KZbin:ROBERT SEPHER mit "QUEEN OF ISLAM" ELIZABETH2

Correct !!! Wellington did not like to admit it.

Hehe 0:59

😈

His favourite march his forbidden to be played in the Bundeswehr.

@@JunoSweetheart the Badenweiler Marsch is not forbidden in the Bundeswehr!

Would you fly a Typhoon like a Spitfire?

67,661 British soldiers, 48,000 Prussian Soldiers. A German victory? Not really. In fact it was a team effort.

@@Ul.B Yes,,,but what's exactly british army ? Kingdown of GB = 31.000 Soldiers (with King German Legion) Kingdown of NL = 17.000 Soldiers Kingdown of Hannover = 11.000 Soldiers Kingddown of Brunswick = 6000 Soldiers Kingdown of Nassau = 3.000 Soldiers Kingdown of Prussia = 50.000 In fact 118.000 Soldiers (including 87.000 German's soldiers) French army = 72.000 Soldiers

@@christmar67 67,661 British army meaning under British command (Wellington), therefore British army. It is somewhat strange that you forgot about 17,000 Dutch soldiers under Wellington's command. Weren't they important enough, because they didn't fit into your plan?

@@Ul.B In Fact , History is written by the victors

@@christmar67 Again this brown crap that is only spread by far-right people. The opposite is the truth, because the winner has actually no intention in writing history.

these are real, serving soldiers in the army, not robot's, actors or whatever rumor's are about these days.

@@militaryevents107well said!

They look very nice it’s just....errrr....how do I put this?? They’ll never beat the umm....’other’ uniforms LMAO. I mean they were so damn HOT in those. Never mind me i think it’s just the hormones.

@@mamavswild just a side note: Deutsche Marine and Luftwaffe still use the exact same uniform used by Kriegsmarine and Luftwaffe back in WWII

@@Kalashnikov413 that's why they look so good.

Wish the WW1 uniforms would come back for marches tho, those were nice

Chilean still preserves a good part of Prussian traditions including uniforms. It would be even better if they marched in traditional Prussian uniforms.

yeah huge bearskin hats aren't weird

Ich finde die britischen Uniformen auch viel cooler als unsere muss ich gestehen 😄 egal was viele zb über die Bärenfellhüte sagen

That is because he was not technically part of the parade or possession and his job was to oversee and direct a whole number of things around the parade. Do you expect a theatre company's floor manager to behave all actor like the night it has a performance?

He's probably forgotten more about being a soldier than you'll ever know. But I'm sure your a dab hand at COD.

Feldzeichen ist der Schellenbaum. Musikkorps haben keine Truppenfahnen.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/mmiWZpKsipl3oZY&ab_channel=SchmidtLondon. Here you go :)

*Königskrätzer march*

Yup, thanks to the holy clean always nice allies. Which definently never destroyed our culture or something.

wtf this is not true don't you know Prussia and all that? The music they're playing, the "Schellenbaum", the thing what that guy carries who walks ahead and the moves are from the 19th century and older.

Side note: The current german armed forces, the Bundeswehr was founded in 1955. 1000 years before, in 955 there was the first campaign in which levies from all german tribes formed an ,german' army.

@@brittakriep2938 You talking about the Varusschlacht? That was hardly all german tribes.

@@huntingrunner : Attention! When we germans speak about ourselves, we call ourselves , deutsch' or ,die Deutschen'. When we speak of ,Germanen' we mean either our ancestors in tribal age, or the members of all germanic nations. So the troops in 955 campaign, when german king ( from 962 onwards Emperor ) Otto l fought Hungarian troops, invading Germany for plundering and robbery on Lechfeld near Augsburg, came from those tribes , which formed the GERMAN nations at this day. This means: In marching order the Avantgarde had been Bavarian troops, then Otto l came with his Saxons, next the frankish ( franconian?) troops, then the Swabians, then the baggage train, and as Arrieregarde the Bohemians/ Czech. A bit unclear is for me, why no Thuringians. That no Frisians had been envolved, has its reason of no frisian nobility, only a lot of chiefs. That no Brandenburger, Pommern or Schlesier/Silesians had been envolved: This regions had been in 10th century not conqueted / settled by germans, but by ununited slavic tribes. So, you know about ,Battle of Teutoburg Forrest', which was in 9 after Jesus Christ, in this case germanic/ germanisch , but not german / deutsch is true. In Teutoburg days, nobody expected this, what later became German Nation/ Deutsches Volk. I hope, this helps you.