Zoom vs Prime Side by Side Test! Which is Best?

[@davidchmelik3328]

Díky!

[@Duade]

Thanks David, I appreciate the support, Cheers, Duade

[@ppww6076]

The light through the grass made the shot of the little bird at the end - beautiful.

[@Duade]

Thanks, it appears that shot was a favourite of many. Cheers, Duade 👍

[@michaelktori5178]

The Cisticola in the grass is a lovely natural picture and the light is gorgeous.

[@Duade]

Thanks Michael, it was a real bonus at the end of the session, Cheers, Duade

[@_benjimouse_]

Agreed, it's a lovely shot. Of the others I prefer the prime shots.

[@Duade]

@@_benjimouse_ Thanks Alistair, Cheers, Duade

[@burn5394]

Thanks!

[@Duade]

Thanks Burn 53, I appreciate the support, Cheers, Duade

[@brendanhayes5565]

Thanks

[@Duade]

Thanks Brendan, I really appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@jiggyb21]

The way you move from video to finished photo to RAW file is so unique and so informative. It's a more effective approach for me in some psychological way. I don't think I can explain really what I mean but I will just say that flowing from the finished photo into the RAW, as opposed to the other way around, seems much better as a teaching aid, to me at least. I have never seen another photographer present things like that. I really connect with the way you explain things.

[@Duade]

Thank you, I appreciate the feedback, I am glad it helps. Cheers, Duade

[@BayouJosh]

Beautiful work Duade.

[@Duade]

Thanks mate, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@WernerBirdNature]

G'day mate ! Once again a great joy to watch !! In the beginning while it's still dark, you seem to be scaring away some kangaroos, but later they return for some very sweet poses :-D And the birds were in all interpretations Duade-level ;-) Because of versatility and weight, in combination with the newest cameras dealing much better with low light and slower glass, zooms are certainly gaining territory. And in this versatility corner, I recently encountered cases where I was using a 2x on my 100-400Lii and needed to zoom out again to like 300mm to avoid clipping wings when a blue heron was close and started flying. With the in general better 100-500 this would not be possible with any extender mounted on it. I'm really rooting for Canon to bring us their patented 300-800L/8 (which might be a fixed aperture lens to save weight, and which I expect at a similar price and weight as the 100-500). That would be an awesome complementary lens to both 100-400 and 100-500, as well as good killer for the 200-600 from the competition. With the R7 in mind, I loved your Heron comparison where R6+1.4+500 and R5-cropped+500 have about the same amount of pixels on the bird. And first sight the R5 image looked sharper, but that increased sharpness was mainly in the background because as far as bokeh is concerned, we were seeing 700mm against 500mm (and not 800mm). And this was a bigger bokeh difference than I expected. Very similar, the R6 with a 2x will have the same amount of pixels on the bird as the R7, regardless of the used lens. This video already predicts the R6 plus 2x will clearly win the bokeh contest against the R7. The open question will be how the R7 will perform in low light, and whether here the higher pixel density or the sensor will come at bigger IQ penalty compared to adding a 2x on the R6 ..

[@Duade]

Thanks Werner, yes the 100-500 restriction with a 1.4 is huge design flaw and very annoying. Yes, I was surprised with the DOF difference also but to be expected I guess comparing 700mm vs 500mm as you mentioned. The R7 RF100-500 wont get the same background that is for sure but the bird should have plenty of detail. I look forward to comparing the R7 to the R5/R6 to see where it has an advantage or weakness. Cheers, Duade

[@WernerBirdNature]

@@Duade Maybe this was a specific case where the DOF difference was more obvious than some other cases: when the heron had just one meter more distance from the background (meaning one meter closer to you), it might already have been less visible. But when 700mm vs 500mm can already be this visible, than 800mm vs 400mm will be obvious in more cases still ..

[@carlosalexandresouza5816]

Oh, guy! It's very nice to see these smiles in your face! It's really great to spend time in the nature! Great video!

[@Duade]

Thanks Carlos, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@Shalin_Modi]

Habitat shot looked beautiful 🤩

[@Duade]

Thanks Shalin, Cheers, Duade

[@LouisaLee63]

Interesting comparison. I keep thinking about getting a prime lens but the versatility of a zoom (and the cost) is hard to beat. And considering how much better the zoom lens image quality has improved over the last few years it may be some time before I do get a prime. And as always thank you for including your raw images with the edits! I learn a lot seeing the difference between the two.

[@Duade]

Thanks Louisa, yes, zooms just continue to improve over time and are very good, Cheers, Duade

[@RogerJones-mountfield]

Very jealous of your wildlife, down under, you’ve got some great captures there Duade, interesting video thank you 🙏

[@Duade]

Thanks Roger, we sure do, Cheers, Duade

[@stevechan5569]

Look forward to seeing the final released details of the R7.

[@Duade]

Me too Steve, I just hope it's a new sensor and not the one from the 90D, don't like my chances though. Cheers, Duade

[@stevechan5569]

@@Duade In Canada, the D90, RP, and R6 are retailing at $1,500, $1,600, and $3,200 respectively. I speculate the R7 will be around $2,000 with the old D90 sensor, $2,400 with a new or enhanced sensor? I think Canon wants too much money either way. My 2 cents.

[@Duade]

@@stevechan5569 I suspect it will be around that 2400-2800 range. Canon seem to be putting a premium on most things these days. Cheers, Duade

[@dougsturgess2651]

Love how you showed the final images set on the RAW. Nice!

[@Duade]

Thanks Doug, I appreciate the feedback, Cheers, Duade

[@thescouser8629]

Been using Zooms for several years and now have Canon 200-400 and recently purchased 100-500. Main reason is that much of my photography requires focal length versatility-hides and stalking. I remember working with otters on the shore. My companion had a fixed 500 and ended up with just head shots whereas I could frame the otter in a variety of ways. The 100-500 is becoming my go to lens- weight and quality

[@Duade]

Thanks, totally agree, the zooms allow you to take different types of shots, Cheers, Duade

[@kenjensen5930]

Just to mention Duade that the prime also gives you the benefit of wider apertures so that you can shoot for longer in poor light - very important with our UK climate!

[@Duade]

Very true Ken, Cheers, Duade

[@brentj7564]

favorite shot is bird on way back to truck. Already own the 100-500, can't wait for the R7! Excellent photos (really well done post processing)

[@Duade]

Thanks Brent, yes the R7 looks very interesting, Cheers, Duade

[@ronp4529]

Love the shot of the Golden-headed Cisticola in the grass, such a beautiful little scene. Always look forward to your videos - you’re capturing much more than birds, the sense of amazement and gratitude is palpable. Thanks for sharing.

[@Duade]

Thanks Ron, I am glad that comes across, I really do love this hobby, Cheers, Duade

[@TimvanderLeeuw]

I like the “habitat” shots, I think it’s more natural. About zoom lenses, I think another advantage of zoom lenses is that they make it easier to find the bird in your viewfinder by zooming out to get a wider view, then zooming in for the shot once you have the bird in view.

[@Duade]

Thanks Tim, totally agree, I just used the 800 on the R7 and it was a bit of a nightmare trying to find close birds. Cheers, Duade

[@danielthomas7747]

Again and again, thank you for such interesting video. I would have loved to use the crop mode on my R5 in combination of my new RF100-500. It is autumn here in Sweden days are getting shorter... So I believe I will have the opportunity to test the crop mode this winter in a sunny day... It is quite nice birds especially in February... When I look at your videos I see lot of passion that you share... Thank you for this. 😊

[@Duade]

It is my pleasure Daniel, have fun with your R5, our days are getting warmer down here but we have had a lot of rain that is for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@danielthomas7747]

@@Duade Sweden is a beautiful country for wildlife... I need to take more time to follow my passion and progress. Cheers.

[@dreadflaw]

I really dig that last habitat shot! amazing as usual Duade =)

[@Duade]

Thanks Daniel, Cheers, Duade

[@woodymeristem2223]

Years ago I used only prime lenses because the image quality of zooms was quite poor. Now, except for macro, I only use zoom lenses -- much more versatile, smaller, lighter and less expensive; their image quality is more than adequate for my purposes. Have always enjoyed your videos and seeing the birds from "down under", please keep up the good work.

[@Duade]

Thanks Woody, I agree, the quality of the latest zooms is really quite remarkable. Cheers, Duade

[@darrendavy4248]

Great video, loved the white face Heron, really like the habitat shot, great images as always, thank you, Darren.

[@Duade]

Thanks Darren, Cheers, Duade

[@Thom_S]

Always enjoy your videos. Love seeing the pleasure you get while shooting birds. I get the same feeling from landscape photography. Keep up the great work!

[@Duade]

Thanks Tom, great to hear, its funny how we all love photography but many of us like different styles which is great. Cheers, Duade

[@aramarsh]

That was a fruitful day out..! so many great captures Duade, very nice. I enjoyed the comparison between Prime and Zoom, love your work, cheers Andrew.

[@Duade]

Thanks Andrew, I appreciate the support mate. Cheers, Duade

[@celeselopez7373]

I love the versatility of the zoom lens. Also really appreciate photos that include habitat. Your surprise shot as you were walking was lovely

[@Duade]

Thanks Celese, yes, it was a bonus, Cheers, Duade

[@ceesnabuursfauna2115]

Jan Wegener made a good remark regarding the R7, how high can we go with the ISO compared to the R6 and R5. I think that is the most important thing about that camera, the other spec's look good.

[@Duade]

Thanks, I will be testing the R7 when I can get a copy, Cheers, Duade

[@erkkisiekkinen286]

Thank You again for a stellar review. Now I made a big move and traded all my Sony gear to Canon EF 600mm ll ,it is expensive but in perfect condition. So now I have both options ,my RF zooms are 100-500mm and the light 100-400mm. My bodies are R6 mark ll and the old 10mpx 40D. Maybe Im gonna miss my fantastic Sony gear but the 600mm ll was like new ,so could not resist ....

[@airsearescueguy]

Good morning from Vancouver Island in BC Duade. Enjoyed your video this morning and decided to do something similar heading out today. Mounted my RF 100 to 500 on my R5 and my EF 500 on my 7D2. So far pretty quiet for my target bird, the Pacific Loon. Noted your cover for this video says 700mm vs 700mm but as you mentioned in the video the 500mm at 1.6 is actually 800mm equivalent. Just so you know we pay attention. All the best.

[@Duade]

Nice to hear you are out and about with your gear. My wifes family are from BC and her grandparents were from VI. Yes, I used a few different focal lengths and different field of views. In the end with the 1.4 converter on the 100-500 had 700mm focal length which when times by 1.6 gives us 1120 field of view which is pretty crazy. Cheers, Duade

[@BIGNatureBoy]

@@Duade Yes I see you did use a converter on the 100-500 as well as the crop setting. Thx. Rain stopped, light was great but the loons stayed at least 1 km away! Will try again later in the week. Cheers mate.

[@mustafakasapoglu]

I have no idea how did you manage with two cameras plus the cameras that you use for capturing yourself. Thank you so much for great comparison demonstration.

[@Duade]

Thanks Mustafa, yes a challenge but very enjoyable. Cheers, Duade

[@nallontrails]

Considering you are a one man army; I mean you set up tripod and walk in to the frame than someone follows you with camera is awesome 👏👏👏🙏🙏🙏

[@Duade]

Thanks Nallon, it is a lot of fun that is for sure :-)

[@nallontrails]

@@Duade your commitment is nothing less than legendary.

[@SeanNeale]

Habitat shot in the reeds was my favourite. Another great video!

[@Duade]

Thanks Sean, seems to be the consensus so far, Cheers, Duade

[@dance2jam]

Both shots (habitat and isolation) are terrific. If I had to pick one, the habitat shot would be it. Lovely. Thanks for the video.

[@Duade]

Thanks, it appears to be the most popular shot for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@dance2jam]

@@Duade Took one (Night Heron hunting in the grass) in the spirit of your photo - and I love it. The animal eye detect AF was key in the Nikon Z9 - as the heron face became visible between reeds of grass, I was able to get the eye sharp. Have to love the new tech at making the job easier to get the photos you want. PS: I also took my zoom with the 600mm f/4 because of your video. Thanks for the suggestions.

[@ggabovich]

Absolutely amazing video my friend. Great shots. Best regards, Guy.

[@Duade]

Thanks Guy, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@djack4125]

Duade, why would you use crop mode with the R5 or any full-frame? Crop mode does not put more MPs on your subject. We can accomplish the same effect by simply cropping in post. Also, crop mode on a full-frame restricts the available AF area. Is there a benefit that I am missing?

[@Duade]

The only benefit I can think of is the bird is bigger in the EVF which may help people to find it and perhaps focus on it easier. The smaller files would also increase the buffer. But for me I don't use it as I would prefer cropping in post. I think I used it in this video to highlight what an APSC body like the R7 would look like as I did not have the R7 at the time. Cheers, Duade

[@davidskinner274]

Habitat shots for me if the grasses or leaves do not distract too much and the main body, eye of the bird is in focus

[@Duade]

Thanks David, it is a real skill to nail those habitat shots. Cheers, Duade

[@kimberlystarr6375]

Love the habitat shot!

[@Duade]

Thanks Kimberly, seems to be everyones favourite. Cheers, Duade

[@billy4byrnes]

Great video Duade, love your work!

[@Duade]

Thanks Billy, Cheers, Duade

[@bruceholmes8010]

Duade thanks again for a great video. I like how you used the IFOOTAGE 71" Carbon Fiber Camera Monopod - Tripod. I bought one and have gone out 4-5 times now with it and just love using it for my Canon 6D and Sigma 150-600 as I tend to walk and shoot. No more back aching after 3-4 hours of camera and lens on my neck. If I come to an area, I still can "get low" and can use the Tripod as you showed. I like the zoom myself and will be very interested in an R5 and R7 comparison as you did with each having a 100-500 lens when the R7 becomes readily available. I myself generally prefer habitat shots. The Canon R5, the Canon RF100-5000 lens, and add the 1.4 Converter - seems almost a perfect combo and really seems hard to beat, but there is cost as you know. As much as I enjoy going out and shooting I would hate to say maybe I should have gotten the R5 vs R7 - as in buyers remorse. I will be doing a lot of research in the next several months as people use and review the R7 before I "pay the bill" on whatever choice I make. So will see as Christmas is still months away :) Again always appreciate these types of comparisons and real working results. Thank You.

[@Duade]

Thanks Bruce, great to hear the monopod is helping reduce that weight out in the field. I agree they are very useful when walking around. Good strategy waiting to see how the R7 turns out, I will be getting it an doing some videos so hopefully I will be able to answer any questions you might have. Cheers, Duade

[@MarioSeveri]

Great video, as always, Duade. Great shots also, and I really like the photo of the Golden-headed Cisticola, those vertical lines of the grass adds to the atmosphere of the photo. But apart from the photos, it just seems so great to be out there and see all this wildlife. I would enjoy that even without taking any photo :-).

[@Duade]

Thanks, yes, it was a wonderful morning to be sure, Cheers, Duade

[@bassplayer60]

Love the shot of the White Faced Heron in flight....I like the zoom...the versatility in shots...THank you! =D

[@Duade]

Thanks, yes, I was happy to nail that shot, Cheers, Duade

[@MrWDCash]

Wonderful. It looks like every birdd shooter in the world is on the edge of their seat for the R7 , well you and I are anyway. I think your right, the r7 and a good zoom 100-400 , 100-500 or 150-600 and I would be good to go. oh yeah, I seem to be a fan of habitat shots. I like the clean blured backgrounds but find I keep making more with habitats.

[@Duade]

Thanks, yes, I can't wait, fingers crossed there is not a long waiting time. Cheers, Duade

[@deanpratley125]

Loved the bird in the reeds. The crane taking off was awesome. I don’t know enough about the prime and the zoom to say anything about them. Ill need to do a little research.

[@Duade]

Thanks Dean, yes that was a bonus at the end of the day. Cheers, Duade

[@denisesavage2382]

I’ve pretty much enjoyed the versatility of the zooms. Great video showing how both can work in the field.

[@Duade]

Thanks Denise, yes the zooms are very good, Cheers, Duade

[@dn-bayou]

I'm new to the channel, and other than the amazing work filming these videos and the quality advice, i just love the fact that you show both final and RAW images so we can get a better idea of the whole process of shooting and editing ... simply amazing ❤️

[@Duade]

Thanks A.B I appreciate the feedback, I'm glad to hear you enjoy the raw overlay. Cheers, Duade

[@dn-bayou]

@@Duade your work is truly inspiring sir :)

[@maxiguppy]

Lovely video! It's nice to see photos of habitat as well, especially for person not from Australia :). What kind of cover you have on zoom lens? :) Keep up the great work!

[@Duade]

Thanks mate, I appreciate the support, I got it from China via Aliexpress, its 3M so quality is great but it takes a long time to come via post and it takes a long long time to apply as it's like a jigsaw puzzle. I think you maybe able to get the same thing a little more expensive and quicker elsewhere. www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002941757172.html Cheers, Duade

[@itaylorm]

Thank you for your comparison here. I have contemplated in the past the difference between a 100-500 and 500 lens. Very helpful. Also very helpful that you show how you shoot and then crop

[@Duade]

Thanks Taylor, I am happy to hear it was helpful and you are enjoying the content, Cheers, Duade

[@romellopez1691]

Great video! Love the cisticola shot!

[@Duade]

Thanks Romel, I do too, Cheers, Duade

[@Prepared_Suburbanite]

Outstanding video! You do such a great job explaining your technique and what a great eye you have! I do agree that the zoom is much more versatile.

[@Duade]

Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it, Cheers, Duade

[@dimitristsagdis7340]

I used to shoot wild life with two bodies a FF and a crop. One body would have a long prime (600) and the other a shorter zoom (100-400 or 70-200). I suspect a lot depends on how far/large are your subjects. Both FF/crop and prime/zoom have their place I don't see this as either or. If money/weight wasn't an issue I would go for two FF bodies. So that the controls, raws, etc. are the same. But a second R5 is too expensive. This will be the main reason I would consider an R7.

[@Duade]

Thanks Dimitris, yes there are lots of variables that is for sure, I really do hope the R7 matches our expectations. Cheers, Duade

[@willherondale6367]

Fab video Duade, beautiful shots as always. Can't wait to see you test the R7 and 100-500 as it's going to be my next setup :)

[@Duade]

Thanks Will, I look forward to trying out that combo for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@HeathFoley]

Excellent comparison video Duade, thank you. I'm curious where you got that lens skin for the RF100-500?

[@Duade]

Thanks Heath, I got it from China via Alibaba, its 3M so quality is great but it takes a long time to come via post and it takes a long long time to apply as it's like a jigsaw puzzle. I think you maybe able to get the same thing a little more expensive and quicker elsewhere. www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002941757172.html Cheers, Duade

[@pasky7777]

Teleconverters get a bad reputation but you use them to great effect!!! impressive at 13:55

[@Duade]

Thank you, they only work on good glass, both these lenses are L series and can take TC pretty well. Cheers, Duade

[@skakdosmer]

On a perch or in the environment? I think both have their advantages. By the way, at 12:44 The on-screen text says "whate faced heron". Never heard of that one.

[@Duade]

Thanks Lau, I agree, thanks for the pickup, unfortunately I am unable to edit once uploaded, Cheers, Duade

[@garymc8956]

Great description of some of my classic dilemmas; 500 at f4 or zoom to 500 at 5.6. Crop or full frame, TC or no? Light levels, shutter speed, ISO, stationary, action - so many variables. Nice solution - 2 kits side by side, until you need to move - doh! Never a single answer; usually just a best guess for the situation and go with it. Thanks!

[@Duade]

Thanks Gary, yes, there is no one perfect solution, I think the R7 RF100-500 will make for a wonderful combo. Cheers, Duade

[@garymann499]

Excellent review. I have a two 300MM & 500MM but like using a 100/400MM as I so much more flexible.

[@Duade]

Thanks Gary, yes, the more I use the RF100-500 the more I realise the shots I was missing on the prime. Cheers, Duade

[@garymann499]

@@Duade I have also missed a lot of wildlife & sports images using prime lenses but I still like the quality you get from them. 👍🏻😃

[@Duade]

@@garymann499 Yeah, its a hard choice isn't it, Cheers, Duade

[@larrydurkee5741]

As usual, very informative. Thanks Duade. I have my R6 attached to my 500mm f4 but I am finding I rarely take a shot with it since I paired the RF100-400 and 1.4 TC on the R5. I really like the weight difference. I wanted the 500mm for so long and finally bought a good used one five years ago I hate to abandoned it. I am thinking the light weight 100-400 that you previewed might get used more often. We’ll see. Keep up the great videos.🇨🇦👏🏻

[@larrydurkee5741]

That should say RF100-500 and 1.4 TC on the R5.

[@Duade]

Thanks Larry, yes, the weight and size make it a pleasure. I too have found myself reaching for the zoom out of convenience and ease of use. Cheers, Duade

[@beviolet1969]

Hello there,i always enjoying your great video’s….and i am all so saving for the RF100-500 lens😊. Question for you is: Do you need the monitor on the camera with the the extender setup plus crop mode? Love all things in nature by the way❤

[@Duade]

Ben, no the monitor is something I use to record my viewfinder for KZbin, Cheers, Duade

[@beviolet1969]

@@Duade thx very mucho and have a great time in nature man❤

[@chrispowell2126]

Hi Duade, Great Video, you got the balance perfect between the gear and the in the field experience, I really like your in the field practical demo’s. Your enthusiasm really shines through. Thank you

[@Duade]

Thanks Chris, glad it comes across that way. Cheers, Duade

[@raypegram805]

Cheers for another great demonstration and taking the time, is much appreciated. I actually like the wrap on your 100 - 500, might invest in some.

[@Duade]

Thanks Ray, I got mine from China and took a little while to come but the quality is excellent being 3M. It was like a giant puzzle and took a number of hours to put on, much longer than I had anticipated. But it should protect the lens which is why I did it. Got it from here bit.ly/3szEINM Cheers, Duade

[@henrikboch1257]

Once again a nice video from down under. What brand is the camo cover on your 100-500?

[@Duade]

Henrik, its a 3m sticker that I got from China via Alibaba, it is a great product but takes a number of hours and patience to apply, I am also not that happy with the colour and design but they have a number of different options. You can check it out here, just be prepared to wait awhile for it to arrive. Cheers, Duade bit.ly/3szEINM

[@nallontrails]

I like the way you edit. Not over post to lose the natural look.

[@Duade]

Thanks for the feedback, Cheers, Duade

[@woodygreen6826]

For what it's worth, I liked the bird in the grass shot a lot. I try to get shots like that at times, and it can be hit or miss, but it's always worth the effort. Zoom vs Tele, I usually have my 500mm prime on the body I am carrying, and another body with a 100-400 zoom in my backpack. There are days that the zoom set up never comes out of the backpack, but its handy when I need it. :) Great video as always.

[@Duade]

Thanks Woody, that seems to be the overwhelming favourite of the morning which is interesting. Great that you have two kits to choose from. Cheers, Duade

[@Dman-ev7qn]

Love the video. watched while having breakfast and felt like I was on a little trip What camouflage is on your 100-500 lens?

[@Duade]

Thanks Dman, the wrap is found here www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002941757172.html it is from China so the post is very slow and it is like a jigsaw puzzle putting it together. Cheers, Duade

[@brucegraner5901]

I liked your habitat shot towards the end. Actually, I would have been pleased had I taken all of the images you showed. Obviously the bokeh created by a prime helps make even an "ordinary" bird photo look special but I prefer the flexibility of a zoom. With all the specialty digital "filters" built into superzoom cameras I wonder how hard it would be for software engineers to create a "prime bokeh" digital filter for crop sensor cameras?

[@Duade]

Thanks Bruce, yes, that last shot was great, the more I use a zoom the more I enjoy that flexibility. Cheers, Duade

[@marksuchomelsr6698]

While the nice portrait shots are beautiful, I also like the more environmental shots, showing the birds in they’re element

[@Duade]

Thanks Mark, I too am starting to like the habitat style more and more, Cheers, Duade

[@soumitraghosh29]

Super content.. as always…. Would keen to see a content based on your post processing.

[@Duade]

Thanks Soumitra, I will look at doing one in the future. Cheers, Duade

[@marcushellyer6502]

Great video again. To answer your question, I'll take a habitat shot over a portrait shot devoid of context any day. For me it's nature photography - I want to give a sense of the bird in its natural environment, preferably doing its natural behaviours. The portrait shot with the bokeh-ed background is a fetish that doesn't do it for me.

[@Duade]

Thanks Marcus, I appreciate the feedback and appreciate your input. I am happily exploring my photography at the moment trying to include more habitat when I can. I think the zoom lens has been a real breath of fresh air and has allowed me to try different shots. Cheers, Duade

[@marximus4]

Great shots. The R7 is an interesting proposition. Do you plan on selling one of the full-frame bodies if you get the R7, or getting it as a supplement?

[@Duade]

I will see how I go with it first, I use the R6 as my video camera these days so it may go on the shelf. Cheers, Duade

[@klaustomasini]

Congrats, your vlog is always amazing, Duade. I prefer both prime and zoom, depends what I want to shoot.

[@Duade]

Thanks Klaus, yes it's great to have an option of both. Cheers, Duade 👍

[@colintraveller]

Top drawer as always ,,,,,, Prime is for fixed stationary targets Where'as the Zoom is for moving targets because you can move the lense to compensate the Target you are capturing .. it's how i view the difference between such lenses . Mind you I wish i could afford an expensive lense Question for all ... With inflation affect prices .. and increasing Energy bills .. Is such price rises .. affecting your intended gear purchases and is it making it harder for you to save .

[@Duade]

Thanks Colin, yes, there are pros and cons for both. Yep, inflation is heading to 6% down here this year which makes it a lot harder for everything, especially as wages are not rising by the same amount. Cheers, Duade

[@colintraveller]

@@Duade Likewise prices are increasing here but the wages aren't ...

[@Don_from_cairns_australia]

Thanks Duade I could watch these videos all day. It’s either or for me I liked photos from both the prime and the zoom they are both winners. I recently purchased from KEH in the States A 1990s era Sigma 400EF prime And a pro master 2x converter. I’m enjoying this set up as much as I do the Canon L-series primes Thanks I appreciate all your content

[@Duade]

Thanks Magoo, congrats on the new gear, sounds like fun. Cheers, Duade 👍

[@olibertosoto5470]

Hi Duade. Got into bird photography about a year ago and what a pain but fun! Like your philosophy on this subject - it's obvious you like being there and that you are capable of taking what you have to it's full potential and that's reward enough. I follow that same mindset. With my d7200 and my much older nikkor 80-400 there are only 2 things that truly get under my skin: that too often need for just a bit more reach and that really slow and hesitant focus. That can ruin the moment but not the day. Looking into tamron or sigma 150-600 options - that takes care of the reach and maybe the focus will improve. Given one choice, wouldn't give up the versatility of a zoom for the perfection of a prime even if I could afford one.

[@Duade]

The Sigma 150-600C is a good value lens that will give you plenty of reach. The AF is not as good as the latest models but for its price is fine. Good luck ,Cheers, Duade

[@KelpiesRock]

Yep,like the habitat shots best.🤠

[@Duade]

Thanks Sharon, Cheers, Duade 👍

[@haaveri_]

Great videos! What mini camera tripods you are using? :)

[@Duade]

I am using the iFootage Cobra 2 Low Profile Minipod and a groundpod from naturescapes. Cheers, Duade

[@mayhamilton6652]

Loved this video! What a variety at one watering hole. I really liked the habitat shot at the end. I'm thinking a zoom might be the best for me for a bit more versatility.

[@Duade]

Thanks May, yes, the zoom is much more versatile, Cheers, Duade

[@luisa9628]

I recently picked up a canon refurb 400 5.6 after watching several of your videos mentioning it. So light! And with a Wimberley monopod gimbal the lack of stabilization isn't much of a problem. I hope they redo this one for RF with some added IS. Thanks for the content.

[@Duade]

Congrats on the new lens Lius, for its price it is great value, yes it has its weaknesses but if you accommodate them with a tripod or higher SS then its fine. Yes, I have often wished they updated this lens but it appears zooms are far more popular. Cheers, Duade

[@kennethroberts1292]

Great vídeo Duade! Thank! I personally preffer zoom as there is much more flexibility! Cheers from Tierra del Fuego, Argentina!

[@kennethroberts1292]

Thanks*

[@Duade]

Thanks Kenneth, yes, I agree the zooms are very flexible, Cheers, Duade

[@jamesseward9263]

I agree with you that the zoom offers more latitude and creativity. With the Heron it’s a good thing that you could exit crop mode to get the shot which you can’t do on the R7! Lol! With that said I’m going to get the R7 and use it on my 100-400 which doesn’t have the limitations of the 100-500. You also made me think about the Sony 200-600 and the versatility that would offer using the Sony a6600 or any full frame camera. I just wish I could adapt the Sony to my Canon camera like I could adapt my Canon lenses to Sony bodies! Lol!

[@Duade]

Thanks James, yes, I think if I had the R7 I would likely avoid using the 1.4 due to that limitation unless I knew the bird wouldn't come close. Yes, the Sony 200-600 is wonderful and if Sony released a modern APSC camera with eye tracking I would be tempted to pick up that combo. Cheers, Duade

[@koolkutz7]

You got some great images of some beautiful birds there Duade. My favourite is the Australasian Grebe, little stunners! Having done wildlife photography for about 10 years I prefer using a zoom lens over a prime for the versatility.

[@Duade]

Thanks Steve, yes, the zoom is very flexible that is for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@Duade]

Thanks Steve, yes the zoom is very flexible, Cheers, Duade 👍

[@utubify100]

Another nice, interesting video, Duade. Appreciate you creating & sharing. I thought the 100-500mm zoom did quite well in comparison to the prime, even with extender & crop format. I don't think I'd hardly ever hesitate to shoot that lens. Of course, in variable situations, the flexibility is very compelling. I liked the "LBJ" shot in the grass and find myself shooting what you call habitat shots, most of the time. As always, some great video and stills...think the kangaroos, heron, spoonbill & grebes were among the favorites this time. It's very cool that you take the time to pursue this passion you have - few better aspects to life, I believe. Enjoy the next outing & thanks again ~

[@Duade]

Thank you so much for the support and taking the time to leave such a great comment, I appreciate it. Cheers, Duade

[@DJBastor]

Hi Duade, great comparision between those settings. The converter on the 100-500 is in my optinion a disadvantage cause you can use it at 300mm at the short end first. I got the 100-400 ii and the 1.4 and 2.0 converter. i can use the complete focal length. Stay save greetings

[@Duade]

Thanks Marc, totally agree, that is the biggest weakness by far of the 100-500. I am hoping with the R7 having 160-800mm FOV should be enough without converters. I used the 100-400 recently and was surprised how well it worked on mirrorless. A great lens for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@Lil-JensStudio]

After watching this video, I did my own test using my Canon R and the RF 100-500 attached to a 1.4x extender. Without digging into the technical details, setting a camera to a crop sensor mode mostly makes sense if your images will remain in digital form- as in posted online, used for desktop backgrounds, edited into a video, or shared on social media. What I found in my particular set up, was that the crop sensor mode cut the RAW file size by about 55 percent. (Using dual Pixel made no measurable difference, nor did the scaled back CRAW setting.) Even converting them to a 300dpi tif file left the final size of the image less than half the size of the full sensor mode. With that in mind, they will still print fine up to about 8x10 inches but the cropped images begin to deteriorate as I pressed them up to 11x14 inches and beyond. Basically, to use or not use the crop mode comes down to the intended use of the final image. There are also other issues when it comes to substantial edits that may or may not be required. Smaller files means fewer pixels on the pallet which therefore limits some fine tuning options in post editing. If I had to choose between a small perfect image or a large one that needed some work, I would go with the larger one every time without hesitation. (And yes, I am well versed in using Topaz Gigapixel but even that amazing tool has it's limits.) As for the prime lenses, I can afford them but I opted for the vastly more versatile (and much lighter on a hike) zoom lens. There are dozens of shooting scenarios where the 100-500 is more than adequate compared to perhaps a handful where a prime lens would make a substantial difference.

[@Duade]

Mate, totally agree and I personally don't use the crop mode as I prefer to crop in post and try to keep my images bigger then 4000px. I used the crop mode in this video to highlight what the R7 field of view will look like and that you can if needed use the 17mp R5 crop mode if you wanted say a higher buffer, smaller files. Also agree about what purpose we are using the photos for, I am quite happy to crop heavily to display on the web etc but like you say printed images are much better if we have adequate resolution to start with. Cheers, Duade

[@aeroptical]

Great video Duade, the videography with the drone shots at the start was as epic as the light! I'm praying that the r7's sensor ISO is on par with the r6/r7. I would prefer the r7 as 90%+ of my shots are cropped. Rumour has it that the sensor is the same as the d90, I really hope that isn't the case as the ISO isn't great. All the best!

[@Duade]

Thanks Ruairi, I too hope the R7 has an updated 32mp sensor but somehow I think we will get the 90D sensor. I suspect it will be between 1-2 stops worse then the R6 in low light conditions. I will be getting the camera as soon as I can and the ISO test will be one of the first things I compare. Cheers, Duade

[@aeroptical]

@@Duade Top man, Duade!

[@photoapeal]

The RF 100-500 is a great lens but I do notice that it defines the background more. I prefer the prime since you can get smoother creamy backgrounds which provides a better backdrop. When a duck fly’s up in front of the trees the sticks in the background are less defined with the prime. I do enjoy using the RF100-500 I’d say sharpness is almost on par, you’d be hard pressed to determine which is the prime & which was shot with the zoom. Low light situation’s the f/4 prime is going to be a better choice. People can do well these days with just a quality zoom, probably not worth the price for a prime unless it’s your living.

[@Duade]

Thanks Johnathan, yes, the DOF is a noticeable difference for sure and the prime will always blur that background much better. But as you say for the price it is hard to beat. Cheers, Duade

[@adrian_div_photography]

Great job as always Duade. I currently own the beautiful 100-500. Cant wait to pair it with the new r7 for that bit more reach and also more mp to allow further cropping in post. Very exciting!

[@Duade]

Thanks Adrian, likewise, should be a wonderful combo. Cheers, Duade

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

As a happy R5+RF100-500 owner, I still lust for the EF600mm f4 II as I find myself wanting more bokeh and light - especially in the morning hours - but for now really can’t afford it.

[@Duade]

Yes, the big primes are so expensive but do offer a different look that is for sure. Your combo is fantastic though, Cheers, Duade

[@bruceterrill8730]

Hi Duade, great info as usual, although I'm always trying to convert your info to Nikon 'speak'. .. Could you please identify and supply a link to the camo skin that you have your 100-500mm lens wrapped in please? Thanks mate. Bruce.

[@Duade]

Bruce, I got the camo from China via Alibaba so be prepared to wait awhile, it is also very time consuming to apply but will protect the lens. The product works very well but I am not that happy with the camo I got, just a bit too purple and bright. There are other options though that might be better. Cheers, Duade bit.ly/3szEINM

[@bruceterrill8730]

@@Duade Thanks Duade, nothing there for any of my Nikon Lenses. . .

[@welsh5546]

hi, loving the channel, very inspiring, i am quite new to this hobby and overwhelmed with all the camera and lens options, any advice on what to look for or any recommendations?

[@Duade]

It really depends on what you want to photograph and what your budget is, how much did you want to spend all up? Cheers, Duade

[@welsh5546]

@@Duade mostly wildlife as live near a few national trust reserves, looking at mid range price, thanks for replying

[@Duade]

@@welsh5546 I think Mirrorless is the future so the upcoming R7 and RF100-500 or perhaps the Sony A74 and Sony 200-600. A more affordable option would be say the upcoming R10 and RF100-400 or perhaps a DSLR with the Nikon D500 and Sigma 150-600C being a great option. Cheers, Duade

[@tojadmka]

Great video. And what type of lens coat is this on the 100-500?

[@Duade]

I picked it up from here www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002941757172.html It is in China so postage is very slow but quality was fine. Also it takes a few hours to put on and is like a puzzle. Cheers, Duade

[@kimraymond2749]

Hi Duade, A joy to watch even if a person has never picked up a camera. The cisticola is wonderful because of the mystical atmosphere. I too like a little more context. I am still on my starter camera, a bridge camera with a 600mm equivalent zoom. but the limitations are creeping up on me. I like the little birds and after hundreds of shots of wrens I have only a few keepers. I am thinking that an entry level APSC or micro 4/3 with a budget zoom may take the quality up a notch without sacrificing mobility. My budget is very very tight (< $2000) and weight is an issue. Maybe your viewers have some suggestions?

[@Duade]

G'day Kim, I will be testing the R10 and RF100-400 which would be a great kit for wildlife. Cheers, Duade

[@kimraymond2749]

@@Duade Thanks. I will research this option. I looked back at your video using 40D and Sigma 150-600mm. I then started researching 70D prices. There are plenty of used ones around. I just wonder about the weight with a Sigma because I expect to mostly shot hand held and at 68 my hands aren't that steady anymore.

[@rolfmoeckli769]

Great video as always, I'd prefer Zoom.

[@Duade]

Thanks Rolf, yes, they are more versatile that is for sure. Cheers, Duade

[@petrisonkeri9604]

Hi Duade, i really like your videos and your photos. While looking this last video i was wondering if you have ever made a video on your photo editing. I like your colors compared to original RAW and wonder if you have any favorite LR presets or other standard practices. Any thoughts on this? I use R6, RF100-500 alot (sometimes RF 70-200L2.8 from hides). Kind regards, Petri

[@petrisonkeri9604]

Oh dear, right after posting i did find your Editing Bird Photos video.. Anyway, if you have any additional thoughts, videos or suggestions for some good presets, i would be happy to hear... Cheers, Petri

[@Duade]

Thanks Petri, that video is getting a little old now and I do need to do an updated video which I hope to do shortly. Cheers, Duade

[@Feniche17]

Your heron close encounter take off shot reminded me of my first “portfolio worthy” wildlife pic (Gr. Blue Heron). Even had to extend the frame like you did for the composition I wanted in the direction of the take off. Only diff was it was at 105mm on a kyak; and I couldn’t believe how close it landed to me at the time, ~10 yards. Thx for the nostalgia 👍👍

[@Duade]

Thanks for sharing, great that it reminded you of what sounds like a great experience. Cheers, Duade

[@brendanhayes5565]

Great video Duade lots of wonderful pictures, must say really liked the last image of the Golden-headed Cisticola, the cameras these days are amazing to how they pick up the eyes when focusing, my Nikon D3 and 600mm f4 af-s would have trouble I think, might need to update and get lighter gear getting old, thanks again love how you share your knowledge to all of us I know it’s helped me a lot, cheers Mate Brendan.

[@Duade]

Thanks Brendan, yes, I was happy with how that one turned out, Cheers, Duade

[@jordansitorus]

Excellent video Duade! Just came back from a trip to record the once declared extinct in Sabah (Malaysian Borneo) by the authority- the Bornean Peacock Pheasant. We found the pheasant and took some 'record' shots. I was using EF 300mm F2.8 IS II with 2X tele (F5.6). My mates were using EF 70-200mm F2.8 IS II with 1.4X tele (F4) & Sony FE200-600mm F5.6-6.3 G (F5.6-6.3). It was in a jungle (forest reserve) & very dark. Overall, after comparing our photos- under right lighting & minus the sought for bokeh, primes & zooms' produced comparable IQ( warning- bokeh is a lucky bonus when trying to get record shots in our jungle. It's dense!). I wish Canon could produce an affordable 200-600mm lens like Sony did. Lucky for me there was available porter-for-hire from a nearby village. A 3KM uphill trekking in a rainforest with a backpack full of camera gear isn't backbone-friendly lol. Anyway, great comparison Duade, makes me pray harder for the gods in canon.

[@Duade]

Sounds like a great outing and well done finding the Pheasant. Interesting re the comparisons in the gear. Feel free to send me a photo of the Pheasant to [e-mail] Cheers, Duade

[@jordansitorus]

@@Duade Sent a private youtube video instead (By shots I meant video shots, apology for that-it was about to rain & too dark for photos anyway. You can hear the thunder on the background too).Too much publicity will do more harm than good for the pheasants. Thank you for your interest Duade, cheers.

[@RogerFranksSr]

Duade, both are good, habitat and perch. You have really inspired me to do my best when I begin taking pictures in earnest. Right now I will be working with my R6 and the new RF 100-400 as they fit my budget. A possible future purchase will be the RF600 or 800 f11 and the 1.4 extender. I figured I would go for reach since I have the R6 and would not want to crop as much with it being 20 mega pixel.

[@Duade]

Thanks Roger, I think the RF800 on its own would be a nice addition to the RF100-400, it has its issues with MFD, smaller AF zone and slow aperture but the 800mm focal length is a bonus. Cheers, Duade

[@bassplayer60]

You're so awesome. You're not afraid of diving into that mud to get the shot! haha... I don't think I could get up after that one. haha ;)

[@Duade]

I must admit it gets harder the older I get :-) Cheers, Duade

[@yahoonomas]

Your isolated shots of the birds are great, but they do tend to look too similar after a while. The habitat type picture you took of the bird in the grass is not only unique, but beautifully composed and captured.

[@Duade]

Thanks Chris, I appreciate the feedback, Cheers, Duade

[@peterb.7437]

Great comparison. Me too waiting for the r7 to compliment my r6. It will be on my EF600mm II version and my r6 will be on my 100-400mm II zoom lens. Can you make a video comparison between canon RF adapter vs Viltrox adapter?

[@Duade]

G'day Peter, sounds like the perfect combo, U can't wait. Cheers, Duade 👍 oh I haven't tried the other adaptor.