I can use one word as a base

hi ken! You am therefore i

19:54 I literally got my 4 year old a chainsaw for Christmas.

Here on Luke "TLC doesn't dominate my time" Thompson's recommendation (it's an inside thing). Just curious-are you able to give an example of Jesus creating feminine space (listening without counsel) in his ministry? Honestly, I can’t think of one. What does come to mind, however, is that instead of focusing on creating space, which is ever-present in its essence, Jesus chose to fill space with what he defined as quality. He brought Logos. He aligned his actions, words, and presence with authenticity and sincerity. By penetrating every moment with God’s grace (and at times not so much grace) and truth, he grounded and enriched the spaces he inhabited, making them meaningful and alive for those willing to accept his Logos. That, I believe, is the essence of true masculinity. I do agree that listening and being present in a situation of immense suffering is best if you cannot provide more to the space, but it shouldn't be the ultimate aim is what I am trying to say. BTW, I must say, your commitment to stepping back from the idea space is truly admirable. This is something that I think a lot of people are grappling with.

Here because of Nealson

34:00 as long as my church is in decline, i know i’m in the right place

Here because of Luke -2-

Here because of Luke. Wonderful conversation

31:30 “there no longer remains a sacrifice for sin…”

18:27 the trap of evangelism So good. ❤ this long? 20 min segment is gold.

57:46 iconic thinking. Eucharistic knowing. The nonduality of identity that includes duality. Christologic.

20:25 -54 “understanding contextually. To understand something in its seed is not to understand it in its fullness. “

6:00 My wife has never resonated with these conversations, at least in the way they're typically had. Which doesn't mean that the things that we're talking about are irrelevant to her (or to people like her). But some things are not for everyone. And that's ok. I think our values and goals are the same, but the way that we think about them and process them are very different. And that's probably a good thing. Or a neutral thing.

Congrats gage.

Makes any Ken appearance even more special

This was a wonderful dialogue. It’s a profound insight that disordering the relationship between the higher and the lower, even for the best of reasons, can worsen situations, and I also think the insight that “problems also bring with them their own meta-problems”-that in working through a problem we can still be operating in its logic-is of profound criticality. I think from that we find a basis for humility, a need to focus on particularity (as you both beautifully noted), and also a need to just work on being aware of what is before us. “Religion and Nothingness” was great to hear discussed, and the phrase “you have to take the journey that is presented to you”-that’s powerful. I was particularly taken by the idea that an oath in the classical world was basically scandalous, which lead to the really really really great insight that helped articulate something I’ve felt but not been able to put to words so well: if you commit to something like a church, but reality eventually presents you something different, you’d then have to find a loophole against your oath, which is dangerous for the soul. That’s so fantastic. I’m going to work to remember that articulation. I agree that Lewis is worth reading into your heart, and I strongly agree on the idea that when we are struggling to find the right balance between competing responsibilities as a parent, then we should just turn and love our spouse more. In my grandparents’ house was a plaque that said something I’ve only found more true with the years: The most important thing a father can do for his children is love their mother. I have that plaque to this very day.

What a tender conversation

Excited to see Mount Sophia pop up on my feed again…

secure base

Am attention: your id words let me relate so what do you mean. sure you can copy me. however, you keep talking i words first ;)

Am attention :)

David's pun on "trialogos" seems to mistake the etymology of "dialogue" (or "dialogos") to be something about "two-ness", which is understandable since "di-" can mean "two" in some Greek-derived words (e.g. "dilemma",) but the "dia-" in "dialogue" ("dialogos") rather bears the meaning of "through" (and by extension, perhaps "thorough"); "across;" "between." A dialogue is not necessarily a conversation between *two*, as David implies, but rather, a "thorough" discussion which reaches "across" and "between" the interlocutors. So his pun is based on an etymological near-miss. Surprising in a man so learned.

Do your words work as am or are you speaking false humility for support sometimes

You don't need to try. Silent auto secure base plus optional id speech and people relate to potential and your past

Are you trying to reply to my mirror of the Michael situation? What an anchor. -elijah logozar, ok i can actually listen too, i mean i saw your description here. naturally the timing feels related to my comment about 'pls repost the video we had last summer' (on YOUR channel) ;D

Great conversation. Thank you all for sharing it.

Robots dont die

I resonate with the diagrams. Seems straight forward and the combo perspectives made it even more impactful. Thank you!

the Tensorial relationship between InTentional Focus and Mechanistic AtTention Intellidoscope equation including XZY+Q Coordinates Let 'T' Stand for Tensorial Let 'I' represent Intentional and 'F' be Focus Let 'M' represent Mechanistic and 'A' Attention. •X( zi Fqt(mA ) Z𝐈 ( aM)TQf zi )Y•

my modelling suggests that such a Twistor Bundle is fifth dimensional. •X( z5d qtb() Z5d ()BTQ z5f )Y• Exactly! in regards to the body and mind, The body an mind relationship can be considered much the same way as a markov blanket . •X( z qb(m )Z( M)BQ z )Y•

•(()())•

Hyperspacetime Coordinate System at T≈0 •X h(s zc qt() ZC ()TQ zc S)H Y•

Well, you have the other video? -elijah logozar channel is down rn, officially at least ;p

Having listened to Jordan since my journey to Orthodoxy began in 2018 or so, I am consistently happy to see him speaking the way he is. This conversation is lifegiving!

Very happy I found this channel. Some very fine folk to hear speak, thanks all.

'dont even know if they are bad in the first place' ;D

TO BE REAL :D :D :D wow ur so cool

non propositional! yay we can chat ;D & i listened 33:00 on, ;D e:i might need to finish the video tho l;

Wow, you are back!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D

You two are wonderful conversation partners. I enjoyed this just as much as your appearance on Lucas' podcast a few months ago. Plenty to chew on!

Welcome back, Ken. It is interesting to watch you wrestle with the cycles of transformation God has allowed/created in your life. I encourage you to dig out the precepts and principles of transformation found in 1Corinthians 3:18, Romans 12:1-2, Psalm 37:3-6, Ephesians 2:10, and Matthew 5:16. Let me know if you would like to discuss further. I believe you can translate to the next gen of leaders and would love to help you do that. Have a strong day in the Lord.

What a nice surprise! Congratulations to both of you!

Thanks again, Ken. Loved speaking to and learning from you!

This was really nice. Love you both. Right there with you guys. I may write some reflections and send in a whatsapp group to you both

Great conversation! Congrats on the second child Ken, and happy to hear from you again. Best wishes to you and your family.

Only in the north America's could there be three people in a room with humanities degrees of which two identify as practising Christians That part of the world needs to start going in the European direction of increasing secularisation before it goes completely crazy

Great conversation. Hopefully everyone understands what Jonathan is talking about and the terminology doesn’t make it confusing as if they’re talking about magic or something because talking about trans personal agents as angels or gods makes perfect sense, and I hope people are familiar with the way they’re speaking. Jonathan’s face when John started talking about bioelectric self organizing constructs that we all ready are making was priceless.

What an anchored conversation!

Great talk ❤️

25:25 On the descend, I descend into my actual life as it is ATM 🙃 And then walk from there, wherever I am. ❤️ And that means facing what I'd rather not face - because I have fear and doubt and the lack of humility - some would say, I might be a sinner ^^ 😁❤️❤️