Tim Keller wasn't the best example to use for sure.

Sounds like Ceaser has infiltrated the SBC.

One world religion temple has been built awaiting the arrival of the apostates

In reality, truly biblical dispensationalism (not the sensational minority non-dispensationalists love to point to as the mainstream [ hint hint, it's not]) is nowhere near dead and is still the prominent Eschatology. Usually those in this camp love to gaslight viewers and listeners with this but fortunately it's not the reality. As a professor of hermeneutics, this abandonment of solid biblical teach is sad to see in evangelical schools and churches (mostly reformed) and is and will damage many believers spiritual growth and evangelism.

Bahnsen is a boss

What is the obsession w Blood and Soil? We are headed for a dark place if these fascists get their way.

These ideas are not Christian and definitely not American. Also, why is the GOP going to Hungary all the time?

So lets redefine what a fixed number of years “really” means to fit our eschatology.😂

Stephen Wolfe lauds the first hundred years of Puritanism. However, another Puritan, Roger Williams, saw that Puritanism was treading on the conscience. Wolfe is destroying the separation of church and state. Persecution will follow. He's advocating for the medieval church. And doing it with kindness. His idea is incredibly dangerous to freedom of conscience.

Yes

1 Peter 5: 8 Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.

Too many people think playing footsies with Hitlerites is what the cool kids are doing.

If an individual starts thinking Hitler was not that bad, they have swallowed pagan propaganda, not just questioned a consensus.

Lets go! Post-Mil Dad!😊

Very encouraging, ty brother

Thank you. One thing that stood out to me in this chapter was the king "bound" (3:24) them but in the fire with Christ, they were "unbound" (3:25). Before Christ we are prisoners to satan's power, bound by sin before receiving salvation. At salvation we are set free. You showed me things I really hadn't thought about. When looking for strength in trials I never went to Daniel. Now I can be reminded from this chapter. Looking forward to Chap 4!

For the life of me, I will never understand how seemingly learned individuals can still perpetuate the lie that Dispensationalism did not exist until Darby. For those individuals, I recommend the following books: "Dispensationalism Before Darby," by William C. Watson "Ancient Dispensational Truth," by James C. Morris This lie that Dispensationalism did not exist before Darby is EASILY debunked.

The reason that people turned away from Amil and Postmil views is because Jesus' own words make these positions Biblically untenable. In Matthew 19:28 and 25:31-34, Jesus declares that He will assume His glorious Davidic throne and reign over Israel IN THE REGENERATION - this takes place at the time of His bodily second coming when He comes in glory and with all of the angels with Him, at the time of the sheep and the goats judgment when He will judge the nations of the earth, separating believers from unbelievers, AND NOT BEFORE (Cf. Luke 1:32-33, 2 Samuel 7:12-13, 17, Isaiah 9:7, Revelation 3:21). This truth alone makes amillennialism and postmillennialism impossible since both of these positions assert that Jesus is NOW reigning from the Davidic throne in His millennial kingdom in this age, and of course, according to Jesus' own words, He isn't. Not yet.

My criticism of Amillennialism is that it is too vague. However, I believe we are to identify specifics. For example, the first coming of the Lord had specific prophecies that were to be looked for. Signs such as the Lord’s place of birth, his ministry, death etc. Following the Babylonian captivity the Jews were to listen out specifically for king Cyrus as their liberator: this would have required action on their part by way of prayer and preparedness. The Lord taught the disciples to watch specifically for the Roman soldiers surrounding Jerusalem, in which they were to flee specifically to the mountains. Consequently as per Revelation 13&17, I believe the heads of the beast from the sea can be specifically identified. BIBLICAL HISTORY 1-Egypt 2-Assyria 3-Babylon 4-Medo-Persia 5-Greece 6-Rome POST BIBLICAL HISTORY 7-Great Britain 8-America I’ve also broken them down as coming from the sons of Noah. Ham-1,2,3 Shem-4 Japheth-5,6,7,8 Respecting antichrist we are taught that he will be revealed. As an infant, Christ was revealed to the shepherds and others. But it was not until John the Baptist that Christ was publicly revealed. I believe there is a parallel respecting antichrist. Some of the Lord’s people will know of antichrist before he is revealed publicly as per 2 Thessalonians. One error is preachers misquoting the number “Six-hundred-and-sixty-six”, by saying, “six, six, six”. Thus moving from specific to vagueness. Yet if we search the scriptures we will find other references to the number “Six-hundred-and-sixty-six”, which in turn sheds light on Revelation 13. Watchmen on the wall of the city are watching for specifics. The same is true for the Churches watchmen. Your brother in Christ.

Return to your first love!

Postmil and amil unity!

Our God is able but even if not: they’re saying it’s because God chooses not to, not that He has failed. They will defend God to the end.

The Great commission was given to the first century apostles and believers, which was fulfilled at the end.....70 ad.

😂question history is to question God. That is rich.. You see kids, you need one authoritative interpreter.

Hello all, I guess I’m here to throw cold water on all the allegorical arguments I see. My name is Hal Bachman, and I’m working on a 2.5 year thesis focusing on the first three centuries of theology as well as end times. While the patristic church fathers were not Dispensationalist, they were very close. Iranaeus stated that his opponents were ignorant because they did not understand the “dispensations” that God has divinely placed throughout the ages. Eusebius, the father of church history was categorically pre-trib. To somewhere around 95%, the vast majority of patristic fathers were outspokenly LITERAL in their eschatology. The two dissenters were Origen and Jerome. A later church father stated that Origen’s works had clearly been tampered with. As for Jerome, he “published” a redacted version of Victorinus’s Revelation commentary that removed all the literal comments. As a scholar of this time, I am telling that there is no way this allegorical Revelation commentary is legitimate. Jerome stood head and shoulders above another scholars of the day. To say that his “scholarly” redaction was simply removing about 6-7 paragraphs and replacing them with briefer fluff does not fly. Jerome had the same spirit as Luther, and regularly hammered and insulted his opponents and displayed very intricate knowledge of the Scriptures. All to say, the literal view was the FIRST view of Christianity for three centuries until Rome took over. JND merely rediscovered what Papias, Irenaeus, Victorinus, Tertullian, and a large list of other patristic church fathers has written 1500 years before he was born. Pick up a history book. Love, Hal

My three best books other than the Bible: Foxe's Book of Martyrs, The Pilgrim’s Progress John Bunyan, and THE BLOUDY TENENT OF PERSECUTION Roger Williams

I now know that smoke smells.

Thank you, I really appreciate this analysis

Have Platt and his replacement ever repented for splitting the church?

Thank you for sharing this info.

One sentence summary of the bible: I am God and you are not. Dualism runs deep in Christianity.

Good word. Dispensationalism and pietism has done much to destroy the Church but it is not the root. The root is Soul Liberty which spawned the establishment clause of the First Amendment. It was the rejection of our forefather of the Solemn League and Covenant and its principles for freedom of religion.

At around 22:00 my guy questions what a "strong political will" looks like... and I'm like, dude, have you not observed the execution of the gay agenda ober the past few decades by less than 5% of the population???

There were no strawman fallacies. Anyone who claims world War 2 villain is Churchill while hitler is a mere helpless good intentioned victim is either delusional or ignorant or at best evil relativist. Irrespective of the objections and misgivings, hitler was clearly the aggressor and evil driving force in that war. Since when did Christians perceive evil as relative? Folks dont Tucker carlson is not the gospel. Our brains need to function

James white is correct. If you think christians are called to be crusaders, younare not getting that view from scripture but someone else

Somebody needs to have a debate with these guys who "doubt" the holocaust narrative, because listening to the Zoom call blows the narrative put up by Joel Webbon out of the water.

Excellent lesson on Dispensationalism that hit all the right key points in 20 min. It is always a joy to hear people realize that Dispensationalism just does not add up (on so many levels) and dig deeper to understand why. Glory to Almighty God and Lord Jesus Christ!

I've been waiting eighteen months for the public discourse to address the errors in Stephen's doctrine in a proper and elucidative manner; this is the first time I've seen it happen; thank you brothers for it (though I also suggest this has come long overdue). Those with some public influence, who've found his doctrine to be repulsive (I mean literally that it drives them away), have been arguing by assuming their conclusion rather than by articulating actual argumentation. I am highly relieved to see this livestream which simply lays out the facts plainly for consideration. I agree with Dr White, but he says nothing to help prove to the CN movement that they are in error, rather he assumes the conclusion as if the argumentation goes without saying (which it should, but it obviously doesn't). I have a harsher take than yall, regarding Stephen's propaganda (by "propaganda", I mean that which propagates an idea and/or cause; I don't mean to imply propaganda must be a bad thing; I am a propagandist for the Gospel, and I am honored to so be). However, I would be glad to discover that I am wrong about Stephen's intent, and that all he has needed is some loving brothers to elucidate how grave his error is. In fact, I don't care about what one man believes, but my concern is that thousands of Reformed men are united in failing to offer him correction; at that point, they have failed to be Reformed. I was never offended that yall had Stephen on, but I was concerned. My concerns have been put to rest. If yall are going to be needfully productive like this, yall can have him on every other day and I'll be happy for it. I was originally down to put my support behind the CN movement, then Stephen tweeted that a revival is not necessary to Christianize a nation. I spoke up to ask AD and Jon to offer Stephen loving correction, but instead they covered for his errors and refused to help him. The whole matter is so obvious, that I cannot help but be suspicious that some of the key players in the CN movement may be Marxist infiltrators deliberately corrupting the Visible Church (by "Visible Church", I mean those church institutions which are reformed to the Five Solas and God's Soteriology Of Grace). There are specific reasons I an suspicious in this manner, but I'm not here to distract from yall's productive discussion by presenting argumentation for that, I'm just offering my sincerity in order to share myself as an anecdotal example of the need for this topic to be addressed in a productive manner (and I will be exceedingly glad if I am proven wrong on this point). I think it is fair that if men don't want to be seen as potential infiltrators, then they need to not present themselves as hellbent on propagating the setting aside of Gospel and Bible, because such propagation is a prime objective of the Marxists. Is it not a fair ask that Reformed men refuse to cast aside Gospel and Bible? I am confident it is a fair ask. It is all I ask. I just ask that the masses of Reformed men agree in offering Stephen loving correction; I don't ask anyone to share my suspicions regarding him and others, just that Reformed men behave like Reformed men.

For me, natural law falls apart at the fact that God has established His law. I don't need to go into my own assessment of the matter as if I am wise enough to judge law in place of God, because I'm not, and because God is trustworthy that we owe to submit to His law (in which submission we know our failure, and therefore submit unto the purpose of the law, which is the Good News that the law is fulfilled in Christ Iesus in order that He may save many alive).

Premillennialism is not exclusive to dispensationalism, although the dispensationalists do characterize the millennium in an unscriptural way. Dispensational eschatology is, in large part, a popular myth built upon an irrational interpretation of scripture (starting with a distortion of Daniel 9 in particular). However, a premillennial return of Christ is, itself, entirely scriptural. One cannot come away from reading Revelation with any other conclusion: In Revelation 5:10, the 24 elders, which figuratively represent the prayers and expectations of the saints who, at that point in the narrative have not yet been, but will be, gathered by Christ at his arrival which coincides with the start of the outpouring of the wrath of God in 16:1, declare that they as priests and kings will reign on the earth. In Revelation 20:4, those, at which point in the narrative, having been resurrected by Christ at his second coming and described as being both those having endured in their faith unto death as well as those having endured _until the conclusion of the tribulation_ without having worshipped the beast or his image or taken the mark, are said to thereafter live and reign with Christ a thousand years. Clearly then, these saints, _after they are gathered by Christ at his second coming_ , will reign with Christ on earth during the stated 1,000 years.

Splendid work. Blessed be God for it.

Dont you think its just simple? As Christian we should allow God to work through us. Overcoming evil with good. Whether its in the government or church doing good can only produce good. I dont think Jesus separates as man does. Just do good...and let it produce more good.

Jesus was the final sacrificial lamb. Thats why He came and died. NOT TO SET UP A POLITICAL KINGDOM

Jesus said MY KINGDOM IS NOT OF THIS WORLD

Super great message!! Thank you! Have you ever listened to Padtor Chuck Baldwin . You will love his teachings they agree with yours

Where can I find the music that is played at the opening of the show?

The Lord's saying about His kingdom not being of this world, refers top the fact that His scepter of authority is His sinless righteousness, not His ability to overpower. He is exceedingly able to overpower all, but a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of His kingdom. The display of His virtue upon the cross of God's love, is the culmination of His demonstration of His omnirighteousness; therefore, in context to Pilot, Lord Iesus was making reference to His coming death as being His conquest of the world (this is also why His kingdom was said to be at hand, because He ascended to the throne a mere forty days after He raised from the dead). By proclaiming the Good News Of Messiah And Him Having Been Crucified, we are therein being used by God as instruments of conveying the reality of that conquest to our fellow humans. Who is he who has conquered the world, if not he who believes that Iesus is the Son Of God? In all adversities, we are exceedingly victorious in conquest through Messiah who loved us and died for us.

Why does anyone even remotely like Stephen Wolfe? Seriously, is just because this dude is a supposed conservative we have to accept him? We need to say no thanks to anyone who advocates statism, “conservative” or liberal.

Doug Wilson is a very sick human