Be more pacific!

i think the reason nobody is doing that is you will never be able to lift a single compressed air tank with that engine that uses compressed air as fuel

I guess you copied the idea from the common hydraulic disc motors. Nice try.

My instinctive misgivings on ultimate efficiency concern the compressibility of air. How would an essentially incompressible fluid like water compare? Or is it the case that a varying volume demands a compressible fluid so as to avoid inflow jackhammering?

So it's a rotary piston?

What’s the efficiency on this design?

But where does the air come from? Or in case of hydraulics what pumps the fluid? You still need a motor to create compressed air or drive a hydraulic pump system.

im confused why you have the sphere instead of just a fan inside the chamber.

can you add a second air entry ? and would it work with a regular axe and a wobbled disk instead of z axe and regular disk ?

Если подуть на сам винт он быстрее, чем с мотором твоим крутиться будет)). Лол).

Put 3 of these in series on one crank. Like a compound steam engine 👍

I think there is a huge waste of pressure, while the pressure in an air drill or screwdriver have large forces so you are not using the same mechanical movement of your fan?

I see 2 problems and I'm not even a mechanical engineer... 1, how do u control misfiring and pressure loss at higher rmp. 2. Where is the torque.

This will never take off. The reason being that anywhere you would apply it, there is already something that does that job better. The function of your concept is to harness a moving fluid’s energy into rotational energy. But we already have different turbine systems for any way you could hope to harness moving fluids: Wind turbines are doing really well. Turbines in water dams. Even if you wanted to use it as a gas generator, you would be better off with a system based off of a turbo shaft because they have a process that is without cycles. Your system has two events per rotation when the seals switch. Those moments are massive inefficiencies that will make either a turbo shaft or a turbine the better choice in any situation.

This could be potentially used as an engine for cars using compressed air canisters

So you are using compressed air to spin a motor to push forward? Would it not be more efficient just to use the compressed air to directly propel the vehicle? Less energy loss from friction

hi poop

Hello, I want to generate electricity by turning the pink crank arm on the side without giving electricity by making the system you made (crank voltage generator), is it possible, can you turn the crank arm on the side? does it turn? I will buy printing and materials according to your answer.

Helal kardesim!

Aren’t these already used in vacuum attachments?

That is so impressive by nasa! I would have never thought of something like that! Your replication is also impressive!

Add oil injection and recovery stages with a small recirculation pump. Run a peristaltic pump off the compressed air supply and oil flow will increase and decrease in sync with increased/decreased motor RPM.

You didn't make an engine. You made a turbine. If you had made an engine, you would not have needed to feed it compressed air to make it work. It would have taken air in on it's own, then added energy to the air by some method (mixing with fuel and igniting comes to mind), and used that energy to spin the rotor.

I think you should do this again but instead use tesla turbine.

ITS USELESS

What if the two sides of the casing were identical? As in both were capable of providing air input and exhaust? Could you manifold the air upstream of the inputs and provide pressure from two opposing inputs? Would it increase the propulsion? And what if you made several inputs around the casing ? 4, 6 or even 8 inputs? Would it increase the speed or decrease the wobble?

Imagine this type of Disk engine Combined with a ramp pump design? could lead to a multi use engine of sorts using water & gravity

Why? the same reason as rotaries, seals.

good video man

From 4:55 to 5:30 is an AD and you should put a disclaimer for it

10,000 hours of that friction?

When power is increased ,because of the wobbling, it will destroy itself very quickly.

cool... now i can finally strap a compressor to my model airplanes and power it without using fuel.... seriously there is no point to this.

Probably makes alot of heat with the friction on that disc. A turbine would be more efficient

I guess the most losses here are in friction. How is this construction better than the usual turbine?

So it’s a complicated impeller?

Eccentric rotation is difficult to control, a minor defect can cause huge moment of inertia shift and damage the whole thing. Just look at how much your rotor vibrates.

Try adding a short hose on the exhaust side i think it would improve its efficiency by reducing turbulence

Well done I hope to see more soon.

This dude is gonna get impaled one of these days.

El ma duro manín

Minimal torque

Would this work with a liquid instead of a gas?

Wait until this guy discovers pneumatic tools!

I wonder if you could power a couple in series using this method, the vacuum caused b6 a second might not be so detrimental

Keep the wobble and make flapping wings.

Nice concept, but does it have any advantages compared to a "classic" turbine? Might have more torque than a Tesla turbine, but the regular waterwheel looking one?

how much more efficient is this than just an impeller?

This is a very old design dating back to the 1820's when Edward and James Dakeyne of Darley Dale, Derbyshire, designed and had constructed a hydraulic engine (a water engine) known as "The Romping Lion", based on the same principles, to make use of the high-pressure water available near their mill.

Hello Retsetman. Very good design and the first i see working. One question about sealing , did you try with a rubber seal stacked between the half discs, this to insulate the inlet and outlet air motion. Greetings