Its not a conspiracy theory at all. Over time and around the world, collections of writings have been written under a false name. Homer was supposedly blind. Blind Harry supposedly wrote "The Wallace".

Skakespeare did NOT write the 37 plays attributed to him. Earl of Oxford wrote all or most of them!

Only someone at the VERY TOP of the social scale could have written these plays. Prince Hal 'slumming it' with Falstaff; mocking Malvolio - the educated, one of the Middle Classes; How the loss of immense power affects the ugly ego of King Lear - Only someone very close to the Court could be a witness to this in reality. - The Top love the lower orders, they were no threat...just give 'em a fountain of wine and a parade! But, people with brains and education, the emerging Middle Class are to be feared...because they see what's going on.

Shakespeare was Roman Catholic.

Great presentations! One small point of fact, about @3:00 - I think Henry VIII was excommunicated by Pope Paul III, in December 1538. Interesting, now that I think of it, as I see from the next presentation, that is the same year in which John Bale's King Johann was written.

This Bacon stuff is un listenable. The presenter is a serial asserter who consistently fails to gve evidence, make logical arguments, or convincingly accomplish her own goals. It is a kind of offensive, frankly.

A very welcome addition to the body of SAR presentations. A great stirring will this create in those with open minds. Find that wordsmith Tom Woosnam has really begun to strike the metal soundly, with the tact of a religious focus and the Cultural preoccupation with same being the ruling force by which all aspects of Society Great & Small were compelled through the orifice of Ecclesiastical Homogenization as dictated by Rome. Henry VIIIs' compunction was not greed so much as claiming Sovereignty. Thomas Cromwell & Woolseys' plan for the reformation of the Church is very much key to this crux of the matter. The Queen Consorts of England, Spain, France & Scotland all being in the Thrall of the court of St.Peters was a deliberate stepwise policy to extinguish any breath of contention to the policy of Rome like Constrictors inexorably throttle their prey. In as much as Tom sees King John vis a vie Johnathan Bales' History play as the progenitor of the anti-papal basis for the Reformation, seems tolerable however it is more seemly that Philip "the Fair" in his "Captivity of Avignon" and sizing of the Lands & Chattels of the Templars in 1307 informed Henry VIII properly as to how it was possible to claim ones own "Divine Right". Tom invokes the name of Bale however in doing so does not put the flesh to the bone of how Bale was in the Employ of the Sixteenth Earl of Oxford and wrote not only the Historical King John but as well the play "Sir John Oldcastle" that fully informs the person of Sir John Falstaff in Henry IV and is a total rewrite for Sir John Oldcastle satisfying the descendants Oldcastles' Wife, from whom he derived his title "Lord Cobham" who did not want to be reminded of their families past heretical involvement with such a Notorious Lollard as Oldcastle, which was why the character was renamed Falstaff. kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpCylZiorNB0qrMsi=lOVSmqEtUID0wJFq. (this talk really sets up the Lollard potential involvement in Henry VIII Reformation) To truly find the source of the underground stream which bubbled up in the person of John Wycliffe (c13700) to herald the dawn of the Reformation one must look at the first Crusade in Europe and not the one that they want you to think of which was fought in the Levant, but rather the one which was First declared by the Pope in the south of France against the Cathars; granting indulgences, absolutions, land and privileges for any and all that would rape, murder & rob in the name of Rome. (Please see Conquistador ie.Cortes the Killer. Jesuit's and the RC tradition) This is where the facts lead and where any Shakespearean dedicated to Truth writ large must travail. Cathars, Templars, Wycliffe, Lollards, Bale, Edward deVere and his families involvement with the elevation of the Vernacular and it's standardization through the printing of the KJV and the first folio is shaking the foundations of Academia and the powers that be which have sought to erase him from history and suppress the Freedoms of mankind his writings represent. These are broad strokes but the details hold up well to closer scrutiny. Just as the technological innovation of the Printing press destroyed the tyrannical rule of the Pontiff, Bishops, Cardinals of Rome and led to the freedoms we in the West consider our birthright, the evolution of the VCR precipitated the fall of the Soviet Union once the masses saw that there was another World that was theirs for the asking. Our present Iconoclastic moment has come with the "Cloud of Voices" which no regulatory body can hold back if we claim our birthright and say no to internet censorship and keep our freedoms free. Foxes Book of Martyrs, Bales surviving works and the Histories of the other suppressed sects of Martyrs, Dissenters & non-conformists are essential to opening the mind to who and how we have been controlled by - to what end. I can't believe I'm citing NPR but here goes. www.npr.org/2021/09/15/1034745716/atrocities-of-conquistadores-take-shape-in-new-history-by-mexican-born-author

Are there any sources as proof or evidence of England being an unwilling country to convert, or accept a different religion? @10:19 I would very much like historical based documents and such. I'm not doubting this or anything, but if it is ture it need to be proven. I would like to use this but with some backing and not hearsay. It plays into my legal studies and would lije to defend certain concepts when chalkenged and this with sources would aid in proof of such concepts.

This is great! Thank you so much to all the presenters and for the SAR for posting. ❤❤🎉

This video would have been much stronger if it had noted that an archaic meaning of the word “main” is ocean.

If you roofed a house with shake and added a spare row, there is some chance it would fall off, full extraneous

The enormous supernova SN1604 is not in the works. Everyone alive at the time knew about it. Waugh's solution to the Sonnets is unarguable, but is effortlessly dismissed. Stritmatter's solution to Paladis Tamia is likewise. IMHO, if this guy is in he has to be part of the scriptorium. We know who VVilliam Shake-Speare was. Great presentation thanks

30:20 what is the source for Oxford knowing Greek, which stuff like Aeschylus might not even be translated yet into English. Can't get inspiration on these guys from Plutarch alone.

Of all the alternate candidates, Oxford checks far more boxes than the next nearest candidate. The more you research the subject the more obvious it becomes that Oxford is the true author.

BRAVO

One of the best lectures on the subject I have heard. Inquiry: Could the "bad quartos" have been penned by say a less sophisticated writer, someone like Oxford or Sackville, and then later "touched up" by Ben Johnson for the First Folio?

Bravo!

122 likes after 2 years. This should be good.

If we accept the evidence of the ecologue on page 238 of the Old Arcadia, Languet should be pronounced with a hard t.. The Songe I sange oulde Languette had mee taughte, Languette the Shepehearde best swifte Ister knewe, For Clerckly reade, and hating what ys naughte, His faythfull harte, Cleane mowthe and handes as trewe, With hissweete skill, my skilless youthe hee drewe, To have a feeling Taste of hym that sittes, Beyonde the Heaven, farre more beyonde oure wittes.

what an interesting video 😊 thank you for sharing it ❤

Concerning Stylometric analysis using Edward II as the Marlowe example .... I attempted this and realised almost immediately that there were stylistic anomalies in that work which make it significantly different to Marlowe's other plays, and therefore not a good example for comparison. The language of The Jew of Malta and Doctor Faustus are arguably closer to Shakespeare than to Edward II

Where did Florio want his library of books to go after he died? Unfortunately that critical destination is unintelligible in both audio and captions. Do we know why Herbert rejected Florio 's request?

Respectful corrections to Bonner's otherwise informative presentation about Susan Vere and her marriage to James' teenaged favorite Philip Herbert: - on the "unlucky business" (separation circa 1610) and reconciliation slide where Bonner you assert they reconciled by 1616 "because" their first son was baptized 29 Aug 1617 but that is apparently incorrect just looking at the slides: - on the next slide, citing Lyson Vol 2, it actually says: 1. In latin: MARIA daughter of Philip Herbet count of Montgomery 👉🏽BURIED 12 July 1616.👈🏽 (Note: We dont know if this was a live birth or when conception occurred but note baby Maria has a name.) 2. In latin: JAMES Herbert son of Philip Herbert Earl of Montgomery 👉🏽BURIED 29 Aug 1617.👈🏽 (Sepulta! Not baptized but buried, Bonner. Again just relying on this document and not other records, we dont know when conceptoon occured or whether this baby was carried to full term or lost prematurely.) Second loss. Also, though not relevant to date of initial reconciliation after separation: 3. In English: my lord of Montgomery's young son [NN HERBERT] 👉🏽BURIED April 1618.👈🏽 (Note: this is their third lost baby in a row. NN = We dont know the name of this baby, or whether it was live born etc. Probably not since no name?) Third loss. 4. In latin: CHARLES Herbert, son of Philip Earl of Montgomery 🙏🏼baptized 19 Sep 1619.🎉 (This is the son who later married Mary BUCKINGHAM and then died shortly after.) First son to survive birth/infancy, heir apparent, but sadly he died without children during his father's life. 5. In latin: PHILIP Harbert son of "Mr. William Harbert" 👉🏽BURIED 25 Nov 1620.👈🏽 (Note this is apparently not their son so not relevant; it doesnt mention Montgomery and it's not Philip's son its somebody called William's son.) 6. In mix of latin and English: PHILIP Herbert son of Philip Earl of Montgomery 🙏🏼baptized🎉 21 Feb 1621 (NS). (Note: this is second surviving son, eventual heir, next Earl, who d. 1669; Susan's at-least 5th pregnancy, that we know about, and now she's delivered two living boys in a row and... interestingly right during peak FF prep window before going to press.) 7. In mix of latin and English: WILLIAM Herbert son to Rt Hon Philip Earl of Mountgomery, baptized🎉 28 May 1622. (Third son. Survived, but died unmarried.) 8. In mix: JAMES Herbert, son to Rt Hon Philip Earl or Montgomery, baptized🎉 12 Nov 1623. (Fourth son, survived, ancestor to Herberts of Oxfordshire circa Lyson.) 9. Laslty: Master John Herbert son of Philip Herbert Earle of Montgomery, baptized🎉 2 May 1625. Poor Susan. 😢 She lost a lot of babies early on and that after an already-difficult start to marriage with Philip who was probably an "ex favorite" with some behavioral health issues given his tendency to unprovoked violence and public assaults. Less favorited men would go to the Tower for that. Glad things turned around for her in the '20s with the surviving boys.

Let me help here. Marlowe was a mask for Francis and Anthony Bacon. You're welcome. Do not send any money.

To tired and I don't know what to say. Be back tomorrow ·

Thamk you Universoty of Michigan

The Six So called signatures of William Shakespeare kzbin.info/www/bejne/jqKcdJiIj9x3aNk

The 2011 movie anonymous is one of my favorite movies. I love this subject! Great video! Such a handful of possible other writers. I have my own channel where I talk about books

Just thinking about how much attention and possibly reputation some people achieve from peddaling the idea that Shakespeare didn't exist-copied other peoples works-was the name of a company. HA HA. some people just need to get a life or, maybe earn a reputation and living by actually producing something real.

WOW! that Dido speech you read is so beautiful. So Shake-speare.

Excellent. I've always found his plays very cold hearted; beautiful lines but ultimately no real genuine warmth.

This is stupid. There is no conspiracy, just facts. Up to each person to make up their own mind.

Intentionalism at its worst.

'Gender'? No thanks.

👍 Thumbs up !

Close but no cigar. John Florio had four dedications from Leicester's Men in his First Fruits published in 1578. John Florio is credited with bringing the Italian novel to English plays. No doubt he borrowed heavily from North. Later Robert Green would complain about an "upstart crow, pluming himself with the feathers of others", thought to be Shakespeare, makes perfect sense if John Florio is Shakespeare. In 1611 Queen Anne's New World of Words was published which introduced several thousand new words to the English language. Several hundred of these new words first appeared in the First Folio and nowhere else in any prior English publications. It would appear that the Great Magpie, John Florio, began a career of improving other peoples plays with Leicester's Men and continued to do so until he created a large enough English vocabulary with Queen Anne's New World of Words to write his Magnum Opus of revisionism, the First Folio. No one else in England had a large enough vocabulary to write a word salad like the First Folio in 1623. Obviously.

Just so well-researched. It would indeed be surprising if any work written in the late sixteenth century could possibly have been penned by anyone other than Edward de Vere, with the possible exception of the King James Bible, though even that was clearly based on an early draft by the Earl of Oxford.

Philip Sidney was yet another alias of the true bard from Nantwich, Cheshire and he (the bard) had a son called "John Miton". Watch my video, then go to my first video to get more background information on why I believe I am correct If you check Milton's s biography you will see that one of his wives, Elizabeth Minshull, was from Nantwich in Cheshire , and that his "best friend", Nathan Paget was also from Nantwich (son of Thomas Paget - theologian and his wife, Mary Goldsmith). I have written a book in which I explain that the bard himself was born in Nantwich, so Milton's associations would be perfectly natural if his father was born in the town! You have to disregard some of the dates of birth and dates of death death because the bard himself wrote many of the biographies with his own agenda and he resurrected his "dead" aliases, as their sons or nephews, sometimes with the same first name, sometimes not. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fmWuc51na9-mY8Usi=CNZfMTgA1IO7Iei2

I have some difficulties with this theory. During the webinar I posed the question: how would you reconcile Sidney's position on contemporary plays which railed against the mixing of high tragedy and low comedy and that they violated the Aristotlean unities with the content of the plays? "Shakespeare's" plays mix high tragedy and low comedy and do not follow those unities. It is counter to Sidney's position which occupies much of the content of his posthumous book An Apology for Poetry (1595) likely published by his sister Mary. Here is how Sidney puts it near the beginning of the book: “… all their Plays be neither right Tragedies nor right Comedies, mingling Kings and Clowns, not because the matter so carrieth it, but thrust in Clowns by head and shoulders, to play a part in majestical matters, with neither decency nor discretion, so as neither the admiration and commiseration, nor the right sportfulness, is by their mongrel Tragi-comedy obtained.” This does not fit the theory that Sidney was the playwright. His published poetry utterly unlike the sonnets, the long poems, or the contents of the plays. Compared to the writing of "Shakespeare" it seems juvenile or puerile in the words of Wednesday Addams as she described the play Gary wrote for the Camp Chippewa extravaganza. If you accept the Oxfordian theory, isn't it possible that de Vere was writing about himself in the third person (a rhetorical figure known as illeism) and that the word "fair" may have been a pun on is surname? That would clear up many enigmas about the identity of the "fair youth" who was de Vere addressing himself while he was either unmarried or estranged from his first wife Anne and unable to leave behind a male heir. At 35:06 Quattrocki Knight compares the Languet letter mentioning Sidney's ancestry as being 500 years old. By the time de Vere was active, his ancestry was also 500 years old. This also fits Sonnet 59. One last item: how did Languet manage to write sonnets which were so adaptable to elegant English and not leave a trace among his papers? Just a few items to think about.

This presentation suggests that the Sonnets were written before Henry Wriothesley was born. IT's a non-starter for that reason. Important question that this presentation does not address: What was the relationship of Shakespeare to Henry Wriothesley? Shakespeare dedicates his entire to career to Wriothesley in the dedication to Lucrece: "What I have done is yours; what I have to do is yours; being part in all I have, devoted yours." Just 6 years later, this same Henry Wriothesley was convicted of Treason for trying to overthrow the crown (and obviously to replace the Queen with someone who had a claim to the thrown). His conviction was reduced to Misprision of Treason, and he was released after Elizabeth died, and restored to all his former glory. Any theory of Shakespeare must address the relationship between Shakespeare and Wriothesley. What claim did Wriothesley have on the throne? Was Shakespeare signalling support for that claim in 1593 by dedicating poems to him? Shakespeare dedicated works to 3 different men. All three were engaged to daughters of Edward de Vere, but two of the marriages did not happen.

No, assholes, it was Wriosthley and Bacon wrote the stuff, and you know it. And you can expect at least three incarnations with schizophrenia if you are one of the people paid to lie about it.

This theory has to be a non-starter! Philip Sidney was long dead when the sonnets were written!

Shakespeare was very clear that everything he did is for Henry Wriothesley. "FAIR" would have been the pronunciation of VERE.

Apokalupsis Historia approves of this Sidney dissemination.

The TWO EYES in DA-SKIES are the SUN and MOON. The DARK EYE is the NIGHT EYE the ONE EYE on the MOON-EYE or MON-EYe. MON is ONE ... THUS A EYE on the MON EY is what??? Just that.. the ONE EYE on the MON EYe is simply A EYE written AI (Artificial Intelligence). As seen on the Movie MEN IN BLACK the haf to put the ARC-NET on the MOON to be the first INTERNET placed on the MOON that is forever called SATELLITE ONE *"SAT-A-LIGHT WON"*

"Stylometry" is a fancy word for "garbage in - garbage out"

Surely(so to speak!) the most open-minded and logical conclusion - until proven otherwise - is that a male and female group or 'Shakespeare Salon' of playwrights wrote but NOT co-wrote the plays, then submitted them to the group for read-throughs, finessing, minor or not-so-minor changes and suggestions - just as movie screen-writers do. And as always noone points out that (would-be) female playwrights had one other major reason to hide behind a male pseudonym in Elizabethan England because women were not permitted to write plays and have them publicly performed under their own names or using any female name for that matter! So I'll continue to broad-mindedly believe - until proven otherwise - that the likes of Mary Sidney, Amelia Bassano, Marlowe and Edward de Vere all contributed their own individual but "willfully"(!!) very "Shakespearean' plays to a Shakespeare Salon or collective - and a Mr. Will 'Spellcheck' Shak'spear from Stratford, real actors, closet actresses and others in the theatre business would also frequently attend the Shakespeare Salon's meet-ups. And much (very productive) fun would have been had by all. I can't wait for a now long-overdue movie sequel to "Anonymous" that reflects and both entertainingly and intelligently dramatises all of the above and much much more besides.. Paul G

Marlowe died. Early. Also- mathematically - word frequency and usage etc - proven that de Vere was almost exact match to “Shakespeare”.

It seems Florio deserves more study as likely author

Essex and Southampton were very likely brothers. Half brothers. Elizabeth probably had several children.