Zuck is crashing out

[@helarki4309]

If your ideology cannot withstand criticism without silencing it, you should rethink your ideology.

[@darugdawg2453]

Not ideology. More like propaganda

[@eeee6937]

What a bad ideology this is

[@SongokuJidai]

The crucible of the overton window at work.

[@thegreatid3595]

Marxism and Communism have never functioned in a society that allowed free speech. simple as that.

[@Blox117]

i agree but asmon cries and bans someone when they call him the same mean words he uses

[@AcaraDain]

I’ve seen women saying things far worse about men. Seems like selective outrage.

[@Yannick9797]

It's a one way street

[@cidsapient7154]

As a white person, I have been called much worse. As a Trump supporter, I have been told I shouldn't exist.

[@pippilangstrump4230]

I rather would say the hate against white people predominantly

[@joshanonline]

@@Yannick9797 100%. I left FB in 2018 because I kept getting censored for being unable to even reply what 'certain people' said, not even copy-pasted. (same is happening here in youtube as well) The last straw was a girl literally insulting a guy in a comment section for agreeing with my take. So I told her: "you don't know he's any of those things any more that I know you are either, so don't say 'that.'" Banned! I appealed, but the moderator said "you are banned for 24 hours only if you delete your comment." Meanwhile, her comment remained. So I deleted my account. A few hours later, I received an email saying "there was an error and my account is no longer restricted" LOL! I was like: "Nope! Delete it anyway."

[@ThatArtismo]

I’ve been saying this for years- fourth wave feminism is disguised misandry. I said this to a content creator on TikTok and got my comment removed. Failed appeals due to moderator bias. It’s everywhere, luckily not Meta soon and X now

[@radiofreedom947]

Every platform enables hate speech, they just decide who's allowed to hate and who's not.

[@PiousMoltar]

Facts

[@zxyatiywariii8]

Good point

[@Total_Entropy36]

tiny hat wearers.... still can't say nothing bout them

[@thecrackin-u8p]

Bingggo

[@thecrackin-u8p]

​@@Total_Entropy36 the juez

[@JodyBruchon]

*I don't trust corporations to decide what speech I'm allowed to hear.*

[@antman7673]

In Metas case, it seems like it was the government anyways.

[@swag8485]

dramatic shift = allowing jokes that were common 10 years ago

[@AS-fu1kd]

I miss when you could make jokes without someone crying about it.

[@ArielCleirigh]

Leftus government and woke weirdos afraid of words.

[@Alnero80]

🎯💯

[@jaydub7386]

Right?

[@andeno10]

yeah, it's a tough crowd out there. People are so uptight these days and are seething for a chance to be morally superior

[@cedricol]

Not banning bad things said about women is equality. You ban no sexism, or all sexism. They chose none.

[@florenbaron7111]

Exactly, words against men has been allowed for decades.

[@GrievousReborn]

It's the same thing you ban no racism or you ban all racism. You ban no religious intolerance or you ban all religious intolerance.

[@doob62]

@@GrievousRebornLike the book policy in texas or somewhere down south. School director or something removed the bible because there were new policies banning sexual content with threats of jail for those who don’t follow it. Guy removed the bible and kept nonsexual excerpts from it to also follow the requirement of teaching about the bible in classes. The republican went wild and said he wasn’t talking about the bible when he pushed for that policy, he was targeting the “woke” material involving exploration of sexuality.

[@trajectoryunown]

@@doob62 Gotta be careful with how legislation is phrased. 😆

[@badrasbury8171]

Banning most any speech will always end up wrong because any -ist or -phobe or opposing opinions is subjective at its boundaries and sooner or later power will be run by the "wrong" people, extremists.

[@fellowninja]

The thing is, the people of these “marginalized groups” will say all this shit about other people all the time. God forbid you throw it back at them.

[@stevechavez83]

They should censor the term "Marginalized Group"

[@PotentialLegend]

All sides do it and all sides have always done it.

[@JoeBlow-fp5ng]

That was the worst part about the old Twitter, pre Musk. Vile posters from "protected classes of people" would routinely post things like "F all white men" or "F America". But if anyone responded with "Then F you too" or "If you don't like it here then leave", that response would get deleted and that account banned immediately for "harassment".

[@stinkfinga4918]

​@PotentialLegend well that's the thing, its natural. Whether it's racism or sexism or whatever, once you protect even one group everything is thrown off balance and shit gets stupid. Now we're trying to figure out who and who not to protect based on who's got it worse, and then those people turn around and dish it out worse than they ever had it. So, shits pretty stupid right now. We gotta let people act naturally.

[@Hadgerz]

crybullies will always be offended and feel persecuted by equal treatment

[@aremihCehT]

>>Why can you be negative against Israel? >>zuckerberg You're being facetious aren't you

[@dukered4560]

They're like children, want to call you names but if you call them one back they want you off the playground.

[@Doubledonky]

@@dukered4560 this

[@A_Goat]

"Rules for thee but not for me" 😂

[@SystematicMechanic]

It's ok if they do it but if you do it it's not okay.

[@UnknownUser-nz3io]

Adult level maturity in terms of logical reasoning and emotional awareness is shockingly low these days

[@Cri354]

maybe thats why they think a 40 year old dating a 20 y old woman is considered being a pdfile.

[@TonberryQueen]

The block button exists for a reason. If someone says something you don't like, use it. And if it seriously bothers you, go touch some grass. You'll be fine.

[@TealWolf26]

Just disconnect. Simple as.

[@harnessriscallous7466]

Asmon truly believes women are inferior and need the state and corporations to ban and censor harmful language though.

[@1425osint]

they can't cuz they're fundamentally removed from reality, if they weren't they wouldn't sperg so hard about someone insulting them that they have to try to remove free speech lol, it's the same thing cults do when you go against their narrative

[@MrVvulf]

It seems entire generations never learned the children's saying which thickens skin - "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me."

[@frosty848]

There argument is the Block button is pointless because they already said it. ya thats how mentaly weak these people are.

[@Behrnahrd]

Yes, and saying "men are terrible" or "obsolete" or worse is also ok. Which has been allowed forever. Also, some household objects are much more useful than certain women. I take offense.

[@KellyfromMemphisDD214]

😂

[@postmodernmining]

Some? Most.

[@ChevBling]

😂😂😂 i agree

[@sentimentalcheung]

Most of them are more useful tbh.

[@emikochan13]

i never understood calling people animals being an insult, animals are lovely.

[@kdark54]

Saying a corporation is on your side is delusional.

[@TheAsureDark]

Growing up black in the early 2000s has hardened me to such an extent that I forget that the rest of the world is soft as fucking butter when it come to racial slurs LOL bro I GREW UP IN CALL OF DUTY LOBBIES "Farm equipment" is feather weight shit LOL

[@Pikawarps]

Tough times bring about strong men, and we all know how rough CoD lobbies were in the Golden Era lol

[@leesutton4612]

I've never heard the slur "farm equipment." That's hilarious

[@elck3]

“Growing up in the early 2000s” hahah

[@JohnDoe-lx3dt]

@@Pikawarpsthey were amazing, just a space to vent daily rage.

[@JohnDoe-ef3wo]

I'm completely desensitized thanks to the early internet..

[@Aireck174]

If a woman called me an ATM machine, I would just laugh. Why do you care if someone calls you a "Household Object".

[@flashdancer42]

Indeed. It's so disgusting that they can say anything they want to men and be EmPOwErEd with it while doing a joke is offensive...

[@ExploderMaster18]

Because truth hurts them the best

[@TheTuttle99]

IKR and since when does someone who says something you disagree with decide what you should disagree with

[@mfallen2023]

Men have a sense of humor. Women don't (largely)

[@prickly_procyonids]

I think the household object joke is hilarious. I think most other women would actually think it’s funny unless you go to a uni or Twitter.

[@Caydiem]

Oh no! "Marginalized groups" aren't a protected class anymore and have to deal with shittalking like anyone else on the internet! The tragedy!

[@dbsti3006]

Well, Reddit still exists.

[@Arvak777]

Sounds like equality to me

[@isaiahlangfords5574]

tbf if woman not dishwasher then why it wash dishes

[@lmAIone]

I read this is a peasant voice, great comment buddy 😂

[@danni222]

except the chosen ones 😅

[@jdr91]

That last remark about "Muh white supremacy" being equivalent to "Muh Jewish supremacy" was probably the most black pilled shit ive heard in a while. Bravo Asmond👏🏽

[@davidpaulos2943]

bro zuck never looked more human...he finally got that new texture pack for his hair...massive upgrade

[@zxyatiywariii8]

Much more realistic skin texture too

[@caduhidalgo4996]

Ray tracing also finally got in this new update I guess 😂

[@мк_Пять.СорокПять]

Ngl the 50cent cosplay with the baggy shirt & chain was kinda funny

[@Cbd_7ohm]

Lol injecting testosterone and using minoxidil among other things.

[@peger]

reptilian upgrade to UE5 xD

[@uu555mm]

Freedom of speech is a beautiful thing 😢

[@rebelmango2141]

Hate isn't tho

[@mrman2415]

​@@rebelmango2141 The word is "hatred," and a few spicy Internet comments aren't worse than censorship.

[@Ishtar_Sothice]

God Bless

[@InMaTeofDeath]

@@rebelmango2141 Hate speech IS free speech as much as many wish it wasn't so. The problem is there is no such thing as a trusted authority on what does and doesn't qualify as hate.

[@justaquietpeacfuldance]

@ hate isn't speech. "hate speech" is just a speech that YOU hate.

[@4zehorde]

It's not hate speech, it's speech they hate

[@Zenocius]

Anti-woke speech

[@duhbaws2705]

Facts.

[@NK_J619]

Feel free to use it and enjoy dealing with the consequences.

[@Racko.]

@@NK_J619 what? violence?

[@TibiConstantine]

You mean the Earth is not flat? That's hate speech, get outta here

[@Wertzuio]

"to learn who rules over you, find out who you are not allowed to criticize"

[@sonicthehedgehog1606]

Free speech is free speech. Simple as that. Who cares if you're offended.

[@darugdawg2453]

Lets go

[@BouncyKnight720]

Ok bot

[@jarls5890]

Look up the limitations on 1st amendment - then try to break each of those - and see how far your "free speech" goes.

[@rielaxault]

@@BouncyKnight720 ok bot

[@reegyreegz]

Being offended is a choice

[@Ben79k]

Glad things are finally normalizing. What a breath of fresh air.

[@Axolotl_questions]

Dont make me tap the sign

[@jfkonlsd1364]

@@Axolotl_questions please tap the sign cause I got no idea what you're talking about honestly

[@Alnero80]

🎯💯

[@Axolotl_questions]

@@jfkonlsd1364 basically the establishment is pumping the breaks on left wing leaning rhetoric and policy for a time and leaning into conservative beliefs until they can regroup and try pushing it again

[@JL-wf2wp]

@@Axolotl_questions yep, glad to see someone else can see thru the smoke they sell

[@raypol1]

"Oh no, people can finally say what they think and shatter my tiny imaginary world"

[@Total_Entropy36]

still can't say anything about juice tho 😅

[@BasedAussie79]

​@@Total_Entropy36every single time 😂

[@colwellalec]

Or, god forbid, say the actual truth as opposed to affirming delusion.

[@1_underthesun]

If your ideology can't hold up to even the mildest of scrutiny, you have a bad ideology. These people need to take a page from the scientific method.... ideas should attempt to be falsified, and if it can't or you don't want it to be, there's a reason why.

[@Caydiem]

@@Total_Entropy36 People are still free to notice though and it's getting really easy to notice.

[@DavidSteeleJr]

People should be held responsible for what they say. Companies that allow people to express their thoughts should not be held responsible.

[@ernimuja6991]

The people cutting body parts and grafting new ones are not mentally ill?

[@jwr2904]

I just commented something similar and my comment got nuked immediately lol

[@mandowarrior123]

If they're not, why do they threaten to game over themselves?

[@mauriceanderson5413]

They are absolutely

[@Barten0071]

We can rebuilt him, we have technology

[@sambarrett867]

💯

[@OhNoTwisted]

You might want to look at what they felt was OK to say about men for the past few years. Much worse than the things they are railing against.

[@TexanAstarte]

Yup

[@T9x610]

We know bro. We know..

[@orishina8169]

I was not okay about the shit feminist told about us. Doesn't mean I'm okay about men telling shit about women aside from valid criticism either. Maybe that's just my culture (french) and we're more rigid toward free speech that the US. But at the same time, I feel like the ethnic/gender wars in the US are partly because of identity politics, which are straight up legalized hate speech.

[@JohnDoe-ef3wo]

@@orishina8169 thats an awful take my friend

[@_theknighthawk_7018]

dam right....I get not all of them felt that...but the fact some did say it. Well, why can't some of us have our views? Freedom of speech/expression (From the UK) should mean you can say ANYTHING...not only what some people WANT you to say.

[@xthexpunisherx]

Oh no people can tell jokes again? The horror. How did women get so fragile that this is freaking them out, it's pathetic

[@shoulderpyro]

the funniest part is, its also guys (well, not sure if we can call 'male activists' still guys. They dont have balls anymore) getting offended over it. why should i get offended over some random idiot online calling me a household object? Technically speaking to this random person, I might as well be - I only live in his pc after all. (x

[@DiogenesDworkinson]

What do you mean "when"? Since always.

[@sarahmcdonald9624]

We aren’t. Some women are, not the cool ones.

[@darugdawg2453]

India pissed fb wont censor anymore like they did before

[@gta6traileroutbutwaitto2025...]

Don’t generalize it, it’s the same with everything. It’s only the crybaby’s not every person in that group.

[@graye2799]

21:30 they say that if you want to find out who rules you, find out who you can't criticize. Critsizing the amount of power israel, jews, and aipac has isnt wrong.

[@raitonodefeat6503]

If a chief of fire fighters can victim blame us for them not being able to carry out their civil duties, I should be able to criticize his mentally insane take

[@erikhyndman1115]

America is healing. This a dose of much need antibiotics to fight the woke infection.

[@georgekirby3361]

That was a woman 😂

[@danieln6700]

So obvious zuck sees the pendulum swinging and doesn't want to get hit by it

[@ponocni1]

I still wonder if he is in some way also victim, being given "cooperation he cant refuse" type of deal. I mean he was quite young when facebook came to be and i would not be surprised if goverment went after him early on. He also did not have as much power back then as Elon to just tell goverment to shove it and at the time he did, he was too deep.

[@t.s.d.1376]

😂

[@The-Dirty-Straw]

He makes it so damn obvious, it seems more disingenuous more than what anyone is doing

[@bobdole776thegreat]

@@The-Dirty-Straw I hear a lot of it too is cause he wants to get into trumps favor so the US gov will allow Meta to buy TikTok to not ban them.

[@푸른-m10z]

Its too late. Ill never forget.

[@Caveman787]

To be fair what have women or feminist men not been allowed to call men? Exactly literally anything they want including things that have legal considerations like grapeist.

[@thisguybrett]

Well said

[@TheSilverPhoenix100]

Good, kind, helpful...I don't think they are allowed to call us these things going by the current Feminism ideology.

[@Caveman787]

@@TheSilverPhoenix100 Ask yourself this simple ? whens the last time you as a man got a compliment from someone in general let alone on their side of things. They try to block men positive content including anti self deletion groups and events....

[@OPTIMUMELITE]

🍇 Grapeist? GRAPES????

[@Lit_Frosty_RL]

Their body, MY choice

[@leroy3784]

Bring the "thumbs down button" back to its former glory

[@Avetho]

Did you know there are 621 dislikes on this video, compared to 27,466 likes? Methinks there are 621 snowflake lefties who hate watched.

[@leroy3784]

@Avetho I did not. Sounds about right

[@cpob2013]

They don't have a problem with misinformation when they allow black cleopatra

[@davidadiwego4608]

there's much worse examples of, establishment-approved, misinformation than that

[@andy381Sw]

You know the saying?

[@taylorsnider5809]

lol black little mermaid is awesome bro

[@bsx132]

You can thank Shlomo for pushing that.

[@Crablover132]

You must be a child if you can’t see why revisionist history is bad

[@mr.anonymous123]

So it went from one side being censored to no sides being censored........ sounds fair to me.

[@JustapErson]

Yep, exact same with twitter. Went from a vitriolic delusional echo chamber to... well, still vitriolic, but at least not a delusional echo chamber. Both sides are now allowed to speak freely. Guess they really don't like equality and fairness huh.

[@dudlecore7358]

no you missed that one arround 22:00 you still cant joke about jews and stuff so they pretend freedom of speech unless its anti semitism which is kinda weird again

[@LiLOD7]

Both sides want to make laws against freedom. We all lose.

[@420jahlion]

what side is being censored and how???

[@nicholasboruta9936]

The right has been admittedly censored by the current admin.​@@420jahlion

[@matthewf1979]

This is what you get when you suppress people for a decade that would otherwise never say these things.

[@aSSGoblin1488]

finally, the dishwasher can stop talking

[@justaquietpeacfuldance]

yep, I really never had a problem with anyone in real life but if you can't take a joke online, I'm gonna try my best for you to hear it.

[@jostnaleman3738]

this is so dumb lmao

[@marioritter7014]

Ah yes, "you made me do it". Rule #17 in the abusers handbook. I'm sure that will convince them this time around!!! Again, just calling out the hypocrites in the comments.

[@vangaptor]

People were never suppressed unless they were semi-intelligent. You could always say something mean to someone without getting banned.

[@ZackyTheSnacky]

Excluding obvious hate comments, truth claims aren't hateful.

[@tomragnarok6538]

free speech is not an "over-correction"

[@stzaleft7355]

Let's put it to the test. I'm going to report your comment for being offensive.

[@QueLoKevin]

@@stzaleft7355i reported it and it immediately disappeared for me. Is it still there for you?

[@stzaleft7355]

@QueLoKevin ahh shite. My bad homie. Yeah it's gone. Aight you right. Fk youtube auto reporting system. That's why alot of my comments get deleted.

[@stzaleft7355]

@@QueLoKevin I'm gonna report my own comment that makes me look like a doucheee. Then it never happened.

[@QueLoKevin]

@@stzaleft7355 we have the power to rewrite history

[@PatRiot-]

Asmond, the reason DEI exists is because the biggest lenders in the world are forcing companies to do it. If your DEI score is low, it makes borrowing money cost more. That’s the only reason. The only reason companies are doubling back is because they are losing more than they have to gain by promoting it.

[@Roguefoxx]

Always follow the money.

[@Tiasung]

@PatRiot That is not the only reason. They also use that DEI to insert their own into critical roles like HR and other ''moderator'' roles. This is very noticable with places like Reddit, the Facebook mods, these days even steam etc. On top of that its even worse: remember the metoo movement? The diddy and epsteins? They use that to blackmail influential people into furthering these agendas.

[@Beezkneez187]

Yup. Thats why when "they" get into office government agencies go full DEI. Gotta do what the boss says. Ron Paul should have won not Obama

[@thomash3218]

And your savings in funds are used by these companies to force dei if they want investments. Strive funds are non esg btw

[@PollyO_YT44]

Well said!!

[@rs.matr1x]

"If I had a kid, I would get them all of the vaccinations" Well yeah Asmon, your kid would need them to survive in your domain.

[@sjent]

Survival of the fittest. A natural way of things. Those that make it, will have unbreakable immune system.

[@genshinsage]

Domain Expansion: Asmongold House

[@jacobsmith8377]

😂

[@8ettieP46e]

lol frfr no cap

[@UltraProchy]

bro the kid would be the most immune person on the planet growing up in that post apocalyptic environment, definitely wouldnt need some weak vax

[@ElderSign32]

overmoderation made the entire internet gay and boring. hopefully every site follows the trend of twitter and meta

[@FOF275]

I love how they're framing it as if Meta is telling people to say this stuff. They're so disingenuous Just because a platform allows free speech doesn't mean it supports or encourages the worst of it, it just lets people say what they want

[@mandowarrior123]

Forbes is encouraging it, I've never heard the farming equipment one. Some of my best friends are farming equipment xD

[@angeloflores2614]

They want that narrative especialy legacy media

[@iccc998]

​@@mandowarrior123 Its h-o-e. 😅. They are afraid to say it. So they said farming equipment

[@williamjenkins4913]

@@iccc998 Oh I thought we were just straight up calling blacks "farming equipment"

[@P.T.S.E.]

It's not disingenuity, but disinformation. If Meta were to tell people what to say, encourage or support topics, they would be acting like a publisher and loose their protection against lawsuits and could be held accountable whatever were to be posted on their site. What they are doing right now is getting rid of anything that could be used to accuse them of being a publisher - them using editorial power through censorship, recommendations or information flow control. It's not in protection of free speech, but covering their arses.

[@GurtGobain]

Don't sympathize with someone who would choose a bear over you

[@yzwme586]

mf fax

[@PP-hk5yi]

I don't 🤘

[@JohnBurgundy66]

It’s all performative. 99% of social media posts are disingenuous. Dopey women love any attention they can get and if simps stopped giving it to them, we could all move past this quicker.

[@trippinhard250]

That is all ragebait

[@erxanerxan9769]

​@@trippinhard250 i mean its ragebait , but when you apply that to men , somehow it turns out it really is an issue for women , and not really bait

[@mostpolitebot1464]

calling men wallets or "your bag" is the norm but household object is worse than tha holoca-

[@Lam-ba-Lam]

Literally overheard my girlfriend refer to me as 'her wallet' while waiting for me the other day Even if it was a joke I've felt weird about it ever since

[@flynnoflenniken7402]

@@Lam-ba-Lam I wouldn't break up with her over that (unless it's part of a pattern of behavior), but personally I'd sit her down at some point to have a serious talk and question her about it. If it was just an offhanded joke she didn't think much about, it's not a big deal, but I'd want to be sure. That's just me though. Only you know the full context of your relationship, and only you know the best way to handle it.

[@Prebondus]

I agree ​@@flynnoflenniken7402

[@drankydrank1]

@@Lam-ba-Lam Talk to her about it. That's weird af...

[@hushlore]

@@Lam-ba-Lam communication bro. talk to her abt it

[@Frerducayou]

Letting some AI make their own AI is one of the most dumb and dangerous thing I've ever heard, probably more dangerous than nuclear bombs, literally this guy is a menace to humanity

[@freespeechenjoyer]

Literally seething at the idea of free speech. Axios, a company that calls itself a journalistic publication.

[@rebelmango2141]

Where's the contradiction? Define free speech

[@molerm9442]

“Did you just express an opinion?” “Did you just make a satirical joke.” “Did you just disagree with me? that’s vile.” People forget words really mean nothing. If you call a whale a fish does it matter, even tho it’s incorrect?

[@jonsnow3176]

@@rebelmango2141 Because being a journalist hinges on free speech

[@kenbobcorn]

I think you misunderstand what journalism is. Axios just reports on the facts, and its a fact that advocacy groups are criticizing the changes. And these advocacy groups have every right to make their opinions heard, just like you want to express your opinions. So i don't think you understand a) what journalism is and b) what free speech actually means. Free speech also covers your right to criticize free speech restrictions. That's called public discourse and it is a good thing.

[@griffinarcher2911]

​@@rebelmango2141 Being able to say whatever you want, so long as it does not physically harm someone. It's a contradiction because journalism is supposed to uphold the freedom of speech (as both are outlined in the first amendment); "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. A journalism publication saying it disagrees with freedom of speech being upheld is essentially saying that they don't want the freedom of press to be upheld either.

[@Just_a_turtle_chad]

Making jokes shouldn't be censored, freedom of speech should be controversial.

[@Roger-fs5yo]

TurtleChad has a mental problem🤣

[@bubbles8871]

*shouldn't be controversial

[@deusexmaximum8930]

You mean shouldn't

[@johnconcentrius]

@@bubbles8871 No no no, free speech will ALWAYS be controversial. people are allowed to disagree under freedom of speech

[@Doubledonky]

If you get offended by things you read comments and such you should be barred from the internet.. this applies to children if your kid gets so upset remember the internet is not a safe space whatever checks are put in place… parental oversight or barring is the answer because you ARE just a bad parent! worldwide censorship makes things worse do your job

[@VioletElite4]

I feel like it's a lot of men who are just tired of women hating them for no reason so they're clapping back lol

[@TexanAstarte]

Exactly

[@x7Votorious84x]

I plan on getting women to report me to hr and loving every second of it. One time a old women told me I'm not very organized when it was my first time doing a certain job and I called her a B and when she reported it nothing happened. She was probably only 45 btw. The point is she offered no help just criticism, she wasn't there to train me in the first place. It was a fast paced job too.

[@SpyrosAdventures]

It's both sides, that's incel behavior

[@Vandel96]

@@x7Votorious84x youtube doesnt have freedom of speech, so i cant call you what you are. Sad times

[@RDV333]

I hope Facebook comments just become Instagram comments.

[@L-8]

Controversial opinions are still free speech, regardless of whether they are supposedly OR objectively offensive.

[@994pt4]

as a white man I see people attack me all the time with their hatred and racism but I don't agree with censorship...that is NOT the answer

[@pianospawn1]

When someone is saying malicious things, it gives you more information about them than any damage they do to you.

[@994pt4]

@@effjesse_ oh, i'm brave af! 🤙

[@mfwiloseintouhoubossfights9305]

They call women marginalized group then they say they are equal to men Make up your mind...

[@sick911]

And they can't define what a woman is.

[@shrektheogre4118]

They only want the label when it has something to offer them back

[@tomasburian6550]

They did make their mind up, they are push whatever suits them at the time.

[@LordParticle]

It's the paradigm of Schrodinger's Feminism. A woman is simultaneously both empowered and oppressed and just chooses whichever one benefits her the most.

[@DrakeOola]

Strong independent victims

[@iihellionii9742]

Calling Trans mentally ill pisses them off since they don’t like being called what they are as it is. Man says “I’m a woman and I’m not mentally il!”. Ok bud

[@newworld456]

Facts. If you don't like hearing it get off the internet

[@kaecake9575]

I blame our feelings.

[@Bryan_Giovany]

bruh

[@zfsbsdxky-om8ez]

Just for reference, do you do the akuma pose after you tell them that? Do you add "Die 1000 deaths"? lol. Well that last bit would probably break still break TOS because someone would take it as a literal threat but hey I'm all for the 2009 internet where some toxic gamer dude and a trans activist get into a 20 page flame war on facebook.

[@ლუკაფოფხაძე-ღ1ზ]

True, they are not normal

[@Montana_horseman]

Just keep in mind that this whole time it's been perfectly fine for the televised news media or anyone to call Trump the "past leader of Germany" and perfectly fine to call his voters "snazzis" They never labeled that as hate speech. Honestly .. that is every bit as bad if not worse than anything they allow now on facebook. It's only a terrible thing/problem when others are allowed to call them names but not vise versa.

[@rainbowsnek]

ironically, weren't those same snazzy people infamous for their propaganda, censorship + burning of books and such? maybe we should just call it projection at this point

[@JeremyDeere]

It's not hate speech... It wouldn't even qualify as slander legally. We live in a day and age where throwing rocks from a glass house is socially acceptable. The news moves so fast the public can't even stay mad long because their attention is diverted to the next scandal almost daily. It gives a whole new meaning to the term "throw away society".

[@lewis123417]

​@@JeremyDeerecalling someone a nazi can be libel if it's not true and causes reputational damage

[@Montana_horseman]

@@JeremyDeere I agree it's not hate speech, my point really was, they've called every mean thing they hear against them, hate speech. They've also claimed words are violence. The Germany leader/snazzi thing is an actual call to and green light to violence against Trump and any who voted for him. Trump almost paid with his life because of that kind of rhetoric. Their just freaking out because Zuck took away one of their weapons and now they'll have to play on a more level field for once and they are going to lose even harder now.

[@Avetho]

@@lewis123417 The left engages in constant slander, libel and defamation.

[@michaelbrown1236]

Hate speech isn’t real. Feelings do not constitute what speech is.

[@tremblence]

Just can't criticize the one religious group that has power over the rest And starts with a J

[@Clarence_the_potato]

@@tremblence Jahovas Witnesses?

[@ArthurMorgan123-r6y]

​@@Clarence_the_potato JAY OH OH

[@Andrewgaming-jm8mn]

WTF you talking about? Hate speech is really real and feelings 100% constitute what speech is. To disagree is just pure ignorant. The pen is stronger than the sword and speech had cause far more destruction than any other form of communication. How do you think Hitler got his power and got the country of Germany to do what he want? Also if anything can bring slavery back to the USA, what do you think it will be? Its gonna be a good speech from someone one level above Trump.

[@Wismic]

unbelievably ignorant and lacking in any critical thought. what a stupid position to be in.

[@XcutAngel]

I got banned for writing "dork" in response to a Kamala Harris post, and got banned. Never bothered going back. edit: to be clear, this was in 2020, not during the recent election. I've been long gone.

[@homi7760]

I said way worse but they blocked me.

[@DRichards705]

Lucky I got bored of Facebook before wokeness got that bad. I think I could still log in now, I just see no reason to do so.

[@jimboh.2654]

Hahahaa sounds like you're the dork 😂😂😂

[@PurposeIsEverything]

They don't like facts

[@Carl_Brutananadilewski]

@@jimboh.2654😭😂 🤡

[@arthy27]

what is MZ background demo or rep?

[@ChickenPermissionOG]

No such thing as hate speech, it is just speech they don't like.

[@YUTAB-ck9rp]

If saying “men are ATMs” is allowed, then saying “women are household objects” should be allowed too. Personally I would never say either, but it just needs to be fair.

[@jmwmusic]

Even if someone said either of those things, who cares, there’s more important things than worrying about someone you probably wouldn’t want to be around anyway. Getting offended over it is just a feeling, it will pass, learn to control your emotions, it makes you smarter

[@lewis123417]

​@@jmwmusicpeople taking an interest in the free speech rights of others is a completely normal thing, especially for people who have principled politics. Ignoring what's happening in your own society is less emotionally mature

[@jmwmusic]

@@lewis123417 that’s true. People are just born like that. I was born just to not care about this stuff so am spreading my bias around it ig.

[@dethTr0ll165]

I think they finally woke up and realized that identity politics don't mean crap to normal folks.

[@ZeonEons]

@@dethTr0ll165 No this is to do with the administration in power. Mark has no choice unless he wants to see his company take a nose dive

[@radicalxg8282]

Nope its just he's falling in line with the current administration views just like he did by adding the woke rule with the previous admin, he has no ideology nor loyalty for any entity just his company. If dems wins next election he will revert back everything

[@maerto]

Lmao you're naive to think of that. Billionares follow money, not morals.

[@thecrackin-u8p]

​@@ZeonEonsyup if dems come back especially as a majority everywhere they will go right back

[@Fadaar]

You can't be serious. Nothing has changed at all, follow the political tides and more importantly follow the money. Zuck isn't stupid, he knows to not draw the ire of the incoming administration.

[@Avetho]

"I WaS oFfEnDeD! I wAs OfFeNdEd AnD i HaVe RiGhTs!" "Well, so what? Be offended! Nothing happens! You're an adult! Grow up! Deal with it!" "I wAs OfFeNdEd-" "I DON'T CARE." Best comedian lines ever. Steve Hughes tells it like it is. _Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will _*_never_*_ hurt me_ was taught to preschoolers for a reason.

[@bitharne]

“They’re a private company. They can do whatever they want…” No they can’t. Stop it. They have 230 protections…that is, by definition, not a private company but a public platform. They are, by definition of government concessions, a public square and are not allowed to editorialize AT ALL.

[@pinguwingu7690]

Can’t something both be a public platform and a private company. I mean Twitter is the ultimate example of this. Yes they can do whatever they want on their platform. If Zuck wanted only conservative ideas or liberal ideas on his platform he can do that. It’s an open market, the idea is that if people don’t like the censorship then a new platform would appear that allows for more freedom of expression that people will turn to. If you want to compare it to a public square than it can be a public square. It’s just that this square is in private property owned by Zuck and he can kick out anyone he wants if he wanted to.

[@colwellalec]

Yep exactly why I always hate when people make that argument, especially when it is in favor of censorship. Like if you wanna have that standard, fine, but then they should lose those protections that make it so they also can't be prosecuted for content on the platform. Don't get to have it both ways, but of course since it has been in favor of the incumbent party they have allowed it.

[@darkfoxxbunyip]

It was hilarious to see all the leftoids on Twitter repeat that mantrum ad nauseum before Musk bought the place and then had tgat same bullshit repeated at them when Musk fired 80% of employees and allowed people to come back who were previously banned. Best load of money wasted by someone other than me on nonsense.

[@Typexviiib]

@@pinguwingu7690youre just not going to acknowledge section 230 protections and requirements?

[@pinguwingu7690]

@@Typexviiib “Section 230 allows for web operators, large and small, to moderate user speech and content as they see fit. This reinforces the First Amendment’s protections for publishers to decide what content they will distribute. Different approaches to moderating users’ speech allows users to find the places online that they like, and avoid places they don’t.”

[@billmelater6470]

Why shouldn't such a thing be allowed? You can't fight "offensive" language without inherently enforcing personal bias. Offense can only be taken, not given.

[@Itamar536.]

I mean... that's true to a certain extent, sometimes (and in certain platforms most times) you can clearly detect inherent malice from someone regardless of your own interpretation of what happened

[@zeked4200]

​@@Itamar536. Wouldn't you "detecting inherent malice" be considered your interpretation of what happened? It might be correct and it might be the majority opinion, but at the end of the day isn't it just that? An opinion based on an interpretation?

[@pgtmr2713]

Your rights end at the next person.

[@billmelater6470]

@@pgtmr2713 Not necessarily. Depends on what you mean by that.

[@Scott6794]

The clear answer is zero censorship of people's opinions. Anything else is a tyrannical tool, and it will be used as such by whoever wields it. When will people learn?

[@dbsti3006]

I still say Reddit is worse with censoring. Almost as bad as youtube. Comments like mine here get deleted regulary. Daily.

[@PhucYuBich]

Reddit is absolutely the worst. The mods are too strict. The bots are too strict. You can't really express yourself without being moderated. Bro you can't even post if you dont have enough 'karma'. It's wierd.

[@dbsti3006]

@PhucYuBich dude, anytime I look for an answer to something via Google search, it puts Reddit on top now always. Hopefully Reddit is suffering and paying Google to put them up there. Good, because now more people see how dysfunctional reddit is.

[@dbsti3006]

@PhucYuBich All you have to do is say something that sounds remotely conservative, and you're gone. Someone needs to really convince me that reddit isn't a Communist stronghold.

[@MajorJefferson]

Depends on what sub you on... I once said the second ammendment won't help you versus the whole US military if shit goes south, it's outdated and dumb to think you can fight the gouvernment. The ammendment is for self defense, hunting and sport.... Boy the Americans hated my guts so bad

[@PhucYuBich]

@dbsti3006 the only time I go in reddit is for a quick answer. Most of the time, if the question is 'answered,' the mods will turn off all further posts on that sub! It's like bro, the same answer can have many different perspectives! A majority of the time, the people who want to help answer the question will give some background on how they came to that conclusion!

[@hollowthere3850]

Ask them how the hell speech "causes harm" when you can just not pay attention to it or block it. Words only hurt childish people that can't handle anything.

[@RedDragon-yp3tg]

Protected categories shouldn’t be a thing.

[@JoeOvercoat]

They had a place in their time, but they are way past their time.

[@Trucking4Jesus]

well on fb, they aint no more LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

[@michellewilliams9772]

@@JoeOvercoat They had a place in their time, but they are way past their prime. So it's up to us to mime the sign, that they get outta the line. Bye bye not on our dime!

[@jokalee]

Children👀

[@RedDragon-yp3tg]

@@jokalee use common sense. I think you know what I’m talking about.

[@bryanobrien2726]

Even youtube comments are way too over censored . You can't get a reply in half the time because you've unknowingly used some keyword that ay-eye flags falsely . There's no way to even know what you said wrong , let alone try to appeal . It all makes people go somewhere else .

[@3D_TUTS]

yeah, it's extremely annoying We can only use 'positive' words ;D

[@spencerstevens2175]

They won't even tell you what comment got you suspended, just that you broke some nebulous tos. How am I supposed to know what I even said that broke the rules?

[@Troopertroll]

Took me 5 tries to get my comment posted here

[@doob62]

@@Troopertroll I only have trouble posting on this channel when I mention things that aren’t pro-republican.

[@streamylc]

​@spencerstevens2175 o thought the same thing when they told me my comments i made were going to hidden if I "continued with my behavior"

[@Hyskya]

remember that one AI made by meta that became really edgy? my theory is that it's slowly happening to the AI that controls Zuck

[@sznikers]

Mark "Tay" Zuckerberg 😅

[@shadowman1988]

Some countries have a ban on anti-Jewish, Holocaust denying and Nazi propaganda, since Meta has services that serve the whole of the planet (more or less) I imagine it's much easier to ban this outright rather than individually limit what one country can see.

[@marekwiater2454]

Freedom of speech on Facebook before GTA VI ????????

[@robertshank3729]

Stolen comment: "Plot twist: We are in GTA VI... We both are sentient AI programs within it"

[@zoanth4]

Still can't criticize israel or the juice, not a free speech platform

[@osric190]

@@robertshank3729 GTA VI is that good, we're already in it. Oh shit

[@momofighter3211]

GTA VI: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

[@robertshank3729]

@@osric190 so good that every other GTA, I guess every other video game for that matter, are mini games inside it 😂🤣😂

[@Litepaw]

"iTs a pRivaTe cOmpaNy tHey cAn do wHat tHey wAnt'

[@headlesschicken111]

Its a public coy

[@timboslice5314]

They loved screaming that at us when we got banned for talking back lmao

[@echomjp]

The siren call of losers everywhere. Just act like it's okay when a billion-dollar corporation does something wrong, just because they aren't the government and/or are on your side. We should be holding companies accountable for violations of our rights, and especially when they have so much power in society this is more important than ever.

[@katy9291]

Jeez, yea.. I remember when they were screaming that, I guess they forgot about that now huh?

[@harpiessnow]

@@headlesschicken111 Really? Cause when 3rd Wave Feminism was in swing during the early to mid 2010s and Facebook (along with other companies like Twitter and YT) swept all negative comments directed towards females, and left negative comments directed towards males alone, the Feminists and other Leftist Liberals were constantly hollering "ItS a PrIvAtE cOmPaNy, ThEy CaN dO wHaT eVeR tHeY wAnT!"

[@Nqd-r6r]

How is calling a trans person mentally ill hate speech? That’s just stating a fact

[@Raincat961]

How about do something better with your life than getting so mad about. 0.001% of the population lol

[@cyfangz9238]

@@Raincat961 y u mad?

[@lordcavendish2478]

​@@Raincat961 you saying that is proving his point

[@billbradley4878]

@@Raincat961 You cant push it in every public school in the nation and then pretend it is a tiny issue. It is in the cirriculum in the public school system, everyone is therefore talking about it. Leave other peoples kids alone and then we can pretend it is a tiny issue.

[@quintinnunn1392]

Fact

[@boombox2112]

Zuckerberg looks like screech from saved by the bell 😂

[@DutchDread]

Mark Zuckerberg suddenly sounding more human while talking about how AI is improving......

[@petrkinkal1509]

I for one welcome our AI overlords and appreciate them becoming more human like.

[@DangLin-Wang-m8b]

Mild censorship is still censorship. These clowns will never allow you all to simply have your freedom.

[@polymloth]

As a woman, I’d be insulted if someone genuinely thought I was just a household object. But at the same time, it’s their freedom to say so and my responsibility to deal with my emotions.

[@X1in]

yeah but how much it's important that opinion to you...that's the way everyone should think

[@SeptemberManHey]

@@X1in another point which is great about men insulting each other online is it prevents us from staying/becoming what the insult was. is something hurts, idk either grow a backbone or mb do better

[@Nanohamage]

based, nobody important to you is going to call you that anyway and other people simply don't matter. On the other hand i can't live without my washing machine so it's not even that bad all things considered

[@rushpatriot2866]

You're correct blender that's how the world works

[@trevordwyer5638]

@@X1in Not sure what you are trying to articulate but you lost me at "the way everyone should think" anyways.

[@VAMPZDJ]

Back in my day, people didn't let words crush them.

[@sandorclegane3658]

How come we're still not allowed to talk about or criticize the "chosen" ones?

[@CT-zg2mh]

Sorry, free speech does not allow you to say that.

[@sandorclegane3658]

@CT-zg2mh and why is that hmm?

[@PiousMoltar]

Who? What?

[@MisterPerson-fk1tx]

Yah you can, pay attention.

[@alex434343]

Too much money and influence, too much cultural paranoia about people rallying to crush that tiny minoorityy.

[@game.master69]

WE ARE TIRED OF THE LOUD MINORITY SILENCING THE MAJORITY

[@NunyaBiznezz-q2v]

Appeals to the majority shouldn't even matter. We're American and we can speak freely, it's our constitutional right whether your opinion is shared by many or very few. This crap that has been going on is anti-American and unconstitutional.

[@NunyaBiznezz-q2v]

Appeals to the majority shouldn't even matter. We're American and we can speak freely, it's our constitutional right whether your opinion is shared by many or very few. This crap that has been going on is anti-American and unconstitutional.

[@alexeymaksakov9047]

And they still do

[@jeffmofo5013]

Actually, if You watch the full rogan interview, that is exactly what happened. He's been surrounded by women his whole life. And was never shown the man side of things. 3 sisters and 3 daughters and the tech world with it's women first nonsense. He said he started doing MMA and there it was. Something he's been missing his whole live. He says he's been living a neutered life living around all these women. You can choose to say that maybe it's a lie, but that's what he said. But he definitely doesn't have a back bone, which he said and why he brought on Dana White, to have someone that will push back.

[@thecrackin-u8p]

Still a snake..if dems gain control again, guess what will Happen?

[@OhHenGee1796]

Really? When was this interview? I agree, though, men need to be around MEN. Women cannot raise men.

[@UnknownUser-nz3io]

Obama put him on a leash in 2008. It was big news when he was called into the WH for a secretive meeting under the guise of doing his patriotic duty in the war on terrorism.

[@martinethomassen7111]

Use to make me worry for my 4 boys when they lost their father, doesn't have to be a problem, my boys are becoming real men, just having the right influences around them and being an independent woman that fixes shit on my own... only thing they don't learn from me is hunting and that's what great uncles are for (adhd and hunting was hard).

[@anarky3585]

That episode was really good ngl

[@Mr._Dingo]

Does anyone know what was cut around the 20 minute mark?

[@jbnOracle]

Calling a Trans people weird is not actually WEIRD

[@PhucYuBich]

Being forced to accept their reality and going against your own moral values is WEIRD.

[@TibiConstantine]

Werid, weid (with Zegler inflexion)

[@UnCreativeDeconstructionism]

​@@TibiConstantinethe only time I like that reference. lol

[@uberrandomperson]

Yeah calling something that is weird, weird. Is in fact normal! Who would have ever thought. I am flabbergasted..

[@MATCHLESS789]

Obsessing over other people's lives is definitely weird.

[@GokuSolosAnime]

The world is healing

[@banedon8087]

Possibly. We'll see.

[@randydisher1153]

beat me to it

[@dogtags2010]

Allowed to say it on Facebook, doesn't mean you can't still be charged for a hate crime if someone reports it. Freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences of the law.

[@Justchillin145]

@@dogtags2010hate speech is legal in the US genius

[@mfallen2023]

@@dogtags2010 Maybe if you live in some backwater like the UK where tweets = police visits, but in the US? Nah

[@kyledouglascox]

"Meta now allows claims of 2+2=4" .....REEEEE!!!

[@Doubledonky]

Reeeee reeeee !! the salt Mine is glorious even if zuck is a pluck

[@batteredskullsummit9854]

Never think anyone psychopathic enough to become a billionaire is your friend. Their castles are built from bones

[@DonaldDeCicco]

When people say things I don't care for on social media, I exercise my freedom to turn it off and do something else.

[@KekBruh]

This is the way

[@michaeldority9282]

The point is that, you should be able to say anything period, u can choose to get off or choose to respond, now if u aren't allowed to respond we got a problem see the issue yet?

[@thecrackin-u8p]

I forget it after 2 minutes 😂....

[@alemswazzu]

Das rayciss 😂

[@Ephem13]

The upside about free speech is that you get to say what you want. The downside of free speech is that everyone else gets to say what they want. Equality is simple, everyone is protected, or no one is protected. Having protections for some and not others is never equal.

[@baryony]

Yeah. Also you can always block people if they make you feel uncomfortable. It's not the end of the world.

[@TastyScotch]

Woman: “what do you bring to the table?” Man: “a good job and stuff. What do you bring to the table?” Woman: “I am the table.” Man on meta now: “You are a household object.”

[@shadowflash705]

The weather vane has turned to where the money is. A few years later you can imagine him posing as an airplane and pulling Immelmann turn if situation will change.

[@nottyseel949]

I gotta say, none of the LGBT+ persons I know are anything like these parades. The parades give me vibes of what an opponent would do to characterize them as being strange and potentially mentally ill. I don't understand why the parades aren't just a bunch of super normal looking people walking down the street so people would be like: "What's that?" "LGBT parade" "Oh, it's just looks like a bunch of people walking." "Exactly" Instead of being like: "Oh no! Why'd they tar and feather that guy?!" "They didn't... He's just gay." "😮"

[@noblekitten336]

They don't want to be normal or equal

[@SonOfLum]

"Not my lgbt"

[@everyoneroasted]

@@noblekitten336 "They"?? you're only speaking of a loud minoity, most gay dudes are normal sitting in their couch playing video games or watching movies

[@Sniegel]

Accusing someone of being mentally ill isn´t inherently an insult. It just may be a genuine assessment and done out of care for the individual being accused. "Dude, wake up, you´re not well, seek help!" Labeling things like this as "hate speech" is narrow minded. Just because someone gets emotionally hurt by a comment someone else made doesn´t automatically mean that hate was directed at them. And who decides if something is hate or done in good faith and if it´s ok or not? Should you get more protection from hate (or percieved hate) if you assign yourself with a certain label? All this gets very complicated if we don´t respect the principle of free speech. Otherwise we´ll ban speech based on the subjective opinions of those in power.

[@pvshka]

It's, in fact, not an accusation at all. To accuse means to imply someone did something wrong. You don't have to do anything wrong to be mentally ill, it's just something that can happen, through no fault of your own.

[@Sniegel]

@@pvshka I agree, I could have used a better word for it.

[@DDracee]

probably a language error here but you can't "accuse" someone of mental illness, that doesn't make lexical sense given the definition of these words

[@Scott6794]

It's an assertion, not an accusation. I agree with your point, though.

[@pinguwingu7690]

Yeah totally agree, but most people on the internet are going to use it as an insult.

[@kaecake9575]

"Its called The American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it." -George Carlin

[@FlippableFlappy]

Its a dream because its not real, just like the first amendment, the second amendment, the rivets on boeing planes… etc.

[@RBGHfam]

Any subsidized social media platform should be subjected to hateful speech because they are protected by the billion/trillion? dollar 230 public subsidy. The platforms should have tools built into them that allow the individual users to mute other users in a thread or completely. Government should not be involved, unless actual laws are broken. If the platforms want to fore go the 230 protection, they can become publishers and publish what they want with the caveat of being sued for defamation or liable.

[@justaquietpeacefuldance]

I went back to the 90's some time ago, I'm glad social media is catching up.

[@zxyatiywariii8]

Same, I loved the 90s.

[@malcolmliang]

"Marginalized groups" is just coded words for the new bourgeoises

[@Scott6794]

I'm surprised I didn't notice this. The grotesque bourgeoisie.

[@dmhendricks]

Nope, there is no such thing as "hate speech." There is only speech that you hate.

[@Vaycanseee]

That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Yes there is a thing called hate speech, but it's our right to be able to hate someone through speech.

[@JohnDoe-ef3wo]

thank you.... i completely agree👍👍👍👍

[@justaquietpeacfuldance]

@@Vaycanseee give me an example. Only speech that should be moderated is calls for violence and death threats. Everything else is exactly this - a speech that SOMEONE hates.

[@CT-zg2mh]

@@Vaycanseee You sure about that? The people who demand free speech are the most terrified by it because they for some reason have no comprehension that others can use words. This is why it is so heavily policed. Say something bad about a Jew or other religions and you find out just how far peoples precious free speech goes. Free speech is the embodiment of "free for me, not for thee".

[@EriaAri]

​@@WaffleExplosion99 I know you're probably a bot, but I feel this needs to be clarified for any people who see this thread: No, your opinion or feelings on something don't change what it is. Just because you "believe" what you say doesn't change whether it is or isn't hate speech, in the same way that you disagreeing with something doesn't change whether it is or isn't hate speech. One would hope that people who talk so much about seeing wrongs done to them wouldn't turn around and do the exact same hypocrisy, but much like your father, I remain disappointed.

[@kestutisrasimavicius2467]

There cannot be free speech with the corporate ownership of social media platform with financial incentive. Only decentralized social media can be an environment for natural and spontaenous interactions.

[@joesuchy1157]

Really no

[@resudeew2636]

So everyone can be talked to like straight white men have always been allowed to be talked to now? Crazy.

[@Scott6794]

Wiemar America is closer by the day

[@FlippableFlappy]

@@Scott6794been here. ♍️utts are living in 🤡 world

[@Dave-lh6ws]

Oh noooo... people are allowed to say mean things, how ever will society survive? Serious how absolutely pathetic and coddled can someone be? I remember when if someone said something mean or messed up you just ignored it. This is what happens when shelter people

[@zxyatiywariii8]

People have become ridiculously soft.

[@ZeonEons]

@@Dave-lh6ws While I agree no one has ever ignored it, especially online. In the real world obviously this wouldn't work to interact with someone who's clearly abusing their freedom to speech to such hateful degrees. It's most definitely best to ignore them if possible

[@frosty848]

Blame the parents for raising soft children. I thank my dad for raising me to face the harsh reailty of the world.

[@ZeonEons]

@@frosty848 Actually blame anyone that ignores a child's cry for help.

[@mrfoodarama]

If its not illegal, why shouldnt you be allowed to say it

[@Scott6794]

I agree. If you want to insult someone, you should be able to. If you want to say something that isn't true, you should be able to. If that person wants to sue you, they should be able to. Anyone who thinks free speech is not a good thing is either low iq or malicious.

[@jesseward3121]

"A friend of a friend told me that they saw Mrfoodarama in a 6 way man train in the public bathroom of a Starbucks." it's not illegal to say that, because it likely won't affect you in a way that would be classified as defamation...but you should be able to have that removed.

[@mrfoodarama]

@jesseward3121 I'm ok with it, Free Speech is important enough to me that I would fight for their right to say that. I think one of the most important things we have to understand is we have to stand up for everyone's rights, even when we don't agree with what's said. That's a great thing to point out

[@SEATACx]

“Gate to Hate” sounds like a DOOM track.

[@miguelmedina1991]

Freedom of speech is letting somebody say what you don't like

[@actualBIAS]

Like thinking that you, miguelmedina, are an incel and will never have a girlfriend? I love freedom of speech.

[@rebelmango2141]

That's not what it means

[@Maverrick2140]

there wouldn't be a need for "free speech" otherwise ^^

[@MoonDeeG]

Self destructive and lonely NPC behavior.

[@northboundtjr]

exactly - the gov't & corp.'s have no business controlling what people can say. Leave it up to the court of public opinion to decide where the light shines. "Being offended is an occupational hazard of living in society". People have always said awful things - but it's not for the government to police - when people say dumb things you just ignore them & don't give them a platform... People who say these things are already thinking them.... who cares if they say it lol just turn your phone off.