I hear you... fusion is king for compositing. But to say it's "not a motion graphics tool" isn't actually right... there's lots of nodes in fusion that have no compositing use at all. Blackmagic has also called it a motion graphics tool repeatedly. Visit their website. They use the term 'motion graphics' to describe fusion more than they do "compositing'. A quick word search will prove this. It's clearly for both. The point of my video is that Blackmagic have more work to do on fusion, if their aim is to outcompete Adobe.

@@RyanOsborneUK I would say Nuke is king for compositing, and Fusion comes right behind it. Then the price vs performance and quality it's obviously a huge win for the Blackmagic piece of software. Regarding Fusion being for both, I kindly disagree. Blackmagic is marketing DaVinci Resolve as an all in one package, including motion graphics, with Fusion. They refer to the Fusion page that lives inside DaVinci. Basically you don't need to open multiple software (like you would with Adobe), but you can comfortably stay in DaVinci and do it all. The combination of all the tools you get inside DaVinci + Fusion, in Blackmagic Design mind, gives you that motion graphics capability (which is no slouch, don't get me wrong). I was using Fusion way before Blackmagic Design bought it, when it was Eyeon Fusion. In fact, even earlier when it came in bundle with Alias Wavefront Maya and it was called Maya Fusion. It has always been a VFX compositing tool. Motion graphics wasn't its thing, it's never been in the first place. Nowadays yes, it does have many tools that look like they have no use in compositing, but those don't make Fusion a motion graphics software (I mean as its main goal). Regarding Blackmagic wanting to outcompete Adobe, I don't believe they are even thinking about that either. They earn their money from the hardware mainly. They are already eating Adobe Premiere's lunch, and largely outperformed that in every possible way. The dynamic link in the Adobe Suite isn't exactly stable, to put it mildly (in fact is a bit of a chore, unreliable and buggy). It's cool when it works. The DaVinci Resolve Studio interoperability system, on the other hand, just works (jumping from one page to the other, Edit, Color, Fusion etc etc). Is see your point, and I tend to agree with what you are saying. I just don't think that Blackmagic Design is actually relying on that motion graphics side too much.

Hey, thanks for the coffee. Did you install the font first, yeah?

@@TheOrsonLord let’s do it man

@@RyanOsborneUK Awesome, followed you on twitter, will DM you there once accepted :)