Doom 2016 in my opinion has better designs for the demons. They look so organic and fleshy
@TheOneAndOnlyMasemanFunStuff4 ай бұрын
Eternal was going for a classic look, not a super high detail look. (i think)
@TheAlienHasArrived4 ай бұрын
@@TheOneAndOnlyMasemanFunStuff Yeah. I can tell that was what they were going for. I still prefer 2016’s more gritty and scary designs but Eternal definitely does give off classic DOOM vibes
@TheOneAndOnlyMasemanFunStuff4 ай бұрын
@@TheAlienHasArrived yeah
@TheOneAndOnlyMasemanFunStuff4 ай бұрын
@@TheAlienHasArrived i agree tho
@swansong4253 ай бұрын
I think this is definitely true with the revenant. They also act a lot more animated, but you usually do not see them sitting static like that in the game. I am SO GLAD they brought back the classic cyberdemon. Also the new mancubus is better. Doom Eternal feels more like Doom 2 overall. I will never forget playing the earth levels in the original doom 2 and seeing the low-res ruined background texture and feeling chills. If only my 12 year old self could see how stunning and surreal the backdrops are of doom eternal.
@Badger_god1234 ай бұрын
Eternals demons look more cartoonish, while the 2016 demons look more like freaks of nature
@nochesangrientoft355 ай бұрын
The demons of Doom 2016 is still better, they are more threatening and terrifying
@george2p5 ай бұрын
Terrifying? You 12?
@Leon300Nd5 ай бұрын
@@george2p I have to admit that the hell knight is a little intimidating
@guybrush30004 ай бұрын
@@george2pyou’re a really cool tough guy
@manni86884 ай бұрын
@@george2pOh like you wouldn’t be scared to face a pinky in real life. A creature that could kill you much faster than a tiger
@bigimp30184 ай бұрын
@@manni8688 you would fear anything from both games in real life
@Artanis864 ай бұрын
Doom classic monsters somewhat looks scary in a psychological way. They look like twisted mutilated deformed humans. My first doom game is The plutonia experiment, I was like 9 years old, the scariest level at that time was MAP11: Hunted.
@bryanferratt65984 ай бұрын
The scariest demon monster to me is Tyrese Gibson 😊😅😂.
@Pihal_metrovich.4 ай бұрын
Doom 2 - 360p Doom Eternal - 720p Doom 2016 - 4K
@aliyanahmed15164 ай бұрын
ikr right, doom 2016 models are WAY WAY better.
@solarprakhyat65454 ай бұрын
I think that's more of a lighting thing
@erenyaeger76623 ай бұрын
The doom eternal models are higher quality
@SURGEONAA22 ай бұрын
@@aliyanahmed1516terrible opinion 🤡🤡🤡
@travistouchdown72903 күн бұрын
Nah
@MaceLupo4 ай бұрын
Soldiers from 2016? Shotgun guy? Commando? Summoner? Hell Razer? Prowler? All the Zombies?
@ДмитрийВишняков-л5в4 ай бұрын
в DOOM есть призыватель но он по другому выглядит
@MaceLupo4 ай бұрын
@@ДмитрийВишняков-л5в Video says "all Monsters"
@ARandomDude592 ай бұрын
Something about a cacodemon without pupils is just so horrifying
@buddah12213 ай бұрын
I know people hated Doom 3 but the character designs were really cool
@MelonieDaniels-mr3qb3 ай бұрын
Doom 3 good game but bad doom Game
@risinggael16853 ай бұрын
@MelonieDaniels-mr3qb I say that about resi 4 onwards though 7 brought it back kinda and revelations somewhat...but when it comes to doom and quake just give a run and gun game old school with its puzzles and secrets
@MelodicTurtleMetal3 ай бұрын
Doom 3 was great. Mancubus in that game was amazing, easily the best the series have seen. Imps didn't look the best, but i liked how they used them in that game. One of my favourite games, and while not at initially entertaining or satisfying as the Dooms, it also feels less forgettable. I think i liked it more than eternal. Eternal was a bit of a mess
@pacoramon94683 ай бұрын
As a horror version of good, works great, specially the new creepy enemies like the head spiders.
@CabezasDePescado2 ай бұрын
The second half of Doom 3 it feels so much more like Doom than any of the crap in D16 or Eternal which are just repetitive arena shooters, is just more enjoyable. I actually played D3 a few years ago and was surprised by how much i enjoyed it, in contrast both new Dooms are a chore, the second time i went through D16 to get ready for Eternal i had to force myself to play it because of how boring and repetitive it is.
@lganeshan864 ай бұрын
2016 all the way
@Megs_the_gamer4 ай бұрын
I will admit that’s Spider-mastermind design was epic and quite a few others
@darkinsanity984733 ай бұрын
I will always prefer the original and Eternal. I like that Eternal went back to the classic designs just with the graphics of today. Blows mind that so many seem to like 2016 more.
@filmowewyprawy3 ай бұрын
Baron of hell in eternal looks closer to baron of hell in 2. But not sure hell night got bald and hornless in 2016 and eternal?
@Adam-lw8lv3 ай бұрын
@@filmowewyprawy Hell Knight uses Doom 3 design
@filmowewyprawy3 ай бұрын
@@Adam-lw8lvthanks I never play Doom3 that’s why.
@CLSit-bz4xi2 ай бұрын
Same. 2016 models might be more "realistic" but it didn't feel nearly as "DOOM" as eternal models. Don't even get me started on that god awful 2016 mancubus reimagining
@somethingsomethinggr25 күн бұрын
I prefer the Eternal designs too with the exception of the Revenant which I think looks better in Doom 2016.
@joseberia59855 ай бұрын
Doom 64 and Doom 3?
@KYeRmit.so-cool4 ай бұрын
they’re are to many variants from doom 3 that aren’t in other games
@Cole-nf2dx4 ай бұрын
it’s says in the title doom I-II vs Doom(2016 vs Doom eternal
@NeilusNihilus4 ай бұрын
Too terrible to include.
@Ballsestfan4 ай бұрын
@@NeilusNihilusdoom 3 is not terrible same with 64
@miztahfrawg3 ай бұрын
FUCK doom 3 lol
@louisralph62063 ай бұрын
I think 2016 designs were more gritty and hellish, eternal seems toned down and maybe a little more retro like
@VRHyoumaru4 ай бұрын
Wonder why Doom Eternal regressed to a more retro-faithful deal with most of the demons.
@bigimp30184 ай бұрын
Because its awesome
@BreadTeleporter19684 ай бұрын
You haven’t seen anything yet, the Dark ages imp looks JUST like the classic!
@Marksman34344 ай бұрын
Probably cuz they wanted their designs to be an even closer callback to the OG designs of Doom I-II
@maynardsdick3 ай бұрын
Les regression, more course correction. Doom 2016 took some of the character designs in a bad direction. Probably the best example being the cyberdemon. The eternal version isn't just better, it's better by leaps and bounds.
@SURGEONAA22 ай бұрын
Because it’s better
@TartarusPyro4 ай бұрын
It's so sad 2016 and eternal dont have monster alert sounds so sad how they missed that
@EquestrianKatz3 ай бұрын
Ikr?! :/
@ammagon45193 ай бұрын
Yeah, really love opening a door and hearing a baron's roar
@EquestrianKatz3 ай бұрын
@@ammagon4519 Better yet, a good ol AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA skele' boy!
@Creidexe2 ай бұрын
At least in doom eternal, cacodemons do their signature cry sometimes.
@DoomWar14 ай бұрын
They improved all of the designs except for the baron of hell. The 2016 baron is far better looking than eternals with the blades. Why have a baron of hell with blades when you already had the dread knight which has blades? Just my opinion both badass games.
@erikpng3 ай бұрын
I fully agree here.
@inputbeetle4 ай бұрын
Eternal’s designs are worse than 2016’s as the eternal had a lot more demons per fight than 2016 and needed to perform better. Baron of hell is better tho
@user-ud7gv3br5d4 ай бұрын
Except this is just plain wrong, there's a video that compares closely 2016 and eternal monsters and I think except for the revenant every monster in eternal is way more detailed. Why would they need to make the enemies look worse to make the game perform better when they're adding new gore mechanics for every single enemy to every bullet you fire into them
@@user-ud7gv3br5d my mistake og thanks for enlightening me 🙏
@erikpng3 ай бұрын
Interesting. I like all the demons in eternal better except the Baron.
@IronThreads333Күн бұрын
Different aesthetics for different games. Doom 2016 is meant to be darker and moodier IMO.
@hoangcoconut4 ай бұрын
doom monsters just got 2 coffee and an energy drink while eternal monsters just woken up on monday
@xenon37593 ай бұрын
I love how faithful Doom Eternal is to the original games while expanding on them like crazy. No shade to Doom 2016 but there’s a reason I’ve played significantly more Eternal lol
@darkspark58545 ай бұрын
I want to say I prefer the 2016 He’ll Kight over the Eternal Hell Kight but every time I see it I get Samus Unknown plant Vietnam flashbacks
@gregdeandrea14504 ай бұрын
Yeah, Doom 3 had my favorite Mancubus.
@roguespartan28544 ай бұрын
I like both, but 2016's Hell Knight Glory Kills were better.
@Turkey-fq5lv4 ай бұрын
Am i weird for liking the classic hell knight?
@Garry5032 ай бұрын
Doom 2016’s Hell Knights look far more intimidating Eternal’s just look goofy
@thelonewolf1914 ай бұрын
2016 enemies look more Alien than demon
@fake.bananasalt20993 ай бұрын
what about the lost soul?
@kent66512 ай бұрын
Aren't demons aliens?)
@bryanbrowls4381Ай бұрын
Yes most of them
@DemodprotoАй бұрын
100%
@MiguelDiazGonzalezКүн бұрын
Agree
@erikl69883 ай бұрын
OG demons are still my fav. Glad they went with the older look for the Cyber Demon in Eternal..
@cody37574 ай бұрын
OoOoO so in Eternal they go for their OLD look but updated. That's cool. 2016 is like "darker". Love them both. Very rare [to me] that a game out does itself within multiple games. Gears of War // DOOM
@happybuggy15823 ай бұрын
2:40 2016 even the lighting inside his mouth is well made
@denifnaf58744 ай бұрын
I hate how in this video classic doom isn't normal pixels but some smooth shit
@kakophonien65142 ай бұрын
Ugh, texture filter
@reaperdude42342 ай бұрын
It’s probably pulled from GZdoom which is basically high def high quality og doom
@kakophonien65142 ай бұрын
@@reaperdude4234 yup. But you can turn off the texture filtering therr. And they didn't.
@regnumsolipsi59352 ай бұрын
2016 is easily the best demon design in the series. Eternal went way too cartoonish and a lot of the details feel like they've been flattened or diminished. It's like looking at the difference between Halo 4 and Halo 5...
@ViennaSteeler3 ай бұрын
Doom 3 has forgotten stepchild syndrome.
@baccy814 ай бұрын
Despite 30 years of graphic advancements, the original 1993 monsters are still the most kick-ass. Just an unbeatable design
@einarr73013 ай бұрын
Hard facts. The new enemies in 2016 and eternal are too refined, too polished, too clean.
@baccy813 ай бұрын
@@einarr7301 yes, and despite that they look lifeless and not threatening
@brandslav59893 ай бұрын
Don't know about that, I think that's just a matter of what you grew up on.
@camaxideАй бұрын
The problem is that just like Doom3 it all looks like clay models.. the whole model looks like a cut out mesh, and the entire texture has the same matte/glossy finish. Why isnt there a difference - bone, flesh, skin, fur - it should all have distinct material finishes. I don't know if the engine or the modellers is the issue, but it certainly does not live up to what I expect could be the best 3D-conversion of the amazing original Doom monsters.
@baccy81Ай бұрын
@@camaxide I agree mate, I don't understand why nowadays all textures have to look shiny. The old pixel made everything look alive, despite being so primitive in comparison
@erickmoya14013 ай бұрын
2016 has its own achievement. Love them. Eternal tried to take them back to the origins. Love also. Different games, yet pieces of art in the own.
@tulliorufini17534 ай бұрын
You miss all the demons in doom 3😢
@K-kof20002 ай бұрын
Ugly versions
@chaser12544 ай бұрын
2016 all the way. Wish they kept initial imp design from 2015 demo though. It was even more demonic.
@asimplepie22794 ай бұрын
A mini hell knight basically
@erikpng3 ай бұрын
That one was waaaay too gray.
@aarononeil98324 ай бұрын
Feels wrong to completely leave out Doom 64 and Doom 3
@NeilusNihilus4 ай бұрын
Yeah but Doom 3 wasn't Doom and Doom 64 no one played.
@leo_the_v.38474 ай бұрын
@@NeilusNihilusSpeak for yourself
@NeilusNihilus4 ай бұрын
@@leo_the_v.3847 I think I speak for everyone.
@leo_the_v.38474 ай бұрын
@@NeilusNihilus You think. Well, you thought wrong.
@NeilusNihilus4 ай бұрын
@@leo_the_v.3847 No one knows Doom 64 except gog and it was good. Doom 3 was garbage in comoparison to 1 and 2.
@eternalfps31243 ай бұрын
I hope for Doom the Dark Ages, they go for a more primal look for the demons because the bright colors from Eternal definitely won’t work. 2016 definitely had the better design choices, still baffles me as to why they went an almost cartoon route with Eternal.
@MajorLukeTV2 ай бұрын
I didn’t realize until now how terrifying the cacodemon and hell knights were in 2016, one not having eyes and the other having no pupil just an eye is scary
@danilomannocchi4 ай бұрын
Doom 3 has some of the best models...
@marianoluna73503 ай бұрын
Classic are more scary than the new CGI ones. They look like toys full of colors and lights
@Deabru33 ай бұрын
Nice video! it would be amazing to see Doom 3 designs in the comparison
@jakemarcus99992 ай бұрын
Doom Eternal demons are closer to original. I really like that design choice
@filmowewyprawy3 ай бұрын
Tbh I’m happy with just 1+2 but i appreciate the passion someone put to modernize the beloved franchise. Never felt I had to play nothing beyond 1+2 though
@SK16PION2 ай бұрын
The cyberdemon got a massive downgrade from 2016 to eternal, but I will say it’s a lot more accurate to the original. 2016’s one is a lot more intimidating.
@evanevans44693 ай бұрын
likely to be an unpopular opinion, but they really really dropped the ball on 2016 and Doom Eternal. The original designs are ambiguous in a way that feels genuinely uncanny and mysterious. The updated designs are not eerie at all they just look like monsters someone designed to look *cool* in a video game. Some of the Eternal designs feel closer to their original essence but overall still run into the same problem. They’re over-designed. FromSoftware somehow avoids this issue when they design monsters for games. The artistry gap is huge.
@camgeiger2 ай бұрын
I like the art style of 2016 better even though Eternal respects the source material better. Everything from the DOOM guy down to the guns. I just like 2016 better, and I don't even play DOOM.
@oldnelson42982 ай бұрын
Would be cool to see the comparison with Doom 3 included. It was 11 years after the original Doom and 13 years before Doom 2016, so almost right in the middle. I know people love to hate that game, but I always liked it. It was visually impressive at the time and, although a departure from the arcade nature of the original two Dooms, it was a good game and developed the story/lore.
@alejandrooro99324 ай бұрын
I never liked a lot the 3d versions. I fell that they should aim for a simplier style to be more realistic. Its just my preference
@SURGEONAA22 ай бұрын
They look just fine, you’re just picky
@GoldenDen214 ай бұрын
Classic, Perfect, something between
@aldorechiasson3 ай бұрын
2016 looks so much better!
@jennywatson25274 ай бұрын
Do you think that the mancubus in the new doom dark ages is a combination of the previous mancs like with the more rounder head of the doom 2 mancubus more of demonic technologie and more rotting like 2016 and the doom eternal manc skin tone
@Jax494 ай бұрын
But why the demented filter
@caclarkjr142 ай бұрын
I feel like the actual designs are kind of 50/50, here and there between 2016 and Eternal, but I do very much appreciate how Eternal's demons don't have such over-exaggerated, bouncy, cartoonish idle animations.
@K-kof20002 ай бұрын
Imp: good but could be all brown. Revenant: good but seems to have shrunk in Eternal. Knight: ugly in 2016 and a little better in Eternal, I like the original which is a lite version of Baron, I would like to see that maintained. Demon: perfect, in general the more stationary demons are more intimidating than in the "restless" version (2016). Cacodemon: I prefer the perfect meatball version, in the others he just looks old and withered, Eternal is a little better. Baron: Very good but I don't understand why he turned gray. Fatso; 2016: horrible, they even turned him into a cyclops. Eternal: perfect but he's a little pale. Soul: It doesn't make sense for him to be without fire in his head, Eternal is perfect. Cyberdemon: horrible in 2016, perfect in Eternal. Pain: Good. Arachnotron: Good but his skeletal face was reused for other demons, like Imp. Vile: Perfect. Mastermind: Perfect. C.Fatso: Horrible/cool but it's a bit weird that the chest armor moves like muscle.
@Hyp3Active4 ай бұрын
Doom 2016 demons look like bugs
@Harry_BahlzanyaАй бұрын
I really like the doom 1 mod with the 2016 models been enjoying that lately
@LootboxOfTruth4 ай бұрын
In the original games the hell knight was basically just a brown baron that was a bit smaller and weaker werent they? There were slight differences in the model but not a lot from wut i saw
@ph-fi7qo4 ай бұрын
It was, 2016/Eternal Hell Knight is inspired by Doom 3 version.
@LootboxOfTruth4 ай бұрын
@@ph-fi7qo the doom 3 one mustve been decent if the 2016 and eternal ones turned out so good
@Carlos-kh5qu3 ай бұрын
@lootbox9071 Doom 3 is the odd one among all Doom games, slow combat, dark enclosed corridors, "horror" elements
@LootboxOfTruth3 ай бұрын
@@Carlos-kh5qu i was talking about the model for the hell knight, not the gameplay
@feltycomic85585 ай бұрын
The original doom designs were trying to make something scary with what little technology they had at the time and doom 2016 does the same (but with better tech this time), but doom eternal harkins back to the originals but just ends up looking more cartoonish and goofy and I can't say I like it over the 2016 version.
@TheLawnMowingMan5 ай бұрын
Blud defo got nostalgia goggles on for 2016💀. Eternal is way better 🥱
@feltycomic85585 ай бұрын
@@TheLawnMowingMan Nostalgia? I played it 5 years ago thats not nostalgia
@feltycomic85585 ай бұрын
@@TheLawnMowingMan Plus I actually like doom eternal more but I just like the art direction of 2016 more
@smgt41084 ай бұрын
@@feltycomic8558 yeah they does
@therealransu4 ай бұрын
@@feltycomic8558 I agree, 2016's art focused more on atmosphere and immersion while Eternal had a more arcade-ish direction hence the designs of the demons being sort of less detailed.
@darydot3 ай бұрын
i like the eternal designs more cos of how much more cartoonish they are they look a lot less threatening and considering the doomslayer doesnt feel anywhere near threatened by them it feels like im seeing the world through his eyes
@maciejweiss553 ай бұрын
Doom 2016 monsters take first place without any doubts. Ethernal’s monsters look worse.
@SURGEONAA22 ай бұрын
Terrible opinion
@Snake_20662 ай бұрын
OG Doom and Doom Eternal are both pretty good, but feel cartoony. Doom 2016 is a lot more realistic and gritty, and the models are also more detailed in a lot of respects. I get they likely had to pull back on model detail in Eternal due to performance constraints but there difference’s are there regardless.
@RunningWormProd3 ай бұрын
The cacodemon from eternal Is Crazy! Like that hyper realistic drawn creepy moments from ren and stimpy..i thing they got more original with 2016 but made the best choice for eternal to go back to the roots
@DwarvenMechCommando813 ай бұрын
I still wish they gave the HellKnight some kind of horns back. Like a little different from the Baron at least. They are both basically based on mythical Minotaur
@Hammudiii4 ай бұрын
Doom 64?
@mattschmerbeck83752 ай бұрын
Some of the Doom 2016 monsters, like the revenant, look more realistic than the cartoonish look of some of Eternals enemies.. Not sure why the changes were even made.
@SURGEONAA22 ай бұрын
No one cares what you think, most of Eternal’s designs are an upgrade
@Aegis45212 ай бұрын
I liked the red, fleshy aberration theme that 2016 had going on
@MiaCulpa242 ай бұрын
Its a matter of taste, but i personally love the Eternal looks more, because they have all the character that the original sprites did 2016 is definitrly trying to fit a more "cohesive" unitifed design, but it takes alot of the charm out, especially on the Soliders, Mancubus, Cyberdemon, ect
@erenatukeren37273 ай бұрын
As someone played the entire series Doom 2016 has the most fun among them
@doodoostankman3 ай бұрын
doom 2016 did a great deal on makin the demons scary while eternal payed more homage to the original. i like the classic demon looks in eternal but overall the demons in 2016 are graciously designed
@TheRealJochen2 ай бұрын
Why is texture filtering enabled for doom 1 and 2?
@libelli26954 ай бұрын
Why id software make cyberdemon like in original... 2016 is better...
@Xerces1c4 ай бұрын
in doom eternal the devs went to recreating the classic style demons and they remade cyberdemon from the classic doom and renamed it to tyrant
@bigimp30184 ай бұрын
Because the cyberdemon in 2016 is already dead they literally cannot bring him back
@BreadTeleporter19684 ай бұрын
Icl the tyrant looks way more unique than the bland cyberdemon
@Xerces1c4 ай бұрын
@@bigimp3018 lmao ye
@saiyajind-jasutin3 ай бұрын
When the Archvile sound came, i hear echos of me swearing 🤬
@JDMEXformeАй бұрын
Some designs from 2016 were better but overall Eternal is like a Nostalgic vibe. Plasma gun better too. The super shotgun field of depth looked better in 2016. Tyrant looks like the classic and Doom 64. DOOM64 is the most scariest doom.
@MunkisManimal3 ай бұрын
Don't get me wrong, I think the 2016 models were amazing, but eternal felt more faithful to the original
@VALoco1003 ай бұрын
Doom 2016 - Sci Fi; Doom Eternal - fantasy.
@JSmithski23 күн бұрын
I finished Doom 1 and 2 again this year and I have to tell you these monsters are still terrifying
@VonWitSlitsАй бұрын
5:15 song??
@manuelgrothe6084 ай бұрын
Blood, Guts and Dinner
@Gzm-ci2pw2 ай бұрын
The design of Eternal looks like a remake of the original which is good imo, and in 2016 they look more challenging.
@EdKolis9 күн бұрын
I feel like the Eternal versions are more faithful to the original than 2016's are, but sometimes 2016 does them better...
@tcchip3 ай бұрын
Wished you added Doom 64 and Doom 3 to the comparisons too.
@krishanuphukan80Ай бұрын
Eternal kept the original design. 2016 just made them more scarier.
@lukaspodrazil95473 ай бұрын
I'm not even surprised that there are mods for doom 2. The same monsters but in better graphics. As with most games these days.
@MaxUlf-e1k4 ай бұрын
Why did you guys leave out doom3 ?
@smelkus4 ай бұрын
I hope Doom the dark ages includes all the variants of different demon types
@Pulang_Diwa3 ай бұрын
I kinda wanted a Doom 3 comparison also.
@azureblue292 ай бұрын
Now do one with Doom 64 please! It had unique models 🙏🏻😁
@ahqasrawi26 күн бұрын
Am I the only one that thinks the original doom from the 1990s had the coolest and scariest demons? May be its the lack of details that gives a psychological sense of horror
@fran12345625 күн бұрын
I was thinking the same. In doom2 there were demons, 2016 and eternal they are more like aliens. I don't remember well but doom3 I think kept more the original essence
@chrisbingley2 ай бұрын
It's somewhat hilarious how a 2D sprite, with all of 2 animation frames and 5 pixels looks better than the newer models.
@kent66512 ай бұрын
Lol, what? No way. Doom 2016 looks the best, doom 2 is ok, but better than new ones for sure)
Doom Eternal looks like 343 Industries developed it
@joshendebar3 ай бұрын
Ich weis nicht warum, aber das alte Doom hat mich mehr gefesselt.
@masonconnor73563 ай бұрын
Revenant hittin the stanky leg in doom ii
@Colvalan4103 ай бұрын
2D sprites were way more scary to play against
@haroldlebron73484 ай бұрын
Soy yo o hay alguien más que le gusta más como se ven los demonios de Doom 2016 que los demas?
@KalHadesman4 ай бұрын
Yep! Me!
@NOVABLASTER8 күн бұрын
Doom has good design 2016 is also good in its own way, Eternal resembles the original design. (I mean some were more accurate in 2016 but)😊
@sheilaolfieway18854 ай бұрын
I really prefer the classic look especailly for the baron and hell knight the more goat look to the originals just sits better with me.
@koishem8051Ай бұрын
Doom Eternal models are still better imo. The game is not THAT serious now, it's more of an original feel Yeah, 2016 models are kinda scarier, but still
@VincitOmniaVeritas72 ай бұрын
I prefer DOOM Eternal’s design for the Cyberdemon, Lost Souls and Mancubus. All others look better in DOOM 2016.
@Javsco29 күн бұрын
Shame you didn't include Doom 64. It is canonical to these ones.
@trashdoge12174 ай бұрын
Imma actually disagree with most of the comments since no most of the designs in eternal are much better especially because they feel more alive. Instead of the whole creature moving as a whole it has parts that move independently especially visable on the caco with the breathing visable and the mouth
@DenverStarkey3 ай бұрын
should have included doom 3's designs .. so much in doom 2016 carried over from doom 3 such as the hell knight's design .
@miikavihersaari3104Ай бұрын
I don't understand why they decided to go for this cartoonish design instead of going back to the brutal demonic design of the original Doom 1&2. Look at the pinky for example. In Doom 1 it looks like a malformed piece of demonic rage, whereas the 2016 and 2020 are more like stylized cartoon beasts with blocky patches of chitin. Also why'd they have to make the Lost Soul look sleek like a gamer mouse? Look at all those complicated edges and angles. Like it's going to compete in F1 or something.
@MbxstudiosАй бұрын
If ID still done the classic hell knite i think DOOM would have been more realistic than a bald srong grey armoured human against a imatating horned half human half goat beast