Is the HMG not usable? It would have been far more suited for those APC's than the coax.
@dab_jab4049 күн бұрын
Are you going to cover the T-64B and the new missions?
@akkapamagaming9 күн бұрын
Not for a while, no. I hope to get back on GHPC soon but I'm currently struggling with some private issues that keep me from making new videos.
@nateweter401212 күн бұрын
Totally buying this during the Steam Summer Sale. I love the BMP-2 and this seems like a great game. The German on the intercom sounds fantastic.
@GJ20315 күн бұрын
That's not HEAT, that's sabot.
@akkapamagaming15 күн бұрын
The name of the game is "Gunner, HEAT, PC!" :)
@prometheus_tdd18 күн бұрын
That Roman legionary is just way to cute for its own food 😅
@Gracz8726 күн бұрын
It's not Abrams against soviet armor, but M68 gun, and it's original is british like also Abrams armor :P
@dprov1877Ай бұрын
the green dot by the range is the ready to fire indicator, if its not on your gun isnt loaded or the gun elevation or depression is too much. the gunner sight operates independently of the gun and should stay on target wither the gun has depression to follow it or not if the game is realistic.
@galactic-guyАй бұрын
12:45 might be a bit late to answer that question, but it's simply a difference in doctrin. NATO tanks like the M1 or the Leopards were made to defend against a soviet invasion. The Smoke canisters on those tanks are therefore made to cover a retreat. That's why the smoke forms a halve circle around the tank. Also the Commander launches the smoke which also shows that it's meant to protect and cover the tank. Soviet tanks, on the other hand, are meant for more aggressive offensive actions. The smoke is therefore launched by the gunner instead of the commander, which shows that the soviets see smoke as a weapon and not protection. Soviet smoke canisters, therefore, form a straight line in front of the Tank really far away in order to cover an advance and not a retreat! Launching the smoke just a few meters from the tank wouldn't cover a advance for very long as the tank quickly drives through the smoke. I'm usually not very good at explaining things so I hope it was somewhat understandable. Keep up the great work!
@akkapamagamingАй бұрын
Makes perfect sense, thanks so much for your information! Do you think the Soviet smoke is accurately represented in GHPC? Because I tend to find it quite useless to be honest. It launches really far away but only forms a relatively small smoke screen and if you turn left or right a little bit, you'll miss the screen entirely.
@galactic-guyАй бұрын
@@akkapamagaming to be honest, I'm not entirely sure how accurate it really is. The general idea and implementation definitely is there but even the smoke from the M1 doesn't appear to be entirely realistic. When looking at real videos, the smoke is a lot denser and also seems to last longer. The Problem is that comparing it to real videos doesn't tell you a lot since there are probably a number of different smoke canisters that all have been improved over the years, so differences are to be expected. So like I said, I can't tell you for certain if it's accurate or not but I think there's definitely room for improvement! Thank you so much for taking the time to read all the comments!
@adamtruong1759Ай бұрын
18:18 Oh wow, that HEAT shell really did not care about the turret armor on that T-72.
@katakansayaganteng8455Ай бұрын
31:11 always love this moment😂🔥
@matthewjones39Ай бұрын
Uh that’s all German armor
@quan-uo5ws20 күн бұрын
Designed and built in the Soviet Union.
@matthewjones3920 күн бұрын
@@quan-uo5ws So you’d call a Canadian Lepord 2 German?
@danmorgan3685Ай бұрын
In GHPC the T-55A is a tracked struggle bus.
@Vazc02 ай бұрын
I'm glad i found your channel! Looking forward to more awesome GHPC content!
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much, I'm happy to hear that!
@danmorgan36852 ай бұрын
The PT-76 was very much obsolete by the time period of this game. That gun is only good against the most lightly armored vehicles. On the NATO side that's the M113 and Bradley. Everything else can laugh off any short of a very lucky hit. When infantry get added this tank could be a menace to them. It's able to hang out of short range anti-tank weapon range (like the LAW) and just pummel infantry squads with frag rounds. That's not today.
@blakewoodal65782 ай бұрын
Great video can we get more please
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
You got it!
@blakewoodal65782 ай бұрын
Thanks
@batkhangai54462 ай бұрын
Fire video 🔥
@alex1234-th8jq2 ай бұрын
as a russain your intro could use a little work (laugauge wise) but i love the video in general keep it up :)
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Yeah, I figured. I don't speak any Russian myself and I don't know anyone who does so I had to stick with AI voice. I figured it was close enough since I could reverse translate the audio and still got the correct script back in English. Thanks for your comment!
@rossmum2 ай бұрын
Not a native speaker so not sure about the actual text, but the accent stuck out a lot. Reminds me of a friend who grew up in the US so while he's a native speaker, his accent is all kinds of messed up 😂
@robingrewal81032 ай бұрын
Great work Also I'm really excited for the major campaign overall the developer's will do at some point in development and what ideas they implement What about you? And what are some things you would like to see if you have any ?
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Hey! Yeah I agree, I'm really looking forward to a proper campaign as well. The current campaign really is more like a "Shuffle" button for missions rather than a storyline based campaign. I'd say the number one thing I'm looking forward too is multiplayer, just like everybody else I guess. But besides that, I'd really like to see other areas and eras of conflict at some point, like the Gulf War for example. Or perhaps even Vietnam. I'm also very excited about the introduction of infantry in GHPC. Currently it is impossible to do properly simulated battles because armor hardly ever operates without infantry support. The final thing I'd love to see is more intelligent AI. AI that respond to sounds and send out forces to actively intercept recon targets. This would make any mission just so much more dynamic and replay-able as the AI could respond differently every time!
@robingrewal81032 ай бұрын
@@akkapamagaming spacking of A.I recently the GHPC dev team did a interview with some of the armored brigade 2 developer's For some background armored brigade Is a real time tactical war game focused on mechanized warfare. The amount of units you control can be up to multiple companies and the maps are eather randomly generated or based off real locations using satellite images and can variy in size from 2 kilometers to 15 kilometers And the sequel will bring many improvements and be 3D rather than 2D top down One of armored brigades best fractures is the A.I wacth can make full tactical battle plans and react to changes in the battlefield by its salf. Meaning it does not need things like way piont and makes every battle different and unique And during the interview josh said that they want to take the A.I more in what direction when they expand apon it. I very happy to hear that and it would add a whole new layer to the game in trams of reliably and gameplay wise What do you think ? Also if you go to harry's art station page you can see some Soviet and east German infantry models as well as ones for small arms
@largezo75672 ай бұрын
I don't want to sound disrespectful, but was the intro supposed to be in Russian?
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Russian AI voice, yes. I reverse translated the audio and it got translated correctly so I assumed it was close enough.
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Also, not disrespectful at all. I always appreciate input and corrections from others. The problem is that I don't speak Russian and I know nobody who does. I'm not surprised if it isn't correct 😅
@samargrewal9292 ай бұрын
nice work :)
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Thanks Samar!
@Bismarck97712 ай бұрын
Awesome video
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Thanks Bismarck!
@danelassiter68382 ай бұрын
Making fire with that ice intro Akkap 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@tr44802 ай бұрын
09:36 It was at this point the commander decided to call his tank "Two For One"
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
Oh man, now I totally need a livery for my in-game M1IP that has "Two For One" written on the gun...
@UeberLandUndMeere2 ай бұрын
You are currently my favourite one in youtube
@akkapamagaming2 ай бұрын
I feel honored, thank you!
@TheGrechuxD3 ай бұрын
hello, do you know anything about terminal ballistics such as bullet weight or shell range, wind, color tracers, they are all red, ricochet? Will anything change...? this is an important thing 🙂🙃😉
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
Hi there! I know the basics but nothing too special. Now, I'm not a game dev, I do not work for Radian Simulations or for GHPC so I'm not sure. But I doubt they will change anything about the current physics, which do seem to be mostly correct and accurate as far as I can tell. I do hope they'll change the tracers though because they are a bit over the top. Don't get me wrong, they are realistic enough during 1x speed. But once you go into slow motion, they look rather terrible.
@danelassiter68383 ай бұрын
Calling the intro a masterpiece would be an understatement, there is just something about it that ticks a form of storytelling that i enjoy.
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
What an amazing compliment to hear! Thank you so much!
@dejanzebic96383 ай бұрын
Not a single viechle shoot back even the opportuniti is there.
@Karagianis3 ай бұрын
TBH the T-80 hasn't really been an impressive tank since the early 1990s. It's a a borderline outdated tank these days, and Russian maintenance being what it is, they have not aged well.
@LelouchVi27413 ай бұрын
When the hell are the Leopard and chieftain getting added?! Also french AMX
@robingrewal81032 ай бұрын
The west Germans are arriving later down the line so we will see leopards No French or British tanks at the current moment since the game is set in fulda gap during 1985 However in the future we very much could see them example in a north German plane expansion pack or a Iran-Iraq war setting as Iran did use quite a few of them
@LelouchVi27412 ай бұрын
@@robingrewal8103 Great news👌
@lukasweiss44623 ай бұрын
AFAIK, the Syrian Army never operated the T-80. Their most numerous tank pre-war was the T-72 together with 62 and 55. Russians delivered T-90A starting in 2015 but no 80s. The 80 did see some combat in Yemen though
@sunnycat693 ай бұрын
This game would be so much fun if you could have a full co-op.Crew, I sadly refunded it.Single player is just not for me
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
I mean, the devs will add multiplayer in the future. It's on the roadmap. So why not buy it anyway? You'll help fund the devs AND the game will probably become more expensive once it's out of early access with multiplayer functionality. Use singleplayer in the meantime to master the game and the vehicles so you can own the battlefield once MP comes out! At least, that's my mindset with it all :)
@razorcola98333 ай бұрын
M774 ?
@michaelwilliams95743 ай бұрын
use the 7.62m M240 on trucks and troops. .5oCal on BRDM and light armor.
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
No .50 cal available on the M1 in GHPC unfortunately. But yes, you can use the 7.62mm on the trucks :)
@subjectc75053 ай бұрын
The T-90 and 80 are my favorite Soviet/Russian tanks. I don't know if it's true, but in the Russo-Ukraine war. Tankers said they preferred the 80 over the 90. and the newer T-80 is the first Russian tank they fixed the reverse speed on i think.
@robingrewal81033 ай бұрын
The T-90M still has the non existent reverse gear of the T72
@40.trananhvu673 ай бұрын
10:14 That was in fact the automatic lead system for T80B (the do have it irl so did the T64B) and because u seem to lased an swing the barrel to the right at the same time, the auto lead system will therefore adjust the gun offset to the right to make up for the movement of the vehicle (just like in the M60TTS and M1s)
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
Yeah I figured. I was so used to only have that functionality in NATO tanks that it took me a bit to figure out lol. I actually find the targeting computing in the T-80B to be much better and more accurate than that of the NATO tanks. Especially while driving.
@40.trananhvu673 ай бұрын
Wait, they r really better than NATO ones, I did not expect that :))))
@alikaraahmet50503 ай бұрын
T-80B did not participate in Afghanistan war, Soviet 40th army didn't have T-80B or even T-72 tank. Neither Syria have T-80 tanks, only Yemen have as an Arab county
@user-bl7xm8yq7s3 ай бұрын
The Syrian Army doesn't have any T-80s
@m_zbrv39673 ай бұрын
Hopefully later they add ERA armour
@JRBKanal3 ай бұрын
I did the video before you and I have less views. As a result I disliked your video.
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
Git gud
@JRBKanal3 ай бұрын
@@akkapamagaming KZbin algorithm is completely unfair, it favours people who put HD videos and has money to buy a good microphone. I'm not a hater, it just has a bitter taste for me
@akkapamagaming3 ай бұрын
@@JRBKanal Well, I suppose long story short, KZbin prefers those who put effort in, not only their video content, but everything around it too. Every little detail in KZbin matters. You can have the most amazing video in the whole wide world, but if you don't put a custom thumbnail on your video, select the wrong tags, have a boring title or whatever, nobody will see the video. And also, I don't have expensive hardware, aside from the PC (which is only expensive because I do professional 4K editing on it). I suppose the mic can be on the pricy side, which is a Røde NT-USB, but I bought mine second hand. You really don't need to spend a lot of money on hardware for KZbin. Most mics will do, as long as you set them up correctly. What matters most of ALL is how you set your video up. Thumbail, title, tags, etc. These are the things that help the algorythm guide people to your videos. I recommend looking up guide videos on the KZbin algorythm. There's plenty of people out there that do a much better job at explaining it all than me. Good luck :)
@JRBKanal3 ай бұрын
@@akkapamagaming Yeah you are probably right. Thanks for the advice and sorry for my childish reaction, I was just on my nerves because I was so excited to do the video first... But when looking at my video again, it's true that the bad microphone makes my speech not only unpleasant but also almost ununderstandable. Good luck too. And I left a like after all.
@111222333daniel3 ай бұрын
So now there is a serious opponent to the M1IP to fight same level? Or is T80B even superior?
@Mil_Sim_Matty3 ай бұрын
Great video man! New sub here! I really love your editing work, too 🤞 GHPC! Has very quickly become my favourite game to play/follow progress on. I picked it up in February 2023, and it has come so far, even since then. The Soviets have to be my favourite, and the quality and power of the T-62, T-64A and T-80B is on another level - definitely gives you the sense of power they would have had in the Fulda area in 1985! Keep up the good work dude, and I'm looking forward to Pushing Tin Part 2 🤟 (Not even had chance to get on my PC yet this week and try it for myself and see how the T-80 stacks up!)
@powg34763 ай бұрын
The red light indicates the TC's override is active. I don't think it makes a difference to whether you can fire or not.