How China is Taking Over the Car Industry
24:09
Post-AGI: The Future of YouTube Careers
53:06
The AI Revolution: 2024 Review & Impact
14:36
Пікірлер
@JustCraig-l5g
@JustCraig-l5g Күн бұрын
Amy followers up with a letter of resignation and goes on holiday anyway
@danielkafer
@danielkafer Күн бұрын
Ha ha why would you say that?
@Mrtigershorts873
@Mrtigershorts873 Күн бұрын
Do I need chat GPT plus for these features to work?
@danielkafer
@danielkafer Күн бұрын
Yes you can still use voice mode with the free version of Chat GPT. The plus version offers real-time browsing, and priority speed. You may also experience slower responses during busy hours. If you’re happy with basic conversations, the free version is still useful. However, if you need faster responses, real-time web info, coding help, or file analysis, the PlusOne plan is worth considering.
@JohnSmith-wn1ms
@JohnSmith-wn1ms 2 күн бұрын
How does trade have to be fair to Americans when you don't even allow Chinese cars to be sold in the US?
@danielkafer
@danielkafer Күн бұрын
Aren’t Chinese cars sold in the USA? I just thought they had a tariff on them? But maybe it amounts to the same thing?
@fredfrond6148
@fredfrond6148 2 күн бұрын
The reason for this loss is the overfinancialization of the economic system. In China if Mr. Xi wants to compete in the auto manufacturing. He studies and says I want EVs. The provincial government and big city banks lend money to entrepreneurs and watch every penny. The banks know they will lose money because this is a nascent industry. Then comes a nasty Darwinian hunger games fight. Out of that comes some real predators like byd, xpeng, geeley, xioami, gac… In the USA Biden says I want to compete with the Chinese EVs. He gives billions of USD to General Motors. Mary Bara conducts a stock buyback and the share price goes through the roof. Everybody makes money, the us debt grows and no cars get developed.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 2 күн бұрын
Very interesting analysis
@fredfrond6148
@fredfrond6148 2 күн бұрын
@ finally just like they did with apple the Chinese invite a world class company in to the special economic / free trade zone. Then tell the survivors this is who you will be competing with if you make it out of China have at em. They did it with apple in Shenzhen and Tesla in pudong.
@MrTropxe1-1
@MrTropxe1-1 3 күн бұрын
Thank you
@AprezaRenaldy
@AprezaRenaldy 3 күн бұрын
If legacy OEMs can't compete with Chinese companies in China. While Having the same Cheap workforce and the same subsidies for ev from the Chinese government.And Mature EV infrastructure . Moreover, there are no obstacles in terms of the number of Public chargers (There is no chicken and egg problem) In ev adoption . They legacy OEMs will lose no matter where they go .
@donaldfry8087
@donaldfry8087 4 күн бұрын
Hope for the future
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 4 күн бұрын
Indeed
@netscrooge
@netscrooge 4 күн бұрын
Great interview. Glad I found your channel.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 4 күн бұрын
Welcome aboard! I am really glad you find it interesting 👍
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km 5 күн бұрын
This is my dad. He has his own channel just like me and my brother.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Thanks honey 💖 I appreciate your support 😀
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km 5 күн бұрын
🙊. (). //
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km 5 күн бұрын
Hi, hi hi hi hi dad
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km
@CarolinesWorld-fr9km 5 күн бұрын
Hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi hi dad
@redbeansg
@redbeansg 5 күн бұрын
Now that China is able to produce better and cheaper cars, these creeps are spreading the lie that it is unfair, that China is not playing by the rules. What rules, what is unfair? When the Americans and the West were dominating the car market of the world, did China say it is unfair, not playing by the rules? What China is doing is just being more innovative, creative, competitive, efficient, high tech, to be able to make the best cars at the lowest cost. Is that unfair, is that wrong? Stop being a sore loser. If you cannot compete, inefficient, making poor quality cars and selling at high prices, it is your fault. Why don't the Americans compete fairly, by being better, cheaper and good value for money?
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
You raise an interesting point about competition in the global car industry. China’s rapid advancements in EVs and manufacturing efficiency have reshaped the market, forcing traditional automakers to adapt. However, the debate about ‘playing by the rules’ is often tied to differences in subsidies, trade policies, and market access rather than just innovation alone. What’s considered ‘fair’ in trade is incredibly complex. It’s not just about who builds better or cheaper cars-it involves differences in political systems, labor costs, unions, government support, and regulations that vary widely between countries. The U.S. and other global players now face a choice: rely on protectionism, or step up their game with better technology, efficiency, and pricing. In the end, competition benefits consumers, and it will be fascinating to see how this plays out in the next decade!
@dicky-duck6632
@dicky-duck6632 5 күн бұрын
Europe and the United States are lagging behind, and once they fall behind, they struggle to catch up. For China, electric vehicles are merely a flint for energy transition. China's goal is to increase electricity demand to force itself to transition to new energy sources. The ultimate objective is the large-scale use of AI computing and robots to replace human workers, as this requires an exponential level of energy supply. Think tanks in China are already planning for how the government will impose robot taxes 15 years from now to subsidize factories and companies that employ humans, somewhat similar to the current fiscal policies that incentivize hiring people with disabilities. This is not a science fiction movie; rather, it is part of the next five-year plans that China is formulating.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
You bring up an interesting perspective. China’s EV push does seem to be about more than just cars-it’s part of a broader energy transition strategy. The idea of driving up electricity demand to accelerate innovation in energy production makes sense, especially given the growing need for power in AI and automation. The discussion around robot taxes is also intriguing. If automation replaces large-scale human labor, governments will need new tax structures to balance productivity and social stability. It’ll be interesting to see how other economies, like the U.S. and Europe, respond to these shifts in the coming decade.
@CrzyD-cv8xz
@CrzyD-cv8xz 5 күн бұрын
It's not that the US can't compete but it's just legacy auto makers can't compete because of the old legacy structures. Tesla competes but it's not just a car company is it? It's more like a tech company same with some of the Chinese auto makers. It's not just the robotics and automation you guys talked about. Those are just part of it. The new energy vehicle industry is very tech company like. Just look at NIO, Xiaomi, Huawei (Avatar ). The car is not just a car but just a node in a person's life a part of an ecosystem. Right now legacy auto US, European, and Japanese either don't get it or it's something that they just can't face because to transform your legacy auto company to being more of a tech company is going to take massive reforms and overhaul. By that time it's too late.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Spot on-I completely agree with your assessment. The challenge isn’t that the U.S. can’t compete, but that legacy automakers are struggling to adapt due to their outdated structures. Tesla thrives because it’s not just a car company but a tech-driven ecosystem, and many Chinese automakers are following the same path. The shift to new energy vehicles (NEVs) is as much about software, connectivity, and AI as it is about manufacturing. Companies like NIO, Xiaomi, and Huawei (Avatar) understand that the car is no longer just a mode of transportation-it’s a smart device integrated into a digital lifestyle. Meanwhile, many traditional automakers are still focused on incremental improvements rather than radical transformation, and by the time they adapt, it may be too late. The auto industry isn’t just evolving-it’s being disrupted at a fundamental level.
@CrzyD-cv8xz
@CrzyD-cv8xz 4 күн бұрын
@danielkafer While the West is trying to figure out this legacy transition keep an eye on the new Chinese development. Another sector the Chinese are very good at are drones. Xpeng has given clue of potentially the next phase at the CES show with their drone carrier minivan. If the Chinese govt wanted to they can kickstart this so called low altitude transportation economy in the next few years. Good luck legacy auto if that happens because it's not even limited to automobiles anymore!
@ltribley
@ltribley 5 күн бұрын
There's a lot of projection of US superiority. unwilling to recognize that we, the US are responsible for our uncompetitiveness with China. The US companies made the decision to move to China. China didn't force them to leave the US. We focus on China, but US companies have been sending jobs to MANY countries around the world. Look how Mexico has prospered from US jobs. Vietnam, Thailand, India, you name them.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
I think you’re correct-many U.S. companies chose to move jobs overseas, not just to China but also to Mexico, Vietnam, Thailand, and India. This wasn’t something China forced; it was a strategic business decision driven by lower costs and supply chain advantages. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing. While the U.S. has moved away from labor-intensive manufacturing, it has remained a global leader in high-value industries like technology, finance, AI, and innovation. And despite offshoring, the U.S. continues to outperform much of Europe in GDP growth, which suggests its economic model is working in other ways. The real question isn’t just about where jobs are going, but whether the U.S. is positioning itself in the right industries to stay competitive in the future.
@pjtomtai
@pjtomtai 5 күн бұрын
You only ask for "fair" competition when you can't compete. Hilarious.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Fair competition is often debated when industries face disruption. In reality, it’s not just about competing-it’s about whether companies have the flexibility to adapt. In this case, you’re essentially asking for less interference from unions, so automakers can automate freely and compete on efficiency. The bigger picture is that industries evolve. The real competition isn’t just about who makes the best cars today, but who leads in automation, AI, and the future of mobility. The question is whether U.S. automakers will be given the space to adapt-or if rigid structures will hold them back.
@Truthstelling
@Truthstelling 5 күн бұрын
The guy is unreal. The US has been given so much opportunity in China to make billions. They were also on the same level playing field in China for the EV transition. They however did not invest and innovate like other Chinese companies. Let's remind everyone that during the last few years, a lot of Chinese local car companies have gone bankrupted due to their lack of scale, lack of innovation and lack of investment. China did not bail them out like the US did. If someone has to be blamed, it is the US companies and others. The guys is talking nonsense
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
You make a strong point-U.S. automakers had the same opportunity to compete in China’s EV market but, in many cases, didn’t invest or innovate at the same pace as their Chinese counterparts. While some companies succeeded, many others fell behind due to strategic missteps rather than external barriers. It’s also true that China didn’t shield all its car companies from failure-many local automakers struggled with scale, innovation, and funding, leading to bankruptcies. The U.S., on the other hand, has historically been more willing to bail out key industries, particularly in times of crisis. At the end of the day, competition in the EV space isn’t just about access-it’s about who moves the fastest and makes the smartest investments. And in that race, some U.S. companies have clearly fallen behind.
@tingng9569
@tingng9569 5 күн бұрын
Cream rises to the top .
@namelesswarrior4760
@namelesswarrior4760 5 күн бұрын
If not to dominate the market that you specialised in! Then, what is the point of running a business?
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Profitability is one of the key goals in business, and while market domination can be a strategy, it’s not the only path to success. Many highly successful companies thrive without outright dominating their industries. Take Porsche in the auto industry-it doesn’t sell the most cars, but it’s one of the most profitable car brands in the world. AMD competes with Intel and NVIDIA but remains highly profitable without absolute market control. Even Apple in the PC market has a smaller market share than Windows-based PCs but generates massive profits due to its premium strategy. So while market dominance can be an advantage, a well-run business can still be incredibly profitable without being the biggest player.
@namelesswarrior4760
@namelesswarrior4760 4 күн бұрын
@@danielkafer Porsche used to be a top tier luxury car brand that dominated the high-end market for decades. The same goes for the likes of Rolls Royce, Ferrari, Lamborghini etc. These luxury brands didn't need to sell huge volumes of cars to stay viable is cos each luxury car they sell brings in the same amount of revenue as selling 10 standard cars in some cases from brands like Toyota, Ford, Honda etc. But they know that those golden days are coming to an end due to the EV revolution and will not survive as a business, if they can't keep pace with the rapid changes. EVs is a new industry that these big names are not prepared for and don't have the infrastructure & supply chains to be competitive against China. Arrogance & complacency is why the West is in trouble in so many industries. I can go on. But.....
@s.c8410
@s.c8410 5 күн бұрын
The host and the guest are typical old school Americans denying the fact that the US is been left behind.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Why would you think I am American? I never even lived in the US. I am Danish! My belief is that Europe is falling behind, not such much the US, but competing with China will be challenging in many industries.
@lv9657
@lv9657 5 күн бұрын
When you're unable to compete, you accused your competitors not fair & not play by the rules you set up earlier. What a sore loser.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Steve is not in the legacy car industry and does not have the challenges he is talking about. He is only describing the issues for the legacy car industry.
@PVLTD
@PVLTD 5 күн бұрын
The reason is pretty straightforward. American and European EV makers made their EVs for most rich people that could afford it. Chinese EV makers made their EVs for most people that could afford it. If it wasn’t for the Chinese EV makers, do you think Elon Musk is interested to sell his Model Y and 3? Just look at the earlier BMW i3, only the rich could afford to pay so much for such a tiny EV.
@frankietam8613
@frankietam8613 5 күн бұрын
Problem with the West is lack of long term infrastructure providing competitive and economical basic cost such as electricity, transportation etc. With capitalism being the key driver, no profit, no investment.
@njjjjjjjjhhhs
@njjjjjjjjhhhs 5 күн бұрын
thanks
@KonglengLee-t6l
@KonglengLee-t6l 5 күн бұрын
So stop being lazy. U invented capitalism duh....
@John-bq9jh
@John-bq9jh 5 күн бұрын
America Capitalism only works when there is no other competition from other countries.
@wenling3487
@wenling3487 5 күн бұрын
American capitalism was NOT good enough before WWII. It was the flocking of European top minds and money which make US as of then and today. Now with US kids flocking into law schools and Wall Street, USA has to rely on imported minds. How much space, geopolitically, economically, and politically, does US have for even imported minds?! If you read history seriously on entire human history, any serious empire can build on dreaming of becoming rich?! Good luck , Americans.
@bobmorane4926
@bobmorane4926 5 күн бұрын
I mean what this guy describes is monopoly and the use of loss leaders to kill off competition. That's throughout the history of capitalism in the US. The big shark eats up the small fish. It's always been like that and the Chinese didn't invent it. So you never had any philosophical thoughts when the US was killing off other companies in other countries but suddenly you cry unfair when it's your turn. Don't worry , the Chinese one day will face a foe bigger than them but for now , they've worked hard to get to the top. You would never call Warren Buffet a predator but you'd call the Chinese a predator. How hypocritical ?
@blueeyes6192
@blueeyes6192 5 күн бұрын
Bingo !!! When China was poor they had pay premium oligopoly prices. The legacy auto makers dominated china for 40 years .
@victorsvoice7978
@victorsvoice7978 5 күн бұрын
Geed and laziness will sell the end of traditional car manufacturers. The only way they will survive is through innovation, automation, and lower purchase price.
@AhmadouSMinteh
@AhmadouSMinteh 5 күн бұрын
European subsidise their farmers so that Africa farmers can't compete with European farmers and even African are not allowed to tax European goods and because of that Africa couldn't still to achieve food security so now European accusing China of subsidising their car industry what a hypocrisy
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
I be believe that subsidies and trade barriers can create imbalances in global trade, and I generally believe in free trade as the best way to foster competition and innovation. European agricultural subsidies do create challenges for African farmers, and addressing this requires global trade reform to reduce distortions. As for China’s EV subsidies, the concern is about strategic dominance in a future-critical industry, which poses unique challenges. Ultimately, I support moving towards freer trade wherever possible to ensure fair competition
@GaryKennedy-g7p
@GaryKennedy-g7p 5 күн бұрын
essentially the West thought they had "organised" the World .... the West would retain financial system and high tech manufacturing, Asia was designated as the centre of low value-add manufacturing and the southern hemisphere would be commodity suppliers .... forever.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
The world has certainly changed today Asia and China lead in many of the world’s most important technologies
@dyrectory_com
@dyrectory_com 5 күн бұрын
Go figure, a good product at an affordable price...🦉
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
You mean the Chinese cars? For the consumers it is definitely a positive.... at least in the short to mid term
@vanyel6591
@vanyel6591 5 күн бұрын
Customers in America want cheap high quality reliable cars.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Yes I believe most consumers around the world want that. At least it is also true for Europe
@chasx7062
@chasx7062 5 күн бұрын
No one wants to buy overpriced American junk
@kasikwagoma6740
@kasikwagoma6740 6 күн бұрын
This american is a hypocrite, he is talking about standards the west should demand and make trade fair. Let me remind him that there is a drug for head and neck cancer,it is produced in China and costs 240 dollars for Chinese patients, but then greedy American capitalists import the drug into America and charge sick cancer patients 8000 dollars for one course. Don't blame China for everything, blame yourselves and your greed. Secondly America does not ever play fair with Africa on trade, when Trump was in power he sanctioned 4 countries in East Africa called Uganda, the DRC Rwanda, Kenya for refusing to allow second hand rag clothes from America into their countries. A mighty America bullying smaller African countries because of second hand clothes. Only one country refused to give in and it's Rwanda. The rest capitulate. Do America isn't a fair country and that is why I as a black African lady side 100 % with china. I have nothing in common with white racist supremacists. Our interests are different, we just aren't the same in that regard, we share nothing not even historically and so if it collapses I won't be crying. Americans who believe in the bible should read the book of habbakkuk, it has great lessons for their arrogance.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Interesting and thanks for sharing. What cancer drug are you referring to?
@shanewyatt9939
@shanewyatt9939 6 күн бұрын
Id like someone to ask him about it being available to the general public
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Hi, we actually did talk about that. We do believe the technology will become affordable in time. So at first it may only be for the rich and then available to most. Some countries may take longer to approve the technology than others. But if you have the means you could travel to China, Dubai, Thailand who will have less “red tape” to go through. Perhaps this video might interest you as well: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mIvFmYePmcadgNUsi=u6lHDHReZNwJKHHl
@shanewyatt9939
@shanewyatt9939 5 күн бұрын
​@@danielkaferwow, thanks for the feedback. I will definitely keen an eye and hopefully when I'm older this will be an option for me.
@shanewyatt9939
@shanewyatt9939 6 күн бұрын
Im 41 and am very cautious yet hopeful that this could make me love a few decades longer than my ancestors. Imagine knowing this was coming round the corner but getting some horrible disease and knowing you were not making it!
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Yes would feel like such a shame
@andrewvercillo7584
@andrewvercillo7584 6 күн бұрын
This country hates Tesla which is making the most American made car in the country. Tesla is making the best, safest, cheapest to own car and so many people are against them. Legacy auto is too powerful. They need to get reset. If they want to survive they need to make a deal with the chinese or partner with Tesla for their FSD and get that in their cars. Help Elon build out the charging network. What are these companies waiting for.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Can you help me understand why Americans hate Tesla, as a European it is a bit hard to understand?
@MuhammadakbarAK47
@MuhammadakbarAK47 5 күн бұрын
​​@@danielkafer they hate Elon musk . Not Tesla. The majority of people who want to buy ev (They want to buy EV even though it is more expensive than ice ) are from Democratic Party (Because people who care about climate change are on the left). But Elon Musk is more to a Republican party . They were so angry so they sold their Tesla. And bought another ev.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
@@MuhammadakbarAK47 Ok so it is more that the people on the left hate Elon?
@andrewvercillo7584
@andrewvercillo7584 6 күн бұрын
What about the American people and the fact that we have to continue to buy these products that are more expensive and not as good. Legacy auto should go out of biz. Let China come here like Japan did and hire our people. But if they come the American people will save money. No longer will we get ripped off by the big 3. They have made so many Americans broke. Their junk products are a joke.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 5 күн бұрын
Interesting are the American cars really that bad today. How do you think they stack up against the European brands?
@who52au
@who52au 6 күн бұрын
Unlike the America CEO and their executives ,all the Chinese motor manufacture don't have the same luxury of a company cooperate plane on their disposal as part of their package millions dollars annual salary ! !
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
True, You’re absolutely right-Chinese automotive executives generally earn significantly less than their American counterparts. For example, BYD’s Founder and Chairman, Wang Chuanfu, earned approximately $922,050 in 2022, including bonuses. This is notably modest compared to Ford’s CEO, Jim Farley, who received a total compensation of $26.5 million in 2023, with a base salary of $1.7 million and the rest made up of stock awards, bonuses, and other incentives.
@frankfurtguide24
@frankfurtguide24 6 күн бұрын
Union doesn’t provide productivity… Union may not make America great again…so may not Trump…
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
True what would you suggest?
@frankfurtguide24
@frankfurtguide24 5 күн бұрын
@ well, actually I don’t have a solution. It’s a quite difficult situation. The union faces two problems, one is the company wants to make money, if they can do it in USA the capital may go to other countries and the 2nd one is the competition from China, which can provide good quality cars and with a good price. As you know, the unions in German also have to face redundancies in the car industry and in chemical industry. If good paid jobs are gong they will gone for ever…
@komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257
@komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257 6 күн бұрын
4:22 Yes that's right . Even technology and industry metrics say so. Chinese OEM can only imitate western products. Will never be able to beat Western OEMs in internal combustion engines full of "patents " . But the emergence of Electricity car raises new hopes. Because electric car technology is still new and there are not many patents preventing Chinese companies from developing. And level up the playing field . --------- The ministry immediately went all in. Create a new university just to Graduate Battery scientists . Make Efficient battery supply chains and investments in new mining in other countries In order to secure raw materials .
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing!
@linkan4738
@linkan4738 6 күн бұрын
Why doesn't anyone say anything when America dominante the world?
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
I think because the US tend to invent new industries like the tech industry, AI, etc. In other words they go from 0-1 more often than Europe. Japan and China were better at coming into the existing industry and via scale and efficiency take marketshare away from legacy companies. Nothing wrong with the latter, the question is, what is the best way to react to it.
@momo_san1980
@momo_san1980 6 күн бұрын
China gets advantage because the US keeps on printing money. Too many $ chasing too few goods/service, the you get inflation. US wages got to where it is today because there are too many $ chasing too little workers
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
True but allowing to automate the car industry could perhaps help the inflation issue?
@JunitafluxcyfatriciaJunita
@JunitafluxcyfatriciaJunita 6 күн бұрын
Many people ask why when legacy OEMs when make an EV version of their ice cars they can be 30%-50% more expensive than the ice version. The answer is economies of scale. So the Chinese government helps companies do economics on a scale. The result at the end of 2024 legacy OEM in China said "for the first time in the history of the electric car industry, it has achieved economies of scale Where cheaper Making EV than internal combustion cars in China."This result can only be achieved after the industry produces 8 million EV (11 Million if you also count hybrids) in a year 2024. But this government assistance has led to overcapacity. China now has 30 million capacity to make internal combustion cars and 20 million capacity to make EVs. Total 50 million capacity while only 23 million cars are sold in a year
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Very good point - thanks
@alfreedng
@alfreedng 6 күн бұрын
The speaker is lamenting the US can't compete with China because they are not on the same level playing field. But somehow he knew that it's the powerful US unions that hindered their competitiveness and inflexibility to adapt change
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
OK but what do you believe to be true?
@MD-ib4ix
@MD-ib4ix 4 күн бұрын
How dare companies pay their workers properly
@thomasrogers9146
@thomasrogers9146 6 күн бұрын
WE FINANCIALIZED OUR ECONOMY, PROFITING WITHOUT PRODUCING REAL VALUE IN THE MARKET PLACES .WHY ARE MADE AT CHINA FIR CHOSING A MANUFACTURER ECONOMY.?
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Thank you for your comment-it’s an important perspective. I agree that we shouldn’t be blaming China for choosing a manufacturing-focused economy; they’ve simply played their cards well. The real question isn’t about them, but about us: What do we want for the future of manufacturing in the US and Europe? If maintaining a strong car manufacturing industry is a priority, we need to take a hard look at the structural challenges holding us back, like labor union constraints and slower adoption of automation. It’s not about abandoning fair labor practices but finding a way to innovate while protecting workers. At the same time, we also need to ask whether shifting away from some industries entirely-toward areas where the US and Europe have natural strengths, like technology and advanced services-might be the better path. Ultimately, the goal shouldn’t be to blame or compete blindly with China but to figure out how we can create sustainable industries that work for our economies and people. What do you think? Should car manufacturing remain a central focus, or should we be pivoting toward other opportunities?
@DimitarBerberu
@DimitarBerberu 6 күн бұрын
FINANCIALISED ECONOMY for profit only = Capitalism. Wise planned Economy = Socialism. China is the leader to follow.
@thomasrogers9146
@thomasrogers9146 6 күн бұрын
NO ONE IS ENTITLED TO SUCCESS. IF YOU CAN NOT INNOVATIVE AND SELL GOODS THE REST OF THE WORLD CAN AFFORD IS NOT A RIGHT BUT A PREVELEDGE. WE AMERICANS AND WESTERNERS ON AN ENTITLEMENT MENTALIST WHILE CHINA OPERATES ON HARD WORK AND INNOVATION.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
You make a great point about how innovation and hard work drive success. I’d argue, though, that Americans are actually pretty strong innovators-look at Tesla, a company that has completely disrupted the global auto industry, or the countless breakthroughs coming out of Silicon Valley. These are clear examples of American ingenuity at its best. That said, the real issue in the US auto industry isn’t a lack of innovation but rather structural challenges, like labor unions, that slow down the adoption of new technologies. While unions play an important role in protecting workers, they often resist changes like automation that could make US manufacturers more competitive globally. China, on the other hand, doesn’t face these constraints. They’ve been able to rapidly automate and innovate without the same pushback, which is why they’re pulling ahead in industries like EV production. The challenge for the US and Europe isn’t whether we can innovate-we clearly can-but whether we can adapt our systems and policies fast enough to stay competitive. What do you think? Is there a way to balance innovation and job security, or are these goals fundamentally at odds?
@richardfranc8512
@richardfranc8512 6 күн бұрын
I thought this is called capitalism. If you create a better, cheaper product then you will be profitable. This also provides benefits for the population. Everyone wants to save money and make their lives better.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
You’re absolutely right-capitalism thrives on competition, innovation, and delivering better, more affordable products to consumers. However, the current dynamics in the automotive industry highlight some unique challenges. For legacy U.S. automakers, labor unions play a significant role in shaping how they operate. While unions protect workers’ rights and jobs, they can also make it harder for these companies to adapt quickly to changes like automation. In contrast, Chinese manufacturers operate in a system with fewer labor restrictions, allowing them to automate aggressively and lower production costs. This disparity creates an uneven playing field. While capitalism rewards the creation of better and cheaper products, the ability to innovate and compete isn’t always equally distributed when structural barriers like these exist. The question becomes: How can U.S. automakers balance fair labor practices with the need to innovate and stay competitive in a global market? It’s a tough challenge, but one that’s critical to address for the long-term success of the industry
@chan400
@chan400 6 күн бұрын
As far as US does, it's capitalism. If China does, it's not.
@DimitarBerberu
@DimitarBerberu 6 күн бұрын
Capitalism is about PROFIT, not competition. They block China's competition that works much better because of Socialism (Stronger & Wiser together ;)
@Photojouralist123
@Photojouralist123 5 күн бұрын
Life is unfair get used to it. It’s my money as an American I was taught to buy what I want regardless of politics
@winkus8586
@winkus8586 5 күн бұрын
​​@@danielkafer You and Steve talk about fairness...... china have a way cheaper labor cost.. you want to be fair???? Ok..... downgrade your country into a developing country with $10.000 percapita... would you do that??? And don't you realise that you are the one who ignored and laugh at chinese EV in the past???? Elon musk laugh on chinese EV too saying it is a toy... 2 decades ago..... You insulted china for its air quality. Feel embarrassed... China made the decision to invest in clean energy and vehicle. Subsidising hybrid car from legacy auto maker are included.. And the investment bear fruits today. Now you restricted semiconductor..... And china is investing heavily on it. I believe it will ended up the same way
@MuhammadakbarAK47
@MuhammadakbarAK47 6 күн бұрын
The most important moment in the history of the Chinese car industry. It was when the Minister of Technology and Industry realized that China would never be able to compete with Japanese, American or European car companies in internal combustion engines . And strive to allocate all state resources to electric cars in 2009. And make EV a strategic industry .
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Yes seems to be a winning strategy, what are your thoughts
@wenling3487
@wenling3487 5 күн бұрын
Actually China starts considering EV much earlier in 1980s. Qian Xueshen, famous for being father of Chinese rocketry, who was widely regarded as strategic scientist, wrote a letter to then-premier of China, states that the only way that China have decent car industry is to bypass ICE car, go directly to EV. At the time Chinese scientists and government started to put resources into EVs.
@nanyanguo1
@nanyanguo1 5 күн бұрын
@@wenling3487 Qian developed Nasa jpl rocket before his return to China.
@dkblack1289
@dkblack1289 6 күн бұрын
Where did the word competition go when it comss to China? America cannot compete unless it blows other peoples gas pipes apart. That is what I call imperialism. But why? Americans are lazy across the board. How are you going to bring factories back with you laziness, and especially with closed border? That is why their insticts is war in order to steal. This guy is talking nonesense ...just war language.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Competition is central to the challenges in the U.S. auto industry. While China excels in automation and cost efficiency, the U.S. prioritizes higher wages and worker protections, which can raise production costs and slow automation. Why do you believe Americans are lazy generally? More lazy than Europeans? The Chinese? This isn’t about laziness or imperialism-it’s about strategy. The U.S. needs to balance innovation and automation with fair labor practices to remain competitive. Companies like Tesla show that American ingenuity can lead without conflict. How do you think the U.S. can better compete in the global market while maintaining its values?
@dahaixing2376
@dahaixing2376 6 күн бұрын
Chinese car cost advantage is not because of cheap labour or less human rights, if you go to any BYD or Chinese EV manufacturing plants, you can see the plants are run by mostly industrial robots. And China installed the more industrial robots than the the rest of the world combined.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Correct ✅ that is actually one of the points that Steve is making. He said that US and European legacy car manufacturers are unable to automate and compete because of the labor unions.
@MuhammadakbarAK47
@MuhammadakbarAK47 6 күн бұрын
​@@danielkafer giga press First introduced by Tesla . But apart from China brand, no other brands have followed Tesla's lead.
@alfreedng
@alfreedng 6 күн бұрын
And then, this is not China's fault. When Apple launched its first smart phone some 20 years ago, Nokia didn't know they're being pushed out of mobile phone business. This is technology evolving and adaptation
@DimitarBerberu
@DimitarBerberu 6 күн бұрын
​@@alfreedng I had smartphones since 2001, long before the 1st primitive iPhone, eg. Siemens, Motorola, HTC... (all with SD cards & stylus since 2002). When Huawei introduced superior smartphone vs restrictive iPhone the US cried & introduced Capitalist measures to destroy competition :( However, BRICS+ BRI are now leaders & Apple will be history ;)
@DimitarBerberu
@DimitarBerberu 6 күн бұрын
@@danielkafer The Labor unions are Human Rights organisations. All-China Federation of Trade Unions ACFTU, closely aligned with Govt. Supportive of tec advancements, incl AI & robotics, as part of country's push for industrial modernisation. Implement retraining programs for workers affected by automation. Help for worker transition to new roles or industries as traditional jobs are automated. Chinese unions rarely oppose Intro of new technologies directly. Prioritises social stability & Govt policies over confrontational tactics. Unions work alongside mgmt to find solutions that balance tec advancement with worker interests.
@yellowsheeps
@yellowsheeps 6 күн бұрын
This guest is literally a moron. This is Capitalism.....what America has been forcing other countries to do for decades with the barrel of a gun. The US can't compete with anyone manufacturing tangible goods because the System has been hijacked by Neo-liberal Finance Capitalism. The Oligarch's running the USA decided in the 1980's it was faster and more profitable to concentrate on the FIRE sectors (finance, insurance and real estate) rather than manufacturing. US vehicles haven't been competitive since the 1990's. There is no investment in research and development in the USA. The Big 3 have said long ago they make more money selling the financing of a vehicle than they do selling the vehicle.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
Well Tesla seems to be doing quite well don’t you think? They operate outside the unions and therefore they can automate as much as they want.
@yellowsheeps
@yellowsheeps 6 күн бұрын
@@danielkafer Musk already said they won't be able to compete with China if he has to relocate ALL manufacturing back to the USA.
@danielkafer
@danielkafer 6 күн бұрын
@@yellowsheeps I think this was when he argued for Tarifs against China, correct?