I’m a union Carpenter and have worked on many high rise buildings and I’m fascinated by the tuned mass damper, and would have really enjoyed being at the top when the earthquake happened. The video was easy to understand and the illustrations were helpful to visualize the engineering principles involved. I’m looking forward to seeing more of the videos you produce. Thank you !
@robertreynolds10447 ай бұрын
My name is Bicycle Bob and I approved this message and I'm a 30 year retired Teamster.
@imaginova887 ай бұрын
I also approve this message.
@KainsAddiction7 ай бұрын
Fuck unions
@KainsAddiction7 ай бұрын
F u c k unions
@JohnSmith-kf1fc2 жыл бұрын
Im a retired carpenter and this content was very easily understandable for me. Ive always loved science but i get lost if videos are orientated towards high level academics like videos of conferences on very specific science topics. Your videos could be twice as long and complicated and id still be able to follow. That being said, great video you earn my sub and full bell notifications :)
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Hi John, thank you so much for the great feedback. It makes us really happy to hear that our content is easy to follow and to understand for people of all backgrounds. We aim at explaining engineering concepts with mostly intuitive and intrinsic knowledge through simple illustrations rather than complex equations, though we do end up putting an equation or two on the screen occasionally.
@MynameisLuk47 ай бұрын
Im here because I saw a video of the damper in action a few weeks ago (Taiwan earthquake). And when I saw it I immediately thought how heavy it must be and how they got it up there. But in my amateur mind I imagined that it is a hollow ball which then they filled up with lead or something similar. Really fascinating.stuff.
@tomarmadiyer26987 ай бұрын
That's actually clever. Pouring molten would be an efficient way of shifting the mass
@AName-pp8di7 ай бұрын
It looks like it’s made of slices of steel, I think they probably craned each slice up, and stacked them on top of each other then made the bolted connections in situ.
@ReversePatchwork6 ай бұрын
I am here because of the Taiwan earthquake and because I played a video game called Mirrors Edge Catalyst and in a mission one fell and tore through a building!
@rtqii4 ай бұрын
@@AName-pp8di There is a clip of them assembling the damper. It weighs 730 tons. They used the construction crane to hoist the pieces up and it was welded together to act as a single mass. There is no chance of sections coming apart from the force.
@fahimahmedbhuiyan225210 ай бұрын
I have no idea how to thank you guys...this explanation is just a gem for civil/structural engineers.❤
@TheEngineeringHub10 ай бұрын
Thanks Fahim, comments like this mean the world 🙏
@gary97932 жыл бұрын
As an engineering student i definitely find this channel more than interesting. Thanks for the content!!
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoy it!
@poppy55157 ай бұрын
Great explanations! Thank you. Technical enough to be not simplistic or dumbed down. Good graphic to accompany the technical part. Two thumbs up!
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@hlbrbck22737 ай бұрын
I wanted to know and this video was simple enough and technical enough for me to grasp and understand. I also appreciate your ending comments regarding other factors/forces that must be considered. I am not a science/engineer minded person but have a great respect and interest. This video allows me to learn AND understand enough!!
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
I love reading comments like this; it's so rewarding! Thank you for stopping by and also for taking the time to write this. Cheers!
@colvinator1611 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting indeed ! Thanks a lot. I can appreciate the technical challenges presented to the structural designers.
@ansible93402 жыл бұрын
Great video, btw don't shy away from things getting too complicated.
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Thanks, will keep that in mind!
@lindsay_18492 жыл бұрын
Such a great video David!
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Lindsay✌🏻😊
@SJR_Media_Group2 жыл бұрын
Great video... your presentation of complex concepts were delivered in everyday terminology. There was enough information detail to keep engineering geeks like me attentive. I can recall several structures classes in college. We discussed building sway and it's effects on buildings. The primary concern is structural, building has to stand, not collapse. The second concern is motion that might cause a building occupant to literally get sea sick. I have been in a number of high rises. On several occasions wind did make building sway. The motion was very slow and barely noticeable to the average person. I knew it was swaying because I sighted edge of window frame on a distant object. It appeared as if the distant object was moving, but the object I stood in (high rise) was actually moving. The poor guys who really have it bad on a windy day are the window washers. I think I'll pass. I'm not afraid of falling from extreme heights, I'm afraid of extreme stopping when I hit the ground.
@forkliftofzen53187 ай бұрын
I live where ground-level straight-line wind speeds well in excess of 100 KPH are common and we never have rail cars of any kind blow over.
@TheCerovec7 ай бұрын
Exactly. In my country,in the coastal regions we have 100km/h wind gusts. And we also don't have train carts flipping over.
@kafka96272 жыл бұрын
Im a non engineer interested in engineering and this video was the perfect mix of details and not details. I loved when you said that xyz are simplifications - it sparked more curiousity while making me able to understand instead of getting bogged down in details - BUT, and this is critical, I also didn’t have to get stuck on not understanding how or why that thing is
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Alice, comments like this is what gives us the motivation to produce more content. We are so happy you liked our video. Regards!
@stevemyers20922 жыл бұрын
All of it. I live in Vancouver BC - we have a building here that has a center core and the "building is hanging from that internal tower by cables and rubber" it works.
@JoseJimenez-we3te7 ай бұрын
Excellent, concise and clear video. I look forward to exploring more of your videos.
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
Awesome, thank you very much Jose!
@NZdazza7 ай бұрын
Well done, that was relatively easy for this non tech guy to understand
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
thank you, I am glad 🙏
@davidgriffiths76967 ай бұрын
It was easy to understand. Mechanics is simple. Cross wind displacements and torsional displacements should be added, as the other stuff about resonance, height, stiffness etc is well known and self evident. I invented a new structural innovation to my self build house with a 2 metre cantilever: prestressed steel springs that ingeniously pivots the entire weight of the overhang section back to the centre of the structure as an equal and opposite moment. This prevents strain deformation of the timbers over time, as the springs react with the same force as the weight of the over hang. The half ton over hang is thus supported by embodied field repulsion in the bent springs. Good video, clear, concise…engineers should govern nations instead of criminals.
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
Thank you sir! You are absolutely right, vortex-induced-vibration and torsional loads are often much more difficult to deal with but less known to the average viewer. Also your beam element sounds very interesting! Cheers and thanks for stopping by!
@davidgriffiths76967 ай бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub maybe…perhaps you could include some fluid dynamics, periodic vortical regimes, chaotic regimes v wind velocity, resulting asymmetric pressure differentials leading to twisting forces on steel frames opposed for example by our good friend the triangle brace.
@damienhudson80287 күн бұрын
No training and basically a humanities nerd, but very easy to understand the principles in the video. Thanks.
@dhlong16977 ай бұрын
Every time I visit Taipei, I revisit Taipei 101--just to gaze at the pendulum.
@engrfawadiqbalkhan78611 ай бұрын
I appreciate your efforts ,brief and concise video .Thankyou for sharing , Tall structures are more vulnerable to wind loads because the frequency of wind loads and tall structures is lower there is high probability of frequencies' matching and resonance will occur if frequencies are matched and as a result violet shaking of the building will occur .
@ravshanbekmavlonov29962 жыл бұрын
Great video! The whole world using your content to get new knowledge.
@duderino1950 Жыл бұрын
I’ve just discovered your excellent channel and subscribed immediately. The people who will be interested in watching your explanations will also have some grasp of at least basic physics and math so I 8:23 think you could easily delve into a bit of this. You could even have a few lectures covering basic concepts of structural engineering and materials. I’d love to see them. A good educator does not talk down to the level of his audience, he or she stretches their understanding up. It’s called learning.
@TheEngineeringHub Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback, duderino. I hope you didn't feel that I talked down to the audience. I just wanted to ensure that everyone is still on board and get a feel for what the audience appreciates and wants more of. Cheers!
@hg2.7 ай бұрын
Good introduction. Now I'd like to see a level 2 of this material, focusing on earthquakes. There is a video of the Taipai Tower during the latest earthquake. I sort of "get" how the damper works, but I want to see it second-by-second, with a contrast of what would happen if the damper weren't there.
@kevin933Ай бұрын
How do they account for making the cables strong enough to hold such a heavy object without putting too much stress on everything else supporting it? How are they maintained or repaired if something goes wrong?
@busybeenature90925 ай бұрын
Great. Could understand that the pendulum is set in such a way that it helps the building to survive if the wind is blowing towards it. Am I right? Thanks
@TheEngineeringHub5 ай бұрын
That's right! It's tuned in a way to counter act the oscillation of the building
@jovenjuli2 жыл бұрын
Your simplified explanation is on point, keep it up.😊
@sarahdale53793 ай бұрын
I found that my understanding of natural frequency was cemented using the analogy of a person pushing a swing. The natural frequency of the swing is when no one is pushing (or self propelling) the swing. It will eventually stop, of course, because of friction. To keep it moving requires a driving force. This must be equal to the natural frequency of the swing. So you must match the frequency of your pushes to the natural frequency of the swing. It's interesting because we just do it instinctively! But there is science behind it.
@TheEngineeringHub3 ай бұрын
This is amazing because I always thought of it the same way! This analogy is like taken directly out of my mind. Love to see other people thinking the same!
@stevelawrie70877 ай бұрын
Good video, thanks, very understandable
@omniyambot98762 жыл бұрын
wait what? I'm watching a video with less than 10k views? Excellent excellent job. Please make it more technical, I'm assuming people are more curious to know more! I'm confused with this mass damper thing for a long time since I was a child because I thought it will only transfer the kinetic energy to the "mass damper" and still, what's the point? they will reach an equibillibrium then the overall energy of the sway is still the same. Thanks for reminding me what the "damper" means lol. Apparently, it dissipates heat, which makes absolute sense. Gonna binge watch your videos bro. Sorry for bad English.
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Omni, we are so glad you found the video interesting. We will keep doing what we are doing and hopefully more people will start enjoying our channel in the future.
@brucelomax33752 жыл бұрын
I speak only English and your is better than anything else could I could speak.
@omniyambot98762 жыл бұрын
@@brucelomax3375 I've just learned 80% watching youtube and reading comments and also commenting. Thanks man.
@TrggrWarning2 жыл бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub awesome!! this gets us closer to the answer i asked in other vid. Thank you
@maryguthrie2587 ай бұрын
Wonderfully explained, easy to understand. Thanks so much for this information.
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
Thank you Mary for tuning in 🙏. Regards!
@JamesPfeiffer-z2j7 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing. I am not connected with engineering but found this most interesting 😊.
@joeblough46057 ай бұрын
Good video, thanks.
@gerardomoonshine49847 ай бұрын
Fine explanation. Thanks
@iPigee2 ай бұрын
Very little, but only towards the end. Thank you.
@brickmansconstruction86964 ай бұрын
Hello from 🇺🇸!! I’m very proud of what our Chinese friends have done for their country! We want to visit China and embrace its long history. We wish our government would stop fighting because all we have is eachother
@Fiffa-s3xАй бұрын
Taiwan is not part of China. You can visit Taiwan freely, and it's great.
@catherinevankampen12628 ай бұрын
My kids & I just watched! We learned a lot. Probably 30% was too difficult, but I am ok with that as I mostly focus on History so my science knowledge needs work! We subscribed! Also, I was up in Tapei 101 in the fall of 2004 and got to see the ball....so cool.
@TheEngineeringHub8 ай бұрын
That's great! Thanks for taking the time to write this feedback. I really enjoy when viewers express their opinions. The mass-tuned damper concept is extremely interesting and has many applications. If your kids found it cool; it may be good to consider a career in engineering ☺ When I was a teenager I was always fascinated by technologies like this. It led me to the engineering field. Never regretted that decision. Cheers and thanks for the subscription!
@Mike-vr4lw7 ай бұрын
Great video, educational, fun, and understandable. Thanks, I've subscribed 😀
@Fiffa-s3xАй бұрын
Really interesting video! I understood a lot, but not all of it. To my shame, I dined at 101 last year, and didn't pick up on the engineering solutions, in spite of an interest in the topic. Now i know. Many thanks!
@victorcarubelli7 ай бұрын
Great video! Simple and objective, thank you
@marcse7en7 ай бұрын
Surely swaying of tall buildings will cause damage to the fabric of the building, especially cumulative damage over time? For example, stress cracks, metal fatigue, and the like? I'm assuming that routine checks will monitor for this? Q: A question is "weighing" on my mind! ... What happens to the people and floors underneath the 730 ton Taipei ball, should it fall? ... Nothing good, I'll wager? ... The engineers will be in "bits?" They'll be "crushed?"
@TheBuildingExpert2 жыл бұрын
great video 👍
@chanmakaravat93982 жыл бұрын
Amazing video, what software you are using (at 7:17) to model the structures with and without tune mass damper. I should try modeling myself and see. Thank you bro
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Chanmakara, the software is called Algodoo and is free. It is a good physics engine for modeling all sorts of physics. See link: www.algoryx.se/algodoo/#:~:text=Algodoo%20is%20FREE%20for%20Windows,scenes%20that%20have%20been%20shared.
@chanmakaravat93982 жыл бұрын
Appreciate it.
@flourishomotola53062 жыл бұрын
High quality video. Thanks a lot bro 🙏🏿
@jarvisa123457 ай бұрын
A video showing the Taipei 101 damper swaying during an earthquake: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ipzdZ5VthpiXiM0
@cheeseisdelicious111 Жыл бұрын
Excellent video, completely understandable and thoroughly fascinating.
@dwaynemurphy8229 Жыл бұрын
Great video! Well explained.
@Myrslokstok7 ай бұрын
I think it is not only the wind pushing, it is also the sucking on the other side!
@pieteri.duplessis2 жыл бұрын
Well done.
@smitrotti7 ай бұрын
Very interesting.
@JaymesEaston Жыл бұрын
Outstanding!
@alideep96562 жыл бұрын
All of it, it's full of useful information, thank you ✌🏻✌🏻
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ali, we are glad you enjoyed it! Makes it worth the time!
@hafeeznoormohamed12592 жыл бұрын
very well done!
@Isidore_Chitosi2 жыл бұрын
amazing innovation🙌
@academiceducation97802 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@neelamrani-vy3yz2 жыл бұрын
Please make video on power spectrum of wind
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Hi neelam, thanks for the comment, noted!
@ironteacup25692 жыл бұрын
Go into all the details please
@prodiptobhakta65872 жыл бұрын
thanks
@spiralminus7 ай бұрын
As a baker when I watch engineering videos it makes me wish I stayed in school.
@neelamrani-vy3yz2 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@ajazmahemoodsayyed41222 жыл бұрын
Amazing sir
@ezegroup22 Жыл бұрын
I understand!
@mist2737 ай бұрын
5:20 Eiffel Tower: 😎
@steelramesh2 жыл бұрын
nice one
@Hexagon2342 жыл бұрын
WOW I NEVER NOTICED TAIWAN NOW HAS 3D I WAS WAITING FOR SO MANY YEARS FOR TAIPER 101 TO GET A 3D IN GOOGLE EARTH
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
hah! we are glad that is available for you now
@Hexagon2342 жыл бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub yeah I never noticed that Taipei has a 3D I was waiting for so many years
@Zorlof7 ай бұрын
Having bought an engineered building and seeing it fail during an ice storm, I have zero confidence in Engineers. You would not catch me in a structure that involved the "engineering" principles of late.
@sterlingwallstrum89752 жыл бұрын
What software is shown @7:17?
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
It's a free physics engine called Algodoo. www.algodoo.com/
@sterlingwallstrum89752 жыл бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub Very Cool! What a great learning tool! And is that device at the bottom reading groundmovements or inducing them?
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Yes absolutely, it's a very interesting tool to play with! That device at the bottom is recording/monitoring the oscillations at the top of the model. The induced displacement here is from a wind force distributed along the building's height.
@Rafal_Stajniak2 жыл бұрын
limit, hmm, this is only for concrete buildings, because they are weak and brittle, while metal is flexible, and now you can build a twelve-kilometer tall skyscraper vertically, :)
@TheEngineeringHub2 жыл бұрын
Hi Rafal, for sure steel is more ductile than concrete but when it comes to flexibility of skyscrapers the height is by far the most important parameter. It appears cubed in the formula so it affects the behavior in a nonlinear manner. The flexibility of tall structures is great for earthquakes but does not do well with typhoons. The resonance frequency of the wind gusts is low enough (high period of vibration) to match the vibrations of a skyscraper and then problems occur. Anything above 500m tall requires a careful aerodynamic analysis.
@Rafal_Stajniak2 жыл бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub Hello - according to my calculations, the height of a steel or metal skyscraper must be proportional horizontally to ensure its stability, it is not profitable to build skyscrapers on a small area and spend enormous money on the quality of materials, the currently known method of building skyscrapers on a small area is not profitable because such structures are just covered by the height limit, one particular skyscraper will be enough than ten small ones, and this action reduces the cost of maintaining the building
@Rafal_Stajniak2 жыл бұрын
@@TheEngineeringHub hello - I designed my skyscraper which at the base, one of the sides of the wall, is 1000 m, and is 4000 m high, the top roof is 70 m, looks almost like a pyramid, and is stable, it is only a design, real, to be done, the cost of construction exceeds the cost of high-rise buildings at present
@ReversePatchwork6 ай бұрын
I am here because of the Taiwan earthquake and because I played a video game called Mirrors Edge Catalyst and in a mission one fell and tore through a building!
@MrMockingbird1313 Жыл бұрын
Most of the video was understandable. But, I had trouble with the names of the places. Consider adding a few subtitles.
@randyfitz83107 ай бұрын
You don’t need to “dumb it down” this much.
@WarriorofCathar2 ай бұрын
Simple. It's representative of Taiwan's massive balls
@EricPham-gr8pg7 ай бұрын
It can fall down
@kapparex49594 ай бұрын
who watching this video at 3 am?
@TheEngineeringHub4 ай бұрын
@@kapparex4959 haha love it 😅
@HDXFH7 ай бұрын
5:00 weght lol
@janl89167 ай бұрын
What I find difficult to understand is, that someone with a decent enough command of English to narrate a video could be oblivious to the pronunciation of the "ch" sound in words like technology or technical. How could you go through life, learning all the engineering jargon and yet look past something as simple as the pronunciation of a pair of letters
@TheEngineeringHub7 ай бұрын
I could have definitely done better here. It sounds like this video needed a few more narrations before getting to the final version. But if that's the main mispronunciation that you picked up than I am actually happy. Obviously English is not my first language so I mispronounce words often. Especially when I am focusing on something technical, as if the language part of my brain just turns off so that the mathematical part can get a bit more compute.
@caangngungkulanpoek16047 ай бұрын
👍👍
@its_blacknblue16 күн бұрын
Whose watching in 2024
@peternicholsonu6090 Жыл бұрын
Sway too much for me.
@pradap22982 жыл бұрын
savants
@kytddjj2 жыл бұрын
.
@pluto90008 ай бұрын
..
@kenseavey91652 ай бұрын
General Public Approved!!
@HRubeus7 ай бұрын
Nobody says that the project of the pendulum was made by Ing. Renato Vitaliani of Padua, Italy!