Your "走向" making things a bit too light. How? Prof. 许成钢 pointed "Social Consensus" building; then his mentioned Humanistic Enlightenment. (But he missed one in my view here.) These two are very much towards your "走向", dude. [料依] 你的「走向」讓事情變得有點太輕鬆了。如何?許成鋼教授指出「社會共識」建設;然後他提到了人文啟蒙。(但在我看來,他錯過了一個。) 這兩個非常接近你的“走向”,夥計。
No, obviously not (這樣的基因有沒有遺傳到你的身上). That was why 許先生 also pointed that Gene or Rooted flaw/gene can be mutated. eg. building societal consensus and enlightenment. In my view Cina's 20 years joining WTO was one of key huge factors and powerful enough for a societal base to build a new societal institutional.
Prof Shu Cen Gang made a brief case study style of explanation in order to demonstrate his own's theory, Societal Institutional Gene. Perhaps, in my view that people more or less need to turn focus less from Ideological in terms of better life improvement. [料依] 舒岑剛教授以簡短的案例研究方式進行了闡釋,以論證他自己的「社會制度基因」理論。 也許,在我看來,人們或多或少需要將注意力從意識形態轉移到更好的生活改善方面。
@gangliezhu795113 күн бұрын
政治要关心的是:谁的生活改善。这不是意识形态,而是权利分配的现实问题。
@lioicomestai370312 күн бұрын
@@gangliezhu7951 how you do power distribution based on what principles/theory/believes/views/ideas from ancient to contemporary, Aristo to to Maotakuto, you still couldn't see ideologies? You are not blind.