Yu-Gi-Oh! Top 5 Meta Decks That Should Get DESTROYED On The Banlist!

► Follow ShadowRabbitYGO:
► Twitter (OF): / shadowrabbitygo
► Instagram: / shadowrabbitygo
► Patreon: / shadowrabbityugioh
► Twitch: / shadowrabbitygo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use my Sleeve Chief affiliate link and get 5% off your order!
sleevechief.my...?sca_ref=3430912.BBF1S7UB4G
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use my Imperium Duelist Coupon Code ShadowRabbit10 and get 10% off your order!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use my Dragon Shield affiliate link for 5% discount!
dragonshield.c...

[@MegaCapitalG]

Tear doesn’t put up negates ??? Baronne Defluer, Toadally Awesome, Tear Cryme WUT ???

[@kendrip6960]

They don’t do it consistently tho, but I see more of ppl ending with AT LEAST Sulliek…

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Hm honestly those negates aren’t that consistent, a lot of times they’ll end on interactive disruption, like I pointed out in the video:) Negates still exist ofc but u can’t ignore Kaleido, shufflers etc.

[@sbevenine2055]

I don't want Light-Heart to get limited, I like Scareclaw

[@chimeratcg07]

I simply would put Calarium to 1 copy.

[@vikviper449]

As a scareclaw player, if they limit light heart to 2 the deck is almost cucked, depends on matchup but firewall would perform heinous acts onto them. Plus scareclaw hates setting up big boards since tri-heart can be so broken once powered up. Don’t hit light heart but maybe tri heart to two

[@jumpiestaman100]

Light-Heart to 1 completely kills Scareclaw, but also just outright kills Mannadium as well (get Impermed or Ashed on Light-Heart, and it's over if the opponent doesn't have Visas Starfrost in-hand).

[@jayman445]

They won’t as it wouldn’t do anything to mannadium

[@carlospacheco5532]

As an Infernoble player. The only ban I see viable is Connector, and that would hurt terribly for the deck. They would go for Uppercutter, yes. But Connector gives you Hand Knowledge, it’s an Ash/Imperm bait and access to Isolde for free.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I’d vibe with that

[@atticusrhodes6968]

The person who made the thumbnail deserves a raise

[@GutiTheJ]

Pot of prosperity needs to be limited already that card gives too much consistency to too many decks

[@Alex-Omega]

To every single deck to be more precise. And thats why it wont get touched at all. Prosperity is a standard staple of the combo-oriented TCG and helps everyone to get a better hand as its just a 1for1 trade basically.

[@lexusgolden738]

@@Alex-OmegaI agree

[@Scraggless]

Its not the engine consistency thats the issue. People getting to play yugioh and not bricking isn't a balance concern. Reason it should get hit though is due to floodgates

[@elliecccg7791]

ideas for hits: RACE: 1 airlifter, but hit emergency to 1 next list unchained: 1 aruha tearlament: ban both millers. i love them and i love deck but mill 5 is insane

[@Kalin_Kessler]

If the ishizu cards get banned then tearlaments will need kitkallos back at 1. Remember when tear and spright came out? Tear was tier 2/1.5 but it was definitely not the best deck.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Nah it was really good and now they have Tear Kash

[@ayh4968]

tear will just be forced to play horus

[@KevEspa7]

I disagree with the hit on tearlaments. The deck is doing fine and not getting too much on people’s business as long as they actually know how to play the game. Hitting any engine cards would just trash the deck into oblivion, and if you hit the millers like agido and kelbek (which I wouldn’t mind because they ruined the deck in my perspective) then you’d at least have to give them back something like semi limiting the main deck monsters. At the end of the day, Tear gets 3 fusion summons per turn, not 100, just 3, people can play around that and that’s what cards like bystials, crow, called by and haunted mansion are for, or something like dimensional barrier. The fact that tear can play other extra deck monsters is what makes the deck so resistant to power creep and maybe more decks should be made like that rather than less. The solution to game balance isn’t just freaking banning what makes decks good, that’s the problem with the tcg ban list, a good example is mathmech circular. The only reason that got limited was it was getting in the way of selling new cards. Also, there are hardly any semi limited cards, which in my opinion should be at least all floodgates. Returning to tear, with Kitkallos banned the deck has a much higher skill level required to reach its competitive potential, it’s not an easy deck to play and you can’t just fuse every time you mill a tear, fusions have to be done smartly and with forward thought in mind or you’d just get nibiru to the face, another reason for so long king of the swamp was played to try to stop nib and bystials, but that just introduces more bricks into the deck. Making it consistent is actually pretty hard (unless you just wait for other people to do it for you) and the deck has so many varieties now a days that honestly I believe people just hate it because maybe their favorite decks die at the first hit on a ban list or as soon as power creep comes around the corner. Just a rant I guess but that’s my honest opinion.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I really like ur thought process and agree with pretty much everything honestly, I think the millers have to go due to the reasons I listed in the video, same reason why I think Runick cards are unfair, because they’re taking away ur deck, not just benefiting the opponent’s .. They could get something back and I wouldn’t really have issues with it, Kitkallos seems a little scary but I don’t know ..

[@KevEspa7]

@@shadowrabbitygo totally agreed, the ishizu cards should have been restricted to earth monsters, fairy or something. Kitkallos should stay banned for now, it’s still a way too powerful card, pretty much does everything. But maybe semi limiting one or two of the main deck tears in exchange for banning the millers would be an interesting experiment. I agree with your perspective on cards that don’t not let the opponent use their resources. Runick, ishizu, floodgates, calamity, gimmick puppet, and even dimensional barrier to an extent should be cards that konami seeks to balance out with the banlist. Thank you for replying, I’m a new subscriber and have been loving your content, keep up the good work.

[@natanmoses674]

Hit Calamity, Kali Yuga, and stuff like gimmick puppet lock all at once. If they are all suddenly gone then Konami could have a bit of creative space going forward rather than trying to avoid enabling these types of cards more.

[@thebloodbath8437]

the problem is their are so many cards with lingering "lmao you loose" floodgate abilities konami simply cant ban them all

[@RevansNightmare]

Why would you hit calamity? It’s hard to get out against an opponent that knows what they are doing. Just imperm or veiler crimson and they are done. You can also hit centurion early.

[@DEEP-WEB]

If they want to target Infernoble, they just need to ban Phoenix Blade

[@chimeratcg07]

I agree, Phoenix Blade is busted and has been for almost 2 decades.

[@UTgohan]

They won’t ban Phoenix blade, Phoenix blade was busted back in 2007 airblade and it didn’t get touched then. Ocg has it banned but they also have 3 reasoning and 3 monster gate lol

[@chimeratcg07]

@@UTgohan I rather deal with the RnG of Monster Gate & Reasoning than the constant +1 of Phoenix Blade.

[@UTgohan]

To be fair so would I :)

[@jumpiestaman100]

* Light-Heart hit makes no sense. Mannadium isn't even a threat for the meta, because it's a typical combo deck (outright loses the game to a Droll, Nibiru also kills the deck if they can't get to Baronne on the fifth summon, doesn't play through as many handtraps as Infernobles). The deck also grinds through A LOT of its deck to output its board, meaning if you break the board, it has 0 crackback. * Rescue-ACE doesn't feel too oppressive, but I imagine a hit could happen.The realistic hit is Emergency to 1, and potentially Hydrant to 2. * Don't know too much of Infernobles overall combo lines, but they would need a hit. Likely Gearfried hit, but hitting some Infernoble names might help. Connector is probably the real issue though, because hand knowledge is seriously stupid to have in the first place. * Tearlaments is probably fine. 1 to everything already hurts it, so they have to die-roll for good mills. Even then, people run Bystials still, so not like the deck wouldn't just die to them. And Tear boards are now significantly easier to break compared to before.* Unchained eventually will get hit. The deck is far too consistent, and the fact that they can easily trigger their own effects makes them incredibly strong (also doesn't help that a lot of backrow removal is going to destroy, like Lightning Storm). Blue Dog and High Wave Caesar alone are such absurd threats to most decks (Caesar isn't even a HOPT). Yama to 1 might be good. * Purrely should honestly be hit as well. Consistency is one thing, but absurd levels of draw power make it insanely powerful. Sleepy hit might be enough, but another card being hit (e.g. My Friend Purrely) would at least balance it out a bit. * And Calamity....that should have been hit sooooooo long ago. I played it in Mannadium, and even that was stupid. This should be banned, especially since Centurions have like 9+ different ways to literally get into it for free.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Yep agreed with most of what u said, except that maybe Tear would deserve to get some names semi-limited if they hit millers (which imo should happen)

[@PhuckedUpPhilosophy]

Yeah let’s destroy a perfectly balanced rogue deck for Mannadium’s sins. Also Mannadium frequently plays only one light heart so nothing about that hit would make sense.

[@GutsmanLoL]

While I agree light heart isn’t a good hit, Any decently competent mannadium player plays 2 light heart, lol.

[@PhuckedUpPhilosophy]

@@GutsmanLoL I’ve seen plenty of competent players on only one, the logic they use is that Mannadium lives and dies by it’s first turn board. It’s not a grindy deck. If light heart gets stopped and that ends their turn, they are probably losing next turn because their hand was dog shit regardless. Follow up doesn’t matter so much when you’re ending on all those negates. I can see both sides though.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

For the most part I’ve seen builds with 2 tho, also sometimes Konami hits don’t make sense lol

[@vittoriofariello8157]

i think konami should ban just millers and isolde , others decks are not very oppressive as kashtira when it was tier 0 . Its a very different meate right now.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I wouldn’t say Kashtira was ever tier 0 tho

[@HutchJE]

Love how Infernoble tops 1 YCS and people are calling for it to get hit 😂😂😂

[@shadowrabbitygo]

That’s really not what happened u know.. It’s consistently topping regionals, meaning it’s definitely one of the top contenders and if some of the other top decks get hit, Infernoble cannot be unchecked ..

[@dpacula63]

⁠@@shadowrabbitygobut depending on who you ask regionals don’t matter. And then to an extent regionals of a Certain size or from a certain state don’t matter. Ask DB Grinder or Jesse Kotton. To them regional tops don’t count as tops. So from their point of view Infernoble has topped twice at most.

[@andybobandysings]

I dislike Isolde being splashed into decks other than Infernoble, but not as much as I dislike the package that makes it. Aqua Dolphin is just free hand knowledge at a very minimal cost.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Omfg Connector traumatised me

[@andybobandysings]

@shadowrabbitygo exactly If it wasn't like 90% guaranteed to rip sometimes the only card you have that will interact with Isolde or anything else for the rest of their turn, I would care less.

[@piccolo2966]

For infernoble: I think there's a chance they ban phoenix blade like they did in the ocg, especially considering the new phoenix gearblade card coming out sometime soon which is basically just a nerfed version of phoenix blade

[@LexxusTheSpark]

I have play tested a lot with the new phoenix blade, and I find it to actually be just as good, sometimes even better. The fact that it lets ALL of your monsters to attack twice has stolen me so many games. DDR is also a brick some games when you draw it.

[@dpacula63]

@@LexxusTheSparkI’m gonna have to see some evidence for this cause it just feels like cap. Phoenix blade banishing warriors and not being OPT makes it incredibly crucial. A ban to it feels like the deck dies. The decks not doing anything in the OCG.

[@LexxusTheSpark]

@@dpacula63 dunno what evidence you need. Playtest yourself like i did. The deck is not dead in the ocg because phoenix is banned, it is mainly not played because fire decks are stupid now with the new link 3. Infernoble struggles going 2nd vs both rescue and fire kings. And there is also the maxx C... Infernoble cannot use the Princess link 3 because their combos lock them into warriors. The new phoenix is good because you do not have to play d.d.r. which is a brick many times, and isolde makes go instantly +2 when you dump it. Sometimes you want renaud to recycle something else but d.d.r. like gearfried or a noble arms equip. Also, the effect on field is useful, unlike the old blade which is only useful as discard fodder.

[@ib5131]

There should b other mill & mill-fusion cards to play around the limits & bans ..

[@Frido19]

I play rescue-ace and I think hitting emergency to 1 would be a good hit. Emergency just let's you play around S:P, veiler, imperm and more. Having 1 air Lifter could be a good hit but with the sinful spoils engine it wouldn't hurt too too much.

[@sebastianchavez1225]

i say we ban Shifter but also ban every single Tear name. Like the dragon rulers, every single moster to 0.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Wouldn’t be fair to the deck, why kill it if it’s fine with millers banned ..

[@roltrat522]

tbh i feel the banlist isnt gonna do much just a clean up since they have alot of product right after the banlist

[@alexanderbatterbee8369]

expecting anything more from konami is foolish. they'll touch some dragon cards again instead of dealing with shifter, the draw 25 in purrley, the fact unchained rips thru literally everything, etc

[@FuckBrandedFusion]

No pls hit Tourguide, no more sangan into droll...

[@abdoflaha5006]

Knowing Konami there are two possible outcomes: 1_ a very friendly ban list where they unlimit a semi limited card or semi limit a card no one cares about....etc 2_ a crucifixion list where they ban/limit 10-15 cards and shake up the meta. The main deciding factor of course is $$$.

[@jawnathan9951]

might have a bias as an infernoble player but the hit should definitely be neo space connector and/or aqua dolphin. It's full combo on it's own, eats droll for breakfast, and even if you dont discard anything the knowledge of their hand is enough to tailor your board towards either more monster negates, more spell/trap negates, or more removal. Hitting it won't necessarily kill the deck but it limits all the unfair things it can do. We can literally discard lava golem/kaijus and thats like the best tool against us because angel ring.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Yep agreed!

[@UTgohan]

They can ban the ishizu and maybe bring the tear monsters back to two and semi limit the field spell?

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Fair

[@purewhiteloverbizarrejelly]

Limit Neo Space Connecter

[@GutsmanLoL]

You misspelled ban.

[@abyssyahoo151]

Limiting Sharvara for unchained isnt completely impossible on Konami's end. it would force unchained to play more of the blue dog if they want to continue playing the D/D/D xyz and limiting prosperity would knock the deck down from the Tier 1 spot. both of the DUNE dogs are commons anyway so there's no financial risk should they decide to reprint the cards later. Rescue ACE: Limiting emergency or semi-limiting air lifter would be a start since we dont know how much limiting prosperity will affect the deck's consistency. if Rescue Ace is still doing well as a Tier 1 deck then they can limit both of the cards. Tearlaments: banning both Agido and Kelbek is more than enough to kill the deck competitively. They already struggle against the best deck if they cant mill agido or kelbek so hitting both will put the final nail in the coffin. Purrely: i think the deck needs to addressed in some way. i dont think the goblin cards are gonna do enough to stop that deck so limiting sleepy memory should be enough. Infernoble: this can go either way: Ban aqua dolphin to increase their weakness towards droll and other handtraps or they can ban Divine sword phoneix blade thinking that infernoble will get eaten alive by the other upcoming decks. all of these predictions are under the assumption that prosperity will be limited. Triple tactical talents can be semi limited as well as fenrir taking the limit due to their popularity in decklists. (Cuz thats what Konami does).

[@ultimatechampion4830]

Prosperity semi

[@elcalich33sehead]

If the Ishizu millers get banned, you think Kitkallos can come back?

[@chimeratcg07]

Imo Instant Fusion should have been banned instead of Kitkallos.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Hm that’s a tough question, I’m not sure actually, feels a little scary to bring it back, I think the deck would still be insane if that was to happen

[@elcalich33sehead]

@@shadowrabbitygo I figure, the deck was strong but not overpowering on release, and only got to tier zero status once the Ishizu cards came out. And before that, the girls were at 3. If all four Ishizu fairies were banned, I don’t see why Kitkallos would be too powerful to unban.

[@ariellegrenierkersey8965]

I honestly think hitting the millers kill the deck altogether. They should definitely be banned, but at that point they need to get something back, even if it's an extra copy of a couple names

[@PhuckedUpPhilosophy]

It definitely does not kill the deck

[@Alex-Omega]

How many times people thought the deck would be dead by now? They can be glad if only the millers and not other Tear names go straight to 0 as well

[@PhuckedUpPhilosophy]

@@Alex-Omega I’ve had my face beaten in with tear even when they haven’t milled a single ishizu card. It’s a tier one deck with both millers, I’d say it sinks to tier 2/high rogue with them gone. That’s not a “dead deck”. Prank kids with meow mu banned, now THATS a dead deck (may it RIP 😢).

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I wouldn’t be against them getting a little something back but I don’t think the deck would be dead with millers banned either

[@ariellegrenierkersey8965]

dead is probably an exaggeration, but wow does it already feel like a hollow shell of what it used to be@@shadowrabbitygo

[@thebloodbath8437]

controversial take: almost every single powerful deck right now has a problematic link 2 that enables it, lets get rid of them. ie: ban isolde, ban cross sheep, ban yamma, ban jasmine, ban all the ichizu cards (that ones personal). and the meta would be thrown upside down. of course, that would never happen. but i hope to at least see one or two of those problematic cards go.

[@alonsoenriqueduarteperla8480]

Nooo Naia, what Tear did to you? :(

[@carlosmiguel1105]

Just ban aqua dolphin and infernoble is fine.

[@ib5131]

They better nt hit Tear or Ishizu!

[@TheInfamousMyst]

If they hit Agido and/or Kelbek before YCS Sydney, I’ll be in tears as I plan on playing Naturia on that event. But then again, I can always find a way to make Naturia consistent without it to be honest, so I’m kinda 50/50 on it haha. Edit: Naturia Sacred Tree did nothing wrong, it’s Runick’s fault 😭

[@Timikator]

The banlist will drop after YCS Bologna, for sure

[@TheInfamousMyst]

@@Timikator I guess its time for me to cry I guess. IF they do hit both millers. Or maybe I'll just cook, again.

[@konstantin8jmateev393]

So hit centurion,mannadium,infernoble,purrely,vanquish soul,horus mandatory,diabellstar,chimera

[@shadowrabbitygo]

That’s not a real take

[@konstantin8jmateev393]

@@shadowrabbitygo But better to ruin all decks,why only meta an tier 1.5,better just to make ban list so obelisk structure deck to be tier 1.Also I dont think is fair to destroy only meta decks,it shall apply to all decks which have potential-spright also,branded,bystial

[@marsplo9618]

bro i dont get people that say rescue ace is op. like just have ash , imperm or veiler in hand and you win 🤣

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I literally pointed out ways of playing around those cards🤦🏼‍♀️

[@lavagolem2015]

Congrats on 13K subs!! Been here since 1000>🎉

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I appreciate u so much🐰

[@RevansNightmare]

Calamity doesn’t need hit. The card has several choke points before it gets on the field. If they do manage to get Calamity they kinda deserve it.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Nah Calamity is one card combo and that’s really unfair even it it can get disrupted

[@Antto64751]

In my opinion if they ban the ishizu cards the deck will get nerfed too much until it gets power crept, ok that terlaments is one of the most played decks but some decks are more broken. I agree on the fact that the ishizu cards can mill the cards from the opponent deck too but a lot of times the opponent always makes recovery plays

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I don’t think it’s that easy to make recovery plays actually and I could see them getting some names back to 2 to balance things out if millers get hit

[@oscarlaud470]

​@shadowrabbitygo what's ironic is that the names aren't even an issue. All of them are hopt and are easily accessible through rhinofart and the field spell, it just makes them less susceptible to dd crow or bystials.

[@shadowdraqon2479]

I would be happy if they limited isolde cuz i only play 1 in my deck anyways

[@PJTMercury]

I don't have any suggestions for the banlist. I think the format is okay for the time being. Maybe ban Calamity?

[@bendemey6299]

Ban the ishizu millers but give kitkallos back. I said what I said

[@MT-bd6uv]

The only thing Konami needs to do is unban mystic mine...

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Naaaahhhh

[@justinmendiola1868]

Rescue Ace is a brick deck… I play this deck for a couple months and I gave up on it because I always open contain extinguish preventer turbulence and ash this deck is cursed

[@erikbofo2649]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Lol I’m sorry to hear that but it’s really not that bricky tbh, especially with Sinful Spoils

[@justinmendiola1868]

@@shadowrabbitygo I think I would disagree along with many who play the deck Joshua shmitt and Jesse cotton think its bricky

[@justinmendiola1868]

@@shadowrabbitygo with the sinful spoils package still runs 10 bricks

[@shadowrabbitygo]

@@justinmendiola1868 yep I said it’s not *that* bricky with the engine, u need to run the bricks ofc but for the most part they’re worth playing cause u’re gonna combo more times than brick

[@kb24shortoreo21]

Crimson dragon Miller shuffler Wave king Pot Fenrir Lv4 rescue ace Isolde Purely trap/ sleepy Runnick tip

[@lexusgolden738]

Pot limited fenrir limited ?

[@kb24shortoreo21]

@@lexusgolden738 limit yea

[@shadowrabbitygo]

It would be helpful if u wrote what should happen to those cards

[@chronobretz9511]

for unchained just hit tour guide and pot to 1 and the deck pretty much falls off instantly and for tear they really just need to ban all 3 fusion tear main decks at this point let it freakin die

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Nah I disagree, don’t want Tear to die and they also won’t hit Tour Guide imo

[@RevansNightmare]

I despise tear

[@Alex-Omega]

All Tear Names to 0. Idgaf if its strong or not, I just dont wanna see it aynmore. Same with all the Kashtira Names. Also ban Isolde and Calamity

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Damn

[@dpacula63]

Bruh people need to leave Infernoble alone lolz yes the deck is super strong but it’s so hard to play that it’s never gonna get the crazy representation the other meta decks do. If Isolde, Phoenix blade, or maybe even connector get banned this deck is dead. Or at least forces people to play the wanted engine so the deck is no longer accessible.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

The deck is better because of the wanted engine, every topping list plays it, it’s not like the engine isn’t needed

[@Evan20000]

Ban Isolde, Ceruli, King Calamity, Kali Yuga, Gimmick Puppet Nightmare, and Apollousa. Apo will consistently rear her head to be a problem with any deck that can vomit extra bodies onto the board without a lock and the rest are pseudo-FTKs or enablers going first.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Apollousa is honestly so fair .. There’s so many ways of dealing with it and if they make it early to play around Nib, u immediately make them use one neg if u opened it so it’s usually gonna be 1600 and there’s a lot of things that can beat over that .. The rest of the cards sure but Apo doesn’t make sense

[@axelghost09]

Come on 😭 why everyone want prosperity limited or banned? I just got my set 😭

[@lexusgolden738]

Banlist arrives on january i guess but im not sure but for the moment play them. Just use them during December and we’ll see what happens.

[@PartyMarty321]

I don’t think anyone wants it banned but the card is just too good!

[@lexusgolden738]

@@PartyMarty321 not really

[@drkdia4872]

the fact people are hatin on connector and aqua dolphin is the funniest thing ever lol. read that again its not them, its the rest of infernoble you dont like. you dont want to see warrior toolbox reprised in some form and moments like this is why reinforcement cant come back to 2 or 3. just start hitting the noble arms and infernoble extendeders

[@shadowrabbitygo]

You’re kidding right? Connector has been a problem since it’s release .. Why hit an entire deck when the actual issue is hand knowledge and discard🤦🏼‍♀️

[@drkdia4872]

@shadowrabbitygo hand knowledge cards have been around since at least dark crisis. no one likes to reveal hand knowledge, but the culprits are always and have always been the the ones that use cards in question. connector is slow in comparison to modern cards and its first effect is on normal summon only. negate it there shouldnt be a high rate of actually having that effect resolve. it is not the problem it is the decks it is put into. for example card destruction had not been a huge problem until you put it in dark world. sometimes it really is the other cards in the deck like tear has pretty much been limited in ways i have never seen a deck hit before. that deck has been pulled apart and still is relevant. the deck will still do the same thing with or without connector. negate it with the 9 or more handtraps everyone plays now anyways. its not broken in the slightest

[@shadowrabbitygo]

@@drkdia4872 “just negate it” .. so be forced to waste a card on it because otherwise they’ll take it from u anyway, u’d have to open ash, imperm or veiler (which veiler is not in every deck) exactly to deal with the card and if they have just one extender, they’re playing on anyway so now u have to have another card to stop them since they took ur card .. the cards that do the hand ripping are the issues, not the decks, no one said to kill infernoble so connector or dolphin are actually reasonable hits

[@drkdia4872]

@shadowrabbitygo i never said infernoble should exist in its current iteration. ash/imperm/veiler/etc were made to do that exact thing. negate it. thats their purpose and if they were ment to negate something else that people worry about, then thats a different problem that people dont have enough answers to deal with what they are facing. when people go after these cards better understand just like the handtraps they have to draw it. 3 connectors 1 dolphin and possibly 1 rota....9-12 handtraps have a bigger % of opportunity to be pulled than those 5. btw gemini imps also exist to counter dolphin. modern yugi problems are i cant go off the way i want to because 1 things stops me. it is the duelist's responsibility to build their decks to handle as many situations they can based on many factors such as meta calls. this is no different connector and dolphin just arent broken to warrant limits and bans. side decks exist for these situations

[@finnianfanning3136]

For Infernoble just ban Dolphin. Probably the fairest hit.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Connector ..

[@finnianfanning3136]

@@shadowrabbitygo Dolphin is the problem though. What does Connector do without Dolphin? Dolphin is still accessible off Isolde. It just seems like the “ban Dagda” argument. Dolphin actually does the hand ripping. I don’t know if I’d even cut it completely if they banned Connector.

[@BobJohnson86]

Do you think they should ban Crimson Dragon?

[@kendrip6960]

Better off starting with Calamity lock

[@chimeratcg07]

Too new

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Hm they might do it later but I don’t think it’s needed right now if they hit Calamity

[@DerTomatoXD]

People keep hating on tear just cant play the game imo. Its so easy to stop

[@alexanderbatterbee8369]

ban shifter and every deck that gets hurt by it but sides it anyway

[@shadowrabbitygo]

So don’t hit the decks that get hurt by it but don’t side it? Doesn’t really make sense ..

[@devinkilburn6844]

Didn't you just say in your last video that mannadium won't get hit and now you're saying to hit light heart now lol

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Yeah I said in this video that I got a comment on the previous video saying that Light Heart might get hit and that I feel like that’s a valid take, just making conversation, I don’t think Mannadium is too insane or anything and I don’t think Konami does either, so it’s still a safe investment but u never know what they decide to do:)

[@thescentleman8810]

Hits to Tear are massively unnecessary. Hasn’t won a thing and tops are so sporadic. 🤣🤷‍♂️

[@shadowrabbitygo]

It’s consistently doing well, has been around for quite a while and millers are unfair, not saying the deck has to be killed, they can even semi-limit some names for all I care but millers are terrible

[@LexxusTheSpark]

Banning the millers is just a good thing to do. They are inherently unfair and broken in their own right. They are limiting card design as well.

[@oneeyedowl8289]

Can we ban merli and bring back my boi elf #elfdidnothingwrong

[@shadowrabbitygo]

Merrli and Elf were issues together but that’s not the only deck Elf did too much for

[@purewhiteloverbizarrejelly]

Ban Crimson Dragon.

[@chimeratcg07]

Too new.

[@purewhiteloverbizarrejelly]

And the cycle of Verte Anaconda and Halqifibrax continues

[@chimeratcg07]

@@purewhiteloverbizarrejelly Verte was indeed busted, but imo Halq helped so many lower tier decks compete, I saw Halq as an extender, nothing broken because all of the best Lv3 and lower tuners were banned.

[@KindredFenrir]

Instead of hitting ishizu cards I'd like them to just drive a stake into tearlament directly. Finish of the remaining 3 limits to the forbidden list.

[@andrewgood7586]

Competitive games that constantly shift because of new materials/content that clearly promote a cash grab pay to win system are not viable competitive games. Yugioh sucks ass.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

I agree to an extent .. They still release cheap and viable structure decks and try to make good reprint sets tho.. If u play competitively u’d want to spend the money since it’s ur hobby, I don’t know

[@andrewgood7586]

@@shadowrabbitygo I dont want to have to keep spending money to even stay viable. If you cant play what you want and still be competitive, the game is poorly balanced. Shit like that would be completely unacceptable in any real sport.

[@shadowrabbitygo]

@@andrewgood7586 there’s no way to play want u want and stay competitive, I totally get where ur coming from but they gotta push the game forward, power creep is a thing and at the end of the day they’re trying to make money .. Again, I understand but it’s unrealistic to want to play ur fave deck forever .. There’s also fun in playing something new I guess but yeah, sometimes we can get priced out of the meta and that sucks ..

[@andrewgood7586]

@@shadowrabbitygo Exactly, because the game is trash competitively. Its just fact.

[@oscarlaud470]

​@@andrewgood7586what an awful take

[@lexusgolden738]

I disagree with scareclaw light heart

[@nael_luna]

I just hope Tearlaments get hit somewhat meaningfully, it's unbearable how milling half the decks gives only one player many many plusses and unaoutable boss monsters

[@shadowrabbitygo]

They’re not unoutable but I get ur point

[@nael_luna]

@@shadowrabbitygo yeah not truly unaoutable cause you can ban them or make the player end the resources to mill to bring those back but I don't really care enough to learn competitive decks' ins and outs, I barely know my rogue deck tactics🤣