Isn't the equation for polar moment of inertia for this problem should be J = pi/4 * (Ro^4-Ri^4) ?
@macc5082Күн бұрын
Best explanation yet. I've watch many videos explaining the CP, and I'm so glad I fell upon this one. Kudos to you teacher!
@CalviNsikuКүн бұрын
I love the pace your explaining with😊...i don't like slow speakers😭
@Salamanca-joroКүн бұрын
I guess we can say usung kirchhoff's rule , that the current that are leaving the junction are equal to the current entering at and since i1 and i2 and i3 are equal to Posutive 9.75 and i total is also positive 9.75 but it has to equal zero I total = i1+i2+i3 9.75 = +9.75 9.75 - 9.75 = 0 So its correct 🎉🎉✅✅
@Salamanca-joroКүн бұрын
Helpful video man thanks , this topic will be on my exams i hope i get good grade
@RahulKumar-bx7myКүн бұрын
I didn't get how the value of Ra and Rb came out to be that can you explain please . Am grateful to your videos and you too
@desicomedytadka55952 күн бұрын
Why two collinear members will have zero force to be in equilibrium. They will have equal and opposite force to stay in equilibrium
@Mirac-wp2nf2 күн бұрын
Why doesnt it end up with zero shear force and bending moment
@ProblemSolversGang2 күн бұрын
your method is great. keep going.
@Gramatron50003 күн бұрын
I'm a bit confused. I'm studying through PMTraining. They and other resources have said that ES = prev EF +1 and LF = successor's LS -1. Not saying this vid is incorrect but I wonder about the discrepancy.
@awalzarshinwari44723 күн бұрын
Dear Sir! work on SolidWorks, ANSYS and NX software's. thanks
@savy69694 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! youre knowlege and video helped me alot to prepare for my upcoming exams. May God Bless you Sir. ❤
@lorisfancello15444 күн бұрын
What a legend
@rosh48675 күн бұрын
Thankyou for this, you made it so easy to understand.
@saarojrawal33315 күн бұрын
In problem (b) at the last the inclined member should also be zero, cause there is a horizontal reaction on the hinge making the inclined member zero with the two colinera members?
@lucia_lush5 күн бұрын
Very helpful , thank you so much 🙏🏽
@mariasv11426 күн бұрын
I am so thankfull!!!!!!!!!
@dingdonghereicome237 күн бұрын
Because of you I got full score on my physics retake 🙌🙌
@divermike89437 күн бұрын
What if you integrated all the way across the beam once for integral from 0 to L. Would that work?
@divermike89437 күн бұрын
Why wouldn't the second intergral for section 2 be from L/2 to L, instead of from 0 to L/2. That maybe a shortcut what you did but I think you would do better to first show M1=Fx/2 for 0<x<L/2 and M2=(F/2)[L-x] for L/2<x<L. Then do the two intregrations and add. I checked it and you get the same result but the shortcut should be shown after the more instructive way. IMHO.
@divermike89437 күн бұрын
at 5:29 the second term integral magically losses the 2 in the denomenator. That it is M2/2EI becomes M2/EI. The 2 just got earased but It threw me off for a bit. Just mentioning that so it doesn't confuse anyone else.
@mtamil69468 күн бұрын
Amazing explanation Better than my lecture
@atiqnajmi11638 күн бұрын
Nice video
@johnmifsud68148 күн бұрын
"one single node" - nice tautology
@Somebody_else_u_know8 күн бұрын
Nice things, tnx. 🤝😊
@tabark57928 күн бұрын
7:37 I don't understand the last activity H the relation is SF we should tack the ES of activity F its 3 +2 lag its 5 and for activity G we should tack the ES its 7 +2 lag its 9 so we tack 9 in Forword not 11 and the CPM will become ABDGH
@kingbadfox24958 күн бұрын
In class we usually add the durations of each activity for each path to find the Critical Path (the longest one), and you are now telling me I just had to look for the ones with the same numbers 😭 U just earned a subscriber for life
@user-kj3nv4mr1s9 күн бұрын
Life made simple thank you very much.. very simplified
@ranafalah79699 күн бұрын
wow best explanation ever
@Peculiar0510 күн бұрын
This was so helpful and easy to understand 🙌🏾
@loganbecker67810 күн бұрын
Thank you very helpful I didn't understand the cutting part but seeing the cut members turn into forces was a lightbulb moment
@imranarif116411 күн бұрын
thank you, very clear explanation
@user-wl5we5sg9f11 күн бұрын
Thank you 😊
@angrypixelhunter11 күн бұрын
Great explanation! Thanks!
@Midas-jc5lv12 күн бұрын
Very comprehensive
@all_u_need_is1_here12 күн бұрын
❤❤❤gangster
@anastarafder263713 күн бұрын
why did u plus the Va at 6:02
@KevinHuang-fy2ce13 күн бұрын
56/56 lessons completed. 32pages of notes taken. Thank you so much sir!
@travoltavatileni749414 күн бұрын
Why did Sir use sin at point B for the y axis? Isn't it supposed to be cos?
@RahulKumar-bx7my14 күн бұрын
I didn't understood the last part where you find the stress of transformed unit. Haven't we transformed the steel into brass when we increased its crossection by 2 times .
@RicoThomas-vj4rb15 күн бұрын
Hi I just wanted to ask if activity C was 80% done, would it’s BCWP be the same as the BCWS because by the time the report date has been reached the same amount of work has been done as the BCWS?
@RicoThomas-vj4rb15 күн бұрын
Hi I wanted to ask, if activity C was 80% completed, would it’s BCWP be 800 because but the time it reaches the report date more than 2/3 of the work has been done ?
@silvergaming810514 күн бұрын
If 66% completed then bcwp will be 800 if 80 %maybe in between
@user-OpFiza15 күн бұрын
Ayein😪🫣
@aofddofa666115 күн бұрын
Uou are awesome ..5 min better than my teacher 5 hours At school
@shayanibrahim.115 күн бұрын
Ans is 0.33433 ohm
@marbles559015 күн бұрын
subscribed. your videos helped me a lot
@tahmidaisra266916 күн бұрын
Thank you so much ❤
@user-hv6ef9ie1g17 күн бұрын
Thanksss
@user-hv6ef9ie1g17 күн бұрын
Wait... i don't really get it. I have a question, so the average shear for two forces acting on the same rod would be 20/A. And in this video, to calculate average shear stress for 3 forces acting on the same rod, we can pick a particular side of the rod and the shear stress then would be P/2A, right? Wouldn't that only make it some-part-of-the-rod average shear stress, and not for the whole rod?