I bet you're fun at parties bahahahaha

@@WyattMcFeelz not if you're serving human sandwiches there 🤦‍♂️

What’s true of animals that, if true of humans, would make you ok with eating humans?

@@eatpvssynotanimals bro can u word that better 💀

@@EvanRoss-fv4ro I’ll dumb it down for you… what’s the morally significant difference between humans and animals that makes it okay, in your view, to stab and eat animals but not humans? Understand now?

@@eatpvssynotanimalsridiculous hypotheticals aren’t arguments

Humans can communicate that they think, therefore we should respect them. Animals can't communicate the same, It is my opinion that the more expressive an animal the worse it is to kill it.

What’s true of animals that, if true of humans, would justify turning humans into sandwiches?

@@eatpvssynotanimals what about bugs? What about plants? Those both are living too. So with your brain dead logic we should exclusively live off of water, WAIT! Water has tiny living microbes in it so that means we can’t drink water anymore either!!! Wow you are smart

@@eatpvssynotanimalscannibalism causes prions disease and goes against self preservation

Animal rights are a logical extension of human rights. I think you need to look in a mirror

​@@animalsareindividuals that's just you opinion there is absolutely nothing to back up that claim

@@darinhilbern3444 why not? Name the trait that makes non-human animals not deserve the same rights as humans. Simple logic backs his claim up.

@@___SourR34___animals aren’t as humans

@@EvanRoss-fv4ro plain and simple isn't it lol

The guy who originally made that terrible and out of touch joke has since changed his ways and grown as a person. Hopefully you will too

Sssshhhhhh​@@animalsareindividuals

@@animalsareindividualscope

Claro! Envíame un DM por insta con anticipación y nos encontramos

Do you have any evidence to the contrary? Or are you just pulling 💩 out of your 🍑?

@@eatpvssynotanimalscope harder

Abuse tho Nice buzzwords

@Assassin99584 u have the same crap responses for many years now. Yet u r such a coward u can't face me in a love debate. Just proves u know u will loose

@@MoistVegan yet you keep running when i ask for your discord to debate Continue showing how scared you are

@Assassin99584 what's discord. I k ow u have your tube. Ur on it now. So I'll send u link and we can debate live.

@Assassin99584 yes just as I thought run away and play video games in your mummy basement fragile boy

Cope

🤣 I’m pretty sure I’ve filmed Lliguer with my mic for a longer period of time.

​@@Assassin99584 Lol, ironic you say that

i am gig

Thats like saying holocausts are good because they prevent murders from happening within the holocausted people. But in the end, there are far more victims in the event of a holocaust than in 75 years of a civilizations existance.

Love your activism by the way heri top man 🤟

The carnist said that he doesn’t care about slavery and that he would eat human sandwiches and somehow veganism looks stupid? 🤣🤡

⁠@@eatpvssynotanimalsCarnism doesn’t exist Ridiculous hypotheticals aren’t arguments

@@eatpvssynotanimals Yes. He's just saying he doesn't give a fuck to be left alone. The vegans look a thousand times dumber. By all means, keep it up. You're saving lives by turning people away from veganism. Between you guys and V-gan Booty, veganism will be down to 0.5% in a year.

​@@Assassin99584 Carnism, a concept introduced by social psychologist and author Melanie Joy in 2001, describes the prevailing ideology that supports the use and consumption of animal products, particularly meat. This dominant belief system is underpinned by various defense mechanisms and largely unchallenged assumptions. Joy's book, Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows (2009), helped popularize the term and its implications. Are you suggesting that such an _idea_ or _concept_ does not exist, because it clearly does? In the realm of normative ethics, hypothetical thought experiments are indispensable. They serve as essential tools for testing the logical coherence and practical implications of ethical theories. By applying these theories to hypothetical scenarios, we can identify potential contradictions and uncover hidden assumptions within the theories. For instance, a theory that emphasizes maximizing happiness might implicitly prioritize happiness above other values like justice or autonomy, a notion that hypothetical scenarios can help challenge. These thought experiments allow us to envision how an ethical theory would function in real-world situations, even those that are unlikely or extreme. This helps us evaluate the practicality and feasibility of the theory, ensuring it does not lead to undesirable outcomes. Hypothetical scenarios act as a "stress test" for ethical theories, exposing their strengths and weaknesses and aiding in the development of frameworks that are both logically sound and practically relevant. Despite some hypotheticals seeming outlandish or far-fetched, they still provide significant insights. Classic examples like trolley problems, though unrealistic, compel us to confront complex ethical questions about the value of life, the consequences of actions, and guiding principles.

​@@Assassin99584 I came to realize that I am a threshold deontologist only after analyzing various trolley problems, what you're calling "ridiculous hypotheticals." If you studied normative ethics, you'd never say something so silly, because you'd recognize that thought experiments play a crucial role in helping us examine and refine our values, which in turn inform the arguments we make for different normative-ethical theories.

Hypocrite

That carnism is 💯 DISGUSTING 🤢🤬

Nah, AN is cringe. Imagine letting the one sapient species go exist and leave behind a godforsaken hell-hole planet full of predators and suffering. I’d be happy to chat about AN with you for a future video. Hop by my discord server.