Almost every American military industrial complex organizations describes themselves as non-profit organization
@tophatv29023 жыл бұрын
no lol
@victorli77373 жыл бұрын
@@tophatv2902 Yes, these "experts" receives fundings from DoD. Nice of them to throw that info in there tho
@dtango83453 жыл бұрын
Their just layer of protection for Cia to network a web for adjectives
@CHL419933 жыл бұрын
when a company just pay its CEO billions each year and leave nothing on the book, that company is non-profit. just like some mega churches.
@godzillamothra59833 жыл бұрын
American think thanks will also do the thinking for you so that you don't have to think anymore, convenient huh? The beauty of it, is that you don't even have to pay the think thank, the American military industrial complex and corporations take care of the bills for you, lovely huh
@dickiewongtk2 жыл бұрын
I love how the media is trying the best to drum up the Chinese “threat” while the experts are trying their best to downplay Chinese technology advancement.
@tankart36452 жыл бұрын
(You mean copy off stuff, that actully work worse.) By rallying up threat, the Military Industrial Complex can get more money, by getting more money for the Military itself.
@dddddh12 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/g16wZn6njqiSlc0 You seem wide awake.
@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore16262 жыл бұрын
@@tankart3645 congrats, you are now a certified MSM graduate.
@tankart36452 жыл бұрын
@@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626 MSM?, which MSM, you know how little that narrows the thing down?
@zenastronomy2 жыл бұрын
doublethink. 1984 Orwellian tactic
@MGZetta3 жыл бұрын
If a country's military equipment and technology are not used in combat, it is not a drag, it's a compliment.
@wanglaugh99323 жыл бұрын
You found the real information conveyed by this video.
@gallaxian3 жыл бұрын
The report says that China is gathering data about 200 drones it has sold to 16 countries. I’m sure China has also employed them in its border skirmishes with India.
@yungunit82993 жыл бұрын
@@gallaxian "Report says" if its written in English, Cannot be trusted. 99% chance its fake news.
@hotchi15663 жыл бұрын
For a good country, military equipment is used to avoid war. For a bad country, military equipment is used to make war.
@spaceisalie54513 жыл бұрын
Your right. No country should have ever stepped up and fought the nazis.
@clovertechdev42432 жыл бұрын
China doesn’t need to fly to Hawai’i, only to defend China sovereignty.
@ibrahimn223 жыл бұрын
When you money is not backed by gold but military power . Any other countries which are out of military reach will be cause for concern. China just wants to build enough military power to make any country think twice before they attack. China tec is getting better all the time and they are building up a nice group of countries to become allied with.
@georgecarlin20972 жыл бұрын
Not really. Iran is the only ally with any military projection capability. Maybe NK. Russia wouldnt likely have their back in an all out ww3 scenario but if they did recent events have displayed their weakness as well. Compare with US alliances which has NATO (Germany France UK etc.), Australia new Zealand Vietnam south Korea Japan Taiwan India etc.
@ibrahimn222 жыл бұрын
@@georgecarlin2097 Like is said the aim of the east is not to win ww3 but to prevent it from happening by making the cost too heigh For the western alliance. West is not defensive at all but a aggressive military economic alliance.
@georgecarlin20972 жыл бұрын
@@ibrahimn22 NATO is defensive only. Only the us had capabilities to project military capabilities over wide areas.
@DZ4772 жыл бұрын
"China just wants to build enough military power to make any country think twice before they attack." This is just an echo of China's state-run propaganda message, a look at Taiwan would yield a clearer picture.
@ibrahimn222 жыл бұрын
@@DZ477 Taiwan is part of China when the UK start accepting military supplies by China to Scotland or Northern Ireland Even the Falkland islands then I would say you have a point . I don't see China supply weapons to catatonia in Spain. When will the west understand Like Russia China is willing to pay a higher price to keep Taiwan allied or natural just like Ukraine. West is all talk and postures they will not step in on Ukraine and same will happen to Taiwan.
@chenzhang97152 жыл бұрын
There are only a handful of people in the comment area who have been to China, but they seem to know China very well😄
@Minchya2 жыл бұрын
Do you need to take heroin to know that it is bad ???
@余涛-f3f2 жыл бұрын
I'm Chinese, and China's weapons are toys and plagiarism, and there is no deterrent.
@Minchya2 жыл бұрын
@@余涛-f3f Interesting, do you have personal knowledge ? I watched a program recently that was about poor Chinese weapons sales, it seems that even though the price is good not many buyers are interested.
@ericwong4213 Жыл бұрын
@@Minchya which program? the one from CNN? The program that has access to top of the top Chinese secret in weapon sales? Everyone can make news out of fart. Just for your update, as per today's news, The Australian Strategic Policy Institute found China leading and dominate 37/44 critical future technology, majority in military tech, quantum tech, robotic, AI, while the other 7 is quickly catching up with US. The Hypersonic missile launched by China circled the World, shocking US with Pentagon scientists claimed Chinese nuclear capable missile defies physics. Back in Korea war, due to huge gap of military technology dominance on US side, Chinese casualty was 50 to 1 against US. Now with tech far dominance by China, the casualty will be 20:1 against US. Not to mention Chinese military personels 2x compared to US and all US allies combined (incl EU, Japan, S Korea). Pentagon from time to time warned the coming decade, the Chinese military simply unchallengable.
@Minchya Жыл бұрын
@@ericwong4213 You display the biggest weakness that all modern Chinese seem to suffer from , HUBRIS
@longlonglo35013 жыл бұрын
How arrogant and funny to talk about China threat when us and UK aircraft carriers are on China's doorstep...
@louiswu63002 жыл бұрын
US: 800 military bases out door. China : 1 military base out door. and China wanna build a new one for trade route. US: China is a threat.
@altego0162 жыл бұрын
It's arrogant and funny to talk about china threat when china is the one on other countries doorstep in the first place, like the Scarborough Shoal
@fuckdick36852 жыл бұрын
@@altego016 China is embarrassing itself
@岩兔-p1i2 жыл бұрын
2016 South China Sea is a good memory, and you can only pretend in the end.
@pi5tolpete989Ай бұрын
Philippines dont appreciate Chinese military disrupting their fishing boats or Taiwan wants be separate country
@danwelterweight41373 жыл бұрын
99% of the Chinese military is within the Chinese border. The US had over 800 military bases around the world with hundreds of thousands of soldiers outside it's territory, 300 of those bases encircling China.
@mashr47333 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Wikipedia
@troy42983 жыл бұрын
The PLA doesnt even have any experience any more, and the last time their troops were deployed was in tiananmen square 1989
@hagerawitube24493 жыл бұрын
Yet , it is the US who is worryed by Chinees Aggression ! like WTH ?
@troy42983 жыл бұрын
@@hagerawitube2449 because the chinese are the ones being agressive duh
@cheeseninja11153 жыл бұрын
@@hagerawitube2449 the US places bases in nations that ask for them to do so, the Chinese don't like the protection the US gives to its adversaries or lesser regional powers and has been pushing back. China is the aggressor as they are forcefully expanding while the US uses diplomacy and fear of Chinas aggression to gain even more military leverage in the region without threatening anyone out side of china *only* when China is agressive.
@wogelson3 жыл бұрын
0:54 oh yes the best stealth drone, the B-2
@hwg50393 жыл бұрын
WSJ just wants to imply that the Chinese drone copied the American design. However, the only similar thing between a reconnaissance drone and a long-range bomber is the flying wing configuration.
@oakoakoak22193 жыл бұрын
@@hwg5039 The comparison fail there. To say any aircraft with a flying wing configuration is a copy of US bomber is extremely narcissistic.
@elvita132823 жыл бұрын
It reminds me the Serb's air-defence IYWM🤡🇲🇾
@moutainchad23603 жыл бұрын
Yo so what do u expect the design to of a drone designed with the exact objective and capacities to appear like aesthetically, a bus with wings?
@Dwg2563 жыл бұрын
646
@marvinfok652 жыл бұрын
Chinese drones had been used in real combat in Libya. China sold their drones to UAE who send them to Libya fighting the opposite forces which deployed Turkey's Bayraktar TB2 drones.
@@ksc7957 😂😂😂where did you read them at chinese state television? Turkish drone technology is far superior than chinese. Today there are 3 countries with the highest drone technology. Usa turkey and israel
To know how great they are, there is a good example. DJI .
@defencebangladesh40682 жыл бұрын
yes
@alvirarahman26903 жыл бұрын
A valiant effort to highlight the use of drone technology in wars but NOT mentioning the most coveted of the Drone battle in mankind history: the Nagorno Karabakh war (2020)
@sai_full3 жыл бұрын
Turkish Baytaktar TB2 did a main role in that war
@YMe-hp7hi3 жыл бұрын
Tb2 is indeed battle proven
@TheMrgoodmanners3 жыл бұрын
lol turkey is really struggling getting parts for its drones nowadays, 90% of its parts are from europe and canada
@ismailHossain-ln9ln3 жыл бұрын
@@TheMrgoodmanners even now Canadaian company are crying cause they can't export their uav cameras. Now Türkei manufacturers and export this parts also.
@TheMrgoodmanners3 жыл бұрын
@@ismailHossain-ln9ln lol they are certainly not crying. The only one that is is turkey. L3 has far bigger customers than turkey. Lets see what happens when the EU blocks ukraine from selling its engine parts to turkey
@steevesdd3 жыл бұрын
Drone tech is disruptive. The recent conflict near Turkey demonstrated the disruption. The cost effectiveness , in procurement, maintenance, training, deployment and logistics mean that all conflicts going forward will be dominated by drone tech. For aircraft , removing the limitations of the pilot greatly increases the capabilities of a platform. A lot of weight, space and air craft specifications go into keeping the human alive. The same is true for submarines. Flying drones off ships reduces the need for huge flight decks and the number of personal to service aircraft. Deploying ships with 20 to 30 attack drones, could see fast attack carriers the size of frigates or no carrier ships and drones working from land bases that can be setup in hours.
@WellBattle63 жыл бұрын
There hasn’t been a conflict where the opposing forces have had anti-drone jamming technology yet, so we still don’t know whether they would be prevalent in contested airspace in a high intensity conflict yet.
@ChrischanCPUGoddess3 жыл бұрын
You don’t need ships to deploy these drones. They can launch from a soccer field anywhere in the world. Some are VTAL. When we looked at the numbers, shadow AVs alone can be anywhere in the world in 2 hours. Based off placement and handoff locations
@_OscarIvan3 жыл бұрын
@Eswe Agreed
@georgiebrowntown73163 жыл бұрын
@Sin ZX you must be chinese. Because noone else really sees it that way. Besides china... and actions speak louder than words. That all sounds good and looks good on paper
@rfcdgaf3 жыл бұрын
@Eswe The leek is a vegetable, a cultivar of Allium ampeloprasum, the broadleaf wild leek. The edible part of the plant is a bundle of leaf sheaths that is
@joshieepophide-hide33223 жыл бұрын
Swarm drones will be very effective to missile defense systems. It needs lots of missiles to destroy a group of swarm drones while it only need 1 drone to disrupt or destroy enemy missile defense installations that cost 1000x more than the swarm drones.
@saviobiogen99143 жыл бұрын
Yea, but those small drones are easier to be jamed, and are leas capable against radio electronic weapons and such measures.
@mdhasmatalimondal12163 жыл бұрын
A powerful EMP and your swarm is grounded .
@ChoongaLoonga3 жыл бұрын
And you fire c ram cannon and turno dose drones into junk
@sevrent28113 жыл бұрын
not really, guns that fire clouds of small projectiles can easily shoot down drone swarms. Rheinmetall already made one
@ChoongaLoonga3 жыл бұрын
@@sevrent2811 i mentioned it above you.Tungsten submunition is the solution to swarm drone probpem
@maxscania3 жыл бұрын
1:37 decrease the risk of human casualties, well it depends which human.
@elements11683 жыл бұрын
A malfunctioned fully automated swarm is really dangerous
@tonysu88603 жыл бұрын
Not necessarily. Find a quadcopter nano quadcopter competition in your area aometime and have a bunch of them fly their quadcopters into you. And maybe take control of one yourself. You'll find that "malfunctioning" or even poorly functioning quadcopters are more an amusement than any threat to your physical well being.
@smiley46693 жыл бұрын
@@tonysu8860 Okay "Tony Su"
@dznuts1233 жыл бұрын
Skynet 1.0? Sounds great
@Ahoooooooo3 жыл бұрын
Once the swarm has reached enemies, it their problem how dangerous they are 🤐
@ChandranPrema1232 жыл бұрын
Enemy Swarm in your AO
@stanoh10003 жыл бұрын
Why can't we have the Chinese themselves talk about their drones?? And products??
@AAA-pf5bh3 жыл бұрын
The defence ministry didn’t respond to a request for comment 5:28
@donchen49063 жыл бұрын
@iͥvͮaͣrͬoͦ Did good media make your country stronger?
@Ilovecruise3 жыл бұрын
@@donchen4906 if the media are not bias and objective, then yes
@donchen49063 жыл бұрын
@@Ilovecruise If? So it is not then. Don't put your hope on if, it is just an assumption that far from being reality
@k.k.c86703 жыл бұрын
@iͥvͮaͣrͬoͦ the aim of US public relations in regard to this is to make the military industrial complex look good... So that the US can sell more weapons and stuff. It is a major American export industry. China, not so much. It does export some weapons but it's clearly not as aggressive in that regard.
@birdangry50073 жыл бұрын
For industrial countries such as China and the United States, simply comparing military spending is meaningless because their domestic purchasing power is different.
@flabber55tv833 жыл бұрын
But high quality
@birdangry50073 жыл бұрын
@@flabber55tv83 Yes, quality is important. Americans with high-quality weapons spent $2.231 trillion in Afghanistan, fought for more than 10 years, and did not eliminate the backward Taliban. On the contrary, they finally let the Taliban establish a government. Can you tell me why?I hope you can think independently. At the same time, people are more important. This is the reason why China was able to drive the Americans into the sea in the 1950 Korean War when its weapons lagged far behind the United States. As a Chinese, it is fair to say that the United States is leading in many traditional military fields (such as military engines). But the gap is already small. We can see these gaps and narrow them. On the contrary, China has advantages in some emerging fields (such as hypersonic weapons, space shuttle aircraft, etc.). The most important thing is that time is on China's side.
@tis_ace3 жыл бұрын
@@birdangry5007 i can agree with most of what u said except for the shuttle part, us still operates the x 37 and has extensive knowledge from the space shuttle program, so givi g the advantage to china in that field just doesnt sit well with me
@flabber55tv833 жыл бұрын
And your saying china's drive the US?? In the ocean Big NO The UN was there to defend Korean border and guess what?? No one can go through in that front line and you saying time is now china's side sryly Did you think your country is unstoppable because you have hypersonic missile? And you think UN and NATO can stand a chance.?
@birdangry50073 жыл бұрын
@@tis_ace X 37 is not the same model as China's space shuttle. X 37 is a space shuttle that takes off vertically by rocket power. It glides and lands horizontally without power in the atmosphere. An aerospace plane can take off horizontally into space, and then land on the runway on its own power like an aircraft from space. The power system of the two is not a difficulty at all. For example, skyion, which uses a knife engine in Britain, is a combined power. Not to mention the separation technology of aircraft at hypersonic speed (Mach 25).
@dreykim3 жыл бұрын
Military version of: you can copy my homework, just don't make it obvious
@JC-ew9ze2 жыл бұрын
US has hundreds of models of UAVs, China has more than over 3000 models of UAVs. That is the fact based on the numbers!
@tommymikey53672 жыл бұрын
@M4g1T3cH Who did the Dji drone copy? India or America?
@JC-ew9ze2 жыл бұрын
@M4g1T3cH you can go to wikipedia page of unmaned drone. It going to take you at least 10 minutes!
@JC-ew9ze2 жыл бұрын
@M4g1T3cH based on your coment,you don't know anything about chinese manufacture and logistic at all. The reason iphone can only produce China and make sense and make money. One iphone need thousand of supply channels to assemble to one phone. China has the complete supply channel that can produce cheaply and allow US Apple to make insane profit. Same thing with unmanned drone. China has enough manpower and supply channel. In a long run, China win.
@wallingnaga65632 жыл бұрын
@Misc??? Same shape as predator drone doesn’t make it a PREDATOR drone !! Aerodynamics of a drone is the same and predator drone are very good aerodynamic design so it’s obviously other countries will follow suit , the same applies to F22/35 design too !! Indian Rustom-2 looks like a Predator drone too but it doesn’t mean India stole US drone design!! The Wheel argument is the best here , you can’t complain about someone who made a wheel saying it’s your idea !! People can’t have a Square wheel !
@agc3 жыл бұрын
The point that most viewers need to take home after watching this clip can be found at 0:38 "China's military spending is lower than the US"
@N0_F1le3 жыл бұрын
@David Moore *laugh in a much more corrupted China Goverment*
@FloofyMinari3 жыл бұрын
Chinese Private defense contractors are more beholden to the PRC than American contractors. The U.S also has a lot more regulation, higher labor costs, etc etc.
@lvjinbin283 жыл бұрын
@@N0_F1le China will be always more than corrupted as long as lobbying is illegal.
@N0_F1le3 жыл бұрын
@David Moore let me tell you china goverment love to lie about their military spending just look at the navy and the air assets they have tell me that the spending they given are just incorrect and the china goverment is even more corrupted as the goverment eat most of the money before it even went to the intended purpose and even then the company from the goverment that is tasked to do thing, do it and too take money for the spending
@definitelysimple89913 жыл бұрын
@@N0_F1le dude, keel lyng 🙃
@jasonyau3263 жыл бұрын
And this is why China actually created and deployed Beidou, their version of GPS 🤔😉🤨
@defencebangladesh40682 жыл бұрын
yep
@werw68083 жыл бұрын
DJI left the chat 😂
@weichenli25982 жыл бұрын
DJI: I'm just an ordinary technology company that makes civilian drones, so stop throwing grenades with drones.😂
@zhli42383 жыл бұрын
WSJ is trying to help the Pentagon getting more budget. It does need public helps on politics. China itself is helping too, holding large amount of US government debt, providing strategic material such as rare earth …
@steevesdd3 жыл бұрын
US narrative making China the enemy while also being their supply chain seems absurd. Spend money to protect your supply chain from China when China is your supply.
@ismailHossain-ln9ln3 жыл бұрын
right
@ikGREENY3 жыл бұрын
@@steevesdd Whatever we export to or import from China we make huge profit on, which means a lot more money for our military than them. We already have this tech developed but aren’t worried about perception of power like the beta male communist Chinese govt so we don’t tell all our secrets to the media and show all them in demonstrations. Quit looking at the surface level info you receive as the full picture.. cuz in reality you just sound dumb.
@benganchan14203 жыл бұрын
@@ikGREENY america’s debt trap as of 6 December 2021 is $28,000,000,000,000 with a huge outlay going into military spending . Blame successive incoming american governments for the past 2 decades . Politicians divide a people according to their agendas, and when the votes are counted , it results in a hung democracy , which is an unworkable government. Happened /happening in america , canada, germany ,india, malaysia ….
@rupturedtortoise.15423 жыл бұрын
Okay this is terrible research by WSJ. They said at the end that we don't have a drone in the US arsenal that is the flying wing design. In fact, we have multiple. The RQ-170, RQ-180, X-47B and whatever other classified drones. These have been in service or in active testing for years now. If you're gonna make videos about the U.S. Military get real experts.
@yewsingooi95733 жыл бұрын
Even DJI supply drone for US military. US have drones? Mehh
@misterniceguy79973 жыл бұрын
@@yewsingooi9573 US have many Hightech Drones that China Copy it
@misterniceguy79973 жыл бұрын
@@yewsingooi9573 China dont have own Design hahaha... China always Copying US Technology., look at the US and the Chinese Drones its the same., anyway the B-21 Stealth Bomber is coming and 6th Generation Unmanned Fighter Jets also coming., there is 2 Types of US 6th Generation Unmanned Stealth Fighter Jets from the US., lets see what can do the Chinese Copycat Drones., but for the US that is an Old Drones (MQ 9 Reaper)
@shengchen45533 жыл бұрын
@@misterniceguy7997 hightech and copy. Lolllllll. Do u mean USA High tech is so easy to copy. Or ONLY China is able to COPY USA HIGH TECH. Or USA is so USELESS to protect its HIGH-tech. Or China is too powerful to steal USA High tech from USA. We also deployed our own hypersonic missile. Same as Russia. That must be another steal….. Wait, The USA is still struggling testing and failed. OK, China steal it from the future. That make sense.
@tophatv29023 жыл бұрын
@@shengchen4553 You are coping hard. you could even make your own humvee without making a copy lol.
@JorgeHernandez-gq6yy3 жыл бұрын
I’m assuming a big factor is that here in the states we contract companies and China does not?
@dracoii11473 жыл бұрын
They aren’t allowed to give info to other countries but China usually hacks in
@proger19603 жыл бұрын
@@dracoii1147 Umm well you see they sometimes do secretly, or China uses an American ally like Israel and bribe them to take critical American tech away.
@emanuelbabayagaortiz73333 жыл бұрын
@@proger1960 it’s probably old military techs or former chief operators during manufacturing. After their contract they’ll run off and sell secrets. I’ve looked at job requirements to work for big defense industries. They basically ask for someone who is either a college study prodigy or some science teacher with a very fun hobby and budget. Someone who so versed from python to Java, c+. Electronics maintain eye and fluid mechanics degrees. 10+ in professional portfolios. Be formerly a tss/secret level holder… I still can’t figure out if they are offering a management position because the pay is like 100-1200k a year. You’re better off with all that experience running for President like Putin. But chances are that’s where the actual classwardare start between private citizens businessmen and those black suits chief security officers of the nsa/cia bakc operations command. There’s no over the net hack, you can’t send a file to overload someone’s network… you’d first have to be there, like opening a email… but not clicking the link or downloading the attachment first…. Think about this. Look at border patrol agent jobs or atf agent jobs. Those jobs you can’t sign up for, you’d have to work hard and hope they have a interest in your department. Even then you can still seem too greedy to want to help Uncle Sam. There’s a article that said the cia needs to stop hunting Chinese spies in academia. But China were the first to test quantum satellites in space and the US were studying photonics copying. Which I thought was impossible since you can take a element and copy it. Specially if it’s used to send a message on a quantum level. The things that keep me up at night….
@proger19603 жыл бұрын
@@emanuelbabayagaortiz7333 Honestly true , I mean both China and America do work together on their evil deeds however the media shows them against one another.
@emanuelbabayagaortiz73333 жыл бұрын
@@proger1960 google Alexandra Forsythe. She’s this cute red head who’s like 20 years old that got summer camp jobs are Nasa/Raytheon. She’s now a lead engineer at Intel. America is headed to the public side of technology just as China is moving to the military side of this international theater. We can better start learning mandarin
@DavidF33 жыл бұрын
I don't know why they a re comparing the GJ-11 to the B2 spirit. A much better comparison is the american RQ-170.
@saptarsimondal76533 жыл бұрын
The military-industrial complex now need more money! Lol :P
@KejriwalBhakt3 жыл бұрын
The best drones are build by DJI in China and not the Chinese military.
@politicalreal78133 жыл бұрын
False
@KejriwalBhakt3 жыл бұрын
@@politicalreal7813 And the truth is?
@joyzhou16043 жыл бұрын
Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!
@two02ful2 жыл бұрын
America can produces 100 drone monthly and China produces 1,000 drones of the same kind in a month on a normal production days. On the same time China are producing a wide variety of drones for different application.
@余涛-f3f2 жыл бұрын
I'm Chinese, and China's weapons are toys and plagiarism, and there is no deterrent.
@patatebanine4278 Жыл бұрын
Source of what you say. Where you find that USA (not America btw) produces 100 drone monthly and China 1000?
@hyuxion3 жыл бұрын
it would be interested to compare the cost effectiveness of both military industries, I am going to bet China is more cost effective than USA. USA has spent too much resources to maintain the existing system, and not enough to develop into future systems.
@victorwang79742 жыл бұрын
Their "large" budget is for maintaining overseas military bases
@wanglaugh99323 жыл бұрын
You may find some truth from this video. US: "Today, it flies a fleet of thousands of drones that are operated in countries including Iraq, Pakistan and Afganistan." China: "Chinese military spending is lower than the US. Chinese drones don't have as much battlefield experiences as the America-Made ones. Chinese military hasn't used their drones in a real warfare."
@dznuts1233 жыл бұрын
yet people ignore the real aggressor, which is the us
@rashidaquil52843 жыл бұрын
Why do unnecessary killing including native Americans... it is unjust and murder
@tonysu88603 жыл бұрын
Actually, China itself isn't known to have successfully used drones in warfare. A number of customer countries have tried to or actually flown drones, the most successful seem to be the ones that are very unsophisticated and tiny, little more than what you can buy form DJI. The military drones China has tried to sell so far have had major reliability problems, almost can't even successfully fly once and perform a mission of any type.
@xinyiquan6663 жыл бұрын
stop BS, chinese drones have been entensively used in middle east and africa warfare since 2000s, ignorent, they were sold in tens of thousands to those countries such as syria and iraq and saqid arab and egypt and lybia, they have been intensively used in wars espeically in syria war, and have highest success rate in warfare, they shot down lots of drones and other targets from USA and turkey, go search videos on youtube ,chinese drones used in middle east, US made drones are gabages...
@xinyiquan6663 жыл бұрын
@@tonysu8860 stop BS and making up stories, , Chinese drones is largest and most succcessful in world, chinese drones are sold in highest numbers in world, US drone has very few exports and no one wants to buy US drone, it is expensive and very unreliable, thats why US can not have any companies like chinese DJI that is world most advanced drone company and largest sellor of drones, US can not even make good civil drones , let alone military drones, US drones never had any successful mission and all crashed or shot down by countris such as iran or syria, it is junk, thats why china is NO1 drone seller both military and civil products.
@jetblack68503 жыл бұрын
The question should be how many woman and children have the US drone killed compare to China drones.
@winterthekid3 жыл бұрын
The lady talks about failures, like you know: killing an entire family of 10, including 7 children, in Kabul, August the 29 2021?
@Dimaz423 жыл бұрын
China could probably design better military tech if they have similar military budget with the US
@VoidSpace93 жыл бұрын
We do have similar budget, but you just don't know it yet...
@twinsrock153 жыл бұрын
Why does China need a bigger military budget when they just steal everything.
@nobody28743 жыл бұрын
@@twinsrock15 hahahahahha coming from the us aahahhahahahhaha You just made my day buddy
@joaopedroalbernaz3 жыл бұрын
@Dimaz You need to change "design" to "steal"
@Zov6313 жыл бұрын
@@twinsrock15 Do you really have any classified information to prove their “stealing” lol
@alparslankorkmaz29643 жыл бұрын
Nice video.
@LotteryPower3 жыл бұрын
30 years from now when bioweapon and ai is greatly improved and natural resource is in crisis, damage from war can be devastating
@Pfyzer3 жыл бұрын
if everyone played by the rule, then bioweapons wouldnt be an issue[HOPEFULLY].... automated killings machines however, that's another story..... cuz blackhat hackers will see this as an amazing once in a life time hunt
@TheWizardGamez3 жыл бұрын
wasnt the US navy testing a delta(stealthish) drone, but eventually just chose a conventional wing drone for their refueling mission, and wasnt it supposed to have anti-sub capabilities?
@skyejamss3 жыл бұрын
Mq-25?
@hoosteen15973 жыл бұрын
Yeah do you mean the rq180? That is a flying wing drone in development (or operational already). Idk why wsj chose to focus on like 2 Chinese drones when there are hundreds of new American drones in development rn but classified
@riz82k972 жыл бұрын
@@hoosteen1597 yes it’s the RQ-170 and it’s been operational since at least 2011 when it was captured by the Iranian military which is prob whr China got their design for their flying wing drone from
@willengel24583 жыл бұрын
the female analyst sounded like a drone.
@BeastOrGod3 жыл бұрын
"There's low risk of human casualties" *PROCEEDS TO DRONE STRIKE CHILDREN*
@bambamkitring66663 жыл бұрын
Interesting to see Western and Eastern competition.
@TheSecurityAgency3 жыл бұрын
Advancement in two different countries is not measurable only by the amount of investment but by the effectiveness of investment. US vs Chinese labor cost, logistic etc. as an example. Judging by the amount of domestic hostility (propaganda) in the US, China seems to be already on par with the US or will be on par sooner then expected.
@dracoii11473 жыл бұрын
No it isn’t for example usa made hypersonic drones in the 1970s while china is trying to make them rn
@zenpai59983 жыл бұрын
@@dracoii1147 some people just don’t understand how far advanced the US is to China and will remain given China has a lot of crisis’s developing
@cresengcianamagsino70432 жыл бұрын
@@zenpai5998 china has hypersonic missiles now while USA doesn't have one🤣🤣😜😝
@truthseeker78532 жыл бұрын
Us is 10 steps behind in technology compare to China.
@alexnaranjo44112 жыл бұрын
@@Boi123-f6y there a difference Japanese have better rails then China does that make Japan better there many factors but a bot like you wouldn’t understand
@hudavid32563 жыл бұрын
If the US can’t even win Vietnam, how can it win China with these?
@bruh53613 жыл бұрын
Literally comparing apples and bananas. PS: China also lost in Vietnam shortly after the US retreated.
@GeraldoluizAprendiz3 жыл бұрын
You can consider Korea and Afghanistan too. And no, US will not fight China in a military conflict. Despite all tough talk on both sides. China is not the usual target for america's military power (3rd world countries with no real military capacity) China is already to big to be enganged in a military conflict by anyone. And remenber that China has defeated US forces in a very important battle in the Korean War and thus keept the north Korea out of reach for Uncle SAM (China has made a movie about this recently and is a big hit in some countries of Asia). And China was a very poor country back on those days. Now it is different. Only if absolutly necessary a matter of life or death for the US we will see a direct confrontation and that does not include Taiwan. Let alone the fact that China is crucial partner for US economy like it or not and also for Europe and most countries in the world to be correct. China is not looking for a war either. They have a very clear strategy: to become the richest country in the world and a war is the last thing they need. No, no war in the horizon but the military indutrial complex is happy as never before.
@grassyvillain95493 жыл бұрын
@@bruh5361 no, China retreat very quickly after doing the danger. US should have done the same, but they stay there like a fool.
@grassyvillain95493 жыл бұрын
@@bruh5361 And also Vietnam never win, they pay a much Heavier price than US and China
@r3dpowel7963 жыл бұрын
@@bruh5361 nope china did not launch full scale invasion into vietnam it tries to annex small region of vietnam because of pol pot. but by that point the vietnamese army were ready for ambush.
@amirkhanbaloch83853 жыл бұрын
China's development and advanced technology have frightened the United States. The US military is now competing not only with Russia but also with China. Problems for the United States could be serious in the future.
@JigilJigil3 жыл бұрын
You have no idea what are you speaking about, they are still struggling to make reliable engine for their fighters, they are not even able to make an airliner after 3 decades of trying and spending 100s billions of dollars, their comac airliner is totally dependant on American and European companies and suppliers, and Russia is third world country at least 4 decades behind US in every aspect of military technologies, US made their 5th gen fighter 20 years ago and Russia still striving to do so, even Russian military technology was mocked by India for lacking any advanced capabilities.
@robinlindberg12312 жыл бұрын
US is certainly not competing with Russia. Have you not seen the Ukraine invasion?
@tmgblaster6453 Жыл бұрын
*_As an Indian 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳 Chinese product is better than USA product, it's real, CHINESE PRODUCT 85%, USA PRODUCT 15% ONLY_*
@yoriel4962 Жыл бұрын
😂 oh, please if it wasn’t for stealing data they would even be close…. Yet, there’s still way behind as some have stated. They can’t even build their own jet engines
@CCCC-rc9ic3 жыл бұрын
Y is WSJ so obsessed with China?
@troyt87713 жыл бұрын
0:38 Wow that seems very disproportionate to their GDP difference
@Rex-ww4cw3 жыл бұрын
China has always kept their military budget on 1% of their gdp until not long ago they decided to increase a little bit more
@arlenn7293 жыл бұрын
The author of this video sounds like an amateur on military equipment development process. “Reliability” is THE MOST IMPORTANT aspect for military equipments. It is well written in the requirement section of the document for every piece of equipment. Besides, we are still far from developing an AI that has self awareness so calm down.
@johnnyg64482 жыл бұрын
China lacks war experience, the US not only has the technology it also has the experience! Huge win by the US🇺🇸
@你看个锤子你看2 жыл бұрын
However, the United States cannot eliminate the Taliban guerrillas. Where is your so-called actual combat experience?😅😅😅
@Footman50392 жыл бұрын
US has the experience,may be you want to say US like war.
@johnnyg64482 жыл бұрын
@@Footman5039 yes we do 🇺🇸🇺🇸
@Footman50392 жыл бұрын
@@johnnyg6448 Yes you do. And kill 18 kids in Texas. Congratulations.
@paniniman6524 Жыл бұрын
The us has experience losing for sure.
@michaelesq.atpcfii.98623 жыл бұрын
Since when has "war" been about limiting human casualties?
@Beyonder1987 Жыл бұрын
The reasons drones have become a big thing is not many countries have a response to it. Ukraine have used millions of dollars worth of surface to air missiles to knock down a few thousand dollars worth of drone.
@mohaztv86023 жыл бұрын
When you just look at this you can't help but think humans are very creative in making killing weapons
@futurecorpse73303 жыл бұрын
Heard a quote one time don’t remember who said it but they said mice don’t build their own mouse traps
@leky13253 жыл бұрын
A knife could could be use to cut food or to kill, depends who's wielding it.
@weijin77762 жыл бұрын
In fact, an important reason why China is vigorously developing drones is that it lacks enough pilots. Unlike the United States, where there is a wide range of private aircraft, the Chinese do not have a similar history. So drones can help the Chinese get around this shortcoming. China's industrial capacity is relatively strong (industrial output equivalent to the United States + Germany + Japan), so a mass-produced drone, combined with China's developing artificial intelligence technology, would be an excellent overtaking.
@BS-vm5bt2 жыл бұрын
It depends on the future, the EU has been extremely de militarized for very long time with a extremely low military budget. Right now the EU re-arming again with the possibility of a EU army that can mass produce to a way larger extent then the US primary because it got double the population with similar gdp. The US is the only western military force that got a military budget over 2%. Japan, sk, EU are close to doubling its military spending this will impossible for china to overtake. The combined forces of the EU, US, Commonwealth, japan, south korea and taiwan. Maybe china might surpass the US in the future but I highly doubt china will surpass that combined force even with russia and iran. Russia mobilized all those nations after the invasion of ukrain. I hate this idiotic militarized world but that is what both the US and russia wanted so they can justify their 3% and higher gdp spending on the military.
@texasray52372 жыл бұрын
@@BS-vm5bt The US likes to flash that military budget/gdp ratio because it makes them look big and strong. But there is another ratio that is much more relevant and pertinent, and that is military budget / BoP (balance of payment) That ratio killed the USSR and it will kill the USA very soon.
@changchadchanamdong2668 Жыл бұрын
@@BS-vm5bt. Idiot m you talk like all of tthem well unite against china is a real ear. Lol
@MeanJackal Жыл бұрын
i have always thought about this. if china don't have enough pilots why not built more advanced combat drones and combine it with ai? it's much cheaper and safer than conventional fighter jets
@SerpentCommando Жыл бұрын
@@BS-vm5btNot much, China manpower outnumbered U.S and EU combined. Mass production might take a long time to establish in Europe, but it's easier im China where they have too many worker.
@edwardlaw7973 жыл бұрын
All I know is every drone on Amazon is made in China. Actually Amazon is pretty much made in China.
@DY-fy2jh3 жыл бұрын
So is every other retailer.
@pttyyjz82762 жыл бұрын
man we own DJI
@edwardlaw7972 жыл бұрын
@@pttyyjz8276 If we own DJI, then we shouldn't be limiting their sells in our military space. There is such a thing as "Google" to find out who owns DJI.
@pttyyjz82762 жыл бұрын
@@edwardlaw797 Bro I’m not ur side…
@straightblast5692 жыл бұрын
All u need is a disrupt frequency n u can jam most drones
@wollo63 жыл бұрын
that academic lady sounded painfully spergy
@afshanmanikpethe54692 жыл бұрын
Insane n valuable information
@TesserId3 жыл бұрын
So, some of these are going to be autonomous. Well, we know where that's heading.
@forgaoqiang3 жыл бұрын
The terminator
@alimurtaza63182 жыл бұрын
1:11 not anymore, pakistan has clearly declined US the permission to do those things on pakistani land or air space.
@aijazmir18313 жыл бұрын
well done china
@underscore20023 жыл бұрын
well done? for destroying the muslim population of uyghur?
@triggerost90233 жыл бұрын
@@underscore2002 Better than destroying countries in the middle east.
@poopdownthedrain38193 жыл бұрын
@@triggerost9023 both are equally terrible… tf are you on about?
@michealhamman38332 жыл бұрын
hmmm what why not show US drones
@strangelylookingperson3 жыл бұрын
Go China!
@terrywong78792 жыл бұрын
why is rand corporation always states non profit. people get paid well. rand is part of the military complex.
@amenboughanmi58193 жыл бұрын
Turkey is now challenging both of them China and the US with the advanced drone technology, the likes of Anka S, Aksungur, Bayraktar Tb2, Akinci and in the future the Mius and Goksungur supersonic stealth Drones
@为林双木2 жыл бұрын
In fact, if America turns off gps. Or China turns off Beidou satellite. Can Turkish drones find their targets?
@amenboughanmi58192 жыл бұрын
@@为林双木 yes they can find their target easily because they don't rely on American GPS system, Chinese Beidou or Russian Glonass because they operate on Gokturk SatCom GPS system and its a Turkish satellite navigation system So if you have done your research you wouldn't have asked this question. I think you don't know that Turkey is a also a leading nation in Satillite manufacturing, They even have a SAR Satellite, AESA Radar systems the Anka S, The Akinci and the Aksungur are all using Turkish Satcom.
@knuckletherapyserveothersf60922 жыл бұрын
I wonder where they got that technology from
@mrj4282 жыл бұрын
I guess you never done any scientific research. It is a big system that engineers need to learn theory first, and then do simulation and field test how it works, and then collect data, analyze data, and reset the experiment and try something new, and then repeat many times to get a good result. People say China is copy cat is basically stupid, especially at the stem sectors, because the most important thing is not the shape of something, it is the data and the knowledge behind it, if copy is simple, you can try to build your own factory and try to build a new computer. It requires a lot of research, study, and experiments. Of course, it saves time because you don’t need to invent a new theory. Just like you learn some thing, the idea and theory was already there, but how to make it into reality, it is not that easy and simply say you copied it.
@许涛-v7k2 жыл бұрын
I hope there won't be a war between China and the US. The US can drop its aggressive strategy and adapt to China's rise. The differences in underlying logic between the East and the West cause a lot of misunderstandings. China is an agricultural civilization and wants a peaceful environment and fair competition. Do not provoke us. The West is a pirate civilization and wants to plunder and colonize. Although the two cultures are difficult to understand,hope they try their best to live in peace without interfering with each other.
@robinlindberg12312 жыл бұрын
"China wants a peaceful environment." Like Uyghur muslims trying to live in peace?
@岩兔-p1i2 жыл бұрын
@@robinlindberg1231 It's like your media feeds you garbage, and you take it as the truth.
@岩兔-p1i2 жыл бұрын
@@robinlindberg1231 You clowns don't even dare to travel to Xinjiang and ask the locals.
@justinacioffi87402 жыл бұрын
Ready when you are !
@elnova88452 жыл бұрын
What real war experience are you talking about? What is the practical difference between blowing up an undefended Iraqi mud house and blowing up a target mud house in the Chinese desert? Except, there are people living in the house that was bombed by the United States.
@henryeghaghara93853 жыл бұрын
Imagine talking about drones and no mention of RQ180
@IllusiveDude3 жыл бұрын
right ?
@Frosty_3573 жыл бұрын
Why there is no photo or design reveal?
@joyzhou16043 жыл бұрын
Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!
@tykki-2 жыл бұрын
how about signals that confuses enemies' technologies? none was said about that.
@samuelfitzpatrick97393 жыл бұрын
Over the years we've seen that when it comes to military spending it's not so much about how much you spend bit what you spend it on.
@lowrezwater49332 жыл бұрын
You can't really use this against america because they spend so much and spend it so well.
@philflip19632 жыл бұрын
@@lowrezwater4933 You've gotta be kidding! 8 Trillion missing from the Pentagon budget?
@jacer56772 жыл бұрын
@@lowrezwater4933 indeed the money is spent so well. but USA is funding hundreds of military bases abroad while China does not. meaning it is very likely that the budget used for innovation may be very close to each other
@robinlindberg12312 жыл бұрын
@@philflip1963 Almost as if instead of showing off the latest tech to brag to the rest of the world, they keep it a secret.
@randomguy71752 жыл бұрын
American military spends on gender studies 😂
@WynnofThule Жыл бұрын
5:33 what is the name of this one?
@daudzaheer17706 ай бұрын
Ch6 UAV
@sahibal-shemeri54663 жыл бұрын
Military spending charts are so disingenuous. Doesn't show what each country gets for amount spent.
@johnl.77543 жыл бұрын
Exactly. The largest cost is personal in all areas of spending from soldiers to manufacturing the weapons. US personal might be better but not 4-5 times better which might be the salary difference.
@joyzhou16043 жыл бұрын
Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!
@barakaobombervsronaldraide30983 жыл бұрын
Does dji make military drones?
@TL-fe9si2 жыл бұрын
LOL, they'll be sanctioned before even thinking about it
@jonathans70893 жыл бұрын
"Explosion of creativity" Right
@MyWickedSmile3 жыл бұрын
Keep thinking that we Chinese people are unimaginative drones who can’t innovate. We would love your whole military to underestimate ours as well.
@compassroses3 жыл бұрын
@@MyWickedSmile Nah, we KNOW that the Chinese steal other nations' technological advances, and then add tweaks.
@bright58013 жыл бұрын
@@MyWickedSmile I believe that the Chinese people are very creative but they need to show it by coming up with different unique designs
@Dwg2563 жыл бұрын
646
@erickariuki68423 жыл бұрын
Taliban!!!
@michellemacasaol5733 жыл бұрын
Can area denial using directed energy stop drone swarm tactic? any opinion please
@jimmyshieh123 жыл бұрын
If the U.S military dominates the world, it's perfectly fine. If there is any other competitator, it raise concerns, lol
@mashr47333 жыл бұрын
It does raise concerns for the U.S. safety because those competitors are not US allies. U.S. don't talk about England/Australia/Germany (now)
@robinlindberg12312 жыл бұрын
Raises concerns when it's an authoritarian regime like China. But great work pumping those social credit scores!
@syoushiro18372 жыл бұрын
I like how they said this is domination when all they do is make some lower-quality copy of the US military equipment...
@justinzak50253 жыл бұрын
I would be interested in seeing how much of the defense budget is maintaining global infrastructure. Classic imperial overstreatch.
@gallaugal90993 жыл бұрын
Actually I’m pretty sure it’s a pretty large percentage lol
@hahagg76552 жыл бұрын
the losing country will pay for the reconstruction fee in the winnibg country LOL
@dmncm38873 жыл бұрын
Not trying to be a smartass but the drone shown in 0:52 belongs to the Department of Homeland Security not to the Dept of Defense.Yes the DoD uses same drones just c'mon don't put a picture of a DHS drone it's quite clear it doesn't belong to the military by the markings.(If u don't believe me literally Google Dept of Homeland Security UAVs you'll see the exactly same markings)
@seanjohnson28482 жыл бұрын
I just order DJI Avata
@amachuseyin3 жыл бұрын
You should look at Turkish Military Drones too.
@fucky8893 жыл бұрын
They don’t have the range
@JogBird3 жыл бұрын
@@fucky889 the range is fine, Turkey isnt waging war halfway across the world
@fucky8893 жыл бұрын
@@JogBird those drones made by turkey are only useful if fighting an adversary that doesn’t have drones or a proper Air Force.
@amachuseyin3 жыл бұрын
@@fucky889 no
@wasser56863 жыл бұрын
@@fucky889 turkish drones are effective. thats the key. they are cheap and they work. and they are battle proven already. chinese drones were also used in libya, but not as effective and way more expensive.
@喜欢发呆-r8y3 жыл бұрын
I hate comparison. If I have to compare, I can only say that the United States is a superpower. China is just a developing country. The United States is number one in the world.
@albertchu79262 жыл бұрын
At least Chinese drones don’t kills innocent people like US drones. A good example are Afghanistan wars, how many innocent people have they kills but not punish for their actions !!!
@animatedstory34602 жыл бұрын
40k + kills
@funbegins23713 жыл бұрын
is this a chinese channel or usa's? most of the news are concerning china on this channel
@winstonlai40632 жыл бұрын
china china china china china driving everyone crazy you will all end up in a mental institution so china needs no war
@superduper19173 жыл бұрын
Show us how we use Space Command to shoot down satellites please! Also updates on the X-Wing and Tie-Fighters under development. Long Live The Military Industrial Complex Dapra is my Daddy ;-)
@napalmholocaust90933 жыл бұрын
1,000 billion... 😂😂😂 You guys using That number in your spending chart is a sure sign of sophistication and superiority.
@robinlindberg12312 жыл бұрын
Using 1,000 followed by billion or million is common.
@shawnz33073 жыл бұрын
bummer, seems like staying peace is the most disadvantage for Chinese army in comparison.
@ZZZ25732 жыл бұрын
Non-profit means non-taxable
@sundhaug923 жыл бұрын
GJ-11 looks sorta similar to the RQ-170 except armed
@nesseihtgnay94193 жыл бұрын
Of course, china copys
@wanglaugh99323 жыл бұрын
Most of cars have four wheels and look the same.
@hellothere16563 жыл бұрын
@@nesseihtgnay9419 Everyone copies. Airbus a320 looks like a Boeing 737. A BMW and a Ford both have 4 wheels. What exactly is ur point? China wanted a stealth drone, so it made one with a flying wing design to make it as stealthy as possible. But because rq170 uses the same flying wing design, you call China GJ11 a "copy"... so is the b2 bomber a copy of Nazi Germany's Horten bomber?
@renatocea52983 жыл бұрын
Ang pangontra diyan sa swarm drones pasabugin sa gitna o gamitan ng steel net na parang nanghuhuling ng lamok o gamitan ng magnetic gun para magdikit at sumabog
@mrvgranfield3 жыл бұрын
she looks just like a real person amazing tech they need to get the smile right tho
@arthurlin51703 жыл бұрын
20th Century: Globalization will solve world hunger Globalization:
@NancynMark3 жыл бұрын
We're in hypersonic stealth rockets right now and we're improving better and better everyday And they're EMP proof!!!
@videre8884 Жыл бұрын
I thought I was seeing a comparison here, but what I'm shown here is clearly a Chinese drone advertisement.
@bidentrump84293 жыл бұрын
If the US is the number one, then the only country that can compete in drones production is China 🇨🇳. China has its own “GPS”, design and manufacture all drones in-house. Even if the quality is not on the top, the thought of facing 10,000 Chinese drones at one time in any battlefield is kinda scary. ☠️
@sinoroman3 жыл бұрын
true
@kagenlim52713 жыл бұрын
Ok and
@joyzhou16043 жыл бұрын
Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!
@sinoroman3 жыл бұрын
@@joyzhou1604 so, you’re an fg member now?
@alpha_centaurus53962 жыл бұрын
I really like love 😍 this channel
@91Mr_Chen3 жыл бұрын
摸着鹰酱过河😂😂😂
@ghostkilla2016 Жыл бұрын
4:25 RQ-180 X47b “Am I a joke to you?”
@aur-19983 жыл бұрын
So much money wasted on defence it could be used to make people's lives better
@aldrinmilespartosa15783 жыл бұрын
Stability and peace is a major factor of making the lives of many people better. The only way for stability and peace to remain in the hands of your state is you have to prepare for war. Like it or not, this is the reality we living in.
@aur-19983 жыл бұрын
@@aldrinmilespartosa1578 If only all countries agree on reducing defense budget things will get better. It should be like nuclear no test treaty like they had between usa and soviet union
@JigilJigil3 жыл бұрын
As long as malicious actors and regime such as China, Russia, North korea, Iran,.. exist in the world, money will be wasted on defence.
@joyzhou16043 жыл бұрын
Have you been to a show called: before? My best friend saw Shen Yun before pandemic, she told me this was the first time she was moved to tears in a stage live show, So finally, I went to see Shen Yun with my whole family two months ago, I cried also---, What a great show! Actually I hadn’t believed a dance show would touch her heart so deeply until I watched it in real: brave, hope, warm, encouragement, energy, responsibility---, it’s hard to describe how I benefit from this two-hour show, but one thing I am sure is I won’t be beaten down no matter how difficult in the future life, I will never give up!
@aldrinmilespartosa15783 жыл бұрын
@@aur-1998 Greedy men reducing their own power? Its good to be opportunistic but sadly that will never happen, if one state does that it will be replace by another immediately.