Worth it? - $50 vs $1000 Point and Shoot Film Camera

[@KingJvpes]

Can you guess which camera is A and which one is B? Comment down below!! 👇Also drop a like on this video if you enjoyed it :) Happy holidays everyone!

[@ilgattodivenezia]

At sunset, the difference in quality between A and B was huge. Otherwise, it was not so great.

[@ilgattodivenezia]

Blurry and underexposed pictures with A at sunset, very beautiful, sharp and well exposed pictures with B at sunset.

[@mochimochi572]

A: contax

[@kevinnava9897]

I liked a more before know what it is

[@leslietihor3692]

I preferred the canon too.

[@keshudioo]

I liked Canon's pictures much more. 😅

[@KingJvpes]

What is it you liked more?

[@keshudioo]

​@@KingJvpes they were generally darker and I felt I saw more details or better dynamic range in the shades.

[@tylerfukuda]

Canon lens coatings are better for me, that’s why they tend to lean a bit warmer than the Zeiss. I think the Canon is a banger of a camera…

[@theenky]

​@@KingJvpesits warmer tone

[@Suko120]

I felt the same with the golden gate bridge photos at the beginning. the canon just had much better contrast and somehow less haze/fog? idk but the sunset at the end had better dynamic range.

[@tomatheuz]

I am shocked 😂. I like Canon’s photos so much more. The tones, and the exposure, are so on point. You convinced me: I am trying to find one right now! Great video btw. Cheers from Brazil 🇧🇷

[@itsdmn1]

I thought A had better photos and colors, but at the end only in two cases the B photos won (10:33 & 12:18) so I guess it shines more in low light, but is the price difference really worth it in that case? No way😅

[@DezLec]

Yoo, the Canon’s pics were actually really good 😮 I think I definitely vibe with them more

[@darzee8423]

Yay! My Sureshot Max is gonna double in value now!!

[@blutch222]

Lmao I got one from my father-in-law for free, and I thought the same

[@ruiz1871]

Lol thats not the point of the video

[@PROVIIA]

@@ruiz1871 still gonna happen though haha. Eventually a new light is shined on another point & shoot that costs much cheaper than a Contax.

[@ruiz1871]

@@PROVIIA i mean thats not even the best canon point and shoot. I should buy the one i want before it gets hyped.

[@alexissalazarr]

@@ruiz1871 what is the best canon point and shoot?

[@marcustiga]

Canon was the winner here

[@alfabravo80]

Although I knew from the first couple of photos that, B was Contax because, it was a bit sharper than the Canon, none the less, in at least one comparison, at 9:43, the Canon appears to be the sharper camera. Also, the colour saturation from the Canon often made its pictures more appealing, especially for a place like California. Great video!

[@Sylvester414]

The difference I noticed was the exposure and the coatings on the contax glass. Saying that, some shots I preferred on the sure shot. Cool comparison.

[@Francois_L_7933]

I'm really surprised because all the way I thought camera B was the Canon. But like I always say: the Contax is 20 times more expensive than the Canon. But is it 20 times sharper? 20 times better at exposure (over the length of a roll)? That's essentially where the rubber hits the road. If I can find a camera that gets me 80% of the way to Contax quality without being 80% of the price, I'll be very happy.

[@aaronalbores3999]

There's something called "law of diminishing returns", and basically means that, in order to improve a product by small amounts, you have to spend increasingly more money. So no, it's not 20 times better. But there are so many more things to take into consideration when pricing those cameras

[@michaelhall859]

I liked the A better (for most shots), but knew the B was the T2 (sharpness etc).....that little Canon sure holds its own (especially for the price difference !!)

[@pawpaw324]

Great video. I also notice a difference in a small bit of flaring. I suspect that the lens coatings are different.

[@RicardoMartinez-yk6gy]

I found this Canon and a Olympus mju at a thrift store for 5 each!

[@jebeq2007]

The Zeiss lens always tends to have better contrast and colors so it was pretty easy to tell. As far as best bang for the Buck its going to be a Contax TVS. I picked one up this summer and was blown away by the results. It's very sharp and the colors are geat out of the Zeiss zoom on it. They go for $200-300 and it is very worth it.

[@IainHC1]

I was originally biased towards A for the T2 until I saw the sea photo's.... Then I knew it was camera B!! Cracking vid bud 🙂

[@kylehuntxr]

There is a bit of a difference in terms of exposure and sharpness but usually it’s not super significant if a difference to necessarily warrant the cost. I think where the price difference makes more sense is in the amount of manual control and features you get. That’s where it starts to add up, outside of the obvious like build materials etc.

[@lordgodalming]

I preferred colors and exposure of A in nearly every case. It was so open and shut that I was pretty shocked when the reveal came.

[@jimglenwright34]

As of the 11:25 mark I prefer A over B as it handled the highlights (more detail) and shadows better. It also had lower contrast, but that is my personal preference with color. So, surprised the A was the cheaper Canon.

[@b0ss__li]

Happy holiday season🎄✨

[@Rocking_J_Studio]

Merry Christmas JP! I figured out that camera B was the Contax because of the exposures. The sharpness was so similar between the two that it wasn't easy figuring it out. The giveaway to me was one composition of the GG Bridge and the clouds were much more sharp with camera B than camera A. Great comparison!

[@nitro3921]

Although the Contax obviously performed better my absolute favourite shot out of the whole suite is at 9:54 and the canon shot (A) beats contax's (B) by a country mile. The contrast is far better, focus seems better as it looks far sharper too and the colours also just seem more pleasing from the canon shot. Anwyays great video!

[@belema22]

I could tell T2 was camera B. Main reasons were differences in contrast, slightly sharper images, less of a magenta tiny. It does show though that you can make great images with cheaper gear! I loved all the images you took!

[@Cwbierwirth12]

I own a SureShot Max and totally thought it was camera B. I could only see the difference in the lower-light shots. The lower-light shots had more color fringing and appeared less sharp on camera B in my opinion. The bright, full-light day shots they were virtually indistinguishable. I haven't shot my SureShot Max in a while (I've been opting more for my Miju Zoom), but this video is making me re-think that decision! Thanks for the comparison, and thanks for sharing some GORGEOUS images of the Bay Area!

[@jackknifepete]

On my camera f3.5 is only a half stop from 2.8. Cam A seems to control flare better while cam B has better contrast. Cam B also seems a bit wider, and finally, the correct exposure doesn't always give the best photo.. Past that, it's all about user experience. Nicely done !

[@Grainyhalos]

At 7:10 you can clearly see the difference in image quality between the canon and the contax Also at the end a few pictures were out of focus:) Nice comparison

[@nigel8uk]

What most people don't realise is that most cheap cameras of the time, like the cannon would have had only three shutter speeds say 1/50 for low light and flash 1/125 for medium light and finally say 1/800 for harsh light. So that at f3.5 aperture would cover most situations incorporating the wide latitude colour negative iso 400 film. We're as the contax would have a stepless shutter speed from say 1 second to 1/1000s.😮 so if you tried same test with a slide film and the contax would win hands down. Just my thoughts, and great video thanks.

[@royrandell9755]

As an experienced photographer I cannot correctly choose between images on my iPad However on my Mac 27 inch there is a difference but I still cannot correctly choose the camera. Interesting video

[@Randy_51_]

I was leaning B the whole way. Fun and cool video!

[@Ulrich.Bierwisch]

I bought the Contax in the 90'th as second smaller camera in case I don't want to carry the big Nikon SLR. I was using exclusively slide film and wasn't convinced with the exposure and quality of point&shoot cameras. With a good projector, slides from the not so good lenses couldn't be used together with the SLR slides. They just looked like out of focus. Slides from the Contax where matching the quality of the SLR. I still have it but didn't used it for the last 20 years. I also saved a Jashica T4 from the garbage short before the end of analog era. This is much smaller, less expensive and also capable to match the SLR.

[@jesswilson3327]

The Canon seemed to lack sharpness/fine detail in most shots (especially when you zoomed in) but honestly it made up for it with the extra dynamic contrast and occasional flare to the photos, they had their own sort of personality which I liked a lot

[@PooMonkeyMan]

I kept having split likes as to which photos I favoured more which led to me second guessing myself. Like I really enjoyed the Golden Gate Bridge photo from the Canon and the oceanside view shot from the Contax, but some shots made me doubt the sharpness of the T2.

[@mortenthesbl5535]

Really enjoyed this comparison - truth is that most users will be fine with a cheaper version. And there are many good point and shoots out there. thx!

[@dominichelton]

That canon model was released in NA the day I was born. Found one at some kind of warehouse estate sale for $10. Love it.

[@likexritual]

I own both cameras. i’ve had my T2 for 12 years and my Sure Shot for around four. the Canon is undoubtably a sharp little camera but what it lacks in control and reliability is what you’d want a Contax T2. keep in mind. I paid $280 12 years ago for my T2 and it coined the “dumbest purchase you’ve ever made” by everyone around me, none the less the T2 popularity exploded but regardless of all that you’re able to take (almost) complete control of your settings and really make the photo you want to get. it’s always worth mentioning that the T2 is not a sure shot (no pun intended) hall pass. I found it to be a difficult camera to use until I was really able to dial it in, and although it can take direction it doesn’t always follow the rules. the AF on the Canon is snappy and you will make some great photos, but you’re basically handicapped with everything besides film speed. the question isn’t really what camera is better. but how each person uses it. I believe the T2 was $300 brand new when it premiered, so comparing it to the Canon on price point alone doesn’t make sense. to me and the scans i’ve received and the photos i’ve printed, the T2’s wow factor is in the sharpness of the lens and that’s pretty hard to tell over this video. all in all, find what works for you and a photo is only as good as it makes you feel: cool video!

[@n9iui]

I’m an old guy, and I’ve been accumulating cameras for YEARS. I really enjoy your content. I guessed correctly that camera B was the T2 because of the sharpness. It’s hard to beat a Zeiss lens! However, I found that I liked the exposure and color saturation better from the Canon; mainly the sunset views. I thought the T2 colors were washed out a bit. I live in the Midwest and envy your surroundings and variety of places to shoot. Where I am, one corn field looks pretty much like all the others!

[@trentc7329]

It's hard being a photographer when you live somewhere that's not beautiful or lively. I'm in the southeast. Pinetrees, no horizons, suburban homegenity, urban decay in the cities, dead small towns. Everything "historical" is an old church, cemetery, courthouse, or related to a civil rights crime. What I'd give for a little beach town with a little nightlife.

[@ruiz1871]

@@trentc7329you just gotta find your subject matter. One of my favorite docs of the last 5 years was filmed in the rural southeast, its called “hale county”. Its full of gorgeous shots.

[@Invincibleagent]

Could definitely tell that B was sharper. I did prefer the slight under exposure on A sometimes though, and the warmer tones are quite nice.

[@furqanriaz8224]

Cinematics on point love it ❤

[@franktatom1837]

We older photographers will tell you that the composition of both lenses is virtually the same, going back many years and they are a slight variation on the Zeiss Tessar lens, which is found on the Zeiss Ikon Contessa and other similar cameras from many years ago. That lens formula isn’t fast but it is very sharp and is suited to rangefinder flange distances, which P&S lenses use. In most P&S cameras of that era, the main difference in lenses was in the coatings on the lens. In fact, the "T Star" trademark for Contax lenses in their P&S line referred to the coating. The lenses in the Yashica P&S cameras were identical to the Contax P&S lenses except for the coating.

[@DirtRated]

The Canon had some flairs/haze that honestly add more character to the shots. That under exposed sunset photo might have been just the result of not being able to stop down to 2.8. I thought I'd notice a difference in sharpness, but I couldn't. Can you run some 100 ISO positive film through each? That will really test each camera's exposure and sharpness capabilities.

[@ThatSmallsGuy]

I’ve had both and have to agree I was enjoying the results of the Canon more. The things I hated about the Contax was how often it would miss focus, you can’t manually set the aperture to shoot at f2.8 and how small the viewfinder is. The viewfinder made the shooting experience suck for me. Maybe it’s just me and I need an eye test 😅 However the T2 does produce a unique look under certain light conditions. Great video dude

[@Hissatsu5]

I enjoyed the canon when at the coast and sunset the end of the video

[@NandR]

I bought my Canon Sure Shot Max for $5 last year. It is solid. No need for anything else on a point and shoot.

[@boesespferd]

I was hoping so much for B being the Canon. But still the Canon is the winner, you get a camera and a great holiday for the price of the Contax.

[@ashtongermain]

thats insane I definitely like the canon's photos more

[@jasonmckinney3730]

Had the Pentax 90WR and shot it next to my Rollei 35 and yes the difference was negligible.

[@mishnanua2038]

I guessed the Contax was B, but some images did throw me off, love your content, especially as I've just picked up a Canon Sureshot AF35M.

[@AardvarkAdventure]

The most surprising point and shoot I've ever used was the Canon Sure Shot M- very similar to the Max. Flash override is just a button on the side that you hold down, too, so you don't have to look at the camera.

[@BS-bc7gu]

I thought A was the Contax, fooled me! Going to order the Canon based on this, been looking for a relatively inexpensive film P&S. This is worth a shot!

B was clearly the Contax (Zeiss lens pairing very nicely with the Portra 400) with a wide range of softer colors

[@sallyvxn]

I really liked A more throughout the whole video except when you went near the ocean (which is when I liked how B turned out more with the water). I had a feeling B was contax, the main reason I didn't like B photos that much because the shadows didn't look deep and looked washed out.

[@jakeconnelly2441]

I picked up a Canon Autoboy 3 last year, and I've been super impressed. Was only about $60-70 when I got it, but looks like it's up to about $100 now. 38mm f2.8, just like the Contax. I think at $2-300 the Contax would be a great buy, but it just got hit with the popularity bomb and the price got nuts.

[@Linealo]

I liked camera A more personally, BUT in a few of the backlit situations and high contrast situations, the B cam seemed to expose more for the shadows and kept details. A also seemed warmer, "softer" (not super much less sharp, but blooming) and a bit hazier. After watching your conclusions, I think the observations were quite similar and I'd be happy to shoot either - except for the exposure compensation that I personally use a lot.

[@filmstockreel]

Watching and I feel and am pretty sure A is Canon Sureshot and B is the Contax T2 9:55

[@c0m-941]

I am guessing that B is the T2, the pictures were every so slightly sharper (but way less than I expected!) but the dead giveaway was at the end. The T2 clearly handled the dynamic golden hour lighting better than the cheap point and shoot.

[@gojira99]

Honestly, I wouldn’t spend too much on point and shoot cameras since they have too much fragile parts. I would recommend just going to surplus shops and junk shops for any deal below $10. I got my Olympus mju-ii’s for cheap, and even though one of them has already broke down (flex cable issue), I don’t feel any regret since it only costed me $4 and at least now I have spare parts for my other mju-ii’s.

[@lukepugh76]

Crazy. Camera A colors & style looked so much more rich. Only time I could tell was towards the end.

[@travishikeslakemi]

@12:18 there's something in the corner of the "B" shot, is that just water on the lens?

[@tomislavmiletic_]

1) Yep, B pictures where sharper. 2) B pictures where a bit more contrasty. 3) Camera A missed focus sometimes. So yeah, clearly A canon and B Contax. I'd personally go for contrast alone, but if that's not your concern, save your money...

[@scottnelle]

I preferred the higher contrast (which also translated as more sharpness to me) of Camera A almost across the board. Interesting how much more shadow detail Camera B had without totally blowing out the highlights. I wouldn't have thought that was possible using using the same film, but I guess that's a byproduct of the much higher contrast lens on Camera A. I wouldn't be unhappy to have either of these cameras, but I'm interested to to learn that the one I preferred more often was the much more affordable option!

[@juanmasaur]

You could tell B was the T2 just by center sharpness in some photos. Metering was overall better too.

[@juliereadsherbookshelf]

Shocked that I prefer the colour rendering on the Canon better.

[@_ChefBlue_]

Damn... first shots I liked camera A more also in the city. But at the coast I was absolutely on camera B side with the sun and exposure. I'm absolutely amazed by the comparison

[@Benjaminjohansson93]

im not gonna lie, I was really surprised by the revelation! I really thought A was the T2, especially in the beginning of the bridge from above and stuff, it seemed sharper and had more details, towards the end I was getting less certain. But still I kinda liked the canon shots more, warmer tones which I really like, and sometimes like I said seemed even sharper.

[@ORRmagedon]

I preferred the colour rendition of the A, I thought B was over exposing (something I’ve found with cheaper point and shoots). I got totally fooled. Although I preferred the canon shots overall (even the under exposed sunset shots) the contax will definitely give you denser negatives to work with when darkroom printing, which will offer you way more flexibility if that’s something you end up doing with your shots (as I do). I suppose the choice would come down to whether your goal is to make work printed in this way, in which case the Contax is the way to go, but if you’re going to exclusively edit/print your work digitally then you could definitely save the money and go with the Canon. I’m off to eBay now before that Canon price ramps up.

[@ziliu527]

It's easy to tell which is which. You may forgot 1,How fast is the focus. 2,The shutter speed. T2 focus is faster and 1/500th which allow ppl to do street photography.

[@the_wiki9408]

I think the majority of the differences here were exposure, and the Canon seems to have consistently had more accurate exposure, or at least a more pleasing balance. There were a couple shots where you could see the Zeiss coatings coming through like the flare on the Presidio theater shot. All in all, I would have been happy with either roll, but I think the Canon is giving a more consistent result.

[@manugeee]

I just recently sold my Nikon 35Ti, because I did not like the very long lag, when pressing the shutter and therefore don’t get a lot of good images, I liked. I have learned that expensive doesn’t mean that it is, what I necessarily want. 😮

[@zand]

While the Contax takes more time to get into in my experience it then should be used at its full potential thus not in basic auto mode. As you say, does not really make sense to compare it for layman point-and-shoot stuff. The rangefinder Contax T1 is more fun to use, have you tried? Nice video, cheers.

[@barclayjb]

I correctly picked the Contax. I do like those photos better. But honestly, the biggest difference would be emotionally in my head as I am taking the pictures, if I think I have an excellent camera, I will enjoy the shooting experience more. If I felt the Canon was giving me excellent (or totally acceptable) results, I would have equal enjoyment. The definition of quality isn't "the best", quality is really meeting purpose and expectations.

[@headwerkn]

I preferred more of the 'A' shots, honestly - contrasty, great colours. Any sharpness difference was pretty minor. The Contax seemed to err on overexposing some of the more high contrast scenes. I know that's a very popular look esp. with Portra 400 in the Californian sun (!) but whether I'd call it 'accurate' is another matter. Comes down to personal taste. Yes, better focussing and exposure control is what the T2 and other 'lux' P&Ss are all about, but for the price difference over a $20-$50 Canon, Minolta etc. it really makes no logical sense. Especially given their fragility and difficulty of repair. If you want a super compact point and shoot style camera with control, get an Olympus XA... yes it's a rangefinder, but the focussing range is so short you'll be zone focussing at 3m+ 80% of the time anyway. If you want real quality and the choice between full auto, full manual and everything in between in a pretty compact package, get a entry level 1990s Canon EOS (300, 3000 etc) and pair it with a 40mm f2.8 STM lens. The image IQ, AF performance, metering and viewfinder are far beyond anything the T2 or any other P&S can achieve... and you can replace the body 10x over should the electronics die. And if actual build quality and feel matter, get a late 70s/early 80s Nikon, which are infinitesimally more substantial than any plastic filled titanium shell.

[@Dan-C-71]

I guessed correctly, and for me the Contax pictures seemed brighter and I figured that was because it has a larger max aperture, and there were a few shots where the image quality was noticeable.

[@Firebert79TA]

7:11 in and I think A is the expensive and B is the inexpensive The exposure seems better on A, which the camera with more light gathering ability would have an advantage for options. The red in the sign at 7:11 is deeper and less orange for A than B. I assume the sign is in fact red and being processed better by the more expensive camera.

[@Firebert79TA]

at 8:38, the photo comparison has me questioning my assumptions. The "wicked" text seems overly vibrant in A, like a result of an auto-prioritization rather than a simple capture.

[@Firebert79TA]

12:22 - Now B seems to have the edge with the a crisper focus on the moving waves. This makes me think the premium camera with more light gathering might be B.

[@bobchuseby]

I guessed that B was the Contax, but i figured some of those images were overexposed with the Canon being more accurate.

[@alberthuynh]

I had a feeling B was the contax due to the sharpness. Another give away were the ocean shots where B was able to expose and focus properly.

[@KylerSteele]

T2 was so sharp but the canon photos had a feel to them

[@TheMik579]

I can definitely see a difference. But, the Canon did a fine job.

[@JehovaMagdalene]

You're doing a fantastic job! I have a quick question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?

[@outsidestuff5283]

I found it it changed from photo to photo which I liked more. I think it mostly depended on which one focused and exposed the best in each instance and neither were consistent. I guessed that A was the Contax so I guess there's really not much difference.

[@patrick8167-d2u]

The B lens is clearly sharper and has less flare than A. But A has pin point correct exposure and I think I prefer the canon shots

[@Unstuck5043]

Wow ok, I was not expect that. I definitely liked the Canon more. Contax (B) was sometimes really washed out. I definitely need to find the Canon somewhere 😅.

[@natanaelbenino498]

agree! I thought the B was Canon because some shots look washed, especially the foggy ones

[@snowchaos0585]

What gave it away i think was the exposure, from my own experience canon light meters either dont age very well or tend to underexpose often.

[@PROVIIA]

This is good, let me make some coffee.

[@Mettyunuabona_]

Sharpness and brightness is a dead give away

[@husshardan3511]

Checked on ebay, the first fifty or so Canons were broken. Also the Contax T2 is notorious for bricking, my repair tech (Deans camera repair in Torrance) said not to touch any of the high end p&s cameras like the Contaxes, Leica Miniluxes, Nikon 35ti, Fuji Klasse as they all are ticking time bombs ready to brick. He has a whole stack of dead ones in his shop. Better to spend $50 on a p&s that works almost as well that if it bricks, you are only out $50 vs $1000 when your Contax bricks.

[@theocwchannel]

Surprised indeed. I like the clarity of the canon. But also wondering for scapes if the f3.5 gave it just a little bit extra depth. Curious abt portraits tho. Haha. Cool vid.

[@jascrowell]

What film lab do you send your stuff to?

[@urionandon]

I feel like Contax overexposed some shots a bit. Maybe if brought to same exposure in post, Contax would be a clear winner, as it looks a bit sharper.

[@kevinlong2950]

Metering was the only thing that I saw as different between the two. At least after the youtube compression quality was 0% different

[@pdtech4524]

Holy Smoke! You just 10x the price of my Canon sureshot max, that I paid just £10 for!😊 I felt sure the Contax was 'A' because the colours and contrast were just slightly better on each comparison, plus I thought 'B' was consistently a little softer and washed out in terms of focus, so I assumed that was the Canon. I'm truly astonished, but I always thought the Canon was punching above its weight in terms of how cheap and plastic it felt to hold, compared to the images it produced So the moral of this tale is better, more expensive gear, doesn't always mean it will produce better images, and that is the exact mantra I follow.😊

[@Xenonic2]

I could tell the Contax vs the Canon up until the golden hour portion, particularly because of how warm the Canon lens is. Then again, I’ve shot the Canon SureShot Telemax before, for years 😅. I moved on to the Nikon L35AF Pikachi since then, but I do miss the adjustable focal length of my old Canon. Then again, the 2.8 lens speed is worth it.

[@Leandro_Montibeler]

Ok, I paused before the reveal. I consistently liked B more because it exposed a little bit brighter, just like I like it. That’s a preference though. I don’t see much difference in sharpness and very little color cast. I like A in a few of the golden gate pictures and at the movie theater.

[@shroudbigkok6511]

I liked the contrast of the canon but the contax seemed to expose and focus better

[@manusnake_]

I guessed right and key was sharpness. It doesn't justify a 950 dollars difference though!

[@imnotyourlawyer]

Paused at 7:08 and 7:51to make this comment. I am not sure I can tell which is better but it feels like the metering is slightly differently. At 7:08 and before it felt like B was ever so slightly off but at 7:51 (to me) B did the better job with exposure (but we are talking such minor differences you wouldn't notice without playing spot the difference). I think A, up to 7:51, is slightly sharper. However, I am again playing spot the difference and it only stands out to me on my gaming 4k ultrawide, when I through it on the secondary generic monitor I couldn't notice the difference if I tired. TL;DR guess I am might be shopping for that canon cause there is no way the difference is so big I could justify the price Edit: at 8:37 I think A is the cannon. I had a Contax T and that flare not look characteristic of my experience or maybe I am just talking nonsense

[@PluPerfective]

Preferred A but wasnt shock with the contrast and metering,

[@JackEstacio]

Definitely surprised. Made me want to get more out of my Yashica T2 rather than buy another one 😂

[@alberthuynh]

Another banger. Inspired me to dust off my T2 and get out and shoot.

[@AndrewWong-f5v]

The quality difference is obvious. Contax pictures are sharper and have better contrast. Much more pleasing to the eyes.

[@migsveephoto]

Assume that the T2 was on Aperture priority mode to make it “fair”?

[@MasticinaAkicta]

On youtube both were fine. KZbin always does compress the hell out of things so... they were fine.