English is hard. The Third Temple of Solomon is not yet built. "When you *see* the Abomination of Desolation standing in the Holy Place," is very specific. Yet it's simple enough that a 5-year-old can understand it. Nevertheless, Jesus is the Word of God and so, the Apex Communicator. He doesn't need you, or me, or anyone to speak more plainly than He can. At the middle of the Great Tribulation, the Antichrist will break the Israel-Arab peace treaty, abort Jewish ritual prayer, sacrifice a pig to god (himself) and do away with all world religion, installing himself as god. It's very plain.
@educational44346 сағат бұрын
To save you some time if you have already decided that the preterist/historicist view is false, this video espouses a preterist viewpoint.
@michaelwolfe88887 сағат бұрын
Good word, brother! A bit more kindness, and fewer spicy memes, from some of the names you mentioned would serve well for calming the waters.
@paulv755410 сағат бұрын
These guys are getting closer.....just need to take that next step into full preterism.
@whathappening532311 сағат бұрын
Dispensationalism I am still there after 53 years. Time will come When Jesus will return Man will continue to speculate on the time of that coming. If somebody is giving me a date I ignore it when it happens it will happen. But we have to be watching. for that coming.
@SimonJification11 сағат бұрын
I can relate to what's being said at ~11:00 mark. I live in Finland and speak finnish but was born in the Netherlands and am 75% dutch. Wouldn't wanna die for either country. I do relate more to the universal body of Christ than any country. That said I don't disparage those who have strong nationalist leanings. As an outlier and an edge case I can't force my perspective on others who represent the majority. I see value in Christian nationalism nonetheless.
@SimonJification13 сағат бұрын
I think Jim Jordan's interpretation is better. He thinks the sons of Eli committed the first abomination of desolation. The common preterist interpretation comes from the book of Maccabees; the Maccabeans interpreted the sacrifice of a pig to be the the abomination of desolation. The problem with that is that the Maccabeans are not self-critical. The Maccabeans can be wrong, the books of the Maccabeans are not Scripture. It is far more logical that the abomination of desolation is something abominable the Jews did that caused the glory of God to depart from the temple and leave it desolate. It is the abomination that causes desolation after all. Ezekiel too is shown an abomination that causes desolation in a vision, even though the term is not used.
@SimonJification13 сағат бұрын
Also think about this: "when you see the abomination of desolation in the temple, flee" can not be exactly equal to "when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, flee". Why? Because when the Romans are inside the temple sacrificing a pig to Jupiter or whatever, then it is too late to flee. Should have fled long ago already. That makes me conclude that there are two signs to flee, not one; Matt and Luke use similar language but speak of different things; and the abomination of desolation is committed in the temple when the Romans are still far enough away, or there is some other kind of window of opportunity, that it is possible to flee. Armies surrounding Jerusalem are not the abomination of desolation. An abomination is something covenantally sacrilegious. Destruction is still desolation, though, but there's the desolation of the temple and the desolation of the city, which are different things. The desolation of the temple does not require the destruction of the temple. God leaving the temple is enough for it to be desolate. There's just nothing in there. It's empty; desolate in that sense. Also if a city is void of all people, it is desolate. Destruction is not strictly necessary. We can safely say that the desolation of the city includes it's destruction, but the temple is desolate before the city was destroyed. I think it is not necessary to exactly identify the abomination of desolation and I think it is generally a testament to preterism that some of these things are so hard to pinpoint. It is by design, to discourage us from pointless speculation. The biggest problem in my opinion is that people bind each other's conscience on these things. People don't realize that declaring a biblical prophecy fulfilled in front of our very lying eyes requires practically a papal-like ex cathedra authority. That alone to me is reason enough to reject all other eschatological paradigms.
@spiritandflesh847716 сағат бұрын
This interpretation makes the most sense from what I read. Why would Jesus say this generation if it wasn’t going to take place during the time period he lived in? The content of Jesus warnings as well as the prophets was vengeance on the idolatrous generation he witnessed to. John asked “who has warned you to flee from the wrath that is to come.” Those who sent Jesus into the hands of the Romans said “his blood be upon us and our children.” The parable of the vineyard asked the question “when the lord of the vineyard comes what will he do unto those husbandmen?” Matthew 23:36 once again says the blood of all the prophets was on that generation and right before the passage addressing the times of the end in Matt 24 you have the parable of the two sons, parable of the vineyard and parable of the wedding feast. This is all a warning of judgement to come on that generation. Gods judgement on that generation was always in focus. Why then does this get so muddied? Eusebius claimed what was written actually took place. I’m not a scholar but if all of that isn’t the case it looks an awful lot like it is. There is obviously still scripture yet to be completed but until the time of the Gentiles is complete the new covenant dictates our response to this event. The branches of the tree are not to be arrogant but should take Gods judgement on idolatrous religion seriously seeking to serve him and flee from every stain that pollutes the garment. We are not exempt from Gods judgement should we act in the same way. Both wheat and tares are grown together until the harvest. Whoever comes to Christ does not need to fear the judgement but rests in his eternal rest. Context does indeed matter.
@BoutTimeProphecy15 сағат бұрын
“This generation” is an allusion to the quality of people.
@spiritandflesh84779 сағат бұрын
@ that doesn’t work with the text as “this generation” is used multiple times, in multiple places always with the religious class of his day in view.
@BoutTimeProphecy8 сағат бұрын
@@spiritandflesh8477 he’s describing the quality of people in the religious class of his time, which has been around since the beginning and will be around until his return. “This generation” is like “these guys.” Mark 9:19 Mat 17:17 Luke 9:41 Mat 12:39 Mat 6:4 Mat 12:45 Are just a tiny fraction of the “generation” references Jesus is alluding to. It’s almost always about the quality of people, not the timing, though it can be about both. He however never says he’s a part of this generation or describes his followers as such either.
@systematicimmorality16 сағат бұрын
We indeed don't have to reinvent the wheel, we simply need to keep the Ten Commandments and all the attendant civil laws that are associated with them upholding them. For instance, you shall not bear false witness comes with penalties to those who do bear false witness against someone and if we don't uphold those penalties to anyone involved, there is not justice, only tyranny. For instance, prosecutors can bring false testimony, evidence, and withhold exculpatory evidence to a Grand Jury and when it is found out, there are no punishments for it. This thus give too much power to prosecutors and it is no wonder they joke they can indict a ham sandwich. Read all about this in Systematic Immorality and the Failure of the MAGA Movement.
@tomgunn800418 сағат бұрын
You're reading from the Book of The First Bag of Balognians! Trust in Jesus!
@joesousa848119 сағат бұрын
Regardless of the medium, the Bible lays out clear rules of engagement. Up until this point, there is no excuse for the way a lot of this has taken place. These conversations need to come off of the socials and out of the public eye, and there needs to be reconciliation, humble apologies, and private debates and discussions on these things that are causing these brother wars. I understand that it is out in the open and public now, but like you said, there needs to be a few men that will step up in humility and lead the charge to fight for unity in the midst of differences. Praise God, because a lot of these things have taken place in the public square, and we have seen how a lot of these things should not be handled, and that is helpful in the local context when these types of situations occur in our own churches. I'm also not saying that there is not a place for certain public discussions, debates, and differences to be aired, such as the significance and relevance of the Antioch declaration. I am just saying from the perspective of a public observer that a lot of things are worded because they are said in public with the purpose of self-defense or correction.
@Lutheran-disguised-as-baptist20 сағат бұрын
the problem with dispi, is that they don't read Luke. Luke says the kingdom is not physical (luke 17:20-21) likewise Luke actually clarifies what Matthew wrote. If they would but read... It's a heretical system, but you can obviously be saved apart from it. The system must go
@aaronwalcott5136 сағат бұрын
John 18:36 "my kingdom is not of this world." It is in fact a physical kingdom, but not one created by man (tainted by sin and subject to the Curse, i.e. 2nd law of thermodynamics) but it is an everlasting kingdom. It will be set up on earth after the events of the Great Tribulation, otherwise (and this is important) God the Father would be a liar. Yet "let God be true, and every man a liar." Rom 3:4 So, you either take God (Revelation and Daniel and all the kingdom prophecies) at His word, or you think you know better than Him. Fair warning, expect the ultimatum detailed in Revelation 22 to be your portion, if you know better than He does.
@anthonyg505521 сағат бұрын
I enjoyed the short video. It was definitely encouraging. My wife and I did go to a Jesus and politics conference a few years ago. It was excellent and I enjoyed It. Jon Harris is by far my favorite out there right now. He’s measured precise and very mature biblically. He doesn’t have a big head. AD is the man! I still enjoy the G3 guys as well.
@YARDMAN-g6h21 сағат бұрын
Well done brother.
@eschatology_matters17 сағат бұрын
Thanks!
@kvelez22 сағат бұрын
That Dispensensationalism is what makes people reject that Echatological Framework
@Adam-l7t23 сағат бұрын
Thanks for responding to the all hands on deck situation. We need pacemakers especially those who will labor towards peacemaking with bridge-burning fathers in the faith. We have to do better. Thanks for heeding the call. Loved this video.
@genebaker696423 сағат бұрын
There is a rather concrete example of discounting Preterism when looking at history in combination with Luke 19:43-44 and Matt 24:15. Its rather amusing that Preterists who usually know more about 1st century history than anyone else somehow miss a major problem. With the Preterist view Jesus gives very bad advice in Matt 24:15. Jesus says, “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.” But this doesn’t work with the writings of Josephus nor Luke 19:43-44. This means you don’t need to flee until the city is surrounded; the land around the city is cleared; and worse of all a garrisoned siege wall is built around the entire city. How do you flee? Also, the temple mount still hasn’t been taken. Jesus even specifically mentions this siege wall in Luke 19:43-44. This is very clear in ESV, CSB and NASB translations. Other translations mess up making it difficult to know what is going on. It clear that about half of Luke 21 is historical and most of Matt 24 is future (to us) otherwise you have Jesus telling people to flee at two different times. In Luke you flee immediately, whereas in Matt 24 you don’t flee until after the abomination of desolation, which requires the possession of the temple mount. Preterism doesn’t work.
@francsiscogКүн бұрын
You move on when the offense stops. I don't know that it has.
@Randy_CoxКүн бұрын
Heretics gotta heretic. Daniel 11:31 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate. This is the unmodified and unchanged Word of God. These heretics change what ever words they want to fit what there itching ears want to hear. There is only one sanctuary and that is the Holy of holies inside the Jewish temple. Your not a Jewish temple, you do not have a holy place inside you.😂😂 This whole passage and prophecy was given to Jewish people, about the Jewish people. Only a replacement theology person can remove all the words of the Bible to make it something else. Has God thus said? Satan has used the same devices to generation after generation and those who like Eve decide they can interpret God's word there own way, fall into perdition.
@noxvenitКүн бұрын
Cultural differences are more crucial than a lot of people seem to understand. Both my wife are I are Texans. But I am hispanic (from a spanish speaking family0 grew up in south Texas (San Antonio); but my wife is of scottish descent, grew up in north Texas (Dallas area). She grew up Lutheran; I grew up Roman Catholic. (We are both PCA now, since 1994.) We have been married over 30 years, but we can have clashes of civilizations at the drop of a hat sometimes, and our ancestors have been in this country for centuries. Assimilation -- ethnogenesis -- do not happen overnight, or even or decades in some cases, even sharing a common faith.
@michaelblanks4284Күн бұрын
I used to listen to James White I find him frightfully boring but I love almost all of the reform guys but there's one thing about James White he seems to look for a fight and for trouble and he goes around the back side of the mountain and kind of pot shots and does the drive-by shooting rather than talking to the person first now this is probably my first post about James White so I don't pick on him but I listen to all the reform guys but he is the one that keeps coming up with a looking for trouble he didn't seem to be a peacemaker cuz some of these guys agree they have differences theologically but almost all of them agree that we have a goal in mind to make a world a better place until he returns
@johnnyjohnsonston2581Күн бұрын
This is a very logical and mature take on the situation IMO. Thanks for speaking up
@TruttleКүн бұрын
I pray that the "it didn't have to be this way" camp will prevail and make it not that way anymore. We can just be normal guys, actually.
@capostonКүн бұрын
Did Jesus throw Titus alive into the lake of fire at his coming in 70 AD??? 2 Thessalonians 2 Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, 2 not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by the teaching allegedly from us-whether by a prophecy or by word of mouth or by letter-asserting that the day of the Lord has already come. 3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness[a] is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. 5 Don’t you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things? 6 And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. 7 For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. 9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. 11 For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 12 and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness. The point: This lawless One (Antichrist) must appear before Jesus returns. The lawless one sets himself up in the temple proclaiming himself up as God. It is Christ who destroys the lawless one at his coming. Christ did not throw Titus alive into the lake of fire at his coming because... 1. Christ has not returned 2. Titus was not the lawless one 3. This is an event yet to happen Revelation 19:19-21 19 Then I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies gathered together to wage war against the rider on the horse and his army. 20 But the beast was captured, and with it the false prophet who had performed the signs on its behalf. With these signs he had deluded those who had received the mark of the beast and worshiped its image. The two of them were thrown alive into the fiery lake of burning sulfur. 21 The rest were killed with the sword coming out of the mouth of the rider on the horse, and all the birds gorged themselves on their flesh.
@justingentry8522 сағат бұрын
The man of sin in Thessalonians is not the same entity as what Daniel writes of.
@aaronwalcott5136 сағат бұрын
@caposton Well, at least one person can read Scripture and understand. I'm encouraged to see common sense blended with rightly dividing the Word of Truth.
@3BadBostonsКүн бұрын
the AoD is when AI links up with the human conscioesness , 70 AD was just a type of the AoD to come. Believe it or not, I have told you what I know. Don't you know that you are the temple of the Holy Spirit?
@ChrisRoutsonКүн бұрын
I love this song!!! Please let us know more about the confrence in Indiana and when. We belong to a church plant maybe they could come
@eschatology_matters17 сағат бұрын
The song is I Know My Redeemer Lives by Tim Bushong, the conference is Jesus and Politics. You can find it on FB or follow us on X or FB and we'll keep you posted!
@johndupre5223Күн бұрын
Where I would disagree with you is on Matt 24:36-50. Here Jesus transitioning to a different subject that I see as His second coming. Whereas in verses 3-35 He gave clear signs on what to look for and what to do because this would be an event soon to take place by the Roman army, verse 36 he speaks of “That day” and some I have read that the term “That day” or “The Day’ can speak of is second coming. And there are no signs to warn the listener of the pending doom. And when He comes again there will be nowhere to hide. To me Jesus is speaking of 2 separate events.
@systematicimmoralityКүн бұрын
I don't know what the "definition" of Christian Nationalism is, but I know what the definition of Christian Reconstruction is. Can anyone tell what the difference might be? I can say this, the best book that is too easy to read and is totally practical and addresses some issues even Christian Reconstructionist miss and boy is this a book that will whip Christians with a Christian Nationalism/Christian Reconstruction mindset. The book is Systematic Immorality and the Failure of the MAGA Movement (And God's Subsequent Judgement Upon America). This is a MUST read.
@michaelmartin5995Күн бұрын
Dispensationalism is stage 10 cancer on the true Body of Christ. I love John MacArthur, but disagree with him on these ideas.
@rbstudios3433Күн бұрын
Nerd Wars!!!
@lukebenner9860Күн бұрын
So you are saying that we didn't see the AofD in the holy place but by the East gate. Cool cool. I guess it didn't happen then. Not to mention that it would be way too late to run at that point.
@lukebenner9860Күн бұрын
So you are saying that we didn't see the AofD in the holy place but by the East gate. Cool cool. I guess it didn't happen then. Not to mention that it would be way too late to run at that point.
@LyleGriffith-be2xmКүн бұрын
I live in Oklahoma. I look at what bills are before the senate to judge the life of Christian nationalism. Removal of dei, Bible's in the classroom, toughest abortion in the country. Yes my leaders are leading with Christ in mind. On a national level, I see the same thing happening. Christian Nationalism is very alive.
@Vincent-vv8wqКүн бұрын
that intro was absolutely bonkers, even more bonkers if you live in the states and talk to almost any evengelical they will tell you something wild about this.
@theol64Күн бұрын
Concerning Matt 16:28... Due only to a recent conversation, when did Christ "come in his kingdom"?
@Robert.WilliamsКүн бұрын
@theol64 first, he came into his kingdom ("reign", not to be confused with palace or the like; see Strong's) when he ascended to heaven. Second, when Jesus said they would see the Son of Man coming on the clouds, it's idiomatic of coming in judgement. I'm not just making this up. The OT has loads of passages where God rides the clouds. Here are just two of them: lsaiah 19:1-Behold, the Lord is riding on a swift cloud and is about to come to Egypt; The idols of Egypt will tremble at His presence, And the heart of the Egyptians will melt within them. Deuteronomy 33:26-There is none like the God of Jeshurun, who rides the heavens to your help, and through the skies in His majesty. No one saw God riding a cloud. And how did God often judge a nation? By using other nations. Here's one example: Isaiah 10:5-6-Woe to Assyria, the rod of My anger And the staff in whose hands is My indignation, I send it against a godless nation And commission it against the people of My fury To capture spoils and to seize plunder, And to trample them down like mud in the streets. Jesus was not only clear that the generation of his disciples would not pass until all these things took place (which Rome was used to carry out said destruction), but he lets his disciples know that it wouldn't be the Father carrying out the judgment.... It would be Jesus himself: John 5:27-and [the Father] gave Him authority to execute judgment, because He is the Son of Man. Hope this helps you out.
@JglassminКүн бұрын
@@theol64 Hey so the verse preceding says that “For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds.” So once again the context is judgement. While yes it is typological of a future judgement at the return of Christ. In this context I believe it is referring to the judgment on Jerusalem due to the time constraints. He says ““Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” He says some of you who are standing here. So the event had to have taken place during their lifetime just as Matt 24 states “this generation”. We have similar statements in Matt 26:64 when he says to the high priest “Jesus said to him, “You have said it yourself; nevertheless I tell you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven.” He specifically says “You” Then again in mark 8:38 “For whoever is ashamed of Me and My words in this adulterous and sinful generation, the Son of Man will also be ashamed of him when He comes in the glory of His Father with the holy angels.” He says “this generation” Another possible interpretation would be that “come in his kingdom” would refer to the ascension and that the coming is coming on the clouds up to the ancient of days as referenced in Daniel 7 which also could work due to it occurring in that generation. Yet I think the coming in judgement makes most sense of all the verses about the son of man “coming” because he extends those who will “see” to people such as the high priest and those questioning him, which as far as we know did not see the ascension but most likely did see the destruction/judgment of Jerusalem. With all that being said what I am most confident about is that whatever the “coming in his kingdom” referred to, it must have happened during that generation. Hope this answers your question
@JglassminКүн бұрын
@@Robert.Williams I think you answered this well brother!
@Robert.WilliamsКүн бұрын
@Jglassmin I appreciate you saying so.
@Robert.Williams2 сағат бұрын
@Jglassmin can you still see that comment? It doesn't show up on my end....
@rj_corvoКүн бұрын
The far-fetched and broad spectrum of ideas for the AoD in the introduction of this stream was insane 😂
@JglassminКүн бұрын
Right 😂 and trust me this was only like 1% of all the videos I watched preparing for the video.
@rj_corvoКүн бұрын
@Jglassmin you definitely took one for the team lol
@JglassminКүн бұрын
@@rj_corvo😂😂😂 I’ll be waiting for my Purple Heart to come in the mail.
@rj_corvoКүн бұрын
@@Jglassmin we already got that heart BEFORE we even thought to look into this stuff. It's that new heart David spoke of. 😉 In other words, you got your reward, now do the work! 😂
@BROsFishingAustriaКүн бұрын
"We need to sort out the rules of engagement"... well, Christ sorted them out in his Book, didn't he? AD Robles for example really needs to take a course on the rules that Christ sorted out "for this playground"... kindness in disagreement, fairness in portraying the other side, etc is really missing in his camp.
@chrismachin2166Күн бұрын
No reply to my last post to explain my error of thought?
@eschatology_matters16 сағат бұрын
Sorry brother, I forgot about that thread. My only answer would be, I can't answer for Joel.
@chrismachin216613 сағат бұрын
@@eschatology_mattersI totally agree you can’t answer for Joel,but if you were in his position what would you do? I know it’s only a hypothetical question,but I would be interested with your answer.
@eschatology_matters7 сағат бұрын
It would solely depend on the nature of the thing I was doing. For instance, Ive thought about training young men with practical steps to engage and participate in local politics and hold office ect. The entire goal of this would be to have an explicitly christian government from the ground up. But if a mornon was able to train these men on how to fill out paperwork or run a successful local campaign, i might consider using them if no one else is available. I feel this is being "wise as serpents"
@chrismachin21665 сағат бұрын
@ Thanks for your considered reply.
@CarryTheCrossКүн бұрын
The visible church is a mess, it's toxic and needs a shot of humility someplace.
@FlyingGentileКүн бұрын
Thanks for giving Myles an outlet! Great Vid.
@mOYNTdnbzsoКүн бұрын
2Ti 2:24 And the Lord's servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, 2Ti 2:25 correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth, I think the gentleness is getting neglected as of late. More heat than light is being generated in these Twitter/KZbin/Etc. wars. I just stand far enough back where I can make use of the light without feeling the heat.
@theMolluskManКүн бұрын
This is the biblical, measured, and objective response to the situation that we have been needing.
@eschatology_mattersКүн бұрын
That's encouraging, ty!
@ausonius100Күн бұрын
Post-mil seems a fleshy pot of granpa nonsense! Taking pride in young striding proteges and cute crying grandchildren. Sounds eerily like a "days of Noah" kind of thing: "For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark. And they were oblivious until the flood came and swept them all away. So will it be at the coming of the Son of Man" (Matt 24).
@ronl514Күн бұрын
The problem with Covenant (Theology) paedobaptists is that they arrange the New Covenant as if it were the Old Covenant, so that there is really nothing "NEW" about it save the inclusion of gentiles.
@BirdieSenpaiКүн бұрын
This is one of the reasons I became convinced of paedobaptist covenant theology after having been a lifelong Baptist. I finally understand what Paul Washer meant when he joked that Presbyterians are Reformed Baptists who can read. Incredibly grateful for Brian Sauvé and his fantastic work!
@googIesuxКүн бұрын
100% agreed on all points. Are we brothers in the faith or no? Whose church is it anyway? God leads the operation, and He is not aloof or absent. We have hope in Him, who is our reason to begin with; He's always working. Fast + pray for unity and revival. Stand between the fool and God and pray in hope for grace and humility.
@joplanjaniceКүн бұрын
Did all the tribes of the earth mourn in 70 AD?
@KyleCombesКүн бұрын
So what are we supposed to say when Brian makes excellent points that are very difficult to refute, but they disagree with what we were first taught? Oh ya! Hey Nazi! 😅
@stuffipost137Күн бұрын
I'll watch this later. Brian has proved himself an unreliable and disgusting human, whose very claim of salvation is to be questioned, but there may be some valuable info here. I pray everyone of you stops lying, admit you have an undying hatred for people based on their "tribe," repent and be saved. Until that happens, you are to be trusted like a fish sandwich from a lunchroom vending machine. What you get may or may not kill you.
@frosty1947Күн бұрын
what did he do wrong? i genuinely don’t know anything about this guy
@bradgetz11 сағат бұрын
What this guy is saying is why I switched from the baptistic type church I was raised in to become Presbyterian. I not only baptized my kids, I let them take communion. I taught them to love the Lord and follow him as they grew. All four kids are grown with families of their own. All of them are faithful Christians. No regrets.
@frosty19479 сағат бұрын
@@bradgetz i don’t think that’s what he’s saying at all my friend. I’m very happy for you and your family! But the guy I was responding to was saying he’s unreliable and disgusting and hates people, and I genuinely want to know what he did wrong because the info he gave in this video was very good and dispelled straw man arguments about reformed believers treating their kids like pagans
@austinrenshaw90507 сағат бұрын
@@frosty1947I'm not willing to say he's not a Christian or regenerate but he's said several questionable things and has aligned himself with openly antisemitic people specifically stone choir.