As an Indian , I must say Partition was the best thing that happened to India .. Those indians who think about it as a mistake and wish reunification are stupids

Kuch bhi bakchodi

Jinnah never offered SALAT nor kept SIAM, then how he became founder of Pak , Bacically a fraught, brought miseries to BANGLA speaking people ,

Sir,an ardent indian nationalist,ended up as hindu hater.

such an amazing podcast

Sir,partition has been a done deal since 1947 ,77 years ago Prof Jalal and her fans now should move on since partition can not.be undone. At present it is irrelevant who was the hero and who was the villain. More than Mr Nehru ,the center player has been Mr Jinnah, a hero in Pakistan, and a villain in india.

Jinnah/Muslim League had accepted Cabinets Mission Plan, but Nehru/Congress rejected the Plan which led to partition of India and emergence of Pakistan.So historically it is incorrect to say that Jinnah or Muslim League was responsible for partition of India.

Sir,the question you should ask is whether a centuries old simmering communal conflicts between hindus and muslims were resolved in any way. Rehashing history time and again is a useless exercise.

Sir,the Lahore resolution and idea of Pakistan were good starting point to resolve centuries old simmering communal situation,but was never carried towards an ultimate conclusion. Since Mr Jinnah made no attempt to transfer entire indian muslim population to Pakistan. Instead it opened a new pandora box resulting in continual wars and state sponsored terrorist activities.

Sir,Mr Jinnah was quite clear about his objective and has clearly and unambiguously laid out the reasons behind his objective. Congress under the spell of Mahatma Gandhi never fully understood Mr Jinnah and was dilly dallying all the time. Surprisingly and tragically none of the 2 sides even thought of coordinated systematic transfer of population from either sides and were busy celebrating the emergence of 2 countries out of 1 country.

Sirs,state,nationalism,and islam can be grouped under 2 heads. State+Nationalism vs islam Islam has no concept of either state or nationalism. Two terms of islam which comes closest to state and nationalism are: caliphate and ummah. Both these terms negate the concept of state as well as nationalism.

U both look judwaa siblings 🤣🤣

Why is this in English. Goron k liyay banai hai yeh?

Israel zulm pe zulm kar raha par America aur Europe uski madad kar raha hai. Pakistan ko apni Johari taqat iran turkey saudi se share karna chahiye jaldi. Par hum bewkoof buzdil aur khudgarz hain

Are you saying Jinnah wanted a Muslim majority pakistan INSIDE a federation of India ? That would have been catastrophic because this meant the country would have been internally divided on basis of religion and a lingering source of conflict and a long term civil war . With the meddlesome Muslim league out of India , the Indian leaders could focus on nation building and establishment of Democracy . While Jinnah and the Muslim league had no idea or plans for running a totally independent country and the result is that pakistan is still struggling to come together as a nation with No government ever completing a full term .

If congress accepts the cabinet plan then India cannot function as one nation one people. Jinnah himself knows this truth, that it is because when he created Pakistan he rejected the cabinet plan and follow Indian function. Moreover, congress also knws that Muslim league is not capable of running a government so a power-sharing is disaster. Congress vision proved correct when Pakistani people and army removed the Muslim league. Another factor is that partition of India suggested by jinnah and Muslim league at first. Many of jinnah's speeches also states that and people voted for him. Finally, u said congress forced partition? right. This idea caters to many constituencies - it strokes the conceit that Pakistan was an amputation of Mother India; it appeals to locals who believe separation a bad business from the beginning; and it denies Jinnah any responsibility for Partition. But can u explain this statement of jinnah "It would be a great mistake to be carried away by Congress propaganda that the Pakistan demand was put forward as a counter for bargaining.”

Movement in 1953? Oh the movement by unelected bigots calked the Majlis i Ahrar?

East Bengal ? Is the author feeling some kind of shane cslling it East Pakistan.

Great content, thank you.

From this video, it appears clear that the man fit for a stage actor in London in fact should had landed in a circus winning a captivated audience with his acrobatic skills. "Monkey-like skills for monkey like amazement." Mental illness takes an advance form if the patient is devoid of histories----yes, in plural. He was, to his daughter's regret, had been too absorbed in devouring the biography of a Turk. American political experience flew over without hitting his empty head. Enough. It's more than depressing. He was allowed to play politics because the Muslims were playing marbles in the desert of Arabia.

I want to know just 1 thing 1. Why Jinna delivered his speech " At first we are Muslim then we are Indian "? Please explain me. 2. On which miracle reason Jinna never went to jail?

Sir,the core thesis of Prof Jalal has been debunked by Mr Jinnah himself when after 1947 he did not agree with power sharing in Pakistan. Rest is a matter of debate with no end in sight.

Jinnah never possessed the capacity to assess a very bad idea of two states from various angles. Regional fact? Islam’s incapacities? Muslims inabilities? Absence of history.

Could someone explain the psychology of political leaders who accept being bullied around by the army generals? Why accept playing the role of a puppet? Where are the social graces?

Ayesha Jalal is a liar. Her PhD degree should be withdrawn. She could not prove the main propositions of her thesis. She could not prove that Jinnah was a secularist. Jinnah could not prove that Jinnah never wanted Pakistan.

❤❤❤❤❤

Love how Uttar Pradeshis are the poorest people in both India and Pakistan, yet always show up to bark on any content that remotely presents Pakistan or its founding fathers in positive light.

Jinnah by no means a nationalist- Hs was the driver of partition with Islam and self interest as two tyres. Wasindifferwnt and insensitive to Hindu genocide. Was clear about the fact how India would be pushed back by a few decades. He n Nehru were hand in glove supported by Gandhi. Three anti nationals .

Ayesha Jalal is a liar. She could not prove anything like Jinnah was a secular and Jinnah never wanted to create Pakistan. Her PhD degree should be withdrawn.

If a party or a person supports the colonial power against it's own countrymen, I assume such people across the globe are called traitors or Gaddars, that was exactly the role of Jinnah and the Muslim League. Why do you think Pakistan is suffering or why it will suffer till it lasts? The reason is because it's foundation has been laid on Gaddari.

jinnah was just an islamist & if his idea of separation was so great why didn't all muslims follow him to phakistan. At least India would have had some peace.

The contents are bullshit

Jinnah wS a traitor , and mooooslims got their land called paxtan because of that traitor called jinnah , end of the story

Jinnah was f*ing traitor to India , and so was gandhi and nehru , Period

Aisha Jalal is liar, Her book cannot be trusted. It ignores facts. Stop spreading lies

Jinnah wanted a free India where like the mughals , Muslims will rule over the majority Hindus...that didn't work ,and bloodshed followed

Ali Jinnah conceived the idea of a separate state for the Moslems as early as the 1930s. The British administration and M. Gandhi did not want a partition at all, and offered a Moslem majority Government to Ali Jinnah on the upcoming independence. Nehru did not see eye to eye with Ali Jinnah and ultimately INC voted against that concession in 1947. Ali Jinnah saw his beloved Pakistan become a reality, but would be dead a year later. It is so boring to hear Indians today to blame partition solely on the British. It is such an important part of their modern history.

sir a lot of people want this type of summary on different books

hardwork will pay you

j0ker

Urdu must be banned in Pakistan now such a foul language!!

Sir urdu me btaty to sab ko samjh ati

“Populism.” By 1977, the remaining Pakistan of Jinnah at last laid to rest. “Populism.” Drunk on power, he kept Islam as one of the pillars of constitution. With the question of Ahmadi, the populist, in tune with popular passion, ended up branding the community as non-Muslim. He did it against his own convictions. “You get what you deserve.” A shameful end. Death by hanging.

great job make videos on other books too

plz in urdu we are pakistani we speak urdu

Very high quality content need to be 1m subscriber

Muhammad Bin Qasim attacked Sind 1400 years ago and made 20000 Sindhi girls loondis and sold them in the Arabs to generate revenue ; Pakistani resold Osama bin Laden and generated billions of dollars from the west and Muslim world for Pakistan. It is called the Law of Karma.

Nice Content Brother, Keep it up

Keep it up brother just do the real thing don't think for the views it will come soon insha Allah. Just Keep it real.

Ibn Battuta is a human heritage