5 ай бұрын
8 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@charlespackwood2055 2 ай бұрын
Are you a figment of my imagination, or am I a figment of yours.
@virolex6961 5 ай бұрын
This explanation was very good.
@craiggrant28 6 ай бұрын
Another connoisseur classic 🥂
@craiggrant28 6 ай бұрын
Great subject 🥂
@RoelofdeRouw 6 ай бұрын
Thanks bro. My teacher spent 50 minutes trying to explain, but failing, to explain what you have said in 8 minutes.
@mrvideosforme2 5 ай бұрын
You're welcome! Glad you found it helpful.
@Au-Li- 9 ай бұрын
Very interesting, great video 👍
@ManzaniRepublic 11 ай бұрын
Educating 🔥🔥
@guineapig1016 Жыл бұрын
I magnetize strong with plato
@freedomslunch Жыл бұрын
Did Aristotle ever define "the good?"
@smarikarai9977 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making this video! It was super easy to follow and understand.
@skywalker5thwrld Жыл бұрын
This right here is the absolute perfect understanding of how the cognitive functions of external intuition-Aristotle and internal intuition-Plato work.
@mkarob1 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, Professor. 25 years later after my class, I was able to refresh my memory and help my kid.
@olivierdelacaze9667 Жыл бұрын
Great Content, clear and interesting. I am French but I am following your work. Sending you strength to continue !
@themanthe Жыл бұрын
I don’t know who you are or where you teach but this Channel is awesome
@Saudi_hrm Жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work 👏 kzbin.info/www/bejne/gp6ZnYatgdGNaKs we share a common interest apparently :)
@revofex Жыл бұрын
wonderful explanation. very appreciated
@clearlyclearor Жыл бұрын
Appreciate it proff
@carolinagambacorta4146 Жыл бұрын
I just wanted to know where did you find the writings of Sextus
@BenjaminGunnell 5 ай бұрын
B 504 .S2 1994 182.08 Saunders, Jason L., editor. Greek and Roman Philosophy After Aristotle. New York; The Free Press. 1994
@wayneasiam65 Жыл бұрын
Our politicians seem to use this method ad infinitum
@honesttruth3206 Жыл бұрын
My prof is a very confused person. Thanks for the explanation.
@Silvertestrun 2 жыл бұрын
Ty
@joyjanna4058 2 жыл бұрын
Very nicely visualised, thank you for uploading!
@Vrliq 2 жыл бұрын
I have a final exam tomorrow and this video helped me a lot. Thank you so much ;)
@jiviteshpatil 2 жыл бұрын
thank u so much. explained very well. i have a question. what is internal and external questions of carnap?
@mrvideosforme2 Жыл бұрын
Internal questions are questions that are internal to a certain linguistic schema. For example, take the question "Do atoms exist?" If I am asking this question internally, that is, from within the linguistic schema of general physics, then the answer is yes. Someone speaking from within that discipline would say that atoms are everywhere. But Carnap warns us against thinking that we have answered this question from some objective stance, outside of the pragmatics of how we use the term in physics. That would be the external question. To answer the external question would be to claim that "atoms exist" absolutely, outside of any linguistic schema. That is the answer that Carnap things is not justified.
@aksakhan6 2 жыл бұрын
Its really help full tnxx
@guilhermeadan2329 2 жыл бұрын
very helpful! do you have a video with objections about pyrrhonian skepticism?
@whileibreatheitrytohope1622 2 жыл бұрын
I am using this for a 5 page essay and it is helping me so much, thank you for making this video!
@davidjames3494 2 жыл бұрын
This is how Vedanta came to be formed. The Quietude or Peace of SE is the Shoonyata of Vendanta.
@frankconte2457 2 жыл бұрын
Where is the second lecture on Sextus?
@AlainRobertyellow88 2 жыл бұрын
This was so helpful
@_VISION. 3 жыл бұрын
From my account I agree with sextus. In conjunction with appearances which is external stimuli through sense-perception. It's possible that impressions are added to this. The impression is the abstract thought or thought process formed from the sense-perception (appearance). If, perhaps, to a pyrrhonist the idea of holding a dogmatic belief (judgement) causes suffering. I get the impression that a pyrrhonist would also employ a pragmatic point of view and a perspectivist point of view. So, maybe, Pyrrhonism makes room for Relativists, Rhetoricians, Social Constructionists, and Perspectivists as long as they are not making judgements and holding onto dogmatic beliefs.
@teodoragoidea4005 3 жыл бұрын
Wonderful thanks!
@ghgh489 9 жыл бұрын
it is nicely done... Thank you so much...