Premier League Goes Full American

[@Damian_1989]

"the world is bigger than the premier league" is a phrase many in the premier league will refuse to hear

[@ian_r125]

Most fans in england arent even aware its supposed to be the biggest league

[@luizm-s9t]

5:56 7:29 I thought I had entered a time-space continuum loop, but it's just Zealand's usual tomfoolery

[@antoniobirne769]

Exacly, I went to the coments just to make sure I wasn’t getting crazy, thank you

[@OTW265]

lmao ty

[@askefn]

For every like this comment gets Zealand will run 1 mile

[@magruster]

57 miles and counting dude..... go full forrest gump?

[@Sam-es2gf]

No he won't

[@TheStuartGibson]

184 miles, he could run the full length of my country and some

[@TheStuartGibson]

​@@Sam-es2gfdon't be a spoil sport

[@gracielynn9623]

I guess he is running 326 miles.

[@ThomasSamoth-ls8ed]

Just enforce FFP properly, close loopholes and punish those who cheat. But laziness and corruptions prevents therm from doing that.

[@xmari3goldx]

Agreed. But I hope it goes through because other leagues play better football imo and they will be more attractive to better players

[@silaswarren8418]

Nah, we need to reform FFP so it doesn’t screw over the little guys and help the big guys. I’m an Everton fan and while it may be true that we spent more than we should have, clubs like Liverpool (who are mostly safe from FFP allegations) get to spend three times what we can. It’s unfair that we can’t compete with these massive clubs, that’s exactly what the American sport system prevents. Not that we need to Americanize football, but something needs to change.

[@DomenBremecXCVI]

"Before you can actually vote on the full thing you need to know what you're voting on." One word: Brexit

[@bhvillaman4401]

I think the reason we (villa) rejected it because we have incredibly rich owners and our revenue is only going to get bigger over the next few seasons, and i would imagine we dont want the likes of forest potentially competing with us financially. I imagine our owners want to be the only new club in the exclusive zone of the top 4

[@RichBigJohnson]

That’s what I was thinking. That’s great news for Villa fans right? It means the owners want to spend money? This is new for Villa.

[@mrcurlywurly9338]

Zealand slowly turning into Penguinz0 is a plot twist I never expected

[@InteristaS5]

He’s the soccer version of Charlie but I think Zealand is way more talented when it comes to speaking off the cuff. Both cool dudes though lol

[@Mombot_z]

And both are from Tampa, Fl 😊

[@bonganinyathikazi7796]

PenguinZealand😂

[@sjchxhtriskit3025]

RUN YOU CHOCOLATE EATER, RUNNNNN

[@sketchycard887]

thank you for teaching me both about amortisation and deja vu in the same video

[@tray2204]

I thought I was the only one hearing the same stuff twice 😂

[@ClaretKev1980]

Villa have opposed it because, in theory, every club can spend (I believe I've seen) 85% of their money, while we only get 70% because of European rules. Instantly, they can outspend and overtake us

[@cardboardbox4093]

man united punching the air not being able to spend hundreds of millions on bad players

[@cltmck]

The same pool being used for both salaries and transfer fees is very interesting. I'd imagine over time that that would change the transfer policies of all clubs in general and cause clubs to look inward to their academies more to put as many players as possible on the field that cost essentially nothing.

[@i.blomen]

Not sure of this will be of interest to anyone, but a norwegian artist actually made a song where they used the Leeds press conference you are talking about as an intro. Called "Gary Speed" and is by Lars Vaular.

[@natethegreat22916]

Can’t wait to see premier league games in Nashville, Wolves vs Leicester in Tennessee we will be there

[@Simbaforlife]

Man City vs Man Utd at Raymond James stadium 😍

[@maxl.b.m.y.g.5918]

Zealand being American is perfect for this

[@DrZaius3141]

10:30 Um, yeah. Real and Barca do have a salary cap. It depends on their revenue, but La Liga does technically have a salary cap.

[@scottbrayton9484]

I don't love salary caps. It's transfer spending which needs corraling, not paying players.

[@captainkidd22]

Nope it's the other way around

[@PhilliesNostalgia]

@@captainkidd22How? Prior to Neymar’s transfer, there were only a few players who had gone for €70M or more. Now it’s practically everyone. I think part of the reason why North American sports leagues (besides the NHL) will often give salaries of $30M+ regularly, is because they don’t have to pay an additional amount in order to just get the player

[@TheDieseI]

In US sports, salary cap leagues also have a total team salary floor and minimum wage for specific kinds of players (rookies, vet minimums, practice squad minimums, etc) so that players still get paid

[@Pdjwvdugowqnxbgze]

Both

[@nelsoncarvalho6338]

I think the PL should use a model like la liga where the teams can spend a percentage of revenue in players but with teams out of Europe being able to spend a larger percentage than those in Europe. It won’t hold back the big team and will let small teams spend

[@Nolan-55]

The problem is you have a giant like Real Madrid(who I'm a fan of) can spend more than Athletico and Barcelona combined. Real Madrid=727m Ahtletico= 303m Barca=204m Sevilla=152m Like how can anyone catch Real Madrid? Obviously, Barcelona brought it upon themselves with piss poor financial management.

[@nelsoncarvalho6338]

@@Nolan-55I’m aware of the problem in la liga but that’s who the EPL teams are competing against in Europe. Also this percent of revenue spend is better than the current PRS rules. The one thing I like about European football is that there isn’t a hard salary cap that makes everything equal.

[@ngefan76]

The best solution, IMHO, is a Luxury Tax like the MLB or NBA. If you want to spend money to try to win everything like Man City or the Yankees, and you have the cash to do it, you can, but you're gonna pay the rest of the league cash in order to do it.

[@yannicklarafunez4768]

And then allocate that money into a pool and redistribute it to the other teams with lower revenue teams getting more

[@unthoughtwords]

Villa fan - we've had some speculation on our vote and I think it's likely because of what you went on to say about European FFP rules still applying. Most of the big clubs will be able to spend the ~550m because that will be 70% of their revenue to comply with Europe but Villa, now just establishing ourselves in the PL's European spots, will have to spend significantly lower than the teams above them *and* the teams not in Europe chasing them because the amount the PL lets us (and them) spend is way more than UEFA will.

[@silverjackk]

I hope this could have the effect that the transfer market is scaling down a little. Lets be real here, its mostly the Prem clubs that drive up the prices for players by their immense bidding power. With a spending cap, clubs might to double-think the amount they bid for certain players, so that the transfer fees scale down a little. But I might be a little naive on this hope

[@treasuren]

Ever since I stopped going on Twitter and IG, the things I hear on this channel genuinely blow me away

[@ian_r125]

95% of English football fans already actively cheer for big European clubs when they play big PL clubs anyways, so that aspect of it isnt a problem

[@OrlovKruskayev]

Can't wait for Nott Forest to pop in to brazil and purchase half my team to go bankrupt in a blaze of glory

[@oikhena]

There will always be loopholes. Reporting suggests that agents that represents clubs won’t be part of the cap so wouldn’t be surprised to hear more of agents just happening to represent both sides of the deal so that they can be paid low fees from the player side and high fees from the club side

[@alexkarmy]

ehm, la liga has spending limits quote "This squad spending limit denotes the maximum amount that each club/SAD can spend during the course of the 2023/24 season following the summer transfer market, including spending on the first team in relation to players, the manager, assistant manager and fitness coach (registrable squad, as defined in Art. 38 of the Budget Preparation Rules) and spending on the reserves, the youth system and other areas (non-registrable squad, as defined in Art. 38 of the Budget Preparation Rules)"

[@kevinmack9980]

I think this is awesome for the sport!

[@jairo2101]

FYI The reason Villa voted against is because now teams not in Europe will be able to spend a lot more than them because they have to adhere to UEFA FFP (which are tied to income, which Villa really don't get much of compared to other teams in europe) whereas clubs who aren't in europe won't and will potentially overtake them because of this

[@MrMultichris234]

Spanish clubs actually have a sort of salary cap and it effectively handcuffs their ability to have a negotiating leverage. It’s really complicated though…

[@NeverwascooL]

I'm guessing guys in the Premier League are thinking this will become an inevitable thing at some point in the future and hoping they could push the other big leagues to get a salary cap and then they could be ahead of the game at that point. By being in the swing of limited spending. I also think they could be trying to do it so they can save money on big players in the future too by having everyone on limited spending.

[@thepandaken5475]

I think the calculus is that this will encourage the other leagues to follow suit. They aren't worried about Real Madrid or Barcelona or PSG because they think all those clubs will soon be subject to similar regulation.

[@linkssacrifice7441]

Dinner time Zealandism 👍 now I can eat.

[@Stylish1874]

In reality the BBC's article was misleading, because the cap is still 85% of your revenue up to a maximum of 5 times the lowest TV revenue. Therefore in the example given 560 million pounds will be the maximum but only if 560 million is lower than 85% of their revenue.

[@KeosiYT]

Honestly the PL has been making some good changes recently

[@calvg12]

What I foresee happening as that a team in 7th might be able to outspend a team in 6th based on one being restricted by UEFA P&S rules and the other not

[@lilbaz8073]

Not really. The extra revenue from europe should balance it out.

[@lilbaz8073]

Also no prem team should really bank on european football when planning their budget. Chelsea might be finding that out the hard way.

[@Lavassin]

I think the main problem is exactly the fact that there are other leagues who will take advantage of the PL having a salary cap. I don't think there is a solution that works flawlessly.

[@truechaosmulala3831]

The problem I see with this is either the cap is to high (leads being able to spend 500+ million) or to low (250-million where the big 6 can’t spend what they want to spend in Europe) a salary cap is a bad idea with how it works. If though you do put it in I think the only solution would be a soft cap you where if you spend over you pay tax which you could make go to either other clubs use as parachute payments or even send down the football pyramid.

[@marvinehre9770]

You forgot player swaps marketed as 2 200M transfer deals.

[@ivandankob7112]

A salary cap is good when all leagues have it enforced, but any other league that installs it is shooting itself in a foot and is at disadvantage vs other leagues (like where would a hypothetical Mbappe go - to the club that will make him filthy rich or to the club where his riches are capped by some filthy rich owners 😂)

[@Slvrbuu]

Salary Cap = more money for the owners, less for the talent that actually has to draw people to the games. At least in America.

[@silaswarren8418]

In American soccer, not football or basketball

[@ryanmcniff2245]

​@@silaswarren8418A cap on spending creates a scarcity of funds for player signings, which will by definition drive wages down. Assuming teams make the same revenue, this means more money that the owners get to keep

[@silaswarren8418]

@@ryanmcniff2245 you’re right to an extent. The salary cap does put a limit on how much players can make, however it ensures a level of extreme competition not seen anywhere in the European models of monetization and has also led to the most lucrative leagues in the world. The lowest paid NFL players, randos who are third string DBs who will never set foot on the field during the game, get paid $750,000 per year. That’s absurdly high. Why can they do that? Because, in large part, salary caps and long-term investment in the sport. Not a single team in American top-level sports is in financial danger because of the ways we set things up. The salary cap proposed by the Prem isn’t even that good, but it might be a step in the right direction. This is not a zero-sum game, there’s winners and there’s winners if you do it right.

[@ryanmcniff2245]

@@silaswarren8418 MLS, a major American sports league with a salary cap, claims they have never made a yearly profit. NHL, another major American sports league with a salary cap, had to take over the operations of the Arizona Coyotes after they went bankrupt. It was only this year that a new owner was found who will move the team to Utah. American sports teams don't fail because they have franchises, not because they have a salary cap. If the point of a salary cap was to truly invest in the league, they would follow a luxury tax model like in baseball. Under this system, teams can pay what they want but anything over a certain number is "taxed" by the league and redistributed to lower salaried teams, LITERALLY providing these teams with extra investment. If done in England, this could be distributed to the EFL and keep them financially secure.

[@williamcross210]

@@silaswarren8418 US salary caps are determined by negotiation between the owners and the players. The lowest paid players get that amount because that is what the players association demanded as part of their acceding to the owners demand to force themselves (the owners) to make money. So you are pretty clueless in your statements

[@Telsion]

10:30 "Barcelona doesn't have salary cap." Yep. They probably should though

[@Journey22405]

For me the spending cap can only be a good thing because if teams are spending properly then things can only get more competitive, I've long said that the prem is boring now because its not like it was in the 2000s and early 2010s, sure even back then teams would get obliterated by the top clubs, but in general it was closer and more competitive. Where as now hitting 90+ points is a must to win the league and to achieve that you need to beat the plurality of the league home and away all season. If you look at the championship this season, clubs were so close and teams were losing enough games that teams REJOINED the title race and the race for promotion, that concept seems alien to the premier league because there is such a huge divide between those that have (arsenal city liverpool ect) and those that dont (brentford palace burnley and especially Luton and Sheffield.) I think a spending cap could help bring all the teams more in line with each other, if for some reason say bournemouth wanted to spend a lot of money they could and they would slowly become more comeptitive, as you said though, if we reach a point where every team upon entering the prem spends up to the spending cap then the teams that go down will instantly suffer because of it. most if not all will suffer points deductions and maybe even administration if they hit prem spending cap and then got relegated too. IMO the best way for this to be implemented is for the spending cap to come in along side ffp rather than replacing ffp. That means that clubs cant spend too far beyond their means but it also means that teams, if they want to establish a super team cant do what city (allegedly but almost certainly) done and just spend hundreds of millions each window to bring in some of the best players in the world every year. I think that way the teams at the lower level will still be held to their financial sustainability rules but also teams at the top will be capped in what they can do. Could also help reduce things like the ridiculous player wages we see in the prem as well as the premier league transfer tax that we see also but im less sure on that tbf.

[@Banditman]

Phil Jones was a great example of wages restricting transfers for Man United.

[@svokxz6435]

As an American I am happy premier league wants to be competitive like mls

[@redhaattout]

10:35 ac milan has a salary cap it s 5mil/year the rest are bonuses (only one player goes on top of salary cap it was gigio then romagnoli and now it s leao).

[@lilbaz8073]

Prem teams will still have to abide by the 85% cost control measures. This will just be on top.

[@Mr.Korzack]

Oh, right, so they'll still need to do the 70/85% based on if they're in continental competitions or not? Thanks for the clarifier, I've been Royally confused for a while about all of this XD

[@jaquandrejones]

This is simple until a richer team's lawyers figure out how to spend even more money somehow. New rules just give clubs with the most lawyer money more ways to spend more money.

[@its_me_tg7120]

Harold Kane has just scored to put Bayern up 2-1. Warra time to score

[@GothPaoki]

Unfortunately this had to happen. Teams like city have abused the system so badly that they had to impose new rules to keep the credibility of the league. No one wants to see a team monopolising the league because it has an entire state behind it instead of grinding for it fairly by their own means like everybody else.

[@laser__unicorn]

Why isn't Chelsea and Man Unt monopolising the league then?

[@GothPaoki]

@@laser__unicorn are Chelsea and man united owned by a state?

[@MrBrasserie]

@@GothPaoki united turned football into a business, chelsea poured money into it, city took it to the next level. each club has directly effected football into money in there own way

[@GothPaoki]

@@MrBrasserie I'm not saying they haven't contributed to that but it was city specifically that broke the system.

[@nitoritou]

@@MrBrasseriespot on

[@flameofthegame]

I would assume Aston Villa had plans in the near future to spend a load of money similar to what Chelsea did last year ,that's the only reason i can think of them being against this changes .

[@treasuren]

Villa quietly have one of the richest owners in the league. That's why they're opposed to the spending cap

[@Only-Funz]

Spanish teams do in fact have a salary cap

[@thilodemand2847]

Afe you going to make a video about aachen? They just got promoted from the german 4th devision after 13 years in the regionalliga while keeping an average attendance of about 25k

[@andyX03]

I thought I was the only one saving Zealandisms for my meals 😅

[@superdigo7342]

GG, some Saudi teams will be very happy to hear this. Really smart decision.

[@bucklberryreturns]

With £500M you can get five £70M players on £200k a week, or three of them and a worldie. Not an issue for big clubs. Keeping in mind, when Amazon purchase the rights, TV income raises again. Unless it is tied to club income too, I do see smaller clubs suffering longterm.

[@Suarez05]

The Problem with that is Amazon is about to lose Domestic PL Rights soon.

[@bucklberryreturns]

@@Suarez05 Who buys the rights is besides the point, the money always increases.

[@deanrwatson]

Wait, over what timescale is this "Cap" is it a rolling annual Cap I assume? Currently Man Utd and Man City, spend approx £190m a year on wages alone. That would give them £360m to spend on Transfers and Agent fees? Compared to say Luton who would get to spend £518m.

[@TheStuartGibson]

Someone create a database for this let's game it out

[@its_me_tg7120]

"Nobody wants to pay Aaron Wan Bissaka's wages. Not picking on him. He's not even the worst situation at Man Utd" Looking at you ANTONY👀

[@DemonDjz]

Serious question could you just not vote to raise the salary cap if the big clubs are being outspent?

[@wideboii4523]

Anybody knows how much clubs like Man City actually spend anually? Because their wages are under 200 million and their net spend for transfers isnt higher than 100 mil either, so are they even affected by the salary cap?

[@stopspyingonme9210]

I feel like it’s gonna be like an apple usb C type thing. If you want to do business in Europe you have to submit to ffp. Too much hassle to follow 2 sets of rules

[@ralv]

Zealandism and Coffee time.

[@shrobee]

Parity in the prem needs to improve. You need as many nets as possible in there because the greatest harm to that is promoted teams not being able to compete financially

[@Matt-pt3vq]

Importantly…someone working on the db edit to remove this as soon as Si add it right?

[@TheStuartGibson]

What happens to the psr news from last week for the 25/26 season?

[@Murphinator-gx5on]

I think the best way to get around idiotic owners driving their clubs into the ground is to have fans own a majority of the club like in Germany so owners can't just do whatever they like, an independent regulator and proper screening and vetting people's financial ability before allowing them to buy a club

[@ellcaa4220]

FFP bad cuz it prevents rich from investing. Spirit of the game lost cuz rich can just buy success. Thank you Zealand for just having the most immediate, reactive takes imaginable.

[@gracielynn9623]

I don’t view it as a bad thing. Sure, Chelsea can only spend $560M now instead of $1B, but Crystal Palace and Brighton can now double their spending, and that offsets it. It adds more parody within the prem but other leagues still won’t outcompete.

[@keithwhittaker]

I thought the £500+m was a maximum and each club would be limited to 80% of there income or 70% if in Europe

[@RichBigJohnson]

For Villa fans, that’s a good sign that the club rejected the cap right? It means the owners want to spend money?

[@hamletwatson5561]

Bro Man City is so pissed rn. If actually put in place this would be amazing

[@RonnieWave]

Man city literally would benefit the most from this because they are one of the richest clubs.

[@hamletwatson5561]

@@RonnieWave in the prem yes, on the continent no. I think if done correctly this could bring England closer to the other top leagues, which could be a huge lifeline for struggling leagues.

[@felixmustermann790]

@@hamletwatson5561 just because a league is the most watched doesnt mean its running away from the competition, by that definition La Liga is fuckin bonkers with real madrid winning the CL every other season or so

[@christopherkalleja8204]

Just start supporting the Bundesliga if you like football for the culture. The fans have been fighting against any type of further monetization and they are winning!

[@gts1300]

Other concepts I want in football: reverse clock, so as to end all extra time shenanigans; and the right to challenge a referre's decision

[@octavianpopescu4776]

Why? What would that do? Especially "the right to challenge" part... if anything, I think players shouldn't have any right to challenge and they should get more yellow cards for protesting, including red cards. A lot of time is wasted because they protest a lot of decisions.

[@PunnyPanther]

Comment for the chocolate turtles

[@StandardRossoneri]

Why won’t Z talk about Milan vs Sassuolo? Or running?!??!?

[@chesbaret]

More manor lords please and thank you

[@truongphan5787]

On stream right now

[@joehunt390]

No chance they put a salary cap in

[@seanspx2219]

As you said, this rule will directly drag down the best english clubs (yes, all of them), from competing on Europe's biggest stage against teams who can spend what they like. And this will in turn, drive better players away from the premier league as they want to join more successful clubs, driving revenue down, and ultimately ruining the premier league

[@aristaeus2514]

La Liga has strict rules regarding salaries, Italy has no money and Germany as well is strictly governed.. Only leaves France (PSG) to worry about and they are already spending as much as they can.

[@Damian_1989]

The situation in those 3 leagues can change in the future, they're not gonna be stuck forever like that. Especially not Spain, with scoundrels like Tebas running things, you can bet they'll find the dirtiest of tactics to make money and surpass the Prem, especially since Barsa and Madrid have historically been UEFA's darlings...

[@jaybeer3126]

​@@Damian_1989so you think they're voluntarily right now not choosing to make more money?

[@ian_r125]

I doubt even real madrid, barca or bayern are even spending right now above what the prem cap will be. It doesnt matter anyway, people will still support their clubs and you dont always need top players to win european tournaments. Nobody in england is fretting about it not being as good as other leagues.

[@aristaeus2514]

@@Damian_1989 if so, you will have about a decade of time to react to it. Yes things might change in other leagues, but you will be able to see it coming and who says the PL will not change along with it?

[@CTQOrigi]

PSR is good for keeping clubs afloat, but to solve the inequity issues you should allow owners to give clubs gifts that they don’t have to pay back. That allows owners and fans to “live the dream” but not kill the club. The owners can bankrupt themselves without stealing a cultural institution from the people. Also enforce the damn fit and proper persons test so murderous regimes and gangsters can’t buy football clubs

[@TH1RDP3RSON]

Z, speaking of the salary cap, do you Think Stammer will remain a member of the Lightning for the rest of his career? Cheers. also Go Bruins

[@sjchxhtriskit3025]

I think they need to add a hardcoded minimum limit. Say you’re a club that sucks and you get promoted to the prem. What’s stopping you from not televising your game’s and telling the league to get rekt. And assuming there is something, what’s stopping fans of that club to stop watching to help their club? And lastly tv revenue is made over the whole year so would it be a guessing game on how close you can get, or would they offset the $ by a year to logistically solve a lot of issues

[@aristaeus2514]

you cant do those things, that's the simple answer.

[@benbutcher9672]

The PL is intent on hamstringing itself to the point the other leagues can catch up. Madness.

[@christianhernandez2651]

Get ready for man city to do what do dodgers did with ohtani last year.

[@PH-jv4ik]

I dont know why salary caps should be such a hot button topic, transfer fees are arbitrary and kinda weird when you think about it. Who decides whats a 50m player or a 100m player.

[@nealfirstofhisname]

PSR: "You can spend 5 million more than your revenue per year (three year average), and owners are allowed to cover an additional 30 million per year (three year average), for a total of 35 million per year or 105 million in 3 years." This isn't simple?

[@kieronparr3403]

Parachute payments have always annoyed me. Rewarding failure. Helping teams "bounce back" rather than play on merit. like gambling know your limits and stick to it.

[@defeatstatistics7413]

i mean, i guess its to stop what happened to Portsmouth and Palace from happening again.

[@bfccarl2509]

Would be nice if PP wasn't needed but I think without it no promoted team would be able to buy the sort of players needed to have a chance to stay up. Just be 3 teams getting spanked by everyone else for the season.

[@BoliveiraNTPW]

With how much money United pays to their players, not a surprise they would be against.

[@sansire746]

I see this as a win

[@tmlarkynado7604]

For me it's a massive loss

[@sansire746]

@@tmlarkynado7604 wait is it not, seems like a decent way to control the spending, and they can still keep the caps high since the premier league has lots of money rolling around

[@kevinwolfenden4685]

the biggest clubs in England will just buy a player from the smallest for 250m, cap removed!

[@treasuren]

Brother, if Barcelona don't have a salary cap, why did they let Messi leave on a free after that emotional press conference?? All La Liga clubs have a salary cap. It's even in FM

[@SirEEf13]

Reading the title of this video I had this false hope that this salary cap would just come on top of PSR and sort of function like a restraint that keeps the big clubs from just throwing wage money around. Sort of like tying PSR even tighter but more for the top clubs. Turns out this apparently is a proposal that I don't understand the reason for on multiple levels. A loose-loose for everybody I can imagine right now. All it is is inviting new big money investors to just buy up the PL clubs and spend money. But what if those new investor clubs then get relegated? How many of those investors will actually stick around and care about their club once it has gone down a tier?

[@higgnkfe]

What am I missing; a "cap" limits how much you can spend, but you can't spend what you don't have. Like Nottingham can spend up to 600 million, but they can't spend money they don't have, and they don't have 600 million, so why is there panic over Nottingham ruining themselves financially. Also re competitive balance in Europe, you don't think the rest of Europe might follow a similar basis? And that creating more competitive parity in the Premier league isn't going to benefit the league as a whole?

[@williamcross210]

Do you have a credit card or have you bought a house on credit? Every person and business spends money they don't have based non the hope of future revenues

[@justaguywithapowerpole]

Do kent and fenerbahe video 5 of askjng

[@Tminus31]

At least 20 years too late

[@kariminOo]

La Liga does have salary cap..

[@JustSomeDudee]

No, no. As a brit, BBC definitely means what you think it means.

[@torodfs7593]

wow a BBC joke from Z, welcome to 2024

[@ya2u]

If it hurts man city I'm all for it

[@akunwanneprosper7016]

That's cool 😁

[@guguy00]

Something something fell off go for a run etc etc

[@erikplotz183]

Who is this babyfaced guy and what has he done to Zeeland?