9 ай бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@lexheath8276 Күн бұрын
Uh guys, its real name is 7,65 Browning.
@markbroad119 6 күн бұрын
Nice. How about 7mm-08 vs 308 ? I just found your channel and really like it
@713Tavernilla 7 күн бұрын
Cool video !
@meanstreak1170 9 күн бұрын
Boy, that .556 does not like orange stickers.
@cpreit8862 9 күн бұрын
The 6.5 prc blows the needs more out of the water, no comparison
@stanlee399 13 күн бұрын
Laser beams. 💥
@user-yu1zp2vu9x 14 күн бұрын
Good information. Thanks
@garyferrer2032 15 күн бұрын
Well that 22lr was better than the 32 for sure
@Manbunmen65 15 күн бұрын
You have to chronograph your rifle it's the only way to know the true velocities. For example...My Bergara premier approach 24 inch 6.5 PRC shoots Federal 130 TA at an average of 3150 and the box is 3000. But my Browning Hells Canyon longe range Mcmillian 6.5 PRC 26 inch shoots the same factory loads at just box velocities. The Browning is slower with all factory loads I have shot it with with 2 inches more barrel.
@PilotMcbride 15 күн бұрын
Welcome back!!! Missed your info sessions. Hope everything is ok. Thanks for another great vid. Edit: I'm more than happy with my Charlie Mike. Personally, I'm not convinced the added expense moving to a PRC is worth it.
@outdooradventures1696 12 күн бұрын
Thank you Mr. Mcbride. Good to hear from you again. Am working on a few more projects. Will look forward to your info on those as well...
@glashoppah 16 күн бұрын
You should get with The Slow Mo Guys. This sort of thing is right up their alley. Get those bullets entering those jugs at super high speed in very high clarity.
@ThorrRA3793 16 күн бұрын
That would have been spleen shot at 300 yards 100% fatal.
@poorfatman5317 16 күн бұрын
I know you said it should have been placed at 140 I still don't understand why one sixty five
@outdooradventures1696 16 күн бұрын
I said that it "could have" been set at 140 and that would have made for an accurate comparison so long as I was not unlucky enough to shoot a "hot" round at the moment of truth (which would have caused the 147 grain to arrive with a bit too much speed.) I wanted to take that risk out of the equation. Also, I wanted to leave a little room for some upside surprise in performance in case anyone were to purchase a 6.5 prc based on this performance. Hope that clears things up. :)
@lrac7751 16 күн бұрын
125-130 grain bullets seem to be the sweet spot for my creed, so far, everything has dropped in its tracks
@outdooradventures1696 16 күн бұрын
Thank you for the good data. Much appreciated... Btw, what distances are you shooting?
@lrac7751 16 күн бұрын
@@outdooradventures1696 I’m in the rain forest in Pacific Northwest, so 150 yards would be a long shot for me, the heavier, tougher bullets tend to zip right through. At that range, I think the creed outperforms the PRC
@Manbunmen65 15 күн бұрын
@@lrac7751Less powerful rounds generally outperform more powerful ones.
@johnkader1176 17 күн бұрын
Do you plan on hunting with any of these match bullets? Decision on 6.5 PRC purchase?
@outdooradventures1696 16 күн бұрын
@Johnkader1176... From what I have seen, the eld match does a great job on game such as deer. Would rather hunt with Berger though.
@outdooradventures1696 16 күн бұрын
@Johnkader1176...In regards to a 6.5 prc upgrade, 3 choices are worth considering....1) get another 6.5 cm with a 26 inch barrel and start shooting the 153.5 Berger, 156 Berger, or 153 Hornady A-tip (and handloading to get better performance without going too much powder obviously.) 2) simply purchase a 6.5 prc for the purpose of running the heavier bullets like, the ones mentioned above along with the 147 eld. 3.) skip the prc and obtain a 6.8 western and run the 165 to 175 grain bullets. Looking forward to your thoughts... Thanks.
@johnvogt5847 17 күн бұрын
Speed kills.
@user-yu1zp2vu9x 18 күн бұрын
I really enjoy this 556 vs 308 comparison. These are my two favorite rounds. It would have been interesting to see the barrel length and twist for my information.
@bobcatforever3485 18 күн бұрын
OA. Good and interesting video. Thanks for all of your work. Great shooting and thanks for sharing. Take care.
@outdooradventures1696 18 күн бұрын
Thank you for your encouraging words. Always good hearing from you. Hope your channel is doing well also...
@bobcatforever3485 18 күн бұрын
@@outdooradventures1696 Thanks. Nothing great going on over here but still having fun shooting and posting a video every now and then. Thanks Again!
@BullseyeBenR 18 күн бұрын
I’ve used that opening on one of my vids too
@IvanDaniel28 22 күн бұрын
it was more like 10 & a 1/3 revolutions.
@johnanon658 22 күн бұрын
Barrel length?
@unmannedgunner6132 25 күн бұрын
Crazy results though. Thank you for the video
@unmannedgunner6132 25 күн бұрын
Surprised you didnt also test 5.56 m855 ball. Feel like that would have been a better match to the m80 ball.
@alanpennick1764 Ай бұрын
I didn't think the 556 would be more devastating at 300 uds than 308
@letsmove1559 Ай бұрын
Good show 223 is not a 556 interesting,would of liked seeing the pieces of frags thanks
@kennethnero8963 Ай бұрын
Exactly as designed, 5.56 kills at 300 yards in devastating fashion, while the 308 and 7.62 are designed for 1,000 yard kills.
@donaldcarlson-dr8tw Ай бұрын
what is it ? ohh hyperstatic shock ouch
@WilliamMeade-ow5dv Ай бұрын
The silver tip of make an awesome deer or antelope load
@tomg6284 Ай бұрын
Age of the plastics makes a difference.
@adamlong54 Ай бұрын
Speed is the killer take a TNT varmint grenade bullet maxed powder load over 4k fps if i remember correctly 32 or 35 grain solid copper bullet
@jamesshaw89 Ай бұрын
Another excellent video, thanks for making and sharing these.
@jamesshaw89 Ай бұрын
That was an excellent demo! thanks for putting this all together and sharing it.
@3029dz Ай бұрын
Manufacturers rate .223 velocity out of a standardized 24" barrel.
@billortloff4215 Ай бұрын
A 5.56 fmj would've been a nice comparison.
@JohnBarrios-x7l Ай бұрын
Good video!!!!! You made leary fun......
@mcnultypride Ай бұрын
I thought 7.62x51 was the same as .308
@justanobserver530 Ай бұрын
Animal flesh is thicker than water. I've seen many videos that "prove " the same thing for 17hmr. Sometime I will do the Paul Harrell meat test and find out the real answers. Just one example, 17hmr will go through a treated 6x6 but the 22wmr will not. Animals are not made of wood but they're not made of water or jello either.
@coachwilson5967 Ай бұрын
.566 is a lot of bang for your buck.
@RobertBrown-vm3ce Ай бұрын
Should try a 53 gr Hornady Vmax @3400 fps in the 5.56.
@MattC-eo6ep Ай бұрын
Nice video - Thanks!
@DanielDAY-w3n Ай бұрын
with everyone's opinion What would be the best Zero for a 5.56 77grn otm 16" Barrel ?
@tonykirby9574 Ай бұрын
Should have compared with 6.5 Creedmoor as 3rd rd..
@Matt-g1u Ай бұрын
556 is not better than 308 lol . 308 just punched right through
@KungFuHonky Ай бұрын
Good comparison using similar barrel lengths. I don't think you can expect the same expansion from live tissue as you'd get from clay, but it does give a good comparative sense of the cartridges effect.
@richardjyoung4093 Ай бұрын
I have a 300 sm that will hit that red circle at 300 yds
@kevinolesik1500 Ай бұрын
those jugs are really tough plastic ...
@GeezerWheels Ай бұрын
Would love to see a comparison to a .308 110 grain or 125 grain hp or soft point. I used to load 125 gr .30 cal to about 3000 to 3100 fps - DEVASTATING! Thanks for a great video!!!
@BryanKrauss-u7y Ай бұрын
What is the most reliable ammo Loretta 30x
@Marcus-rg7bg Ай бұрын
The more i learn about 5.56 the more amazed i am. Such a tiny little thing. Cookin.
@kennypridemore5466 Ай бұрын
Shot placement anywhere in the orange circle is great shooting , and anyone who doesnt think so has never done any long distance shooting .... 😊