Italian Mapper 2

Пікірлер

@Iter_fire_guy 30 минут бұрын

lor

@gentreshtani826 3 күн бұрын

If there was no Yugoslavia, Kosova would've become independent and joined Albania back in the 40's. Albanian partisans were foolish enough to believe politics, they died in faraway battles in Serbia, Croatia and even Slovenia. Anyhow, peace and liberty to all. F* war!

@Пеђа-ж3ф 4 күн бұрын

In addition to these borders that you mentioned from 1921, the Kingdom of Serbia, as a victorious power, would also receive Krajina, all of Bosnia, and would share the Adriatic with Italy. Croatia would remain within the borders around Zagreb, which are its natural borders. How lucky we are to have done that.

@TheMacedonianMappers 5 күн бұрын

I love the part where Macedonia was there 😐

@goranbakic2938 6 күн бұрын

beware of nsa pedos remote neural monitoring and organized gangstalking !!!

@ILikeHistory1444 7 күн бұрын

Qhat would nake slovenian psrtisans able to reach trieste

@makhadensen_67 8 күн бұрын

2023 and 2024 left the chat

@vickvickson4273 10 күн бұрын

You who made this totally unnecessary and wrong science fiction, should have educated yourself. First of all and most important - about Treaty of London (from 1915). According to it, the territorial promises to Serbia and Italy at the expense of Austria Hungary were big and very clear.

@Brittle475 12 күн бұрын

This is Basically a slightly different TNO

@SlavisaGlavendekic 15 күн бұрын

Bullshit

@jankramar6727 16 күн бұрын

why is Međimurje slovenian 4:16

@tarikmehmedika2754 16 күн бұрын

Gorss

@janpetrucci9106 16 күн бұрын

What game is that?

@ivanpralija9004 18 күн бұрын

We would then been demokracy for 80years , more.advanced 2x then now and it would be small but great state.now we are doing good but history for was tough for us Croats😁

@Shotgunner01 18 күн бұрын

If Yugoslavia wasn't created in 1918 there are several possible scenarios. 1. If we presume that Serbia and Montenegro continued to exist as separate states, and if both Serbia and Montenegro were awarded per London treaty, then Montenegro would gain Dubrovnik and parts of Herzegovina, perhaps Skadar (that's a big if) while Serbia would get the rest of Herzegovina, Bosnia, part of Dalmatia and Slavonia. Macedonia, Kosovo and Vojvodina would be recognized as territories of Serbia as well. 2. If Serbia and Montenegro decided to unite into single Serbian state and if we presume that Allies would allow to incorporate Montenegrin post war territorial rights then we have different picture. In that case Serbia would gain large part of Dalmatia, entire Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slavonia, Macedonia, Kosovo, Montenegro and Vojvodina would be considered Serbian territories. Now the big question is what would happen to Slovenes and Croats? Would they form separate states or some sort of united states between them? Would Slovenia and Croatia even exist or would their territories be incorporated into Austria and Hungary? Would Slovenia go to Austria (for historic reason) and Croatia to Hungary (for historic reason). What about other nationalities? Would there be a thing called Bosnian, Macedonian or Montenegrin or would they all be Serbs of three faiths - Orthodox, Catholics and Muslims - and all based on Shtokavian language which is basically Serbian. Those are all speculations and what if's. On my personal opinion I think Yugoslavia was the biggest mistake for Serbs after WW1 because that state didn't survive. It doesn't exist anymore therefore all the sacrifice of our ancestors is for nothing. Even Serbia without any gains is better than Yugoslavia.

@Skye_thegolden 16 күн бұрын

Bro no one cares, I ain’t reading that. Ur wasting time by typing that.

@Shotgunner01 16 күн бұрын

@@Skye_thegolden Ahahaha, you just wasted your time by replying. I don’t give a damn if you care or not.

@Skye_thegolden 16 күн бұрын

@@Shotgunner01 wasted* oh iwasted by time again

@AleksandarJovanovic-on6cj 18 күн бұрын

They killed the best country in Europe😡

@DamirB-jo1pz 5 күн бұрын

Why are making a video,how do you want it to be,are you miserable.Who will make your dreams come true Stevice?

@CanadianMapper4 22 күн бұрын

Nah, even Switzerland joined

@ИлијаЈовановић-з7ъ 22 күн бұрын

Croatia is not exist in this time dude.

@jonomobono3223 17 күн бұрын

Croatia is much older then serbia

@ИлијаЈовановић-з7ъ 16 күн бұрын

@@jonomobono3223 But not exist in this time whatever.

@jordandino417 23 күн бұрын

Nepal being spherical instead of being a rawr is very unsettling…

@historybalkans-dq5ig 24 күн бұрын

Bla bla bla. Srijem je 1922 bio HRVATSKI

@OropherIsilra 24 күн бұрын

Fak yugoslavia. Finaly Serbia without all those who would not have states without Serbia.

@LukkiSkywalker 24 күн бұрын

Strong spaghetti influence on worlds history😂😂😂

@赤青白 25 күн бұрын

It is impossible to accurately predict what kind of borders Serbia would've had today had Yugoslavia never happened. The country was promised great expansion to the west (Bosnia), already had Macedonia and recently annexed Montenegro. I don't think those borders would've held to this day. People think if Yugoslavia hadn't formed, there wouldn't be a civil war, but I don't think so. A Greater Serbia would still have to deal with revolt, mostly from Muslim minorities in Kosovo, Bosnia and western Macedonia. No one can say how the borders would be changed from that.

@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh 21 күн бұрын

It's easy to predict what territory of the Great Serbia were, if You-go- to Savia never existed. The borders would be like Šešelj and Milošević wanted, on the beginning of the 1990s. Thanks God, that was never happen and the State of SHS, the Kingdom of SHS, the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and the NDH were created, in our timeline. If that would never be, than the borders like today will never existed. And, do not forget, that states were made by big powers who wanted to control the South Slavs. Like the Great Britain, France, Russia, the USSR, later USA, Israel, Germany and Italy. Be saluted and think! If that scenario was approved by big 4, after WW1, that borders would exist in our timeline. But, that was not approved. ✍

@attilatasciko4817 25 күн бұрын

FAKE ! WHERE IS THE " YUGOSLAV WAR " MID 90'S ‽

@attilatasciko4817 25 күн бұрын

SHOULD SHOW THE ENTIRE HUNGARIES TERRITORY AS STARTED IN 1000 AC . Etc...

@Onaj_Posranac 26 күн бұрын

Wrong, after the break up if austria-hungary, in the south slavic lands was the Country of Slovenes Croats and Serbs(preaty much greater croatia)

@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh 21 күн бұрын

Da li znaš koja je bila najveća slavenska država, ovih prostora, prije Jugoslavije? Austro-Ugarska! Imala je 51 milijun stanovnika ( 1910. ), 60 % su bili Slaveni ( ne svi nužno Južni ) i imala je površinu, od čak 676 615 kvadratnih kilometara. To je bila zemlja veća i od današnje Ukrajine, Francuske, a kamo li od male i posrane Jugoslavije. Bila je tada šesta industrijska sila svijeta, te peta vojna u Europi i svijetu. Ma kakve Jugoslavije, Kraljevine Hrvata ili Dušanovo Carstvo. Čak niti Bugarsko Carstvo nije nikada naraslo do te veličine. Samo je Rusko Carstvo bilo veće, a i ono nije nikada bilo ni do koljena našoj Monarhiji, čijeg su Prijestolonasljednika ubili Srbi i Rusi, u Sarajevu, 28. Lipnja, 1914. I, izazvali 1. Svjetski rat i svoju vlastitu nesreću. Počivaj u miru, naš ljubljeni Frane Ferdinandu Habsburg - Lotringenu. Bio bi dobar Car da ga banda nije umorila, te nesretne 1914. godine. Sramite se sluge ruskog pan-slavizma i tuđih čizama, koje ste služili, od pada Galipolja i Carigrada pod Turke, pa sve do današnjih dana, onih sila koje žele zagospodariti nad Europom i na Balkanu. Pozdrav!

@CigkofteXD 26 күн бұрын

I finally found the sound they useon those mapping videos lol (00:48)

@МилошВекић 26 күн бұрын

😂 лупост невиђена😂

@RonaldGrant-l7n 28 күн бұрын

Next do what if Weimar Republic survived

@RonaldGrant-l7n 28 күн бұрын

I’m so glad the vid is back!

@ZorobelusRex 28 күн бұрын

Bla bla bla 😂😂😂

@grandma77. 29 күн бұрын

Slovenia wouldnt give Istria to Croatia

@929W Ай бұрын

Međimurje has no Slovenians it would end up in Croatia

@Simonadas04 Ай бұрын

What ww2 should have been like...

@jZi5523 Ай бұрын

Totally unrealistic interpretation of key historical events: 1. Check the situation at the end of World War I (the territories controlled by the Serbian army and the demographic picture of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia at that time - the king was an idiot for accepting Yugoslavia, and they deserved the way their reign ended). 2. Bosnia didn't exist and certainly wouldn't have received any form of self-government, let alone a state at that time. 3. If it weren't for the communists, Serbia wouldn't have received autonomous provinces, there wouldn't have been forced migrations or confiscation of property in Kosovo, nor the prevention of the return of displaced persons (thus, secession and separation would never have happened). Watch the Czech documentary film that has beautifully documented all the evidence on this topic - " Uloupené Kosovo" by director Václav Dvořák and producer Aleš Bednář

@drazenborsi4283 Ай бұрын

Union between Croatia and Bosnia is more realistic, while Serbia gets partitioned between Hungary and Bulgaria leaving Serbia in borders before 1st bslkan war.

@nenadkrstic6087 Ай бұрын

The whole premise is wrong, the map implies that somehow Slovenia, Bosnia and Croatia had defined borders prior to 1918, and that they joined Serbia and Montenegro who were in fact independent countries at the time. Loss of world war one led to break up off Austria Hungary, and Serbia got to create Kingdom of Serbs Croats as Slovenes as a reward for being one of the winning sides. The kingdom was later renamed to Kingdom of Yugoslavia again with Serbian monarchy at the helm.

@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh 21 күн бұрын

That is all correct, Nenad Krstić. Somebody don't know history of Yugoslavia and the Slavic nations, during last more than 200 years. Be saluted! 👌👍🤝✍

@KardioIzletmetovic Ай бұрын

Bosnia didn't exist in 1918, it was a part of the state of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs just like Slovenia and Croatia

@dzeno2688 24 күн бұрын

Existed before it

@KardioIzletmetovic 23 күн бұрын

@@dzeno2688 until the Ottomans maybe, but even that was shortlived since Croatia ruled over Bosnia until the ottomans arrived

@Vdst5244 21 күн бұрын

Bosnia and Herz. was part of AustroHungary until 1918. Croatia didn' ruled with Bosnia before Ottomans. Croatia didn't existed since 1097. Croatia was part of Kingdom Hungary with hungarian kings rule

@medmiks6895 17 күн бұрын

Jašta, a u 14 stoljeću. Za vrijeme kralja tvrtka pola dalmacije pod bosnom

@anasanja1214 13 күн бұрын

@@Vdst5244 Bro wth Nah Kingdoms of Croat Slavonia and Dalmatia were created in 857 and also one of most popular Crpatian kings ruled ower Croatia in that time also Bosnia and Serbia were created later

@ivankaraula222 Ай бұрын

Jesus is only way to Heaven❤✝️🙂

@Tinola1212 Ай бұрын

What if Mussolini didint get elected What if Soviet union wasn't approved to join allies

@UkiticaEdit Ай бұрын

Name app???

Ай бұрын

What a load of bullshit...

@comrademayohasacheeseaddiction Ай бұрын

What is the map that you use and how can I use it?

@Vojkan796 Ай бұрын

What an irony of fate... then our ancestors fought with their lives not to be part of "Europe"... and now they rush like geese in the fog to be part of "Europe".😢😢😢

@ФилипСимић Ай бұрын

нека иду само ће најбољи да остану ми ћемо ко преци у планине да бежимо као велики Скендербег што је чинио

@Vojkan796 Ай бұрын

@@ФилипСимић izgleda da će tako i biti... opet u chetovanjè.

@Grywko Ай бұрын

Gut gut gut

@ACanadianGoosee Ай бұрын

USSR and Germany switched places in this timeline

@RicoBanani Ай бұрын

Bosnia turning fascist is highly unlikely

@chemcheps Ай бұрын

some fact: Ante Pavelic, the leader of NDH and Ustasa was born in Bosnia. :)

@dole7959 Ай бұрын

@@chemchepsby chance, his parents came to live there to work from a village called Krivi put near Senj, Croatia

@DaliborPerkovic-sw8mh 21 күн бұрын

Bosnia is real Croatian land. Not Serbian! Name come from river Bosnia and that land was before the Ottoman invasion, in 1463, a Catholic part of Europa. Not Orthodox one! And, there were lived Croats before the Turks. The Bosniac ethnicity not exist. It's never been real! That is a bullshit! Bosnia was founded from migrated Croats to Bosnian hills and mountains, in 12th century, after Croatian defeat of Hungarians on Petrova gora, in 1097. They made Bosnian Kingdom, because they doesn't wanted the Union with Hungary, in 1102. Technically, that was the newest Croatian Kingdom, after the fall of the Kingdom of Croats, under the Hungarian Dynasty Arpadović. All other history of Bosnia today is false or just a bullshit. Today Bosnian Muslims are really converted Croats to Islam, in 15th and 16th century. And, Bosnian Serbs are just Croats who lost own identity, after they converted on Orthodox Christianity, under the Turks, in 16th and 17th century. With help of corrupt Serbian Orthodox Church and the Turks! Simple as that! Be saluted and people, you doesn't believe in some huge bullshits, and lies. It is all obvious there. If people, one day, take that, than it would be no wars between Croats and Serbs in Bosnia. Nevermore!

@pedro_tenshihan1 Ай бұрын

might add "unrealistic" alternate world wars on the title aswell

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер