Mandos N-1 Star Fighter Ship Review
6:53
Stoic B By Marty
17:51
21 күн бұрын
F-41 TimberWolf Review
9:31
Ай бұрын
Baffled Hydrogen System
20:53
2 ай бұрын
We Need This In Game!
4:34
2 ай бұрын
Hunter Slayer Build
21:54
3 ай бұрын
Super Carrier MSI Crescendo Review
19:11
Drake Kraken
13:17
3 ай бұрын
Hell Divers Meta Logic Is Wrong
35:44
Hell Divers Cadet Tips
4:45
4 ай бұрын
Helldivers 2 Eagle Review
5:13
4 ай бұрын
Strike Fighters
8:16
5 ай бұрын
Light Fighters
7:56
5 ай бұрын
Drop Ships
10:52
6 ай бұрын
Thursby 2.0A Review.
7:57
6 ай бұрын
Gun Boats!
9:54
6 ай бұрын
Fast Tube Trick
5:30
6 ай бұрын
AUC-AG5-HF-217 ENSIS Ship Review
21:23
Sand Worms Mod Review.
3:05
7 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@iamaperson.9471
@iamaperson.9471 16 сағат бұрын
Fun fact that central pillar in the deck is I'm guessing the ship's mast. The ship's captain doesn't sit while in command, they hold onto a stabilizing bar built into the mast
@jcataclisma
@jcataclisma 2 күн бұрын
👌👌👍👍👍
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 7 күн бұрын
I love the Tripathia Class, such a beautiful ship. I remember when Daniel from spacedock was first talking about it and other similar ships before he started the Sojourn channel. It was originally classed as a heavy cruiser before he changed over to the rating system that is now used.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 7 күн бұрын
Ya it's a cool ship just wish someone would do a sojourn mod in weapon core.
@marty7442
@marty7442 8 күн бұрын
You did a boo... yes you did... yes... THE BOO BOX!
@bobbywinicher9080
@bobbywinicher9080 9 күн бұрын
Sooo this video...idk if has helped anyone but myself not really one bit. Becouse i can tell there is obviously a player made camera "turret" for looking. But when i made one, if weaponcore is being used i can not assume control of the "turret" camera. So maybe explain stuff like this.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 9 күн бұрын
There is a "shared control" feature in the turrets control menu.
@bobbywinicher9080
@bobbywinicher9080 8 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 im talking about the camera "turret" not the actual turrets
@bobbywinicher9080
@bobbywinicher9080 8 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 For semi working after doing som messing around but how did you get turrets to aim were you were aiming becouse the turrets aim towards my little camera "turret" instead of were my camera aiming
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 7 күн бұрын
Shouldn't do that. Did you put a glass pane in frount of the camera cause that can cause weapon core to target you with missles.
@bobbywinicher9080
@bobbywinicher9080 7 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 no i dont understand, its a starwars mod and i just have a rotor hinge above with a camera on it. Then turret control to use
@elijahpostell6553
@elijahpostell6553 9 күн бұрын
Awesome
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 9 күн бұрын
Your welcome the Sojourn ships are really well thought out vessels.
@jcataclisma
@jcataclisma 9 күн бұрын
😎👍👍👍👍👍
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 9 күн бұрын
Thanks trying to find a vanilla version of the huntress.
@TankFerretPresents
@TankFerretPresents 9 күн бұрын
Ahoy all you sagacious scalawags i
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 9 күн бұрын
Ahoy to you ya preening swab!
@friedec3622
@friedec3622 11 күн бұрын
Could you list all mods you're using?
@friedec3622
@friedec3622 11 күн бұрын
I just wish space engineers has better enemies system. The space is divided into several zones where higher zones has harder and numerous enemies. The rewards of clearing this zones is gaining access to rarer or bigger mining sites, repair NPC, etc. I kinda don't like randomly generated enemies.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 10 күн бұрын
That maybe coming in a future update.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
Cruiser is a large multipurpose warship, what basically is a operation base for entire guild. Those ships basically can do everything cruising around the space and blowing things up. Basically indefinitely (full facility including rafinery). The only exception is that they generally should not fight other capital ships. Which are typically designed to take them out. That is all. Battlecruiser is basically the same, but with some traits of the Battleships and they job is specifically hunting the other Cruisers and support of the fleets during the battle. Though typically they aren't as capable in this role like proper battleships.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
I forget to mention. Cruiser is the only case where combination Warship and a Carrier make some sense. It is even actual thing called Cruiser-Carrier. it is because Cruisers generally also shouldn't take a hits, relying on hit and run tactics. And they also may use crafts for scouting, what also is one of main jobs of this type of ships. Battle-carrier is abomination and instant red flag, until you intentionally do an alien design.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
Assault Ships aren't actually medium size. But if we consider landing capability as a factor, then yeh. It make sense. Nothing to add in this video. It is exactly what Assault Ships are.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
This actually would be simple. Destroyer is a dedicated warfleet escort. As such it need to be capable to catch up to them and face threats a warfleet would take. So a capital ships. That is also source of glass cannon myth. Destroyers by design punch above the weight in environment where they are expected to fight. But they are actually absolute monsters in own actual size category. But of course not everything is for free, as Destroyers tend to lack many facilities. Interesting sub-category of Destroyer is a Fleet Destroyer. Those are bit larger Destroyers, what are actually expected to perform scouting duty, checking way taken by the fleet. Those tend to be bit larger (paralel to Light Cruiser). But otherwise they serve the same role as smaller Destroyer. Trope wise, this type is where you also would expect massive spinal gun. As they may try ambush enemy ships, before arrival of the heavy hitters. In context of the game those are pure combatants! Designed to take and deal hits, to be as compact and maneuverable as possible. Destroyers tend to not have any facilitates (except decent jump drive) and may have almost no crew space, as they rely on support of the larger ships. But generally if you see not too large ship build to kill. That is a Destroyer! Also I decided to mention convoluted history of this class: Everything begin with invention of Torpedo and rising threat of Torpedo Boats. Quite fast threat was countered with use of older class of Gunboats, also armed with Torpedoes (Torpedo Gunboats). But they have major flaw! As boats they were limited to a coastline. Problem was solenoid by Spanish who designed large Torpedo Gunboat called Destructor. It give beginning of this ship type. But with introduction of aerial and submarine threats, (Torpedo) Destroyers grow even larger. This cause problem to the British who need smaller ships for different task. So Corvette was actually a derivative, as small specialized warship (Frigate come from that later, thorough US initially defined Frigate as larger then Destroyer, but that later changed). Anyway (Escort) Destroyers grow and at one point they were large enough to take duty of Fleet Leader, what were Light Cruisers performing scouting duty. The End.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
Ok! Major mistake detected! And I must point it out. Destroyers absolutely SHOULD have good Point Defense! That is actually they main job in the fleet and they typically have capital grade weapon only as bonus, as they may commonly face enemy capital warships. But fighting them is not they actual job. They actual job is the ESCORT duty! So in fact keeping Fighters, Frigates and other trash far from larger warships. That is unfortunately huge mistake in this video! The main difference in opposition to Corvette is that they can take hits and Frigate that they are more specialized for fast combat, for example heavily relying on hydrogen power. When Frigates usually are more economic (more Ions) as you not always can rely on refuel. I hope it is clear?
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
Frigates are literal definition of Jack of all Trades. Those are ships large enough to do most of the jobs (they also can be easily specialized), but small enough so loosing one would not be huge blow to operations. Those are basically workhorses od the navies and most ships used by players fall in this category. Especially as they have decent cargo space. Though they aren't really expected of proper fleet combat, at best somewhere in second line. In context of the game those would be basically typical well armed and fast, small mobile bases, with assembler setup allowing repairs in the field. Decent crew space as you would stay long time in those. Sometimes even rafinery. Weapons would be diverse as you never know if you bump on ship or the swarm of fighters. Though commonly you would end running from the threats. Especially as they should be also affordable. I personally also use Escort ship type (called by Americans Destroyer Escort and British Sloop). Those are basically armed merchantman or low end warship, used for protection of the convoys. As those may not have jump drives (especially AI cargo ships) Escorts also do not need have it or may have optional. Typically larger then Corvettes as crew spend a lot of time inside, but sometimes even less armed and structurally sound. Absolute budget design! I could also add Escort Carrier. What are smaller Carriers used for providing craft maintenance of convoys and fleets lacking proper Fleet Carriers. Those also tend to bit more armed in point defense and to a degree overlap with Escorts. But they have proper facilities for usually a wing of fighter crafts and a jump drives, so they could escape without loosing assets. Destroyers are sometimes defined as uparmed Frigates (what literally Heavy Frigate is). But those get explanation later.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
So my general comment about this issue. But first of disclaimer I would say only once to not repeat in every video. Ship Type (the proper name) is a role ship fulfill in the navy. Not a size! A role. And it is extremely dependent on in setting how big those are and how things relate to other things (this also change between countries and time periods, so same ship may have different classification depending on that, but the role still stay defined). So what is a Corvette? It is smallest capable warship. Dentition (in modern sense) was for the first time used during WW2 when British need cheap ship for anti-submarine roles, after Destroyers grow too large for many smaller tasks. It is why it is sometimes defined also as "glorified gunboat" what is sometimes also used regard early Destroyers. In context of SE, Corvettes are cheap, easy to mass produce ships. What are generally capable of interplanetary travel (usually have jump drive), but still are in high end of the mass produced. For example using ship printers. Many Corvettes also is capable of planetary landing, because they are small enough for that to be relatively easy and they tend to serve as auxiliary ships for moving between military operation zones. Despite being expendable, they commonly do have basic assembler setup and med bay in case of the crash. As they are expected to operate far from the bases. As side note, related Gunboats are short range, mass produced, specialized heavy crafts. Quite commonly lacking any support equipment as they are expected just to do the job as cheap as possible and not go far from the base of operation. Tend to have cockpit instead proper command deck. Corvettes are that on steroids.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
My take is that MCRN was extremely pretentious regard ship classification, basically intentionally misusing ship types to show how independent they are from Earth. But principally they really weren't really that different.
@TheDovensian
@TheDovensian 13 күн бұрын
One thing to remember, think of destroyers almost like the rifleman of the fleet. they are versatile, dependable, and need to be plentiful enough so that they can effectively complete their objectives. Depending on your weapons system that you use whether it be vanilla or something like the assault weapons pack, understanding, the loadout of a destroyer is important. Capital size weapons that make sense aboard a destroyer need be layed out well. For the Example at hand, I’ll use the (Yet Unpublished) “Doveka” Class Destroyer. Its armament consists of 5 dorsal twin barreled 400mm gun turrets, three ventral twin barrel 400 mm gun turrets, and two twin barrel 400 mm gun turrets to both port and starboard. All weapons on board are staggered so that all forward facing weapons can fire forward in direct action. All of this is complemented by the quad 1000mm spinal gun battery. Secondary armaments include 8 43mm rotary auto cannon turrets, 6 220mm burst fire rocket turrets, and a set of 4 80mm flak guns. The armament of the vessel is primarily dedicated to taking out enemy ships, laying down heavy firepower, while still having some capability to defend itself against and other perceived threats. Much like you touched on in the video, it’s length is only 62 blocks in length however, it is a bit taller than most of its contemporaries. The reason behind this is to incorporate more internal space for damage control systems, and crew accessibility. Depending on the design, a destroyer can be either very well-made or very poorly made. You either have a very well made destroyer, or a very poorly madelight cruiser, heavy frigate, or some other assault vessel. All of the ships here are great examples of a destroyer in their own respective lore, and everyone here has done a great job of capturing the feeling of what a destroyer should do. They need to be built in such a way that whatever faction is utilizing them, has a dependable, cheap, easily relied upon, capable vessel that can punch hard, take a task and complete it.
@elijahpostell6553
@elijahpostell6553 14 күн бұрын
Looks awesome very shiny
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 14 күн бұрын
Yup liking this 1940s fighter plan paint.
@Sn1perBunny
@Sn1perBunny 15 күн бұрын
I love the colour pattern on these vessels of yours. Not sure if you did it just to show up for the video, but I think they're quite effective dazzle camouflage. The bright red rounded head of the ship is certainly a distracting target, as opposed to the rest of its more subtle colour pattern. I bet it would be hard to hit these where you wanted to.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 14 күн бұрын
Their not mine but the ship is in the workshop if you want I can do a review of it sometime as it's one of the top ten star trek ships.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 16 күн бұрын
My all time favorite drop ship is the UD-4 "Cheyenne" Dropship from Aliens. Able to deploy the heavily armored M577 APC and infantry while providing firepower support.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 14 күн бұрын
I want something smaller but just as functional as the cheyenne.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 13 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 That's understandable; but the Pelican is even bigger than the Cheyenne. The LAAT is smaller but the vehicle carrier version is close to the same size. The Terrapin is smaller but doesn't transport vehicles either. For the most part is falls right into the same size range.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 17 күн бұрын
Gotta love gunships but for me I like to call them Cutters since they're also the patrol and law enforcement vessels of a star system. Granted there are other types of Cutters which could be another video for you to do. Like you said they're like frigates taking on utilitarian roles as well but I'd say they are more utilitarian then frigates where as frigates are more combat oriented. So like the US Coast Guard you got your law enforcement and patrol cutter which you pretty much already have right here in this vid. You would have salvage and rescue cutters which can also be used to confiscate ships and cargo which is a handy ship to have when seizing a defeated pirates goods. You could even have a variant of a ice breaking cutter that's meant to deal with asteroids being a heavily built and sturdy ship that can take a great deal of impact damage and can also be used to tank hits from pirates who happen to get their hands on some heavier firepower. And of course all of them would be capable search and rescue vessels some of them also tending to space buoy's or satellites. Lots of fun and great video.
@nyakssj1370
@nyakssj1370 20 күн бұрын
Me as The creator of my own version of Daedalus class ship laughs in 280 mil kgs
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
How many jump drives you packing?
@marty7442
@marty7442 22 күн бұрын
I was actually considering that about the classification myself in regards to size. Corvette is more suitable. Also maybe should have mentioned the airlock activates by closing the open door as well... Thanks for the review. It is now listed as a corvette.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Your welcome it was a cool build dude.
@bolland83
@bolland83 27 күн бұрын
Wow, I'm super late to the party here, lol. Great vid! Thank you!
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Your welcome.
@Polnomo4iya
@Polnomo4iya 27 күн бұрын
I am the creator of this fur, thanks for the video
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Well it's awsome. I really like it and it's done well as a review.
@Polnomo4iya
@Polnomo4iya 19 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 Can you do a review on another of my work?
@OwlThunder_Gaming
@OwlThunder_Gaming 28 күн бұрын
Me and my faction have been looking for a reliable, smaller sized, drop ship/gunship that can fit in the belly hangar of our capita ship. We’ve currently been making do with a Wyvern, however it’s hard to recover Any reccomendations from the workshop?
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
I might make one some time.
@OwlThunder_Gaming
@OwlThunder_Gaming 19 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 we switched to a Valkyrie, but if we’re always looking for something that isn’t *utterly massive*
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 17 күн бұрын
I could try building a drop ship the kicker with the pelican style is it works for troops and ground vehical support in light recon vehicals and armor.
@OwlThunder_Gaming
@OwlThunder_Gaming 17 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 true, true *(We may or may not just build them on the deck of the ship then drive yhem off the side into the atmosphere)*
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 17 күн бұрын
@OwlThunder_Gaming could lower the mass by using hydrogen for maneuvering, atmo for in planet flight, and ion for extended space flight.
@OwlThunder_Gaming
@OwlThunder_Gaming 28 күн бұрын
As a war thunder player, I agree
@sevyrsonpc4736
@sevyrsonpc4736 28 күн бұрын
I found another one! Yes, it is based on a ship from star citizen. It was a fun build and I have made a total of 3 based on this concept. Thanks for the review!
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Your welcome. I saw it and remembered it from Obsidian ants vid I think.
@sevyrsonpc4736
@sevyrsonpc4736 19 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 Haven't heard of that channel. You got a link?
@sevyrsonpc4736
@sevyrsonpc4736 28 күн бұрын
I like how he butchers my name every time. I think your world was set to have scripts off, none of the scripts that were supposed to be running were active. Great review overall.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Thanks and sorry for the mispronounced name.
@sevyrsonpc4736
@sevyrsonpc4736 19 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 All good. No one ever gets it right.
@sevyrsonpc4736
@sevyrsonpc4736 28 күн бұрын
Hey man, was just directed to this video you did on my ship by a kind player on Steam. Nice review. It is due for a nice update given that the ship is a couple years old now and I have learned a few new tricks. Dropped a sub so I can follow your future vids. Keep it up.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Thanks sorry it takes so long to respond my schedule is messed up at the moment.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 29 күн бұрын
Fun video always gotta love battleships I mean how can you not love a heavily protected vessel meant to deliver firepower dominance. For suggestions in identifying more warship types I would suggest the Monitor and I don't mean the USS Monitor from the civil war. I'm talking about series of warships built by the British which were meant to provide offshore battery support. They did not have the protection of battleships or battlescruisers and were in fact smaller than cruisers they were poor seaworthy ships that were not very maneuverable; but they brought big guns for artillery support which is ideal for an island nation military power like the UK. I could definitely see them having a place in a sci-fi setting where they can be dedicated to supporting planetary invasions and occupations while the other more true warships are busy else where taking on the enemy fleet. If you were looking for glass cannon it would be these ships. You could also do videos about the other two warship types with battle in their title, the battlecruiser and battlecarrier. However there would have to be a signifcant difference between them and the battleship. As you pointed out the Iowa's were fast battleships which rendered battlecruisers obsolete; but then again no one was trying to build battlecruisers when the Iowa's came along so. They are all roughly the same size but each lack something that the other two have. Battleships would have the firepower and protection; but lack the speed. Battlecruisers would have the speed and firepower but lack protection. Battlecarriers would have the speed and protection but lack the firepower. Sure they can deploy a small number of strike craft like a carrier but due to its limited number of squadrons they're not going to be as effective and the battlecarrier itself is not gonna have the same amount of firepower as a battleship or battlecruiser.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
Battle carriers would be a good one.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 29 күн бұрын
Oh I'm so so happy you mentioned that point defense is a must have on a carrier. I've never liked completely unarmed carriers, might as well just be a plan boring transport ship. I do feel like these are more just escort carriers due to how cramped they seem but thats no big deal really. Another good vid definitely enjoying your warship type identification series.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 19 күн бұрын
The quasar in starwars is a great example of a carrierwith good point defence done right.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 19 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 oh yeah I like the simplicity of the Quasar
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 17 күн бұрын
@ImNtDead fun fact it's one of the few star wars ships with an in cannon design flaw in the structural build.
@justcallmedots8339
@justcallmedots8339 29 күн бұрын
can you please link the items from video in description so that we can subs to them?
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
I could try I'll see if I can find the ones for this video and post a comment with links.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 29 күн бұрын
You said cruisers don't bully; but thats exactly what cruisers were originally meant to be as they were the commerce raiders which is bullying transports and freighters. Even the battlecruisers despite being big capital ships were also commerce raiders which is why they were originally called battlecruisers and not fast battleships. The cruisers were also originally being built larger to keep certain ships from coming after them so the enemy has to send either a group of ships or the same size ship to get rid of them because cruisers were the biggest bully's of them all and they remained that way all the way up until WWII. Otherwise great video; but I'm surprised that you don't go into the subtypes of light and heavy cruiser.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 13 күн бұрын
Yeh. I put it that way. While Frigates are low end Jack of all Trades. Cruisers are large, multipurpose ships what are basically flying basses. While not expected to fight Battleships, they absolutely wreak havoc among anything smaller. The big thing about them is that because they are self-sufficient. They can be basically anywhere. Lurking in the void to raid your base and leave you crying.
@elijahpostell6553
@elijahpostell6553 Ай бұрын
Oh the you colored it now and looks good
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
Yup its based on the p 15 lighting after all. It must look like a 40s fighter in spce.
@Subatomic_Vulcan
@Subatomic_Vulcan Ай бұрын
Awesome build!!! Would make a great addition to any fleet.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
Glad to hear it.
@marty7442
@marty7442 Ай бұрын
TBH I would be too distracted with stealing the SPRT cargo ships, and end up with all I need from that salvage, breaking the scenario, lol
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
Ya it would be nice to get one but no we will earn our way to freedom!
@jimclayson
@jimclayson Ай бұрын
The newest Keen Newsletter on "LoRa Models" includes (among other things) a concept art picture of a nice-looking digitigrade mech leg... so maybe there's a chance (albeit a slim one) we'll see something promising in 1.205. Non-squishy, non-clang-y mechs would be a dream come true for SE. Making them transformable would be a huge bonus. BlackArmor and some others have some nice walkers and the like, but as things currently stand, they're always going to be significantly sub-optimal to the point of near uselessness. Defensive Shields certainly helps considerably.
@user-rh7yj8ze5m
@user-rh7yj8ze5m Ай бұрын
You have to build the large non Industrial refinery ( I had the same problem not sure if it's a Bug or not.)
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
That makes sense might try that tuesday.
@JammyONE
@JammyONE Ай бұрын
The gun turrets look like they are obstructed by the engines.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
Could but in space you can turn the ship to put most if the guns on what ever you want to attack.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead Ай бұрын
I'm so glad you pointed out that destroyers are not just glass cannons and can be brawlers as well. I've never liked how some make the claim that they're just glass cannons. I also like that you got into subclasses of destroyers with flanking destroyers and such. Speaking of subclass I would mention Escort Destroyers and Destroyer Escorts and yes there really is a difference between them. However there is no need to mention them because their roles could be fulfilled by frigates.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 29 күн бұрын
Ya frigates are the jack of all trades ships.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 29 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 Yeah its the work horse of all warships
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 13 күн бұрын
The "glass cannon" thing come from fact that they are expected to punch above they weight. If Destroyer bump on Battleship and would not cause enough damage, it would be smoked rather fast. But in own weight category, they literally are the brawlers, kicking ass of any smaller ship. Escort Destroyers tend to be typical Destroyers. Not expected to go above they primery role of screening. Destroyer Escort or in short Escort (or as British call them Sloop) is antiquated name for basically armed merchantman or low end military ship, providing escort only to the convoys. I just call them Escorts. They tend to be bit larger then Corvettes, so they would stay in space for longer. But they aren't really expected to fight.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead 13 күн бұрын
@@TheRezro I get punching above their own weight being able to deliver a death blow to larger warships. But it seems like over the past ten years I keep coming across people who that all a destroyer is meant to do. As if it has now other weapons or capabilities. Its insane.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 12 күн бұрын
@@ImNtDead Yeh, most people straight do not understand what is a primery role of a Destroyer. It is a escort of the war fleet. Everything else is derivative.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead Ай бұрын
The majority of arguments for what the difference is between a ship and a boat are mostly antiquated from before the 20th century. If you were to ask a ship builder today they would tell you that ships have certain design complexities that make them more ideally suited for traversing the open oceans where as boats are less ideal and have limited range restricting them to coastal waters. Submariners call their submarines boats out of naval tradition from when they were called submarine boats and were restricted to coastal waters or were tethered to mothership via an airline. However in today's navy they are registered as ships and it shows in their title USS which stands for United States Ship. A submarines equivalent in space would most likely just a be a frigate or a destroyer that can cloak. Understanding the difference between ships and boats I really like your established doctrine that corvettes have to be jump capable. Which is something I agree with because if it wasn't jump capable I would just call it a system patrol boat or maybe give it the designation of Cutter. I'd also like to mention that while it is true that corvettes are primarily long range patrol and scout ships they are also meant to be rapid response ships where they can quickly deploy and provide reinforcements as escorts. Which is why some corvettes are heavily armed such as the Soviet Nanuchka class.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 13 күн бұрын
FTL capability is heavily lore dependent. But that is the usual dividing line. Gunboats (I call it purely because it sound cooler) typically operate close to facilities. Corvette should be capable to make comfortable travel between the planets.
@joshuarock237
@joshuarock237 Ай бұрын
Ah man this is so damn cool, makes me feel like a smart boi 😂😂
@rooblertuber
@rooblertuber Ай бұрын
I absolutely love the sojourn and the ships in it. BTW, Those two parallel orange glowing bars at the back are the heat exhaust vents for the ship! Kudos to the builder for making this wonderful ship in SE and to you for making a showcase about it.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
Ah that's right space dock did a video about thermal management you know how it works in universe?
@rooblertuber
@rooblertuber Ай бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 nothing very special I’ve heard about them. The Thermal radiators are just there to reject access heat that’s building up in the ship and keeping said ship in a desirable temperature range for the crew and electronic equipment. Can’t have your ship become an easy bake oven while you’re in it lol
@flywheel88
@flywheel88 Ай бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 Hey man. Builder here. Thanks for making a video on it. Never expected it to get so much attention. I should probably mention somewhere that the torpedoes do need a target to fly properly. And yes it is a radiator at the back. All spacecraft need one as there’s nothing in space to cool anything off. So engines, weapons, computers and even coffee makers will be connected to it. (Side note. Torpedo reload instructions can be found on a screen in cic.
@DobbsyLondon
@DobbsyLondon Ай бұрын
British Imperial Tea trading company
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
There we go we must meme this to keen.
@keahiokalani1
@keahiokalani1 Ай бұрын
"because currently I am God" got me.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
"Be creative and multiply your fleets!" Book of badger chapter 1 verse 16.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead Ай бұрын
Well unless you base it off of a specific time in naval history or are inspired by a ship classification system of a certain IP a frigate can basically be whatever you want it to be and it will not be limited by size or weapons.
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
Yes in starwars there is a logistics frigate that's bigger than most ISD's
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead Ай бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 There is even a Frigate smaller then most corvettes hehe and some of these same frigates are also called cruisers its pretty wild
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
@ImNtDead that may be for international laws or treaties.
@ImNtDead
@ImNtDead Ай бұрын
​@@badgerwildgaming6908 well one reason had to be the changing of the classification systems from the Rusan Reformations to the Annaxes War College system. This would cover some but not all so I imagine another reason was language barriers. In a galaxy of over 20 million races misidentifying ship types is almost guaranteed. An extension of that possibility is self identification and national pride. In the interwar period and World War II the USA didn't adopt the term frigate when the British brought it back and chose to identify their ships as destroyer escorts
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
@ImNtDead startrek does this with the warbird class with the Romulus.
@J0shuaGam3r
@J0shuaGam3r Ай бұрын
I love the deep dives into the logic and use of ship classes. This all makes me feel like I'm playing a different game. Where do i need to go to participate in these epic ship battles where this information is inspired from?
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
Ya tho the one vid I want to do is a theory classification on the difference between a battle ship and a dreadnought.
@TheRezro
@TheRezro 13 күн бұрын
@@badgerwildgaming6908 Battleships literally are Dreadnoughts.
@Rhys-gv3ir
@Rhys-gv3ir Ай бұрын
do i need the top mounted camera? i dont have the dlc
@badgerwildgaming6908
@badgerwildgaming6908 Ай бұрын
Nope regular side mounted cameras will do! Anything thing that can give players an edge in pvp is free and the cosmetic updates you will have to buy for more custom blocks and paints.