This is a fantastic Script. Thank you for your hard work for the Community.

That is an awesome image Adam, such beauty in the chaos! Cheers Simon

I'm new to pixinsight and also narrow band imaging. Spent the last couple of days working on some different color scripts. I like this one. Seems to work well. Straight foreword.

A fabulous image and equally fabulous story behind it. Thank you, Adam.

This is awesome. Thanks for sharing! Where by chance did you get the H-alpha data?

Only a third of the way through and I paused to set our remote 81 mm telescope to record as much Ha and a little bit of lum for about 6 hours tonight. Wooo! :)

Astonishing.

Awesome Adam great image and nice to listen to some history and other images about it 👍

Great video, it just amazes me what’s out there, very cool doing something different, cheers for that. Dave

Hi Adam - Wonderful video as always. Curious about the scopes used - is the widefield one using your Tak epsilon 180? And what did you use to acquire the close up?

Amazing Adam, in your paid videos do you go into any explanation on how to correct for that gradient. I have had that in many of my images and in most cases just throw out the data. I have always thought it was due to light pollution.

Gorgeous, Adam!

David Attenborough could not tell it better then you Adam...greetings.

Thanks Adam, very cool!

My jaw just hit the floor. Amazing!!!

Had to run to the framing and mosaic tool to check. This beautiful object, alas, is too small to image with my 14.5 inch.

Whoaaaaa I’ve never came across this galaxy!! The structure is Amazing. Inspiring image as usual Adam!! This will for sure be my first light with my cdk14

Fascinating! The background music is perfect! 👍

Saw your image on AB just a few minutes ago and then this popped up in my YT feed. When you show the H-alpha data at 6:15, my first thought was, "wow, that looks like a scorpion!" By the way, what did you mean by "your flat light source wasn't aligned with your scope"? Even better question, "what application of gradient correction tools did you use to fix that mess?" Asking for a friend, I swear :D

Do you have any tutorials covering subpar data? I can't get past the 3rd step because I have horrible background gradient from light pollution and moon. All the tutorials I see are working with nearly flawless data in comparison to me so its very difficult to follow.

As always, I learn plenty from your videos. I like that your techniques are well explained and allow the user to 'customize' their process once they understand the workflow you're teaching. Thank you and Clear Skies!

Thanks for the entire series Adam.. most helpful. I've recently managed to get data from 3 nights on NGC6974, and my question relates to the impact of the "quality" of each night's data. e.g. night 1 was good seeing, nights 2 & 3 were both excellent seeing. In your experience, is it better to simply let WBPP do it's thing and stack them all together despite this "known" quality disparity, or would it be better to simply cull the "good" seeing data and run with the "excellent" instead? I guess a simpler way to say it is - will the "good" bring down the overall result, compared to only processing the "excellent" ?

Thank you , posted the information for Shasta county to check our votes and your video shared. Thank you.

Is this a composite image. The foreground mountains should be blurred because of the long exposure and the rotation of the sky relative to the static foreground.

According to ChatGPT the maximum path/filename length in macOS is 1024 bytes.

Absolutely fascinated. Thank you Adam for sharing so much knowledge. I hope that in the not too distant future they create recognition for astrophotography, you undoubtedly deserve the highest distinction.

KZbinrs are just now catching up to the information I told you about six months ago. The Event Horizon data and their teams interpretation. Adam, if you have sufficient space to download the EHT data set, I'd love to see how your interpretation might look, or if you agree with the Japanese team in that the interpretation might be wrong. I would love to hear your thoughts on this subject and I'm pretty sure the data set is available to the public.

why not use Large Scale pixel rejection in the image integration menu?

mega :)

Hey Sir. Thanks for this video. Can we use this to solve chromatic abberation in achromats ?

Dang it. I had dithered my data. 😢 I hope I will be able to make a good image.

Wow!

Thanks. I have never tried separating stars before DBE and then adding them back for SPCC later.

Nice work 🙌 you were lucky to get 7 nights imaging

wow! ♥

beautiful 👏🏻

Very nice. You got 7 nights in a row clear skies?

really cool I'm going to try to get it with my scope tomorrow night, we've had clouds for over a week.

Very cool! I captured the same event in a time lapse.

Absolutely incredible

I need to review your comet processing technique again. I have some good data but so far I can’t seem to do it justice.

Fantastic!!!!!!

Amazing work, as always. What focal length was used to capture this?

Very cool! Thanks for sharing.

Crazy! I love it.

Fantastic!

Awesome so much detail

That. Was. Awesome (O_O)

Spectacular! 👍

I'm using a OSC and when I load my images and open my first light it is in grey scale. Why is that? Thanks