DOOM - All Monsters Comparison - DOOM I-II vs DOOM (2016) vs DOOM Eternal

[@Badger_god123]

Eternals demons look more cartoonish, while the 2016 demons look more like freaks of nature

[@bluecube1-y1k]

baron of hell though

[@TheAlienHasArrived]

Doom 2016 in my opinion has better designs for the demons. They look so organic and fleshy

[@MasemanNJbro]

Eternal was going for a classic look, not a super high detail look. (i think)

[@TheAlienHasArrived]

@@MasemanNJbro Yeah. I can tell that was what they were going for. I still prefer 2016’s more gritty and scary designs but Eternal definitely does give off classic DOOM vibes

[@MasemanNJbro]

@@TheAlienHasArrived yeah

[@MasemanNJbro]

@@TheAlienHasArrived i agree tho

[@swansong425]

I think this is definitely true with the revenant. They also act a lot more animated, but you usually do not see them sitting static like that in the game. I am SO GLAD they brought back the classic cyberdemon. Also the new mancubus is better. Doom Eternal feels more like Doom 2 overall. I will never forget playing the earth levels in the original doom 2 and seeing the low-res ruined background texture and feeling chills. If only my 12 year old self could see how stunning and surreal the backdrops are of doom eternal.

[@louisralph6206]

I think 2016 designs were more gritty and hellish, eternal seems toned down and maybe a little more retro like

[@ARandomDude59]

Something about a cacodemon without pupils is just so horrifying

[@nochesangrientoft35]

The demons of Doom 2016 is still better, they are more threatening and terrifying

[@george2p]

Terrifying? You 12?

[@Leon300Nd]

​@@george2p I have to admit that the hell knight is a little intimidating

[@guybrush3000]

@@george2pyou’re a really cool tough guy

[@manni8688]

@@george2pOh like you wouldn’t be scared to face a pinky in real life. A creature that could kill you much faster than a tiger

[@bigimp3018]

@@manni8688 you would fear anything from both games in real life

[@Pihal_metrovich.]

Doom 2 - 360p Doom Eternal - 720p Doom 2016 - 4K

[@aliyanahmed1516]

ikr right, doom 2016 models are WAY WAY better.

[@solarprakhyat6545]

I think that's more of a lighting thing

[@erenyaeger7662]

The doom eternal models are higher quality

[@SURGEONAA2]

@@aliyanahmed1516terrible opinion 🤡🤡🤡

[@travistouchdown7290]

Nah

[@Artanis86]

Doom classic monsters somewhat looks scary in a psychological way. They look like twisted mutilated deformed humans. My first doom game is The plutonia experiment, I was like 9 years old, the scariest level at that time was MAP11: Hunted.

[@bryanferratt6598]

The scariest demon monster to me is Tyrese Gibson 😊😅😂.

[@nineblokk]

Exactly

[@MaceLupo]

Soldiers from 2016? Shotgun guy? Commando? Summoner? Hell Razer? Prowler? All the Zombies?

[@ДмитрийВишняков-л5в]

в DOOM есть призыватель но он по другому выглядит

[@MaceLupo]

@@ДмитрийВишняков-л5в Video says "all Monsters"

[@miguelangelmiranda8460]

​@@MaceLupo Hey nice profile pic

[@MaceLupo]

@@miguelangelmiranda8460 You too.

[@buddah1221]

I know people hated Doom 3 but the character designs were really cool

[@MelonieDaniels-mr3qb]

Doom 3 good game but bad doom Game

[@risinggael1685]

​@MelonieDaniels-mr3qb I say that about resi 4 onwards though 7 brought it back kinda and revelations somewhat...but when it comes to doom and quake just give a run and gun game old school with its puzzles and secrets

[@MelodicTurtleMetal]

Doom 3 was great. Mancubus in that game was amazing, easily the best the series have seen. Imps didn't look the best, but i liked how they used them in that game. One of my favourite games, and while not at initially entertaining or satisfying as the Dooms, it also feels less forgettable. I think i liked it more than eternal. Eternal was a bit of a mess

[@AlfredoPuente8]

As a horror version of good, works great, specially the new creepy enemies like the head spiders.

[@CabezasDePescado]

The second half of Doom 3 it feels so much more like Doom than any of the crap in D16 or Eternal which are just repetitive arena shooters, is just more enjoyable. I actually played D3 a few years ago and was surprised by how much i enjoyed it, in contrast both new Dooms are a chore, the second time i went through D16 to get ready for Eternal i had to force myself to play it because of how boring and repetitive it is.

[@hoangcoconut]

doom monsters just got 2 coffee and an energy drink while eternal monsters just woken up on monday

[@joseberia5985]

Doom 64 and Doom 3?

[@KYeRmit.so-cool]

they’re are to many variants from doom 3 that aren’t in other games

[@Cole-nf2dx]

it’s says in the title doom I-II vs Doom(2016 vs Doom eternal

[@NeilusNihilus]

Too terrible to include.

[@Ballsestfan]

@@NeilusNihilusdoom 3 is not terrible same with 64

[@miztahfrawg]

FUCK doom 3 lol

[@regnumsolipsi5935]

2016 is easily the best demon design in the series. Eternal went way too cartoonish and a lot of the details feel like they've been flattened or diminished. It's like looking at the difference between Halo 4 and Halo 5...

[@lganeshan86]

2016 all the way

[@Megs_the_gamer]

I will admit that’s Spider-mastermind design was epic and quite a few others

[@VRHyoumaru]

Wonder why Doom Eternal regressed to a more retro-faithful deal with most of the demons.

[@bigimp3018]

Because its awesome

[@BreadTeleporter1968]

You haven’t seen anything yet, the Dark ages imp looks JUST like the classic!

[@Marksman3434]

Probably cuz they wanted their designs to be an even closer callback to the OG designs of Doom I-II

[@maynardsdick]

Les regression, more course correction. Doom 2016 took some of the character designs in a bad direction. Probably the best example being the cyberdemon. The eternal version isn't just better, it's better by leaps and bounds.

[@SURGEONAA2]

Because it’s better

[@thelonewolf191]

2016 enemies look more Alien than demon

[@turntoChrist_0O]

what about the lost soul?

[@kent6651]

Aren't demons aliens?)

[@bryanbrowls4381]

Yes most of them

[@Demodproto]

100%

[@MiguelDiazGonzalez]

Agree

[@happybuggy1582]

2:40 2016 even the lighting inside his mouth is well made

[@darkinsanity98473]

I will always prefer the original and Eternal. I like that Eternal went back to the classic designs just with the graphics of today. Blows mind that so many seem to like 2016 more.

[@filmowewyprawy]

Baron of hell in eternal looks closer to baron of hell in 2. But not sure hell night got bald and hornless in 2016 and eternal?

[@Adam-lw8lv]

​@@filmowewyprawy Hell Knight uses Doom 3 design

[@filmowewyprawy]

@@Adam-lw8lvthanks I never play Doom3 that’s why.

[@CLSit-bz4xi]

Same. 2016 models might be more "realistic" but it didn't feel nearly as "DOOM" as eternal models. Don't even get me started on that god awful 2016 mancubus reimagining

[@somethingsomethinggr]

I prefer the Eternal designs too with the exception of the Revenant which I think looks better in Doom 2016.

[@baccy81]

Despite 30 years of graphic advancements, the original 1993 monsters are still the most kick-ass. Just an unbeatable design

[@einarr7301]

Hard facts. The new enemies in 2016 and eternal are too refined, too polished, too clean.

[@baccy81]

@@einarr7301 yes, and despite that they look lifeless and not threatening

[@brandslav5989]

Don't know about that, I think that's just a matter of what you grew up on.

[@camaxide]

The problem is that just like Doom3 it all looks like clay models.. the whole model looks like a cut out mesh, and the entire texture has the same matte/glossy finish. Why isnt there a difference - bone, flesh, skin, fur - it should all have distinct material finishes. I don't know if the engine or the modellers is the issue, but it certainly does not live up to what I expect could be the best 3D-conversion of the amazing original Doom monsters.

[@baccy81]

@@camaxide I agree mate, I don't understand why nowadays all textures have to look shiny. The old pixel made everything look alive, despite being so primitive in comparison

[@TartarusPyro]

It's so sad 2016 and eternal dont have monster alert sounds so sad how they missed that

[@EquestrianKatz]

Ikr?! :/

[@ammagon4519]

Yeah, really love opening a door and hearing a baron's roar

[@EquestrianKatz]

@@ammagon4519 Better yet, a good ol AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA skele' boy!

[@Creidexe]

At least in doom eternal, cacodemons do their signature cry sometimes.

[@inputbeetle]

Eternal’s designs are worse than 2016’s as the eternal had a lot more demons per fight than 2016 and needed to perform better. Baron of hell is better tho

[@user-ud7gv3br5d]

Except this is just plain wrong, there's a video that compares closely 2016 and eternal monsters and I think except for the revenant every monster in eternal is way more detailed. Why would they need to make the enemies look worse to make the game perform better when they're adding new gore mechanics for every single enemy to every bullet you fire into them

[@user-ud7gv3br5d]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/sH_dXp1sj9ygj68si=zxKFaaEntK6a73JL

[@inputbeetle]

@@user-ud7gv3br5d my mistake og thanks for enlightening me 🙏

[@erikpng]

Interesting. I like all the demons in eternal better except the Baron.

[@IronThreads333]

Different aesthetics for different games. Doom 2016 is meant to be darker and moodier IMO.

[@erickmoya1401]

2016 has its own achievement. Love them. Eternal tried to take them back to the origins. Love also. Different games, yet pieces of art in the own.

[@ViennaSteeler]

Doom 3 has forgotten stepchild syndrome.

[@DoomWar1]

They improved all of the designs except for the baron of hell. The 2016 baron is far better looking than eternals with the blades. Why have a baron of hell with blades when you already had the dread knight which has blades? Just my opinion both badass games.

[@erikpng]

I fully agree here.

[@xenon3759]

I love how faithful Doom Eternal is to the original games while expanding on them like crazy. No shade to Doom 2016 but there’s a reason I’ve played significantly more Eternal lol

[@erikl6988]

OG demons are still my fav. Glad they went with the older look for the Cyber Demon in Eternal..

[@darkspark5854]

I want to say I prefer the 2016 He’ll Kight over the Eternal Hell Kight but every time I see it I get Samus Unknown plant Vietnam flashbacks

[@gregdeandrea1450]

Yeah, Doom 3 had my favorite Mancubus.

[@roguespartan2854]

I like both, but 2016's Hell Knight Glory Kills were better.

[@Turkey-fq5lv]

Am i weird for liking the classic hell knight?

[@Garry503]

Doom 2016’s Hell Knights look far more intimidating Eternal’s just look goofy

[@SK16PION]

The cyberdemon got a massive downgrade from 2016 to eternal, but I will say it’s a lot more accurate to the original. 2016’s one is a lot more intimidating.

[@Engineergaming1010]

Doom 1 - the og Doom (2016) - different monster looks Doom eternal - looks like og ones but with doom 2016 style.

[@cody3757]

OoOoO so in Eternal they go for their OLD look but updated. That's cool. 2016 is like "darker". Love them both. Very rare [to me] that a game out does itself within multiple games. Gears of War // DOOM

[@denifnaf5874]

I hate how in this video classic doom isn't normal pixels but some smooth shit

[@kakophonien6514]

Ugh, texture filter

[@reaperdude4234]

It’s probably pulled from GZdoom which is basically high def high quality og doom

[@kakophonien6514]

@@reaperdude4234 yup. But you can turn off the texture filtering therr. And they didn't.

[@VonWitSlits]

5:15 song??

[@MajorLukeTV]

I didn’t realize until now how terrifying the cacodemon and hell knights were in 2016, one not having eyes and the other having no pupil just an eye is scary

[@aarononeil9832]

Feels wrong to completely leave out Doom 64 and Doom 3

[@NeilusNihilus]

Yeah but Doom 3 wasn't Doom and Doom 64 no one played.

[@leo_the_v.3847]

​@@NeilusNihilusSpeak for yourself

[@NeilusNihilus]

@@leo_the_v.3847 I think I speak for everyone.

[@leo_the_v.3847]

@@NeilusNihilus You think. Well, you thought wrong.

[@NeilusNihilus]

@@leo_the_v.3847 No one knows Doom 64 except gog and it was good. Doom 3 was garbage in comoparison to 1 and 2.

[@TheRealJochen]

Why is texture filtering enabled for doom 1 and 2?

[@tulliorufini1753]

You miss all the demons in doom 3😢

[@K-kof2000]

Ugly versions

[@chaser1254]

2016 all the way. Wish they kept initial imp design from 2015 demo though. It was even more demonic.

[@asimplepie2279]

A mini hell knight basically

[@erikpng]

That one was waaaay too gray.

[@evanevans4469]

likely to be an unpopular opinion, but they really really dropped the ball on 2016 and Doom Eternal. The original designs are ambiguous in a way that feels genuinely uncanny and mysterious. The updated designs are not eerie at all they just look like monsters someone designed to look *cool* in a video game. Some of the Eternal designs feel closer to their original essence but overall still run into the same problem. They’re over-designed. FromSoftware somehow avoids this issue when they design monsters for games. The artistry gap is huge.

[@eternalfps3124]

I hope for Doom the Dark Ages, they go for a more primal look for the demons because the bright colors from Eternal definitely won’t work. 2016 definitely had the better design choices, still baffles me as to why they went an almost cartoon route with Eternal.

[@jennywatson2527]

Do you think that the mancubus in the new doom dark ages is a combination of the previous mancs like with the more rounder head of the doom 2 mancubus more of demonic technologie and more rotting like 2016 and the doom eternal manc skin tone

[@Deabru3]

Nice video! it would be amazing to see Doom 3 designs in the comparison

[@danilomannocchi]

Doom 3 has some of the best models...

[@jakemarcus9999]

Doom Eternal demons are closer to original. I really like that design choice

[@marianoluna7350]

Classic are more scary than the new CGI ones. They look like toys full of colors and lights

[@doodoostankman]

doom 2016 did a great deal on makin the demons scary while eternal payed more homage to the original. i like the classic demon looks in eternal but overall the demons in 2016 are graciously designed

[@filmowewyprawy]

Tbh I’m happy with just 1+2 but i appreciate the passion someone put to modernize the beloved franchise. Never felt I had to play nothing beyond 1+2 though

[@MelodicTurtleMetal]

Why have your applied some weird smoothing to the original sprites? They look blurry and worse

[@MaxUlf-e1k]

Why did you guys leave out doom3 ?

[@LootboxOfTruth]

In the original games the hell knight was basically just a brown baron that was a bit smaller and weaker werent they? There were slight differences in the model but not a lot from wut i saw

[@LootboxOfTruth]

@ph-fi7qo the doom 3 one mustve been decent if the 2016 and eternal ones turned out so good

[@Carlos-kh5qu]

​@lootbox9071 Doom 3 is the odd one among all Doom games, slow combat, dark enclosed corridors, "horror" elements

[@LootboxOfTruth]

@@Carlos-kh5qu i was talking about the model for the hell knight, not the gameplay

[@oldnelson4298]

Would be cool to see the comparison with Doom 3 included. It was 11 years after the original Doom and 13 years before Doom 2016, so almost right in the middle. I know people love to hate that game, but I always liked it. It was visually impressive at the time and, although a departure from the arcade nature of the original two Dooms, it was a good game and developed the story/lore.

[@GoldenDen21]

Classic, Perfect, something between

[@caclarkjr14]

I feel like the actual designs are kind of 50/50, here and there between 2016 and Eternal, but I do very much appreciate how Eternal's demons don't have such over-exaggerated, bouncy, cartoonish idle animations.

[@Jescooks]

Most of eternals models looked like the retro ones! SO COOL. I think there was like 2 or 3 of 2016 that looked closer to tbe orignial ones too.

[@camgeiger]

I like the art style of 2016 better even though Eternal respects the source material better. Everything from the DOOM guy down to the guns. I just like 2016 better, and I don't even play DOOM.

[@Jax49]

But why the demented filter

[@alejandrooro9932]

I never liked a lot the 3d versions. I fell that they should aim for a simplier style to be more realistic. Its just my preference

[@SURGEONAA2]

They look just fine, you’re just picky

[@Hyp3Active]

Doom 2016 demons look like bugs

[@chrisbingley]

It's somewhat hilarious how a 2D sprite, with all of 2 animation frames and 5 pixels looks better than the newer models.

[@kent6651]

Lol, what? No way. Doom 2016 looks the best, doom 2 is ok, but better than new ones for sure)

[@СтепанЛазарев-х7с]

Name of the last song?

[@strandburger6353]

I think it's Super Gore Nest from Eternal

[@darydot]

i like the eternal designs more cos of how much more cartoonish they are they look a lot less threatening and considering the doomslayer doesnt feel anywhere near threatened by them it feels like im seeing the world through his eyes

[@DwarvenMechCommando81]

I still wish they gave the HellKnight some kind of horns back. Like a little different from the Baron at least. They are both basically based on mythical Minotaur

[@K-kof2000]

Imp: good but could be all brown. Revenant: good but seems to have shrunk in Eternal. Knight: ugly in 2016 and a little better in Eternal, I like the original which is a lite version of Baron, I would like to see that maintained. Demon: perfect, in general the more stationary demons are more intimidating than in the "restless" version (2016). Cacodemon: I prefer the perfect meatball version, in the others he just looks old and withered, Eternal is a little better. Baron: Very good but I don't understand why he turned gray. Fatso; 2016: horrible, they even turned him into a cyclops. Eternal: perfect but he's a little pale. Soul: It doesn't make sense for him to be without fire in his head, Eternal is perfect. Cyberdemon: horrible in 2016, perfect in Eternal. Pain: Good. Arachnotron: Good but his skeletal face was reused for other demons, like Imp. Vile: Perfect. Mastermind: Perfect. C.Fatso: Horrible/cool but it's a bit weird that the chest armor moves like muscle.

[@Harry_Bahlzanya]

I really like the doom 1 mod with the 2016 models been enjoying that lately

[@erenatukeren3727]

As someone played the entire series Doom 2016 has the most fun among them

[@TeaTimeRumble]

Its a matter of taste, but i personally love the Eternal looks more, because they have all the character that the original sprites did 2016 is definitrly trying to fit a more "cohesive" unitifed design, but it takes alot of the charm out, especially on the Soliders, Mancubus, Cyberdemon, ect

[@RunningWormProd]

The cacodemon from eternal Is Crazy! Like that hyper realistic drawn creepy moments from ren and stimpy..i thing they got more original with 2016 but made the best choice for eternal to go back to the roots

[@aldorechiasson]

2016 looks so much better!

[@manuelgrothe608]

Blood, Guts and Dinner

[@Aegis4521]

I liked the red, fleshy aberration theme that 2016 had going on

[@stevenprice7531]

How come they did not do the monster from doom 64 and doom 3

[@mattschmerbeck8375]

Some of the Doom 2016 monsters, like the revenant, look more realistic than the cartoonish look of some of Eternals enemies.. Not sure why the changes were even made.

[@SURGEONAA2]

No one cares what you think, most of Eternal’s designs are an upgrade

[@feltycomic8558]

The original doom designs were trying to make something scary with what little technology they had at the time and doom 2016 does the same (but with better tech this time), but doom eternal harkins back to the originals but just ends up looking more cartoonish and goofy and I can't say I like it over the 2016 version.

[@TheLawnMowingMan]

Blud defo got nostalgia goggles on for 2016💀. Eternal is way better 🥱

[@feltycomic8558]

@@TheLawnMowingMan Nostalgia? I played it 5 years ago thats not nostalgia

[@feltycomic8558]

@@TheLawnMowingMan Plus I actually like doom eternal more but I just like the art direction of 2016 more

[@smgt4108]

​@@feltycomic8558 yeah they does

[@therealransu]

@@feltycomic8558 I agree, 2016's art focused more on atmosphere and immersion while Eternal had a more arcade-ish direction hence the designs of the demons being sort of less detailed.

[@libelli2695]

Why id software make cyberdemon like in original... 2016 is better...

[@Xerces1c]

in doom eternal the devs went to recreating the classic style demons and they remade cyberdemon from the classic doom and renamed it to tyrant

[@bigimp3018]

Because the cyberdemon in 2016 is already dead they literally cannot bring him back

[@BreadTeleporter1968]

Icl the tyrant looks way more unique than the bland cyberdemon

[@Xerces1c]

@@bigimp3018 lmao ye

[@JSmithski]

I finished Doom 1 and 2 again this year and I have to tell you these monsters are still terrifying

[@tcchip]

Wished you added Doom 64 and Doom 3 to the comparisons too.

[@Snake_2066]

OG Doom and Doom Eternal are both pretty good, but feel cartoony. Doom 2016 is a lot more realistic and gritty, and the models are also more detailed in a lot of respects. I get they likely had to pull back on model detail in Eternal due to performance constraints but there difference’s are there regardless.

[@Hammudiii]

Doom 64?

[@VALoco100]

Doom 2016 - Sci Fi; Doom Eternal - fantasy.

[@JDMEXforme]

Some designs from 2016 were better but overall Eternal is like a Nostalgic vibe. Plasma gun better too. The super shotgun field of depth looked better in 2016. Tyrant looks like the classic and Doom 64. DOOM64 is the most scariest doom.

[@lukaspodrazil9547]

I'm not even surprised that there are mods for doom 2. The same monsters but in better graphics. As with most games these days.

[@smelkus]

I hope Doom the dark ages includes all the variants of different demon types

[@Gzm-ci2pw]

The design of Eternal looks like a remake of the original which is good imo, and in 2016 they look more challenging.

[@DevilSpawnofHades]

When the Archvile sound came, i hear echos of me swearing 🤬

[@ahqasrawi]

Am I the only one that thinks the original doom from the 1990s had the coolest and scariest demons? May be its the lack of details that gives a psychological sense of horror

[@YTcmtr]

I was thinking the same. In doom2 there were demons, 2016 and eternal they are more like aliens. I don't remember well but doom3 I think kept more the original essence

[@maciejweiss55]

Doom 2016 monsters take first place without any doubts. Ethernal’s monsters look worse.

[@SURGEONAA2]

Terrible opinion

[@sheilaolfieway1885]

I really prefer the classic look especailly for the baron and hell knight the more goat look to the originals just sits better with me.

[@masonconnor7356]

Revenant hittin the stanky leg in doom ii

[@Pulang_Diwa]

I kinda wanted a Doom 3 comparison also.

[@krishanuphukan80]

Eternal kept the original design. 2016 just made them more scarier.

[@EdKolis]

I feel like the Eternal versions are more faithful to the original than 2016's are, but sometimes 2016 does them better...

[@MunkisManimal]

Don't get me wrong, I think the 2016 models were amazing, but eternal felt more faithful to the original

[@haroldlebron7348]

Soy yo o hay alguien más que le gusta más como se ven los demonios de Doom 2016 que los demas?

[@KalHadesman]

Yep! Me!

[@awesomebears]

Classic doom just warms my heart really 😂

[@Mbxstudios]

If ID still done the classic hell knite i think DOOM would have been more realistic than a bald srong grey armoured human against a imatating horned half human half goat beast

[@miguelangelmiranda8460]

Why would you exclude doom 3

[@arturkazak481]

Where’s Icon of Sin? You can compare from Doom 2 and Eternal

[@Colvalan410]

2D sprites were way more scary to play against

[@NOVABLASTER]

Doom has good design 2016 is also good in its own way, Eternal resembles the original design. (I mean some were more accurate in 2016 but)😊

[@azureblue29]

Now do one with Doom 64 please! It had unique models 🙏🏻😁

[@Tlohtzin123]

Doom Eternal looks like 343 Industries developed it

[@amberblackfire3872]

Why there is not Doom 3 ?