Except for we don't need a separate entity that is God to feel like everything. Because the universe is within and we are the universe experiencing itself. All that is God as you put it is already in us

That's an odd description for someone who can be everywhere at once but still never shows up for anything that happens to you, good or bad. I suggest that instead of imagining some perfect fantasy being loving you, you do the hard work of making yourself worthy of the love of real human beings around you.

@ Isaiah 53

That kind of suffering only comes from science shattering illusions that religion created and imposed in the first place. We had no reason or right, as a species, to consider ourselves important to anyone except those immediately around us, so abandoning that notion is an important step in our growth even if it has been temporarily painful.

Look more deeply into the world and you will get real scared.

You would also enjoy "Disorientation by Katie Mack"

*When it is so plain to see, for any truly honest enquirer, both in rational philosophy and in the practice of empirical scientific observation, that a suprapersonal God is clearly real.* You claiming that doesn't make it so. I don't find the existence of God plain or evident at all, and I've spent ample time considering all of the philosophical arguments and empirical observations that theists repeatedly offer. While your statement isn't quite what I would call arrogant, it is certainly condescending, amounting to "if you don't see it my way, you're an idiot or a liar," when you are probably well aware that many intelligent and honest people do not in fact see it your way. And if your claim is false, then your conclusion about atheism and humanism being arrogant likewise falls to the ground. So maybe you would have done better actually demonstrating the plainness of God's existence instead of just insulting those who disagree with you. As for Carl Sagan being exposed to the wrong believers, is that not entirely the fault of the "right" believers or even of God himself? If you have the right information and others are putting out the wrong information, the burden is entirely on you to correct that, and show both them and other listeners that they have it wrong, because you or your like-minded brethren are the only ones who CAN, being the only possessors of the right information. Yet we have now had over two millennia of Christians of all varieties giving out conflicting claims and stories, sometimes resulting in widespread death and destruction, while you pity and blame non-believers for listening to the wrong ones, and the perfect God of truth you argue over remains entirely silent on every question. If neither you nor the God you talk about cares enough to get everyone's stories straight, you can't call us sad or blind just for responding to the most intrusive and harmful ones. I wish you well in life, but I found nothing either persuasive or uplifting in anything you said, only condescending superiority, dismissive and misplaced pity, and unsupported claims. Carl Sagan, by contrast, was guilty of none of these things.

Your first sentence contains two strawman arguments, so that's where I stopped reading it.

Life bless Glory to consciousness. I don't need your separate God to know that I have the universe within me

It just did a few months ago in Dubai I think . Did you heard about The strip town ? It is build in a desert