That's a possibility. And like I point out, in the 1970s playboy and Playgirl and a few softcore mags are found in places like Hospitals, barbershop, grocery stores, etc.

Thanks. We were not covering Telly life, we were talking about his ghost story that seemed to happened while he's having an affair and we believe he almost forgot about the affair and than he realized it and checked himself.

Thanks. Sellers used a southern accent in Lolita. I'm not sure if this was a true story or something they decided to tell people later. The huge question is why Dr. Strangelove a Nazi. I think this was commentary towards project Paperclip but aimed at non-rocket scientists. The CIA also took Nazis (camp doctors) for Operation Artichoke. Operation Artichoke is where LSD came from and I believe the name Mandrake is a play towards LSD. (The folklore of Mandrake is similar to LSD). I'll be doing a follow up video in the future that talks about Kubrick movies and Operation Artichoke and MK Ultra connection. Thanks. Hope you get to check out Lolita.

My impression too. But I think both time clocks are the same. The areas are different because we are seeing them from a delusional perspective.

Congratulations 420 sweet

Thanks

That's interesting... how would Earle Nelson fit? Kubricks movie is referencing Earle Nelson not HH Holmes. Both are in the book. I think Burke and Hare. Oddly Barbara Burke is the girl watching over Dolores Haze... Haze... Hare (lol) Maybe Haze is Hare?

@@tankardoftales4645 IDK. But the distance between Kubrick films and their source material seems to collapse into nodes of hyper-meaning.

@@Gershom. I think it's interesting. Like I said on the video I wasn't really sure until I realized Dr. Strangelove character is named Jack D Ripper. What's odd Jack the Ripper a English serial killer is named as an insane American General. I'm planning to explore Jack D Ripper in my next video.

@@Gershom. I do enjoy the numbers, thanks.

@@tankardoftales4645 It gets even weirder. Look into the actor who played him.

Picture Beavis and Butt-Head on a quest for sex and alcohol, and you might get the idea what Catcher in the Rye is all about.

I think Nabokov hated the popularity of Lolita and how people twisted the story. On the other hand I think Nabokov and Kubrick are like magicians - they would die a thousand times before they told the people that Lolita is inspired from serial killers - HHHolmes and Earle Nelson.

I would of left that video up, but I decided to add some clarification. Seriously I was thinking HH Holmes when I was reading the Foreword. And I'm supposed to believe Nabokov [who plays word games] happen to call Humbert "Humbert Humbert" to justify the use "HH" and he plots a plan to drug and rape a 12 year old, only to tell us that plan failed and Dolores seduced him the next day. And the boy that bonked her first is Charlie Holmes [some random name]... Yeah the fans are not happy.

Thanks. I think Kubrick is using a technique called Mere-exposure effect or familiarity principle which is common with advertising. You can see this in many of his films. The Shining seems to be loaded with reference to Psychological drama and horror. 3 Faces of Eve has many things connected to the Shining. Intresting find is 3 Faces of Eve shows signs that the movie is also being told by an unreliable narrator, especially with the doctors. My assumption is the director, Nunnally Johnson, might know something about the doctors he didn't want to tell publicly. I believe the real Eve wrote a book in the 1970s (after Sybil) and she told how the doctors took advantage of her. I dont have the book to verify my findings.

@@tankardoftales4645 I read a quote from Kubrick the other day where he said to Jack N. that every scene had already been filmed - and it was their job to do it better. I never heard that last bit before.

@@watermelonlalala that's interesting Jack Nicholson was an accomplishment graduate from the school of Roger Corman. Kubrick would be a walk in the park.

I believe Kubrick would enjoy the theory

Maybe Wendy hid it...

@hermanhale9258 I think my next video is about Charlie Holmes. I'm finally make this an official release 😊

Someone needs to point it out, and I took the initiative. Hopefully you'll enjoy the others.

@@tankardoftales4645 Yes, I enjoy your videos.

@@ThinkForYourself1972 thank you. I'm hoping to crack lolita in my next video with an Aluminium Baseball Bat. Lol

Thanks for the comment. I'm pinning it. >This movie was made over a decade before the first home videocassette recorder was offered to the public, it was made to be shown on a screen, where people's attention was focused on the dialog, not the paper. It's a prop. You think so? Lolita (1962): A middle-aged college professor becomes infatuated with a 14-year-old girl. The story is told from his perspective, blurring the lines between obsession and reality. (Story is told by an Unreliable Narrator) Sure the letter is a prop and there is no reason to have light bleed thru the pages, unless Stanley Kubrick wanted the audience to see that there was no writing on the pages. This prop was really intended to those that took the book Lolita and treat it like a Detective Horror Novel. You know the Serious readers that the Foreword was talking about. So if you didn't read the book as a Detective Horror Novel, then you would believe Charlotte wrote the letter and HH married her, she dies by getting hit by a car (but don't worry she was going to die anyway)... But if you read the book like a Detective - you'll noticed Humbert talks with lots of BS spewing from his lips. >As far as Stanley knew, people would see this movie once and then never again once it was gone from theaters, leaving virtually no one able to rewatch, pause and rewind to over examine every frame. Actually, your wrong. You don't need to freeze frame this scene. I'm only freezing framing the scenes because I don't want to get copyright strike. Also, I believe once I've pointed it out, you're not going to unsee the shadows and the lack of words on the pages. As for repeat ticket sales - are you kidding? As for rewatching scenes by frames (before home video recorders) - You do realize Psycho (1960) shower scene is analyzed frame by frame in film schools, because the editing is that damn good. >Too many Kubrick fans focus on these ridiculously minute details and extrapolate an entirely new plot based on the fact that many things on a movie set are fake, or not a perfect analog to the real world. I'm not sure what's the problem is. Did me showing you the letter has blank pages destroyed your viewing experience? Wait till I get to the band-aids - OMG you might loose it. Seriously, I'm open for these debates, I could go into details on how Stanley Kubrick and Nabokov pulled a fast one. I'm not sure if you read the book, that's why I posted the letter from the book. So, you can read it, and notice how this letter makes Kidnapping and Raping a child seemed less offensive. Why would Charlotte suggest this? Because - according to my Detective Hat and Pipe - She didn't write the letter. Humbert wants the reader THINK that Kidnapping and Raping Dolores was NOT HIS ORIGINAL INTENTIONS because the suggestion didn't come from him. But we know based on his actions this was his intentions. Thanks and I'm happy for your reply and I hope you'll follow it up.

Thanks :) Once you realized that Humbert is an Unreliable Narrator, the question is how can we tell the truth. This is tricky because Humbert tells the truth, but he twists it to make him sound less evil, pathetic. But he's manipulating the reader/audience with these emotions while boasting/bragging his evils. Think American Psycho, but instead the kills being imaginary, the rapes/kills are real. I believe David Lynch knows this that's why Lolita is his favorite Stanley Kubrick movie. Why most people believe the story is about a pathetic pedo and not realizing Humbert is a Serial Rapist and a Serial Killer... I guess Nabokov book perfectly manipulated most of the readers.

Wow... Hour long. I could watch this while putting the girls to sleep. I've found a Artichoke/MK-Ultra connection with most Stanley Kubrick movies from Dr Strangelove to EWS. Although I didn't see a connection with Lolita and Barry Lyndon. I might do that video next :) and maybe this "video" has something I didn't know with Lolita. I found 2 serial killer I believe were inspired Nabokov to write Lolita. I dont think Nabokov a pedo.

@@tankardoftales4645 Artichoke!!! I absolutely hate to go down this rabbit hole!!! Remember in Images when the husband comes home from shopping and he says he found an artichoke? The wife says: Artichoke? (like she can't believe it, or doesn't know what one is - hey, I just reminded myself of Scatman Crothers in The Shining) and then the husband says "I mean avocado." I hate to even look up Artichoke/MK-Ultra, because I already was thinking, is this woman in Images in a mind control sex cult, that's why she keeps waking up having sex with different men?

@@tankardoftales4645 I look forward to all your videos. I do think most of these famous icon authors and other celebs seem to be pedos or other sexual deviants. I do think almost every time a kid is on screen in a movie, weird pedo stuff is flashed to the audience, visual jokes, apparently for the amusement of the pedos.

Intresting video. I think Sally Horner kidnapping happened while he was writing his book, and inserted the reference because it was similar. Although, Professor Hamamoto seemed to believe her kidnapping story is fishy. I agree too, the kidnapping makes no sense, unless the parents secretly traffic their daughter. He's not adding anything to the to the information I collected. The butterfly collection was a real hobby. Yeah monarch is a butterfly/ as well as mind control. I think Nabokov was collecting butterflies before monarch (mind control). He's does acknowledge Nabokov denying Sally Horner. I've tracked 2 serial killers to the book. And it's possible more are in the book.

​@@hermanhale9258the problem I had with MK-Ultra is the information came out in 1973 (assuming Nixon middle finger to the CIA). So when Kubrick learned about MK-Ultra, he was working on Barry Lyndon... thats why The Shining, FMJ and EWS seemed to be connected to MK-ULTRA. Although, Dr. Strangelove, 2001 and Clockwork also seemed to be connected with MK-Ultra, too. But that would be impossible because Kubrick never had that information. But Artichoke is a precursor to MK-Ultra. And Artichoke was leaked in the 1950s. And sure enough MK-Ultra overlaps. The huge difference between Artichoke and MK-Ultra; Artichoke was experiment on soldiers and MK-Ultra was citizens and non-citizens [Insaine Asylum in Canada]. [And yeah similar to Overlook Hotel being an Asylum]

After I wrote this, I realized the plot of Murder, She Said either doesn't make a lot of sense or I don't remember the details of why the doctor has to make the police think one of the family murdered the girl. And I have watched that movie quite a few times, but it seems like a lousy plan.

>>I agree that the way he is holding the pages and the envelope, and the light shining on the pages, looks odd, and makes me look for some meaning in the pattern, but I am not a fan of "this never happened" explanations. This letter scene seemed to address those that read the book and has a good idea that the letter is fake. I've watched the movie 3 times before reading the book. While watching it I didn't think the letter was fake. But Humbert's laughter seemed evil to me because I know his intentions was to get closer to Dolores. But since I've identified the burnt toast scene early in the movie, my gut feeling is that Charlotte and Dolores are not aware of Humberts plans and he inserts them in his daydreams. I'm not 100% sure but I'm thinking all the scenes without band-aids are daydreams. (I'll explain this in another video) I agree the "this never happened explanations" can be difficult to understand unless you read the book and remember that the book is being told by an Unreliable Narrator. I also want to say the movie was made during the Hays Code (Stanley Kubrick was not the only filmmaker doing stuff to slip by the Hays Code censors). It's been years when I saw "Murder, she said" I have to get back into it one day. >>What's in it for Humbert to tell people there was a letter? To make him sound less of a monster. His plan was to murder Charlotte and kidnap and rape Dolores (I believe he also murdered her too). But he also wants to brag about his intentions. We know that Humbert doesn't like Charlotte. In the book, the letter reads: But if, after reading my "confession," you decided, in your dark romantic European way, that I am attractive enough for you to take advantage of my letter and make a pass at me, then you would be a criminal - worse than a kidnapper who rapes a child. So according to Humbert that he's so evil he takes advantage of his Landlady, but his evil actions of kidnapping and raping Dolores is not that evil. (It's very twisted) In the movie the letter don't get into that detail but if you read the book, you're very aware what's Humberts intentions are (we also have several scenes of Humbert eyeing on Dolores which tells us Humberts intentions)

They all do. Sometimes they are done this way on purpose because the writers of the story are afraid to inspire criminal actions and other times what seemed to make sense at the time becomes convoluted years later. I'll have to watch Murder, She Said. I do want to make a video on Manchurian Candidate from the 1960's (I've watched this movie 4 times and I have several questions), I also got a paperback printed before the release of the movie but I just don't feel like reading now.

@@tankardoftales4645 I read Lolita a couple of times, but probably in the seventies and eighties. Don't remember that much. I need to read it again. I thought Kubrick did not make Humbert creepy enough, and made Lolita too sophisticated, so the point was lost.

@@hermanhale9258 if you read the book again. Treat the Foreword as chapter 1a and chapter 1 as 1b. Keep in mind that Humbert enjoys fooling the experts (and mostlikely the expert writing the Foreword is fooled). Humbert is telling us the story. Charlotte and Dolores words is not their own words. Humbert also hints getting away with murdering Charlotte.

You see two different theories cross wires in my post - the theory that everything bad that happens in The Shining is from the plot of Jack's book, and I don't believe that theory, but the "pieces of the puzzle" idea supports that theory. Kubrick just threw every possible plot twist into the subliminals of the movie, and never gave us a final meaning for it all.

Love the long post. This might take me a few days to reply. We got done filming our new video (it's going to be on Lolita, focusing on Charlotte love letter to Humbert [both book and 1962 movie]) I think you'll enjoy this and I'm hoping it'll be done by Sunday.

@@tankardoftales4645 Looking forward to the new video! Good luck.

I believe the reason for so many theories is because the ending in the Shining.

I think Images was one of Stanley Kubrick favorite horror movies (although I have no proof about it, I see so much of the Shining in that movie). Hitchcock was another fine director but I don't recall him playing "mind f*ck" games. Although I believe, Frenzy was Hitchcocks best movie. It's everything like Psycho but with color, violence and sleeze. I think Psycho and the Birds are very good films. The only problem I have with North by Northwest was how the crop duster crashes (its kind of silly). The mental asylum Hitchcock movie I'll have to check out (do you remember the name).

That's funny. looks like everything in on the first floor. Which is odd. (If you catch my later videos, you might see where I'm going with this). I think there are radiators too. This happen to be one of the few rooms that has a radiator/air vent. Lolita is a very interesting movie/book. To be honest I wouldn't dreamed of reading Lolita. if you asked me 10 years ago I'll laughed at the thought. I watched the movie 3 times before reading the book. And because I've been so wrapped up in the Shining (Identifying the Continuity Differences - and understanding the story is visually telling us not to trust what's going on - unreliable narrator) Anyway, learning Lolita is also told by an Unreliable Narrator I had to read the book. I think what most people seemed to miss, they trust Humbert words, without asking the motive behind his words [Why does this book exist?] I have several theories and they start from the band-aids. Lolita (the book) is a horror story. Humbert twists the lies to make it sound like he's less of a monster. I'm pleased when some readers seemed to believe Humbert murdered Charlotte. I think he did. I don't believe he married Charlotte and Dolores was going to camp. I think Dolores was going to school. I don't think I'm the only one that gets it, but I do believe I see a darker book because I had connected the similarities of the book to two Serial Killers. Although, I believe Kubrick referenced Carl Tanzler but I don't see the reference in the book. I do believe somewhere in the movie Dolores was killed and Humbert is painting the nails of a dead body. If you get the chance to watch Lolita again, the scene after Dolores finds out her mother dies. And she is crying in the hotel room. listen to the sounds and don't look at the movie (I'm so surprised Kubrick pulled it off in 1962) Thanks for the comment sorry for a long reply. Although I feel like I should write more. :) if you like I could talk more. If you want to know more about the serial killers I'll tell you on a PM in Twitter.

LOL... Thanks for watching. Must be a crazy, he has band-aids on 3rd digit. Last week I spend a few days snap shot Humberts hands (with band-aids and without band-aids). I was using a better version of Lolita. I have over 250 pictures. I'll spend sometime circling them and maybe check and see if they are similar to my earlier findings.

Thanks. I originally though the posters was something Kubrick thru in to keep the movie an R-rating. I didn't leave out the Abbey Road connection, I didn't talk about it in that video because I was spotting the connection to the 27 club. I'm not sure if I talked about the Wish You Were Here connection in that video (sorry I don't remember). I do have plans in talking about abbey road but I feel so many people covered it. Unfortunately I did miss talking about the black doors. It was a few weeks later when I realized I miss them. If you look at the elevators you'll noticed a red panel (these red panels could refer to false doors [red doors]) and if you look at the black doors, the setup are very similar to the elevators except the middle is a black door. The Song Paint it Black, the first line is I see a red door and paint it black. Paint it Black is a Rolling Stones song and Brian Jones was a huge part of the creation of the song, he did the melodies before they wrote the lyrics. I made a video on Rumble which combined the opening credits of the Shining with In the Flesh? The opening song from the Wall. I made no changes to the song or credit sequence. You should check it out.

'clumps of hair' as Kubrick motions to the 3 strands she's holding was great comedic timing.

I've watched/read ton of Shelley Duvall interviews. She highly respected Kubrick. I think to the point that she changed from an actress to a movie producer/director/filmmaker. There an interesting 1998 interview she's plugging her new horror series and credited her experience in the Shining. I'm not sure as for the motive for making Kubrick a monster, it does make the conspiracies that he was assassinated for Eyes Wide Shut is a possibility.

I believe her hair was stuck in the window.

Sorry, see you mentioned that already...

15:20 -- has anyone figured out which page number the book is on? I'd be interested in seeing what's on that page.

Yeah, Shining Insights (another youtube channel talked about the page Catch in the Rye that Wendy was looking at. Sorry It's been years when I was on this subject and I don't have my notes on me. Just look up "Shining Insights" on youtube (I'll post the like but KZbin gets screwy with links. I hightly recommend watching all the videos. You'll enjoy them.

That's ok.

The problem with the David Chapman shooting is it happen many months after the release of the Shining. There is supposed to be a Oswald/Catcher in the Rye connection but I cannot find evidence that there was a connect or that anybody tried to connect Oswald and Catcher in the Rye before the Chapman shooting. I posted a video talking about the internet rumors on Oswald and Catcher in the Rye, but they seemed to reference each other. And I spent a good number of days looking at Texas Oswald archives, they have records of off the books Oswald owns - Catcher in the Rye was not on the list. Thanks for watching the video and commenting.

Some people believe he's going to an Asylum. Maybe from the abuse.

That's a very-very good observation. Thanks. I'm going to post you a link to my r*mble video. KZbin seemed to hide links. This is the Shining intro with the intro of In Flesh by Pink Floyd (no modifications was made). I cannot post the video on KZbin because of copyright issues.

Here the video. Please enjoy. rumble.com/v34qk58-the-shining-and-pink-floyds-the-wall-both-intro..html

@@tankardoftales4645 I notice Shelley Duvall's name matches up with "Space Cadet glow", and then The Shining comes up, also matching "glow".

It's odd how closely Harry Callahan to Henry Callahan. But the anagram wouldn't work with Harry.

Thanks. It was a fun video to make.

Lol. I didn't do any green screening yet. I need to buy one of those things. A few youtubers I like uses the green screen to interact with the movie. Although I think I need a better camera for that. The medieval tavern is a real thing. The house we bought had a finish basement. It had a bar, fireplace and a pool table. It was also boring looking. Lucky for us the walls were stucco white. So we painted the wood and add them to the wall. I bought a paint gun to spray the drop ceiling tiles. And while the tiles were drying I painted the drop ceiling support bars copper/brass (not sure). But the support bars were tricky because I had to hammer the paint brush (this took almost 2 weeks to do). The swords, my wife got them for me before we moved in. Most of the furniture were from the thrift stores. If you see the first video I was talking about man caves. I have before and after pictures of the basement. Might do an update video. As for the gnome. I see him as a fat guy, my wife likes him. She also likes Santa. 😀

@@tankardoftales4645 The fireplace is cool, though. I will look for the first video.

@@hermanhale9258 thanks. Our house has 3 fireplaces. 1 in the basement. 1 in the white front room and 1 behind me when I make videos by my nook.

@@hermanhale9258 my nook was a happy accident. I believe it was closet used for a sewing machine. I have made it into my computer setup and idea place to put my gaming stuff away. That I don't want to put in the basement.

@@tankardoftales4645 I went looking for your man cave videos, but could not find them, even with the exact titles. No matter how I worded the search. I did notice you had multiple fireplaces in the old videos I did watch. The one l really like has a place to store a lot of wood included. Perfect for when the power goes out in the winter.

Thanks 😊

Thanks. There is a strange MK-Ultra connection in the Shining.

Sexual abuse is creepy stuff. I believe Kubrick wanted a silent story of sexual abuse hinted in his story but he didn't want it to be the story. It's very dark stuff and evil. When I was introduced to the Wendy Theory I spent a lot of time looking at the apartment scene. If Wendy is crazy we would see it in this scene. And there is a lot of stuff happening. It makes me question the existence of the Doctor and Danny.

@@tankardoftales4645That is so mind bending. It's beyond "Images" in strangeness. You could have taught Altman some things. Ha-ha.

@@hermanhale9258 I've watching Manchurian Candidate 1962. Story is somewhat told by an unreliable narrator. I have a sneaky suspension that all the soldiers are sleeper agents and Angela Lansbury is not the guys mother. I did buy the book and had not got into it. Something about the tea garden scene dont make sense to my... I'll be working on the video sometime after Easter.

@@tankardoftales4645 I have seen that movie a couple of times, but I never paid enough attention to know exactly what was supposed to be going on. There are a couple of old mind control movies from that era, and none of them make sense to me. I never did find my copy of Dr. Strangelove. Are you still working on that one?

@@tankardoftales4645 Ha, I just read the wikipedia article for M.C. Very complicated plot. Not very believable. The interesting thing is that the movie and others like it taught Americans to think that this kind of assassin could be real.

Ok this is original. I've followed a few Paul McCartney is dead conspiracy theories and some suggest that Paul was replaced by Crowley son. I have not seen a connection of Crowley and Dr. Strangelove. I like it and if you have references please post them. Thanks.

Thanks I'll have to check it out.

That's interesting. If he did a 4th character that would make him an octopus. Sellers was a multi talented actor. I think his Mandrake character was referring to LSD (the folklore of Mandrake). And Dr. Strangelove implies a Nazi scientist working in America (Operating Paperclip). Although not every Nazi scientist working on rockets were saved by Operation Paperclip. Nazis scientists in concentration camps were also saved by Operation Paperclip and used in Project Artichoke (where the CIA started using LSD and where the idea of the Manchurian Candidate comes from) Makes me wonder if Jack D Ripper was a Manchurian Candidate or something similar.

@@tankardoftales4645 Well, as you probably know --- Kubrick wanted Sellers to play a 4th character in the movie, but Sellers balked and Slim Pickens was hired instead. I'm not so sure about Ripper being a MC. I think Ripper represented a throwback to a previous era, and he was fighting the future. As he said in the movie, war is too important to be left to the politicians. He was trying to take that power out of their hands at all costs. Historically, this has always been a source of friction between the military and the ruling class.

@@davegentry-pu9xm yeah there is something Kubrick is saying about the politics. I think Dr. Strangelove looks closer to FDR. Merkin Muffley looks like Pope Pius XII. Not sure about Mandrake. I'm not sure how Ripper fits with MC, or maybe he doesn't... I believe it was assumed the Jack the Ripper (serial killer) has syphilis and maybe Jack D Ripper had similar issues. But I do think the story is commenting on Operation Paperclip.

@@tankardoftales4645 Oh definitely. The character of Dr. Strangelove was opening a can of worms that, to this day, most people are either completely ignorant of, or, if they are --- they want those worms to stay securely in the can. Because if one understands what's in that can, all of 20th century history has to be rewritten. But we both know that only the "winners' get to write that. lol

The Canterville Ghost from 1944. Makes sense, interesting to check out.

@@tankardoftales4645 Oh, yeah, one more. At one point Robert Young and the child stand on the left side of the screen, and Young reaches out slowly and draws a curtain back. "Same gesture" as they say, that we see in the bathtub in The Shining. Same moment of suspense. Also, on the political level, when told that American soldiers are staying on the English property, the little girl mentions cowboys and Indians. The rich aunt says the aristocrats must make their guests feel welcome, the little girl asks, "How do you make Indians feel welcome?", showing she is "on the side" of the Indians. This is a theme with Wendy and her yellow jacket and I think Danny with his choice of darts in the game room (arrows).

@@tankardoftales4645 Here's another - because he is seeing and talking to ghosts, Robert Young says something about "I'm going out of my mind" and that he needs a keeper. Which sort of ties The Overlook experience all together, on one level.

@@hermanhale9258 it's was years when I saw Canterville Ghost. Did he died in the well?

@@tankardoftales4645 I just know what the wikipedia article said. Seems the ghost wanted to buried and stop being a ghost. The American soldier, played by Robert Young, did not die.

Lol... Does the War Room look odd? Large circler table with circler light fixture above. Huge map on screen. Rest of the room is undefined.

Makes me think of Shaft... 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 Who's the 'General Manager at the Overlook Hotel' that's a sex machine to all the chicks? (Ullman) You damn right Who is the man that wears leather pants on closing day? (Ullman) Can you dig it Who's the cat that shows up in the deleted scene to invite Danny and Wendy to stay with him? (Ullman) Right on They say this cat Ullman is a bad mother (Shut your mouth) I'm talkin' 'bout Ullman (Then we can dig it) He's a complicated man But no one understands him but his woman (Stuart Ullman)

I never fell asleep while watching the Shining even during the nothing scenes. But there is a MK Ultra connection to the Shining and a few other Kubrick films that nobody seemed to notice or talked about. I will be taking about that in a future video. Although there is a movie with strong hypnotic properties, and with the right mindset or being stoned - this movie could hypnotize you. The movie is called: Anguish (1987). And I saw happen to a few of my friends.

Yes. Movies are loaded with hypnotic and subliminal messages. All those people in the movie Room 237 were picking up real messages from the film - except the moon landing theory guy, I don't agree with him. I didn't agree with the Nazi Germany theory of The Shining when I first heard it, but a long time later I realized, yeah, I think that guy was right. Two things I noticed in The Shining - and nobody will agree with me - but once when Jack was talking to Lloyd, it looked or sounded like he said, "OK, I did have sex with him once." Meaning Danny. So then, I believed that theory about Danny. And when Jack is talking to Wendy on the stairs, one time it looked or sounded to me like he said, "Was it the Heil Hitlering?" LOL. Like he was asking her if she was threatening him with a bat because he was turning into a Nazi. Then, I believed the Nazi Germany theory. And there are more weird things I have picked up from The Shining. But I think it is funny what I picked up made me believe theories I did not believe when I heard them explained.

Thanks. Sorry I had a different microphone at the time. How the deleted ending confirms the Wendy Theory (or any theory that suggests Wendy is hallucinating). According to the script, Ullman said they searched the place and found nothing out of the ordinary. Assumptions are: No dead Hallorann, no chopped up doors, and no dead Jack... The scene suggests it was in Wendy imagination. As for Navarro part 2, yeah saw it, but my video was made many months before his video. I'm currently focused on the Overlook is an Asylum theory.

That being said I want to remind you that Halloran says to Durkin ad Denver airport: "The FAMILY that is supposed to rake care of the Overlook turned out to be totally unreliable a....... " Wendy says to Jack in Gold room: "There's a crazy woman (not ghost woman or something simillar) in room 237. I personally think that, in away, The Shiningplot consists of AT LEAST two plots. Maybe Wendy thinks her husband is a writer and they are in a hotel and when she finds out what he writes she is terrified not only because of his madness: she is terrified because of her own madness, because of Dany's madness and because something terrible happened before arriving to Overlook. And the green corridor is absolutely that of hospital. Wall clocks, colors, pipes... Stanley would have chosen other color if he did not want us to subconsciously think it is hospital. I think we shold pay more attention to clocks amd times throughout Overlook Hotel, they may help Miss M,. Tankard, Delta builder and us others on these channels to unlock the movie.

Thanks. I don't think the ghost are real because the abnormalities in the apartment (before the Torrances came to the Overlook). This will be a future video.

@@boxy1375 >>That being said I want to remind you that Halloran says to Durkin ad Denver airport: "The FAMILY that is supposed to rake care of the Overlook turned out to be totally unreliable a....... " Hallorann room is odd. There are 4 lamps in the room. Although the lamps and the naked posters sort of resemble the album cover Electric Ladyland recordmecca.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/IMG_8362.jpg >>Wendy says to Jack in Gold room: "There's a crazy woman (not ghost woman or something simillar) in room 237. Thats true, but it would be an odd line Wendy screams at Jack, "there's a ghost of a women and she attacked Danny." >>I personally think that, in away, The Shiningplot consists of AT LEAST two plots. LOL. I think there are several subplots and several red herrings. >>Maybe Wendy thinks her husband is a writer and they are in a hotel and when she finds out what he writes she is terrified not only because of his madness: she is terrified because of her own madness, because of Dany's madness and because something terrible happened before arriving to Overlook. Or maybe Jack we see is not the same Jack that Wendy is married to. That silly 1921 photo is the photo of Jack, but what if that image of Jack is what Wendy likes Jack to look like. >>And the green corridor is absolutely that of hospital. Wall clocks, colors, pipes... Stanley would have chosen other color if he did not want us to subconsciously think it is hospital. Thanks >>I think we shold pay more attention to clocks amd times throughout Overlook Hotel, they may help Miss M,. Tankard, Delta builder and us others on these channels to unlock the movie. Thanks. The clocks will be a future video.

I have just seen The Snake Pitt and I can say two things: 1. Its very good movie 2. After watching the mental hospital party scene, noticing INTERIOR of the ball room, noticing how patients are GATHERED, movement of camera towards them... I cannot help but have impression that Stanley was mirroring this scene and recreated in The 4th of July party scene. Maybe Jack was in 1921. caretaker of mental hospital that is portrayed as The Overlook hotel. Cheers

@@boxy1375 the ending of Snake Pit seemed like the ending group photo. My thoughts are similar to yours with Jack.

According to every chart I've looked at. And I found a color chart from the 1930s that I've posted in the video. Blue is compressed air and red is fire sprinkler. That's why I talked about the red pipe going to a fire sprinkler. The other pipes by the fire line are water and waste. The blue pipe is also on the otherside of the hallway. Sure this is a movie and you didn't have to think about the color or assuming the context of the pipes. If you dont want to think about that, maybe you should not check my other two videos: the time clock and Henry Callahan office. Because I dive deeper into the Overlook is an Asylum theory. :)

@@tankardoftales4645 What color were the water pipes on the old chart?

@@hermanhale9258 apple green - hot water, gray - cold water, black - waste. Usually the water pipes are closer to the waste pipes.

@@tankardoftales4645 thanks!

Thanks. In Lolita Peter Seller's used a country accent. This was when HH was forcing him to read the letter.

Peter Seller's broke his ankle during the bomb. Would that mean they done the bomb scene first or Slim Pickens had to replay all the scenes Seller's done. 🤔

Yeah George C. Scott was entertaining. The movie had funny moments, although I think the story is much more darker. I believe Kubrick was poking fun at project paperclip, and Manhattan Project. And poking fun of older men and lack of sex drive.

Thanks. I cannot picture Seller's doing Major Kong good :)

@@tankardoftales4645 maybe I heard that it was the Texas accent that drove him over the edge and led to his refusal...?

@@jonathansmith2323 Thanks. Seller's did spin a Texas accent (or country/cowboy) in Lolita.