Excellent presentation, but it would be improved if you added a caption as soon as you introduced a new term.
@TheEngineeringHubКүн бұрын
Amazing idea!! Thank you so much. This will be implemented in the future
@mikountarto2 күн бұрын
Sorry, i am university student and need answer about case 2. So if we used geogrid in compacts fill. Is the failure still exist, if we recalculating soil properties and extending the geogrid?
@powerofdreamx2 күн бұрын
/brilliant
@ddarkjared3 күн бұрын
I would recommend you add a stiffener to the load application location and/or secure the wood to both the bottom and top flange. This should garauntee you see the effects on the section globally rather than locally
@rjserra55353 күн бұрын
Very good presentation. Next time, choose a physical model that has a smaller cross section and a greater length. Yo will get more deflection before failure and a better visualization of the deformation of the beam as you apply the test load.
@TheEngineeringHub3 күн бұрын
Yes, great feedback, thank you 🙏
@233kosta4 күн бұрын
*a LOOSE bolt. Correctly tightened bolts are always in tension until the joint fails. A locating pin would have been a better example.
@MackjSmith-wr4jj4 күн бұрын
For engineer and Archtecturial designers Commercial and
@monkeyrun7 күн бұрын
shrinkflation is real.
@busybeenature90929 күн бұрын
Great. Could understand that the pendulum is set in such a way that it helps the building to survive if the wind is blowing towards it. Am I right? Thanks
@TheEngineeringHub9 күн бұрын
That's right! It's tuned in a way to counter act the oscillation of the building
@shack_6710 күн бұрын
No shit......pretty common sense thing to me
@eartheartbaratheon79110 күн бұрын
5:40 Where does the 0.25 denominator come from?
@GatorVic2611 күн бұрын
I needed this while in school.
@melgross13 күн бұрын
I don’t totally trust examples,especially that are made so differently from actual materials. For this to=o be more convincing, the beams should have been made in the solid. I know, of course, that it would use a lot more materials. But the fact that these are hollow meant the loading characteristics are much more complex. Additionally, the plastic has a different bending modality. Many plastics will crack, or break instead of bending as steel does, particularly A 36, used in most construction.
@TheEngineeringHub13 күн бұрын
Absolutely agree Mel, all of your points are valid. I will look into repeating this experiment with steel plates now that I have a 10t hydraulic press. Cheers and thanks for the valuable comment
@melgross13 күн бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub I’ll be sure not to miss it.
@TheEngineeringHub13 күн бұрын
@melgross I'm testing some 2x4s currently and measuring the reduction in capacity when holes are drilled through them. That will be coming up shortly. Cheers
@ashrafelhamy699213 күн бұрын
👍🏻👍🏻
@letters-ux2un13 күн бұрын
As a layman, I learned NOTHING. But a good tearcher simplified this for me and told me that stirrups as like ribs in mammals. They hold everything together.
@pranavtagore6 күн бұрын
but sir we do not have ribs in lower body.
@yaaaaa.313 күн бұрын
Pllllz can you shaire with us the code w that you used it in the video about Magnus effect plllllz,i really need it
@TheEngineeringHub13 күн бұрын
I am missing some files but I can share what I have. You may need to fix it up
@yaaaaa.311 күн бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub oh that's ok , if you find it please share it with me 🙏
@Astroponicist14 күн бұрын
I am interested in how to modify typical construction calculations for the design of structures on Luna, & Mars. Because Mass & weight are separate functions linked by G where typically we would think of G as always being a value of 1, on Luna G is The acceleration due to gravity on the surface of the Moon is approximately 1.625 m/s2, about 16.6% that on Earth's surface or 0.166 ɡ. but I don't know how that works for figuring out how much load an I-beam load bearing capacity should be expected to change, ect. can you make some videos to help us understand how to begin thinking about the design of larger structures on Luna, & Mars when the supplies become available? thank you.
@growingtruedisciples15 күн бұрын
This was soooo helpful. Thank you!!!
@bridgeconstruction_irwansyah15 күн бұрын
GOOD EXPLAINATION
@typhvam510715 күн бұрын
Question: Why is an I shape better than say, an III shape? Would 3 'pillars' in the same total area be better? I can understand why its better than a solid beam in terms of weight/strength ratio and thus providing advantage in costing less and weighing less, but is all the removed material entirely redundant for integrity or is it just going past the point of diminishing returns?
@TheEngineeringHub15 күн бұрын
It is more difficult to produce due to the enclosed area and irregular shape. Also, if you divide the web of the single I into III (with equivalent area), you may get very thin and flimsy webs that are susceptible to local buckling
@typhvam510715 күн бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub Fabrication and thus cost I understand, and apologies I meant more than just 1, not necessarily that it had to be the same volume split into 2-3 beams, but say, 2 or 3 of the same amount of material, would this become negligible in advantage?
@TheEngineeringHub15 күн бұрын
@@typhvam5107 to be honest with you I haven't tried computing the properties of such a beam. All things considered maybe there is a use case for such shape. Though I am afraid any potential savings in material might be offset by production cost.
@typhvam510715 күн бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub Thank you very much for the response either way!
@samuelmuentes17 күн бұрын
Excellent explanation and skillfully crafted visuals. Thank you!
@MoncefAimeur18 күн бұрын
How shall we repair this type of failure as Concrete Breakout because of anchoring near the edge ? Grouting is enough or not ? also I want toknow how much is the minimum distance between the anchor bolt and the edge ? Thank you for your response
@utilityzc203918 күн бұрын
Why will there be no 'sliding' of 'layers' with respect to each other in pure bending?
@xaviergonzalez582819 күн бұрын
Beautiful video!
@phathufio705120 күн бұрын
What type of materials can be used to manufacture the structure with high corrosion resistance and strength also considering the costs of the materials
@tomsko86321 күн бұрын
Those were some of the best graphics I've seen in these educational videos. Really fantastic job guys.
@TheEngineeringHub21 күн бұрын
Thank you sir!🙏 I put in a bit more consideration into the color scheme and overall graphic design for this video. I am glad it didn't go un-noticed.
@user-ld5uv4uh8m23 күн бұрын
There is a need to legislate consideration of ground geology when constructing buildings as a condition for the housing industry. The ground is made up of a complex of stone, sand, clay, rock, water and air. The stress of the earth affects this and causes destruction. How do we measure the current situation? Is it possible to measure the strata and geology and C,φ to a depth of 25M? Please discuss.
@bobmartin605523 күн бұрын
Very helpful!
@PoorWays23 күн бұрын
I live in a county where there are many 80 year old single wall homes that once in a blue moon face 200mph wind situations and earthquakes of decent magnitude. Always thought the older carpenters must be doing something better to make homes that seem soo weak by current codes to stand up to such extreme adversity. I often pull out 80 year old cast iron tubs whose finish is dulled but barely a sheen of rust on the underside. After your wood video, I wonder if the older things were all superior just from the materials themselves?
@user-ld5uv4uh8m23 күн бұрын
Accurate physical constants cannot be calculated with spt-Nvalue. Boring sampling also performs triaxial testing using pressure-disturbed sampling. How to obtain accurate data in situ?
@angeloissa408823 күн бұрын
Good lesson, keep it up!
@olgajoachimosmundsen464723 күн бұрын
Would a synonym for moment be force or load?
@H34...Күн бұрын
A moment is a torque, or force/load at a distance from a pivot. Just physicists call it torque, engineers call it moment from my experience.
@BritishEngineer24 күн бұрын
0:20 is a foce
@ele485325 күн бұрын
"Why is the 2 by 4 getting smaller and smaller?" Because America became the greediest country in the world. That's why.
@RonJohn6325 күн бұрын
0:57 Large scissors are (or used to be, 45 years ago) called "shears". That's how I remember what the shearing force is.
@Golgi-Gyges25 күн бұрын
The factor of different distances from the load to the base should be examined also (shear+torsional example has load positioned further from base).
@mysticery25 күн бұрын
sounds and looks like a spine.
@asbestosfiber27 күн бұрын
I assume that the offset load as shown in the last demonstration become higher as the load becomes more offset, I'll guess it is probably exponential or close to it.
@Steamrick27 күн бұрын
Does the 18% figure at the end include the shortening of the beam?
@TheEngineeringHub27 күн бұрын
No, so in reality, it would be a bit more than 18% if the beam was not shortened. Good question, cheers
@paulkurilecz420927 күн бұрын
Another failure mode to consider is lateral buckling in beams. Even though the beam may be loaded through the centroid, if the beam is long compared to it's moment of inertia, lateral buckling can occur. Buckling is an elastic instability problem.
@TheEngineeringHub27 күн бұрын
Yup, we already made a video on that. You can find it in our library
@Mikiszub27 күн бұрын
Normal bolt connections are not under shear stress- tension from nut forces 2 plates together and generates friction
@m.505124 күн бұрын
Many connections actually are bearing/shear type connections for strength type loading.
@Mikiszub24 күн бұрын
@@m.5051 that is jist plain wrong. Only if you use shoulder bolts/screws like din 609/ iso 7379. Trust me, I do this shit for living
@m.505124 күн бұрын
@Mikiszub Do you think your measly experience means anything? I design bridges for a living, and we design the connections as slip critical for service loads and shear/bearing for strength loads. I'm the engineer that tells you, the monkey, that bolt goes here.
@Mikiszub24 күн бұрын
@@m.5051 I' d better not drive bridges you design then. Additionaly- I design cranes and other transport devices for living.
@m.505124 күн бұрын
@Mikiszub Hah, no you don't. And that's how all bridges are designed...go check out AASHTO bro.
@moto558527 күн бұрын
0:06 why is there era on an IS-4 😭
@Prando3427 күн бұрын
Such an awesome video. Thankyou!
@TheEngineeringHub27 күн бұрын
You are so welcome Prando! Glad you enjoyed it!
@jeanfrancoisbrodeur27 күн бұрын
Your 3d printed beams and experiments could be sold as learning tools to engineering schools
@TheEngineeringHub27 күн бұрын
I'd happily donate them if any educators are interested (or share the model so they can print it themselves)!
@Goalsplus27 күн бұрын
You're doing well. Keep them coming.
@stefanguiton27 күн бұрын
Great video
@bruce-le-smith27 күн бұрын
The printed props made it really easy to visualize and understand the math, thanks!
@MFcitrous27 күн бұрын
Steel gains strength in tension so the torsional effects are often self defeating in a sense. You can't 3d print a 'model' of a W beam and think that it will behave even remotely the same as quality steel. I subbed b/c your engineering math is very on point, but there are also large practical misses that I also see daily in stamped engineering out in the wild. Legally speaking I'm not an engineer; I merely present them with solutions to stamp.
@m.505124 күн бұрын
What are you even talking about? I know 100% that you've never advised actual structural engineers
@hafeeznoormohamed125927 күн бұрын
Amazing summary. Ive taken full classes that couldnt explain this so well as it's done here in just 10 minutes!
@465maltbie28 күн бұрын
Great way to visualize this, thanks for sharing. Charles