I didn’t know this was FeetPics channel

You forgot its instantaneous aoa underperforms too, esp withe the instructor, which makes it even worse in arb

Remember guys Russian Bias according to blue mains

Ok maybe show how the flankers acceleration is overstated? Or how it flies now like it has TVC? Or the insane AOA? Or how it doesn't lose energy? Or the fictitious dual R-77 pylons? Flanker sure is suffering right now

Too bad the su-27a is still 13.3 and stuck fighting euro fighters and typhoons instead of its counterpart the f-15a 😂

36:00 the viability of flying right above enemy AFs is why we should get tiered area air defenses in sim smh wheres the I-HAWK and SA-4 batteries this is totally not because I am desperate for SEAD gameplay its definitely for balans trust

Good workd, but it's like throwing a rock at the pond. Loud but not really effective. I compared IRL turn rates of su 27 and f15a with what we have in game. It's a massive dumpster fire, same goes with missiles. Gaijin can't model shit accurately.

It feels like Benis. It smells like Benis. It looks like Benis. It is Benis.

Yet Russian mains complain about having no good top tier fighter while having one of the best AAs, best Helicopter and very decent tanks

no more nussy 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

But squish how is blue side supposed to cope if russian aircraft arnt handicapped. Are we supposed to actually get good at the game ??

“Russian bias“

is the litening II useful for finding targets in sim or is it a nightmare to use as an IRST?

Thank you for your research, amazing work once again!

Hey best War Thunder video ive ever seen. Just to make sure i understand your main point, 4th gen FBW jets in game dont just have AOA limits that are too high, but also are way more controllable then they should be in the deep stalls they are able to produce because of it. Right?

Yet we Russian Mains still fly circles around vipers and eagles in sim games ;-;

We wont talk about the Mig29😂

The

In the case of the airshow 13s 360, isn’t that one of the air shows when it was just coming out and propagandized? It’s possible they may have removed heavyweight equipment (radar)

Silly mistake, it isn’t clearly fake and it isn’t about the rafale so they won’t accept it

Hey man I’m kinda new to sim, I know how it works I just ain’t the best at it yet. what setup and controls do you use? You got a video on it? I have a setup I like on my vkb but it’s always nice to draw inspiration 8:02 REDFOR player number moment

Is this russian bias in the room with us now?

Seen your bugreport after mention on Ru forum. If you are speaking for buffing low speed performance in exchange for some supersonic performance, then I'm all for it

where russian bias when its my turn to experience it

in Soviet service the MiG-29 did not operate the R-27ER, in spite of compatibility, owing to doctrine. might've changed if the war went hot but the MiG-29's 'primary weapon' was R-73, just as F-16's was AIM-9, with R-27R/Ts giving it a secondary-but-competent BVR capability. they didn't see a point to procuring a heavier and more expensive version of the missile for a regime that the MiG-29 was supposed to merely be competent at, especially as MiG-29 already had range and time-on-station issues. so while the modular nature of the R-27 family permits the MiG-29 to use any version of it without problems, historically, R-27Es are not a weapon system for MiG-29 until after the end of the cold war.

b-but then the flanker would be good . . . how am i supposed to crank the WEZ now? also f15 has 104-0 kd, so any plane thats better isnt historically accurate 🤓

Yes sigma

Still, after the "fix" Su-27 now at least has a chance

flanking my peanits rn

GAIJIN DO YOUR JOB, Squish best sim wt youtuber by far 💯

Really good video, and very good points about that BR in particular, it's truly a shame considering the fun that those aircraft can create.

One thing you mentioned , they could seperate the values from sim and realistic battes. But ill doubt it will happen , the servers are already kinda suffering.

Great flying, I definitely loved flying this way prior to the angle gating update. But, defeating Fox-3s was too easy and now it's more realistic to how it works. To your point of AOA limiters and Gaijin not adding these things because mouse aim, it is unfortunate, and I think it'll stay that way because of the fact that the player base is largely on mouse and keyboard, playing RB and AB for example. I'd love it if they instead added it into SB for the sake of SB, this problem however is substantial considering it's requiring them to consider balancing these higher tier aircraft around this in ways that are unrealistic for example. Hope something changes and AOA limiters get addressed, it's unlikely however.

IMO the idea of deleting the FBW limitations were bad, if i wanted to play a Jet game where the F16 can pull 20Gs id play Ace Combat 7. and its not an insult to AC7 game is great. But WT (at least Realsitic and SIM) are supposed to have realistic flight models, that includes flight by wire limitations, structural stress damage and all.

looking as for american equipment you went by the introduction date (which is here and there), then for the mig-29 it would be 1983, r-27e would be 1990, r-73 would be 1984 (mig-29 was designed with the r-73 in mind and shouldnt even get r-60m in game, while it is the r-27er the -12 and -13 shouldnt get)

I dont think the realism should apply to RB, but should apply to SB

why is everybody talking about fbw? did war thunder announce something about fbw?

Hey, so the Rafale FM just got buffed in STR and while trying it out I found that Statshark was overestimating it by a whole 2 °/s (no missiles, 30% fuel, 700 kph IAS). It was more like 1 °/s for the EFT. Do you know if these discrepancies are representative of Statshark in general, or are these exceptions? Btw my testing wasn't optimal, as I basically just use full real and trim controls on my keyboard.

man, I have learned so much in this video, thanks for making it

Chat is this real

"unfortunatelly, pilots have been exceptionally successfull in discovering new combinations of airspeed and maneuvers that will result in loss of controls with sometimes irreversible consequences." what th fuck was happening in israel?

Fighter generations is like the astrology of plane nerds

What's the point of playing sim game when "historically accurate fbw is no fun"? Its not fun for the f-16 player lol, but fun for his opponents :) Gayjin chose money here. Actually there are so many double standarts at top tier, the game is dogshit One thing I didnt hear(maybe Im deaf), is that the contraption of those f-16, EF2 and others can collapse at too high AOA and high speeds, it's not just "stall and fall". And stalling stability is also a big problem because it increases so stupid much. And yes, F-22 MOST OP EVER SUPER MEGA MAGA JET, F YEA Stealth is invisible for cameras just like civilian people in camo in the street are invisible 🐵🐵🐵 36:22 thats dirty

selective realism is literally condition where most games exist. you just need to implement it properly. oke, let's imagine i'm Vasya ol' Soviet boomer, i just like plaens and not care about which numbers did another boomer write into manuals. F-16 has abysmal ammo capacity (hello you clown which increased team number in ARB), and i can admit that. but then i look at Mig-29smt and a question arises. and it's VERY important for ARB since you can't always run and do frags just passing by (with exceptions), you have to defend yourself sometimes. plus, maneuvering is obviously more fun. sadly, Gajub don't look at gameplay means as well. they don't look at tournaments as well. and only way to make them WORK (just like with some Russian politicians) is to bonk them constantly with massive complaints before it annoys them enough 36:32 lmofdslflgsodfposlsfofsofhsfhsdfsfhhhd

Coming from the DCS, the difference between 3rd and 4th gen is clearly seen there: 1. While flying in a fox1-capable 3rd gen, like the mirage f1 or an f4e, you aren't sure that you'll have your fox1 shot before the merge at all. And if you carry advanced fox1s, like 530f or aim7f/m, your launch probably won't happen at ideal launch parameters. There are several factors contributing to that: the radar being a fairly weak, being able to pick up the target only a few miles further than your optimal launch range at best, your radar requiring some efforts in positioning to be able to pick your target at all, labor-intensive radar operations and iff (or lack thereof), limited situational awareness. So, in a 3rd gen, you've done your job well if you got a fox1 shot at all, not speaking of doing some proper bvr and fox1 geometry 2. 4th gens have fully capable look-down shoot-down kits, along with some digital processing of radar signals, and more powerful radar sets in general, means that you are pretty sure that your fight will include fox1 bvr phase. Your opponent may utilize some tricks to avoid it, but it's hard, and you are generally counting on a bvr duel. And your systems allow you way more positioning in order to get a tactical advantage in a fox1 slinging contest, you don't babysit the radar, but do what you want to do instead, and rely on your radar to do its work in any situation 3. When dogfighting in a 3rd gen, you are really concerned about your energy. Even a lightly loaded mig21bis, with more than 1 twr can't regain speed in a dogfight easily. Thus, gen3 dogfights are slow-paced, with everbody flying at around their optimal corner speeds and really rarely doing soms high aoa stuff and being extremely cautious at cashing their speeds, because one that looses his speed first usually dies 4. In a gen4 acm, everybody is way more aggressive. Those planes can regain their speeds casually in a dogfight, thus, they allow way more risky moves, deflection shots and missing your shots when you've cashed your speed into them. 5. Also, throttle management comes into play. In a 3rd gen, you generally merge as fast as you can and burn as hot as you can, because your plane will burn any excess speed you have in a moment. Generally speaking, you can't be too fast in a 3rd gen dogfight (there are exceptions of course). 4th gen can and will fly faster than you'd wish it to in a dogfight So, where does the f14 fits here? In terms of bvr and missile slinging, it's definitely in a 4th gen league. The radar is more labor-intensive than a typical 4th gen radar, but you have a special guy in the back to work as a radar computer, and your radar has the same level of capabilities as a typical 4th gen radar. In terms of maneuverability, it controls like a 3rd gen, but with capabilities of a lower-tiered 4th gen

50:30 dude in the chat asking for PVE lol

Came to see squish video returned from university lecture🤓

I know you said you rambled a lot but this was, in my opinion, a very well put together (as put together as a drunken no script video can be) and explained video. I didn’t expect to watch the full hour, but your ability to break these topics down made it a very interesting and informative watch. Thanks dawg