12 сағат бұрын
19 сағат бұрын
28 күн бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
6 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@glendanikolakakos7431 10 сағат бұрын
What a wonderful testimony, welcome back to the family
@bevmchugh5903 13 сағат бұрын
That was beautiful 🙏
@robinconnelly6079 15 сағат бұрын
Only listened to the beginning. Another Catholic apologist turning things upside down. I was really hoping for a good discussion but your opening statement is really saying something like: "Because you don't agree with me, you are being divisive. Therefore you are bad." When Jesus said "this is my body", is it POSSIBLE that it was an allegory? Think about that for a moment. Don't just dismiss it in your mind. If you read the scriptures relevant to that verse, it is very reasonable to see it as an allegory. OK, you take it literally but I most certainly don't. There are a lot of types and shadows about bread and food and the word and so on surrounding that passage. They clearly show me that it is an allegory. If I was to bend to your belief system and see it as literal I would be going against my own conscience. So why do you make me bad for having a different understanding to you? I don't see you as bad. I think you are wrong and somewhat brainwashed by Catholic thought but I don't think you are bad. I'm not calling you "divisive". I respect your convictions and I have no reason to fight with you. How about doing the same for the Protestants? Some things in scripture are not entirely clear. And that's OK. Why not accept that instead of bashing the protestants? Bury the hatchet. There are some things that we will never understand in this lifetime. Disunity comes when we choose 1 side of the fence over something that is not clear and throw rocks at the guy on the other side. You can keep on shooting or you can say "OK, the issue is unclear". I can do that and we can shake hands and be brothers. That is what unity is all about.
@EBeautiful-f9d 14 сағат бұрын
@@robinconnelly6079 Amen Robin! You’re so Right!
@midairfortress-revert 12 сағат бұрын
If you feel justified in disagreeing with the first 1500 years of Christian teaching on the Eucharist, then have at it. But had you voiced this doctrine of yours in the early days of the Church, you would have been exposed as a schismatic at best, heretic at worst.
@alhilford2345 11 сағат бұрын
@robin...: It would appear that you view the words, "...this is my body...my blood..." as symbolic only. What evidence is there that Christians of the first or second centuries would agree with you? How about the fifth century? The tenth, twelfth? Is it POSSIBLE that every Christian accepted Our Lord's words at face value? Do you have any evidence that they did not? Would the Holy Ghost allow Christians to be misled (lied to) for fifteen hundred years before the Protestant 'reformers' finally saw the 'truth'? If this literal interpretation of the Sacred Scripture was not acceptable to all Christians, then there must be documentation somewhere to that effect. Somebody must have written, taught, preached this during those fifteen hundred years. But where ? I'll go along with Flannery O'Connor, who said, "If it's just symbolic then to hell with it!"
@EBeautiful-f9d 10 сағат бұрын
@alhilford2345 because the whole gospel of John talks about be believing in Jesus Christ for salvation over 90 times every other verse talks about believe in over and over and over Jesus Christ for salvation!
@EBeautiful-f9d 9 сағат бұрын
@midairfortess-revert opinions Very!
@RyanTimbal-u8v 16 сағат бұрын
Luke 13:30
@marknovetske4738 18 сағат бұрын
Thank you for your work in bringing truth to a world of confusion.
@TheMOV13 21 сағат бұрын
Metropolitan Kallistos Ware of blessed memory, used a handy little catchphrase: "ALL are priests, SOME are priests, and ONE is priest" i.e. ALL baptised Christians fulfil a priestly function in the world, e.g standing before God in intercessory prayer for family, friends, church, community and world etc.... SOME Christians are called out from among the ALL to serve in the church, administering the Sacred Mysteries, and ONE is priest, i.e. Jesus Christ, our Great High Priest, from whom all other forms of priesthood receive their efficacy and validity.
@TheMOV13 22 сағат бұрын
Excellent presentation.
@squizza28 22 сағат бұрын
The RC church says others have deviated from the original doctrine, but I understand that transubstantiation was only affirmed as a doctrine in the council of trent, in 1215. So I don't know how they can say that.
@richardounjian9270 21 сағат бұрын
Because the Church is reactionary. Look at the Councils. Most are reactionary to herecies that became evident.
@cruznature7545 18 сағат бұрын
It was designated as transubstantiation the ritual of consecration has always been performed. The Orthodox call communion a mystery.
@fantasia55 12 сағат бұрын
@richardounjian9270 the Nicean Creed, for example, is basically a reputation of various heresies.
@midairfortress-revert 12 сағат бұрын
I think what you mean to say is that at the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, for the first time the Church dogmatically used the term "transubstantiation" as the correct term to describe the conversion of the bread and wine to the Body and Blood of Christ. But there is a consistent and persistent witness in the Church Fathers right through the medieval age of a conviction that the bread/wine became the Body/Blood by the power of the Holy Spirit through the prayers of consecration. Think of it like this: At the Council of Nicea in 325, the Church for the first time dogmatically defined Jesus as "consubstantial" with the Father. But the Church did not invent that belief in 325 - the conviction is centuries older. But when the need arose to carefully and dogmatically define what we believe to be the true nature of Christ, the Church used that term. That is the same thing that happens in nearly every ecumenical council, including Lateran IV in 1215. I hope that helps.
@JohnMcKay-p1f 23 сағат бұрын
Bible believing Protestant Saved people cannot be united with the RC church.
@fantasia55 12 сағат бұрын
the Bible is a Catholic tradition
@draconian8994 Күн бұрын
These are overlaboured issues which would forever be subjects to various interpretations. Since nobody adjudicates it , it should be left alone. What matters is the spirit of the follower of Christ and not the ceremonies and rituals.
@midairfortress-revert 12 сағат бұрын
Tell that to Jesus and Paul?
@iggyantioch Күн бұрын
Gen. 14:18 - this is the first time that the word “priest” is used in Old Testament. Melchizedek is both a priest and a king and he offers a bread and wine sacrifice to God. Psalm 76:2 - Melchizedek is the king of Salem. Salem is the future Jeru-salem where Jesus, the eternal priest and king, established his new Kingdom and the Eucharistic sacrifice which He offered under the appearance of bread and wine.
@FiatVoluntasTuaAmen Күн бұрын
It is only the most divisive doctrine since the late middles ages. For the majority of Church History this has been universally taught and accepted. In fact, it is what distinguished Christians from non-Christians for 1,500 years since the time of Christ's Glorious Ascension into Heaven
@BensWorkshop Күн бұрын
Their was a universal priesthood of the Israelites in the Old Testament (In Exodus 19:6). I wonder if Luther had read that. Good work.
@_ready__ 23 сағат бұрын
Is there still a priesthood
@BensWorkshop 22 сағат бұрын
@@_ready__ Yes. Google it, you will find articles on it.
@alisterrebelo9013 Күн бұрын
My highly subjective view is that Protestants and Evangelicals get even more worked up by Blessed Mary, her intercession, her Queenship and her being the Mother of the Divine Word God who incarnated into flesh.
@midairfortress-revert 12 сағат бұрын
emotionally, maybe. But there was never a time in Christian history when there were 200 Protestant views of the BVM, as there were 200 Protestant views of the words "This is My Body" after one generation of reformers.
@kylie3232 Күн бұрын
Excellent video 😊
@jielah Күн бұрын
God bless your work! We appreciate your knowledge and reminding us of the richness of the Catholic faith.
@arthursabarre2897 Күн бұрын
Amen 🙏🙏🙏
@ednewcomer Күн бұрын
Bread starts from many little grains of wheat. Wine starts from many little grapes. Both are a metaphor of how individuals become united to form the mystical body of Christ via the Holy Eucharist.
@EBeautiful-f9d Күн бұрын
All of you are obsessed with Transubstantiation. When all the Gospel according to John is just saying to Believe in Jesus Christ for salvation! In many metaphorical and non-metaphorical ways. Over 90 times this Gospel says! We are saved by Grace Alone, Through Faith Alone, in the Finished work of Christ Alone, For the Glory of God Alone! God does not Require Our works to Save Us!❤️✝️
@NuLeif Күн бұрын
When Martin Luther translated the letter to the Romans into German in the sixteenth century, he ADDED the word ALONE -but alone is not in the original Greek text. Romans 3:28 [Justified faith alone] “It has resulted in a self-centered and subjective individualism, divorced from all ideas of the Church incorporating us as members of the mystical body of Christ. People have tended to regard the whole of religion as consisting in their own interior and personal state of religious feeling.” - Fr. L. Rumble
@EBeautiful-f9d Күн бұрын
@NuLeif We are Justified by the works Of Jesus Christ to satisfy Father. Nothing was Added. The Father required the perfect works of Jesus Christ to Satisfy His Wrath. You don’t SatisfyI don’t Satisfy His Wrath with our incomplete works. God doesn’t need or want our works to save us! What are God’s Requirements of His Law for Humanity?
@NuLeif Күн бұрын
@@EBeautiful-f9dDo you accept the historical fact that Luther added the word “alone”? ALONE is not in the original Greek text. The phrase “faith alone” does occur in the New Testament: one time, in James 2:24. There the inspired apostle denies that justification is from faith alone. Let me quote it: “You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.”
@NuLeif Күн бұрын
@@EBeautiful-f9d Do you believe the historical fact that Luther added the word ALONE? alone is not in the original Greek text. The phrase “faith alone” does occur in the New Testament: one time, in James 2:24. There the inspired apostle denies that justification is from faith alone. Let me quote it: “You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.”
@EBeautiful-f9d Күн бұрын
@NuLeif James Chapter 2 Speaks about the Profitability a Believer’s Faith! “What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works. Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble. But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead? Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar? Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect? And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God. Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. Likewise also was not Rahab the harlot justified by works, when she had received the messengers, and had sent them out another way? For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.” James 2:14-26 KJV This speaks of the Profitability of our Faith not the Justification of our Faith!
@rukidding-y2c Күн бұрын
This need not be. Protestants see this as a little play called the last supper. I know many who have seen the truth, they are ready to change. They just won't take that next step. Why?
@randycarson9812 Күн бұрын
The loss of friends and family relationships is too great a price to pay.
@HAL9000-su1mz Күн бұрын
Pride. Ego. A comfortable life, like atheists have.
@po18guy-s4s Күн бұрын
The "reform" was far from the first assault on the Holy Eucharist. 500 years earlier, the divisive spirit which incited Berengarius of Tours to deny the Eucharist and demand bible alone was simply recycled in Luther. Berengarius reluctantly repented just before death. Luther's ego would not allow him to repent. Luther diluted the Eucharist, while Zwingli dissolved it completely and Calvin decided to split the difference. 1 John 4:3. Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition And every spirit that dissolveth Jesus, is not of God: and this is Antichrist, of whom you have heard that he cometh, and he is now already in the world.
@T.Truthtella-n3i Күн бұрын
Protestantism is definitely a forerunner of Antichrist.
@jorgegomes83 21 сағат бұрын
The "reform" was just a looting operation of church property. There was no theological basis for the schism. (These are not my words. They are from dr. EMJ)
@hailholyqueen Күн бұрын
Man, that is some rich well-presented content!
@smeatonlighthouse4384 Күн бұрын
At last someone is listening to what I have been saying for a long time. We come from the one loaf, Christ, on the grounds of His dying on the cross for us. When we break the loaf and share, we are proclaiming Christ's death as the means of us being part of the Body of Christ. He is the Head of the Body in Heaven, and we are members of that Body here on earth. The feast is a remembrance of the one who died, the Lord Jesus Christ, and a testimony or proclamation that we love Him and belong to Him. There are many assemblies of believers who remember Christ on the Lord's day, but only one Church, no matter where you are. The Roman Catholic church is NOT that church, and no individual 'church' is.
@HAL9000-su1mz Күн бұрын
⭐⭐⭐Ladies and gentlemen, if this is not the "other gospel" Paul warned us of, I DO NOT KNOW WHAT IS.
@BensWorkshop Күн бұрын
@@HAL9000-su1mz Paul could have said "Some follow Luther, some Calvin"
@HAL9000-su1mz Күн бұрын
We will be delighted when you finally listen to something the Church has been saying for 2,000 years. And the silence it will produce, which denotes LEARNING.
@smeatonlighthouse4384 Күн бұрын
@@HAL9000-su1mz I see your mind is still in darkness. You haven't got a clue about what I am talking about. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with the gospel. The true 'church' which Christ is building is a spiritual, invisible Body here on earth, composed of 'living stones' who join together to form a habitation of God by the Spirit. The Breaking of the Bread and drinking of the wine is a feast of remembrance and love by those who are joined to Him by the Spirit. It is not to bring a person to Him, but an outward showing that we already are the children of God and the 'Body' of Christ, and it is only until He comes to take us to Heaven. The Lord's death is our victory proclamation and our bond.
@smeatonlighthouse4384 Күн бұрын
@@BensWorkshop No he could not, they were not born then.
@NuLeif Күн бұрын
CCC1331: “By this sacrament,” the Catechism says, “we unite ourselves to Christ, who makes us sharers in his body and blood to form a single body”.
@_ready__ 23 сағат бұрын
Catechism says
@squizza28 22 сағат бұрын
It's not a sacrifice though.
@garymanz3403 13 сағат бұрын
@@squizza28what is it if not a sacrifice?
@jorgegomes83 Күн бұрын
We as catholics believe that God created us in order for Him to comunicate His Love and to be loved and glorified outside of Himself. This may be a fancy way to say that He created us for Himself. In His divine will to comunicate His love, what could be definitive way of doing so? Well, it would be by giving Himself to us, knowing that He is Charity Itself. This reality begins here on this life, by the very Sacrament he instituted: the Holy Eucharist. By material signs of a consecrated bread and wine, of eating and drinking it, we take part in a reality that will last for all eternity in Heaven: to be void of ourselves all else and to be filled with the Most High. To expect the eternal life to be like an eternal picnic in the woods among snakes and lions is to miss the point completely.
@squizza28 22 сағат бұрын
Well if you go by RC teachings, if you're particularly good the pope will beautify you to sainthood and usually spend the time between then and the red of the world passing the prayers of those on earth to God. You will be kept very busy, day and night.
@karachie2008 Күн бұрын
John 6:66 tells the reaction of those who have insufficient faith. All the early Christian’s believed in the ‘body of Christ’.
@NuLeif Күн бұрын
That’s one of the main verses that tipped the scales in making my decision to convert.
@richardounjian9270 21 сағат бұрын
Notice the presence of "666"!
@NuLeif 19 сағат бұрын
@@richardounjian9270 The books of the Bible did not originally have chapter and verse notations. Remove all chapter and verse numbers, and that is essentially what the original books of the Bible looked like. They were merely paragraph after paragraph. It wasn’t until around the thirteenth century that chapter divisions were universally added by scribes and not until the sixteenth century that the individual verses were numbered. “Given that chapter and verses in the Bible are a relatively modern and entirely human development, I would not recommend reading anything symbolic or meaningful into chapter and verse numbers.” - Fr. Charles Grondin
@richardounjian9270 19 сағат бұрын
@NuLeif The very fact that it wasn't planned for 666 to appear makes it all the more significant in my mind. The Godhead knew how it would be once chapter and verse was applied. Satan is thrilled when someone rejects Christ in the Eucharist.
@NuLeif 19 сағат бұрын
@ I believe the Eucharist is the Source & Summit of my Faith. I don’t need to add on numerical speculation/sensationalism.
@PeterMcKeever-g3j Күн бұрын
By not having communion you forsake eternal life.
@mando9362 Күн бұрын
Let us pray for our separated brethren
@TheMOV13 Күн бұрын
EO Christian here. always grateful for prayers!
@_ready__ 23 сағат бұрын
Who is the separated
@TheMOV13 21 сағат бұрын
@@_ready__ Until about 1054 ad, there was only really one Christian church, globally. Then, in 1054, tragically, the great split occurred between the church in the west and the church in the east, so we now had what we now call the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox church. Then, a further disastrous split occurred about 500 years later in the protestant reformation, leading to a great many new Christian denominations. We are now separated, tragically, but nonetheless "brethren" hence "separated brethren"
@EasternChristian1988 15 сағат бұрын
@@TheMOV13 The great schism was largely the fault of the Roman Church. It would be nice to see Rome more open to making concessions in trying to put things right since her "developments of doctrine" largely led to the estrangement and differing theologies. The Orthodox, by and large, maintain the faith of the Apostles with very little alteration. Conversely, Roman Catholicism today is entirely alien to Roman Catholicism 100 years ago and both are completely alien to Roman Catholicism 1000 years ago. This is a very serious problem that has yet to be addressed. I say this as a Ruthenian Greek Catholic who remains in the Catholic communion of Churches.
@_ready__ 12 сағат бұрын
@ OK how do you attain salvation?
@halleylujah247 Күн бұрын
You did a wonderful job presenting this information.
@Fruit-Inspector 2 күн бұрын
📜 Hebrews 7:3Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest forever. 📜 Hebrews 4:14Therefore, since we have a great high priest who has ascended into heaven, f Jesus the Son of God, let us hold firmly to the faith we profess. 📜 Jeremiah 8:7 But my people do not know the requirements of the Lord! 8“ ‘How can you say, “We are wise, for we have the law of the Lord,” when actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely? 📜 Jeremiah 7:14 Therefore, what I did to Shiloh I will now do to the house that bears my Name, the temple you trust in, the place I gave to you and your ancestors. 15 I will thrust you from my presence, just as I did all your fellow Israelites, the people of Ephraim.’ 16“So do not pray for this people nor offer any plea or petition for them; do not plead with me, for I will not listen to you. 17Do you not see what they are doing in the towns of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? 18The children gather wood, the fathers light the fire, and the women knead the dough and make cakes to offer to the Queen of Heaven. They pour out drink offerings to other gods to arouse my anger. 19But am I the one they are provoking? declares the Lord. Are they not rather harming themselves, to their own shame?
@marycharminlunalambo4103 2 күн бұрын
Strong Protestants become Catholics, weak Catholics become Protestants
@solafide9533 3 күн бұрын
*Everyone can see Roman religion is a false religion. Only RCs could not. 95% of RC doctrines and 95% of RC clergies did not come from God's Word. Why would a true religion have such statistics?* 1. Catholics say Mary was forever virgin. Yet Bible says Jesus had brothers and sisters. Mary was not perpetually virgin. Mk 6:3, Mat 13:55, Mat 27:56, Mar 6:3, Mar 15:40, Mar 15:47. 2. Catholics say clergies must be celibate. Yet BIBLE says Peter (supposed R Church first leader) had mother in law. Bible says celibacy is not a qualification for clergies. Mat 8:14-15, Mar 1:30-31, Luk 4:38-39. 3. Catholics say Mary was sinless. But Bible says Mary offered a sinner's offering. She was a sinner. Bible says Mary needed a Saviour. Lk 2:23-24, Lev 12:6-8, Rom 3:10. 4. Catholics say confess to R priests in a box. BIBLE says nothing about confessing to priests in a box. Bible says confess to God only. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6, Romans 10:9-10. 5. Catholics say drink of the physical blood of Jesus. Yet OT and NT both say do not drink blood. Acts 15, Lev 7:26. 6. Catholics say pray to passed on Mary and "saints". Yet Bible says do not contact the dead. NT Church did not record a single case of NT believers asking passed on saints to pray for them. Deut 18:11, Isaiah 8:19. 7. Catholics make and bow down to statues. Bible says do not bow down to graven images (statues). Deut 4, Exo 20:4-5. 8. Catholics sprinkles “holy water”. But NT Church of the Bible mentioned nothing about “holy water”. There was no record of any Apostles sprinkling “holy water” on believers. Catholics claimed “holy water” came from OT. Yet Num 5:17 says “holy water” was water used to test adulterous women in OT temple. Hardly the same. Those were for Old Covenant Jews. Not New Testament Christians. 9. Catholics say Peter was pope - bishop of all bishops. Yet Bible says Peter was just a leader of the Jerusalem Church. Bible says nothing of the office of bishop of bishops. Gal 2:9, Mat 16:18. 10. Catholics say there is a seat of Peter. Yet BIBLE says nothing about it. Jesus said “not to lord over others”. 11. Catholics has clergy priesthood. Bible says clergy priesthood was done away with in New Testament. There is no clergy priesthood in NT. Heb 7:27, 9:12, 10:10. 12. Catholics preaches Works Salvation (faith + good works + partake R sacraments + submit to R pontiff + be in R Church + devote to Mary = to be saved). Yet Bible says “believe in Jesus to be saved”. Bible says Works Salvation is cursed. Gal 1:8-9. Acts 16:30-31, John 3:16, Romans 10:9-10. 13. Catholics says they must do Penance to atone for their sins. Yet Bible says repent, confess and sins will be forgiven. Catholic Bible changes the word “repentance” in NT into “penance”. Original Greek NT does not use or mean the word penance. Penance = work to atone for sins. Repentance = change of heart. 1 John 1:9, Mat 6. 14. Catholics say Mary went straight to heaven without dying. Yet Bible says nothing about it. 15. Catholics say Islam and Christianity have the same God. Yet Islam doesn't believe in death and resurrection of Jesus and Trinity.
@michaelbledsoe4355 3 күн бұрын
Catholicism is another Works based religion like Islam, Buddhism or Mormonism. The only difference is that catholics worship Mary and the saints.
@richardcastro1276 3 күн бұрын
So you have a somewhat truth and then a complete lie. God has sent proof of the righteousness of the Catholic Church. I will point to 3: 1) during WW2, a group of German Catholic priests survived the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. The lived 8 blocks from the drop zone. They SURVIVED an atomic bomb. They did not even get radiation poisoning and died of old age. Explain this. 2) Incorruptible bodies (organic) of several saints over centuries. Including recent Pope St. John Paul II, the first African-American nun St. Wilhemina Lancaster and St. Padre Pio. Their bodies do not decompose - natuarally. They prayed to Mary all throughout their lives - they did not worship Mary or the saints. There is physical proof here on earth of their sainthood. Explain this. 3) The tilma of the Virgin Mary, from OL of Guafalupe, that material disintegrates within a couple of decades, here it still stands nearly 500 years later. Their are other miraculous details... like the picture having the temperature of the human body. 9-10 million Aztecs were converted to Catholicism. The Trinity made Mary Queen of Heaven. But we do not worship her or the saints. You are bearing false witness on Catholics and judging us. Matt 7 :1-5; Luke 6 :37 and James 4: 11-12 Explain this. All Protestant leaders from the "Reformation" were not prophets. NONE of them had any miracles or signs they were prophets from God. These were all ex-Catholics that were ex-communicated. Martin Luther had made vows to God which he broke, he married a nun that also broke her vows. Following Protestantism is mostly following disobedience. Now there could be innocent people that did their very best to follow Christ and God will know their hearts... but there will be very,very few. However, pretty soon God will give an opportunity to repent - it is called The Warning or the Illumination of Conscience. Many, many, many Protestants will realize that the Catholic Church was the true Church all along and will rejoin us. There will be some that will not convert, but hopefully most will. This is soon to happen. See Garabandal or the Illumination of Conscience. This will be the greatest miracle seen on earth ever. Time will stand still. All humans above the age of 7 will go through this event.
@HAL9000-su1mz 2 күн бұрын
TROLL. Reported for harassment.
@hassanmirza2392 3 күн бұрын
Historic Jesus never claimed to be divine. He was a human prophet.
@HAL9000-su1mz 2 күн бұрын
Stop trolling. Harassment reported.
@hassanmirza2392 2 күн бұрын
@HAL9000-su1mz Lol 😂
@halleylujah247 3 күн бұрын
Thank you for covering this. I appreciated your commentary.
@halleylujah247 3 күн бұрын
I appreciate how thorough you were in your explanation.
@williampalomino4949 3 күн бұрын
Incredible video. Thank you for posting this
@BrockSamson18 3 күн бұрын
Dude, your Pope just openly allowed gay men to become priests. Rome isn't far behind and your kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
@HAL9000-su1mz 2 күн бұрын
False. Stop trolling. Harassment reported.
@StringofPearls55 4 күн бұрын
The Catholic bible is the same now as it was when it was originally compiled.
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
Symbolic eucharist is simulated Christ. No wonder they fall away.
@carlosux 4 күн бұрын
that ignacious press study bible is incredibly funny to me. not to disparage it but it is hefty. like watching a lineman run for a touchdown. nobody’s taking it down for a long time. 😂
@atgred 4 күн бұрын
This are the fruits of “sola scriptura”.
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
First in the New Testament to employ Sola Scriptura: Matthew 4:6
@frederickanderson1860 4 күн бұрын
He not only died he was raised from the dead. Peter himself preached same. He is sitting on the right hand of power. And without his ascension no promise of the holy spirit. Show scripture of any apostle having the power to change the Eucharist into his own flesh and blood.
@frederickanderson1860 4 күн бұрын
What about the Jewish interpretation of their Messiah is jesus. It's all about the predestination of God our true father of our salvation. God is God apostle Paul said so, did Paul consult a magisterium like you describe. Read epistle of Romans chapter 8 v 30.-31. who is going to challenge that your magisterium or pope's. God knows his own.
@atgred 4 күн бұрын
Wait! But didn’t Paul had to go to Jerusalem and meet with the “pillars”, Peter (Cephas) , John and James to let THEM decide as the Magisterium, what to do about the judaizers!?! Wasn’t he made an Apostle by the laying of hands and baptism of Ananias? Seems Paul was in line with them and their leadership. (Gal. 2:9, Acts. 15).
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
You keep claiming that you are "Christian" but are NEVER at peace. Can you explain why?
@javageek123 5 күн бұрын
Senor. Yo intiendo. Is very good. Yo intiendo. Pero no write anglais. Viva iglesia catholicca. Viva Cristo Rey You say Muy bueno points. Verdad points
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
¡Tus palabras son pura verdad!
@manny75586 5 күн бұрын
I mean...what?
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
The Flintstones were right: "We'll have a gay old time..."
@michaelbaker2552 5 күн бұрын
Christ demanded unity in his church; Luther brought chaos; chaos which continues to this day as each protestant is his or her own sect.
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
And always seemingly offended and contentious, if not outright angry. Do they not see the dichotomy?
@DoingItTheHardWayAgain 5 күн бұрын
Have a Catholic Action Bible and am expecting the Ignatius Study Bible (paperback) soon, will be enough to last me until our Lord, Saviour and King of Kings returns or until I get judged and hopefully purged of all my sins (imperfections). Tenete Traditiones God bless
@ji8044 5 күн бұрын
Ok here is a brief actual history of the canon of scripture. Right from the start there was widespread disagreements about books. Marcion put together the first canon list sometime around 145 AD. It consisted of ten Pauline epistles and a redacted version of Luke's Gospel. For the next 200 years lists of books came and went, including many, many of the books considered non-canonical today. They were regularly used in worship depending on the geographic location. For instance Jerome used the now lost non-canonical Gospel of the Hebrews in his Vulgate translation. The Epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas are found in the Codex Sinaiticus. The Catholic Church doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary comes directly from the Gospel of James. The concept of the martyrdom and crucifixion of Peter comes directly from the Acts of Peter. The earliest complete manuscript of ANY canonical gospel is in the Codex Sinaiticus, from the 4th Century, though of course there are fragments before that. The oldest complete copy of the Gospel of Thomas, extremely important to the Egyptian Church, was found at Nag Hammadi, and is the same age as the Codex Sinaiticus. A copy of the Gospel of Judas was just found 20 years ago. So there was never at any point in the last 2,000 years just one type of Christianity and there was never just one set of canon books until the 5th Century.
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
You wasted FORTY YEARS studying skewed history. I think that the Church whose members WROTE the NT and later canonized it know the history. You, sir, are NOT credible.
@CoreyJason 4 күн бұрын
So the Holy Spirit had no involvement in the final canon? What we have now is thanks to the Holy Spirit guiding man in all the confusion that was widespread during those early years of the young Church. Just because there were other texts circulating around back then doesn’t mean they were inspired by God. Satan was hard at work back then as he was during the Protestant rebellion and still to this day. What we now have as the Catholic bible is what God wanted us to have for this long. Otherwise, where is God then and Jesus’s promise that the gates of hell wouldn’t prevail against his Church?
@ji8044 4 күн бұрын
@@CoreyJason "So the Holy Spirit had no involvement in the final canon?" No, but of course everyone who write or edits a holy book claims to have been inspired by God. "Just because there were other texts circulating around back then doesn’t mean they were inspired by God." The winners decide who was inspired and not, just like writing the history books. "Satan was hard at work back then as he was during the Protestant rebellion and still to this day" I'm fine with you believing that. I just deal with history. "What we now have as the Catholic bible is what God wanted us to have for this long. " Well it's a book written solely about Jews and mostly BY Jews, so that's a hard sell. "Otherwise, where is God then and Jesus’s promise that the gates of hell wouldn’t prevail against his Church?" The word "ekklesia" cannot be translated as church, since neither the building-type, nor the organization-type, nor even the English language itself existed in the time of Jesus. To a Greek, the word would have meant a civic assembly. To a Judean it would have meant a synagogue. Thank you for the reply.
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
@@CoreyJason I do not even read his replies. He is apparently bitter. May ER receive the Holy Spirit and humble himself. Mat he prayerfully read James 3.
@CoreyJason 4 күн бұрын
@@ji8044 do you even believe in the God of the bible and the Holy Spirit then?
@duke927 5 күн бұрын
And then we have a major problem with the Novus Ordo. Which is more a less a rejection of Roman Catholicism and is a new sect of Christianity (We’ll 60 years old now) calling itself Roman Catholic but its dogma and liturgy are not Roman Catholic. In the new rite everything was changed abruptly to the new rite and the old (Ronald Knox Church) was thrown out for this new not Catholic rite.
@bonifaceonyekaba8849 5 күн бұрын
Go and sit down
@HAL9000-su1mz 4 күн бұрын
Nonsense. When did you become Protestant?