I will make a video about a complicated and controversial concept called reciprocal response in connection to the upcoming Nuremberg Trials coverage. SPOILERS BELOW. Beyond the obvious fact that it’s tricky to prosecute your own leadership, there was a legal issue. A common law in the customs of war was understood to be unaffected by the Conventions of the Hague. In oversimplified terms it meant that if all belligerents used an illegal practice, even if one party started it, it was to be considered legal for the purpose of the conflict in question. This could arguably be applied to for instance strategic bombing, despite that targeting civilians was clearly in violation of the Conventions of The Hague. Although not all legal scholars agreed, and still don’t agree that the law applied, the doubt was enough to not pursue some types of crimes. This was applied to both sides, so for instance; neither Arthur Harris, nor Albert Kesselring were charged with the crime of deliberately targeting civilians by terror bombing, although both did it. Then there’s the whole issue of winners and losers, but a) don’t expect too much there, generally speaking the criminal energy on the Axis side wildly outdid the Allies - even when you include the Soviets. And b) for a more nuanced and comprehensive answer you’ll have to wait for the video. Oh, lest I forget; the concept of reciprocal response was explicitly written out of the laws of war in the 1950s.
@KPW2137Күн бұрын
I might be wrong here, especially as I do not have the book at hand - but wasn't it the case in Guderian's memoir that on many pages he swore that NOBODY KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THE CAMPS, yet on one of the pages mentioned something about an officer who did something wrong and it was a reason for concerns as everyone knew it could land the guy in a camp?
@rick74242 күн бұрын
Doing the good work by debunking disinformation.
@Swedishmafia101MemeCorporationКүн бұрын
Thank you for addressing this.
@jasondouglas67552 күн бұрын
I feel like everyone must watch this video. The amount of people I have met on the internet who say that the Wehrmact was a brilliant fighting force. Or that the West should have joined the Germans in there fight against the Soviets is astounding and must be addressed.
@shawnr771Күн бұрын
Thank you for the lesson. Apparently you are only a criminal unless the government needs something from you.
@honker32822 күн бұрын
"A big boy did it and then he ran away. It wasn't me !"
@sophietucker1255Күн бұрын
Only the most naive would believe that only the SS were the bad guys. Sadly though there is more than enough blame to go around for everyone involved. One can and maybe should be asking is the factory worker building the tanks, bombers, bombs, bullets and artillery shells any less guilty. We must never forget that the histories are written by the victors not the defeated. The books by Guderian and Manstein are the exception not the rule
@lucasjleandro2 күн бұрын
"Oh Crap we need a German Army to shield us from USSR" Some Ally Analyst
@Jarod-vg9wqКүн бұрын
To be fair there fear is not unfounded and the German country will need an army eventually the Soviet Union did have real intentions are expanding Weston to Europe
@fabianustertius6460Күн бұрын
@@Jarod-vg9wq churchill was close to do operation untinkable, so.. the allies 100% would have been striking first.
@christopherconard2831Күн бұрын
But Russia is going to withdraw to their original borders and leave the other countries to choose their own government style and leadership, right? Stalin wouldn't lie.
@marcel-ifc17Күн бұрын
@@fabianustertius6460 Churchill was at least smart enough to listen to the planners who said that in 99 out of 100 times the end result would be absolute Soviet control of all of continental Europe.
@fabianustertius6460Күн бұрын
@@marcel-ifc17 Yes, because the soviet army had absolute superiority in every single way, specially numerically, They could have just steamrolled france, the u.s and english armies but weirdly stalin didn't do it, Somehow
@christopherholder9925Күн бұрын
This was a brilliant rebuttal to the revisionism often applied to the Wehrmacht.
@ggregd2 күн бұрын
Wow, you're still getting understated pushback and whataboutism even here in the comments.
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
We always do…
@tsarfield58352 күн бұрын
What do these nazi defendants gain from this is the real question? That state is long gone, its reputation forever tarnished, as it should be, and its sins clear as day. What do young kids today gain from defending nazi germany online? Is real knowledge that hard to gain nowadays, and in that case. Who's fault is it that these sorts of young people exist.
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
@ the real thing they’re defending are shared beliefs, most often antisemitic myths.
@bringerofword46442 күн бұрын
@@tsarfield5835 imo they get a sense of belonging despite their flaws. For the US we have a society that heavily incentivizes young men to look at these lies.
@bwarre28842 күн бұрын
@@tsarfield5835They belong to a part of society that gets more and more radicalised. Having their own (social) media and discrediting common knowledge as "MSM" (mainstream media, that supposedly has it's own political agenda) or as (left-wing) propaganda. And this battle for the "truth" is a political battle. Some people have lots to gain from these lies.
@vyacheslavazarenko3786Күн бұрын
Thank you for your work, to give a light on this moment in history for Western countries! Blame on them for 2 side politics Respect and love your channel!
@DanielsPolitics12 күн бұрын
At 18:25 it is worth spelling out that the war started when Hitler went in to Poland, having agreed with Stalin to carve it up. He had a pact with Stalin from before Poland up till he invaded the USSR. There was absolutely nothing defence in any way about the war.
@kindlingkingКүн бұрын
Carve it up? No, Stalin just returned all territories poles stole to their rightful owners (Belorussian SSR, Ukrainian SSR, Lithuania and Slovakia). Hitler actually had a pact with Poland as well, but the latter refused to comply and tried to pretend it was a great nation as well.
@평양시110 сағат бұрын
Ironic, Poland has signed a pact with Hitler years before Stalin did, and he never got himself dirty by meeting Hitler in person unlike Polish leaders, and there wasn't any agreement to carve up Poland, the Soviet troops have crossed the border after Polish government had already fled, and 12 days after Germans invaded Poland.
@평양시110 сағат бұрын
Ironic, Poland signed a pact with Hitler years before Soviets did, thinking to carve up USSR together.
@평양시110 сағат бұрын
No, war started when Munich agreement was signed, giving Germany Czechoslovakian territory with weapon plants that had a production output large enough to invade USSR, every third German cannon wss Czech made in ww2.
@enysuntra134710 сағат бұрын
As an officer trainee in the German Federal Defence, the "Clean Wehrmacht" was one of my key formative concepts. If you consider the Wehrmacht to be "clean", you are made doubly aware that even in a "clean" organisation, war crimes could be perpetrated, and even those in accordance with international humanitarian law paved the way for war criminals. It meant for me to be doubly aware that "cleanness" doesn't come granted, but you always have to be vigilant to "bad apples" who can either commit crimes nevertheless, or even use the clean facade to hide their crimes. While I am critical of the over-hyped Stauffenberg group, still Canaris, Hans Oster and a lot of other soldiers tried to keep "clean"; and IMO WW2 would have been much worse if they didn't at least try. History is not so much about what happened, but about how to frame it. After WW2, it was not la-Keitel or other criminals who were considered rôle models, but Canaris and the Stauffenberg group. An "unclean" organisation that isn't responsible or part of postwar history just doesn't stress the same responsibility than an organisation fundamentally "clean", but through its command structure still could be used for crimes against humanity. This IMO is better than a "Schlußstrich" and a new organisation, that then of course isn't responsible for anything that came before. Apart from that, after WW2, the vast majority of men had been part of the Wehrmacht.
@bd953822 күн бұрын
This video is so important. Thanks for making it
@spartacus-olsson2 күн бұрын
Thank you for watching
@TheHouseAlwaysWins20Күн бұрын
"History is written by the victors" my ass
@jeansanchez52092 күн бұрын
excellent video any person who still belives the german army was pure is ignorant and foolish
@madgavin7568Күн бұрын
That, or they have extreme political beliefs.
@alexamerling7917 сағат бұрын
Hitler's Army by Omar Bartov was the book that destroyed the Clean Wehrmacht myth for me.
@sliceemup27722 күн бұрын
Are there any recommended books or sources to learn more about the myth?
@WorldWarTwo2 күн бұрын
If you'd like to read some more you could check out "The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality" by Wolfram Wette, it was one of the sources for this video. Thank you for watching.
@gurufabbes1Күн бұрын
It may be hard to believe but although the Clean Wehrmacht Myth is universally discredited nowadays, it does to an extent live on even in Germany in the form of certain military magazines, still published on a monthly basis, though usually in niche right wing circles. I was surprised when I came across some being sold online. It's in this grey area where they aren't denying anything that is against the law, but just leave the bad details aside. They are colloquially referred to as "Landserhefte"
@Lockerus2 күн бұрын
This pretty much solidifies my views on Guderian - he was a far more proficient giant baby and scumbag than he was a tank commander.
@eastmeetswestpresents6923Күн бұрын
This does make for an interesting What If scenario given that the Myth came about because of the need for a Germany for the US and their allies to use against the Soviet Union - What if Halder died before being spirited away to the US? Would the Myth have been harder to spread and thus the Wehrmacht gets prosecuted more brutally or there's a longer time for the US to try and create a German army to counter the Soviets?
@juvandyКүн бұрын
The Clean Wehrmacht has a lot in common with The Lost Cause. In both cases, charismatic leaders were given far too much freedom to tell stories from their own perspectives, largely for political reasons, and with terrible consequences.
@smittyw8575Күн бұрын
It always amazes me that people as smart as Bertrand Russell is not immune to propaganda and fallacies
@arrrchdukemax81922 күн бұрын
I'm really glad I've watched that video. I have many friends from the Eastern Europe and ex-USSR and so many of em and especially the elder generation don't understand that "polite" and "tolerant" imagination of Wehrmaht in some kinda films and TVser.. like the scene in "Brothers in arms" with German general. And youtube videos where some Wehrmaht veterans in museums told some things in cold blood: "We tried to protect Germany and Europe from communism. We served our Heimat. We did what we think (not thought) right". That makes the elder generation of people especially of the exUSSR furious. Ah, "SS burned the cities, SS Killed the civilians. We were just following superior orders". But dan, there was the Great Order - "Generalplan Ost". One of the most severe and monstrous towards not only Jewish but Slavic civilians of the USSR. Germans fought absolutely different kind of war in the East unlike the Western Front and North Africa campaign. Just like Japanese imperial forces in China. The famous soviet astronaut Yuri Gagarin was almost got executed when german soldiers tried to hang him and his younger brother Boris on an apple tree using his scarf. He was 8-9years old boy.
@Canute_Күн бұрын
Any chance you'll cover generals and other military figures that went on to serve NATO and the West after the war such as Johannes Steinhoff? I'm really curious of how much they influenced the alliance.