He was paraphrasing Sir John A. McDonald who said "A British subject I was born, a British subject I will die".

Well he was being a smart ass.. After helping kill 3400 men he nonchalantly said well pearl harbor shoulda been prepared 🤷 smh fuck him... He only feels bad cause his side lost and hit fucked up.. If Japan won he wouldn't be giving a fuck, he only feels how he does cause what he did was for nothing and was a failure, cause again, His side lost

Easy to say now that its 80 years in the past.

The first announcer (program highlights) was Bill Luxton, who did partner with Les Lye for various projects including Willy & Floyd. I'm not sure who the second announcer was but it wasn't Les Lye.

@@michaelmoore1441 Oh. I was wondering who it is, since I like the voice of the announcer who announced the sign off, as well as ident.

The late Frank Sassin was the next voice who did the sign off in that clip

If you're wondering who the announcer was at 0:12, it was Bill Luxton.

Are you thinking about "Chez Helene"? I remember watching that show as a youngster but I have no recordings of the show. I have seen a couple of them at the National Archives of Canada in Ottawa, though.

Probably only cause his side hit fucked up and lost and knows he should be wanted for war crimes for leading a cowardly attack during peace talks that killed 3400 young men while they was asleep pretty much and then he was being a smart ass after helping kill 3400 men saying well pearl harbor shoulda been prepared 🤷

@@jjf5690 if you think something was morally wrong with the surprise attack(Pearl Harbor) then that is your opinion and quite debatable. Here is an excerpt from the book, ‘The Making Of Modern Japan’ that was quoted from the London Times which is from a country that was and is an ally of ours. It states as follows… “Japan also enjoyed international approval and even acclaim. The opening assault on the Russian Navy which came before a declaration of war was described by the London times as an act of daring which is destined to take place of honor in naval annals”. That was a description of a surprise attack during the Japanese Russian war in early 1900. That seems quite familiar to the unfairness or barbaric act you accuse them of against us but yet Brittain, who was our ally in Ww2, seemed to give Japan great acclaim for the same kind of surprise attack under the same nasty conditions. Besides, in my opinion, I believe we knew they were coming but let it happen because we needed an excuse to get in the war because Brittain was getting their @sses kicked and we couldnt stand by and watch it happen. The American people needed an excuse to go to war.

@@generationofbmx if it was during peace talks and against a nation that wasn't even wanting a war at the time and would only enter if attacked I would say it was fucked up too. I can respect strategy and all that but I don't believe someone who helped kill a bunch of ppl during peace talks should be free or alive especially not in the country he attacked.. We killed millions of innocents with atim bombs but yet the ppl who dine it ir ordered it get to leave and go about their lives.. What kinda justice or revenge is that ? How does that make any survivor or any loved happy ? It shouldn't.. It's like a group of Japanese or Muslim or whoever kills someone or multiple ppl in your family and even though yk where they are you decide to leave them alone and just decide to kill some random ones you see who had nothing to do with none of it and most likely was against it and not only do you let them live but let them come live in your house.. That's dumb and pointless... And Britain was the one saying that about what Japan did to Russia, not America lol the last part you said I have always said the exact same thing and I agree 100 percent.. Churchill and others were pressuring FDR to declare war and we was being called scared and weak and that kinda stuff but on the other hand the American ppl didn't want to go to war so he was in a pickle and an attack would get the American ppl behind it 100 percent

@@jjf5690 well, at the end of the day and after it was all said and done there must have been good reason to let Fuchida walk. The Americans in their war crimes investigations didn’t let anyone get away easily and meticulously investigated each individual brought to trial. So, I have good reason to think it ok for him to be let go as well. Also, I don’t think him converting to Christianity was a front by him neither do I think it would have been a reason the United States let him off either. Just my opinion but I understand your reasoning and difference of opinion.

Very easy to feel this way when it's 80 years in the past. Think it's pretty hard to say with certainly how you would feel about it if you were alive when Pearl Harbor happened or say lost family members in it or in the later fight in the Pacific.