The Hidden World of Catholicism
0:32
THIS is the Latin Mass
3:37
Ай бұрын
1700 more Latin Mass priests
4:32
Mixed drinks with our NEW CEO!
1:46:55
Did Vatican II create the New Mass?
22:40
This can weather any storm
2:50
Жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@outofthebox7
@outofthebox7 26 минут бұрын
Just to answer the question. You cannot seek in faith God when He has not been revealed to you, you can just search on His Existence or non existence. If He reveals Himself, you will know Who He is and it's only to bring you to His family and save you from sin and its penalty, hell. God is revealed to the humble (this is they HUGE KEY, humble yourself, convince yourself of your motives in seeking Him, and He will act to meet you) and then they are welcomed to follow Him on His terms. God cannot be found if He doesn't want to be found.
@finlan212
@finlan212 Сағат бұрын
I thank GOD so much we have the Traditional Latin Mass in Uganda ❤
@sam.e.a6422
@sam.e.a6422 2 сағат бұрын
32:06 ok here is a very disingenuous point because its been studied and looked at that the novus ordo mass has more of the bible read then the vetus ordo and this is factual. The vetus ordo had only 60% of the gospels read to the laity at mass and around 25 of other sections of the new testament while the novus ordo has 89.8% of the gospels read to the laity. The calendar this way is far superior to the old ways. I love everything else about the latin mass though it has character. I donot appreciate this framing though because it's fundamentally dishonest.
@sam.e.a6422
@sam.e.a6422 2 сағат бұрын
The problem lies in that the people who quite literally make an idol of this very form of mass. Yes the fetus ordo is brilliant and beautiful and timeless and I love it. But the choose schism over it is wrong plainly, y'all claim to love the church but show the opposite by linking masses done illicitly by sspx rogues that have been already been war ed of by several bishops, rogues who taint your movement.
@Kris-pz1wv
@Kris-pz1wv 3 сағат бұрын
This was a good conversation, but unfortunately, I don’t think Fr. Pine gave satisfactory answers to Alex’s questions. I understand that human nature makes it difficult to acknowledge faults in your own arguments, but still I had hoped he would do better. For example, when Alex brought up the question about sin, I think Fr. Pine could have been more honest and said something like, ‘Yes, that does seem like a bad thing from God, and I don’t fully understand it, but I choose to believe that He is still just.’ I find it so sad that Christians are unable to condemn God for things that are clearly evil. If a human being had done some of the same things, they would be seen as worse than Hitler or other terrible figures throughout history.
@2Uahoj
@2Uahoj 4 сағат бұрын
Not sure why someone as smart as Alex cannot understand how a deception can also be a sin. Obviously, if we are not vigilant (let alone disobedient), we can "allow ourselves to be deceived." And in the case of our first parents, it was much worse, as they had been given life by God, they know him and what he commanded - yet they deliberately disobeyed. So, in this case they were rather full participants in their own "deception."
@JumpingNoodleSquad
@JumpingNoodleSquad 4 сағат бұрын
It's good, but I do feel like some of the questions were answered in an unsatisfactory way. Btw Alex speaks so clearly and simple, whereas father is way to advance to even grasp for me at least.
@jesseb1677
@jesseb1677 5 сағат бұрын
Alex has the articulation power of a seasoned orator and the naivety of a child. As he will delve into psychology and review his own role as devil's advocate, I have no doubt he will come to know God well. Keep knocking!
@jamiefaucett7216
@jamiefaucett7216 6 сағат бұрын
I think Alex would agree a lot more with what early Christians actually believed aka Marcion of Sinope.
@bevanbasson4289
@bevanbasson4289 6 сағат бұрын
Never seen a debate where the apologist comes even close to making sense on the problem of evil and the hidden God. Yet I watch hoping that this time it will be different, alas it is not.
@Roach9994
@Roach9994 10 сағат бұрын
Fr. Pine seems like a genuine guy and I appreciate the conversation. However I am struggling to see where he responded to Alex's questions appropriately. Most of them were not full addressed leaving them unanswered, replaced with tangential discussions.
@incrediblystupid8483
@incrediblystupid8483 10 сағат бұрын
If you think God is up there somewhere hoping you will find him (like Alex) then you dont know scripture. Jesus praise God publicly for hiding Himself from certain types of people. Part of the reason is (Psalm 138:6) . . .Though God is high, he takes note of the humble, But the haughty he knows only from a distance. . . But even the haughty will stand before the judgement seat of God. Then they can debate Him, GOD!
@kevinjensen2071
@kevinjensen2071 11 сағат бұрын
This guy is just making shit up.
@Chris-w2p6j
@Chris-w2p6j 12 сағат бұрын
That was my armor in dark souls 3
@sasinin6
@sasinin6 12 сағат бұрын
I love latin masses . I pray the rosary in latin and it heals my mind and body. Latin hymns are divine. This heritage should be preserved for future generations too. Thanks for this video and love from 🇱🇰
@PInk77W1
@PInk77W1 12 сағат бұрын
1:21:48 Alex said if I asked u to say happy birthday to my Spanish cousin and I lied and had u read something that is blasphemy. I can’t be guilty ? He leaves out part of the story. God warned Adam and Eve not to wish anyone Happy birthday in Spanish. Alex is smarter than that.
@debgab9259
@debgab9259 13 сағат бұрын
I am a practicing catholic but lately have been thinking about the old testament and the Jews understanding of it through the Torah. I caught site of this rabbi giving an explanation on the story of adam and eve that I thought was good and made sense (to me). In a nutshell; Eve was smart with the choice to eat the apple.......would love to hear any additional input after watching the link below on the rabbi's explanation. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eonbi2qIgq2nasksi=fPPgqq8kKPHpb7nd
@angel.apollo
@angel.apollo 13 сағат бұрын
Alex's argument for religion based on geographic area is right on. People are tribal and usually follow what people are following around them. It's not because one is true and one is not. They are all just stories. You either believe the story was inspired by God or the story was created by humans.
@YeshuaIsTruth33
@YeshuaIsTruth33 13 сағат бұрын
📖 The Christian worldview maps on our experience of reality far better than any other
@MattT-P
@MattT-P 13 сағат бұрын
I can almost see the wars over the abolishment of slavery as analogous to the descent and the fall of the angels / gods peers fighting over the freedom of the serfs. Some jealous or angry of the freedom of the slaves and some supporting it.
@tomhannigan5804
@tomhannigan5804 17 сағат бұрын
‘There are places in the heart that do not exist until suffering enters in’ So true
@joeruf6526
@joeruf6526 17 сағат бұрын
All Alex has to do is question his English liberalism and he's home.
@tehdii
@tehdii 17 сағат бұрын
58:04 While hearing it I conjued an image. I now know why I feel tired when I hear religious people spining in place to explain everything in the logic of man made religion. It is like talking to a person who just discovered number 2 ( previously was fine to talk using all numbers ) and was told that it is the most important number through which he should understand and explain everything else. So I think many states of the world force me to think about it as 1+3, No no, the world is 2+2, it must be, God is the idea that can not be abandoned with one and three. Using Two is the only way...
@andrefouche9682
@andrefouche9682 17 сағат бұрын
I am a Catholic and just want to compliment Alex since I have watched him a few times and never did he portray arrogance. He is respectful and humble and obviously intelligent.
@dharmayogaashram979
@dharmayogaashram979 19 сағат бұрын
Alex is politely as possible trying to get the monk to see how brainwashed he is. God the ultimate Strawman. He is not real.
@OurLadysTheology
@OurLadysTheology 19 сағат бұрын
The Sacred Liturgy is the worship of God, not God Himself. Therefore is it Liturgy who redeems the earth, or Christ Jesus Himself who is made present in the Liturgy? Please clarify.
@robertchflynn
@robertchflynn 19 сағат бұрын
Pine has no response as to why god chooses to "hide himself"...
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 19 сағат бұрын
God or Consciousness (which in the East and the higher ages has been defined as one and the same) it is ‘the hard problem’ for philosophy, it is experienced as religion whose definition is that to which we are bound. Evil comes from duality from opposition. If there was unity nothing would be manifest, no duality, no evolution, no learning or coming to full self-aware consciousness and the choice to align with reality; otherwise we would be determined autonomies. God as transcendent is without evil; in manifestation and duality it necessarily exists. Alex is missing understanding this.
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 19 сағат бұрын
Religion is symbolic; the snake represents energy and what is done with it.
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 19 сағат бұрын
The serpent symbolized energy and how it is used. Alex is taking the story literally when it is meant to be taken symbolically. There was energy but no actual serpent; that is the symbol as when written there was no words for a lot of things so it all had to be symbolized as the Church has symbolized transubstantiation in the ceremony of the Mass. Even in the cusp of a quantum age this is something that cannot be literally explained or understood. A symbol or symbolic ceremony gives us a clue of what it actually is.
@Kyerte
@Kyerte 19 сағат бұрын
It's hard for me to believe that the USA appreciates the traditional mass more than Mexico; there are many churches in the USA where this is celebrated, but in Mexico, there are less than a dozen.
@Sui_Generis0
@Sui_Generis0 20 сағат бұрын
Wait this was recorded around a year ago, he's referencing ken ham video?
@dharmayogaashram979
@dharmayogaashram979 20 сағат бұрын
Simple: There is no provable "One Male (as opposed to Goddess) Creator Being"; e.g., God. Words and their meanings are important. What anyone experiences within theirself is their business, but trying to prove that to another is not possible (and not necessary). Religions ( charity, community,etc.)are necessary just try and clean up the delusions.
@RCEmichaelreavey
@RCEmichaelreavey 20 сағат бұрын
"When we see Him, we will be blinded. All our wisdom and understanding will fall silent." Karl Jung
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 19 сағат бұрын
Exactly the same was expressed in ‘The Cloud of Unknowing’ by a mystic whose name I do not recall.
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 19 сағат бұрын
The same was said in ‘The Cloud of Unknowing’ by a mystic whose name I do not recall.
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 19 сағат бұрын
Posted twice as first didn’t show up so I posted it again.
@jennapecor1865
@jennapecor1865 20 сағат бұрын
If you seek God and can’t find him, it’s probably not God you’re seeking, it’s the image of God in your mind you think God is. Alex has had numerous discussions with Christians and as I can tell, he’s read the Bible (maybe he hasn’t in its entirety) so God is right there, he just continues to find intellectual reasons to reject him.
@jennapecor1865
@jennapecor1865 20 сағат бұрын
If you seek God and can’t find him, it’s probably not God you’re seeking, it’s the image of God in your mind you think God is. Alex has had numerous discussions with Christians and as I can tell, he’s read the Bible (maybe he hasn’t in its entirety) so God is right there, he just continues to find intellectual reasons to reject him.
@Sui_Generis0
@Sui_Generis0 20 сағат бұрын
Pine is not really tackling what Alex says in this discussion
@tehdii
@tehdii 21 сағат бұрын
23:26 ALex gave words to the half of the population. Sincere, sober, true. Sadly acording to Christian logic this type of gods creation are going to the bin.
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 20 сағат бұрын
There is believing which is the opposite of not believing; both just a matter of belief. Then there is actually knowing which is a great gift; it comes from actual experience which cannot be argued with. Once a person has a genuine and deep spiritual experience then it is actually knowing because of the experience. There are many believers and many non-believers but fewer knowers. Knowing from actual experience is a great gift and it is not clear how it happens or why but it does happen and those it happens to are extremely lucky. It would not be exchanged for anything the world could, or would, offer in its place. The definition of God is: Consciousness; Existence and Bliss. We share in the first two, our senses substitute for the last which we have to attain by transcending our mental selves and transcending our senses as well. Then we actually experience Consciousness; Existence; Bliss which has been named God. As far as suffering goes, the soul is never affected but human consciousness evolves to where it should be. A lot of human suffering is caused by humans opposing Reality rather than aligning with it. The monk is very nice and honest and Alex does a great job in this interview.
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr 20 сағат бұрын
In terms of evil there are two choices; unity or duality, without duality we would not have anything manifest or a chance for evolution and knowing as separate Selfs. So duality, although painful, is necessary even though it does involve suffering.
@tehdii
@tehdii 21 сағат бұрын
20:00 why so much spining... I get it, but still the amount of bs one needs to invoke, always being on the gifted side, is disenchanting...
@tehdii
@tehdii 21 сағат бұрын
19:00 St Teresa should write SF. Why SF was regarded as trash, and when some delusional people think about some unreali things they are right? I am sorry, but what is this?
@joeyboi83
@joeyboi83 22 сағат бұрын
Alex felt uncomfortable for the first little while, you can see is body language.. don’t blame him though.. he is an intellectual realising he is discussing god with a religious hippy
@otuyachukwudi
@otuyachukwudi 23 сағат бұрын
Alex is saying that God doesn't speak to him. And God doesn't speak to anyone who is not catholic. Do you see the problem? It's not true. God starts with you were you are, every inspiration to yield yourself to what is Good comes from God. His counterargument is that it makes all religion seem right. That counter is also flawed because love doesn't force people into what they don't appreciate. His counter to that is that God is supposed to be desperate enough to beat human social and geographical structure to make himself known since their salvation depends on this. That counter is problematic since it assumes God is unfair at Judgment day and only accepts souls who knew him in the Advanced way catholics with wonderful theology do. But the Catholic Church already answered that, God is a righteous judge and the sacrifice of Christ and his church can provide a way to salvation for the people who were sincere to truth and Goodness (God) but didn't know him with sound theology through any fault of their own. Secondly, God does beat social and geological limitations. Christian ideas are what modern societies are built with, and the inate appeal of doing good, human life having value and meaning these are the voices of God. He would then ask what then is the point of evangelism if God will judge fairly at the end. The point is the production of more material and spiritual good in this world and the provision of extra chances at salvation for souls who have chosen to reject truth and goodness in favour of a wicked selfish lifestyle.
@princelordcarinan8199
@princelordcarinan8199 Күн бұрын
It’s a leap of faith
@szymonstefanfranciszek
@szymonstefanfranciszek Күн бұрын
We have in PL good people who made a film about LM youtube.com/@matt_and_anna?si=ZcOH8WvObRJ_76rT
@SimonFalkentorp
@SimonFalkentorp Күн бұрын
I’m only commenting on the title. What happens is that “we” become believers instead instead of religious. Humans do not “find God”; but some are found by a god.
@SuperSeaanemone
@SuperSeaanemone Күн бұрын
So the Christian God allows some people to suffer because, by his will, they are born into a culture antithetical to the gospel? Lots of mental gymnastics from the monk without truly answering Alex's question. The guest posits God as the luminous monster which we are bound to acknowledge no matter the cost! I'll rather take my refuge in Jain or Buddhist dharma. At least they have made some positive headway in the religious project, where the psyche of living beings are considered and developed. Theism is really the mind destroyer 😮
@JordanBrown-km5kf
@JordanBrown-km5kf 23 сағат бұрын
Well, is a greater good achieved from the overcoming of such an obstacle? Are you not faced by challenges that in some ways make you a better person? And I don't think that it is that far of a stretch that if there is a creator, then he wants his creations to know him. But he is also just in that he can't force people to accept him. Because that isn't what love is. You are faced with the fact of free will hinges upon your personal action. God invites you to participate in salvation through grace.
@tobias4411
@tobias4411 10 сағат бұрын
​@@JordanBrown-km5kfFree will is in direct contradiction with an omnipotent God. If God is all knowing (omnipotent), he knows everything that will happen, including every choice you will make. If God already knows your future choices, those choices are predetermined. If your choices are predetermined, you don't have a free will. Therefore, free will cannot exist if God is omnipotent.
@JordanBrown-km5kf
@JordanBrown-km5kf 3 сағат бұрын
@@tobias4411 Well what is the primary cause of this universe? You? No. You are an agent of a secondary cause. Free will is a secondary cause. What you chose to make happen is known by God. Is that an illusion of choice? No, you still made the choice. What you are describing is the God of Islam. That God has already predetermined and caused you to act against God. What God is, is a being that can still be omnipotent while having people be free to make choices. It is not contradictory if you have a framework for causation. From CS Lewis, After all, we are most free, it is only with a freedom God has given us: and when our will is most influenced by Grace, it is still our will. And if what our will does is not voluntary, and voluntary does not mean free, then what are we talking about?
@acr164
@acr164 Күн бұрын
As a Catholic, I was impressed with Fr Pine until they got to original sin. Clearly, Eve sinned knowingly because she explained the detail to Satan. But we need to pray to have our eyes opened by Christ, not try to comprehend ourselves. Good arguments fail with poor precepts. Alex lists a series of arbitrary precepts which are not entirely the truth and then makes reasonable arguments with these poor peecepts. Thats my humble opinion.
@acr164
@acr164 Күн бұрын
....but Fr Pine finishes brilliantly.
@ryan-smith
@ryan-smith Күн бұрын
17:10 By his definition of fairness, then every janitor in a company has the right to complain that they are not the CEO or at least a manager. And everybody has the right to complain that it's unfair for Elon Musk to not treat them as a friend.
@jacoblee5796
@jacoblee5796 21 сағат бұрын
This is a dishonest take from you. Does Elon Mush say he's all powerful, all loving and all knowing? Does Elon Mush say he wants to have a close personal relationship with you and everybody else on the planet?
@ryan-smith
@ryan-smith 16 сағат бұрын
@jacoblee5796 Did God say so? Show me the verse. Or you're just attributing characteristics of God so that you can attack him with your strawman argument?
@jacoblee5796
@jacoblee5796 16 сағат бұрын
@@ryan-smith So god doesn't what to have a close personal relationship with us? Are you not a Christian? You don't sound like one.
@ryan-smith
@ryan-smith 16 сағат бұрын
@@jacoblee5796 Again, show me a verse where God even hinted of "wanting to have personal relationship with you".
@jacoblee5796
@jacoblee5796 15 сағат бұрын
@@ryan-smith James 4:8, which says, "Come near to God and He will come near to you" I must be confused about what the Christian Faith is, I thought it was about having a relationship with god. I thought god wanted this for our benefit.
@flyingsunbeds909
@flyingsunbeds909 Күн бұрын
The priest or monk or whatever he is seems with his answers, to descend into some kind of babble interlaced with references to certain biblical verses. In the end we get a meaningless string of words. The questions were circuitous but I could get to what Alex was trying to say but Pine's answers were just this babble.
@Epiousios18
@Epiousios18 Күн бұрын
you are trying so hard to sound smart and witty, it's adorable.
@jacoblee5796
@jacoblee5796 21 сағат бұрын
@@Epiousios18 Like what Father Pine was pretending to do? The OP has a point, Father Pine never really answered or even engaged with Alex's questions. Alex often had to reword and re-ask his questions. Why do you think that is?
@GGM20000
@GGM20000 Күн бұрын
As human we are very prone to impose our definition of what we think to be best on God. On one hand we desire complete freedom to act out our desires based on our limited experience in time and space within our limited lifespan. On the other hand some much are in the background operating by the.laws of physics which we ignore or incapable of sensing. We only optimize what we can account of with our senses not with all other factors that are running in the background. When things do not turn out the way what we define to be great, we blame the system; we blame God. Since where we are are results of our decisions which again are derivatives of what and who came before us, no one can have the same set of initial conditions to start with even for siblings from the same families. If Alex assumes an equal share of good fortune and opportunity is an absolute prerequisite for divine justice, then the only way it can happen is we all come out identical as a batch of products from a factory. If you define diviine justfce as everything be equal, then you will never be happy or satisfied. The sheer fact that our initial conditions differ necessitates the search of a different paths to attain the optimal states we can achieve. Those optimal states will differ depend on where we were at the beginning. Free will in human and entropy in nature are incompatible with equal outcomes. Alex needs to understand this part.
@trafficjon400
@trafficjon400 Күн бұрын
its not the time yet maybe for alex to be answered or prvailed. but for all the ones who lived and died in over 2000 years ! probably wondered what the time even means. not truly being prvailed in any shape or form except finding car keys or something better in a reality carnal way.
@nickcowley1980
@nickcowley1980 Күн бұрын
Alex your body language is defensive. Does pine press your world view ?