RTX 4090 | GTA 5 at 4K, 8K, 16K - Ultra, Very High & Low settings

[@Jmeshok]

20K is not possible because of directX limitation, maximum render resolution in dx11 is 16K, and it can't go any further

[@zWORMzGaming]

Ohhh! I see! I'll pin you mate, thanks for the info!

[@alexnather7614]

What about dx12 or vulkan

[@Jmeshok]

@@alexnather7614 In DX12 limit is also 16K, and in Vulkan documentation said that 4K is recommended, but it can go beyond that limit

[@aminebelhachemi2004]

It's about the engine not the DX bruh

[@whoisjoyboy]

@@aminebelhachemi2004 🤦‍♂️

[@lorenzoperrone760]

The weird feeling of 4k being the lowest resolution tested...

[@LordLentils]

The GPU costs a fortune, bro. It's a no-brainer.

[@urkent4463]

yeah. that's also MY part but my omen x27 manifested itself also as a part of this thoughts aaand laugh's about 144hz with it's plug and play with it's 240Hz with possible oc for 270hz and at best, real 0.7 ms on max overdrive in wqhd

[@BITCOIlN]

I dunno why they even test this card on FHD and 1440p, for this type of cards even 8K makes more sense than testing it in 1080p.

[@Darkswordz]

1440p is for the commoners. 😁

[@blancpainbritt]

Lol

[@luddebama]

It's also crazy to think that 16k is 16 times the pixel count of 4k

[@zWORMzGaming]

Indeed! Crazy stuff!

[@m_r-ock6508]

Isn't it 16x 1080p?

[@luddebama]

@@m_r-ock6508 2160p aka 4k has a total pixelcount of 3840 x 2160 = 8 294 400 pixels. Meanwhile 16k has a total pixelcount of 15360 x 8640 = 132 710 400 pixels. And 132 710 400 divided by 8 294 400 is 16.

[@m_r-ock6508]

@@luddebama oh ok I see

[@Ajaz-]

@@luddebama genius 🤯

[@selohcin]

My jaw dropped when I saw you running the game in 16K in real time. I had to double-check the math. *THAT'S 128 MEGAPIXELS PER FRAME.*

[@zWORMzGaming]

Absolute insanity!

[@gurjindersingh3843]

Our phone camera don't have as many Megapixels.

[@ezioboiz-ieatchildren-]

@@gurjindersingh3843 phone mega pixel and a computer screen mega pixels aren't same

[@gurjindersingh3843]

@@ezioboiz-ieatchildren- I know

[@michaelangst6078]

pointless unless you're playing on like at least a 150 inch screen

[@Ichangedmynamein]

honestly crazy how the 4090 runs some games in 8k 60 fps+

[@abidhasan2974]

Yup. Nobody cares

[@RazDum.]

Not surprised

[@immanji8380]

insane price 🎉

[@Shishio]

@@abidhasan2974 who?

[@eddiew.4650]

Kinda worthless atm. Most people don't even own 8K monitors right now. 4K isn't even the universal standard yet.

[@Intel-i7-9700k]

4k@144hz is the ultimate dream, and it seems that the RTX4090 can pull it off. Would be a fairly good upgrade to 1440p@144hz.

[@casmithh]

No we would need to wait another gen for a flawless 4K 144hz

[@luukherfst1209]

@@casmithh Almost all games run at 4k 144hz now with the 4090, like even red dead redemption 2. A super demanding title runs at 4k 120 fps ultra settings. No dlss ofcourse, cause that doesn't count.

[@casmithh]

you can't run rdr2 4k 120 ultra with a 4090, the average would be like 90 fps. and rdr2 isn't even the most demanding, talk about like plague tale requiem or cyberpunk 2077

[@whitegirlsoncrack]

You wont see difference between 120fps and 144 lmao

[@AlphaXY13]

I didn't even get into PC stuff until a few years back but man I remember when GPUs being able to hit a constant 60+ in 1440p was a huge deal. Now we're reaching cards being able to do 8K 60 FPS and it's wild to see.

[@Z3t487]

The game, PC version, is 7 years old though...

[@xMaFiaKinGz]

Honestly we should not push beyond 4k textures. There is alot more potential in 4k textures. 8k/16k textures are a waste. Same thing with anything higher then 60/120FPS.

[@LordLentils]

Yeah, that's called technological advancements lmao.

[@davidfeddanigga54]

@@xMaFiaKinGz Hell nah wtf

[@DDD-xx4mg]

@@xMaFiaKinGz 60fps what are you talking about thats like minimum playable 😂 I’m going to keep upgrading until we see least 8k Ultra wide 240hz in AAA titles

[@atharvaparihar951]

GTA 5 is not just a game, it becomes a unit of measuring pc performance for every gamer literally.

[@arceuscream875]

every new gpu and cpu as well

[@lifeisanutshell2422]

it's not anymore this GPU can run 8k 60+ fps on this game but on newer games like cyberpunk it can't even get 4k 60+ on relatively high settings i'm not gonna include starfield :)

[@Suckgamerr]

actually gta5 is a low end pc game now i got i5 gen 10 with only UHD(lowest gpu) and still can run gta 5

[@ruzoke]

@@lifeisanutshell2422 cyberpunk is the most badly optimized game of all time

[@BuenasTetas18]

GTA 5 is quite well optimized that's why it works so good ,more demanding games like Cyberpunk should be tested

[@hariskhan01]

8K 60 is so Phenomenal! However, I would personally enjoy playing at 4K120, but its great to see it nonetheless😁.

[@Robert-uy7oj]

@@neihc1589 yeah, no cpu bottleneck at that resolution, if the cpu can get it 188 fps in 4k it can in 8k as well, sometimes there are other limitations where the gpu doesn't need full 450w and is bottlenecked by other gpu stuff, like memory and memory speed, bandwith

[@Robert-uy7oj]

You know, my comment might be a very bad and unclear explanation, but the best way for you to learn how bottlenecks work, put a 4090 in a slow pc, see how it works at all resolutions, then tell me how the 4090 is already at it's peak in this video from zwormsz

[@Kw4Mc]

bro there is no bottleneck in 4k xD if you want to see bottleneck you test it in 720p or 1080p low lol ryzen 1600 2600 3600 and 5600 have same fps at 4k because in high resolution it's the gpu that limits lol you'll see gpu being bottleneck in 4k in at least 3 generations of gpus if you get 20-30 more fps it's because you play in 1080p, and i don't know if you're a professional and use your gpu accordingly but if not buying a 4090 to play in 1080p is the dumbest thing ever but now since you have a 4090 i assume that you at least have a 4k monitor but you won't see fps difference between your 5900x and 7600x due to cpu, probably the main difference you see is because of ddr5 but still then it depends on what you got if you got some shit 4800Mhz c40 vs that 500$ kit of 6400 c32 c32... anyway have a good day mate

[@Robert-uy7oj]

@@Kw4Mc thank you for saying it the way i intended🤝

[@Kw4Mc]

@@Robert-uy7oj i tried my English Is not very good 😅

[@wanhl2440]

8k gaming is finally made possible by RTX4090 GPU. It was 5years since where we saw people did dual 1080ti in SLI to attempt 8k gaming on the first time. And the result was not promising like 30-40ish fps on low. 4090 is insanely powerful beast

[@ddbcjekdkcjeksocjrkfkfje]

Yeah but it's not available for average gamers due to its price☠️

[@wingless747]

3090 can run at 8k 60fps on medium to high settings fine, 4090 isn’t the only card that can do 8k.

[@devendarkumar7085]

​@@ddbcjekdkcjeksocjrkfkfje brother 8k is not definitely your average gamer it highly intensive if you want to play high you will have to spend high

[@OnFight1997]

You've been having fun with this one. I can't blame you though, must be a great feeling playing all these titles at 4K-8K with incredibly impressive results.

[@mafin_official]

But why would you want 8k when you have a 4k monitor? The video won't change (except for the 4 × lower FPS)

[@ezioboiz-ieatchildren-]

@@mafin_official sharpness

[@plompudu2529]

@@mafin_official down-sampling 8k to 4k is sharper then native 4k since it doesn't have to guess as much which color what pixel should have. But tbh if you dont have a 55"+ monitor at 1m distance it is really not worth

[@abhirupkundu2778]

@@mafin_official sounds like someone who doesn't know anything related to technology

[@mafin_official]

@@abhirupkundu2778 Well that's why i was asking

[@anonymous0691]

Bro it's been 2 years since i watched this. Time really flies.

[@IDDosII]

Best benchmarker in youtube so glad of you buddy 😇💪

[@zWORMzGaming]

Thank you mate! Abraço 😃💪

[@IDDosII]

@@zWORMzGaming Abraço

[@HNisCrazyOfficial]

2:04 First man who is waiting for stutters 😮😮

[@spandanchakraborty189]

everyone tests upto 8k ultra but my man took tested this gpu in 16k...keep up the good work man.

[@gurjindersingh3843]

I am disappointed he didn't test Minecraft in 16K.

[@klaus6081]

Em 2017 o Linus tech juntou quatro NVIDIA Quadro P5000 e só conseguiu rodar games a 2-4 fps em 16k. 5 anos depois, games jogavéis em 16k se tornou algo possível com uma única placa, isto é o futuro senhores

[@PedrosvaldoMiloPenha34]

Absurda essa 4090

[@klaus6081]

@@PedrosvaldoMiloPenha34 E olha que nem é a versão ti, a ti deve criar vida e fazer o trabalho do precessador só de zoas

[@etmezh9073]

hello I speak english i don't know what you guys are saying ok bye 10 month later edit: ok im stupid thank you for telling me

[@PedrosvaldoMiloPenha34]

@@etmezh9073 we don't have the obligation to speak english, the world doesn't revolve around you

[@Bruno_Laion]

@@PedrosvaldoMiloPenha34 corte afiado tem nome, Tramontina

[@Finger112]

I think for 16k to become a realistic possibility, were going to need GPUs well above 24GBs of VRAM most like, upwards into the 30-50 GB range to be even remotely possible.

[@prafullrahangdale666]

Anything below 512GB vram will be bottleneck

[@jonathanoxlade4252]

More than that gonna need 128gb ram gpus then then 256gb and so on

[@TheWarrior9921]

These 4090 benchmarks makes me to think that my videocard completely suck :D

[@zWORMzGaming]

It only sucks if it's a G100 👀

[@lolbruh5621]

And the GT 710 😂. Makes the Intel Iris Xe Graphics look like a beast

[@diegobarreto21]

Impressionant! 16K using 20GB VRAM and the temperature is around 60 degrees in the GPU and in the CPU!

[@user-wq9mw2xz3j]

I think this is a game that deserves modded testing. There's plenty of good free graphics mods, like NVE and just a reshade + enb.

[@joaor5602]

People still can't understand the madness that is a graphics card deliver more than 1 FPS at 16k resolution (15360x8640p) A few years ago we had difficulties playing at 30 FPS in 1080p resolution... For you to understand, to run a game at 16k it's like your video card is delivering 64 monitors at 1080p or 16 monitors 4k. This is insane! In 2017 Linus tried to run some games in 16k using 16 4k monitors and 4 nvidia Quadro P5000 cards! At the time each of them cost $2499.00. 5 years later only 1 GPU can deliver more! What will we have in the next 5 years??

[@lordadz1615]

Crazy how intensive msaa still is. But i think its visually much more appealing then TAA which just smudges the image

[@zWORMzGaming]

Yeah for sure :)

[@prateekpanwar646]

At 4K, 4X msaa is similar to 16K resolution. 4 samples per pixel.

[@Wasmachineman]

AA in GTA V is a absolute fucking joke though, even with 4x MSAA in 1600p chome parts of cars like my Fagaloa or TT5/Rstein's grille look like shit.

[@lordadz1615]

@@Wasmachineman hmm idk. It looks fine for me tho. I use 4x looks pretty nice. Maybe in that specific instance it's not that well implemented

[@megakarlachofficial]

@@Wasmachineman MSAA only affects anything but transparency, so it's still remains look like shit.

[@danishbashir4184]

You finally did it man and you delivered. I am interested in VR headsets and was thinking how many years it will take for a graphics card to power a 16K VR headset (that I think is enough resolution for crystal clear image quality resembling reality). This means that 5090 will be the card that makes VR mainstream. We already have a 12k VR headset from Pimax (I have 4k one and still image quality looks like a 480p video). So 2 more years and we have a real VR experience. I now have my answer and Will buy the headset and card after 2 years. Thank you so much man. Great job.

[@CalmusStoicusHQ]

16k seeing it first time on a game by a gamer or KZbinr or a graphics card, mighty impressive stuff , 👌👌

[@ezioboiz-ieatchildren-]

Eh not the first time

[@dierksbird]

I remember when watching a movie with 4k was a brand new thing

[@cyclonous6240]

I'm not buying any GPU anytime soon in at least 2 years and still I enjoy watching his videos whenever they come! Nice work and commentry Kryzzp!!

[@etmezh9073]

i just want good integrated graphics lol (im stuck with hd 4000)

[@gurjindersingh3843]

@@etmezh9073 5600G has best iGPU (I think).

[@gurjindersingh3843]

Which GPU you have?

[@etmezh9073]

@@gurjindersingh3843 no try intel core i5-1135g7

[@Birdman._.]

@@gurjindersingh3843 iris xe is kind of better if its a i7

[@SkoolConnor]

It's so surprising to see a GPU able to run a game at 16k even though we dont even have 8k monitors yet! I wonder where we will be in terms of technology and resolution in the next 10 years.

[@michubern1444]

there are 8k monitor

[@blase1856]

Just imagine, what the 4090 TI will be like. I really didn't expect the 4090 to be THIS much faster than the 3090 TI. This is absolutely insane.

[@lelandwilt1565]

I'm excited for the 4050 and 4060, if the jump between the 4090 and 3090 is the same for 3050 and 3060 the 4050 and 4060 will be insanely strong for their price points.

[@ItzEm666]

@@lelandwilt1565 not actually

[@firexallst4rz277]

Not that much of a boost

[@donutbedum9837]

4090ti is rumored to have around 18300 CUDA cores compared to this one’s 16384 so it’s not much of an increase when you think about the fact that the 3090ti had 10000 CUDA cores. That’s not including the raytracing and other cores that are included (I don’t know what other cores are included besides CUDA and RT) maybe tensor or something

[@1gta4gta]

10 more fps 😂😂

[@AllouhaX]

11:40 BRO, you're playing in 8K 💀💀

[@alphachad69]

Me watching in 1080p: 👁️ 👃 👁️

[@GoExPlore777G]

I'm just waiting for the rtx 6090 only for the pronunciation. "Guys, this is the new Rtx sixty-ninety" 😂

[@tobbe5189]

its so impressive how the card stayed at under 60 degrees

[@ThePastaManCan]

Yeah cause that isnt the hotspot temp or ram temp, they're at most 15c hotter, my 4090 says 58 at max but on flir its warmer.

[@tobbe5189]

@@ThePastaManCan still super low lol for a card of that power

[@AdamsBrew78]

I love this game… probably the first thing I’ll play when my new 13900/4090 PC arrives today.

[@Behdad47]

Crazy how in 3 years we got from running games at 4K30fps to 80K60fps. 6000 series is gonna be even more mindblowing.

[@maaax1173]

Well not really, in a game where a 3090 gives you 4K 30fps, a 4090 would give you 4K 50-60fps or 8K 25-30fps. But yeah, I'm really excited for RDNA3 too, I hope the price will be somewhat similar to RDNA2 and not like 1000 bucks for a 7800xt

[@Behdad47]

@@maaax1173 I agree. Many of us will opt for an AMD card since Nvidia's taken it way too far with their pricing. Besides, not many of us need that much horsepower in our systems.

[@QuackZack]

nearly 16K30fps, mind boggling.

[@B.t.u.95]

18:39 nice fps drop

[@Marko101_96]

Its must gonna be a good video when you start with 4K Ultra 😀

[@chickennugget7339]

You should benchmark Quantum Break. That game can be intensive at higher resolutions, maxed settings and the upscaling disabled. Keep killing it with the content, you're the best benchmarker on KZbin!

[@Benji_7210]

Bro has more fps in 16k than me in 480p 😭

[@KiaMatrix]

The 4090 card is so cracked it’s crazy. Two years later in Sept. 2024 it’s still the best graphics card on the market. 4k resolution at 190 FPS is just fu*king nuts. 😂

[@woahbuddy9113]

24gb!! That bar hardly moves in games, rtx 4090 is crazy

[@zspargen]

The way he played 16k its like i play in gta but in low graphs and 800x600 lmao

[@NBWDOUGHBOY]

Imagine if you could SLI 4090s and it actually scaled. 16k would be achievable Damn!

[@zentar2646]

nope

[@NBWDOUGHBOY]

@@zentar2646 yep

[@Mailootje]

@@NBWDOUGHBOY Nope

[@NBWDOUGHBOY]

@@Mailootje yep

[@jordanlazarus7345]

I wish SLI worked better than it did, seems like such a baller solution to use two power supplies and run multiple of the most powerful GPU's available but we all know how that ended :(

[@adammapper174]

Legends say computer will explode after uploading

[@lgpa565]

At this rate in 5 years we might be able to play 32k lol the monitor would need to be like an entire wall

[@barbellvgo2424]

*Cinema

[@emeraldmine549]

humans cant see at 32k they can only see at 16k unless they get an eye enhancment

[@saimumsultan4946]

crisp: oh my god! are you kidding me? me watching it on my 1080p monitor: yes

[@fernandochapa1433]

I play at 16k to avoid CPU bottlenecks 😊

[@Birdman._.]

With a 1080p monitor ?

[@irsshill4502]

Celeron gang

[@רועי-ב3מ]

Monitors have 1440/1080p the st Standards trash Monitor have 720p which is out of date xd

[@רועי-ב3מ]

Standard FHD FHD+ 2k

[@91cb7]

I play on a 1650 because I don’t see the reason in spending that much on a graphics card. 3090 is more reasonable to me

[@MarbyTheJingo]

I’ve been having trouble ejaculating lately and this video has been helping me out greatly. Thanks!

[@Strataklas.]

what monitor do you use? i know its 32 inches but i also hope its 4k, at least 144hz so that you can fully enjoy the gpu! and also is the 4090 yours or did nvdia send you one for a period of time ?

[@zWORMzGaming]

It's a Dell g3223q It's 4K 144hz :) I'll have to send it back soon!

[@n9s3nse10]

@@zWORMzGaming just buy it back:)

[@Techsnowball]

@@n9s3nse10 or steal it

[@inter3988]

@@zWORMzGaming so will there not be future 4090 videos?

[@Strataklas.]

@@zWORMzGaming ok thank you for letting me know!

[@PETERGREENDAY100]

Honestly I’m not so interested about a GPU that I’ll probably never be able to afford, I’m here only because You’re so fun and entertaining, I wish you did gameplays and walkthroughs man. Soo nice 😁🫶🏻 16k is insane, I can’t imagine how the game actually looks irl, can’t really tell from a KZbin video

[@battyflaps5410]

Also its mad how when your at 8k the whole thing even at low settings just looks so clean compared to 4k and lower.. like shadows and small details etc

[@aaronkendallf.linaban9070]

Wow awesome, thats just crazy compare to my pc that could barely run gta v literally under 20fps on lowest settings no shadow, at 600p res, stuttery experience, could barely load textures… yet somehow i manage to play the game halfway of the main story before killing it

[@Matt08719801]

Ty so much for testing 4k completly maxed out was hopeing 8 years later it could be possible but now will wait for next gen

[@RazorCallahanDK]

Do GTA IV please, we all know that it's badly optimised and we want to know can it finally holds 60fps without dips

[@StaticVapour590]

damn I remember the GTA V being the benchmark game for every system. Few years old AMD FX CPU and R9 270 / GTX 970 / something...

[@winesk123]

U cant rly tell the dif between 4k and 1080p by watching it, but 16k.. Damn, this shit goes hard even thru my 1080p after youtube bitrate degradation 🥶💀

[@TheReelReesePod]

We’re in the times when 60FPS average is no longer considered good, even at 8K. Crazy.

[@jordanlazarus7345]

It's so weird to think that I used to dream of 60FPS, but now anything less than 100FPS is what I consider to be low

[@gamer2k01]

Jack never fails to disappoint

[@patrick17_6]

😂😂

[@dartheveloper5449]

I really hope that the 6090 will be the best gpu ever made purely cause of the name

[@Sir_Saul]

Last time I played this game was 30fps low settings (PS3) I think it is worth a replay now in stereoscopic Ultra 3D now that I have a 4090

[@ImperialDiecast]

yeah and take your time driving slowly (if you plug in a controller you can treat the trigger like a gas pedal and apply medium pressure) you actually experience the surroundings and people on a whole new level this way rather than just rushing from location to location.

[@akrammesbah5576]

Me in 480p : very beautiful, i love the Graphics

[@TerraWare]

Hey man I have a 4090 question for you. I seem to be experiencing some screen tearing when capping the framerate, whether it be the in game built one or Nvidia COntrol Panel or Riva Tuner Statistics. I was wondering if you've experienced this on yours. I don't know if it's a driver thing or what but it never happened on my 3080Ti or 6800XT

[@ezioboiz-ieatchildren-]

What is your screen refresh rate?

[@ThePastaManCan]

Gotta cap to your monitor refresh rate.

[@TerraWare]

@@ezioboiz-ieatchildren- Sorry missed your reply. Its a C1 oled TV (4K 120hz) it's fine now

[@TerraWare]

@@ThePastaManCan I was but I was still getting screen tearing. Issue seems to be resolved now. It was early day of the 4090 and others with C1 oled TV were having similar issues

[@Introverder]

This game looks fantastic on 16K monitor of mine!

[@chizkodem]

imagine a 5090

[@Azkael777]

I got ya bro :D kzbin.info/www/bejne/hpild4ePmdJjg68

[@jordanlazarus7345]

the RTX 5095 ti PLUS superclocked

[@imsogooder]

Kryzzp: Can it run Gta 5 RTX 4090:Can GTA 5 run me?

[@ceruleasky]

200 fps huh? now go into online mode.

[@ROSHAN-sz5nj]

Your calculation ate me😂

[@0---RABB1T---0]

bro played 16k at a better speed than my old ps4 could do in gta online...

[@AdamantMindset]

this could become a good second hand budget card when we reach 16k gaming ERA xD

[@sidharthadas391]

That days is not far where 8k will an ordinary resolution

[@bhxlegend]

I have never seen a GPU this powerful

[@ababababababan]

16K! Wow! And 1080P still feels pristine to me!

[@existable_yt]

9 years ago: 1080p120 now: 16k30

[@danielsgrunge]

Absolutely bonkers the amount of performance these new GPUs and CPUs are getting

[@NoCapNick698]

Wow it’s crazy to see how technically behind the PS4 is, when you run GTA online at 1080P the frame rate is almost identical as the RTX 4090 at 16K Very High. It’s almost a miracle that they’re still able to pull off games like RE4 Remake

[@vadnegru]

i remember game marketing was so hyped that it supported 4k. Now we see that developer jumped over their heads with 16k support

[@A1Crawler]

gpu uses more power than my entire pc 💀

[@mafin_official]

The reason why jack isn't here is because he's jealous that you have a 4090.

[@jordanlazarus7345]

That was a nice little maths lesson at the end 😂

[@cullinan8087]

the way you say stutter is very cute

[@HuntingKingYT]

"It’s just some pixels in a video game" - zWORMz 2022

[@SsDGodGamer]

And i am watching this video in 480p... nice👍

[@thechildlive2698]

Me at 720p device: Is there a difference?

[@TheLoneWolf449]

I'm more blown away by the power usage, it's impressively low

[@Bruno_Laion]

340w it's a lot much for me My gpu for comparison only draws 100w, but it's like 300% slower than a 3090 tho 😂

[@TheLoneWolf449]

@@Bruno_Laion compared to the 3090 ti it pulls less though. That's the impressive part.

[@Odinsday]

The fact that at 16k, this card gets similar frames to the Xbox 360 and PS3 ports of GTA V, games that ran on consoles from the mid 2000s and at 720p is actually insane. The amount of progress computer gaming has made in the past 16 years is unparalleled.

[@matt-dw]

The 4090 runs this game at 16k about as well as my current system runs the game at 1080p 🤯

[@Serpic]

The game is 10 years old. And this is perhaps one of the few games that runs well in 4k120fps+. This is not the kind of 4k gaming players dreamed of.

[@misteryoww5026]

you should do a pov gameplay with these videos so we could see the beauty, on screen doesn't do it justice

[@robertojustus-canaloficial4457]

Warzone in 8K ultra +100fps 4090 is amazing

[@avengersrollin3237]

GTA V in 20k be like: are you serious, kid🤣🤣😂

[@Qari_Sudais]

Killing Bob everytime 😂

[@WinterWolf7u7]

This is the first time I've heard about 20k, it's just amazing

[@clingy7278]

8k and 120 fps is always a dream

[@extinctwarriorrace1755]

Bruh, I will move on to 2k in several years from now and this man is playing at 16k

[@hobbies-unlimited]

Nice Video again :) Crazy what the 4090 is capable off - I will try to get a 4080 ... that's fine for me :D Looking forward to your next video :)

[@ElNegus9985]

4080 isn't gonna be worth it lol

[@Birdman._.]

@@ElNegus9985 same rumours was for 4090 that it is like 20% faster .-. Just wait ..

[@ikategame]

27 fps in 16k very high, this you call crazy? nothing wow.. another junk gpu that cant even get 30 fps

[@ElNegus9985]

@@ikategame bruh

[@arceuscream875]

@@ikategamebruh are u from the future ? , at least this would be a dream coming true for a 90s gamer

[@xdpplays8002]

ahh long time no see! 360k already! Wow!

[@legionx97]

Imagine this guy's electricity bill 🤣

[@rcadenow7543]

the 16k thing will aged well in 10 years from now:)

[@smaug9833]

When your GPU graduates from MegaHertz to Teraflops.

[@ammanus356]

"Its applying MSAA to every blade of grass" Thats not how MSAA works, its actually drawing 8 frames internally and using a mix of all of them to remove aliasing. Its not applying it to any individual object at all

[@zWORMzGaming]

It's way more intensive in grass tho!

[@ammanus356]

@@zWORMzGaming yeah but relatively speaking it isn't. It's the exact same percentage reduction as youd expect anyway, because it's rendering out 8 of the already super intensive framea

[@PPedroFernandes]

that's not what MSAA does at all. MSAA only multi samples in pixels with geometry edges. A pixel fully covered by a single triangle will be sampled normally, just once. It follows that it's so intensive in grass because the immense number of grass blades obviously have a ton of edges compared to for example the road, and therefore MSAA is applied to a lot more pixels. Saying "it's applying MSAA to every blade of grass" is EXACTLY correct.

[@Jin69Jin]

14:25 him regretting. Sometime later going through people with his car 🤣