@@Vtxyd_boxing higher attendence than anfeild mate
@JustJake09039 ай бұрын
@@IZ4DAYZ_ If you've ever been to Anfield to watch a match, which I have, you will realise how untrue your comment is 👍
@IZ4DAYZ_9 ай бұрын
@@JustJake0903 mate your stadium attendences are so low plus the crowd only makes noise when a goal goes in, there is no atmosphere and you can always hear the opposition fans in the lfc V city game all I hear was city chants until you guys scores your team is quiet
@AntLiv3YT9 ай бұрын
"It was rigged that handball was called" Also VAR: *clearly meets the handball requirement*😂
@tobygoss29189 ай бұрын
Bro this dude screwed up so many names 😂
@KittyOfBorg9 ай бұрын
Tottingham
@mckenzie_8g6129 ай бұрын
'virgin van dijk' xD
@sagahammer9 ай бұрын
Dude? DUDE?????
@beechnewbaan80479 ай бұрын
So didn't you heard V.E.R too 😂😂😂
@rigormortis98812 ай бұрын
Tunisha
@karlharvey48069 ай бұрын
That rodri handball still p!$$es me off even micah richards was calling it a clear handball, corruption at its fimest
@Kyrelel8 ай бұрын
It did not prevent a scoring opportunity or change of possession, so it's fine.
@Dunk19708 ай бұрын
@@Kyrelel Those are not the only criteria for handball. It was handball.
@faizalharoun39309 ай бұрын
It s no surprise the EPL ones involve Michael Oliver. One of the worst referees in EPL history. He tried to make the game about him rather than the football.
@andyparedes10226 ай бұрын
the ball was in but the player pushed the goalie in after he caught outside the goal line
@katlig46994 ай бұрын
@faizalharoun3930 Im here after Michael Olivers display for Man city 2 - 2 Arsenal 22 Sept 2024
@MzaidMz-e7p2 ай бұрын
Michael uae oliver
@ActiveArron14 күн бұрын
It’s got nothing to do with his incompetence when you see how much Man City paid him for friendlies
@MarvarianTTV9 ай бұрын
Bowen's disallowed goal vs Chelsea when he scraped the top of his boot over Mendy's arm when jumping over him is by far the worst I've seen when West Ham's involved.
@Enoch5049 ай бұрын
Agree and I am a Chelseafan
@georgechadwick12149 ай бұрын
You’re not wrong but also in West Ham vs chelsea soucek hand balled it and saved a shot which should’ve been a penalty
@MarvarianTTV9 ай бұрын
@@georgechadwick1214 A lot of poor decisions that game
@JoshAndJackReacts8 ай бұрын
Coyi ⚒️⚒️🫧🫧🫧
@stephenkay3048Ай бұрын
P Tierney is as bad as coot , new house in Wigan. Not, menstiond
@stubalmer38849 ай бұрын
I love it when he said the crowd were booing. No crowds during covid at West ham match
@achimsinn61899 ай бұрын
In Germany's Bundesliga there was a match where the ref took half of the halftimebreak to evaluate VAR, then had both teams enter the pitch mid halftimebreak to perform the penalty he gave after reviewing VAR and after that sent them back to continue the break. According ot experts this was within the rules as written, but at the same time everybody watching it just knew this was wrong.
@Uli_Krosse9 ай бұрын
That was Mainz vs Freiburg, I believe.
@HawKster_9 ай бұрын
So out off the dozen or so "Worst VAR Decisions" at least 3 were correct, makes it totally worth it.
@SirAntoniousBlock9 ай бұрын
Yeah, it was a penalty to Portugal and Griezeman was offside, Kane was booked so VAR could not intervene whereas the ref took no action for Christies lunge on Saka today.
@OboOboGaming20259 ай бұрын
@@SirAntoniousBlock also he was lost for words when jones rightfully got sent off also the west 5am vs chelsea game was a red
@SirAntoniousBlock9 ай бұрын
@@OboOboGaming2025 Yep studs up.
@pimeye8 ай бұрын
Even though there was an offside decision before Pickford took out Van Dyck, the referee could have booked/sent off Pickford or dangerous conduct and overruled VAR. Let's say Pickford had deliberately punched Van Dyck, do you think the ref would have done nothing because there was an offside decision?
@SirAntoniousBlock8 ай бұрын
@@pimeye True, the ref can make whatever decision he wants.
@Mandieaanokselssnuift9 ай бұрын
1:29 Bro said virgin van dijk
@Lfc-supporter3899 ай бұрын
💀
@giancarlotorres95969 ай бұрын
💀
@DJ.Creeper9 ай бұрын
The crowed booed The stadium:empty
@thomasjrgensen31659 ай бұрын
Its recorded sound playing on stadium speakers
@user-moja_crew2 ай бұрын
Corrupted ref and var..😂
@jessicamichael84126 ай бұрын
Griezman was obviously offsides😂😂😂
@tinhorsebrewery75064 ай бұрын
Looking for this comment hahaha
@ozgecko40509 ай бұрын
You are so biased 😂😂😂😂 you are so obviously a Liverpool fan 😂😂😂😂
@naaik-v8o9 ай бұрын
how is it biased..
@Lenboy45edits9 ай бұрын
U are right cuz the first one was also a mistake with the technology so biased😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
@Diazgoat79 ай бұрын
How these are obvious bad var discussions
@SatoCx3339 ай бұрын
Liverpool deserve to have more points this season. I don’t know any other team that is hated by refs. I’m a Brighton supporter btw
@Glitchthatguy9 ай бұрын
He is not biased is it just that Liverpool got robbed so many times 😢
@MrWasim202 ай бұрын
VAR has Destroyed the beauty of football
@paulodanga75829 ай бұрын
That balbuena stamp on chilwell deserved a redcard and var got it spot on
@Dunk19708 ай бұрын
Most pundits disagreed. If you've ever played, you know it is the unintentional effect of a natural kick of the ball. He's only looking at where the ball has gone throughout as well. It is unfortunate that Chillwell arrived too late to block the clearance, but in time to be in the way of the natural follow through.
@Safeen0909 ай бұрын
Now Liverpool cant win the Title because of stupid VAR Mistakes, truly shameful.
@Brandon-nq7ys9 ай бұрын
And they bottle every title race they're in😂😂
@comedyxz46279 ай бұрын
The editing was so on point great video
@Just_lucid_editsАй бұрын
4:20 obvious red card. He pretty much steps on the bag of his leg, clear as day red card
@connorfrost195Ай бұрын
Never a red, it is just a follow through from his kick. Looks bad because of where the foot ended up. Not dangerous, maybe a little painful but an accident. Common sense to not give a red there.
@Just_lucid_editsАй бұрын
@connorfrost195 studs up on the back of his leg? Super Painful and it is a booking at least
@connorfrost195Ай бұрын
@@Just_lucid_edits There was no intention to have studs landing on the back of the opposing players legs. Some times accidents happen in sport and players should not punished for what is just bad luck.
@Just_lucid_editsАй бұрын
@connorfrost195 unlucky or not, many refs would book them
@connorfrost195Ай бұрын
@@Just_lucid_edits and those refs would be wrong (especially if it is red)
@pkmeister99939 ай бұрын
Referee of 10 years now... I figured I'd make this comment to explain most of these calls, since people have a tendency to favor their opinions rather than the rules. Whoever wrote and approved the script for this really needs to learn the Laws Of The Game (LOTG) and also work on their wording. Also, I'd like to mention that I do not necessarily "agree" with the way the systems work but, in situations where rules exist for a sport, they must be upheld 100% of the way and I am simply explaining them. Some of these were good. Some were not. Let's touch on every call in this video and see which ones were correct and which were incorrect: 1. Robert Jones red. You showed the cleats on an almost straight-legged tackle catch Bissouma in the shin, with force. You can argue it's the ankle which receives some "leniency" from fans (why is beyond me). But the nature of this tackle is both reckless and dangerous. The force used was not negligible. No question about it being a red card. 2. Diaz offside goal. This is clearly an error. It was apologized publicly for. The audio for it was released. No matter who say sit, it's a true error. It was not "clear and obvious" but that does not matter for offsides in the EPL with their use of the lines (so saying it's "obvious" literally means nothing). 3. Pickford tackle on Virgil van Dijk. This one is a matter of understanding the LOTG. Pickford caught van Dijk. Correct. The player he "fouled" was offside, meaning the foul cannot be given. Correct. In that case, what is the red card supposed to be for? If the foul was given, it can be a no card, a yellow card for Unsporting Behavior, or a red card for Serious Foul Play. But with no foul given, the only argument to have is this is Violent Conduct. Here is the Violent Conduct wording: "Violent conduct is when a player uses or attempts to use excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball, or against a team-mate, team official, match official, spectator or any other person, regardless of whether contact is made. In addition, a player who, when not challenging for the ball, deliberately strikes an opponent or any other person on the head or face with the hand or arm, is guilty of violent conduct unless the force used was negligible." Because he DID challenge for the ball, Violent Conduct is rules out. No card can be given. Very simple. It is very unfortunately to see players get injured, regardless of how. But we do not change the rules subjectively or situationally. Also from the LOTG: "In situations where an offence is committed against a player in an offside position who is already playing or attempting to play the ball, or challenging an opponent for the ball, the offside offence is penalized as it has occurred before the foul challenge". 4. Rodri handball. This is a tough one to argue in either way. The review for a handball has to be "clear and obvious" from a replay. In football (soccer), the LOTG states: "For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit". There is a diagram online that shows that is not considered for handball is the part that is covered by the sleeve (on a short sleeve shirt). No videos or images that you showed the ball strike below the sleeve of Rodri and in fact, every single video and image show it making contact with the sleeve at least halfway. This is the definition of NOT clear and obvious handling. No handball. 5. Sheffield goal denied. Firstly, this should not be in the video as this has nothing to do with VAR. Yes, this was something that unfortunately occurred and camera angles were there to prove it should have been given. As you mentioned, there was a malfunction with the technology occurred. In the EPL, the use of Goal Line Technology is used, not VAR. They technically cannot intervene to change anything. The best that we can hope for is the Assistant Referee has a clear angle that allows them to call the goal (if they're even allowed to at this point in the EPL) and then play gets stopped to award the goal. I doubt this would happen though because the Goal Line Technology would've been initially used to "disprove" the AR's call. Ultimately, this is extremely unfortunate and I personally hope they can create a method of preventing this in the future. 6. Red card for Balbuena. Balbuena definitely did not mean to stamp onto the leg of Chilwell. Intention is not assessed by referees. We simply look at the facts. Was the a stamp onto the leg? Yes. Was is negligible force? According to the referees and honestly anyone who has a working set of eyes, that's a pretty hard step onto the leg. As I mentioned previously, we do not change the rules subjectively or situationally. It's a red card. 7. Iran penalty. This one I can agree with the protests about. The distance from the ball was very small. The player's arm was in what I personally think is a natural position. In today's world, that wouldn't be given as a penalty. I don't believe the 2018 LOTG rules had any different things stated about handball. Unless they deemed the arm to be in an unnatural position, this appears to be a blunder. 8. Mitoma penalty controversy. This one seems to be a blunder as well (see, I can admit when something seems wrong). Initially it looks like Hojbjerg had a possible touch on the ball. The angle from the players' front (if you watch the slightly longer clip) does not show a clear touch or lack of a touch on the ball. If you slow it down, it appears like there may have been a VERY SLIGHT touch, though I'll be honest that I don't believe there was. In this case, VAR is looking to disprove a no-penalty which would mean clear and obvious no touch by the defender. They couldn't, so the call will stand as is. Personally I believe that this should have been because I don't believe there was a touch by the defender but I also fall into that "subjectively or situationally" category. 9. Kane no red card. First off, do not use the word "intent". Players, fans, and officials cannot truly know intent and cannot base decisions on intent. Now, in terms of the tackle... it is definitely a high boot, studs up, fast and aggressive challenge. I can agree that this should be a red card. The minimal contact made may have saved him in this case but I do believe that in any logical situation, a player would rather avoid getting hit by that than to suffer a potential injury. 10. Estupinan offsides. The lines do not lie. Are they in the right place? That's up to your opinion but I do think they may have put the lines on the wrong defender. As long as they checked both defenders with the lines to determine who was further, they're justified. I believe this one was also addressed in some form publicly. In the end, a better angle would've helped a lot, though. 11. Handball penalty call against Newcastle. A deflection off the side of a player from such a close proximity, into the elbow of their arm in a natural position of the elbow, should not be called a handball. This one was a shocker. 12. Handball against Uruguay. I'm not sure why this was deemed "unnaturally" positioned. A player sliding will break their fall with their arm and I think the position of the arm is in a position that is being used for support and not for the intent of contacting the ball. 13. Griezmann offside. This is a little confusing but it is upheld with some simple wording and understanding. It's tricky though, I will admit. "A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched by a team-mate is only penalized on becoming involved in active play by gaining an advantage by playing the ball or interfering with an opponent by preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent's line of vision..." Was Griezmann obstructing the play in any of these ways? No. Did he gain an advantage from a play that occurred while he started in an offside position? Yes. Did the player deliberately play the ball? Well, the wording for what constitutes "deliberate play of the ball" includes "has control of the ball with the possibility of passing the ball to a team-mate, gaining possession of the ball, or clearing the ball". That means you have no pressure and you're playing a controlled play (with the exception that you try to play a controlled play and simply mishit it). The defender had pressure and had to act instinctively rather than deliberately, leading to his offside opponent getting an advantage on his non-deliberate play. Offsides should be awarded. --- Again, I'd say the wording needs to be very specific when talking about the LOTG since many arguments people put up these days get indirectly proven correct by their arguments themselves! I truly do hope that fans become more aware of various Laws and I also hope they become simpler to understand in the future!
@RhysRowlands-ve1tn9 ай бұрын
Holy, that was long but I will read it
@RhysRowlands-ve1tn9 ай бұрын
Are you a leauge manager?
@RhysRowlands-ve1tn9 ай бұрын
Reffere I meant
@pkmeister99939 ай бұрын
@@RhysRowlands-ve1tnI’ve been a referee for 10 and a half years. I have many skill levels of matches under my belt and have actually been fortunate enough to talk with many highly skilled officials throughout the time I’ve been officiating myself :)
@Jamalito1119 ай бұрын
@@pkmeister9993what leagues where you the referee of?
@Purplegames5278YT5 ай бұрын
You forgot Liverpool vs man city when doku kicked macallaster
@johnsteinmann31479 ай бұрын
I work in the Gambling Industry one of our key objectives is to be open and honest....VAR needs this the only way VAR could work is if we had live microphone from the VAR as it happens...open and honest
@SirAntoniousBlock9 ай бұрын
_"I work in the Gambling Industry"_ So it's mostly your fault then.....
@BR-qf3wqАй бұрын
VAR poor decisions, manager's should take their players off the pitch
@adelefairclough-kz4ik9 ай бұрын
I just noticed this guy has 263 subscribers I was expecting around 1.24M😮
@TOPBINSGOAL9 ай бұрын
He has 553
@cirkelshorts9 ай бұрын
942
@Sampiou-tp6kp9 ай бұрын
961
@thechamp329 ай бұрын
1.18k
@404notfound-z8q9 ай бұрын
1.36k
@JoseSilva-bg3uz9 ай бұрын
Wanna see bad VAR decisions just watch every wolfes games lol
@robphilpott436 ай бұрын
*Wolves (but I agree with your comment).
@alexmaier7536 ай бұрын
or any RB Leipzig CL game^^ Every single year the referees and the VAR make huge mistakes against Leipzig xD Correct goals are disallowed, fights/red worthy activities are ignored and will not be punished, offside lines are placed over the opponent's foot so that they are not offside etc etc etc but hey, CL referees generally don't seem to like German teams xD
@Karim-ek1rt9 ай бұрын
In the first one, the Diaz goal was actually a rob
@IZ4DAYZ_9 ай бұрын
Nobody cares liVARpool get all the decisions their way just because 1 goes against you does not make you special
@daniellageorgiou-norman22449 ай бұрын
like spurs have gotten robbed against liverpool in previous seasons? the jota high boot that wasn’t a red card? they get all the decisions normally but as soon as one decision doesn’t go their way all of a sudden it’s a big deal? 😂
@Dunk19708 ай бұрын
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Try counting them up agaIn. Liverpool and Wolves had by far the most wrong decisions against them this season and Man City almost never suffer bad decisions.
@IZ4DAYZ_8 ай бұрын
@@Dunk1970 go look at the statistics mate
@Dunk19708 ай бұрын
@@IZ4DAYZ_ I have. ESPN released a list of VAR mistakes admitted to by the Independent Key Match Incidents Panel through the season on 23rd May and Liverpool were adjudged to have had no VAR mistakes go for them and had 4 go against them. Oddly, they don't include Doku's karate kick which should have resulted in a penalty in the last minute of injury time against Man City. This being the opinion of pretty much every pundit. Even without counting the Doku, chest high, studs first challenge this was the highest net number of incorrect decisions against any club this season. Arsenal and Man City were balanced with the same number of decisions for and against them.
@rickgarcia31459 ай бұрын
I stopped watching after 40 seconds
@KCclouds9 ай бұрын
Same
@DimitriOnZolZA9 ай бұрын
Man says first tackle wasn't red that was a clear red hit on the ankle like that
@irons6666669 ай бұрын
I cracked on but you were right to stop
@1337score9 ай бұрын
@@DimitriOnZolZA you are stupid, he never said that.
@KonanTheBarbarian9 ай бұрын
@@DimitriOnZolZAok, ball played but whatever suits
@rwolves7 ай бұрын
Bloody hell, all of these and not 1 wolves incident. You could make a whole series about times we've been robbed by cheating officials.
@suehead1092 ай бұрын
Agree. Wolves by far have been the most wronged club in the PL when it comes to VAR, followed closely by Liverpool.
@KPRoof22 күн бұрын
If this happens now, imagine what happened during Pele's matches.
@naetochikwe3779 ай бұрын
0:27 from here, you could’ve seen he could’ve gotten to worse injuries from either twisting, spraining.. even worse. The dislocation or breaking of an ankle
@ArvondraPersaud9 ай бұрын
Cricket var are a 10 time better than football ⚽ var
@yobo_2579 ай бұрын
Bro I bet that even the var gets bored of watching the games 😂
@Duaabid79 ай бұрын
yes cricket for life ❤
@Duaabid79 ай бұрын
@@yobo_257bro I bet the football var gets even bored of watching the games
@yobo_2579 ай бұрын
@@Duaabid7 bro just copied my joke 💀
@Duaabid79 ай бұрын
@@yobo_257 nah I didn’t tho ur sport is ‘even boring’ wich means even more boring than our sport
@Topiaza_-en9by9 ай бұрын
there is one that happened in the chelsea vs mancity fa cup semi final game where grealish did a handball in the box and it was never counted which made chealsea lose the game
@LFCfan949 ай бұрын
Vid was two weeks ago game was yesterday
@Topiaza_-en9by9 ай бұрын
@@LFCfan94 yeah
@regaliz50379 ай бұрын
Never a penalty, natural position and didn't change the course of the ball
@thediddymen14089 ай бұрын
NO, it didn't make Chelsea lose the game. 90 mins of football made Chelsea lose the game.
@stefansteff77509 ай бұрын
@@thediddymen1408 plus chelsea would have lost anyway..its what they do best
@AaAa-uq5tp7 ай бұрын
That penalty against Uruguay was the most clear handball you could ever ask for. How in the world is that a wrong decision?
@MrDryVice9 ай бұрын
The only call I agree with is the one for Pickford not getting punished. The challenge occurred during a time where play should have been cancelled due to the offside.
@ArthurHouse9 ай бұрын
If the players is offside and gets fouled it doesn't matter its offside
@MrDryVice9 ай бұрын
@@ArthurHouse exactly
@AverageKopite9 ай бұрын
What? He still fouled him. If I throw a punch at an approaching attacker does it get ruled out just bc it is offside?
@MrDryVice9 ай бұрын
@@AverageKopite yeah but in situations of offside. The play after the call should have been made is not counted.
@MrDryVice9 ай бұрын
@@AverageKopite and there’s a difference between assaulting someone than committing a foul that shouldn’t have occurred.
@NotoriousK_I_T2 ай бұрын
The Villa keeper saved it. Greatest save in history
@trustezranimusiima7329 ай бұрын
How isn't the lampard disallowed world cup goal 2010 against Germany not here??
@Somerandomdude08159 ай бұрын
There was no VAR
@nmarks2 ай бұрын
Since this video was published, EPL referee David Coote has been show to be vehemently anti-Liverpool.
@SuperEthel2 ай бұрын
klopp was a cock to refs and went mad about everything...its human if someone screams and goes mad about everything the ref wont be your mate....bet klopp does not scream in a indian or chinese restaurants before he gets his food we all know what could happen...
@fariesings2 ай бұрын
Both Portugal games are perfectly fine. Handball from the header, handball from the nutmeg!!
@MysticAnimatesstuff5 ай бұрын
Finally someone who says football instead of soccer
@BrianBowles-n3sАй бұрын
Nothing has changed, you can add at least two more from Liverpool v Fulham yesterday 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
@MrFc-u9d6 ай бұрын
No way he said Kane’s tackle was “high” when he hit Robertson’s foot 😂😂😂😂
@darksero44339 ай бұрын
The griezmann offside is legit. the same happened 2 times in Germany. A rebound or a touch from the opponent players does not count as a new action if the situation does not change. The ball was a pass and it succeeded even with the opponent hitting it before making it an offside.
@DiggaDan9 ай бұрын
You lost me at Meeareside Derby
@baller_editZ18 ай бұрын
When was Ancelotti at Everton?
@mrduplex11038 ай бұрын
Do your research
@baller_editZ18 ай бұрын
@@mrduplex1103 k
@markymark4436 ай бұрын
Can someone explain to me why the Portugal vs Iran handball shouldn’t have been a penalty? It doesn’t matter if it was intentional or not, bro was flailing his arms around in an unnatural position which caused his arm to interfere with the ball’s trajectory in Portugal’s favour. If he had his arms at his side like you’re supposed to he wouldn’t have been able to hit the ball with his hand. To me that’s a very clearly warranted and legitimate penalty. I’m surprised they actually gave it since the refs usually try to favour the higher ranked teams and not the underdogs.
@JohnCollier-n1k8 ай бұрын
One happened yesterday. Newcastle v Brentford.
@MANCHESTERFORLIFE9 ай бұрын
the crowed booed THE STADIUM IS EMPTY
@tomasspanko17189 ай бұрын
Tottenham vs Liverpool never dissapoints😂
@tr-a-p-p9 ай бұрын
A liverpool and a CR7 fan,,,,for Portugal vs Iran that's a very clear handball 😂
@vipgamez63173 ай бұрын
1:45 Firstly, a red card cannot be given for a challenge on a player in control of the ball inside the penalty area. Red cards for mistimed, bad challenged only apply to fouls that lead to a free kick, not a penalty. Secondly, if Van Dijk was offside in the build, that means that basically anything that happened after (in the realms of ordinary play) cannot be taken into consideration. Edit 1: 2:45 The premier league has FAR less stringent rules on handballs than many other competitions. I.e. in the prem, a handball cannot be called if the ball was going to hit the player's torso anyway. This one in particular is also a rule in most other competitions though. Edit 2: 5:30 Doesn't matter if the handball is voluntary or not. If it changes the trajectory of the ball, it's a handball. UEFA is particulary harsh on handballs. Edit 3: 11:49 Do I even need to say anything about this? I don't think even Uruguayans believe that this wasn't a penalty. Edit 4: 13:08 That goal was disallowed for the foul, not for an offside. Might be time to hang up the boots after this disasterclass of a video mate, not to mention the 25 mispronounced names
@NazriBuang-w9v3 ай бұрын
Lies again? Gangbang Of Decisions Google Drive
@Justanotherandy639 ай бұрын
Hard to decide whether it is incompetence or dishonesty or both!
@michaeljones36948 ай бұрын
West Ham vs Chelsea sending off was correct I reckon. The WH player has deliberately followed through on Chiswell there. He knew what he was doing.
@Dracco289 ай бұрын
QATAR VS INDONESIA U23 THAT WAS CRAZY VAR NOT WORK.
@josiasroach56019 ай бұрын
The West Ham Red Card is a true red card. He is in control of his body and he has to take responsibility for his actions.
@OscarPlayzproАй бұрын
Was it a red/yellow/other or not let’s see 0:36 it was none card he tried to get the ball and the players make no contract 1:14 it was onside or was it if u look Botton left there 2 more lines and the Liverpools players hands are speard between both so that’s why it was offside I think 1:51 it was a red card + penalty the Everton goaies makes a rush to tackle van dijk then he tried for the ball so yeah 2:38 it’s no PENTALY I think I saw in the rules if it hits your shoulder it’s not a pen 3:37 I can’t tell 4:25 it was a yellow he tried to get the ball but the Chelsea player moves forward to the West Ham player 5:17 it was a hand ball should of been a penalty 6:22 PENTALY the foot made clear contract no doubt 7:44 clear red card 9:28 it’s clear offside the goal scorers hand was in the line 10:33 it was a pen the goal touched his fingers I might be wrong it might have hit the newcastle players shirt 11:35 it’s a hand ball just finks off his hand 13:09 idk it was a bit of both 14:06 u got 0 iq it didn’t hit it hand it was around his hip
@joshswain92889 ай бұрын
This should’ve been a Man City compilation
@IZ4DAYZ_9 ай бұрын
You mean a liVARpool one honestly we get every decision against us what you on about kid
@Beejayd1zL9 ай бұрын
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Yep. Its actually a table showing LIVERPOOL is one of the most effected by VAR not just this season alone but the last 3 seasons.
@IZ4DAYZ_9 ай бұрын
@@Beejayd1zL you got that incorrect mate
@Beejayd1zL9 ай бұрын
@@IZ4DAYZ_ Oh do you want me to bring out the facts and stats for ya mate? You seem to be very anti liverpool here? I dont even like Liverpool mate but im telling you now, they've copped more against them due to VAR than anyone.
@IZ4DAYZ_9 ай бұрын
You've definitely been influenced by the media to believe this media narrative haven't you, think for yourself
@MercyEnlightenmentАй бұрын
Many years ago, I emphasized that if football is a kind of match-fixing, investigation would take years to investigate. When VAR is implemented, and referee no longer the traditional referee, everything is being controlled. It is beyond our control, but it is rather out-of-control and/or under-control by FIFA. 🧘🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️🙏🏼🤲🏼
@IamYahyareacts9 ай бұрын
Manchester United fans are just reading the comments
@BOOGERBOY12 ай бұрын
How thar karate kick wasn't a pen i will never no
@karl_73.9 ай бұрын
The VAR decision against Newcastle was definitely normal and the ref just stole PSG. A foul on Hakim not sanctioned and the first handball just like this one not sanctioned as well, ref stole PSG's victory that day
@bremember8 ай бұрын
Crimes against humanity these decisions, we need to scrap it for next season.
@andrewlouden1202 ай бұрын
This is why I think 🤔 VAR is ruining football ⚽️
@EricusXIV9 ай бұрын
Ehm.. I agreed with many of these. Villa red card ✅ Van Dijk offside ✅ Cedric hand ball ✅
@SirAntoniousBlock9 ай бұрын
Portugal penalty ✅ Griezman offside ✅ Kane yellow carded (so VAR cannot get involved) ✅
@MercyEnlightenmentАй бұрын
I didn't watch it finish. Is the the Mane vs Ederson challenge? P.S: By right and fair play, Mane is outfield and open play, while Ederson dash out of the box. It is not consider a foul. 🧘🏻♂️🙇🏻♂️🙏🏼🤲🏼
@eliagasuleymanov17995 ай бұрын
Really scary 🚫🚫😱🤯
@iavor33778 ай бұрын
The penalties for Iran and Portgal (vs Uruguay) were corect decisions. Griezman`s offside was also correct.
@NoLGBTQNo-Israel28 күн бұрын
1:31 Bro really said Virgil DaN DjiK
@djfullynico7449 ай бұрын
That game with Newcastle versus PSG break my fucking heart I lost 24,000 because of that wrong decision😢🤦🏽♂️
@garethparry66733 ай бұрын
West Ham fans booed😂😂😂 when it was an empty stadium
@JustineLyngdoh6 ай бұрын
Mike Dean is a Tottenham fan's. 😂😂😂
@JacobCJ4108 ай бұрын
I honestly think city could punch players in the face and get a yellow card
@pimeye8 ай бұрын
If Sheff Utd's goal had correctly stood, then Villa would have been relegated that season.
@alanthron77859 ай бұрын
Rodri one was not handball, it didnt hit his hand or arm, the angle was bad, it hit much higher than a arm was.
@ShrodedGhost9 ай бұрын
alan, check your vision. clear handball
@alanthron77859 ай бұрын
It didnt hit his ARM, it hit the STUMP of his arm That is not handball, and it was not intenitonal and did nothing
@markymark4436 ай бұрын
Can add the England penalty against the Netherlands in the 2024 euro semifinals
@willchapman4716 ай бұрын
Chelsea are not called 'the blues', they're nicknamed the old ladies
@deeshm73199 ай бұрын
Blades v Villa wasn't a relegation scrap. Villa were struggling, but the Blades were closer to Europe than relegation that season
@kyabimeddy66968 ай бұрын
Liverpool v arsenal first leg this season
@SW-su6ou6 ай бұрын
A heated merry side derby? Whats that? Virgin van Dijk? Who's that?
@SVANEf8 ай бұрын
So sad, they don't have the Aston Villa - Chelsea game here. Where Chelsea scored in overtime, but VAR reruled it and disallowed the GOAL. the refs blowed for a foul 🤣
@nicho1658 ай бұрын
Michael Oliver what a surprise no penalty in Liverpool Derby.
@christianmuller2924 ай бұрын
As much as I was looking forward to VAR in football as much I hate it today. Too much is too much. If VAR was kept just for offside positions and penalty decisions I'd say fine but it's used for everything and therefore just takes the whole pleasure of watching a football game. I compare it to watching a movie on tv and having 15 commercial breaks. In some countries like the US or Japan I've seen VAR used so much that extra-time lasts almost 20 minutes. Yes they're killing football. Wouldn't be surprised to see adds during the VAR decisions. Why not ?
@lolmistro9 ай бұрын
Guy who knows nothing about football judges people who know everything about football
@GarethMclean-vb6px8 ай бұрын
So many var wrong against Liverpool this season we would of won the season
@Slizzyboi123Ай бұрын
Why does the ref hate brighton??
@delbybanny53852 ай бұрын
one of the worst VAR desicions is Faul on Alexis by Doku. ManCity would have no point!
@JustJake09039 ай бұрын
Football did NOT desperately need VAR. There were a few big mistakes over the times but there were far more enjoyable and fair games when VAR wasn't around.
@alangaming20035 ай бұрын
You will never never learn that Man City has 0 charges
@johnawalker92615 ай бұрын
The van Dyke incident was the correct call. Learn the laws of football.
@Arsenalfc9625 ай бұрын
Come back when you can spell van dijk
@smallqwaro8 ай бұрын
it's becoming fixed nowadays
@yvonnemerckel10029 ай бұрын
Most of the premier league refrees are biased
@marvinprudencio73219 ай бұрын
Today Lucas Vasquez looking for the contact to get the penalty and the VAR not overturning it or even going to the monitor.
@ChynWonder7 ай бұрын
What exactly is VER though?
@Adamcat92809 ай бұрын
Bro u deserve 700k subs
@OboOboGaming20259 ай бұрын
4:36 “Oh my bad I accidentally studded you in the knee” Doesn’t make it not a red Also at 5:30 I can accidentally leave my arm out and block a goal but it still is a handball
@collisking15422 ай бұрын
The goal for Sheffield against villa the morst ever
@HauntedTales2479 ай бұрын
Why do you keep calling it VER ??!
@gargantuk7 ай бұрын
Man's got pronunciation issues 😅😅😅😅
@JacobCJ4108 ай бұрын
how many Liverpool ones? it shows for itself
@Spiritual12262 ай бұрын
You missed two my friend that Liverpool didn’t get the penalty against man city and against arsenal Odegaurd hand ball and Doku karate kick
@markymark4436 ай бұрын
10:35 lol bro do you understand how handball works? I don’t care about the champions league but I can clearly see that was an elbow changing the trajectory of the ball in the defender’s favour. It’s an unfortunate way to lose the lead but the call was definitely fair and I don’t see how anyone can argue otherwise.
@barzun89 ай бұрын
1:21 MERRY SIDE DIERBIE 🗣🔥🔥🔥
@RANDOM-1k008 ай бұрын
Mersy side
@barzun88 ай бұрын
@@RANDOM-1k00 i know, im making fun of his pronounciation you fool