Been telling those around me this stuff for ages. Many don’t seem to have the ability, or the want, to open their eyes and realise where these NGOs and corrupt, global leaders are leading us.
@MACTEP_CHOB4 күн бұрын
Mr Fiber should eat few pounds of rhubarb leaves. Maybe then he will know better.
@robertwhite24494 күн бұрын
Meat does not putrefy in the gut. Theres even a carnivore guy that prior to carnivore had bowel disease and has an iliiostomy bag attached that posted an experiment on KZbin that showed almost zero residue in his bag ( and therefore bowel) after eating large amounts of meat
@toonybrain8 күн бұрын
A terrific trailer: perfect pace, great graphics, riveting storytelling, perfect dose of emotion, just enough of a cliffhanger to leave the viewer wanting more.
@sophiaalila8 күн бұрын
I went off gluten, coffeine, alcohol, dairy, all processed foods and started eating fruits, vegetables, herbs and spices- mostly raw. Pluss adding clean supplements. I’ve dealt with severe childhood trauma and established healthy boundairies in my life. I’ve recovered from a long list of systems and longterm severe illness. I’ve evolved physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually🥰
@eugeniobulla15859 күн бұрын
Important work, congratulations. This must be known worldwide. Could somebody incorporate subtitles in foreign languages? There is spanish at opensubtitles.
@DonnaB-551210 күн бұрын
Hey I hauled a very secretive, highly controversial load to the los Alamos labs.
@kathynewkirk68311 күн бұрын
Using my carb manager has been a blessing, by setting my parameters, I can plan my meals the day before. Learning exactly the P:E principle.
@kathynewkirk68311 күн бұрын
At 15:30! Thank you! Been keto over 10 years now! Love it! But! It worked so well, I became orthorexic! Then I became so obsessive, too restrictive, then bingeing…
@AdriOnFilms12 күн бұрын
I’m so glad farming going to change! We’ve had enough of big corporate farms!
@Phil-hm7ej15 күн бұрын
Be nice if they interviewed some actual experts in climate science instead of Engineers, Geologists, Physicists, Authors, Podcasters, and spokespeople for cli.ate change denial organisations. At least it is better produced than the 2007 version. Same dodgy graphs and manipulation of data though.
@vicki225316 күн бұрын
It’s worked for me! I can’t believe it. 18 years of chronic pain is now down by 50% in 8 weeks. Bloating and indigestion gone in days. My chronic sore throats gone. Everyone really needs to try this if they have health issues. Don’t listen to nay sayers! Just watch all the you tube videos of how many people have had their health issues resolved by eating a carnivore diet PLEASE Just try it for yourself, you have nothing to lose
@evilynn33320 күн бұрын
Its the seed oil. Once you omit it, your carb and sugar cravings go away.
@sojournertothecity403722 күн бұрын
This can also be seen on Rumble not just You Tube - great movie, though I don't believe in evolution, the rest of it certainly can't be denied.
@PeterPluto-b7b16 күн бұрын
Ya it wont surprise me if you dont believe in a round earth either. Ignorance is your thing
@swiftlytiltingplanet848116 күн бұрын
So in other words you are scientifically illiterate. Got it.
@sojournertothecity403713 күн бұрын
@@PeterPluto-b7b It always amazes me how people make a judgement about you from one comment and they don't even know you.
@PeterPluto-b7b13 күн бұрын
@@sojournertothecity4037 You dont need to say anything more ... Your 1st comment was low IQ enough and obviously someone else sees that too, even if you cant figure that out.
@PeterPluto-b7b7 күн бұрын
@@sojournertothecity4037 No matter how SPECIAL you THINK you are what you said was pure ignorance. Dont blame me, ignorance is a choice and you made it !
@annewood230526 күн бұрын
Amazing! just proves what a lot of people believe, there is no climate problem.
@swiftlytiltingplanet848118 күн бұрын
Here are the "experts" that make up the movie's jury: WILLIE SOON: He was secretly paid $1.2 million by the oil industry to peddle his bogus "the-sun-did-it" theories. Even as he published 11 scientific papers, he never disclosed that funding, a serious breach of scientific protocol. Unfortunately, investigators caught up to him and climate scientists debunked his work, but that hasn't stopped him from spreading his nonsense across the internet. RICHARD LINDZEN: He admitted in a Harper's Magazine interview years ago that he took money from the fossil fuel industry. It's a matter of public record that he has worked on behalf of OPEC, Western Fuels and Peabody Energy. He has also been roundly debunked in the scientific literature, which you can see at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: RICHARD LINDZEN. Be sure also to see how 22 of his fellow atmospheric scientists at MIT publicly rebuked his propaganda at CLIMATE CONTRARIAN GETS FACT-CHECKED BY MIT COLLEAGUES. WILLIAM HAPPER: Not a climate scientist. Happer does not work in the field and has published no scientific papers on climate. His expertise is OPTICS. He is, however, the former head of the CO2 Coalition, which has long been funded by large-scale fossil fuel investors to promote the use of more gas and oil. For a complete debunk of his talking points, see CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: WILLIAM HAPPER. Also check out his own American Physical Society (over 50,000 physicist members) and their 2021 public position statement on climate change, in which they call it 'unequivocally human-caused" and "urge swift action" to mitigate the damage our emissions are causing, completely the opposite of Happer's message of "more CO2 is better." PATRICK MOORE: Not a climate scientist. His degree is in forest ecology, but he hasn't worked as an ecologist for decades. He traded sides and now works as a greenwashing PR spokesman for the very industries that he and Greenpeace once fought. Like Happer, he's a former head of the oi industry-funded CO2 Coalition. Moore has also worked on behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute, Asia Pulp and Paper (a logging firm), the CASEnergy Coalition, the Canadian Mining Association, the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada, Westcoast Energy and B.C. Gas, PVC manufacturer IPEX, and BHP Minerals. Moore is famous for his assertion that "over the Earth's history there's no consistent correlation between CO2 and temperature." He then shows a graph which looks pretty damned convincing. Do some digging, however, and you soon learn that he got the graph from coal mining engineer Monte Hieb, who isn't a climate scientist but a climate denier who fancied himself clever enough to plot out CO2 and temperature over millions of years on his own. The graph he slapped together has NO scientific validity, despite its reproduction (thousands of times) across the internet and among star deniers like Moore. Hieb based his graph on the work of a scientist (Chris Scotese) who was not an expert in paleo temperature reconstructions and whose ideas were long ago debunked and supplanted by better work based on actual physical proxy records. The fact that Moore employs a graph constructed by an amateur (and a climate change denier at that) to fool his audience should tell you everything you need to know about his integrity. Climate scientists regard the Monte Heib graph the same way they would regard their kindergartner's first attempt at "art." Unlike a child's first efforts, there is nothing funny or endearing about an amateur's attempt at deception and it certainly won't ever end up taped to their refrigerators. ;) See FACT-CHECKING PATRICK MOORE, CLIMATE SCEPTIC. TONY HELLER (AKA Steven Goddard): Not a climate scientist. He's a long-time internet charlatan, reviled by climate scientists for his verbal sleight of hand, lies of omission and cherry-picked data. MediaBias/FactCheck calls his work 'PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC QUACKERY." Heller's stock-in-trade is conspiracy theories, including his despicable work involving the Sandy Hook massacre. JOHN CLAUSER: Not a climate scientist. The Nobel Prize he won was for work completely unrelated to climate science. Clauser, in fact, hasn't written a single paper on climate change and has conducted no field work. (The pro climate science community, by the way, has 126 Nobel laureates on their side). For a complete debunk of his climate views, see JOHN CLAUSER: THE LATEST CLIMATE SCIENCE-DENYING PHYSICIST. Also: CLAUSER-OLOGY: CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS JOHN CHRISTY: His faulty satellite data has been corrected numerous times by peers over the years. He likes to say that the models fail to match his temperature data, but its his data that fails to match the more accurate ground-based instrument readings, which do align with the models. See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: JOHN CHRISTY. ROY SPENCER: Same as Christy. See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: ROY SPENCER. Also see: SPENCER'S SHENANIGANS.Our Planet, Our Future’ Statement signed by 126 Nobel Laureates delivered to World Leaders Ahead of the G-7 Summit.( 2021), online, which agrees with Climate Change. IAN PLIMER: Plimer is yet another fossil fuel industry shill, not a climate scientist. He has served as the chair of Warrego Energy, Senex Energy, Petrel Energy and Yeeda Oil. Get a clue how you're being played. He's been profoundly debunked and ridiculed by actual climate scientists, which you can see at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: IAN PLIMER, at the Skeptical Science website.
@kevinallen524628 күн бұрын
KZbin at its finest
@Itisallagame28 күн бұрын
This is what it felt like to the hunter gatherers when citizens of the collapsing Atlantis went out to teach civilization again.
@SebB-pg2cdАй бұрын
Some important points from scientists here about the role of the sun, and a funding-driven consensus, but this film also contains quite base rhetoric and many unanswered questions. As for 'stopping people buying cheap stuff', obviously it's wrong to deny people basic goods or to have inequality, but the capitalist system is faulty. We just don't want to replace it with another equally polluting system (eg solar panels in landfill, lithium mining, wind farms killing birds) and taxes being hoovered up by the wrong people. Surely the situation is far more complex and nuanced than this film makes it out to be and all sides should be listening to each other, not polarising.
@swiftlytiltingplanet848125 күн бұрын
Scientists never polarized the other side. The other side was simply debunked, which you can see in the scientific literature.
@ryanbenavidez2983Ай бұрын
Whatever works best for you is the real truth.
@joyfulspirit22Ай бұрын
Share this far and wide
@swiftlytiltingplanet848123 күн бұрын
As a prime example of misinformation promulgated by fossil fuel industry shills and scientific crackpots.
@PeterPluto-b7b16 күн бұрын
How about I share a science book with you instead
@Macioszek100Ай бұрын
Hello Liebe Mikhaila,,, ich hoffe du kannst das Übersetzen auf Englisch ich habe eine große Frage meinst du ich bekomme mit Bio Angus Rind und Salz meine schwere Arthrose,,,zur Zeit bösen Schub, in Griff??? Würde mich sehr auf eine Antwort freuen von Dir liebe Grüße aus Deutschland im Allgäu 🏞️ ich heiße Daniela
@merrilynstanger7241Ай бұрын
Outstanding breakdown . I am no scientist but a critical thinker and this 'crisis 'came quickly at the same time as Covid , and I also noticed overkill in this crisis , the amount of natural disasters seemed to increase 50 fold ..... I then said out loud ' can they change the water dumped on earth , increase intensity in cyclones, storms by playing with the clouds ?' I think they are doing that ! That was given credit by airforce . And last summer here Melbourne , we did not get the 38 deg C days yet ' our hottest summer recorded ' our media ?? Outstanding movie !
@swiftlytiltingplanet848125 күн бұрын
Anything but carbon dioxide, right? Anything but the very thing we have a mountain of empirical evidence for? Anything but what 99.999% of all publishing scientists agree is our culprit? Trust the scientists. The movie you watched is a production of oil industry shills and notorious crackpots.
@kirenpillayАй бұрын
You'll notice that a lot of the academics look semi-retired or retired, which means they don't rely on government grants and don't need to align their opinions with them. If younger academics were interviewed, I'd bet they would parrot the lies we see being pushed by their funders.
@swiftlytiltingplanet848125 күн бұрын
Here are the movie's "expert" scientists, which you've falsely been led to believe have disproven anthropogenic global warming: WILLIE SOON: He was secretly paid $1.2 million by the oil industry to peddle his bogus "the-sun-did-it" theories. Even as he published 11 scientific papers, he never disclosed that funding, a serious breach of scientific protocol. Unfortunately, investigators caught up to him and climate scientists debunked his work, but that hasn't stopped him from spreading his nonsense across the internet. RICHARD LINDZEN: He admitted in a Harper's Magazine interview years ago that he took money from the fossil fuel industry. It's a matter of public record that he has worked on behalf of OPEC, Western Fuels and Peabody Energy. He has also been roundly debunked in the scientific literature, which you can see at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: RICHARD LINDZEN. Be sure also to see how 22 of his fellow atmospheric scientists at MIT publicly rebuked his propaganda at CLIMATE CONTRARIAN GETS FACT-CHECKED BY MIT COLLEAGUES. WILLIAM HAPPER: Not a climate scientist. Happer does not work in the field and has published no scientific papers on climate. His expertise is OPTICS. He is, however, the former head of the CO2 Coalition, which has long been funded by large-scale fossil fuel investors to promote the use of more gas and oil. For a complete debunk of his talking points, see CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: WILLIAM HAPPER. Also check out his own American Physical Society (over 50,000 physicist members) and their 2021 public position statement on climate change, in which they call it 'unequivocally human-caused" and "urge swift action" to mitigate the damage our emissions are causing, completely the opposite of Happer's message of "more CO2 is better." PATRICK MOORE: Not a climate scientist. His degree is in forest ecology, but he hasn't worked as an ecologist for decades. He traded sides and now works as a greenwashing PR spokesman for the very industries that he and Greenpeace once fought. Like Happer, he's a former head of the oi industry-funded CO2 Coalition. Moore is famous for his assertion that "over the Earth's history there's no consistent correlation between CO2 and temperature." He then shows a graph which looks pretty damned convincing. Do some digging, however, and you soon learn that he got the graph from coal mining engineer Monte Hieb, who isn't a climate scientist but a climate denier who fancied himself clever enough to plot out CO2 and temperature over millions of years on his own. The graph he slapped together has NO scientific validity, despite its reproduction (thousands of times) across the internet and among star deniers like Moore. Hieb based his graph on the work of a scientist (Chris Scotese) who was not an expert in paleo temperature reconstructions and whose ideas were long ago debunked and supplanted by better work based on actual physical proxy records. The fact that Moore employs a graph constructed by an amateur (and a climate change denier at that) to fool his audience should tell you everything you need to know about his integrity. Climate scientists regard the Monte Heib graph the same way they would regard their kindergartner's first attempt at "art." Unlike a child's first efforts, there is nothing funny or endearing about an amateur's attempt at deception and it certainly won't ever end up taped to their refrigerators. ;) See FACT-CHECKING PATRICK MOORE, CLIMATE SCEPTIC. TONY HELLER (AKA Steven Goddard): Not a climate scientist. He's a long-time internet charlatan, reviled by climate scientists for his verbal sleight of hand, lies of omission and cherry-picked data. MediaBias/FactCheck calls his work 'PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC QUACKERY." Heller's stock-in-trade is conspiracy theories, including his despicable work involving the Sandy Hook massacre. JOHN CLAUSER: Not a climate scientist. The Nobel Prize he won was for work completely unrelated to climate science. Clauser, in fact, hasn't written a single paper on climate change and has conducted no field work. (The pro climate science community, by the way, has 126 Nobel laureates on their side). For a complete debunk of his climate views, see JOHN CLAUSER: THE LATEST CLIMATE SCIENCE-DENYING PHYSICIST. Also: CLAUSER-OLOGY: CLOUDY WITH A CHANCE OF MEATBALLS JOHN CHRISTY: His faulty satellite data has been corrected numerous times by peers over the years. He likes to say that the models fail to match his temperature data, but its his data that fails to match the more accurate ground-based instrument readings, which do align with the models. See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: JOHN CHRISTY. ROY SPENCER: Same as Christy. See CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: ROY SPENCER. Also see: SPENCER'S SHENANIGANS.Our Planet, Our Future’ Statement signed by 126 Nobel Laureates delivered to World Leaders Ahead of the G-7 Summit.( 2021), online, which agrees with Climate Change. IAN PLIMER: Not a climate scientist. He was a mining engineer for decades until he went into fossil fuel industry investments big time. He is roundly ridiculed by climate scientists. See his views completely dismantled at CLIMATE MISINFORMATION BY SOURCE: IAN PLIMER, at the Skeptical Science website. Many of these scientists are given platforms at the nearly 100 denial front groups, think tanks and websites the oil industry funds. (Source: Drexel University). The most notorious denial hubs of all, however, are Fox News and Sky News Australia, both owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also co-owns a fossil fuel company, Genie Energy, and sits on their advisory board. Always vet your sources before you believe them. The tentacles of the oil industry's marketing juggernaut reach far and wide.
@ngp150Ай бұрын
Ray peat was a genius. Now everyone is basically ray peat ❤.
@ngp150Ай бұрын
I eat 200 carbs a day. In Great health
@brigantia4197Ай бұрын
Gibt es den Film auch auf deutsch?
@אריאלברקוביץ-ת5סАй бұрын
theres one thing natasha got wrong. she said the corporations are based on greed and shes correct about that, but then she says capitalism is greed. thats very wrong. those corporations arent capitalistic, theyre communist, marxist, fascist, etc. theyre the complete opposite. capitalism is having a free market, but those few corporations control our entire food supply. capitalism is small farms and businesses selling similar food and other products and competing with each other over the attention of the consumer. we live in a socialist world at best and marxist at worst.
@joostprins3381Ай бұрын
Give me statistics and I give you 20 ways to read them with 40 different outcomes. A few months ago there was a statistic that the amount of fires was never as high as now, for the last 21 years. I was wondering, why 21 and not 20 or 25? Well, 22 years ago there was a so called heat bubble above Europe, I remembered it because my son was born 22 years ago and it was hot. In France there were loads of fires that year, but they kept that out and were manipulating the people with incomplete data.
@joostprins3381Ай бұрын
We in the Netherlands have about the most efficient agricultural business in the world. Efficient means more for less. Our University of Wageningen is world famous for their innovative projects. But our tree hugging fools want us to skip down in farms and cattle because they account to the global warming, instead of exporting our technology abroad they want to shut it down. They also keep telling us that our nature is declining, but forget to say that in 1800 we only had about 2% of the amount of trees we have today! So many lies!
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
Of all people, I would think a citizen of the Netherlands would be hyper-aware of the 4.37 inch sea level rise since 1993, and the doubling of its rate, according to NASA. Another 8-12 inches is expected by 2050. Yes, the sea can be held back, as your brilliant engineers have clearly shown. But the question is, at what cost? Two states in America, New York and Louisiana, are already spending a combined $100 billion to hold back the rising tide. Miami Beach has raised 105 miles of roads by two feet. Maine this year was hit by a record high tide that caused $100 million in damages. And we're just getting started. Research by the University of South Hampton found that the last time CO2 reached 400ppm, sea level rose 29 feet. The only reason we haven't seen 29 feet yet is time, as ice melt greatly lags CO2. But that amount is already baked in and cannot be reversed for at least a century, even if we stopped all CO2 emissions now. How much more do we want to bake into the system for future generations to have to address?
@joshb8233Ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing, I was told all about this 11 years ago by a very nice person. He said like in this document is look at the data. Models are heavily manipulated with data being removed to suit the outcome. I'll be backing up this documentary for the preservation of knowledge
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
So you're choosing to trust "a very nice person" over thousands of PhD-level climate scientists and every scientific institution on earth, including over 80 academies of science? The methodologies of NOAA and NASA have been thoroughly investigated by independent scientific panels, by the way. No fraud or fudging of data has ever been found. None. Nada. Zilch. Every climate measuring institution on earth, from the U.S. to Japan to the UK agree that every decade has been warmer than the one that preceded it. By contrast, the movie you watched has been thoroughly debunked by climate scientists. Half of the experts in the video, in fact, have taken money from the oil industry, which should be your first red flag.
@2Roger1000Ай бұрын
Has Miliband seen this?
@harrycouture8090Ай бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpmkiWdombljb9ksi=2RTEHkqpvPqkVGJb This is a ‘debunking’ to anyone who cares about viewing things in a balanced manner. I don’t who to believe, make up your own minds.
@JohnDavey-ve2suАй бұрын
That's why I drive a Hellcat. I'm doing my part to stave off the impending ice age. Are you?
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
The next reglaciation isn't due for over 50,000 years. Meanwhile, the melting icecaps have raised sea level 4.37 inches since 1993, according to NASA, and another foot of rise is expected by 2050.
@rockjam4534Ай бұрын
If the Sun was smaller than it is or larger than it is then we would see changes in the climate, but the Sun is exactly the size it should be.
@harrycouture8090Ай бұрын
Whilst I appreciate the sentiment of this documentary, I can’t help but think of the forms of pollutants that aren’t CO2, that come as a result of industrialisation and the negative effects that can have on people. I’m in Bangkok right now and you literally can’t see skyscrapers, not even that far away because of the haze in the air. Bangkok has PM 2.5 and PM10, which are particulates that can be inhaled, are at dangerously high levels. How would the scientists in this documentary respond? I assume they agree these things are bad, despite CO2 not causing global warming. Does anybody have suggestions as to how a society can mitigate the other forms of pollutants, while accepting the use of fossil fuels should be cheaper to allow poorer people more energy to drive their economies forward?
@FoodLiesАй бұрын
@@harrycouture8090 totally different issue. There needs to be regulations on exhaust from cars and factories for example
@harrycouture8090Ай бұрын
@ yeah I assumed this, I just wonder what the guys in this documentary would say about which environmental concerns are worth worrying about. Also, I think it would’ve been helpful to get one or two opposing scientists to defend the CO2 hypothesis because there does appear to be a number of equally esteemed scientists who hold the opposite view with regard to CO2.
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
@@harrycouture8090 An equal number of esteemed scientists with the opposite view? It's not an equal number. It's the vast majority, 99.9%, in fact. That's the percentage of publishing climate scientists who work in the field and agree that human activity is warming the planet to a damaging degree. By contrast, most of the oil industry shills in the video you watched are not climate scientists and have published no peer-reviewed work in climate science.
@stringbeans2utahАй бұрын
Greta is richer than all of us who are watching this. So Rothechilds buddy is not fooling me.
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
The oil industry makes $4 trillion per year in profit. But you don't suspect them of anything shady, right?
@stringbeans2utahАй бұрын
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 it's a business just like any other. Of course my doughnuts don't make 4 million. Shucks 🤣🤣🤣 She's a hypocrite as she jets all around the world to tell us how we should live. She is a Rothechilds including George Soros puppet for their Agenda's
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
@@stringbeans2utah She actually does NOT fly on jets. She either sails on a sailboat or takes trains, which have much lower carbon footprints. A train ride reduces your carbon footprint by about 90%. Greta doesn't get her science from the Rothechilds or from George Soros, which is immensely silly. She gets it from the thousands of PhD scientists and scientific institutions all over the world. Eleven separate studies confirm the scientific consensus on climate change. Look them up by lead author on Google Scholar: Oreskes, 2004; Doran, 2009; Anderegg, 2010; Cook, 2013; Verheggan, 2014; Stenhouse, 2014; Carlton, 2015; Consensus on Consensus (multiple); 2016; Powell, 2018; Myers, 2020; Lynas/Houlton, 2021. In 2021, Cornell University surveyed the over 88000 climate studies published from 2012-2020 and tallied a 99.9% consensus that human activity, not nature, is driving today's climate change. Even Exxon's own scientists in leaked memos have acknowledged that combusted fossil fuels are warming the planet to a damaging degree. Over 80 academies of science and every scientific institution on earth, from NASA to NOAA to the World Meteorological Organization to the over 50,000 physicists in the American Physical Society publicly endorse the consensus position, which is precisely why every nation on earth is a card-carrying member of the IPCC. So fossil fuel industry propaganda has gotten to you. Fossil fuel industry CEOs make over 100 times what climate scientists do. According to investigations by Drexel University, they also fund nearly 100 climate change-denying front groups, think tanks and websites, , all of which make targets out of people like Greta, Al Gore and Bill Gates. Those industry front groups (CO2 Coalition, CO2 Science, Friends of Science, the Heartland Institute, etc) promulgate misinformation and disinformation seven days a week to a gullible, impressionable lay audience. Those without critical thinking skills, education or the ambition to fact-check succumb to the conspiracy nonsense. Worse, they become sales representatives for the industry's marketing juggernaut, repeating what they've been indoctrinated to believe to other gullible, impressionable people. The oil industry's marketing propaganda reaches far and wide. It's also more insidious than most people realize. The world's largest hubs for renewable energy bashing and climate misinformation are Fox News and Sky News Australia, both owned by Rupert Murdoch, who co-owns a fossil fuel company, Genie Energy, and sits on their advisory board.
@patriciaengleman7296Ай бұрын
Movie climatic
@paulhume8083Ай бұрын
I've copied and pasted the link to this video and will promote it at every opportunity. If everyone who watches it does the same then pretty soon half of the world will see it. For the sake of mankind, please do the same.
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
See ALL THE ERRORS AND FAKERY FROM CLIMATE THE MOVIE THAT I CAN FIT IN
@michaelirwin1887Ай бұрын
I clicked to hear Jessica, not you.
@TheMadonnaisaakАй бұрын
please show this to greta thunberg
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
Sure, right after you see CLIMATE THE MOVIE, A HOT MESS OF COLD MYTHS, frm Skepticl Science.
@ritalucas8478Ай бұрын
Why are you up so early - I am always awake at 4:40-5.30 and try an go back to sleep - not very successful at it.
@shadieghaffari928Ай бұрын
Where’s the podcast about COVID with Christopher Dan?
@noelclark693Ай бұрын
Global warming occurs when carbon dioxide gas and other air pollutants collect in the atmosphere and absorb solar radiation that has reflected off the earth's surface. The warming effect of carbon dioxide was first reported in 1896 by Svante Arrhenius, a renowned Swedish scientist. A major source of carbon dioxide is burning fuels like coal, oil and natural gas for heating, electricity generation and transport. Despite the alarm of scientists around the world, no reduction in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels has been achieved, mainly due to short-sightedness, anti-intellectualism and greed. We now have perhaps 5 years left before irreversible climate changes occur, and already there are increasing climate-related deaths from more intense and more frequent storms, wildfires and famines. Worse, it is known that humans cannot survive even a few hours at a wet-bulb (that is, at a saturated humidity) temperature above 31°C, because under these conditions sweating does not provide effective cooling. Parts of the Middle East and India are sometimes near this limit, so that even a small, sustained increase in temperature could cause millions of people to suddenly perish, perhaps as quickly as overnight. Other major threats associated with atmospheric carbon dioxide levels are ocean acidification, sea temperature rise and consequent reduction of dissolved oxygen levels. These changes all have the potential to inhibit the growth of plankton, which in turn could disrupt the global food chain. As most of the oxygen we breathe comes from the ocean, there is no more serious threat to all life on earth.
@timemeddler7730Ай бұрын
They said that 10 years ago...
@happyapilot1832Ай бұрын
Donated for the movie long time ago! Nothing materialized.. please explain what is going on?
Ай бұрын
The uN are part of this hoax/scam, look at the lies they told in the country of Lebanon while funding terror in the name of education.
@swiftlytiltingplanet8481Ай бұрын
The UN doesn't produce the science. Thousands of independent scientists and scientific institutions do. The UN simply acts as an organizational platform to publicize the scientists' findings.
@NadiaH-jj6vh2 ай бұрын
The people who made this film and everyone who appears in it should be in jail for misinformation. Climate change is real, it is backed up by huge quantities of evidence, and it is killing people every year. The criminal fossil fuel industries don't want to stop burning oil and gas which has made them billionaires.
@timemeddler7730Ай бұрын
They arent saying that climate change isnt real , have you even watched this ?
@Rambo97002 ай бұрын
This excellent film has been banned so many times, why? That’s all you need to know about climate change. It’s a scam.
@swiftlytiltingplanet84812 ай бұрын
See the movie debunked from beginning to end by Skeptical Science, which has the highest rating for scientfic accuracy by MediaBias/FactCheck. See 'CLIMATE: THE MOVIE: A HOT MESS OF COLD MYTHS" See also the fact-check from the London School of Economics and Political Science/Grantham Institute of Climate Change and the Environment at FAKE GRAPHS AND DAFT CONSPIRACY YARNS IN DURKIN'S LATEST PROPAGANDA FILM See Science Feedback's review of the movie at REVIEW OF CLIMATE: THE MOVIE REVEALS NUMEROUS , WELL-KNOWN MISINFORMATION TALKING POINTS AND INACCURACIES. Science Feedback also has the highest accuracy and credibility rating from MediaBias/FactCheck. See also AFP's factcheck at MOVIE RECYCLES OLD MYTHS ABOUT CO2, CLIMATE CHANGE
@swiftlytiltingplanet84812 ай бұрын
See the movie debunked from beginning to end by Skeptical Science, which has the highest rating for scientfic accuracy by MediaBias/FactCheck. See 'CLIMATE: THE MOVIE: A HOT MESS OF COLD MYTHS" See also the fact-check from the London School of Economics and Political Science/Grantham Institute of Climate Change and the Environment at FAKE GRAPHS AND DAFT CONSPIRACY YARNS IN DURKIN'S LATEST PROPAGANDA FILM See Science Feedback's review of the movie at REVIEW OF CLIMATE: THE MOVIE REVEALS NUMEROUS , WELL-KNOWN MISINFORMATION TALKING POINTS AND INACCURACIES. Science Feedback also has the highest accuracy and credibility rating from MediaBias/FactCheck. See also AFP's factcheck at MOVIE RECYCLES OLD MYTHS ABOUT CO2, CLIMATE CHANGE
@smid25502 ай бұрын
very good - thanks. I'm watching and reading everything I can about seed oils and your presentations.
@GurpreetSingh-nw7ml2 ай бұрын
good fat is also impotant for brain and cell not only protein