Now I see why no Red states are taking advantage of this Fed/State initiative to modernize the grid, even though many of us are hammered by hurricanes and ice storms at an increasingly alarming rate. You have to work with um....ummm, you know, Beavis and Butthead...umm, haahaahaa and you can't actually do anything efficiently, you have to ummm...., you know, spend a lot of time to screen out the people that might actually know how to best modernize our existing grid, with like umm... competence, experience, and wisdom, and replace that with uhh....anti-carbon and straw, haaahaaahaaahaaa you know, and spend, spend, spend those tax dollars, and make sure it all goes to blue states, and redefine affordable energy by adding advanced affordable green energy that will cost we the people and still not make the grid reliable, don't put it underground to make it tornado, hurricane, and ice storm resistant, don't shield it from emp's to protect it from solar flares or terrorist attacks, and definitely don't use cheap, reliable energy production such as nuclear and natural gas.

Excellent idea!

We offer over 4+ different solar company products.. yes we offer all of the above options such as Leasing, Financing, Ground mounts etc.

This seems overly complicated and vague.. is there a clear and simple flow chart with FAQ's.

One other thing worth considering is the embodied carbon in each type of insulation. Cellulose is sequestering carbon. Fiberglass manufacturing has a higher embodied carbon footprint and Mineral Wool is higher than fiberglass. Spray foams vary a lot depending on the formula but all have higher embodied carbon than the other options. Therefore use cellulose as much as possible and the other things only where they are a very optimal solution.

I had Tesla install a 14.4 kW solar panel system on my house, with no Tesla powerwall, currently waiting for inspection and PTO. I use geothermal heat pump (2 wells in ground) for heating and cooling. I have a heat pump water heater and heat pump pool heater. In total, I use 22,000 kWh per year without any fossil fuel, where my solar panel system is estimated to produce about 12,000 kWh, a bit over half of what I need for the entire year. There will be months during spring and fall (roughly 4 months) where I don't use heating or cooling, so I will be producing more electricity that I will be sending to the Eversource grid. My questions is, when it came to NET METERING, I ended up choosing NETTING TARIFF. I thought that the BUY ALL TARIFF price of $0.2943/kWh is fixed for 20 years and if the electricity price goes up above that rate, I will be selling my solar panel electricity at a lower rate then I am buying it from Eversource. Just want to make sure I made the right decision. Please let me know what your thoughts are. Thanks

Would you recommend choosing BUY ALL TARIFF or NETTING TARIFF if I only have a solar panel system without a powerwall?

Does BUY ALL TARIFF rate, currently $0.2943/kWh change every year or is it fixed for 20 years?

ρɾσɱσʂɱ 😉

Thanks for posting! Could you set up the video to start at the beginning, instead of 4659s? Also, is it possible to shorten the video to remove the empty space at the end?

Great program for the Middletown community.

Very creative!!

What a great program! I hope people are willing to click through and get the benefits of this program.

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere, makes the earth cooler than it would be without the atmosphere like that reflective panel set on the dash. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth becomes much like the moon, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory it gets from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a near ideal .95 emissivity black body which 4) it cannot do because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules. 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. All science backed up by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. www.linkedin.com/posts/nicholas-schroeder-55934820_climatechange-greenhouse-co2-activity-6749812735246254080-bc6K Version 1.0 022721 PACE

good job gentlemen.

Nice work!

Glad the Governor of NH opted out of TCI. I drive a small car, but I'm on a tight budget, and cannot afford to pay this tax. I guess all the liberals that drive Honda and Subaru crossovers, that are gas guzzlers, with Hillary bumper stickers won't be screwing me over. Why don't you people use your platforms and call out India, China, etc that are the real polluters?

You people are fools, just useful idiots for the UN.

CT #EnvironMental #StArt1st !!! #YaWNMoWeR salutes Judi > #chaYng3th3Kod3 > #L3V3LUTION

Judi, you are missed.