In the book of Mark, the phrase "Son of God" is mentioned 5 times. In the book of John, the phrase "Son of God" is mentioned 10 times.
@kadijahtukoromaАй бұрын
Mashallah Doctor Alie
@AllenPayeАй бұрын
They both deserve additional wisdom from the almighty God God bless both debators ❤❤❤
@AllenPayeАй бұрын
Christianity is all we need ❤
@wanangahwansaifulwan8277Ай бұрын
JESUS IS PROPHET ISA.😊 PROPHET ISA IS JESUS.😊 THE SAME MAN BUT WITH TWO DIFFERENT STORIES FROM TWO DIFFERENT RELIGIONS..?🧐 ONE IS FROM ALLAH THE TRUE GOD.😊 THE OTHER ONE IS FROM GOD TOO..?🤔
@NandKumar-qq3xkАй бұрын
Bigg Question that are you or is you Q. Before was you Q. Is you Q. Will be in Future ? Are you ? Or is you singal as Useless Q. Or Usefull ?
@derrisleemusic19982 ай бұрын
Jesus is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
@user-lf2jy4hv6b2 ай бұрын
Whoever say jesus is god are committing the worst mistake.allah cant have son he is perfect.how can you put god to human standard
@joemomma99032 ай бұрын
Sam was being the most respectful I've ever seen
@bemosa2 ай бұрын
The HOLY QURAN IS THE WORD OF ALLAH ( SWT, ).
@ProjectInfluencers2 ай бұрын
1:06:17 I’m a Christian and I think it’s at this point the Christian argument fell apart. Jesus Christ yes was human, but always, was, and always will be God. Even when he came down as Jesus, he was definitely God and all knowing. I think that’s why I think someone in the Catholic Church or a bishop that’s used to going to Christian counsel performed this debate. A lot of errors or weak rebuttals from the Christian perspective. All due respect to prof but it’s like a student battling a teacher.
@nicetravels2 ай бұрын
Moderator is brilliant
@phoenixrider22102 ай бұрын
It's crystal clear, there is no contradictions in islam ...
@mariuscoetzer85532 ай бұрын
Sadly, there were no atheists present. This was a very frustrating one-sided debate. There needed to be someone with a strong character who could correct the creationists' flawed arguments. This pissed me off big time. Seriously.
@6MikeJones92 ай бұрын
I'm shocked to hear the atheist woman towards the end say that atheism is a belief system. Is theism a belief system? No. Neither are. They are descriptive terms about an answer to a question. Is there or isn't there a God. If you answer yes to that question, theism. If you answer no, atheism. There are no systems associated with either. Christianity is a belief system. Secular humanism is a belief system (and also the cancer of Thanksgiving 😂😘)
@user-of7sy1zq8b2 ай бұрын
101 is the answer and the question amen
@emrekerem69982 ай бұрын
1:19:58 cant swallow this dude Shabir W Douglas L
@a16123 ай бұрын
it always amazing to me that people sit around and discuss belief in a invisible undetectable super being and wonder whether that is rational. you have someone asserting there is no evidence of the universe popping into. existence out of nothing. They hang on this despite the research supported by evidence which posits many possible solutions to the question from cyclic cosmology to the no boundary theory. His solution of a deity is anthropomorphizing in it's childish assertion
@Andymartin11754 ай бұрын
How can it possibly be rational to believe in something for which there isn't a single shred of evidence?
@user-ky4xj1ws5p4 ай бұрын
Without god life with be meaningless we have to have something thats greater than humans and the end is god
@nodirtemirov32414 ай бұрын
Assalomu alikum Rajap oyingiz muborak bulsin 😢
@englishquizfactory4 ай бұрын
These debates r boring without the voice of reason, Richard Dawkins
@fabriziocamisani54774 ай бұрын
Believing is never rational, thinking is, also admitting that you don't know is rational, pretending that you do on bad evidence, highly irrational.
@kraidenb.2265 ай бұрын
It's actually quite easy. Believing in god is irrational because there isn't a shred of evidence for one. The only rational position is weak atheism (a lack of belief). Also, the argument about the origin of the universe is pointless... the only intellectually honest answer is that we don't know and people shouldn't be afraid of admitting that. Sticking a god in there isn't even a hypothesis, because you'd need to prove the possibility of god first.
@robertlight52275 ай бұрын
Religion rational? Christianity, the largest religion across the Earth, is based on a Sumerian creation fable about a bare naked lady taking dietary advice from a chatty snake. Really!
@ibrahimyusuf45636 ай бұрын
Do lots of zikr and istigfar always so Allah can bless you
@johnbooth11106 ай бұрын
Al Kidhr i found in the great Mosque in Singapore back in 1975, so he is alive , don't ask me why.
@hafiz50016 ай бұрын
Love you Dr Shabir Ali❤
@robertpundsack13636 ай бұрын
Yes he did.
@tedgrant27 ай бұрын
I spent a lot of time in my garden yesterday. Today, I've got a very small prick in my left foot. Is that a punishment for sin or a miracle ?
@MAC-mp2hu7 ай бұрын
I think that Hitchens and Dawson did and do recognise that religion provided comfort and stability for people. However that doesn’t mean it’s true!
@russell60117 ай бұрын
There is no "-ism" in being an Athiest. Being an Atheist is a descriptive label about someone's belief in the existence of the supernatural being part of reality. That's it. You're either convinced its part of reality or not. Period. Full Stop. The "-ism" sufix ascribes a world view. What is the world view of anyone that doesnt believe X is part of reality? You can't go there. Its not possible to know someone's world view based on what they told you that they are convinced or not convinced of reality. Those are lists of facts to them. The world view is the filter that helps them discern what to be convinced of about reality or not. These are literally two non-overlapping categories. Everytime you hear someone say the word, "Atheism", you know they dont know what they're talking about and are just spouting out platitudes from their in-group ideology. Ascribing "atheist" to a political regime is an irrelevant descriptor to that political regime. Its a completely neutral irrelevant descriptor. Oh this secular regime was brought about by atheists. Oh this feudal system was brought about by atheists. Etc. Its irrelevant to the political regime to add the label "Atheist" since being an atheist literally has nothing to do with your world view or political views; Its as important as to say all the facist regime leaders had mustaches. Facial hair has nothing to do with a political agenda. Being an atheist has nothing to do with a political agenda. You can be religious and secular. You can be an atheist and religious. You can be a theist and be secular. You can be a theist and fascist. Most are BTW.
@tedgrant27 ай бұрын
One thing that has puzzled me for a long time is that we were apparently designed and made, very carefully by God. Yet we are bad and deserve eternal punishment. So we killed his son. Result !
@kawoshin_is_canon8 ай бұрын
so he married a 6 year old?
@pdyt20099 ай бұрын
"Religion should change". "If religion changes, it's not criticised for changing." Yeah. Sure.
@Wisdomseeker102810 ай бұрын
So Kafaah seems more like a reccomendation than something that's compulsory. It can also be ised to grant a divorce if the woman is unhappy with it. Its mentioned that the father cannot cancel a marriage if its against kafaah and if his daughter wishes to remain in it.
@Wisdomseeker102810 ай бұрын
So even if she moved in with him at 9 there is no evidence that says they had sex at that age. Furthermore, theres evidences for 6,8,9,10,15,16,18,21,24 etc so we cannot even be sure what the age was. For me this is a non-issue. Im of the opinion that its okay when a female starts her period or puberty. And sure custom of the culture should also be considered. As for aisha playing with dolls, ill be honest, i myself played with wwe action figures even at age 15, 18, 19, 21 etc
@schrodinger150410 ай бұрын
forced sex and sexual slavery! Soubhana' allah!
@luqmankhan496610 ай бұрын
I belief that Jesus is the power full prophet God create the whole universe but jesus is a human and he come back return end of time
@Haris_0010 ай бұрын
Most confusing thing in Christian is trinity
@AFG-62010 ай бұрын
1+1+1=1😂
@outdoorcat510710 ай бұрын
@45:37 Doug has been rendered speechless. He lost.
@yeshuahelper10 ай бұрын
jesus is king
@syedshah751010 ай бұрын
Christian belief destroyed, piecemeal by piecemeal
@AkariHinata110 ай бұрын
When question is about Tomata Shabir ali answers about Banana
@shayalynn10 ай бұрын
Do Muslims accept the Torah as authentic? Such as the prophet Isaiah?
@carefullychristian865710 ай бұрын
Now the crucifiction and death are well attested by the four Gospels. They may differ on narrative but they all say 1.he was arrested by Roman soldiers 2. They flogged,beat and multreated him 3.tbe leaders of both religious and pomitical were involved and judgement passed 4.crucified with 2.others and he died 5.was buried in a rich mans tomb 6.never was body found The statements of.yeshua pointing to death and resurection 1.as moses lifed the serpent Clearlly he is predicting hanging on the cross and be a source of healin/sallvation 2.destroy this temple and i will put it up in 3 days 3.the sign of jonah who disappeared when in deep of the sea then came back These are explaining the crucifiction death and resurection Either,types or lesson.to undestand He said all has to be fulfilled as spoken in the law,psalms and prophets People clearly show In the above Law serpent in wilderness raised Psalms 16,22,89,110 Isaiah 52 to 53 Daniel 9 Zechariah 12 These are today explained to show messiah would be cut off in death by messianic jews The writings before150 AD in talmud can be shown to point these to be messianic passages Historians have said the most attested fact about yeshua is that he died by.crucifiction Now the Quran read 3 v 55 5 v 116 4 v 157 Reconcile Then shiekh imran clearly says for 1400 we were lied to Jesus was crucified,died,buried and Allah raised him to himself
@ExploreTanakh8410 ай бұрын
I like Shabir Ally's talks and Q&A. They are much better than his debates he had with Trinitarians. 🙂