@@31acruz 😂 lol Non sworks is about 850g if I remember correctly with the sworks being around 750g. Weights are on Specialized website.

@@Intentsrig i have similar. My stumpy is about 27/28lbs and then I still have my Stumpy Evo for more aggressive days. It’s a great combo!

@@nick_7744 Large

They are, but if I did it again I’d probably get a standard Stumpjumper and an Enduro so that they’re a bit more different. Both are sweet bikes though! They are definitely different bikes, but for most people it isn’t necessary to have both. It depends on what your needs are. Cheers

I mean you also have to remove them to put skins on and off…

It was a size Large frame. Cheers

It’s definitely capable of racing enduro, but the answer depends on what the terrain is like. It will be great for some courses and not great for others. So yes, it can race enduro

@@TJonesMTB okay

Hey, The Stumpjumper and Stumpjumper Evo use completely different frames. When filming this video, i only had access to an S4 Stumpjumper. Since then, I’ve bought a Stumpjumper and also went S3. When purchasing the Evo, i looked a lot at the reach, front center, and wheel base lengths. The S3 fit what i like and my riding style. I haven’t regretted going S3 on either bike. I’ve had the chance to ride S4’s since, and it always reinforces my decision to go S3. Obviously down sizing isn’t for everyone, so it is best to try to demo the sizes you’re interested in if possible. Cheers

Hey there, Absolutely! For me, the sizing feels great, regardless of if I’m climbing or descending. I’m still very happy with my choice. I also have an S3 Stumpjumper, but have borrowed an S4 during a few trips, and the S4 is too stretched. S3 is right for me on both bikes. Cheers!

I believe so, for the most part. Same with the s-works version. Just need to pay attention to the label. Tread pattern should be the same. Cheers

@@TJonesMTB yes I have not been able to figure out which one is just the Pathfinder version for a 340 ride coming up.

@@rynhadn13 the one that I ride, and the one in the video, is the Pathfinder pro. Thats the tire I recommend

@@TJonesMTB I see well I am being schooled by my team that the pro isn’t for long duration DKXL type stuff but the Pathfinder was seen 9 plus times on bikes and only 2 flats. colin also had the pathfinder (only) and I can’t seem to tell the difference or see any tires for sale that just say pathfinder.

@@rynhadn13 I’m not aware of any racer that uses the low end pathfinder. I wouldnt choose the SWorks version for Unbound XL, but the Pro version should be fine. Most the pros run the Pathfinder pro unless the course is really buff, then s-works. The low end pathfinder really seems to only be used as a stock tire on lower end new Specialized bikes. Whatever your team says is best! Have a good race/ride!

Hey there, I’m 5’11.5”/6’ and am riding an S3. A rider at my height should be comfortable anywhere from an S3-S5. I prefer smaller bikes, so I went S3. Cheers

Hey there! The matte doesnt generally clean up as well as gloss unless you use the right cleaners and cloths. Personally, I just use a little squirt bottle with water and a old towel. Generally it looks pretty good. Maybe not showroom ready, but still pretty darn good. For me, that is enough, otherwise I’d be spending more time cleaning than riding… Enjoy the new bike!

@@TJonesMTB Thanks for the reply!

It’s a tough choice! Both are great bikes! I love my non-Evo Stumpjumper. Between the two, that is the bike I would choose if I could only have one. The Evo is a great bike too, but for me, the non-Evo is more well-rounded. Enjoy whichever you get! They’re both awesome. Cheers

Hey, in this video I was referring to the standard Stumpjumper (130mm travel frame) in carbon, compared to the Stumpjumper Evo in carbon. The Stumpjumper ST was discontinued. Both bikes climb better than the prior ST version did. Hopefully that clarifies! Cheers

Hey there, Big bikes ride very differently than short travel bikes and are fun in there own way! I generally live on my short travel XC bike, but love having a bike like the Evo in the quiver for days that it is appropriate. They are incredible in the right terrain, and make riding more enjoyable in said terrain. However, if you don’t have the “right” terrain available, then a bigger bike might be an underwhelming experience if you enjoy efficient bikes. Every time I choose to take the Evo out it’s because of the trails that I am going to ride, and I always end up saying multiple times “this bike is too good. Bikes shouldnt be this good”. However, I am fortunate and have a variety of bikes to choose from. Based on where I live, the Evo would not be the bike I would pick if I could only have one. That said, if you enjoy your current ride and aren’t occasionally riding more “gnarly” terrain, then adding a bigger bike may not be necessary. If you’re occasionally riding terrain that overwhelms your scalpel, then it’s probably worth adding a big bike to the quiver. I will say that descending on a bigger bike will change how you view the capabilities of smaller bikes, which may not always be a good thing. You don’t know what you don’t know, which, in this case, is how much better long travel bikes handle long travel terrain. Small bikes are incredibly capable, but once you ride a big bike, you’ll see the difference. Hopefully that helps somewhat. Big bikes are great, but sometimes they are too big for the terrain. Same goes for little bikes sometimes being too small for the terrain. If possible, take a big bike out on a few demo rides. That will give you a pretty clear answer to your question. Cheers

Thanks! Enjoy the tires!

Hey David, I actually live on the front range now (south) and still find that the bike is a good fit for the trails I’ve ridden. I haven’t ridden Boulder or Golden though. I think the Evo is a pretty good fit regardless of where you are if it falls into the travel range that you are looking for. Hopefully that helps a bit. Cheers!

@@TJonesMTB I used to have a specialized status 140 (the mullet bike) and I loved the way it descended but climbing on it was brutal with tons of bob. I currently own a Marin alpine trail but it doesn’t descend like that status

@@TJonesMTB Looking for something in between those two, it’s hard to say without demoing one haha

@@DavidFoundCo i think there is a Specialized test center in Boulder. They might have a bike you can try. I’ve personally been digging the standard Stumpjumper as my go-to rig for most rides. The Evo has become my rig for when it’s extra burly, otherwise I stick with the Stumpjumper, which climbs significantly better. Both are great bikes though!

I’ve been really digging the standard Stumpjumper. That thing can rip. And is great uphill. The Evo is pretty dang impressive though when the trail gets really chunky. Not quite as impressive uphill as the standard version though. Both are great! Enjoy whichever you get! Cheers

Awesome! I actually lived in Durango for four years! Personally, for Durango, I would go with the standard Stumpjumper. I have mine built right now with a 150mm Pike and it is an amazing rig. I’d go this route because the bike will keep the in-town trails fun, and still be enough for when you get into the high county. The penalty will be bike park days, but for me, the other aspects of riding greatly outweigh the occasional bike park lap. I think the Evo would make the climbs on the in-town trails a bit more work than they need to be, which might eventually lead to skipping rides. I like the balance of the standard Stumpjumper. That said, the Evo is an incredible bike. It is really really good downhill and can absolutely be a one bike quiver. However, I find equal joy in the climb and descent, so I prefer the balance of the Stumpjumper. It can still get down burly trails, but the experience may be a bit bumpier. At the same time, it is quite a bit quicker uphill than the Evo (my stumpy is 28lbs ready to ride, evo is 33/34lbs). I could swap to burlier tires, a Super Deluxe Ultimate, etc, on the Stumpy and probably pull some more downhill performance out of the bike if I wanted/needed. Standard Stumpjumper is the route I would personally go. Not sure if MBS is still around, but if so, maybe they have both frames you could check out. Cheers!

@@TJonesMTB Thanks for the feedback! I really appreciate the perspective, especially from someone who knows the trails around here. I rode an S5 EVO from MBS on Saturday and they have an S4 Stumpy ready for me. I’m curious about the shorter chain stays on the S4, but felt really comfortable on the S5. Still not sure if I can give up the pedal prowess of the VPP suspension, but I’m interested to see how the regular Stumpy feels. Wish there was a comparably built and priced Hightower to demo, seems I might get along with it well too. Do you feel that your new Stumpy is an efficient pedaler? I know it’s not an Epic, but curious how it might stack up efficiency wise with the other 130-140 bikes out there. Thanks!

@@Ufdah i think the Stumpy is the best pedaling trail bike I’ve ever had. Of course I’m limited in what I’ve ridden, so maybe I’m missing out on some magical bike, but I find that unlikely. The weight is also hard for many other trail bikes to match. If I added burlier tires and a heavier duty rear shock, the weight would go up a bit, but it should still be a good pedaling bike. Big days are definitely less taxing on the standard stumpy than they are on the Evo, which also translates to feeling fresher on descents. Unfortunately, I can’t compare to the Hightower, but that does look like a sweet bike. Regarding sizing, I prefer a smaller bike. That is not for everybody, so you will have to go with what feels best to you and consider the trails you ride most often. I’ve landed on the opinion that if I was going on a trip somewhere that I had no idea what the terrain was going to be, but was told lots of climbing and descending, I’d take my standard Stumpy. It’s lively, capable, and balanced. I can ride it down anything that I can take my Evo down, occasionally slower, but sometimes faster even. And I can pedal 10,000’ days and not be miserable. I’ve done 10,000’ days on the Evo, and it can absolutely do it, but I was significantly more tired afterwards and happy to be off the bike when it was done. 10,000’ days are obviously extremes, but they really make you consider the different aspects of your bike choices. Ultimately, you’ll likely be happy with either! I believe that the industry has hit a point where it is really hard to find a bad bicycle. And if your bike sucks, at least you’re out riding🤷🏼‍♂️ Cheers

I do! Still a great bike!