DeGrasse Tyson is a scientist engineered by DEI. If he were white, he would be teaching middle school science in some random public school.

Bill Maher to appear in MAGA hat soon if he hasn’t yet

I seem to have missed the part where Tyson disputes the contention that it is a social construct.

So how did he get exposed? I tried watching the clip but you kept pausing it and telling me what to think.

In 2015 as part of my work, I went to a Tableau conference in Vegas at the MGM. This turd Neil proceeded to bash Ben Carson on stage. Obviously he got a ton of cheers, but it’s pretty wild how jerkoff liberals always take potshots at conservatives, even at completely non-political events

It was about time. He was a fake scientist who didn’t believe God exist. Never liked him.

Scientific American is a "popular" science magazine. They are not a peer reviewed journal publishing peer reviewed papers. They have had, in the past, some pretty big name contributors (Albert Einstein, for one), but at that time is was more of a "sciency" publication. It is billed as the "oldest magazine in the USA" but in fact it has gone through various owners, and various iterations. Since around the 1990s it has catered to a general audience that has an interest in science. Bringing this up to Neil DeGrasse Tyson just shows how dishonest Bill Maher is. Scientific American is not a measure of anything, nor are it's articles.

All this proves is they will always entrench themselves even deeper. This is a part of them now, and cannot be separated.

Bill Maher is the type needed to test all ideas. Seek what is true and what is false. Use unbiased critical thinking skills to look at asumptions.

OMG! NDT still had credibility? I thought he blew through the last of it during Covid! He was spending it like a drunken sailor on shore leave.

I don't like these people that try to shw a segment but then interupt it so often that it just becomes disjointed. Perhaps I'm just too old to keep up

MSNBC... is cooked, broken up and being fed to the dogs.

He just did not want to express his opinion and he had not scientific paper available about reasons why someone lost elections. so there was nothing to say´about it.

Really misrepresents Neil Tyson at the end. Neils point is that one editor, who got fired for her comments, got possessed by an out there ideology and made comments that were not scientific. Neil never defended that there weren’t biological differences that affected sports performance in many if not most sports. How is everyone buying this ragebait nonsense

FJB and Kamala raised their taxes, gas prices, grocery prices etc:

We need Destiny to go on Bill Maher! AT LEAST Destiny can engage with ideas and provide logical arguments while also being able to joke around, and while he is very much on the left, he fights with the unhinged progressives all the time so Bill and him are gonna have a lot to talk about

It´s a cult.

Both you and NGT thought that Bill meant the chick who got fired said the Sports bias thing. Bill was just saying it was in the magazine, happened on her watch, yes, but she didn't write it

Liable is not criminal judgment. It is monetary judgment.

When one of the "spokesman" of science is ignoring reason or lying because of his political views, people should stop listening to them...forever!

You know what Carl Sagan NEVER did? Told me I was stupid for my morals and spiritual beliefs. He would give me reasoning for why he doesn't agree with me, and why he formed his opinion. He would never attack anybody over something so insignificant. That's the biggest lesson I think Neil never learned.

Him, Robert Dinero and other famous people who we thought were geniuses until they opened their mouths about politics and we found out they were just average stupid.

Neil is a joke.

Asnongold converging with secret scholar. What a time to be alive

I never really liked Tyson. I first saw him interacting with Lawrence Krauss, who I DO respect, and he always seemed disrespectful to him.

Just listening and not watching, i thought I was listening to moist critikal

Oh boy...

you talk too fkn much!!

I believe Neil actually looks at the bigger picture, as a proper scientist would do. He doesn't get into the right wing left wing social media crap. Most males cannot be "beaten" in sports by most females, but it's not an absolute. He, of course, disagrees that males and females are just a social construct, but Neils doesn't play the political game, even if people want him to. I feel your analysis is biased on the idea that he should. To balance things out: I've seen Neil publicly going against the idea of race, saying that multiple races within humans does not exist, and people should stop playing the "race card". He stated that he rejects every invitation to talk at "black history month" events. He also stated that if he would go talk at such events, it would promote the idea that there is such a thing as black humans and white humans. I don't agree 100% with anyone, including Neil, but I feel a lot of people who are criticizing Neil recently, are wanting him to be on their political side, and if he's not simply and obviously on their side, then he's an idiot. Just as a politically trapped mind would think.

Good video. The teacher in question needs to be let go. Too emotional, isn’t responsible and respectful towards others. Goodbye!!! Hazard to children.

I've been saying this for years, but I have no platform

So women could be better than men at long distance swimming. If that’s true, surely there’s still a reason why men and women are split in sports, just in this case it’s that men can’t compete against the women.

I respected Tyson standing up for reality in the past, but disrespect his attack on reality today. I guess it evens out.

I will never understand why Tyson has been painted as so academically advanced compared to SO MANY others. My brother is a quantum physicist and he warned me about Tyson’s behavior and reputation in the academic world. It isn’t good.

The worst NBA team beats teh best WNBA team 100 out of 100 times. For a WNBA team to beat any NBA team ever would be so improbable as to raise suspicion at the result.

Honestly... I wouldn't be surprised if a WNBA team was held scoreless by an NBA team. If both are playing all-out for the entire duration, that is.

Everyone loves Neil when he spews nonsense about space but reviles him when he spews nonsense about gender.

lol Asmon, "Wait, wut?"

His appearance on the trigonometry podcast was terrible as well

I don't even care if he's become less credible of a scientist because of how much more of a celebrity he has become... the bare minimum he could do as a celebrity scientist is inspire his audience, which he fails miserably at when he can't stand the idea of going to Mars.

im not getting it. What on earth do Niel Tyson have to do with an article in Sceince of America ?(or whatever the published material is named)

he is the communication major of science

What was the reason the school gave?

I don't believe for a second that a Trump voter couldn't name a single policy. Everyone can name the wall.

Neil definitely is not a fake scientist. He was a genuine scientist, but now has become an activist.

Neil Degrasse Tyson.... more like Neil Dunning-Kruger 😂.

The best of the WNBA couldn't beat the best high school boys 1 out of 100 times.

Maher is just blowing with the wind imo. Sometimes he makes a good point, more now than last few years since the sentiment has changed. His true arrogance comes out in his drunken stoned podcast where he interviews himself basically. His PBD "interview" comes to mind

Neil has never been fit to carry Carl’s shoes…

NDT exposed himself months ago. He's said self identification is the benchmark for decision making and asked why should anyone care how you identify in the moment. A scientist disparaging those who care about reality while at the same time being outraged at flat earth nutters? Those types are called charlatans. His beliefs and ethics are entirely situational which makes him dishonest. There are highschool boys teams right now who could beat the greatest women's basketball team that ever existed. And that's just a fact. Different but equal is nnot a hard concept to grasp people.