Alhamdulillah...I can't describe my inner self s literally shivering with new discoveries you are coming up with every video. Really I am in mixed feeling one way I am feeling deeply joyed with the correct meaning which is being revealed and in many ways I am shocked that the learning I had in last so many years through different scholars interpretation is gone so wrong and left me at stage of knowing nothing. I feel like crying ... thinking where we all are going with all corrupted interpretation...not sure still how much wrong ideologies we have kept deep inside.Really worried now where I am standing in sight of Allah. Please publish your complete interpretation soon sir. Thanks again..keep us enlightening.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Wallahi my brother! I am doing nothing else beside this mission. It is a beautiful burden I take on with great pleasure! Even though it much more than the work of just one person, I continue working on it as much as I can. Insha Allahh we will be allowed to continue the mission and to succeed. The mission is to wrestle our Quran back from the hands of those who did not do it justice! Your sincere Duaa (all of you) is desperately needed. The feeling of sickness and despair and fear that you described are all part of the detoxification process. Convert these feelings into an iron-steel will to engage the Quran, directly. Never let anyone detract you from your one-on-one relationship with The Creator!
@AMRB-9993 жыл бұрын
I too felt the same, mixed emotions and shared in many other UT channels and when I found deleted, too much of frustration and sadness. May Allahh SWT unite our ummah to right path and seek guidance.
@FA0693 жыл бұрын
@@AMRB-999 I am very hopeful brother...True believers who are seeking will embrace correct understanding soon Inshallah. A lot depends upon our own characters and intentions. However Allah himself has written Majority will be misguided it is true for all times. We should be alarmed with beliefs which majority is carrying. It seems Allah is not interested in quantity but quality.
@AMRB-9993 жыл бұрын
@@FA069 True Brother, there's a hadith saying that 999 out of 1000 enter the hellfire, means overwhelming majority....but I don't know the authenticity of this Hadith.
@FA0693 жыл бұрын
@@AMRB-999 snippet of surah Anaam 6:116 And if you obey most of those upon the earth, they will mislead you from the way of Allah. They follow not except assumption, and they are not but falsifying. This should be enough rather than going into authenticity of hadith.
@Yahya___2 жыл бұрын
Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 0:33 In This Segment 2:19 We Assume That You Understand 3:05 Reminder of the Difference Between رَءا and رأى 4:10 Gift #1: Difference Between رُءْيَا and رُءْيَـٰى 13:32 Gift #2: How A.L Term Were Taught to Ibrāhīm? 19:31 Sūrah Aṣ-Ṣāf-fāt (Sūrah 37:107-113) 51:37 Gift #3: What was the Age of the Young Man? 52:44 Gift #4: Was There a Great Ram? 57:10 Gift #5: Who was the Young Man in this Story? 59:24 Gift #6: Why do we Refer to “Abrahamic Locution”? 1:03:45 Outro
@MarvelousQuran2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much. Uploaded.
@AliAbdulrahman-k8n Жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah salamoun alaykum this knowledge has really changed everything in me as it opens all my past misconceptions ❤ this dua of lisaan swidqin 3aliyya
@sabihashaikh61803 жыл бұрын
Your sincere attempt at trying to analyze our blessed book is commendable.jazakallah khairun for steering us to reflect on the teachings of our holy book.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
You too
@eliaskondi1722 Жыл бұрын
A very detailed, convincing and insightful lecture. Thank you, Dr. Hany
@atifali39412 жыл бұрын
Watching this episode again after a few months and after going through all the previous videos I can say that this truth sticks to the core, Alhamdullilah. I should also mention that through these videos my linguistics skills from having basically no knowledge of arabic and the abrahamic locution has improved and the meaning of these words stick in my head with little effort (YAZZAKR MAYBE?). The duas mentioned in the Quran have become these little learning nuggets were I can start to understand the language even though I am a non arabic speaker.
@katongolehakeem34222 жыл бұрын
Rematch and attain more understanding, I had missed alot of information before and Insha Allahh I believe if I rewatch again, Allahh will show me more evidence. Thank you so much Dr Hany.
@snazriahify3 жыл бұрын
Masyaallah tabarakallah, all the uneasy facts I used to be told that I questioned and refused to agree is debunked each time I watched your videos. Jazakallah u Khairan Kathiran
@semracalik3040Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah, l am in awe with the precision and beauty of the Quran. Very touching segment for me
@aldiwrds45993 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah..it's like I'm trying to play a picture puzzle and the more I get from your presentation the more visible the picture..may Allah keep us always on the straight path...aminn Ya Rabbal alamin
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah. It only gets better insha Allahh
@mapenzizuleikha38432 жыл бұрын
Salamu Alekumu brother Allahh reward for your work it was great ilove how you teaching us, how you translate The Qur'an Allahh make you to be our leader
@sheikhrishad8793 жыл бұрын
Amazing Dr. Hany.... The whole segment was filled with so much brilliant information.... Thanks...
@md.abuzafar97513 жыл бұрын
Excellent and almost perfect findings. May Allah bless and guide all of us in way of searching truth especially Dr. Hany for his hard and sincere work in the journey of searching truth.
@stochasticxalid98533 жыл бұрын
Baraka Allahu fika dear brother. It's such a blessing stumbling upon your channel.
@muhammadalisiddiqui8039Ай бұрын
In 12:43, after INNI, There's ARA, how did you skip it? What does this word mean here?
@MarvelousQuranАй бұрын
I did not skip it. Watch again. It means "I see"
@muhammadalisiddiqui8039Ай бұрын
@MarvelousQuran could be good to mention it when you said "two/both" Similar for blaaa"
@benadam47363 жыл бұрын
@Marvelous Quran Salam Dr. Hany, you seem to suggest that Isma3il was not Ibrahim son (peace be upon them both). If that's so, then how do you explain Ayah 14:39 which seems to imply that both Isma3il and Ishaq were Ibrahim's sons (peace be upon them all)?
@fairooslebbe30003 жыл бұрын
Alhamthu Lillah Every segments are spreading the true message. When I was reading translations for this part of Quran really I was confused. I was unable to accept fully. Now it's cleared. I wonder why the other ulamas are silent. Thank you so much Dr Hany for your hard work with the intention of educating us(ummah) with corrected knowledge. Insha Allah The Almighty Allah with you. I feel He has chosen you for this work.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah... We are ALL chosen by Allahh. Allahh wants to communicate with ALL of us!
@awabaghan59433 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah and thank you Dr. Hany and team.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@TinyArtsofLife3 жыл бұрын
jazakumallahukhair for posting this video. it solved my doubts regarding submission, sacrifice and all. plz post like these type of videos as proper knowledge people are limited and sharing these benefits many. mashallah
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Insha Allahh. Keep watching
@TinyArtsofLife3 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran I have a doubt, if the young man was Issac(pbuh) then who is Ismail (pbuh) where he was mentioned many times in the translations of online Qur'an and in the hadeeths too 🤔
@azadehamighi96083 жыл бұрын
thank you for your such hard work and correct me with new information to get rid of all those nonsense. Allah be with you.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@munahassen48153 жыл бұрын
Noo upon noor. Mashallah it's amazing to hear, feel and test truth. May Allah bless you
@falahis2762 Жыл бұрын
The video is insightful and well researched. This leaves me and lot of people confused as expected.. My question is the annual Hajj include sacrifices of animals. You are saying now it is not necessary?? What about the Hadith when beloved Muhammad PBAB performed Hajj and we were told he slaughtered a lot of camels 🐪 !! Although we are confused, we are learning a lot . Alhamdulilah & thanks 🙏
@mohammadjavid3066 Жыл бұрын
Each time I go back to these early segments I notice there was lot I missed before.
@babsandj Жыл бұрын
I’m grateful and thankful that my desire and hunger for knowledge lead me to Dr Hany.
@KlingPuteh3 жыл бұрын
I seriously don’t know what to follow anymore. Should I just wait for Marvellous Quran to complete all the translations to know which are right and which are wrong? 😔
@yeyo42813 жыл бұрын
Allah gives direct guidance remember? We don't need Dr. Hany, we need Allah. It's Allah who guides you, but maybe we feel like we only receive when we watch these videos. Think of it this way, maybe we learn so much more watching these videos because we come to these videos trying to learn. Not because Allah is limited to guiding us only when we're watching the videos.
@wanaishahwanhamid80753 жыл бұрын
Thank you Brother Hany Atchan AlKhidr……..the meeting of the two seas, ALHAMDULILLAH. May Allah S.W.T rewards you in abundance. Forever indebted. Wasalam
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
No sister. I am just a lowly delivery person bringing what Allahh is making accessible to me, to others to share Please watch this video about the fact that there is No Khidr kzbin.info/www/bejne/jIHdg2SCmpucfbM
@wanaishahwanhamid80753 жыл бұрын
What I mean is you’re given ‘milladunna ilma’! So you are that ‘person’ to me Dr Hany, Alhamdulillah. Understood about Khidr InshaAllah. I’ve listened to all your videos many of which repeatedly including the ones under Hany Atchan, Alhamdulillah. Wasalam
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much. I appreciate the sentiments... But Plz do not elevate me beyond what I say I am. I am a simple seeker who is blessed by Allahh with certain abilities, and therefore I am choosing to put these abilities in service to the final message from Allah! I carry so many sins and I have made so many mistakes, and I only hope that I can make up a little bit before I die, perchance I receive the mercy from my lord! Regards
@ahmedtijanitanko25343 жыл бұрын
Jazakhallahukhairan Dr. so far this videos that i am well convinced among all your videos.8
@mohammedanwar47762 жыл бұрын
An extremely diverted concept according to the practice of the society since long ago but Alhamdulillah we reached to the fact by up lifting the layer of understanding.
@WajidAli-qy2tc3 жыл бұрын
God bless you dr sahib Great toiling through scripture on ur part sir
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
You too Sahib
@di9un3 жыл бұрын
Salaam Dr, If the first son mentioned in verse (35:100-103) is Ishaq, why Allah do not mention his name like He mention it in next verse (35:112)? Is this indicating that, both persons are different person? Thank you.
@ode-kmurphytv96293 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your efforts in giving a very humanly convincing explanation to the Quran and related verses. I'm of opinion that this another tafsr, which may be declared diof or accepted depending on the intelligent, schorlastic knowledge or theological compression of an individual.
@elmubarak823 жыл бұрын
Jazakallah khair dr hany!! This is yet another great video! I learned a lot - although I want to highlight that tabari also of the opinion that the son in the ayat was ishaq
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Many other scholars stated the same!
@nihany74602 ай бұрын
Sir, I don't know how to thank you. May Allah our Lord the Allmighty bless you in this life and beyond.
@PakistaniHomemakerInCanada2 жыл бұрын
But it clearly says qad saddaqta ro'yaa.... there is no "wrong" mentioned in the ayah?
Salaamun alaikum Dr. Hany. Alhamdulillah! What an awesome lecture. I need to empty my cup and re-write schema... Jazakallahu Khairan.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@mo96313 жыл бұрын
Thanks again for another insightful lecture Dr. Hany. Is it possible to get a (uneditable) copy of the notes you use in your videos? I often re-watch the videos to reinforce my understanding, and it would be easier to have the notes to refer back to (and scribble my own notes next yours), instead of trying to locate the part I am looking for in the video. Thanks again, looking forward to future videos.
@zainuddin44543 жыл бұрын
SalaamunAlaykum Dr Hany, You said that Ishaq was the first son but in surah Ibrahim verse 39 , of the two sons, the name Ismail is mentioned first as if implying that Ismail was the eldest. Your enlightment please. TQ.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
We will deal with it when we discuss Issma3il insha Allahh
@alangzainab243 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran looking forward to this, thank you.
@gunsz773 жыл бұрын
Would you explain how the verse قد صدقت الرؤيا translated into what you show us in the video? Because i couldnt find any relation or indicator that showing me that meaning.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
"You have accepted the opinion". i.e., the opinion given by the son Iss-haaq.
@dbr2953 жыл бұрын
Respected brother, what do you make of the spelling variations? For example, Ibrahm (without the "ya") & Ibraheem (with the "ya")?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
You noticed. Masha Allahh. These variations are showing several things including: - Ibrahim was changing as he learned more and more - Ibrahim became "many" , which is the "im" suffix added to his name Allahu A3lam
@samiabousaleh21463 жыл бұрын
@@rizwanshaukat5654 You are a raging Noahide. "Those who spend during prosperity and adversity, hold their anger and forgive others. Allah loves those who do good" (3:134) Don't jump to conclusions and be patient
@shirazrehmani6453 жыл бұрын
@@rizwanshaukat5654 Dear Brother Rizwan Shaukat I appreciate your frank participation in commenting. Since we are discussing serious matters pertaining to our beloved scripture, the Quran would it not be more appropriate to use civil language? i believe it would only give more credibility to your argument. As you know we have been coached by the Quran to use beautiful language when discussing matters of religion. Thank you for understanding. May Allah SWT bless you.
@mksajid3492 Жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah very nice vedeo allah aapki Umar me darazi kare or aap or achhe vedeo dale
@abdullahothman76833 жыл бұрын
Tq sir..for the vedio..give me new knowledge of quran.really waiting for ur next vedio..
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Insha Allahh
@avastamin2 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah. May Allah mercy on us. I have a question sheikh, If Darood-e Ibrahim isn't part of any surah in the Quran then how it became part of our Salah?
@pa237083 жыл бұрын
Interesting explanation. Dr. How can I get the Quran translation you are using ?
@Anbu04-lc7ty4 ай бұрын
Where is the video you talked about Quran 5:94 5:95 5:96 Reply please
@jaitonghani3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah Aamiin MaasyaAllah thank you Sir awaiting for more… path are getting clearer and brighter now😊
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@SxetehakhBettehakh3 жыл бұрын
Totally confusing. 1. Ibrahim had a dream. 2. A dream where he saw him slaughtered his son. 3. He exposed his dream to his son. 4. Son took it as an obedient son as a command from Allah and surrendered himself in the hands of father. 5. When Ibrahim began the process of slaughter. Angles stoped him. I failed to understand what your explanation is pointed at. How his son gave a wrong opinion. How he was supposed to respond.? 1. If Ibrahim according to your interpretation took it otherwise. What Ibrahim was supposed to do. Slaughter his son without telling him anything. 2. If dream meant something else not slaughter of his son. Then why angles didn’t correct Ibrahim. I am not satisfied with the story as it’s told and understood unless dream of Ibrahim had totally different objective which btw angles didn’t clear at all.
@pixionsoft3 жыл бұрын
Don't follow this guy. This guy is misleading everyone. Stick to the Quran and Sunnah.
@adrianabonitaaziz3 жыл бұрын
@@othmanahmad7331 How can you leave the messenger if you are flowing the message ? 🤔
@adrianabonitaaziz3 жыл бұрын
@@othmanahmad7331 There is no god but God ☝️.
@mejamakan30543 жыл бұрын
@@othmanahmad7331 @ an academic opinion must be counter with an academic opinion…. if you dont hv it better not make a statement
@syedsawar3 жыл бұрын
I agree with you, lecture is not justify properly, it was hard try to connect everything to the methodalogy.
@zaksamzaksam54273 жыл бұрын
ALHAMDULILAH....may ALLAH grant you more and more courage sir....I m scared to talk about this concept to my mom who is so close to me I don't know how do you do it right in front of the whole world ...MAY ALLAH TALA bless you with more SALAAM and RASOOLALLAH (pbuh) meet you with a big smile on his face and pat your back... Imagine eyes filled with tears of joys...heart filled with overwhelming amount of happiness... and ALLAH SWT telling you FADQU LII FEE IBAADI...WAD QULII JANNATII.. SUBHAN ALLAH!!
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
He who heads towards Allahh, exclusively, has nothing to fear from any of Allahh's creatures. Insha Allahh, you and I and all subscribers on this channel will have this outlook towards Allahh alone! (Waj-hallahh) If you read this, say Aameen
@zaksamzaksam54273 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran AMEEN
@meru75913 жыл бұрын
People have followed Ibrahim (aly) and revel in the love of Allah subhanatAala till now.. Unlimited blessings of Allah subhanatAala keep showering on them..
@syedasimali6683 жыл бұрын
Thanks for several enlightening observations. However, you should also have pointed out the word for slaughter in Arabic and how ذبح should be understood in ان تذبحوا بقرہ. Plus, if یذبحون means castration and not killing, how would you justify its parallel expression یستحیون نسائھم. Had you done that, your argument would have appeared more complete and convincing. Thanks
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
You are right my brother! But the video would have been 2 hours. These details are important and they are coming in futures segments insha Allahh Thanks you Regards
@yusufk52983 жыл бұрын
Salams Dr Hany, why do you say the locution includes Ibrahim, Ishaq and yaqub AS when the verse only refers to "them"?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Look at the preceding aya
@sabahkapadia59973 жыл бұрын
Asalāmu’alaikim Sir, Today’s informative translation is mind boggling, as we Muslims have been sacrificing animals in the name of Allah in remembrance of the deed performed by prophet Abraham. With all due respect, Please highlight the truth behind celebrating Eid-al Adha across the universe by Muslims . Sincere Regards.🙏🏻
@harleyfreeriderzynra95543 жыл бұрын
Dear Dr, Would you please use the Quranic methodology to explain verse 56 of Surat Al-Ahzab!
@imtiazchaudhary89742 жыл бұрын
استغفراللہ۔ May Allah save us from the whispers of Satan and direct us to the right path
@abdullahothman76833 жыл бұрын
askm..Could u interprate surah al kaustar 108:2 .does this ayat mention about slaughtering or its means other thing..
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
It talks about slaughtering. But what we discussed in the video is only focused on the mythological story of God challenging Ibrahim to test him, and then angels bringing down a great ram as a sacrifice. All we said was that this story is mythology and has nothing to do with the Quran. It was imported from the corrupt version of the Torah Slaughtering animals for legitimate consumption and for charity is a legitimate matter. No one denied that! Regards
@abdullahothman76833 жыл бұрын
Tq for ur reply..im really folowing ur vedio..so is this ayat relate 108:2 is about qurban on haj..eid adha where we pratice now..or its is wrongly translate...tq
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
It's a general encouragement to do charity. No specific event tied to it.
@MaanayShah7863 жыл бұрын
DO YOU HAVE A COURSE THAT CAN BE TAKEN TO START ON THE JOURNEY YOU ARE ON?
@semracalik30402 жыл бұрын
Selam sir, is it then by this event that male circumcision become an obligation for Muslim men? So ibrahim (as) was not circumcised? 🙏🤲
@nuddeensultan56783 жыл бұрын
Salam Dr Hany, please explain your interpretation of what Nabi Ibrahim saw in his dream, did he saw a document with the "word" incision or the "word" slaughter,, or did he saw the actual act of performing the incision or the slaughter? Can you explain how a Nabi and Rasul could not interpret a word correctly; and you can? And how thousands of scholars got it wrong and you somehow got it right ?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Answers were clearly provided. Please watch again and carefully. I promise you, your questions are valid, but we already answered them
@zainuddin44543 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran You mentioned that wahy is a specific intruction or specific command from Allah and a dream can be a wahy as understood by Ibrahim's son. As such the vision/dream of the cutting must have been clear. If that is so why Ibrahim, the father of prophets who had full wisdom could wrongly interpret his dream and concur with his teenage son opinion who was still in the learning process. Your interpretation on this needs solid evidence.
@khulutparveen29533 жыл бұрын
As-salamu-alaikum sir. I am absolutely convinced with your explanation. But then what's the reason of celebrating eid ul adha?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
We are simply focusing on the erroneous story attributed to these verses by the books of Tafseer. We did not discuss Hajj or Eid or even the practice of slaughtering and distributing animals.
@ultiumlabs48993 жыл бұрын
This tafseer is different with other tafseers by previous scholars. So, it's not small thing in islamic world, especially they're giants in their field (tafseer), hundreds or even thousands of scholars agreed upon their commentaries, and I'm sure it's not just blind belief. I hope you could propose it to other scholars in Egypt, in Saudi, in Mauritania, in Yaman, etc so they can look and comment at this if it is right or wrong, at least if they're agree or not. as a mere muslim I can't judge you with my limited knowledge of islam.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Please watch this segment to learn more: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gH-nk6effbijaa8
@muhdkamilmohdbaki7054 Жыл бұрын
Salaamun Alaykum, I was re-watching this video again and towards the end, about why it is called Lisana Ibrahim, the supplication of Ibrahim is told in 26:84. I think the fullfillment of the supplication is mentioned in the beginning of the video kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJnEmY2HdrabY5o Surah Al-Baqarah 2:124 because of the word "Kalimatin". "Kalimat" means the fulfillment of supplication as per with 3issa ibn Maryam if I am not mistaken.
@deno82653 жыл бұрын
I hope you can add subtitles in each video
@AMRB-9993 жыл бұрын
For subtitles, click the 3 dots icon in the right hand side and go to captions for English subtitles.
@basrialimi65573 жыл бұрын
Doctor, what about verse 112: we gave you glad tidings Ishaq. Many Scholars are saying that the son is Ismail due to after the incident then Allah revealed the Glad Tiding. I hope you can continue interpretation until this verse to avoid confusion. Tq
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
112 is giving the glad tidings of Iss-Haaq becoming a prophet
@basrialimi65573 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran tq doctor
@AMRB-9993 жыл бұрын
Please take note the quality of the recording, the sound system.... there's a slight variation some sort of shrilling sound in the previous and the current segments too. Your analysis must reach everyone.... Thank you.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Noted. Working on it! Limited resources unfortunately. Thank you
@MrSaliheenm3 жыл бұрын
Amazing twist in the story. Radically different from the traditional story which we used to here. According to Bible also it was Isaac who was attempted slaughter. Now I also twisted.
@nisarahmad3851Ай бұрын
Great explanation ❤
@sthelojasimelane94533 жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr, it's so beautiful to hear different opinions. But to be on a safer side spiritually, I will not confuse myself with man made locutions and so on. I will recite the verses of ALLAH the way my Lord has revealed them to HIS noble Messenger.The Locution will be done my Lord from whom the revelation came from. And I will wait for that. LA ILAHA ILALLAH
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
All the evidence we present is from the Quran. This locution is the divine lexicon
@mohammadjavid3066 Жыл бұрын
Great
@Alex214413 жыл бұрын
How can we determine whether or not the Prophet alayhi salaam and the sahaba understood as you have?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Let me ask the question in a different way. What if we don't have enough reliable evidence that they did or did not understand it the way we explain it? Does that mean that we stop and don't try to understand?
@wasay4562 жыл бұрын
Salam Alaikum. I have a question (I did watch the entire episode) about this but more generally towards similar discussions: How a distinction that is only discernable by writing makes sense in a book (and a culture) that is mainly oral? in this case the meanings are close enough that we can't reliably differentiate the meaning by context alone. Surely given the potential for confusion, a divine message would avoid such usage? I am not a native Arabic speaker but given the breadth of the language, there will have to be a better choice of words that would communicate the idea with clarity? I see three possibilities: 1. The choice and hence the confusion is deliberate. It servers a purpose for a vast number of Muslims to have believed that it was a dream (not sure what). 2. The word has single usage for the first-row audience (Meccans). In other words, if I yelled "Ro'Yaa" in a Meccan market, what would be implied? regardless of locution. 3. It was intended to be the meaning you suggest but given the unfortunate circumstances of being Oral(most people couldn't read anyways) and going against the commonly held definition, it got lost in translation so to speak. #3 makes me very uncomfortable because it has profound implications.
@MarvelousQuran2 жыл бұрын
You are arguing that the spelling of the Quran is haphazardly done... That's your choice... We (and many other very serious researchers) keep proving otherwise. But don't assume that, when you ask a question to which YOU don't have an answer, then that means that THERE IS NO ANSWER... Most of your assumptions above are unfounded (such as the Meccans were the first-row audience for the Quran)... Surprise! They were not. The Meccans were only mentioned in a very short 4-aya surah... There is much that we were taught that was simply not true!
@meneliktaseti3 жыл бұрын
Aslm alkm Dr Hany..... you have been very emphatic on not adding anything to the Quran that is not specifically there.....so in this video when you refer to the locution as for Ibrahim,Ishaq and Yakub, is that explicitly mentioned in the ayah or it is from your tafsir please?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Explicitly mentioned sir! We translated the aya in the video. The preceding aya is very clearly talking about all 3 of them.
@admirkacamakovic21203 жыл бұрын
Did prophet Muhammad (pbuh) sacrifice an animal before he died (for Eid)?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Valid question... But it has nothing to do with what we discussed... This video is NOT talkinig about whether animal slaughtering is allowed. It's debunking a mythological story that was imported from the corrupted version of the Torah. Regards
@badarhabib3 жыл бұрын
It appears that it was Ishaq and not Ismael who was involved in this event. Please correct me if I am wrong.
@MrNewcook3 жыл бұрын
I don’t get it. How come anyone change the meaning of the word “saddaqtaa” ………!!!!
@rasheedareejo3 жыл бұрын
Aslam Alaikum doctor. Jazak Allah khair for your effort. In my opinion there will be disconnect between Yusuf:43 and Yusuf:44 and subsequent verses if your methodoly is followed. According to your explanation of verse 43, the king didnt dream rather he is referring to an eye-witness report and asking his courtiers to help him with opinion-building But in the following verse, king’s courtiers reply that these are meaningless “dreams” and they have no knowledge of “dream interpretation”. Word أرَاىٰني is used by two prisoners in verse 36 and it refers to dream. Your clarification on these points will be appreciated.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
As we said in the video, kzbin.info/www/bejne/iGHSgJhsbNCnfrs plz do NOT assume that you know the rest of the story. Watch other videos such as this one kzbin.info/www/bejne/oofQYppshb-Jq5Y Regards
@mohammedabubakar60213 жыл бұрын
Sir , you can't change the tafseer of the old scholars
@moedot72 жыл бұрын
Hold the phone! What where how?! I've got so many questions. Then where did we get the practice of slaughtering an animal after Hajj from? Dr Hany, great work!
@tracyrussell45613 жыл бұрын
Mashallah I am really enjoying your videos having recently discovered them. I am confused with Surah 47 verse 31 because the root word بلؤ was used in both instances in this verse, but you have translated one as tribulation and the other as expose; however, you said in your explanation that tribulation root word is بلاء . Could you please clarify?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
@ Tracy Russell The root بلو indicates "to expose". When it is used in the sense of tribulation, it serves that purpose. But when the Quran uses ابتلى or its derivatives, it is referring to teaching, or to expose new information.
@AMRB-9993 жыл бұрын
Finally this Quranic story is the marking of chapter 22:52 Abrogation in the mental framework.....
@Farlid578683 жыл бұрын
Dr Hanny, is it a coincidence that slaughtering is translated as dub (sounds like دبح to me) in the Sumerian Lexicon with a reference to “knock down or smash” (وتله للجبين), check this: dúb, túb: to kick, flop (said of fish, newborn animals, and slaughtered animals); to strike, hammer, knock down; to (make) tremble, quake; to rumble [DUB2 archaic frequency: 2]. Jazakallah
@aldamierjulkarnain39353 жыл бұрын
My take on the story of Ibrahim and Ismail is that this story reflects the principle of "Intellectual Test". The story rejects the notion that age of maturity is based on physical changes in a person (boy - voice, mustache, beard..etc or girl-menstruation etc), but instead based it on intellectual maturity. The story also puts the standard to the nature of question to be asked to ascertain whether a person has attained maturity and the standard of answer required from the person.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Very nice interpretation my brother (or sister)
@samiabousaleh21463 жыл бұрын
السلام عليكم I still don't understand the point of circumcision because Allah says : "وصوركم فأحسن صوركم" (40:64) and "لقد خلقنا الإنسن في أحسن تقويم" (95:4) ?Is there a more direct Quranic explaination
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Salamun Alaykum If you understand that we are assigned the responsibility of completing our spiritual and intellectual formation, you would understand the symbolism of circumcision, especially for males. The ayats that you mentioned does not say that you were completed. They just state that your images were selected by Allahh. A woman's body goes through several changes. A man's body also changes. And the single symbol that Allahh prescribed upon males is the circumcision as a prevalent reminder of the necessity to "trim" one's excessiveness.
@samiabousaleh21463 жыл бұрын
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Allah never chose the Jews (62:6-8). Grow up Noahide.
@samiabousaleh21463 жыл бұрын
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Get out of here Noahdie. This is a page for studying Holy Quran. We dont accept a letter from your Zionist Torah. You are Esau, the soldier of Jacob. You come here trying to preach your garbage when you believe in blood magic (Leviticus 16,17 and Hebrews 9:2) and how the Jews (Who are marked by Allah with their beak-noses) are the "Children" of god (Romans 9:4). You are a slave to Zion seeking to spread your false gospel of self-destruction (Matthew 10:16) so that the strong Arabs and Muslims surrender to Israel and stay praying at home fror some Jewish guy to save us who couldn't even show up when he was supposed to (Matthew 24:34). Go back to your Sanhedrin and tell your Rabbis there (Revelations 5) that WE WILL NEVER SURRENDER TO ISRAEL. So go take your filthy ideology someplace else with your god who is a servant of the Jews (Romans 15:8). The Jews subjugated all of Europe with Christianity which helped them tale Jerusalem just when they wanted to (Go check out Torah gem-atria) AND THEY WILL NOT DO THE SAME WITH THE ARABS WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT! Now go into your victimization corner and tell yourself how "Everyone hates Christians" and how we "Hate the truth". Thats all you and your Jewish brethren are good at. Crying in a corner about how everyone hates you. GROW UP!
@samiabousaleh21463 жыл бұрын
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Don’t lecture me on your Bible Noahide Deuteronomy 14:2 For you are a holy people to the Lord your God, and the Lord has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. Deuteronomy 7:6 For you are a holy people to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. Romans 11:1 I say then, God has not rejected His people, has He? May it never be! For I too am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected His people whom He foreknew.
@ableskill Жыл бұрын
Amazing interpretation Alhumdulilah. Now it leaves with more questions, why do then people throw pebbles at the shaitan during Hajj ? So, if it wasn’t a Ram then why are we celebrating Ram slaughter i.e (EID)??
@benadam47363 жыл бұрын
Most mufassareen argue that (غُلَامٍ حَلِيمٍ) is referred to Prophet Isma3il (AS) and therefore he is the young man mentioned in Ayah (37:102 and 37:103). Although I find no other Ayah in Quran referring to Prophet Isma3il (AS) as (“حَلِيمٍ”). He is not even mentioned by name in this story under discussion which is supposed to be about his sacrifice according to the mufassireen. Therefore, I find your conclusion that it was actually Prophet Ishaq (AS) and not Prophet Isma3il (AS) far more convincing. However, I have one question, if you would be kind enough to answer to clear my mind: Prophet Ishaq (AS) is referred to as (غُلَامٍ عَلِيمٍ) in Ayah 15:53 (also referring to Ayah (9:71)), why does Allah (SWT) refer to him as (غُلَامٍ حَلِيمٍ) in Ayah (37:101), as well as (غُلَامٍ عَلِيمٍ) in Ayah 15:53?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Most Mufassiroon have not restricted their knowledge to only the Quran. They freely import their stories from corrupted versions of earlier scriptures and claim that they are from the Quran! On this channel, we base our knowledge exclusively on what Allahh told us, and we accept the Quranic truth with evidence, even if the vast majority of "scholars" disagree.
@benadam47363 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran You didn't answer my question about why Allah (SWT) refers to Prophet Ishaq (AS) as (غُلَامٍ حَلِيمٍ) in Ayah (37:101), as well as (غُلَامٍ عَلِيمٍ) in Ayahs (15:53) and (51:28). How did you you conclude that (غُلَامٍ حَلِيمٍ) is not Prophet Isma3il (AS)? Or will you cover all this in your forthcoming video on Prophet Isma3il (AS)?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
@ BenAdam In due time my friend. Be patient. I was just pointing out that you based your question in your original comment on wrong assumptions that are not supported by the facts of the Quran Regards
@Zarghaam123 жыл бұрын
Thank you for another very interesting lecture! But one thing I still have trouble with, and cannot get my head around it. If the word ذِبۡح means just a small incision, how does that all fit in with these: verses 107 and 108. I esp. have a problem with verse 107 with this interpretation. What is Allah ransoming and how, if this is just a small incision and not, say, a sacrifice? وَفَدَيۡنَـٰهُ بِذِبۡحٍ عَظِيمٍ۬ (١٠٧) وَتَرَكۡنَا عَلَيۡهِ فِى الۡأَخِرِينَ (١٠٨) I do, however, agree that the idea of the ram comes from the Old Testament and there is no direct indication in the verses for that.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
The verb "Fadaynahu" literally means "to swap". So ransom is perhaps what's causing the difficulty in understanding. But the idea is to substitute one thing (the incision ordered by the angels after they stopped Ibrahim) for the slaughter which Ibrahim was about to go through.
@idreeskhan23602 жыл бұрын
Great. It means Eid ul Azha sacrifice of animals is a tradition , and not an enjoinment by the Almighty. Strange too. Sometimes I would ponder as to how the most merciful God may order His Khulq to be treated like that except so required by other Khulq. Yet traditional theologians advocate. Perplexing.
@mohammadyousuf35803 жыл бұрын
Is the name ismaeel as son of ibrahim and hajar mentioned anywhere in quran
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Ismaeil is mentioned. Hajar is NOT. Ismail being the son of Ibrahim is NOT mentioned. I know that some people claim it was, but that's not true! Who was Ismail, then? We will deal with this issue in a future video. Regards
@nasermahmood79913 жыл бұрын
Can you please make a video on the meaning of ruh and nafs. Are they the same? Which one will be punished in hellfire? Etc......
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Insha Allahh. Very important
@abinehdikra3763 жыл бұрын
Shocking!!! I've put it all in my glass, but haven't decided to drink it yet... Rabbii, Ar-Rahmaan Ar-Rahiim, show us "Ash-Shiraat Al-Mustaqiim"..... Anyway, thanks for all of your effort on this presentation. May Allaah guide us to the right path.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Insha Allahh
@sadiyazh3 жыл бұрын
Salam Dr. Hany! How do you translate ayah 7:141? Please explain
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Before Mussa came to Fir3aoun as a prophet/messenger, Fir3aoun used to castrate the men and take them away as slaves After Mussa started bringing signs and causing damage to the economy and to Fir3aoun's reputation and power base, Fir3aoun retaliated by killing the men, for, it would be better for him to kill them instead of sending them away with Mussa.
@sadiyazh3 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran thank you!
@exhaleinhale11183 жыл бұрын
Dr. Hany. Thanks so much. Please what clarification do you have for Quran 2:125 and 2:127 that Ibrahim was mentioned with Ismael only without isshaq? With duties such as raising the House of the Lord. Is there anything else from these verses to negate Ismael not being the first son? P:s I believe all you said in this video about Isshaq. I’m only looking to see if there is more proof to show. Or who was Ismael? Thanks Dr.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
When we discuss the story of Ismail, insha Allahh
@exhaleinhale11183 жыл бұрын
@@MarvelousQuran Thank you Dr Hany. Insha Allah...
@skidachilles37493 жыл бұрын
Waiting for the explanation of the relationship between prophet Ismail, Ibrahim, and Ishaq.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Soon insha Allahh. But we have a few more concepts that are needed before we get to that!
@Arrazi133 жыл бұрын
I want to know about that too.
@RajaAzmanRajaAwang3 жыл бұрын
Thank you again Dr. This shocking to me😔. I am curious, are there any of those celebrity scholars interested in your work? I really hope that you will answer "Yes! some of them are supporting my work"
@truth.venture3 жыл бұрын
None, he is a deviant. He is negating all ulama in the past by interpreting in this way. He changed almost all quaran meaning.
@ultiumlabs48993 жыл бұрын
what do you mean by "celebrity scholar" ? , I think "islamic scholars" is more appropriate.
@yasfi51963 жыл бұрын
YES. The human sacrifices is one of symbols from paganistic rituals since the ancient history. The Christian has been using Bible's corrupted naration of Abraham and Isaac to justify Jesus crucifixion and "God die for our sins" doctrin. Since Islam came to defy these kind of act, how on earth God commanded His beloved Prophet to make sacrifice with a human-being?! In my opinion it's total blasphemy to Allah Azza wa' Jalla. Thanks for tackling this issue, Dr.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
Well said
@yasfi51963 жыл бұрын
@@seekthetruthandthetruthwil2388 Hold on a second.. So god provides "god" (the son = god according trinity) to god (himself).. Am i mistaken?
@farjanabanu22753 жыл бұрын
JazakhumAllah khairan brother for the video to ponder. I have a doubt in the translation of verse 47:31. The word ولنبلونكم has been translated as tribulation but the same word at the end ونبلو is translated as expose. I am quite confused. Could u pls clarify brother. And also could u tell me how to study the Abrahamic locution in order to understand the Quran properly. Any resources or references will be grateful. Your videos are mind blowing and I really appreciate your work. May Allah guide all of us to the right path aameen.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
We explained that there are 2 different "نبلو": one meaning "tribulation"; the second meaning "to expose". Generally, the context of the aya allows us to distinguish. It does not make sense to say "we test you with your accounts". And therefore, we choose "we will expose your accounts." The Abrahamic locution is a full lexicon of the Quran. It will take several generations before everything is explored. We will release sections of it in the near future insha Allahh. Every segment in this channel provides a set of such terms from the Abrahamic locution. Regards
@aamirairborne3 жыл бұрын
Assalamualaikum! Subhan Allah, your way of interpreting using the Abrahamic locution is incredible and quite convincing. Like many brothers have mentioned below, while I feel clearer and happier about the concepts I've discovered through your lectures, I am not sure how I am going to convince the other members of my family about the misconceptions they have been believing and following. May Allah guide us all! I have 2 questions on this topic: 1) So is the practice of sacrificing a goat/ram/cow wrong? 2) Is celebrating Eid-ul-Adha wrong, since the whole premise of why we celebrate it seems to be wrong. Please let me know if I need to take this discussion elsewhere, with you.
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
@ Reality Bytes by Aamir alRumi Salaamun Alaykum This video was about the story of Ibrahim and Isshaaq as told in the Quran, not about the so-sacrifice during eid, nor about the celebration of Eid-ul-Adha. I only disproved the story that was brought from the corrupted version of the Torah, concluding that the Quran told us a different story.
@SxetehakhBettehakh3 жыл бұрын
I don’t disagree with locution. What are you trying to say here? At the end of the video what is conclusion you arrived at? Can you please respond?
@MarvelousQuran3 жыл бұрын
@ noorul qureshi What we are saying is: 1. There is no evidence that Allahh wanted to put Ibrahim through the cruel test of sacrificing his own innocent son! To say that he was testing Ibrahim means that Allahh did not know how sincere Ibrahim was!!! Think about that! 2. There is clear evidence that Ibrahim was still learning the abrogation process that we discussed in this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/d6jSe2iiidWfic0 3. Circumcision for males (not females) is definitely indicated in the Quran 4. Iss-Haaq is the "Ghulam Haleem" that Allahh gave the glad tidings about to Ibrahim. 5. Iss-Haaq is the oldest son, and Issma3il... Well, more on that later! (Stay tuned) Regards
@namshadthekkethil73483 жыл бұрын
While other scholars as just using references from other people to interpret the Quran, you are using the Quran itself. I think this is the most authenticate way which will be valid even after thousands of years. Irrespective of whether your conclusions are 100% true or not, the method is really appreciated. It looks like a gift directly from God. Way more to go.