Это, образно говоря, МиГ-29 и Су-27 в одном бокале. Все три непревзойдённых монстра родились в далёком 1977(76)

Thank you. This is fantastic.

I'm looking forward to this vid. I have a Moog Sub Phatty and an Arturia Matrix Brute which are both very cool. I did have a Roland SH1000 in the 80s - and had a lot of fun with it

Well done pal 👍

I had NO idea most of these had been done on a CS80! Whoa! Crazy!

1:27 and 2:35 - that’s the preset Shep Pettibone and Madonna used for Thief of Hearts!

In ghe Live at Pompeii film Roger Waters seems to be using THIS synth but with an external keyboard, not this blue and black one. Is it oossible to hook a keyboard up to it?

4:31 'Parliament' does NOT look like that 👎👎

Wonderful video! Thank you!!! Would love to see you do more vids that focus on recreating famous or usable musical synth patches!

I thought I finally fixed the problem...until when I went to the microphone at the top of my mac it was already on standard...and still not working. Very frustrating as I've never delt with this. I'm on a new mac and this is absolute crap.

Superb video! Personally, for me, its the Yamaha CS-5 but I haven't tried most of these!

Fail. MFB Dominion-1 should absolutely be in there… Three VCO Monster with more filter types than any other mono.

Cool

Sequential Circuits Pro One, Korg MS2000 & just maybe Roland JP-8000. Nice video, thanks !

On the run <3

Roland SE-01!!!

Throw out the oberheim and the Yamaha and add the mighty Prophet one and amazing OSC Oscar .

I would have included the MS-20 and Pro One. Also one of the other classic Roland analogs such as SH-5, System 100 Model 101 or SH-2. Cheers

Cool sounds and a great selection.... but an SH1000 over a SCI Pro-One? Really? Thanks for the cool vid!

The SE1 is highly disappointing. Too much menu diving for a synth with loads of dials. Envelopes not that snappy either. The box doesn't weigh anything either, so probably SMD design.

As if anybody in the entire would ever like sh1000 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

If that SOB had stolen my 106 … … … Wow …

At least im much cooler

The SEX1 is a minimoog copy. does not belong on this list. even though it is fabulously well done. the pro1 and korg ms20 do belong as most here suggest.

I was beginning to question your sanity, with inclusions like the SH-1000 and CS-40M … but you redeemed yourself somewhat with the top 4 … Some wasted spaces on that list, but this is really the Top 10 Analog Monosynths That You Own, so fair enough.

i'm after moding my odyssey FS to make it modular (add a box behind it with connections; check the switches and how the 2600 is designed, then you'll get that it's not to much of a complex task if you go to the switches for patch points), the ttsh is the same width as the ody, and imo, for reasons explainerd here, i think you'de go way further with a modular modded ody combined to a 2600 than with two 2600's for some reasons explained here about the ody (sync mainly but the lfo too, and the ody FS has three filter types in it...). I had a voyager at one time, didnt like it for my style of music, it's too sweet and too full, and thus not great to fit in the mix but that's me (i saw Marinelli and the Chromeo guy say not far from the same thing, they still own a minimmog but i'm not a californian superstar...), the older one sounds a bit more agressive though (i think). You presented three synths with a same circuit architecture, so to the contrary you seem to love it . i regret selling the voyager 12 years ago though; when i see how much they are sold in nowadays (but do they go for 4k5? There's this guy i forgot the name and the country, eastern europe, he builds minimoogs for 2k brand new), but a guy playing live to crowds will want the memory though. mine was an electric blue, and when you'd put the lights up it would bring a bunch of noise (if it would of distorted... never mind lol). that was fun to watch. thx a lot.

Having owned a CS-40M, I can assure you, it shouldn't be on any top 10 list, other than biggest synthesizers ever.

Does it need more of a slow attack?

What were the custom buttons for?

I have only one thing to say ... OSCar ... and thanks for this great video!

D Train 😎

Great list and I concur - ALTHOUGH - I'd put the ProONE in place of the AKS. It's more playable and musical - even though I'm a huge Roxy fan.

Good stuff! Well done.

Moog is pronounced like "rogue", couldn't help myself.

You can't put a price on perfection

I heard maybe £50.000

Legendary machine time by elo great album

Pro One?

My favourite after the original Minimoog is the Multimoog ❤ Simply unique and super wild and crazy sounding. Btw, nothing wrong with SE1 the original. Pro-One is awesome. SH-101 or MC-202. I've actually owned all the synth you mention from the 1980's on and so I've actually have used them all and still own most of them IMHO

I guess all these sounds in the original songs were not all made on a Mini Moog originally, but are done here to demonstrate the difference between the two different issues of the Mini Moog? For example Abbas "Gimme, Gimme, Gimme" lead was made on an Arp Odyssey, Howard Jones didn't use the Mini Moog on his first albums, Europes "The Final Countdown" was made on a Roland JX8P, Harald Faltmeyer used some modular Roland System etc...

Important ones that u missed. Pro-One, MS-20 and Mono/Poly. Otherwise, great video! Comparisons is always fun!

That's a hard call , I probably would have slipped in the MS20 as a tie with the the SH101, knowing what I know about the MS20 now.

Come on Behringer, launch the VCS3 !!

Synthi wins in my book!

i would have gone for the CS30 rather than the CS40M. i know the CS30 is generally not rated highly because of the strange patch routing and some people accuse it of having a 'thin' sound but that's just not the case. i have owned one since the early 80's (cost me £50 with an amp and lead thrown in because it's owner couldn't get to grips with it). examples of it's 'stangeness' is that LFO provides the rate only, the wave shape for modulation is chosen at the destination consequently with one LFO it is possible to have different modulation shapes on any block, oscillator, filter or VCA. Modulation of the LFO from one of the (effectively) 5 envelope generators is possible. there is provision to create Notch (band reject) filtering. Also you get an 8 step sequencer. There is an unusual envelope generator which replaces the release level with an initial level and attack level there are 3 EG's which become 5 because two can be inverted. EG's are also chosen at the destination. VCO1 can be modulated with VCO2. Ring modulation for VCA2. . And the HP, BP, LP are chosen at VCA not on the filter block. It of course has limitations such as no synch. No dedicted triangle wave from the oscillators and you can only toggle between wave shapes at the oscillator, it would be nice to glide between the shapes but not every synth has every feature you may like, does it? It is also very reliable in terms of holding it's pitch and filter settings once it's warmed up unlike some other synths i won't mention. Also the sequencer can take a CV from the keyboard to change the key it's playing in but if you want to hold the key its playing there' s a switch to prevent the keyboard CV getting to the sequencer. Or it can run independently. And this is just the beginning of it's strangeness. Oh and a sine wave fundamental is provided at VCA1 where you can mix it with signals from filter 1 or 2. Sorry this is such a long comment but it is hard to explain it's uniqueness without going into a bit of detail. It has kept me amused for 40 years which can't be bad.

You should totally look into the Norand Mono. It has an LFO for every single frickin' knob and does INSANE sounds. Best mono I ever had, I wish Norand would do a poly as well.

the OB1 sounds amazing 👌

Always fun to look behind peoples collections. A few classics missing of course 🙂 and an SE1 wouldn't make my list - has a deep solid bottom but not quick to program and pretty generic in a lot of ways (A moog voyager sounds about the same but more sound design capable and a nice keyboard/interface.) As other mention, a Pro One has to be on any top 10 and an one of the Korg MS range. The SH2 is demonstrably better than an SH101 but i guess through influence you could say the 101 has had more influence. There are a couple of modern synths that could be up there and the one i would place at No 1 is the Cwejman S1 Mk2 - absolute pleasure. Anyway 10 is too few

The filter on the OB-1 is glorious.

Fascinating that you put the good 'ol AKS above the Minimoog.