I paused at 2:16 because the rule is written oddly. It basically says a disconcerting act is when someone does a disconcerting act. That’s like saying the definition of a cat is an animal that looks like a cat.

It’s hard to give that to the offense knowing they have the snap count now if the defense was to audibly distract the offense it seems more of a factor

If the defensive line did this on every snap for shift movements, I would allow it. If this was only done once per game during a money down then I would flag the defense. Context matter in this case

If you thought the ball was beyond LOS it sure looks like KCI on kicking team.

R holding and PF K for the shove of the R player on the ground. Same outcome as no foul, right? But it sends a message to play aggressive UT cleanly.?

As an official I find the more you can show presence and just quick chit chat with the kids and show respect they play with respect (moat of the time haha)

Only thing i would add is once you throw the flag turn and continue with the play.

In my personal opinion how i look at this as an Umpire I look to see if the engagement was initial and consistent and small(yards). With that, i usually talk to the lineman briefly when we have a moment and let them know "Hey, I like the blocks you have but on pass plays dont drive them too far because i could've called you downfield on that one". Typically with that simple talk i have no issues" and they love the heads up and makes for better play for our game and future games with other officals. You throw a flag everyones emotion gets heightened and those eggressive blocks can turn spicy quick. If the lineman is just downfield just to be down field i throw it.

MIBT, I have two videos that I can't find much on. 1) Umpire ball placement between hashes and when a ball and shouldn't be replaced. Most of the time it's easy but for new officials it would be nice to have a condensed version of this. On PAT, Field Goal, Kick-off, can you move after O/D of Timeouts, Punts, Safety Punt, Fair-Catch, incomplete passes, after each quarter (switching sides). 2) Can you talk about odd formations and how you want the crew to talk when this comes up. As a newer official in the Umpire position I find it challenging at times to quickly identify that the TE is covered up at my angle if a WR is on the line or not especially in SC headsets aren't used in most games.

100% i think it was interception. Joint possession does go to the offe se but that second or two after hitting the ground to complete the processes of a catch i believe it shifted from joint to defense completed the pass and WR removing his control. As a Umpire and especially when I'm a Back Judge nothing grinds my gears more than when line officials try to put be a 1 man show on TDs. There's absolutely no way from his angle, he even sees the ball and control as they're turned away from him. At times crews look sloppy taking too long but theres also times sloppiness can be based when rushing. This is a prime example of when working fast makes you look very sloppy!

What about initial contact with the snapper?

Question on this: These players ran down the field together and touching each other nearly the whole time. Does that also constitute as not being blind to it?

Block in the back 100%

100%

As an official, my personal opinion is that the player with the ball was attempting to breakout of the initial tackle and the defensive player came in to make a play quickly to make sure he couldn't get out. I'll keep the flag in my pocket and as an Umpire or Back Judge take 10 seconds and talk with the kid saying "thanks for not going helmet to helmet and next time lead with arms because it was a close call on UNR on a defensless reciever. 9/10 times the kid respects the crew so much more in situations like this. If you have played football, especially on both sides, you understand a lot more of the judgment and rationality in these high-pressure situations. Another thing a lot of videos miss, which I believe is a HUGE thing is timing of the whistle. Of course if whistle blown penalty, if not all officials are deeming it alstill as live and player is active in attempting to breaking out.

In my opinion the open or closed hand does not matter in terms of fighting. If you believe it's a combative action with a hand then it's a DQ. Both should be gone even though I would talk with the kid in the white saying I understand your frustration and your reaction but you cannot fight swing what so ever. Then I would go to 44 on white and let him know that I appreciate you for taking action and getting your player away. Huge respect with that action. I agree that urgency is necessary. As an official you need to get close and try to settle it down

Even if you thought it was a muff beyond the LOS, wouldn’t it be first touching by K? Looks like K touches it then R touches it.

I had this happen in a 10U Pop Warner game today. Punt was blocked behind the LOS and was muffed by R behind the LOS. K recovered the ball after the muff. My HL had stayed on the LOS and said the muff occurred behind the LOS. I announced that the ball had muffed by R behind the LOS and that that touching is ignored. It was recovered by K but they did not make the line to gain, it was R ball at the spot of recovery. I will just say that K coach did not react well to the ruling resulting in a UNC.

1000000%

Sir! This was a big game played on 9.13.2024. I’m doing a recap video on it. I don’t want to get into this portion of it. But there were a lot of calls that a lot of fans are upset about. I imagine your video would be very helpful. I am Box County. kzbin.infoCNmPXWnwMuc?si=AnkLR9X5aYNExweu

With all the action in the sideline, the wing official is slow to get over and be a presence to potentially stop this before it starts

Notice the rule states “to strike in a combative manner “. Not a fist vs open hand. To me both are DQ’d for fighting. They each struck their opponent in a combative manner

I contend that if this ball is live....it shouldn't be live any more. Forward progress is stopped. I think we would support a flagrant and a possible ejection.

Here's a question that perhaps you can help answer...this past Fri, a player(rb) had removed his helmet after a play, and said it was due to a player on the defense pushing it up during the play, therefore the rb was removing it in order to put the helmet back on properly. I personally have experienced this problem with the Schutt F7 helmets, in that it doesn't seem to fit right if it comes halfway up and you just push it back down, part of the padding in the back of the helmet seems to bunch up unless you remove it and put it back on. The player was wearing the schutt f7 helmet, so it made since to me. But there was a flag thrown on the rb for removing the helmet and the penalty was for unsportsmanlike conduct. Is this the correct way to address this situation?

Definitely flagrant!

Reall...What chart???

What happens to a hs football player that cursed out referee for calling a penalty

28

Mmm, a bunch of things going through my mind watching this... That *&^%$!? logo in the middle of the field might make it a little tougher to judge 10yds if the kid kicks it straight forward. Does the Big Ten allow that sort of interference with the lines on the field because the rules seem to say otherwise. NCAA Rule 1.2.1.f.1 The entirety of all yard lines, goal lines and sidelines must be clearly visible. No portion of any such line may be obscured by decorative markings. Luckily, it didn't matter on this play. After a bit of googling, I stumbled across the box score on the IHSA website archive which answered my other two questions. How did the game end? It remained 31-v-25. How come you are all alone back there? It was only a crew of 5 which was a bit of a shocker. I expected for the top game of the season, they would put out a crew of 7. It was great to see you at our convention in the UK earlier this year, all the best.

I'm of the incomplete pass school. He's bobbling it all over the place before he drops it. Never had possession.

Northern VA is enforcing exactly the same as Illinois ! 👍

That player is not defenseless at the point he took possession and began to advance the ball.

Great job on that play, Tim. Very professional work getting to the spot, killing the clock, finding the ball, and matter-of-factly signaling possession. And good job blocking out the shrill screaming of a high school game in a pressure moment. That's why you're there! -Mark

Good call.

Mechanically, I would be wider if I was the BJ and the LJ should be breaking down field with the snap to get eyes on everything that you described. I think I'd pass on KCI and even though R9 throws a block, the BJ likely didn't see it because of his angle, and it appears as if he is watching the recovery of the ball. If he is wider and the LJ is down field, maybe it gets caught but it is pretty bang bang. Good job killing the play when R recovers. R gives up the right to advance with the fair catch.

By the book. Great job Marc.

Good advice. Sometimes coaches just want to feel heard.

Can you share the chart which you are referring too?

29

Ok, so we have the crew get together, and the KCI flag is waved off - do we then have an IW? Was the whistle blown before R had possession of the kick? If yes, then rekick? If after possession, why?

Ok, so we have the crew get together, and the KCI flag is waved off - do we then have an IW? Was the whistle blown before R had possession of the kick? If yes, then rekick? If after possession, why?

Umpire did a good job here helping everyone out with the right call that only he could see very well. Just seemed like his crewmates werent trusting him a lot.

I agree with the no KCI. I disagree that the returner is blocking after giving a fair catch signal as I have White #13 with the ball before the returner blocks.

Not forceable. If he drives him to the floor yes, but he lets up so ill pass on the flag

There's a thin line between love and hate, likewise with the tackle box boundaries,. Ref isn't quite deep enough to rule on him being out. Once QB recovered muff he was in "get rid of ball mode " Getting out of tacklebox wasn't his major concern. I got him in....IG

Not forcible enough, imo

I'm sorry but I'm adding both. UNR and the UNS for the clap. He shoved after the play enough to put the player in white to the ground, then steps back and claps about his actions...No, that's both fouls

Football ain’t football no more might as well just call it two hand touch or flag football

Defenseless player. Player safety first.

Well I just we just have to disagree. Once the QB gain possession he was in a related run. Once he fumbles it becomes a loose ball and not loose ball play because of the related run. However, because of the new rule enforcement if there was a foul by B and B gain possession (disregard the pervious face mask foul) the end of the run would be the bean bag at spot of the fumble (basic spot). Since the run ended behind the LOS and regardless of where B fouls the PE will be the pervious spot LOS. However, under the old all but one principle the PE would be at the bean bag (basic spot). This is way I was taught and I have enforce this before the change. Anyway great discussions. I am not rule a hawk... just a umpire and referee who wants to keep my crew straight. This discussions keeps me in books. Thanks and good luck this season.