Proof that we were lied to about Remote ID for drones

[@ghettogardens1]

If a person flies a drone in the woods, without RID, and no one else is around, did that person actually fly a drone?

[@dev-debug]

Only if a tree heard it.

[@williamwilliams8145]

Schrodingers wood.

[@tenns]

oh look an sdcard I found laying there!

[@chopperharly]

I love your analogy

[@yngndrw.]

Yes, straight to jail!

[@vincentditizio8790]

People who fly illegally won't bother with remote id.

[@thedave7760]

Everything that is now illegal was once legal. As we progress eventually everything will be illegal unless you have the correct license, in fact we are almost there.

[@jpslaym0936]

The only people impacted by these regulations are law abiding citizens of course. They were the target all along werent they.

[@ryanward8039]

Then stop being law abiding.

[@tnxmatze]

who would have thought of that 🤣

[@rider8224]

I fly mine at home on my 20achers with an airport rite down the street and I dont have remote id and nothing has ever happened and I definitely don't plan on getting it im also building a big nitro plane to fly at home I dont go anywhere to fly but my house nobody is going to tell me I can't fly on my own property

[@jvdmeulen]

every normal thinking person should/could have seen this comming, thanks for reporting

[@cyanmizu]

RemoteID exposed that the FAA has no idea what is in the sky unless there is hardware that tells them. Now any foreign actor knows just not to use remoteID and can be tracked. Good work FAA.

[@ravenbarsrepairs5594]

That's how it's always been. In war, it's safe to assume that any airborne threat without an IFF transponder is the enemy. Not so in the civilian world.

[@16-BITFPV]

Common sense, how would anything be tracked without hardware?

[@foldionepapyrus3441]

@@16-BITFPV You'd think at least around sensitive areas active radar, LIDAR, RF control signal sniffing, and possibly Visual and Acoustic detection systems (even if that is just people with binocular) would be in use. Actually easy enough to detect and track even the small drone if you are looking (especially at the altitudes xjet is talking about. As the hard part is verifying it isn't a perfectly natural feather covered bird at altitude, close to the ground there is so much more noise in the signals its trickier... So if you do a RemoteID concept right its really not more than a transponder that means the folks on the ground and those you are sharing the airspace with know who you are, where you are etc to avoid accident - anything that isn't broadcasting a 'I'm XYZ, I'm your freind' signal is likely hostile and should be investigated or just destroyed...

[@Roman_4x5]

Actually it is not FAA's job to know "what is in the sky".

[@interstellarsurfer]

​@@ravenbarsrepairs5594It's not safe to make such assumptions in wartime, either.

[@BlairAir]

Rules are made for honest people.

[@ghettorecording2925]

oldguyFPV; Rules are made to "control" honest people!

[@ryanward8039]

Then stop being honest. Simple solution.

[@deadwingdomain]

Rules are made to keep people honest.

[@BlairAir]

@@deadwingdomain Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters: Albert Einstein

[@E2Moto]

Rules are also made to break only good people.

[@MrPir84free]

Remote ID was an effort to close down the consumer side of drones; it's not meant to do anything otherwise; just allow big businesses to have unfettered access to the skies. Anything else is incidental. With any failure, it's just going to result in the powers that be suggesting that they need to go further with more restrictions on consumer drones.

[@TheBoatPirate]

sounds exactly like gun control

[@TheBoatPirate]

watch these douchebags start trying to play atf and classify drones as weapons.

[@jpslaym0936]

@@TheBoatPirate Made me consider a potential drone false flag casualty event occurring in the future in order to push draconian regs through. I hope Im wrong. Did you know Adam Lana's Mother worked for DARPA? That almost all the parents who supposedly lost children at Sandy Hook had their mortgages fully paid off over 18 months prior to the school shooting event on Christmas day morning? Never would have dreamt that but the county real estate documentation is in black and white. Rabbit hole turns into a cavern once anyone start looking at many of these events

[@magiofthoth]

Screw you for wanting a hobby/learn a skill/just have fun, amazon needs to deliver cat food to the stay at home dog mom. Please install a 150$ tracker to do 1/2 of what a software could do on a free/paid app the FAA made to track your radio output to receive telemetry data, but that wouldn't make the faa money while taking Amazon's green sea

[@djwak59]

I’m so glad you’ve got the balls to tell it like it is. On some other sites, it’s blasphemy to even utter under your breath, a dislike for RID. Another one is “needing” a spotter while flying FPV while you’re flying through hoops in the middle of a soccer field early in the morning. C’mon !

[@airadaimagery692]

I was lied to?!! Nah... there must be some mistake... Pffst.. Thanks Bruce. We love you.

[@FPVwineUK]

Drones are "weapons of mass destruction". Where have we heard that lie before...

[@crystalclearwindowcleaning3458]

Thank you for bringing us up-to-date on the lack of success with remote ID. I've missed your regular flying videos

[@peterpatten5043]

Good to see you again brother, long time no see : )

[@robertgiordano3452]

I agree with you 100% brother which a big waste of time. They should just let people flying have some good clean fun. I refuse to use rid

[@jamesmason7124]

The biggest problem with RID is that it shows the location of pilots, think about it, you are flying with your goggles on and someone comes up from behind and hits you on the head and takes off with all of your stuff.

[@ij2750]

I agree.

[@gsrsin]

When wearing goggles, you're required to have a spotter.

[@ij2750]

@@gsrsin So you and the spotter both get knocked in the back of the head.

[@Todd_G_FPV]

Don't worry, it has remote ID, u can just go get it back lol

[@Marlfox37]

This literally sounded like a cartoon skit lol

[@dolphstarwind1183]

I'm just lucky my 5in freestyle quadcopter is sub250g >.> Never stop the RC!

[@ghettorecording2925]

oldguyFPV; I was flying in a remote spot today, and had no ID where I was! Can you imagine that?

[@ghettogardens1]

I have two sub250 quads that fly like a 7"! Flyin free baby!!

[@bobbysenterprises3220]

Congrats. This popped up on my main google app feed. Your big time now

[@kr6dr]

I sure miss seeing you guys flying model airplanes at the airport.

[@xjet]

Me too.

[@olsonspeed]

"They make things up" Yes; THEY do.

[@Kleinage]

Bruce, I didn’t realize your home was also heavily regulated. Thank you for advocating for us USA fliers.

[@xjet]

Can't (legally) fly a whoop around the house :/

[@stevendegiorgio3143]

Bruce,I knew this would happen.I never complyed in the first place.I dont have any modules or FAA registration numbers.All I did was take the FREE Trust test and got my certificate.I havent even flown much this year at all.

[@dennislawrence6352]

Bravo Bravo , well said. Keep up the good work!!

[@thesavagekiwi3492]

OMG, I must give up even more of my personal freedom in order to keep the kids safe! ... oh wait, maybe no. I was listening and you are right and have always been. Keep up the good work Bruce.

[@MCsCreations]

I don't know if aliens visit us, Bruce... But, if they do, I'm sure as heck they won't use remote ID! Anyway, stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊

[@hotheadedfilmshhf6734]

@@NahBahDee truckin what😂😂

[@jpslaym0936]

@@NahBahDee 99% will laugh, but if they only knew what has been going on not so much. Where the millions of children disappear to year after year

[@WesternAustraliaNowAndThen]

BREAK THE RULES! I do it every time I fly (but only the stupid rules.)

[@jpslaym0936]

I had a male “Karen” who thought they knew about drone regs try to call me out on my 4 inch FPV quad weight. I said yeah its under 250g. Mr Karen said no way it is. I said wheres your calibrated scale? Same answer to any cops with that question. Ill be long gone if they show up with digital scale

[@semadragun]

Yep knew it was a load of BS from the get go. Go out and fly Bruce!

[@M-H433]

No you didnt

[@WHEATSFPV]

X-jet was right ? RID is a scam ?? The federal government squeezing money out of its citizens ?? Now who would've ever guessed this twist in the plot !! 😂🎉 ❤ love you dad

[@Wind_Rapport]

I wish the FAA was just XJET

[@knoxieman]

If they were at 40,000 feet they likely weren't commercial drones

[@BeetleBeetleY]

Hey Bruce! great to see you again!

[@fallenangels686]

Man, you did so much for the hobby. Keep up the good job and I hope you can do videos explaining the FPV and other stuff for us for me. You are the God of the FPV technology, and how things work , for that thank you so much

[@billlowe6995]

Reminds me of back in the day when CB radios in cars and trucks became a hot thing. FCC rules said you needed a license...but there were simply so many CBs out there that enforcement of the rule was virtually non-existent. Tons of people were using the things and virtually nobody got arrested.

[@CNCmachiningisfun]

Folks claim that I don't respect authority, when in reality, I don't respect idiots in positions of power!

[@chansachipampata5942]

In South Africa too, all drones under 7kgs fall under the same band. There’s no sub 250g classification

[@adrenalinelife945]

Good to see you back… I live close to Luke Air Force base…I fly my FPV drone (legally) under/bear the restricted airspace.

[@dogswhistlesharam9029]

Hey Bruce, have you seen the U.K. news? Not only do we have to register our drones (for some time now) We now have to register chickens , not just farmers , that includes if you have pet chickens, yup ever single chicken individually. The U.K. has gone mad, I’m registering some rocks tonight as chickens, if they want to check I will just claim I’m insane, 🤔🤣🤣🤣🤯🤯🤯🤪

[@FPVwineUK]

People don't realise, but this is the slow escalation into Big Brother state. This includes monitoring our vehicles through 'climate change clean air zones'. These people that rule us currently can't make do with just taxing us to death, they want to see when we eat, poo and raise chickens. Sadly.

[@mojoneko8303]

Just tell them your rocks "Identify" as chickens. 🙂

[@treelineresearch3387]

Don't forget TV loicenses!

[@razorblade7108]

Just register all government officials responsible for this as chickens

[@dogswhistlesharam9029]

In Britain from Tuesday 1st October it will be a criminal offence to keep a chicken without registering it with the authorities. So.... Everyone Register that you have a chicken. Overload the system. If everyone has a chicken registered how will they check? I've just registered mine I'll tell them it died next week, if you have one in the freezer register that, especially if you have a pet budgie or parrot that identifies as a chicken... even the cat or dog can qualify, if you have a mental illness, you could have an imaginary chicken friend pet….🤔😳

[@NoahJohnson7452]

wow i would have never seen that coming......

[@JamesCopeland-i1j]

We had several fly over my property in Southwest Virginia recently.

[@VintageSlots]

Actually, First Responders are using RID receivers to detect drones flying in the TFR's that are in the hurricane Helene area. They are able to find people flying in the TFR and contact the pilot to get the drone on the ground so first responder helicopters can look for survivors and deliver supplies.

[@VintageSlots]

Name a DJI drone that can fly 40K feet above the ground.

[@zira_fluff4105]

I agree the goal is to clear the skies. These violating drones in the USA reported by using RID will mean the gov't will double down on RID. Just wait for RID 2.0 where the RID module MUST comply will being able to receive and MUST be connected to the flight controller. In Canada, sub250 is still safe for recreational and commercial use. No license or registration required, but I can't see Transport Canada leaving sub250 alone as they eventually cave in to commercial interests and the need to create rules to justify there positions and copy the rules of the FAA.

[@collinmccallum]

another well presented and informative video

[@JoshuaKA02]

I hope you find some aerial footage soon. I’m curious about the jet fighters spotting drones, so you’ve for sure given me homework. I don’t mind tho. Have fun, and good times!

[@PilotPlater]

when it was first proposed on ADSB frequencies it made sense. There's the possibility for manned aircraft to find the drones and actually improve safety. Sadly it has nothing to do with safety, it's just about controlling the public.

[@Braddeman]

it’s just a start to justify network remote ID. that is coming next

[@ravendarkcloud]

Wow who'd a thunk it, criminals will break laws. Politicians: "if we make laws against it we can stop it." Normal people "Don't we call them criminals because they break the laws?" I would support tech that gives out a transponder like signal that shows up on aircrafts instruments letting pilots know a hobby aircraft is being operated and caution should be observed. Much like the system Bruce had been working on.

[@dev-debug]

No different then banning something, the bad guys will still have it.

[@ryanward8039]

Well if they only target the law abiding, then it's time to stop being law abiding. Adapt and overcome.

[@HindsightFPV]

Hah! That's my neck of the woods. There's definitely a bit of open air space relatively close to the base. I remember flying in 2019 within 5 miles of Luke and didn't even realize it was that close. ( obviously I knew it was close just never considered how close) I was flying just on the side of the road as police car are driving by and still nobody said a single thing to me.

[@rodgersrcaviation2785]

I’m pretty sure there is more of those than don’t than those that do.

[@Grant82gc]

That goldstar TV is amazing, I had one when I was a teenager .

[@Geckatron]

Hope you get a better summer than we did here in Northern Ireland 😁

[@squaddingquads]

Bruce as ALWAYS dropping the truth bombs

[@sandasturner9529]

Hopefully remote identification can help prevent small/recreational aircraft from entering restricted airspace

[@FPVwineUK]

New Zealand, after Covid, showed me that NZ is owned and operated by bad actors. And there Jacinda Ardern was with BlackRock. Great video as always, love a good rant!

[@rjung_ch]

That does seem so very shady indeed, about your ex PM.

[@Milosz_Ostrow]

Before commercial drones were available, there were hobbyists building quadcopters, hexacopters and octocopters from scratch and sharing design information online. There is nothing stopping a technically skilled person from digging up the designs from the Web and building one's own drones that don't embody Remote ID and potentially greatly exceed the range and altitude capabilities of those early efforts.

[@TheProCut17]

corruption and bureaucracy

[@edwinkania5286]

When the Govt gets involved it always fails

[@MoonRabbitFPV]

Awesome video as always 👊😎thanks for sharing 😊🙏

[@rrittenhouse]

They wanted the original plan for network remote ID though LOL. Broadcast rid was their fallback plan if I recall correctly. The network rid would have been real bad and I'm sure it's still their eventual goal.

[@charlestoast4051]

Funny, isn't it. Most commonly available camera drones have a service ceiling of about 4000m - so even if you can hack the firmware, you can't get up to the kind of heights of these claimed sightings.

[@russr]

the thing with AeroScope, is it only works with DJI stuff...

[@Klemheist-vf1hx]

A nearby military base here in Australia operates a commercial drone detector system with a 5km range. It detects the interface signals between the drone and controller. As to doing something about it like jamming or spoofing the signal, they are currently not empowered. I suppose they could coordinate with the Police to figure out who was at the controller's location via mobile phone pinging, or even attendance if they are fast enough. Unlikely to occur unless it is a regular or persistent thing.

[@slapdat.byteme]

With my Fimi drones, I can fly with “Airplane Mode” enabled on both my phone and tablet. This also prevents drone pausing for new firmware updates that I know I don’t need. I fly safely but will NEVER comply with BS regulation like remote ID.

[@VintageSlots]

There are RID receivers out there which detect drones for 5+ miles. Also, Aeroscope will not detect non DJI drones.

[@1101nz]

The new rules in NZ are a joke. We have/had Jet Aircraft pilots(Air NZ) at my RC Club. They now arnt qualifiied to be a spotter for RC flyers . Seems real pilots arnt qualified enough to look out for low flying planes . We'll see how many in NZ DONT choose to resit their Wings badges , now that many have to be renew them next year (now a required 5 year renewal) . I bet many will say stuff it rather than re-sit wings & just fly at a park rather than a RC Club with the RC Club's restrictive rules & regs

[@xjet]

MFNZ, the "recognised organisation" for RC model flying, has a very tricky problem on its hands -- trying to appease the bureaucrats whilst protecting the freedoms of its members. Personally, I believe they should have stood up for our rights more than they have done (but others will doubtless disagree and I respect their opinions). What MFNZ, CAA and MoT have to understand is that you can tie someone up with the rubber bands of over-regulation and keep increasing the tension but eventually, when you over-do it, those bands will snap and become useless. I believe we're reaching that point now. Our current ruleset for RC/drones (part 101) came into effect in 2015 and there have been no substantive changes since. We used to be smart enough to realise that something under 100g was just a toy and ought not be covered by regulations that also cover 14.9Kg octocopters -- but that is no longer the case. Whereas other countries (such as Canada and the UK) have recognised that sub250g craft are pretty harmless, and are therefore pretty unrestricted, we have no such intelligence behind our rules and I break the rules every time I fly my 25g Mobula 6 around the house using FPV. MFNZ has said "no problem, just apply for a BVLOS waiver" -- but the brainboxes at MFNZ and CAA still believe that to fly a 25g tinywhoop around my house I'd need signs, traffic management and an armful of forms before such an activity could be performed safely. I've got news for them... I do this several times a week (without the bureaucratic overhead) and hardly anyone has died as a result. The property-permission provision of 101 is also being widely ignored because it effectively means that every part of NZ, aside from a few council parks and your own property, is a no-fly zone unless you can get the permission of those who own or occupy that property. Tourists coming to NZ with their drone will have almost zero opportunity to fly it legally under this part of the rule -- so they just do it illegally, often out of ignorance. Where are the bodies? After consulting, back in 2021 we were promised changes. We're now approaching 2015 and we've got nothing. CAA often refers to itself as a "fast follower" in terms of regulation. Not this time eh?

[@AlfieDoug]

I hope I don;t get that cranky when I get old, I'm 74 now and enjoy flying and don't get all twisted about rules I can either comply with or choose to ignore where appropriate.

[@AerialWaviator]

This past weekend .. "An unprecedented number of airplanes, helicopters, and drones swooping in to help with Hurricane Helene recovery efforts are now posing a safety hazard. There were 30 near-mid-air collisions last Saturday," according to a federal source. The major issue here is that the general aviation principle of "seen and be seen" is broken when it comes to FAA rules/procedures for crewed and uncrewed aircraft. Both crewed and uncrewed aircraft are essential in post-event disaster scenarios like with hurricane Helene. Drones to inspect infrastructure and identify people in need of rescue and supplies. Crewed helicopters and airplanes to airlift people and supplies. Add in the varied terrain in a mountainous region where drones are flying below 400 feet AGL (ground reference), while crewed vehicles are operation based on pressure altitude ASL (sea level reference), and potential for overlapping operations greatly increases. The FAA and FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Admin) really need to re-examine such scenarios as we see more climate induce disasters and catastrophic weather events (flooding, hurricanes, wildfires, etc). So far the policy with respect to wildfires is to ground crewed aircraft if any drone is spotted flying. This greatly hampers efforts by firefighters, as unexpected delays are introduced randomly. Much time wasted in attempts to track down a drone operator. Ideally both crewed and unscrewed aircraft would broadcast on common frequencies so they could be seen and alerted to each others presence. ie: a common shared frequency for sharing position and altitude data.

[@AL-RCjunkie]

Good to see you, Bruce! I dont pay any attention to the FAA restrictions in my overly regulated area. Other than the golden rule- don't be an as$hole. No cuffs or fines, so far. Screw em, Bruce. Fly anyway. Film it all. If the CAA tries to use your footage agaisnt you, tell em it's an A I generated video. It wasnt you flying. It was Arnie! 👍

[@gogglesfpv7986]

thank you for this!

[@bobbysenterprises3220]

I can see mouse run across the highway at 75 mph, I think that's pretty good. But I don't know if i could spot and identify a drone at even 50 feet lateral distance while I'm traveling at 210mph. Incidentally that's the stall speed of said aircraft.

[@Deadzone2024]

If government's can bend the rules when it suits them. Then I think the public can do the same. Corrupt politicians make their own rules to suit the narrative. Go fly your RC Toys and have fun. I will not call them drones anymore. RC Helicopters, RC planes, Multirotors or Quads. Drone is a word I do not associate with the Hobby.

[@bryantmaximilionalpha2840]

Don’t understand why general rc hobbyists, would fall for that remote id registering, by the faa.

[@shawnzfpv]

Droneup was doing drone deliveries around town up until recently. I never once saw one on drone scanner and there is no way they were up that high.... but regardless RID is useless.

[@pyalot]

What, people who intentionally violate FAA rules do not voluntarily put a registered tracker on their drone? Tell me it ain’t so… 🤦‍♂️

[@ravenbarsrepairs5594]

RID equals IFF(Identity Friend or Foe transponders) .... All aircraft have some form of IFF, whether it turned on or not is a choice of the pilot.

[@nitro_nicksrc9629]

Other possible reasons Bruce. I would not at all exclude the possibility that many if not all of these sighting are either pilots misinterpreting what they have "seen" (recall what has been said before about how difficult it will be to see a small (or even medium sized) UAV from an aircraft travelling at 400-500 mph (or even faster if military jets)), or it is a narrative put out there to help the agenda of the military. You can just imagine the conversation about needing a reason to increase military spending or put in place even more rules to keep pesky UAV fliers out of the skies so they are free for military use (note that the vast majority of airspace is for military use). I agree though that RID is a piece of nonsense and does nothing for safety. I have submitted these views to our CAA when they have "consulted" (i.e. done what they have to by statute, but with no real intention to listen to the responses) on RID and other changes to UAV rules. Risk-based legislation? They wouldn't know it if it jumped up and bit them (and clearly they won't have done their risk assessment on that happening!). P.S. I just watched that P.O.S. news report. Sensationalist rubbish. What has happened to proper investigative journalism, checking facts, questioning the narrative? All gone to crap it seems (plus the ominous music whenever a drone in flight was being shown!). Holy crap and I thought our news reporting was rubbish.

[@ij2750]

Instead of requiring RID for everyone it only should only have been required when flying in specific sensitive locations, the law should be that anything found in sensitive areas without RID will be subject to being shot down.

[@SlackerU]

IDK if I can agree that RID can't be seen from far away. If some of these ocean ships turn their radar up they can see your head floating on a wavy ocean to come save you from the cold-water. Some of these cities have shown off their command-centers where they have access to cameras all over the city. I really need to find the video but in the CC they had access to police-body-cameras, the planes flying over the city to track speeders... just all sorts of fancy stuff to put up on the 50-100 screens.

[@lindsaypayne7972]

Bruce, a mate of mine doing security at Pearce Airforce base over here in Western Australia say they shoot down, on average, 1 drone a week that is operating within the perimeter of the active airport. no rfid required... Ya think that will change if an rfid requirement is invoked? yeah, naah.

[@Qwarzz]

Yea, never understood why anyone would expect criminals to fit a remoteID in their drones. I assume the people deciding on this expect everyone to just buy ready made drones that will have remoteID built in.

[@madaknevarski6478]

Who'd have thought that 'bad actors' would flout the rules on remote ID........................................

[@billflynn6903]

Love you , Bruce; No one here cares, anyway so I do my best not to crash into them. Remote ID is an ILLEGAL joke IMO.

[@genefoxgreenmountaindroning]

Thanjs for the update

[@MrGpse]

Seems like the 'sense and avoid' system would have been a better option.

[@IanF-FPV]

Waiting here for Tim McKay’s response video…👌🏾👌🏾😭😭

[@xjet]

Hahahaha! Damn... now I'll have to clean the coffee off my screen (again). Thanks for brightening up my day!! 😀

[@chiprobertson3094]

The future is gonna suck they don't want you having tools to fight them

[@kevalinopicks5555]

Well said, Bruce. It's an absolute joke and made to remove us from our little bit of airspace so that the fat cats can exploit it and get fatter. Good to see you back on again!

[@alexcook4851]

lol, let me turn on remote id for my airforce base recon. mission.

[@LTPottenger]

They care more about regulating the sheep than the bad guys.

[@LockFarm]

Ah... the problem is clearly that we don't have enough remote Id... we need to have it on more things. Our flight controllers. Us. Our cars. Our neighbours. We won't be safe until everyone is tracked 24/7 and therefore cannot do anything illegal ;)

[@rjung_ch]

Bruce, since when have any government in so many countries ever said the truth? Yeah, I can't come up with any.

[@MrClydie_Po_Po]

Epic t-shirt, Sir. Oh, and the video!

[@johnmuir2487]

Yeah I would love to see a video on nz laws

[@mamarussellthepie3995]

Unfortunate government overreach. . .

[@raffly4449]

It gives the government POWER. THAT IS ALL THEY CARE ABOUT.

[@antonnym214]

Don't you get it? Big Brother will always want to be bigger.

[@koalatails5711]

It’s a bird, it’s a plane, NO, it’s a drone! Seen something but couldn’t identify it? No problem, no matter what it looks like, or how impossible this explanation is, officially it’s listed as a “drone sighting”.

[@sgtsawhill1]

I have been flying my drone around my house and kept forgetting to put my RID on it.. no visits yet....😊

[@dezent]

They call everything drone even UAP.

[@NexxuSix]

As I’ve always said, it won’t be the criminals that register their drones, it will only be the law abiding citizens. There is literally nothing keeping anyone from being a bad actor, which will ruin the hobby for everyone.

[@Nkkdxn45j]

Trouble is, all that about remote ID is completely true, but it didn't stop it being implemented in the US, and moving on to other countries.

[@MACE1-1]

Bahahahahahahah- I've said this for years. The FAA is not here to help you....!

[@gmrocwater9922]

The ones complaining about it are the ones doing it .

[@SneakySneaky1010]

I'm not sure about your citizenship status but thank you going to fight and speaking your mind for fellow Americans. 73

[@MrSpikebender]

Actually I'm surprised as hell we have access to parts and can still fly in the states. They are just using like 250s in Ukraine and doing some freestyle tank stuff with them.