1.4 Research Domain Criteria

This video is part of the first section in the edX course from "Brain to Symptom - introduction to neuroscientific psychiatry" by psychiatrist and course director Christoffer Rahm, and Karolina Sörman, Head of unit Continuing Education Center for Psychiatry Research, researcher in clinical neuroscience at Karolinska Institutet and assistant course director.
This video discusses the research framework; Research Domain Criteria, the RDoC-project.
If you liked this video, follow the link to sign up for the full self-paced course on edX www.edx.org/co... for reading material, quizzes and more.
Credits:
Thomas Nixon
the Educational Technologists (Karolinska Institutet)

[@shrawastilavanya7228]

I wish this video gets more views and likes. You both have explained it eloquently in a short span of time. Thank you :)

[@surendergrover3380]

A very nice introduction to Rdoc and helpful slides Thanks it was a great help

[@IanALane]

PhD-training Experimental Psychobiologist, here. I am wondering why the RDOC has not included as a major domain "Personality Processes," such as the five-factor model? There is a "social" and "cognitive" domain, and I see that pieces of "Neuroticism" in the big five are captured by negative and positive valence, to a degree, but the psychometric validity and reliability of something like the five-factor model is far better than most social constructs. Just a curious thing of note, as I watch this otherwise illuminating video. I have great respect for the work these scientists are doing, as my own work closely aligns with this framework.

[@Chysp010-sd7nt]

There is no stigma for a runner who strains a muscle, or a pro athlete who has to rehydrate more than the average person. It sounds like RDoC will help bring neurologically pathological conditions out of the moral, bottom-up judgments of the "Dark Ages" and into the true light of science, with better treatability.